PNN test of 1 hour!
With the 1-hour push Aliena test www.asps.it/Aliena.jpg it
was shown that the boost increases PNN
over time with only a V-shaped dipole but of
new conception (info in www.asps.it ) according to what
had already been seen and observed in all previous tests.
With one hundred Aliena thrusters enhanced in series and
parallel to take off for the Moon and Mars
without losing mass!
Continuous and increasing thrust without losing even 1
milligram of mass as in this graph
www.asps.it/trustgra1.jpg
PNN test of 1 hour!
With the 1-hour push Aliena test www.asps.it/Aliena.jpg it
was shown that the boost increases PNN
over time with only a V-shaped dipole but of
new conception (info in www.asps.it ) according to what
had already been seen and observed in all previous tests.
On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 14:01:53 +0800, Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
wrote:
On 12-Nov-24 5:04 pm, Emidio Laureti wrote:
PNN test of 1 hour!
With the 1-hour push Aliena test www.asps.it/Aliena.jpg it
was shown that the boost increases PNN
over time with only a V-shaped dipole but of
new conception (info in www.asps.it ) according to what
had already been seen and observed in all previous tests.
This should raise doubts in itself. Why would there be a time dependency
if it works the way you claim it does?
Sylvia.
I start to think that you are not a sane person.
We said already that the thrust increases in time at parity of
consumed energy.
On 12-Nov-24 5:04 pm, Emidio Laureti wrote:
PNN test of 1 hour!
With the 1-hour push Aliena test www.asps.it/Aliena.jpg it
was shown that the boost increases PNN
over time with only a V-shaped dipole but of
new conception (info in www.asps.it ) according to what
had already been seen and observed in all previous tests.
This should raise doubts in itself. Why would there be a time dependency
if it works the way you claim it does?
Sylvia.
On 18-Nov-24 3:36 pm, Von Ottone wrote:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 14:01:53 +0800, Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
wrote:
On 12-Nov-24 5:04 pm, Emidio Laureti wrote:
PNN test of 1 hour!
With the 1-hour push Aliena test www.asps.it/Aliena.jpg it
was shown that the boost increases PNN
over time with only a V-shaped dipole but of
new conception (info in www.asps.it ) according to what
had already been seen and observed in all previous tests.
This should raise doubts in itself. Why would there be a time dependency >>> if it works the way you claim it does?
Sylvia.
I start to think that you are not a sane person.
We said already that the thrust increases in time at parity of
consumed energy.
What does "parity of consumed energy" mean?
Sylvia
On 18-Nov-24 4:24 pm, Von Ottone wrote:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 16:02:18 +0800, Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
wrote:
On 18-Nov-24 3:36 pm, Von Ottone wrote:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 14:01:53 +0800, Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> >>>> wrote:
On 12-Nov-24 5:04 pm, Emidio Laureti wrote:
PNN test of 1 hour!
With the 1-hour push Aliena test www.asps.it/Aliena.jpg it
was shown that the boost increases PNN
over time with only a V-shaped dipole but of
new conception (info in www.asps.it ) according to what
had already been seen and observed in all previous tests.
This should raise doubts in itself. Why would there be a time dependency >>>>> if it works the way you claim it does?
Sylvia.
I start to think that you are not a sane person.
We said already that the thrust increases in time at parity of
consumed energy.
What does "parity of consumed energy" mean?
Sylvia
250 Watts input power all the time for 1 hour, the thrust increases,
apparently linearly...
Sounds like a temperature effect to me. Convection increases in response
to an increasing difference between the temperature of the device and >ambient.
Sylvia.
On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 16:02:18 +0800, Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
wrote:
On 18-Nov-24 3:36 pm, Von Ottone wrote:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 14:01:53 +0800, Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
wrote:
On 12-Nov-24 5:04 pm, Emidio Laureti wrote:
PNN test of 1 hour!
With the 1-hour push Aliena test www.asps.it/Aliena.jpg it
was shown that the boost increases PNN
over time with only a V-shaped dipole but of
new conception (info in www.asps.it ) according to what
had already been seen and observed in all previous tests.
This should raise doubts in itself. Why would there be a time dependency >>>> if it works the way you claim it does?
Sylvia.
I start to think that you are not a sane person.
We said already that the thrust increases in time at parity of
consumed energy.
What does "parity of consumed energy" mean?
Sylvia
250 Watts input power all the time for 1 hour, the thrust increases, apparently linearly...
On 2024-11-18 6:51 a.m., Von Ottone wrote:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 19:28:43 +0800, Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
wrote:
On 18-Nov-24 4:24 pm, Von Ottone wrote:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 16:02:18 +0800, Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> >>>> wrote:
On 18-Nov-24 3:36 pm, Von Ottone wrote:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 14:01:53 +0800, Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> >>>>>> wrote:
On 12-Nov-24 5:04 pm, Emidio Laureti wrote:
PNN test of 1 hour!
With the 1-hour push Aliena test www.asps.it/Aliena.jpg it
was shown that the boost increases PNN
over time with only a V-shaped dipole but of
new conception (info in www.asps.it ) according to what
had already been seen and observed in all previous tests.
This should raise doubts in itself. Why would there be a time dependency
if it works the way you claim it does?
Sylvia.
I start to think that you are not a sane person.
We said already that the thrust increases in time at parity of
consumed energy.
What does "parity of consumed energy" mean?
Sylvia
250 Watts input power all the time for 1 hour, the thrust increases,
apparently linearly...
Sounds like a temperature effect to me. Convection increases in response >>> to an increasing difference between the temperature of the device and
ambient.
Sylvia.
You don't know what you say.
We are at 64 grams of thrust, on a kern precision scale.
She did not say that you did not have thrust. I believe you that you
have "64 grams" (I assume here that you mean 0.63 N, when you say 64
grams) of thrust. I believe, as Sylvia does, that your 0.63 N of thrust
comes from a temperature effect. All the data that has been provided by
PNN enthusiasts here are compatible with a temperature effect.
Alain Fournier
On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 19:28:43 +0800, Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
wrote:
On 18-Nov-24 4:24 pm, Von Ottone wrote:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 16:02:18 +0800, Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
wrote:
On 18-Nov-24 3:36 pm, Von Ottone wrote:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 14:01:53 +0800, Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> >>>>> wrote:
On 12-Nov-24 5:04 pm, Emidio Laureti wrote:
PNN test of 1 hour!
With the 1-hour push Aliena test www.asps.it/Aliena.jpg it
was shown that the boost increases PNN
over time with only a V-shaped dipole but of
new conception (info in www.asps.it ) according to what
had already been seen and observed in all previous tests.
This should raise doubts in itself. Why would there be a time dependency >>>>>> if it works the way you claim it does?
Sylvia.
I start to think that you are not a sane person.
We said already that the thrust increases in time at parity of
consumed energy.
What does "parity of consumed energy" mean?
Sylvia
250 Watts input power all the time for 1 hour, the thrust increases,
apparently linearly...
Sounds like a temperature effect to me. Convection increases in response
to an increasing difference between the temperature of the device and
ambient.
Sylvia.
You don't know what you say.
We are at 64 grams of thrust, on a kern precision scale.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 164:50:41 |
| Calls: | 10,385 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 14,057 |
| Messages: | 6,416,518 |