• Re: Scientific Method Proves The Earth is not a Spinning Ball

    From 28A.K864@21:1/5 to All on Sun Mar 12 22:23:36 2023
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, talk.politics.misc, alt.science

    It has never been a "ball" - it's "oblate". The gooey center,
    spun around, causes a slight bulging at the equator. Used to
    spin faster, so it is less oblate now than a billion years
    ago. However it will never be a "ball" because of the combined
    gravitational pulls of the moon and sun. The old Greeks liked
    to imagine "heavenly" objects as perfect geometric forms. They
    were totally wrong, the reasons were complex, quasi-'religious'.
    There are NO "perfect spheres" in nature. It's all bendy-wendy.

    They SHOULD have taught you that in school - unless it was a
    really 'Woke', or "Fundamentalist", school of course ....

    Now the bullshit YOU are trying to sell ... sorry, WAY WAY WAY
    too much info out there confirming heliocentrism. You can even
    watch it work from Mars.

    My granny, MAYBE as a joke, claimed to be a "flat-earther".
    "Just look, it's FLAT !". I suspect it was a joke because
    she was high-IQ and well-read. But try to PROVE it ain't
    flat and it can get a bit complicated. The "watch the
    masts of the ships" don't cut it because atmospheric
    refraction can kinda duplicate that effect. The old Greek
    method was pretty good - drive stakes in the ground at
    different places and measure the shadows.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From slothe@21:1/5 to All on Mon Mar 13 22:00:39 2023
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, talk.politics.misc, alt.science

    On 12 Mar 2023, "28A.K864" <28A.K864@noqbgba.net> posted some news:zNqcnfZsZ7OnFJP5nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@earthlink.com:

    It has never been a "ball" - it's "oblate". The gooey center,
    spun around, causes a slight bulging at the equator. Used to
    spin faster, so it is less oblate now than a billion years
    ago. However it will never be a "ball" because of the combined
    gravitational pulls of the moon and sun. The old Greeks liked
    to imagine "heavenly" objects as perfect geometric forms. They
    were totally wrong, the reasons were complex, quasi-'religious'.
    There are NO "perfect spheres" in nature. It's all bendy-wendy.

    Hence the increased heat in the equatorial regions and one of the
    catalysts for the recent weather extremes.

    They SHOULD have taught you that in school - unless it was a
    really 'Woke', or "Fundamentalist", school of course ....

    Now the bullshit YOU are trying to sell ... sorry, WAY WAY WAY
    too much info out there confirming heliocentrism. You can even
    watch it work from Mars.

    My granny, MAYBE as a joke, claimed to be a "flat-earther".
    "Just look, it's FLAT !". I suspect it was a joke because
    she was high-IQ and well-read. But try to PROVE it ain't
    flat and it can get a bit complicated. The "watch the
    masts of the ships" don't cut it because atmospheric
    refraction can kinda duplicate that effect. The old Greek
    method was pretty good - drive stakes in the ground at
    different places and measure the shadows.

    Radio and TV.

    Horizon (mi) = 1.23 * sqrt(Height (ft));
    take an antenna 100 ft high. sqrt(100)=10; Horizon = 12.3 miles.

    Also see earth buldge

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line-of-sight_propagation#Earth_bulge

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From 28B.A864@21:1/5 to slothe on Mon Mar 13 23:16:26 2023
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, talk.politics.misc, alt.science

    On 3/13/23 6:00 PM, slothe wrote:
    On 12 Mar 2023, "28A.K864" <28A.K864@noqbgba.net> posted some news:zNqcnfZsZ7OnFJP5nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@earthlink.com:

    It has never been a "ball" - it's "oblate". The gooey center,
    spun around, causes a slight bulging at the equator. Used to
    spin faster, so it is less oblate now than a billion years
    ago. However it will never be a "ball" because of the combined
    gravitational pulls of the moon and sun. The old Greeks liked
    to imagine "heavenly" objects as perfect geometric forms. They
    were totally wrong, the reasons were complex, quasi-'religious'.
    There are NO "perfect spheres" in nature. It's all bendy-wendy.

    Hence the increased heat in the equatorial regions and one of the
    catalysts for the recent weather extremes.


    Um ... the heat has a lot more to do with solar exposure.
    "The Bulge" gets near-direct exposure 365.25 days a year.

    However "The Bulge" DOES kinda complicate what areas are
    "highest" and "lowest" in the world. If you measure from
    the center of the earth, features on "The Bulge" are indeed
    "higher" and Everest is NOT the Top Of The World. Some
    say Kilimanjaro...


    They SHOULD have taught you that in school - unless it was a
    really 'Woke', or "Fundamentalist", school of course ....

    Now the bullshit YOU are trying to sell ... sorry, WAY WAY WAY
    too much info out there confirming heliocentrism. You can even
    watch it work from Mars.

    My granny, MAYBE as a joke, claimed to be a "flat-earther".
    "Just look, it's FLAT !". I suspect it was a joke because
    she was high-IQ and well-read. But try to PROVE it ain't
    flat and it can get a bit complicated. The "watch the
    masts of the ships" don't cut it because atmospheric
    refraction can kinda duplicate that effect. The old Greek
    method was pretty good - drive stakes in the ground at
    different places and measure the shadows.

    Radio and TV.

    Horizon (mi) = 1.23 * sqrt(Height (ft));
    take an antenna 100 ft high. sqrt(100)=10; Horizon = 12.3 miles.


    They'll blame it on "atmospheric effects" and/or
    "ground wave" :-)


    Also see earth buldge

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line-of-sight_propagation#Earth_bulge

    Too subtle - SURE to be "atmospherics" :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)