Hello,




More of my philosophy about my other logical proof of why i think that the main problem in our world is the lack of high standards and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


As i just said previously that I think that the other problematic is that countries such as Russia and China want a multipolar world where they play an important role, but i think that it is not the main problem since also China or Russia or such
countries can become powerful and play an important role in the world, but i think that the main problem in our world is the lack of high standards, i will give "another" logical proof of it so that you understand why our world needs high standards, and
here it is , read my following thoughts so that to understand my logical proof:

So, so that to understand more, I invite you to read the following interesting paper by John Cavanagh director of the Washington-based Institute for Policy Studies, and Jerry Mander a senior fellow at the Public Media Center:

World Bank, IMF turned poor Third World nations into loan addicts

https://www.tru.ca/library/pdf/cavanagh-mander.pdf

And I invite you to read the following so that to understand how IMF and World Bank can be reformed:

Reforming the IMF and World Bank

Read more here:

https://www.ox.ac.uk/research/research-impact/reforming-imf-and-world-bank

And read the following:

UN, World Bank, IMF in need of urgent reforms: Sitharaman

"Institutions such as United Nations, World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) need to be urgently reformed as they no longer speak for countries whose issues have remained unattended to for decades, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman said."

Read more here:

https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/un-world-bank-imf-in-need-of-urgent-reforms-sitharaman/article36979090.ece


And read my previous thoughts:


More of my philosophy about the main problem of our world that is
the lack of high standards and more of my thoughts..

I think that the other problematic is that countries such as Russia and China want a multipolar world where they play an important role, but i think that it is not the main problem since also China or Russia or such countries can become powerful and play
an important role in the world, but i think that the main problem in our world is the lack of high standards, i will give a logical proof of it so that you understand my views, and here it is , read my following thoughts so that to understand my logical
proof:

More of my philosophy about the US problems and world problems and more of my thoughts..

I think that i am highly smart, and the main problem of USA as i am showing it below by posting the web links, is that Management consultants, like of the powerful McKinsey, implemented and rationalized a transformation in the American corporation by
downsizing in response not to particular business problems but rather to a new managerial ethos and methods; they downsized when profitable as well as when struggling, and during booms as well as busts. So i think it is the main problem, since for
example read in the following paper that says that: "In contrast to the conventional wisdom, we find that plants of the U.S. manufacturing sector that increased employment as well as productivity contribute almost as much to overall productivity growth
in the 1980s as the plants that increased productivity at the expense of employment."

Read more here so that to understand:

Downsizing and Productivity Growth: Myth or Reality?

https://www.jstor.org/stable/40228705

But about the other problem of part-time employment, i think American corporations have to understand that this way of managing
by part-time employment is limited, since we know that a 10% increase in the part-time share is associated with 4.8% higher productivity, so read my below thoughts so that to understand my views:

More of my philosophy about McKinsey and more of my thoughts..

I invite you to look at the following interesting video about McKinsey:

How McKinsey Became One Of The Most Powerful Companies In The World

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BBmmMj_maII

And i also invite you to read this interesting article about McKinsey:

How McKinsey Destroyed the Middle Class

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/02/how-mckinsey-destroyed-middle-class/605878/

I think i am smart, and i have just looked at the above video and i have
just read the above article, and i think McKinsey was doing it with like the traditional levers, but i think this classical way of managing is not so difficult for countries, but i think this classical way of managing is much less important than the much
important way of doing it
with artificial intelligence, since compelling data reveal a discouraging truth about economic growth in western countries today, since there has been a marked decline in the ability of traditional levers of production capital investment and labor to
propel economic growth in western countries, since i say that in economic management we know that firms with a large part-time employment share are more productive than firms with a large share of full-time workers, but a 10% increase in the part-time
share is associated with 4.8% higher productivity, so as you notice there is a limit to this way of managing with part-time employment, like was doing it McKinsey, so i think that it is AI(artificial intelligence) that could increase much more the
economic growth rates in western countries by changing the nature of work and creating a new relationship between man and machine. The impact of AI technologies on business can increase much more labor productivity and enable people to make more
efficient use of their time, but the most important thing is that Digital and AI literacy is of utmost importance to help countries businesses scale and compete internationally. Investing in widespread digital and AI literacy for the entire population
will increase domestic demand for technology and technology jobs. A technologically literate population will create more data, which fuels AI and thus the data-driven economy as a whole. It is also necessary for workers to be able to upskill and re-skill
in order to remain productive and competitive in an automated workforce. Countries businesses that adopt AI technology will save from lower production costs, have increased output, and be able to invest more. Increased revenue from this domestic demand,
and with a global reputation for responsible AI, will help countries businesses scale globally and compete on the international level.

And read the two following web links so that to understand more what i am saying:

"Compelling data reveal a discouraging truth about growth today. There
has been a marked decline in the ability of traditional levers of
production capital investment and labor to propel economic growth."

And it it says the following:

"Accenture research on the impact of AI in 12 developed economies
reveals that AI could double annual economic growth rates in 2035 by
changing the nature of work and creating a new relationship between man
and machine. The impact of AI technologies on business is projected to
increase labor productivity by up to 40 percent and enable people to
make more efficient use of their time."

Read more here so that to notice it:

https://www.accenture.com/ca-en/insight-artificial-intelligence-future-growth-canada

And McKinsey estimates that AI(Artificial intelligence) may deliver an additional economic output of around US$13 trillion by 2030, increasing
global GDP by about 1.2 % annually. This will mainly come from
substitution of labour by automation and increased innovation in
products and services.

Read more here:

https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2019/637967/EPRS_BRI(2019)637967_EN.pdf

More of my philosophy about the american dream and more of my thoughts..

The American dream was initially conceived by Thomas Jefferson as each citizen’s right to the pursuit of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, this american dream is not about guaranteed outcomes, of course, but the pursuit of opportunities, so
notice carefully
that i have just spoken more and more about those kind of opportunities
that we have to have and that makes the american dream, like for example
my talking in my below thoughts about Progressive Capitalism of Joseph E. Stiglitz, since Joseph E. Stiglitz is saying in his videos below that he has advised the democratic party about his reforms of his progressive capitalism, so read my below thoughts
carefully so that to understand:


And I have just looked at many videos on youtube of Joseph Stiglitz and
i have just understood him well, but i have just quickly found the following interesting video of him that explains well the reforms that we need so that to be progressive capitalism, and he is saying in this video that he has advised the democratic
party about his reforms of his
progressive capitalism and i think that he is a democrat, so i
invite you to look at his following interesting video so that
to understand:

Joseph Stiglitz on People, Power, and Profit | Munich Security Conference 2020

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sym4UZOjhJc


And more precision about more of my philosophy about progressive capitalism..

I invite you again to look at the following interesting video of Joseph E. Stiglitz that speaks about some thoughts of his interesting book “People, Power, and Profits: Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent.”:

Joseph Stiglitz on People, Power, and Profits: Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLJksgMIDdI


And read his following interesting article in The New York Times so that
to understand:

Joseph E. Stiglitz is a university professor at Columbia, the 2001 recipient of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics, a former chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, a former chief economist of the World Bank and the author, most recently, of “
People, Power, and Profits: Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent.”, and i invite you to read his following interesting article in The New York Times:

Progressive capitalism is not an oxymoron

Read more here:

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/19/opinion/sunday/progressive-capitalism.html


More of my philosophy about state planning or the too much state planning and more of my thoughts..


I think what is happening today in our world is that the world Bank and IMF and many powerful western countries are wanting countries such as Russia and Algeria and many other Arab countries and such, by also forcing many of them in a kind of way with
some mechanisms, to transition from the state planning or too much state planning to minimum state intervention by boosting competition and by enlarging the private sector and shrinking the public sector so that to be efficient economies, and
specialization in a job is of course required so that to be efficient, and also they are wanting them to be Democratic and to have a separation of powers like in the U.S. Constitution that establishes three separate but equal branches of government: the
legislative branch (makes the law), the executive branch (enforces the law), and the judicial branch (interprets the law) so that to be efficient, and i think it is what is lacking in countries such
as Russia and Algeria and many arab countries and such that prevent
them from being efficient economies, and so that to understand more ,
i invite you so that to look at the following interesting video
of how Israel was not long ago an inefficient economy like of that of Russia and it has transitioned to an efficient economy in the Time of prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and here is the video and look at it carefully:

The Israeli Way of Doing Business

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhH5OiAiD-0



More of my philosophy about how Algeria or many arab countries can boost there economy and more of my thoughts..

I have just read the following interesting article about how Algeria
can boost its economy, and i think it is also the way to follow
for many arab countries, so i invite you to read it here:

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/04/how-to-liberate-algeria-s-economy/

And as you notice in the above article that the boosting competition is essential, so competition is important as i have just explained it in my previous post, other than that read my following thoughts about Algeria so that to understand my views:


More of my philosophy about corruption and about statistics and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ,
so i invite you to look at the following new video of an algerian
journalist that is speaking about the algerian system of governance:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pq7oXarkGMc


So i think i am discovering patterns with my fluid intelligence
in the above video, so notice that the algerian journalist in the above video is saying that the algerian system of governance is fondamentally corrupt and he is saying it hurts a lot the system and it is why it is not working, but notice the mistake
that he is making, that he has first to ask if Algeria has a good organization like statistics Canada that gives good statistics about economy and healthcare system and about the system, and the statistics have to be macrostatistics or macroscale
statistics and microstatistics or microscale statistics so that to show the advantages and disadvantages and the weaknesses of the system, so we can not just say as the algerian journalist above that the algerian system of governance is not working
because it is corrupt, since we have to speak and give good statistics as i am saying above, so it is why i think that the above algerian journalist is not objective, so i think that we can logically infer from my thoughts that one of the most important
thing to have as a country is a good organization like statistics Canada that gives good statistics about economy and healthcare system and about the system, and the statistics has to be macrostatistics or macroscale statistics and microstatistics or
microscale statistics so that to show the advantages and disadvantages and the weaknesses of the system.


More of my philosophy about the way of prevention and about the way of statistics and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so as you notice that we have to be vigilant, since i think that Algeria is not Haiti, so i think that Algeria is
not in a bad shape as Haiti or such, but of course i have to be more objective, so as you have just noticed that i have just talked about the good way of statistics as i am explaining it below, so as you notice we can monitor more the system with the
way of statistics, but i think that there is also the way of "prevention", since there is for example the way of learning by making mistakes, but you have to be more smart and know how to be the right prevention from making mistakes, so i think it is the
wise way, so then we can then talk about Democracy and about the separation of powers like in the U.S. Constitution that establishes three separate but equal branches of government: the legislative branch (makes the law), the executive branch (enforces
the law), and the judicial branch (interprets the law), so i think we can ask a philosophical question such as of how to "ensure" the separation of powers so that to not corrupt the system and so that to be the right dose of meritocracy or quality ? so i
think that Democracy has the mechanism of "competition" between the actors of Democracy like of that between the medias and congress and the government and the people, and i think that the separation of powers also comes with a kind of competition too
that prevent corruption, so then we have to understand from it that statistics as i am explaining it below are not enough , since the basis of the system has to provide with the right mechanisms such as of Democracy and the separation of powers.



More of my philosophy about Israel and about white supremacists of national vanguard and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..



I have just read the following article about Israel from the white supremacist website called national vanguard, and i invite you to read it(and you can translate it from french to english):

Israel, Land of Asylum of the Great Scam

https://nationalvanguard.org/2023/01/israel-terre-dasile-de-la-grande-arnaque/


So i am not in accordance with what is saying the above article about Israel, since there can be "some" corruption in Israel, but i don't think that jews in general or jews of Israel are corrupt people, since there is the engine of the fact that so that
to be Liberty of our today and our future we have to be responsability, so then we have to adapt correctly, and i think that quality also comes from "competition", so then so that to be quality , competition is first and foremost the will to fight, since
even America’s military argues that “will to fight” is the disposition and decision to fight, act, or persevere, and notice that this will to fight is a cause of quality that precedes the good smartness or good education as causes of quality, and i
think that competition is also the acts of competition of the acts of being good smartness or/and the acts of being good wisdom and such , so then what we have to be is to be competition that brings the right quality, so then you have to be for example a
competition in a fight for life, and you have to be economic competition of Adam Smith the father of economic Liberalism, and i also think that the seeking the big profit by being competition is also regulated by antitrust laws, and individual self-
interest and egoism creates competition and by the mechanism of competition we become self-interest and egoism of a group and of a society or of a zone such as the European union and then we become collaboration and cooperation and even solidarity in a
society or in a zone such as the European union or in global world and this creates prosperity and happiness of nations, and also we have to say that when we get a big profit we can also help the others by being solidarity, but we have to be patience
since it takes some time so that this individual self-interest and egoism becomes collaboration and cooperation and even solidarity, and of course we have to be much more optimistic since capitalism is not a zero sum game, since with a reasonable level
of growth, capitalism can both deliver rising living standards for most, and still ensure a relatively high rate of return to the owners of capital and we have to be much more optimistic since self-interest is most of the time regulated by competition to
not lead to corruption, fraud, price-gouging, and cheating, as has said it Adam Smith the father of economic Liberalism, and notice that we have to look at competition from a broader point of view since competition is also competition inside a Democracy
that fights efficiently corruption by using different political parties and different political groups inside the congress and the like and competition that fights efficiently corruption is also the separation of powers in USA, since the U.S.
constitution establishes three separate but equal branches of government: the legislative branch (makes the law), the executive branch (enforces the law), and the judicial branch (interprets the law), so i think that for example USA is much less corrupt
than African countries or such countries since they lack this kind of "competition" that balances this way the powers. Also i invite
you to read my below thoughts about the other engine that i am talking about:


More of my philosophy about adaptation and about the standard and more of my thoughts..

So think i am talking philosophy about the how we are perfected , and i just said about it the following:


"Since philosophically i can say that we are also perfected by the engine of the taking care of our own "image" in front of the others so that to not be discriminated or hated, so this permit us to take care of our dignity. And of course i say that our
own image is judged by a standard, but this standard by wich we judge the others is also perfected by the exponential progress of our humanity and by our experience and by our education, and i think even the standard by wich we judge a product or service
is perfected the same way, but i say we have not to be pessimistic about the standard by wich we judge the others since we are progressing in an exponential way."


But you are noticing that i am not saying that we have to adapt or to survive, since we can adapt or survive and not be correctly perfected, so as you are noticing i am showing above wich engine is perfecting us and in wich way by talking about how to
make the standard by wich
we judge the others or by wich we judge the product or service , and i am talking this way so that to make it clear that so that to progress or advance correctly we have to take care of what i am saying above.


More of my philosophy about Eric Zemmour and about dignity and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


I have just looked at Eric Zemmour in the following french video, and
i invite you to look at it:

Eric Zemmour dénonce la décadence

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBMF4n9J_wA


So i am noticing in the above video of Eric Zemmour that he is saying
that the West is living a decadence or in what we call moral or cultural decline, but i think that Eric Zemmour is not right , since philosophically i can say that we are also perfected by the engine of the taking care of our own "image" in front of the
others so that to not be discriminated or hated, so this permit us to take care of our dignity, so for example i don't think that maghrebis or maghrebians in France have no dignity, since they are also perfected by this same engine, also we have not to
forget that we are advancing very fast in an exponential way, so it is why i think that humans will rapidly advance much more , but of course we have to know how to manage our exponential progress, so it is why we have not to be pessimistic as Eric
Zemmour is pessimistic, also i invite you to read all my following views about artificial intelligence and about white supremacists and about the meaning of life or human life:


More of my philosophy about white supremacism and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..

So I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ,
so i have just read the following article from white supremacists of
the national vanguard, i invite you to read it:


https://nationalvanguard.org/2023/01/one-shot-and-one-shot-only/


So as you are noticing that the white supremacists are saying in the
above article the following:

"THE DAY IS UPON us. The West is, in all senses of the word, now dead. We lie in the catacombs of our once great civilization."


So i think i am smart , and when i look at the statistics i can
not say that the West is, in all senses of the word, now dead,
so then i say that we have to learn how to look at the statistics,
and we have to learn that the West is not idiot, since if the statistics say that the West is now dead, you will notice it, and if the statistics say that jews are hurting the West, you will notice it in the statistics, so i think that the jews are not
hurting the West since the statistics are not saying it, so i think that the West is not dead as is saying it the above white supremacist website, and i think that the West is smart and we have to be optimistic about the West, and of course i invite you
to read all my following views about artificial intelligence and about the meaning of human life:

More precision of my philosophy about the distribution of quality of the data on wich is trained generative AI and more of my thoughts..

So I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ,
so i think that there is an important thing that i have to explain,
and it is that generative AI like ChatGPT was trained on data so that
to learn by detecting patterns and using them, but we can ask if
the distribution of the quality of data on wich generative AI like ChatGPT was trained on is looks like the normal distribution of IQs ? so i think that it is not like the normal distribution of IQs, since for example in technicality of software
development, ChatGPT was trained on Stack Overflow and on Gitub and on many technical books, so i think that those that ask questions and answers them in Stack Overflow are more smart than average smartness of people, and i think that the ones that make
softwares on Gitub are more smart than average smartness of people and it is the same for technical books, so it is why the data of technicality of software development on wich ChatGPT was trained or the next GPT-4 will be trained is of higher quality
than when it comes from average smartness, so it is why i think that generative AI like ChatGPT is dangerous, so read my following previous thoughts to understand my views about it:


More of my philosophy about what is exactly the problem with the lawsuit against Microsoft and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..

So I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ,
i have just read again another new article about the lawsuit against Microsoft , here it is:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-01-09/github-s-openai-powered-copilot-sparks-legal-debate


And i think that the problematic is that generative AI such as ChatGPT
detects and use patterns of creativity, and those patterns can be
the high smartness of a human or creativity of a human, so i think it is the main problem, since if for example Microsoft and OpenAI have to train there generative AI with gitub open source softwares, so it will for example detect "smart" patterns that
are made by high smartness of individuals, so it will get much more smart by using them, but i think that using those patterns by generative AI is not lawful, since the generative AI will get much more smart by using those smart patterns of smart people
that belong to open source developers and it will then hurt them since the generative AI will become a too much concentration of power that hurts in a not lawful way, so from my thoughts you are understanding that there is even smart patterns on books
and on gitub that come from smart people that makes generative AI dangerous.

More of my philosophy about the lawsuit against Microsoft that could change the future of AI and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..


I invite you to read the following interesting new article about the lawsuit against Microsoft that could change the future of AI:


"With ChatGPT, artificial intelligence and what it can do is suddenly all the rage. But an intellectual property lawsuit against Microsoft could undermine the future of AI before it gets off the ground."

Read more here:

https://www.computerworld.com/article/3684734/this-lawsuit-against-microsoft-could-change-the-future-of-ai.html


More of my philosophy about ChatGPT and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..


I have just looked at the following video of what is saying
Yann LeCun, that is a known French computer scientist working primarily in artificial intelligence , about ChatGPT, so i invite you to look at it in the following youtube link:

What Yann LeCun thinks of ChatGPT?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3RPzfZIhw3s


So I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ,
and i think that Yann LeCun in the above video is saying that ChatGPT
is entertaining, but it is not useful, so i think that he is not thinking correctly, since i have already tested ChatGPT , and i think that it is useful, since it can make you much more productive and it can also make creativity much more easy for you,
also i think that ChatGPT can score well on many technical subjects and other subjects, and i mean that even if it doesn't score 100% all the time , it can be useful by scoring near by approximating well the right solution, and i think it will improve
much more in the next version with GPT-4
that will be ready in 2023, so it is why i am optimistic about the performance of ChatGPT and the next GPT-4, and of course i have just talked about my new model that explains consciousness and self-consciousness and what is the role they play in what we
call smartness and it explains why we will not attain general artificial intelligence, but of course i am explaining that even if we will not attain general artificial intelligence , ChatGPT and the next GPT-4 will still be really powerful and useful,
and of course read in my below thoughts so that to know about the business model of ChatGPT and the like so that to understand correctly, so i invite you to read about my new model below:


More of my philosophy about how ChatGPT takes a lot of computational power and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..


I think one of the problems of ChatGPT is also the business model for it, since systems like ChatGPT take a lot of computational power, and i invite you to read the following article so that to understand more about it:

"High cost of computational power

Systems like ChatGPT take a lot of computational power. The cost of running ChatGPT is $100,000 per day. It’s possible to make it work for a few million daily users, but scaling it up to billions of people will be extremely expensive. A single AI
answer costs more than ten regular Google search requests."


Read more here:

https://uxplanet.org/chatgpt-why-its-such-a-big-deal-for-all-industries-and-will-it-kill-google-796e83f93e69


And read also the following article so that to understand more:

https://bdtechtalks.com/2023/01/02/chatgpt-google-search/


More of my philosophy about what can’t do artificial intelligence and
about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


I invite you to read the following new article about artificial intelligence:

AI Might Be Seemingly Everywhere, but There Are Still Plenty of Things It Can’t Do—For Now

https://singularityhub.com/2023/01/13/ai-might-be-seemingly-everywhere-but-there-are-still-plenty-of-things-it-cant-do-for-now/


Also i invite you to read in my thoughts below about my new model about what is consciousness and what is self-consciousness and what is the role they play in what we call smartness:


More of my philosophy about transhumanism and about OpenAI and about Google and more of my thoughts..



[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)