• Sexual harmonic(s) adjustment criteria

    From David Dalton@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jul 28 22:42:41 2024
    XPost: alt.support.marriage, alt.support.divorce, soc.men
    XPost: soc.women, alt.support.impotence

    I currently hope that the changes described below have just
    occurred. If not, they should within the next six months.

    ------------------------------------

    The sexual harmonic(s) adjustment criteria are now:

    1. For incompatible or partially compatible relationships
    involving one (A) or two (F) a.s.r., if they are currently
    committed and (a) have been committed for at least
    the last 5 months with no temporary breakup of more
    than three weeks and/or (b) at least one of them has at
    least one child under 17, including adoptive or fetus
    or even embryo, then they will become optimally sexually
    compatible in (A,F)-HDBE.

    2. For incompatible or partially compatible relationships
    not involving any a.s.r., if they are currently committed and
    (a) have been committed for at least the last year with
    no temporary breakup of more than two weeks and/or
    (b) at least one of them has at least one child under 16 and 2/3,
    including adoptive or fetus or even embryo, then they
    will become optimally sexually compatible in R-HDBE.

    Again, as I said months ago, a firm promise of adoption
    to a child under 17 for (A,F) or 16 and 2/3 (for R) that is in effect at
    the conclusion of (A,F)-HDBE or R-HDBE, whichever applies,
    would be sufficient, but note that I hope that
    (A,F)-HDBE and sexuality aspects of RHDBE have been applied.

    It is also extended to marriage groups of more than two.
    For example, two fence jumping gay--lesbian couples
    might become (2bim+bimT+straight-type-2-F) or
    (bifT+straight-type-2-M+2bif) and in either case
    all four would be optimally sexually compatible
    with one another.

    New this evening:

    In the sexual harmonics adjustments I said that newly
    optimally sexually compatible relationships (and also
    existing same sex relationships) would not lock until
    next sex even if they have had sex before. That has
    changed. Committed relationships that become
    optimally sexually compatible and have had sex
    before will be locked right away, not just after next
    sex. The same is true for existing committed same
    sex relationships (for the most recent sex in a
    committed relationship).

    Also there is some further relaxing. Couples that are
    separated but not divorced and are not committed
    to other(s) and otherwise meet the above criteria
    will become optimally sexually compatible and if
    they have had sex in the past they will be locked.
    The same will be true for couples who are divorced
    and have shared custody and are not committed
    to other(s).

    The shared custody would have to be of at least one child
    under 17 (A,F) or 16 and 2/3 (R).

    Also some relationships are too abusive and will be split
    across species boundaries in the species split.

    In the fence-jumping foursomes mentioned above,
    the locks would be between the two male forms
    and between the two female forms, so they cannot
    break the compatible foursome into two pairs of
    male form--female form.

    There has also been a global family and marriage blessing.

    For single people, I have matchmaking ability and soon
    so will the 1.55 million human a.s.r. globally.

    If you have any questions, ask me on alt.religion.druid
    or by email since I am committing the Usenet sin of
    not checking these groups for followups.

    --
    David Dalton dalton@nfld.com https://www.nfld.com/~dalton (home page) https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns (mystic page) “And the cart is on a wheel; And the wheel is on a hill; And the
    hill is shifting sand; And inside these laws we stand" (Ferron)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)