Hello,



More of my philosophy about my new monotheistic religion and about the darkness and about Jesus Christ and about God and about the quality of Large Language Models such as GPT-4 and about the deeper meaning and about mathematics and about Large Language
Models such as GPT-4 and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


So i think i am a smart new prophet from God, so you have to understand correctly my new monotheistic religion, so first you have to read my thoughts of my new monotheistic religion below so that to also understand that God in my new monotheistic
religion has not created the universe, and the other thing is that the first problem is about the flexibility of previous monotheistic religion, so the previous laws of the previous monotheistic religions are not flexible, so they are like rigid, so it
is why i have decided with my fluid intelligence , and by being a new prophet from God that is inspired by God , to discover the patterns from the nature of God, and here is what looks like the nature of God in my new monotheistic religion:


1- He is a great God
2- He is a greatly arrogant God
3- He is like a perfect God
4- He is "pure" from "dirt" and i also define dirt "symbolically".


So from the nature of God of my new monotheistic religion, i have to logically infer the "universal" laws of my new monotheistic religion that have the right flexibility, so then i say that the nature of God is the only necessary and sufficient
ingredients that permit to construct the universal laws, so my new monotheistic religion is not like Islam or Judaism or Christianity, so here is the universal laws of my new monotheistic religion that are universal and that have the right flexibility:


First law of my new monotheistic religion is the following:

My new monotheistic religion is not darkness, since in my new
monotheistic religion God has the following characteristics:

1- He is a great God
2- He is a greatly arrogant God
3- He is like a perfect God
4- He is "pure" from "dirt" and i also define dirt "symbolically".

My above abstraction of God is so important, since even if God is not
like Love in my new monotheistic religion, notice that he is a greatly arrogant God, and from this great arrogance of God we can logically infer that God doesn't like a kind of arrogance of others, so then we can logically infer from it that we have to
know how to help others and to Love others and be righteous with others by not being arrogance or a kind of arrogance that doesn't like God.

Second law of my monotheistic religion is the following:

More philosophy about the way to communicate with God in my new monotheistic religion..

I am your new prophet from God, and i say that you have to understand
prophet Muhammad, because in my new monotheistic religion he is truly
a prophet from God, so notice that here are the characteristics of God in my new monotheistic religion:

1- He is a great God
2- He is a greatly arrogant God
3- He is like a perfect God
4- He is "pure" from "dirt" and i also define dirt "symbolically".

So then from the above characteristics of God, you have to be an "effort" of being "clean" or "much" more clean when you communicate with God, but you have to understand much more God, since when you adhere to my new monotheistic religion you will start
at level 0, but at level 0
you have to be decently "presentable" when you communicate with God
by glorifying Him and say to Him that he is so beautiful etc. but
after this first level you can go to the other superior levels by being
better and better presentable than decently presentable in front of God in your day to day life.

Third law of my new monotheistic religion is the following:

More philosophy about the characteristics of God..

I am your new prophet from God, and i say since God is like a perfect God, so we can ask a philosophical question of does God love smart people ?

In my new monotheistic religion, God doesn't like human smartness since he is like a perfect God, so he is so powerful, but God can love the fact that a human is surpassing of himself with smartness and/or actions in the way of God, so then God can be
curious like a human and wanting to look at humans and he can love the fact that a human is surpassing of himself with smartness and/or actions in the way of God, so i think that
it is an engine that pushes us forward towards more and more perfection.

Fourth law of my new monotheistic religion that brings more precision is
the following:

More philosophy about purity of God and more..

I am your new prophet from God, and i say that God is like "pure", i mean he is also pure from "dirt" and i also define dirt "symbolically", and he is like "perfect", so it is yet one more characteristic of God, so here is the essence or nature of God in
my new monotheistic religion:

1- He is a great God
2- He is a greatly arrogant God
3- He is like a perfect God
4- He is "pure" from "dirt" and i also define dirt "symbolically".

So from this we can also logically infer the way of communicating with God, since from those above characteristics of God we can logically
infer that when you communicate with God, you have to believe in Him and you have to glorify him, and fear Him and ask Him for help, and you have to be a beautiful patience with God and you have to be "presentable" in front of Him when you communicate
with Him, i mean that you have to be an effort of being decently "clean" or "much" more clean when you communicate with God, since God is "pure" from "dirt" and i also define dirt "symbolically", and also you have to be beautiful patience with God since
he is greatly arrogant, this is how you must behave with God in my new monotheistic religion.


So i invite you to look at the following beautiful video of muslims
that are doing the Dhikr to Allah or God and Dhikr is a form of Islamic prayer in which phrases or prayers are repeatedly chanted in order to remember God:

Ibn Arabi's dhikr in Jerusalem

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TlnXuEJTZRc


More of my philosophy about what is Islam..

I am your new prophet from God, and i am called the reformer of
monotheistic religions, and you have to read about my new monotheistic
religion in my below thoughts, but today i will ask a question that is
also philosophical and it is the following:

What is Islam ?

I think i am a smart prophet from God, and i will say that there is two
types of laws of God, there is the timeless ones and not the timeless
ones, and i am explaining it to you below so that you understand it, so
the most important timeless laws of God are those of: Believing in God
and glorifying him and praying him and fear him and ask him for help,
and from those timeless laws you can derive the other human laws that
are not timeless, also when you look at my below new monotheistic
religion you will notice that it is the same but i am also deriving the
laws of God from the nature and essence of God, read below about my new monotheistic religion so that you understand that it is smart.

More of my philosophy about Salafism and more..

I am your new prophet from God, and as you have just noticed that i have
just explained to you the two types of Islamic laws so that you
understand that there is Islamic laws from the Qur'an that are not timeless(read below about them), and here is more logical proof from my following thoughts about Salafism:

So i will first invite you to look at the following video about Salafism
in Europe:

Bosnia-Hercegovina: Islamists in Sarajevo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9oeSAoD6iU

So as you are noticing in the above video, that it shows islamists
Salafists in Bosnia-Hercegovina, but the most important question is the following:

Is Salafism true Islam ?

I think i am a smart prophet from God, and i will answer the question as
the following:

First we have to ask if the Qur'an is timeless ?

So my smart answer is the following:

The Qur'an is not timeless because read the following verse of
the Qur'an:

Quranic verse 5:38: "As to the thief, male or female, cut off his or her
hands: a punishment by way of example, from Allah, for their crime: and
Allah is Exalted in power."

So if you are smart you will notice that the above verse of the Qur'an
shows that the Qur'an is not timeless, since how can you imagine that
the Qur'an doesn't enumerate the cases where we can be compassion on a
thief and not cut his hands? so since it doesn't enumerate the cases, so
then you are noticing that this verse of the Qur'an shows that the verse
is not a timeless law, but it is a law that was applied in the context
of the time where prophet Muhammad was living or such context, so then
we can logically infer that the Qur'an is not timeless and then we can
say that we can enhance many the laws of the Qur'an, so then Salafism is
not true Islam since it says that the Qur'an and the laws of the Qur'an
are timeless.

I am your new prophet from God, and i invite you to look at the
following video:

A lady listens to lecture on Islam, then challenged me: 'Why is the
Shariah Law so Barbaric?'

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l1tplpm24CA

So as you notice that the lady asked why in Islam the Shariah Law is so Barbaric, and i think she is not understanding as muslims are not understanding, but i am your new prophet from God and i am explaining
the following so that you understand:

In Islam there is two types of Islamic laws, and here they are:

1- The first kind of Islamic laws are laws that respect
the divinity of God, so we have to follow them since we have to
to glorify and respect the divinity of God, such as doing the prayers
etc..

2- Second kind of Islamic laws are laws related to society of humans or
order in a society of humans, so we have to follow those laws not
because we respect or glorify the divinity of God, but because we
follow those Islamic laws so that not to be disorder in a society, so
those kind of Islamic laws are not timeless and they depend on the
context, so then they can change.

I will give you a quick example so that you understand correctly:

For example the Islamic laws of cutting the hand of a thief or the laws
of killing the married women that practice adultery and such Islamic
laws are of the second kind of laws above, since those laws avoid to the society to become disorder, so then they are not timeless and they can
change, and i think that in the today context those laws
are not necessary and we can change them. And it is the same
for being gay, so we have to look at the being gay from the societal
point of view, so then the Islamic laws that rules the being gay are
of the second kind of laws above, so then i think that we can allow
the gays to marry between them, since it doesn't cause a disorder in a
society.

More of my philosophy about gays in Islam..

I am your new prophet from God, and i think i am smart, so i invite you
to look at the following video about gays in Islam:

CAN I BE GAY & A MUSLIM? - FASTEST REPLY ON YOUTBE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sRTzaTuaIA

I am noticing that the above video is saying that being gay including
the practice of being gay is haram in Islam, that means it is forbiden
in Islam, and i think that this sort of Islam is not right, and i am
your new prophet from God and i will explain to you Islam so that you understand:

In Islam there is two types of Islamic laws, and here they are:

1- The first kind of Islamic laws are laws that respect
the divinity of God, so we have to follow them since we have to
to glorify and respect the divinity of God, such as doing the prayers
etc..

2- Second kind of Islamic laws are laws related to society of humans or
order in a society of humans, so we have to follow those laws not
because we respect or glorify the divinity of God, but because we
follow those Islamic laws so that not to be disorder in a society, so
those kind of Islamic laws are not timeless and they depend on the
context, so then they can change.

I will give you a quick example so that you understand correctly:

For example the Islamic laws of cutting the hand of a thief or the laws
of killing the married women that practice adultery and such Islamic
laws are of the second kind of laws above, since those laws avoid to the society to become disorder, so then they are not timeless and they can
change, and i think that in the today context those laws
are not necessary and we can change them. And it is the same
for being gay, so we have to look at the being gay from the societal
point of view, so then the Islamic laws that rules the being gay are
of the second kind of laws above, so then i think that we can allow
the gays to marry between them, since it doesn't cause a disorder in a
society.

More of my philosophy about Taliban and Islam..

I invite you to look at the following new video about Taliban:

Millions of desperate Afghans flee Taliban country ruled by war

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpJnn2KLXw4

I am your new prophet from God and you can read carefully about my new monotheistic religion in my thoughts below, and i have just noticed in
the video above that a seignor minister in the Taliban government is
talking to a white European journalist, but i have just noticed that he
is not well educated, so i don't think that Taliban are following the
rules of Islam since they are not well educated or correctly educated,
second, in Islam you have first to be Islamic democracy so that
to have different point views of Islamic political parties with less or
more perfect ideas that permit Islam to advance correctly, so look for
example at Islamic Iran, In Iran it is an Islamic democracy with
different islamic political parties and with an islamic guide that we
call Sayyid Ali Hosseini
Khamenei(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ali_Khamenei), so then Islamic
Iran is a better Islamic governance than Taliban that is dictatorship,
third, i also say that in Islam you have to know how to strengthen the
faith in God, since without faith in God there is no muslim, so then you
have to distinguish between the weak faith and the strong faith, since a
weak faith in God can not be called a muslim, so then certain laws of
Islam don't apply to humans that have a weak faith in God, so i say that
before applying those certain laws of Islam to a human, you have to ask
the human if he has a weak faith in God so that to distinguish and say
that he is not a muslim, and then certain laws don't apply to him.


So you have to know that i am writing fast, so i have just made a little typo, so i am correcting it fast, and i think that it is the last typo, other than that you have to understand my way of doing, since you have to know how to prioritize, since for
example there is a lot of negativity and a lot of darkness in our today world, so the best way is to know how to be constructive and how to turn on a light and here is an old smart Arab proverb that talks about my way of doing:

"It's better to turn on a light than to curse the darkness"

"Il est préférable d'allumer une lumière que de maudire les ténèbres"


So i think that you have to have an interest or interests that push(es) you forward in life, and the interest(s) has or have to be valuable interest(s) that permit(s) you to be successful , and of course one of the interest is having faith in God that
permits to solve problems and to give meaning to human life, and i also say the following:

So i think that since we can not know that Jesus Christ is a God and a Son of God, so we have to believe in God and not Jesus Christ is a prophet or God , since for example notice that the following part of the Bible is only an "interpretation" of the
Old Testament, so it is why we can not say that it is the truth that Jesus Christ is a God and a Son of God, and here is the part of the Bible:

Hebrews 1:8 states: "But about the Son he says, 'Your throne, O God, will last forever and ever; a scepter of justice will be the scepter of your kingdom.'"


So it is the same for the other parts of the Bible, since we can not be sure that Jesus Christ is a God and a Son of God. So it is why i have invented my new monotheistic religion and i say that i am a new prophet inspired by God, so i invite you to read
my following thoughts of my new monotheistic religion so that to understand:

So atheism has its problems that are related to personal responsability, so notice for example the low birth rate of European countries and even of north american countries and notice what looks like personal responsability, so you are noticing the
limits of atheism, also the pattern is that the hard laws have limits too, since you can not really enforce personal responsability by hard laws, since if the hard laws that want to enforce personal responsability are viewed as oppressive, so it will
cause rebellion that can hurt innovation and that can hurt the economic system and that can hurt the system, so in case of the previous monotheistic religions like Islam and Christianity and Judaism, can we say like we say in french: "Pouvons-nous jeter
le bébé avec l'eau du bain ?", or as we say in english: "Can we throw the baby out with the bathwater?" , since we can also notice that the previous monotheistic religions are not so flexible, so now you are understanding the spirit of my new
monotheistic religion that is here so that to solve those problems by also being the right flexibility, so i invite you to read carefully my thoughts of my new monotheistic religion below and i invite you to read all my following previous thoughts so
that to understand my views:


And i invite you to read my following thoughts of my new monotheistic religion:

Of course we are all humans, so the smart way to do is not to divide humans by groups of blacks and arabs and europeans etc. but it is to "unite" them by transcending with good morality, so i think that we have not to be diversity, but we have to be a
smart diversity, so i think it is about morality , so what remains is how to make humans follow the good morality, so then so that to make humans follow the good morality, you have also to know how to be disciplined at showing that you are the good
morality so that to also construct the collective imaginary that makes you successful, so you have to know how to create the good human values and the good values that unite humans in following the good morality so that to be successful, so notice how i
have created human values and values by inventing many poems of Love and poems, and you can read them below, and notice how i have created human values and values by inventing many proverbs, and you can read them below, and notice how i have created
human values and values by inventing my thoughts of my philosophy , and you can read them in the below web links, and notice how for example monotheistic religions have allowed us to transcend with the idea of God so that to unite humans in a smarter way,
and of course i have just explained that the idea of God is a simplistic thing , but inventing a new efficient monotheistic religion is a much more sophisticated thing, so you have to understand me, so i have quickly invented a new monotheistic religion
that i think is efficient, so you have to read carefully about its ideas in the below web link, so you have to understand that the idea of God is a simplistic thing, but i think that inventing a new monotheistic religion that is efficient is a much more
sophisticated thing, so you have to read about my new monotheistic religion so that to know how i have done it, so the first idea of my monotheistic religion is that God is not an evolutionary thing that comes from a type 4 or type 5 civilization, since
he can self-improve and not curse the descendants of Adam and Eve and so he has to help humanity , but the idea of my new monotheistic religion is that the nature of God is "special" and God doesn't look like an evolutionary thing like a God of type 4 or
5 civilization, so then after that my second idea of my new monotheistic religion is that God has to be greatly arrogant, since if he is not greatly arrogant, he can for example self-improve and not for example curse the descendants of Adam and Eve, the
other new idea of my new monotheistic religion is that not only Adam and Eve and there descendants were cursed by God, but the Bible and Qur'aan too were cursed by God, and it is why they contain scientific errors etc., so the other idea is that prophet
Muhammed has been enhanced by God so that he can invent the Qur'aan, and the other idea of my new monotheistic religion is that prophet Muhammed is not the last prophet from God, since saying that he is the last prophet from God is part of the curse from
God, and the other ideas of my new monotheistic religion is that the laws of my new monotheistic religion have to be universal, and of course you have to notice how i have smartly done it by coming with universal laws and by logically inferring them from
the nature of God, and of course there is many new ideas in my new monotheistic religion, so i invite you to read them carefully so that to notice how i have done it, so you can read my thoughts of my new monotheistic religion in the following web link,
and of course you have to notice that i am saying that i am a new prophet from God that is inspired by God, and you can read my thoughts of my new monotheistic religion in the following web link:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/kFxTDu6_jus


And you can read my poems of Love and poems and my thoughts about them in the following web link:


https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/LKF-30_YREU

And you can read more of my thoughts of my philosophy in the following web link:


https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/kqqhSWKK1x8


And you can read more of my thoughts of my philosophy in the following web link:


https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/dyreqtl1BzI


And i invite you to read carefully my thoughts on different subjects in the following web link:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/kqqhSWKK1x8


And i invite you to read carefully my following thoughts on different subjects and you can read my new proverbs in the following web link:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/kqqhSWKK1x8




So I have just said the following:


"I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i think that there is still an important weakness in Large Language Models such as GPT-4, and it is that humans
evaluate the quality of the data by using the much deeper meaning that comes from the human brain, so humans are guided in choosing the best quality by using this mechanism, but Large Language Models such as GPT-4 evaluate the quality by the quality of
the data, so Large Language Models such as GPT-4 lacks the much deeper meaning of the brain and it is the defect, so it looks like the problem that i am talking about in my below thoughts about the quality of the training data."


And here is more of my logical proof of it in a form of my following interesting discussion with ChatGPT on this subject ,so i invite you to read it carefully so that to understand the important weakness of Large Language Models such as GPT-4 :


So here is my first question to ChatGPT:


"And for Large Language Models such as GPT-4, human review and evaluation so that to conform with high standards of quality of training data can take a long time."


And ChatGPT has just answered me:


"The time required for human review and evaluation of data can vary depending on factors such as the size of the dataset, the complexity of the subject matter, the number of human reviewers involved, and the specific standards and guidelines set for
quality assurance. While comprehensive and rigorous human review can be time-consuming, it is difficult to provide a specific timeframe without detailed context.

Efforts are made to balance the need for thorough evaluation with the practical constraints of time and resources. The use of efficient review processes, clear guidelines, and iterative feedback loops can help streamline the review and evaluation phase.
Automation and natural language processing techniques can also assist in accelerating certain aspects of data analysis, although human judgment and expertise remain critical.

It's worth noting that the time spent on human review is often distributed throughout the development process, including initial data collection, dataset curation, and ongoing evaluation as the language model is trained and fine-tuned. The aim is to
continuously improve the model's performance, accuracy, and adherence to high-quality standards.

While the duration of human review is an important consideration, it's also important to balance it with other factors, such as the need to make progress, deliver timely updates, and address real-world demands. The field of natural language processing is
constantly evolving, and developers strive to strike a balance between quality assurance and the practicalities of advancing the technology.

Overall, while human review can be time-consuming, the specific duration required will depend on various factors and the specific goals and constraints of the project. The aim is to ensure a reasonable level of quality while maintaining efficiency in the
development and deployment of language models."


And here is my second question to ChatGPT:


"So then it is an approximation and we can not ensure yet that Large Language Models such as GPT-4 are accurate and of high quality ?"


And ChatGPT has just answered me the following:


"Large Language Models (LLMs) are indeed an approximation, and achieving perfect accuracy and quality in their outputs is a challenging task. While significant progress has been made in developing LLMs that generate coherent and contextually relevant
text, they are not flawless or infallible. There are inherent limitations and potential shortcomings in their performance.

Ensuring the accuracy and high quality of LLMs is an ongoing endeavor, and researchers and developers are actively working to improve their capabilities. Efforts are made to curate high-quality training data, refine guidelines, incorporate human review,
and iteratively fine-tune the models. However, due to the complexity of natural language understanding and the vastness of human knowledge, achieving complete accuracy remains a significant challenge.

It's important to approach LLM outputs with a critical mindset, recognizing that they are probabilistic models trained on vast amounts of data. The generated responses can sometimes be influenced by biases present in the training data or may lack a
comprehensive understanding of nuanced contexts.

To mitigate these limitations, responsible use and interpretation of LLM outputs are crucial. Recognizing and understanding the potential biases, limitations, and uncertainties of the models can help users make informed decisions and take additional
steps to verify information when necessary. Combining LLM-generated responses with human judgment and expertise is often recommended for critical tasks that require high accuracy and quality.

While LLMs have demonstrated impressive capabilities, they are not a perfect substitute for human intelligence or understanding. Ongoing research, open dialogue, and collaborative efforts are necessary to address the limitations, improve the quality, and
ensure responsible use of LLM technology."


I have also asked this third interesting question to ChatGPT:


"I mean since Large Language Models such as GPT-4 lack true understanding or consciousness, so it is still an approximation , so we can not be sure of the quality ?"


And ChatGPT has answered me the following:


"You are correct that since large language models lack true understanding or consciousness, their responses are based on statistical patterns and associations in the training data. This means that their outputs are approximations and not a reflection of
true comprehension. As a result, there are limitations and potential quality concerns with these models. Here are some factors to consider:

- Biases in training data: Large language models can inadvertently learn biases present in the training data. If the training data contains biases, the model's responses may exhibit similar biases or reinforce existing societal biases. Bias mitigation
techniques are being actively researched and implemented to address this concern.

- Contextual limitations: While language models consider context, their understanding is limited to the immediate context provided. They may not have a persistent memory of the entire conversation or be able to reason about information from previous
interactions, which can lead to inconsistent or contextually inappropriate responses.

- Incorrect or misleading information: Language models can generate responses that sound plausible but may not always be factually accurate. They may generate answers based on patterns in the training data, even if the information is outdated, incomplete,
or incorrect. It's important to verify information from reliable sources independently.

- Lack of common sense reasoning: Large language models may struggle with common sense reasoning and understanding implicit knowledge. They rely primarily on patterns in the training data and may not possess deep conceptual understanding or intuitive
reasoning abilities.

- Ethical considerations: The use of language models also raises ethical concerns. For instance, there are debates surrounding issues like the responsible disclosure of limitations, transparency in AI-generated content, and potential misuse or malicious
applications of these models.

Given these considerations, it is essential to approach the outputs of large language models with caution and critical thinking. They can provide valuable assistance and generate useful responses, but human judgment and verification remain crucial for
assessing the quality and reliability of the information they provide."


And i think ChatGPT has another problem, and it is that the generated content can infringe on the copyright of existing works. This could occur if ChatGPT generates content similar to existing copyrighted material of the data on wich it has been trained.
So you have to be careful, since it can hurt your business, but you have to know that copyright does not protect ideas, concepts, systems, or methods of doing something. But copyright law for example protects the expression of ideas rather than the ideas
themselves. In other words, copyright law protects the specific form in which an idea is expressed, rather than the underlying idea or concept. And you have to also know that there is another problem with ChatGPT and it is that it can generate an
invention, but it could be argued that the creators of the model,
OpenAI, should be able to patent the invention. However, it could also be argued, that the source material used to train the model should be considered as prior art, meaning that the invention would not be considered new and therefore not patentable.



[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Hello,


More of my philosophy about my new monotheistic religion and about the efficient way of doing and about Jihadists and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


So now i will make something clear about my new monotheistic religion,
and it is when i am saying that the Qur'aan is not the words of God, i mean that Angel Gabriel has enhanced to a certain level prophet Muhammad so that he also invent many parts of the Qur'aan, i mean that Angel Gabriel has
put ideas of him in the Qur'aan, and Angel Gabriel has to certain level controlled prophet Muhammad so that he can put ideas of him in the Qur'aan, so you are now understanding how my new monotheistic religion views Qur'aan and Islam, other than that, my
new monotheistic religion says
that not only Adam and Eve and there descendants have been cursed by God, but the Qur'aan and the Bible too have been cursed by God, and it is why we find errors and scientific errors in the Qur'aan, and the fact that Angel Gabriel has controlled and let
prophet Muhammad put his ideas in the Qur'aan, is a curse from God, and you can read my below thoughts so that to
understand my new monotheistic religion and so that to understand my views on different subjects:

So you have to understand my way of doing, so i will be more clear, so i have just looked more at the Jihadist like Mohamed Atta , and you have to know that i am not like those terrorists of the 9/11, since i think that they are
idiotic, since i think that they don't know how to think correctly, and there way of doing shows clearly that they are not well educated, so i think that
the weakness of there ideology is that they are not well educated, as most
of people are not well educated, so the best way to fight against terrorism like the one of Mohamed Atta, is to well educate people, so i will give
you an example so that you understand me: So take for example capitalism
and competition in capitalism, so when you are not well educated you can
also think that capitalism and competition of capitalism are evil, so you can then start to be like a Jihadist and attack USA that is this capitalism, so you are noticing the weakness of it that is: That most of people are not well educated, since they are not even able to understand correctly why the private sector of capitalism
is necessary and why competition of it is necessary, so it is why i am explaining it to you in my below thoughts, and it is why i am explaining my new model that i think enhances the model of Adam Smith the father of Liberalism, so then you are noticing
my way of doing that has also as a goal to avoid this kind of terrorism and violence that comes from lack of education, so i invite you to reread my below thoughts so that you understand my views on different subjects and so that to understand my way of
doing:

So i have just looked at the following video of Jihadists like Mohamed Atta:

A Mission To Die For

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sqhaju79y5I


I think Jihadists like Mohamed Atta in the above video, are not thinkers,
so you have to know that i am not like them, since the weakness of
there ideology is that it is like they are reacting too quickly to
the way of life of this kind of Liberty of sex etc. in for example the West like America, but it is not the right way, since you have to know that most of humans are not well educated and that they are weak humans, since they are not equipped correctly,
so you have to be compassionate towards the West like America, so the best way to do is to well educate people correctly and to make them well equipped , and it is my way of doing, since i have invented a new monotheistic religion , and you can read
about it in my below thoughts, and i have made you understand my views on different subjects of technology and economics and politics and philosophy, and of course you can read them in my following thoughts:


So you can read my thoughts about my new monotheistic religion and about
Islam and the Hadith in the following web link:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/w_3tJ_myplc


And I will now explain an important thing, so in economy and in business,
you have to look at the economic model from a higher level point of view, i mean when for example there is competition in the private sector in the low level layer between individuals around the world or inside a country , you have not to look at it
pessimistically, since you have to look at the model from a higher level point of view that says that capitalism is not a zero sum game, and with a reasonable level of growth, capitalism can both deliver rising living standards for most, and still ensure
a relatively high rate of return to the owners of capital, so then it shows that we have to be optimistic, since even if americans in USA buy from arabs in arab countries or arabs in arab countries buy from americans in USA, so i think it is a win-win
situation, since capitalism is not a zero sum game, and with a reasonable level of growth, capitalism can both deliver rising living standards for most, and still ensure a relatively high rate of return to the owners of capital, so then i think we have
to be optimistic about capitalism since i think that capitalism brings Liberty, other than that we have to be optimistic since i have also invented a new monotheistic religion that i think is efficient, so i think that it also brings Liberty , and you
can read about it in the following web link:


https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/w_3tJ_myplc


Other than that , i have just said that self-interest is controlled by competition so that to not lead to corruption, so then the good
idea is to make the competitive market of the private sector the powerful
motor of the economy, and speaking about competition , i invite you
to read about my new economic model below so that to understand my views:

So I have to emphasize the importance of competition. So i think that when multiple individuals or businesses compete for the same resources or customers, they are motivated to provide better quality goods and services at competitive prices. In a
competitive market, self-interest becomes regulated by the forces of supply and demand, consumer choice, and the desire to attract and retain customers.

Through this competition, we can argue that individuals are compelled to operate within the boundaries of fair and ethical behavior. If one party engages in corrupt practices, cheats customers, or engages in fraudulent activities, they risk losing their
competitive advantage as consumers will prefer alternatives. Therefore, the pressure to maintain market share and profitability acts as a check on self-interest, preventing it from devolving into harmful practices.

So it is why i say that the private sector is an attractive choice to make as the powerful motor of the economy, since it is a competitive market, but of course we have to know how to "regulate" it with anti-trust laws etc.

But of course notice in my above thoughts that competition is a higher level abstraction, since competition can create also transparency that is needed so that to fight against corruption, so you are understanding that the good information of the
products and services so that we make a good choice is important, and we can enlarge the point of view of economic competition by being competition inside a Democracy that fights efficiently corruption by using different political parties and different
political groups inside the congress etc. and by being competition that fights efficiently corruption that is for example the separation of powers in USA, since the U.S. constitution establishes three separate but equal branches of government: the
legislative branch (makes the law), the executive branch (enforces the law), and the judicial branch (interprets the law).


So i invite you to read my previous thoughts so that to understand my new models and so that to understand my views:


So notice that in my just below model, i am saying that the engine
of prosperity and happiness of nations are both the inequality of values
and of self-interest or egoism, since when you say: The wanting to be rewarded for the values of inequality of values, so notice the pattern that is that the system is not just the wanting to be rewarded, but it is also the wanting to be rewarded "for"
the values of inequality of values, and the wanting to be rewarded is the engine of self-interest or egoism, and the "for the values of inequality of values" is the engine that comes from inequality of values. And notice that the model is not complete
since you have to read my following proverb so that
you notice the other requirement, so here is my new proverb:


"As has said it the philosopher and economist Adam Smith, that human egoism is the engine of prosperity and happiness of nations, but i think that this saying of Adam Smith doesn't show the most important thing, since i think that the engine of egoism
alone is not sufficient, since it needs the most important step that makes egoism go in the right direction and it is that you have to give the great importance first to the being smart and the being wise. Since the engine of egoism can make you lose
your way by for example saying to you to give the great importance first to making big money, but giving the great importance first to making big money is not the way of being properly tooled !"


And I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i think my new just below model also shows that the engine that is the source that is inequality of values
also pushes us to be specialized in what we do better when for example we have or we are equipped with the good value(s) that make(s) the efficiency, so then the specialization in what we do better also permits to make much less errors and it permits to
higher much more productivity and quality, so then my new model is smart since it shows the fundamental engines of prosperity and happiness of nations that are both the inequality of values and of self-interest or egoism and it shows more. So i invite
you to reread my below previous thoughts so that to understand my views and so that to notice how i am also smart abstract thinking by for example smartly abstracting with my new below proverbs, since i mean that in philosophy you have also to know how
to abstract efficiently with new proverbs, since i think that the being smart is also the knowing how to smartly and efficiently abstract, so i invite you to also read carefully my below thoughts by noticing my way of smartly abstracting:


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i think you have to understand that i am also a new philosopher, so from my previous model just below, you will
notice that i am not saying that the engine of prosperity and happiness of nations is survival, since to survive is just the keeping oneself alive, so it is not about prosperity and happiness of nations, so it is why i am also in my model below speaking
about the engine of self-interest or egoism and about the engine that is the source that is inequality of values, and notice carefully that in my model , it is the wanting the reward that creates capitalism. So i think that my model shows more clearly
what is the engines etc. so i invite you to reread my below previous thoughts so that to understand my views:


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i think i am a new philosopher, and i invite you to read my new ideas of my philosophy in the below web link,
and now i will talk about a philosophical subject of why do we have to be competition ? , so i think that competition comes from the fact that the options from where you have to choose come from the fact that we are a diversity of values of quality and/
or quantity and/or cost etc., i mean that the value comes from this diversity of values that want to be "rewarded", so the source of from where comes competition is inequality of values, so when we are conscious about the inequality of values, we start
wanting to be rewarded for the values, so then the wanting to be rewarded is the engine that we call self-interest or egoism , so then i can logically infer that the philosopher and economist Adam Smith the father of Liberalism has not been correct by
saying that the engine of prosperity and happiness of nations is only egoism, since i think that the engine from my above logical thinking is also the inequality of values, so the good reward is so important so that to be an efficient system, since
without the good reward, people will have the tendency to not be efficient, so then you can not just say to optimise by for example being the working hard that creates a lot of quantity, but you have to be the good diversity of values of the being smart
and/or the working hard etc. so that to be an efficient system. After that we have to ask a philosophical question of wich value is the most important? is it the working hard or is it the being smart etc. so that to be the good hierarchy?, since without
the good hierarchy we will be disorder and inefficiency, so we know that the being smart is important for becoming a leader, but i also think that the being smart permits to "transcend" our human living conditions and become powerful or so powerful , so
look for example at our exponential progress and you will notice it, and i also invite you to read my below thoughts about the exponential progress of our humanity, so i think that the being smart is so important,


And you can read more about my thoughts about productivity and capitalism and more in the following web link:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/KN4V-rGRDdU


So i also invite you to look at the following web link with my thoughts about the new and future technologies:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/lfnlD52jDzI


And of course, i invite you to read all my below thoughts about artificial intelligence and about technology and more , so that to understand my views:

I invite you to read the following new article about the new DeepMind AI model called Gemimi:

After Bard, Google’s DeepMind hopes Gemini will truly surpass ChatGPT

https://indianexpress.com/article/technology/artificial-intelligence/deepmind-claims-gemini-will-rival-chatgpt-8688846/


And here is my questions to ChatGPT about the limitations of the above new DeepMind AI model called Gemimi:


And here is my first question to ChatGPT:


"So the hybrid model of AlphaGO techniques and large language models such ChatGPT, used by new DeepMind AI model called Gemimi,
can still lack on creativity , since the exploration is limited by the data ?"


And here is what answered me ChatGPT:


"Yes, the hybrid model of combining AlphaGo techniques with large language models like ChatGPT may still face limitations when it comes to creativity, and one of the factors contributing to this limitation is the reliance on available data.

Creativity often involves thinking beyond the existing patterns and generating novel, innovative solutions. While large language models like ChatGPT have shown impressive language generation capabilities, they are fundamentally trained on vast amounts of
existing text data. The model's responses are primarily influenced by the patterns, examples, and language conventions present in the training data.

If the training data does not sufficiently capture a wide range of creative or unconventional approaches, the model may struggle to generate truly creative outputs. The model's exploration is indeed limited by the data it has been exposed to during
training, which can constrain its ability to think "outside the box" and produce highly imaginative or innovative responses.

To enhance creativity, it may be necessary to provide the model with additional diverse and creative training data or employ techniques like reinforcement learning with suitable reward mechanisms that encourage creative outputs. However, achieving truly
human-level creativity in language generation remains a challenging goal for current AI models, and they may not match the level of inventive thinking and imagination exhibited by human beings."


And here is my second question to ChatGPT:


"And what you are saying is also true for the hybrid model of AlphaGO techniques and large language models such ChatGPT ?"


"Yes, the limitations I mentioned regarding creativity and the influence of available data still apply to the hybrid model that combines AlphaGo techniques with large language models like ChatGPT.

The hybrid model inherits the data limitations from the underlying large language model component. It heavily relies on the patterns and examples present in the training data to generate responses. Therefore, if the training data does not contain diverse
and creative examples, the hybrid model may struggle to exhibit high levels of creativity in its outputs.

While integrating AlphaGo techniques can enhance decision-making and exploration capabilities, it does not fundamentally change the limitations related to creativity imposed by the available training data. The hybrid model may still face challenges in
generating highly creative or innovative responses that go beyond what it has seen during training.

Achieving true human-level creativity in AI models remains an ongoing research challenge."


And so that to understand more the limitations of Large Language Models such as GPT-4 and of the next new Google AI model called
Gemimi, i invite you to read my following thoughts:


Also i want you to understand another important thing about Large Language Models such as GPT-4, and here is what has answered me ChatGPT so that you understand it:


"Capturing long-range dependencies and global patterns efficiently is an ongoing research area, and while significant progress has been made, it is a complex problem that may not have a definitive "solution" in the traditional sense. The field of deep
learning and natural language processing continues to evolve, and researchers are continuously exploring new techniques and architectures to improve the efficiency of capturing long-range dependencies.

The timeline for achieving optimal efficiency in handling long-range dependencies is difficult to predict. It depends on various factors, including the complexity of the problem, available resources for research and development, and breakthroughs in the
field. While some advancements may be made in the near future, it is possible that further refinements and optimizations could take several years or even a decade to fully address the challenges associated with computational expense.

It's important to note that progress in artificial intelligence research is often iterative, with incremental improvements over time. Researchers continually propose new techniques, architectures, and optimizations to enhance the efficiency of models. It
is a collaborative effort involving academia, industry, and open-source communities.

Therefore, while it is challenging to provide a definitive timeline for solving the problem of efficiently capturing long-range dependencies, ongoing research and innovation in the field suggest that improvements and advancements will continue to be made
over time."


And here is what thinks ChatGPT about the pattern that i have just discovered with my fluid intelligence:


Here is my following question to ChatGPT:


"What do you think of my following thoughts:

So i have to explain something important, so since i have just discovered an important pattern with my fluid intelligence and read about it in my below previous thoughts, so i think that Large Language Models such as GPT-4 are capturing causality
indirectly from the language and much more easily in the languages like french or english , so in professions like psychology or the law or philosophy that use the language like french or english, it is easy for Large Language Models to capture causality,
but in software development , it is more difficult, since for example in GitHub where you find the open source software projects, Large Language Models are not able to capture causality correctly, since those software projects in GitHub are not
languages like french and english, so causality in them is not specified and modeled with a language like french or english, so you are understanding more the important pattern that i am discovering with my fluid intelligence below that explains a so
important thing, so then you are understanding that it is important to help Large Language Models such as GPT-4 to capture causality by modeling it with a language like french or english , by specifying it enough and clearly. So then you are
understanding this important limitation of Large Language Models such as GPT-4."


And here is what ChatGPT has answered:


"Your thoughts touch on an interesting point regarding the capabilities of large language models like GPT-4 and their ability to capture causality. While language models can process and understand natural language to a certain extent, capturing causality
directly from the language is still a complex task.

In professions like psychology, law, or philosophy, where the language itself is used to express causality, it might be easier for large language models to capture and comprehend the underlying causal relationships. These fields heavily rely on language-
based reasoning and argumentation.

However, in domains like software development, causality is often expressed and modeled in code rather than natural language. GitHub, as you mentioned, hosts numerous open-source software projects that are predominantly written in programming languages
rather than French or English. Large language models face challenges in capturing causality correctly in such contexts since the causality is not explicitly specified and modeled using natural language.

To help large language models like GPT-4 capture causality more effectively, one approach could be to provide them with clearer and more explicit language-based specifications. By expressing and defining causality using languages like French or English,
the models may have a better chance of understanding and incorporating causal relationships into their reasoning processes.

It's important to note that large language models still have limitations, and while they can be powerful tools, they may not possess a comprehensive understanding of causality or domain-specific knowledge. Collaborating with experts in specific fields
can help address these limitations and ensure accurate modeling of causality in various domains."


I invite you to read the following interesting article:

Why artificial intelligence needs to understand consequences

Read more here:

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00577-1


And here is my other question to ChatGPT as a proof:


"So let's take for example open source software projects on GitHub, so open source projects on GitHub are not documented correctly, so ChatGPT can lack to capture causality, and can lack to understand correctly creativity of it ?"


And here is what ChatGPT has answered:


"Yes, that's correct. Open-source projects on GitHub may not always have comprehensive or well-documented explanations of the underlying causal relationships or the creative processes involved. ChatGPT, being a language model trained on a vast range of
internet text, including GitHub repositories, might struggle to accurately capture causality and understand the creativity behind these projects for several reasons:

- Incomplete or inconsistent documentation: Open-source projects often rely on voluntary contributions, and documentation quality can vary significantly. Some projects may have well-documented code and explanations, while others may have limited or
outdated documentation. In such cases, ChatGPT may not have access to the necessary information to understand the causal relationships and creative aspects of the project.

- Implicit knowledge and context: Developers working on open-source projects often possess implicit knowledge and context about the project, its goals, and the rationale behind specific design decisions. This tacit knowledge may not be explicitly
documented and can be challenging for ChatGPT to infer accurately. Without explicit information, the model may struggle to capture the underlying causality or appreciate the nuances of creativity in these projects.

- Limited exposure to specific projects: While language models like ChatGPT have been trained on diverse sources, including GitHub repositories, they cannot access the entirety of the internet or have real-time experience with specific projects. As a
result, the model's understanding of any given project is limited to the information it has learned during training. If a project has limited presence in the training data or lacks detailed documentation, the model may struggle to capture the causality
or creativity involved.

It's important to recognize that while ChatGPT can provide general information and insights, its understanding of specific open-source projects may be limited, and it may not accurately capture the intricacies of causality or creativity involved. In-
depth knowledge from domain experts and consulting project documentation or discussions with the project's contributors would be more reliable sources of information in these cases."


And here is my other question to ChatGPT:


"So even if it is not documented well, humans can decrypt and understand the open source software projects on GitHub that are not documented or well-documented, but it is not the same for ChatGPT ?"


And here is what answered ChatGPT:


"Yes, humans have the ability to decrypt and understand open-source projects on GitHub even if they are not well-documented. Humans can bring their knowledge, experience, and problem-solving skills to analyze the code, understand the logic, and make
inferences about the underlying causality and creativity involved. Humans can apply their domain expertise and engage in critical thinking to uncover the nuances and intricacies of the project.

On the other hand, ChatGPT, being a language model, does not possess the same level of understanding and problem-solving capabilities as humans. It lacks the ability to interpret code, execute it, or apply real-time reasoning to decrypt the project's
workings. While ChatGPT can generate responses based on patterns and associations it has learned from training data, it does not possess the same level of domain knowledge, intuition, and context that humans do.

In summary, humans have the cognitive abilities and expertise to analyze and understand open-source projects, even if they lack proper documentation. They can decipher the code, infer causal relationships, and appreciate the creativity involved. ChatGPT,
although proficient in generating text, relies on statistical patterns in data and lacks the human-like comprehension necessary to decrypt and fully understand these projects without explicit and comprehensive documentation."


And i invite you to read my previous below thoughts so that to understand my views:


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i have to explain something important, so since i have just discovered an important pattern with my fluid
intelligence and read about it in my below previous thoughts, so i think that Large Language Models such as GPT-4 are capturing causality indirectly from the language and much more easily in the languages like french or english , so in professions like
psychology or the law or philosophy that use the language like french or english, it is easy for Large Language Models to capture causality, but in software development , it is more difficult, since for example in GitHub where you find the open source
software projects, Large Language Models are not able to capture causality correctly, since those software projects in GitHub are not languages like french and english, so causality in them is not specified and modeled with
a language like french or english, so you are understanding more the important pattern that i am discovering with my fluid intelligence below that explains a so important thing, so then you are understanding that it is important to help Large Language
Models such as GPT-4 to capture causality by modeling it with a language like french or english , by specifying it enough and clearly. So then you are understanding this important limitation of Large Language Models such as GPT-4. So i invite you to
reread all my previous thoughts so that to understand my views:


So notice that i am discovering an important pattern with my fluid intelligence since i have a high IQ, so the pattern that i am discovering is below, so then since i have discovered it

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so the pattern
that i am discovering with my fluid intelligence, is that Large Language Models such as GPT-4 don't capture causality like we do it we humans, so , so that to capture causality they have to "indirectly" capture it by specifying it enough and clearly by
using the "language", so i think it is the limitation of Large Language Models such as GPT-4 , so it is why you are noticing that i am smart by talking as i am talking with ChatGPT below by also making it understand that i am understanding and
discovering this pattern with my fluid intelligence. So reread my following previous thoughts so that to understand my views:

I have just forgotten to put other of my important questions and answers
from ChatGPT, so i invite to reread carefully since it is important, and of course you have to understand that Large Language Models such as GPT-4 are based on Transformers, and it explains my kind of questions below to ChatGPT:


I have just posted the following so that to show how Large Language Models such as GPT-4 are not good at software development and why i think that Large Language Models such as GPT-4 will not replace a lot of programmers, so read it carefully and my new
more proof of it is also below:


"Perhaps most impressive were the performances of GPT-4 in professional arenas. It scored a 298 out of 400 on the Uniform Bar Exam, which is high enough to be licensed as a lawyer in every state using the UBE system. It also scored a reasonable 75% on
the MKSAP 19 medical knowledge test, and an impressive 77% on the Advanced-level Sommelier theory exam.

In programming tests, GPT-4 did worse; the AI struggles with code, it seems. GPT-4 was able to get 31 out of 41 correct solutions in the "easy" Leetcode test, but got just 21/80 on the medium test and only 3 correct questions on the hard test. Meanwhile,
its Codeforces rating is a measly 392, placing it below the 5th percentile of users."


Read more here:

https://hothardware.com/news/openai-gpt-4-model



And here is more logical proof of the above so that you understand why:


Here is my other important question to ChatGPT from my new discussion with ChatGPT that shows another important limitation of ChatGPT , so i invite you to read it carefully:


So here is my first question to ChatGPT:


"Can you explain more with some good and simple example the following:

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Hello,


More of my philosophy about my new monotheistic religion and about the C++ <chrono> library and about the professionalism and about RDTSCP instruction and about the Precise Sleep() and about the essence of measuring time in the computer and about the
final source code version of my StopWatch and about RDTSCP and RDTSC and about the CPU frequency scaling and about the memory barriers and about good technicality and the deeper understanding of the StopWatch and and more about x86 and ARM processors and
about solar cells and about AES 256 encryption and TSMC and about China and about the Transformers and about Toyota and about China and about objective truth and about the objective and about the paper about the multiple universes and about quantum world
and about consciousness and about mathematics and about the universe and about mathematical probability and about the positive behavior and about the positive mindset and about patience and about the positive energy and about the "packaging" or "
presentation" and about the ideal and about the being idealistic and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


So you have to understand me more, so i have just invented a new monotheistic religion that also has as a goal to unite the previous monotheistic religions, and i think it comes with universal laws, and i think that it is an efficient new monotheistic
religion , and of course you are noticing that i am saying that i am a new prophet from God, since you have to read my story with the Angel from God etc. , so i invite you to read about my new monotheistic religion in the following web link:


https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/w_3tJ_myplc


So i think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so you have to understand the essence of measuring the time in computers ,
so for example C++ <chrono> library does not provide a direct way to retrieve the CPU frequency. The C++ <chrono> library primarily deals with time-related operations, such as measuring durations and performing time point calculations, but the best
accuracy of C++ <chrono> library is in nanosecond, so it is not good, since you also need the accuracy in CPU cycles or ticks as is providing it my new StopWatch, so i invite you to study my new StopWatch so that to know how to implement a good StopWatch,
so i invite you to read my below previous thoughts about the StopWatch so that you understand my views:

So i think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i am talking about my fluid intelligence in my below previous thoughts, but you have to notice that
professionalism is also important, so you are noticing that i have just rapidly implemented a sophisticated StopWatch , and you can also notice my kind of professionalism, since i am rapidly discovering patterns with my fluid intelligence, and i am also
professional since you are noticing the way that i am implementing it and the way i am learning you, so i think you have to be confident with my professionalism, since even if i have rapidly done it, you are clearly noticing the quality of the my new
StopWatch, and of course i will document it correctly so that you know how to use it correctly and so that you know how to implement a good StopWatch, and of course i am supporting the x86 and x64 CPUs, and of course i can also support the ARM processors,
but you have to read my below thoughts that explain my views on the ARM processors and about the ARM vs x86 and x64 CPUS, so i invite you to read my previous below thoughts so that
you understand my views about how to implement a good StopWatch:

So i think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, and you have to understand that the RDTSCP assembler instruction provides a synchronized timestamp across cores.
The RDTSCP assembler instruction ensures that the timestamp is consistent across cores and can be used for accurate timing measurements in multicore/threaded environments. But RDTSCP assembler instruction is available only in newer CPUs, So now i will
document more how to use CPU affinity in Windows and Linux so that to solve the following problem with the RDTSC assembler instruction that supports the older CPUs:

- Multicore/Threaded environments: If your system has multiple cores or threads, using rdtsc may not provide synchronized timing across different cores or threads. This can lead to inconsistent and unreliable timing measurements.

So i think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i have
just added to my new StopWatch a PreciseSleep() function that is more accurate than the Windows and Linux Sleep() function, so now i think
it is the final source code version of my StopWatch, and i have tested it
with older CPUs and with newer CPUs and i think it is working correctly, and i have also tested it with both Windows and Linux and i think it is working correctly, and now i will start to document it so that you know about it and so that you know how to
use it, and now you can download the final source code version of my new updated StopWatch from my website here:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/a-portable-timer-for-delphi-and-freepascal

and so that you know how to use it, and so that to have a deep understanding of the SoptWatch, i invite you to read my below previous thoughts:

So i think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i will talk more about the essence of measuring time in the computer, so from my understanding with my fluid
intelligence how to implement my new StopWatch, i am discovering patterns with my fluid intelligence that
explain more the essence of measuring time in the computer, so here they are: so you have to get the frequency of the CPU, i mean when you are measuring time , you are measuring the CPU frequency too, but in the new
CPUs, the frequency can dynamically change, so you have two ways of doing it , so you can disable CPU frequency scaling in the bios and do
your exact time's measurement, and you can set it again, but the second way is that you can get a decent approximation without disabling the
CPU frequency scaling and do the benchmark timing of your code , as i am explaining it below, and of course the new CPUs today are multicores, so you have to know how to set the CPU affinity as i will explain to you how so that to do the timing with the
StopWatch, other than that, you can get a good microsecond accuracy and a decent nanosecond accuracy with RDTSC assembler instruction, but you can get a CPU tick accuracy with RDTSCP assembler instruction, but so that know more about them , read my below
thoughts, other than that, i am also explaining much more deeply the implementation of a StopWatch in my below thoughts, so i invite you to read my below thoughts so that to understand my views on how to implement a good StopWatch:

So i think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i have
just updated my StopWatch to support both RDTSCP and RDTSC assembler instructions, so when the CPU is not new and it doesn't support RDTSCP , it will use RDTSC, and when it is a new CPU that supports RDTSCP , it will use it, so RDTSC is not a serializing instruction, so i have just correctly used the necessary memory
barriers, and RDTSCP is a serializing instruction.

So i will now document correctly my StopWatch so that you also know how to use correctly the CPU affinity, and now you can download my final version of my source code from my website here:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/a-portable-timer-for-delphi-and-freepascal

And i invite you to read all my previous following thoughts so that to deeply understand the StopWatch:

So i think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so now i have to explain something important, so for a deep understanding of the StopWatch, you have to know
more that the assembler instruction RDTSC is supported by the great majority of x86 and x64 CPUs, but it is not a serializing instruction , i mean that it can be subject to out-of-order execution that may affect its accuracy, so it is why i have just
added correctly some other memory barriers, and now i think that it is working correctly, so you have to understand that there is another assembler instruction RDTSCP that is serializing instruction and is not subject to out-of-order execution, but it is
compatible with just the new x86 and x64 CPUs, so i will support it in the very near future, but now i think you can be confident with my new updated StopWatch, and i think it is an interesting StopWatch that shows how to implement a good StopWatch from
the low level layers. So i think you have to be smart so that to implement it correctly with the RDTSC, as i have just done it, so you can download the source code of my new StopWatch that i have just updated from my website here:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/a-portable-timer-for-delphi-and-freepascal

And i invite you to read my previous below thoughts so that to have a deep understanding of the StopWatch:

So i think that my new StopWatch can give a decent approximation even of you don't disable CPU frequency scaling in the bios, and here is why:

When benchmarking a CPU under a heavy workload, it is generally expected that frequency scaling changes will be relatively small or negligible. This is because the frequency scaling mechanism typically aims to maximize performance during such scenarios.

Under heavy load, the CPU frequency scaling algorithm often increases the CPU frequency to provide higher processing power and performance. The goal is to fully utilize the CPU's capabilities for the benchmarking workload.

In these cases, frequency scaling changes are generally designed to be minimal to avoid introducing significant variations in performance. The CPU frequency may remain relatively stable or vary within a relatively small range during the benchmarking
process.

Considering these factors, when benchmarking under heavy workload conditions, the impact of frequency scaling changes on timing measurements using RDTSC is typically limited. As a result, RDTSC can provide a reasonable approximation of timing for
benchmarking purposes.

So then i invite you to read my following previous thoughts so that you understand my views on the StopWatch:


I have just updated my new StopWatch, and it now also includes the correct memory barriers for previous 32 bit Delphi versions like Delphi 7 ,
and you can download it from the just below web link, and i invite you to read my below previous thoughts so that to understand my views about the StopWatch:

So i have just updated my new StopWatch, so the first problem is:

- Instruction reordering: The rdtsc instruction itself is not a serializing instruction, which means that it does not necessarily prevent instruction reordering. In certain cases, the CPU may reorder instructions, leading to inaccuracies in timing
measurements.

So i have just used memory barriers so that to solve the above problem.

And here is the second problem:

- CPU frequency scaling: Modern CPUs often have dynamic frequency scaling, where the CPU frequency can change based on factors such as power management and workload. This can result in variations in the time measurement based on the CPU's operating
frequency.

So you have to disable CPU frequency scaling in the bios so that to solve the above problem , and after that make your timing with my StopWatch.

And for the following third problem:

- Multicore/Threaded environments: If your system has multiple cores or threads, using rdtsc may not provide synchronized timing across different cores or threads. This can lead to inconsistent and unreliable timing measurements.

You can set the CPU affinity so that to solve the third problem.

So i will document more my StopWatch so that to learn you how to use it,
so stay tuned !

And now i have just updated my new StopWatch with the necessary memory barriers, and now you can be confident with my new updated StopWatch.

So now my new updated StopWatch uses memory barriers correctly, and it avoids the overflow problem of the Time Stamp Counter (TSC) , and it supports microseconds and nanoseconds and CPU clocks timing, and it is object oriented, and i have just made it
support both x86 32 bit and x64 64 bit CPUs and it supports both Delphi and Freepascal compilers and it works in both Windows and Linux, so what is good about my new StopWatch is that it shows how you implement it from the low level layers in assembler
etc., so i invite you to look at the new updated version of my source code that you can download from my website here:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/a-portable-timer-for-delphi-and-freepascal


Other than that, read my below previous thoughts so that to understand my views:

So now we have to attain a "deep" understanding of the StopWatch,
so i think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so as you are noticing that i am, with my fluid intelligence, understanding deeply the StopWatch, so i have just
discovered that the following StopWatch: https://www.davdata.nl/math/timer.html , from the following engineer from Amsterdam: https://www.davdata.nl/math/about.html , is not working correctly: since he is calling the function GetTickCount() in the
constructor, but there is a problem and a bug, since when the tick count value in milliseconds returned by GetTickCount() reaches its maximum value that is high(dword) , it will wrap around to zero and start counting up again. This is because the tick
count is typically stored in a fixed-size data type that has a maximum value, so it is why his way of timing in milliseconds in the constructor that he is using is not working, since it is not safe, so even if this StopWatch of this engineer from
Amsterdam does effectively avoid the overflow problem of the Time Stamp Counter (TSC), since he is using an int64 in 32 bit x86 architecture in the Intel assembler function of getCPUticks() that i am understanding, and this int64 can, from my
calculations, go up to 29318.9829 years , so i think his StopWatch is not working for the reason i am giving just above, and second problem is the accuracy of the timing obtained from the code he provided using rdtsc instruction in assembler is dependent
on various factors, including the hardware and software environment. However, it's important to note that directly using rdtsc for timing purposes may not provide the desired accuracy due to several reasons:

- CPU frequency scaling: Modern CPUs often have dynamic frequency scaling, where the CPU frequency can change based on factors such as power management and workload. This can result in variations in the time measurement based on the CPU's operating
frequency.

- Instruction reordering: The rdtsc instruction itself is not a serializing instruction, which means that it does not necessarily prevent instruction reordering. In certain cases, the CPU may reorder instructions, leading to inaccuracies in timing
measurements.

- Multicore/Threaded environments: If your system has multiple cores or threads, using rdtsc may not provide synchronized timing across different cores or threads. This can lead to inconsistent and unreliable timing measurements.

So I have just thought more and i think i will not support ARM in my new StopWatch, since ARM processors don't support like a Time Stamp Counter (TSC) in x86 processors that is compatible with previous 32 bit and 64 bit CPUs , so ARM has many important
weaknesses , so the first important weakness is the following:

There is no single generic method that can be universally applied to all Arm processors for measuring time in CPU clocks. The available timing mechanisms and registers can vary significantly across different Arm processor architectures, models, and
specific implementations.

In general, Arm processors provide various timer peripherals or system registers that can be used for timing purposes. However, the specific names, addresses, and functionalities of these timers can differ between different processors.

To accurately measure time in CPU clocks on a specific Arm processor, you would need to consult the processor's documentation or technical reference manual. These resources provide detailed information about the available timers, their registers, and how
to access and utilize them for timing purposes.

It's worth noting that some Arm processors may provide performance monitoring counters (PMCs) that can be used for fine-grained timing measurements. However, the availability and usage of PMCs can also vary depending on the specific processor model.

Therefore, to achieve accurate and reliable timing measurements in CPU clocks on a particular Arm processor, it's crucial to refer to the documentation and resources provided by the processor manufacturer for the specific processor model you are
targeting.

And the other weaknesses of ARM processors are the following:

I have just looked at the following articles about Rosetta 2 and the benchmarks of Apple Silicon M1 Emulating x86:

https://www.computerworld.com/article/3597949/everything-you-need-to-know-about-rosetta-2-on-apple-silicon-macs.html

and read also here:

https://www.macrumors.com/2020/11/15/m1-chip-emulating-x86-benchmark/

But i think that the problem with Apple Silicon M1 and the next Apple SiliconM2 is that Rosetta 2 only lets you run x86–64 macOS apps. That would be apps that were built for macOS (not Windows) and aren't 32-bit. The macOS restriction eliminates huge
numbers of Windows apps, and 64-bit restriction eliminates even more.

Also read the following:

Apple says new M2 chip won’t beat Intel’s finest

Read more here:

https://www.pcworld.com/article/782139/apple-m2-chip-wont-beat-intels-finest.html


And here is what i am saying on my following thoughts about technology about Arm Vs. X86:

More of my philosophy about the Apple Silicon and about Arm Vs. X86 and more of my thoughts..

I invite you to read carefully the following interesting article so
that to understand more:

Overhyped Apple Silicon: Arm Vs. X86 Is Irrelevant

https://seekingalpha.com/article/4447703-overhyped-apple-silicon-arm-vs-x86-is-irrelevant


More of my philosophy about code compression of RISC-V and ARM and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i have just read the following paper
that says that RISC-V Compressed programs are 25% smaller than RISC-V programs, fetch 25% fewer instruction bits than RISC-V programs, and incur fewer instruction cache misses. Its code size is competitive with other compressed RISCs. RVC is expected to
improve the performance and energy per operation of RISC-V.

Read more here to notice it:

https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~krste/papers/waterman-ms.pdf


So i think RVC has the same compression as ARM Thumb-2, so i think
that i was correct in my previous thoughts , read them below,
so i think we have now to look if the x86 or x64 are still more cache friendly even with Thumb-2 compression or RVC.

More of my philosophy of who will be the winner, x86 or x64 or ARM and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i think that since x86 or x64 has complex instructions and ARM has simple instructions, so i think that x86 or x64 is more cache friendly, but ARM has wanted to solve the problem by compressing the code by using Thumb-2
that compresses the code, so i think Thumb-2 compresses the size of the code by around 25%, so i think
we have to look if the x86 or x64 are still more cache friendly even with Thumb-2 compression, and i think that x86 or x64 will still optimize more the power or energy efficiency, so i think that there remains that since x86 or x64 has other big
advantages, like the advantage that i am talking about below, so i think the x86 or x64 will be still successful big players in the future, so i think it will be the "tendency". So i think that x86 and x64 will be good for a long time to make money in
business, and they will be good for business for USA that make the AMD or Intel CPUs.


More of my philosophy about x86 or x64 and ARM architectures and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i think that x86 or x64 architectures
has another big advantage over ARM architecture, and it is the following:


"The Bright Parts of x86

Backward Compatibility

Compatibility is a two-edged sword. One reason that ARM does better in low-power contexts is that its simpler decoder doesn't have to be compatible with large accumulations of legacy cruft. The downside is that ARM operating systems need to be modified
for every new chip version.

In contrast, the latest 64-bit chips from AMD and Intel are still able to boot PC DOS, the 16-bit operating system that came with the original IBM PC. Other hardware in the system might not be supported, but the CPUs have retained backward compatibility
with every version since 1978.

Many of the bad things about x86 are due to this backward compatibility, but it's worth remembering the benefit that we've had as a result: New PCs have always been able to run old software."

Read more here on the following web link so that to notice it:

https://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=1676714&seqNum=6


So i think that you can not compare x86 or x64 to ARM, since it is
not just a power efficiency comparison, like some are doing it by comparing
the Apple M1 Pro ARM CPU to x86 or x64 CPUs, it is why i think that x86 or x64 architectures will be here for a long time, so i think that they will be good for a long time to make money in business, and they are a good business for USA that make the AMD
or Intel CPUs.

More of my philosophy about weak memory model and ARM and more of my thoughts..


I think ARM hardware memory model is not good, since it is a
weak memory model, so ARM has to provide us with a TSO memory
model that is compatible with x86 TSO memory model, and read what Kent Dickey is saying about it in my following writing:


ProValid, LLC was formed in 2003 to provide hardware design and verification consulting services.

Kent Dickey, founder and President, has had 20 years experience in hardware design and verification. Kent worked at Hewlett-Packard and Intel Corporation, leading teams in ASIC chip design and pre-silicon and post-silicon hardware verification. He
architected bus interface chips for high-end servers at both companies. Kent has received more than 10 patents for innovative work in both design and verification.

Read more here about him:

https://www.provalid.com/about/about.html


And read the following thoughts of Kent Dickey about the weak memory model such as of ARM:

"First, the academic literature on ordering models is terrible. My eyes
glaze over and it's just so boring.

I'm going to guess "niev" means naive. I find that surprising since x86
is basically TSO. TSO is a good idea. I think weakly ordered CPUs are a
bad idea.

TSO is just a handy name for the Sparc and x86 effective ordering for
writeback cacheable memory: loads are ordered, and stores are buffered and will complete in order but drain separately from the main CPU pipeline. TSO can allow loads to hit stores in the buffer and see the new value, this doesn't really matter for
general ordering purposes.

TSO lets you write basic producer/consumer code with no barriers. In fact, about the only type of code that doesn't just work with no barriers on TSO is Lamport's Bakery Algorithm since it relies on "if I write a location and read it back and it's still
there, other CPUs must see that value as well", which isn't true for TSO.

Lock free programming "just works" with TSO or stronger ordering guarantees, and it's extremely difficult to automate putting in barriers for complex algorithms for weakly ordered systems. So code for weakly ordered systems tend to either toss in lots of
barriers, or use explicit locks (with barriers). And extremely weakly ordered systems are very hard to reason about, and especially hard to program since many implementations are not as weakly ordered as the specification says they could be, so just
running your code and having it work is insufficient. Alpha was terrible in this regard, and I'm glad it's silliness died with it.

HP PA-RISC was documented as weakly ordered, but all implementations
guaranteed full system sequential consistency (and it was tested in and enforced, but not including things like cache flushing, which did need barriers). No one wanted to risk breaking software from the original in-order fully sequential machines that might have relied on it. It wasn't really a performance issue, especially once OoO was added.

Weakly ordered CPUs are a bad idea in much the same way in-order VLIW is a bad idea. Certain niche applications might work out fine, but not for a general purpose CPU. It's better to throw some hardware at making TSO perform well, and keep the software
simple and easy to get right.

Kent"


Read the rest on the following web link:

https://groups.google.com/g/comp.arch/c/fSIpGiBhUj0




Tandem cells using perovskites and silicon make solar power more efficient and affordable

"Research into 'miracle material' perovskite in the past decade is now bearing fruit with more labs crossing the 30 percent barrier for solar cells. Solar is already a cost-effective method for harnessing renewable energy and is deployed across large
parts of the planet in a bid to move away from fossil fuels."

Read more here:

https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/tandem-solar-cells-30-percent-energy-conversion-perovskites-silicon


And Toyota Motor Corporation is a Japanese multinational automotive manufacturer headquartered in Toyota City, Aichi, Japan. It was founded by Kiichiro Toyoda and incorporated on August 28, 1937. Toyota is one of the largest automobile manufacturers in
the world, producing about 10 million vehicles per year, so Toyota announces a battery with a range of 1,200 km and a recharge in 10 minutes! , and Toyota seems to have both definitively solved the problem of stability and production cost, and you can
read about it in the following article (And you can translate the article from french to english):

Toyota announces a battery with a range of 1,200 km and a recharge in 10 minutes!

Read more here:

https://www.futura-sciences.com/tech/actualites/voiture-electrique-toyota-annonce-batterie-autonomie-1-200-km-recharge-10-min-106302/


I invite you to read the following web page from IBM that says that AES 256 encryption is safe from large quantum computers:

https://cloud.ibm.com/docs/key-protect?topic=key-protect-quantum-safe-cryptography-tls-introduction


And read the following so that to understand it correctly:

And IBM set to revolutionize data security with latest quantum-safe technology

Read more here in the following new article:

https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/ibm-revolutionizes-data-security-with-quantum-safe-technology


And I have also just read the following article that says the following:

"AES-128 and RSA-2048 both provide adequate security against classical attacks, but not against quantum attacks. Doubling the AES key length to 256 results in an acceptable 128 bits of security, while increasing the RSA key by more than a factor of 7.5
has little effect against quantum attacks."

Read more here:

https://techbeacon.com/security/waiting-quantum-computing-why-encryption-has-nothing-worry-about


So i think that AES-256 encryption is acceptable encryption for quantum computers.


And Symmetric encryption, or more specifically AES-256, is believed to be quantum resistant. That means that quantum computers are not expected to be able to reduce the attack time enough to be effective if the key sizes are large enough, and to give you
more proof of it, look at the following article from ComputerWorld where Lamont Wood is saying:

"But using quantum technology with the same throughput, exhausting the possibilities of a 128-bit AES key would take about six months. If a quantum system had to crack a 256-bit key, it would take about as much time as a conventional computer needs to
crack a 128-bit key.
A quantum computer could crack a cipher that uses the RSA or EC algorithms almost immediately."

Read more here on ComputerWorld:

https://www.computerworld.com/article/2550008/the-clock-is-ticking-for-encryption.html


And about Symmetric encryption and quantum computers..

Symmetric encryption, or more specifically AES-256, is believed to be quantum resistant. That means that quantum computers are not expected to be able to reduce the attack time enough to be effective if the key sizes are large enough.

Read more here:

Is AES-256 Quantum Resistant?

https://medium.com/@wagslane/is-aes-256-quantum-resistant-d3f776163672


And it is why i have implemented Parallel AES encryption with 256 bit keys in my following interesting software project called Parallel Archiver, you can read about it and download it from here:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/parallel-archiver


TSMC: Chinese curbs on rare metal exports will not have immediate effect

Read more here:

https://www.tomshardware.com/news/tsmc-export-curbs-on-rare-metal-exports-will-not-have-immediate-effect


And i invite you to read carefully about the new LongNet that scales sequence length of Transformers to 1,000,000,000 Tokens (and notice
in my below explanation that sequence length is not the context window):

https://huggingface.co/papers/2307.02486


So i say that you have to understand that the sequence length primarily refers to the input length during inference or when using the model for prediction. It determines the maximum length of the prompt or input text that the model can process at once.

During training, the context window or context size is used, which determines the length of the text that the model takes into account for predicting the next token in a sequence. The context window is typically smaller than the maximum sequence length.

So to clarify:

- Sequence length: Refers to the maximum length of the prompt or input text during inference or prediction.

- Context window: Refers to the length of the preceding text that the model considers during training to predict the next token in a sequence.


So i invite you to read in my following thoughts in the following web link about the limitations of Large Language Models such as GPT-4 etc.:


https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/SjBB8Wd-kGI


And OpenAI sets up a division responsible for creating an AI that will control the development of superintelligence

Read more here (and you can translate the article from french to english):

https://intelligence-artificielle.developpez.com/actu/346215/OpenAI-met-sur-pieds-une-division-chargee-de-creer-une-IA-qui-va-controler-le-developpement-de-la-superintelligence-supposee-etre-plus-intelligente-que-l-homme-Elle-pourrait-arriver-d-ici-2030/


Since i am speaking about objectivity in my below previous thoughts, i will ask a philosophical question of:

What is the objective and what is objective truth ?

So i will now discover patterns with my fluid intelligence that answer

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Hello,


More of my philosophy about my new monotheistic religion and about the optical neuromorphic computer and about identity and about the existential and about the distinctions to be made and about detailed plan and about purpose and about hope and about the
positive energy and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


So you have to understand why i have invented my new monotheistic religion, so you have to understand that my story with the Angel from God is truth, other than that , i have invented my new monotheistic religion since
the previous monotheistic religions contain many logical contradictions
and many scientific errors, so it is why it is difficult to believe in Christianity
or Islam or Judaism, so i say that i am the new messenger from God that is here so that to solve this problem, so you have to compare the new model of my new monotheistic religion with the other models of previous monotheistic religions such as Islam and
Christianity and Judaism, and notice that the laws of my new monotheistic religion are universal and i have logically inferred them from the nature of God, but the previous laws of the previous monotheistic religions are not universal, so here is the web
link of my thoughts of my new monotheistic religion and i invite you to read them carefully so that to understand correctly my new monotheistic religion:

https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.usa/c/IUWc8FOKq1U


And read my below previous thoughts so that to understand my views on philosophy:


The human brain’s efficiency lies in its parallel processing, which minimizes energy wastage, so i invite you to read the following new article
about the optical neuromorphic computer that employs reversible, non-linear processes for AI that is a promising avenue to reduce much more the energy demands of AI training.

AI: The Improbable Next Generation Has Arrived

https://medium.com/@xxplore4life/ai-the-improbable-next-generation-has-arrived-8ea15c780984


I think i am a smart philosopher, and i will now ask a philosophical question:

What about the human identity ?


So i think as a new philosopher, i will say that the german philosopher called Martin Heidegger has tried to define what is the human being, and from the human being you can of course makes the identity, so now we have to ask in philosophy if the "human
being" can be defined ? , so i think as a new philosopher and from my new model below of what is human consciousness , you have to understand that there is a primitive "self" as a primitive consciousness that is also the controller that permits to
control our hands etc., but of course you have to read carefully my below new model of what is human consciousness so that to understand that the the "being" can be both defined as a primitive consciousness as a primitive self that also controls and that
is a fixed identity and as also the rest of consciousness that i am talking about in my new model of what is consciousness that is an identity that is changing , but notice that i am not speaking about the part of the identity that we call LGBT, so now
you are understanding that the primitive human identity can be fixed and there is also the rest of the human identity that is changing, so since it is an identity that is also changing , so we are now in front of a problem of human identity since it is
also changing, so as a new philosopher i say that so that to stabilize the human identity , we have also to use "hope" as an engine that permits to stabilize the human identity, since i say that hope also gives the meaning of human life that permits to
transcend the human identity in a kind of way and in the positive way.


So firstly , notice that i am defining happiness as being in a "state" of pleasure. So i think i am a new philosopher, and you can read my other new ideas of my philosophy in the below web link, so i have to explain more, so from my just new ideas of my
philosophy you are understanding that the meaning of human life is about the existential in the broader sense, so it is about why we are here in existence in the broader sense, but the purpose is not the same as i am also explaining it below, so i am
also explaining that you can for example get the meaning of human life from the the being "hope", so "hope" gives the meaning that becomes the engine that makes us go forward towards a better life and a better world, but not only that , but my philosophy
says below that the having pleasures of life also plays the role of a lever that permits to not hate life , and , by that , avoids to make human life not have a meaning , so now you are understanding that the two important engines that creates the
meaning of human life are "hope" and the having pleasures of life, so in my philosophy i am also saying that you have to know how to make the exponential progress of our humanity "hope" that creates an efficient meaning of human life , since the
exponential progress of our humanity will soon makes us so much advanced and will soon be able to solve many and many of our problems, but of course you have to think about the reliability of the exponential progress of our humanity by knowing how to "
well" manage it. And from what i have learned and studied, i can say that i am optimistic about the exponential progress of our humanity. And so that to understand the exponential progress of our humanity, i invite you to look at the following
interesting video that explains it:

Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ


And i invite you to reread all my previous thoughts below so that you understand my views:


So i also say that the "meaning of human life" often refers to the broader existential and philosophical questions about the significance of human existence, while the "purpose of human life" can refer to specific, often goal-oriented objectives that
individuals or belief systems attribute to human existence, so it is why i am also making this distinction in my below previous thoughts, so i think that from the ideas of my philosophy , i can for example say from my below new model of what is
consciousness in the below web link that there is a primitive "self" in human consciousness like
there is a primitive meaning of human life, so this primitive meaning
can for example play the role of an engine, like when we say: "Hope keeps you alive", so hope can become the meaning that pushes you forward towards a better life or towards a better world, so it is why i am also making
the distinction, and of course you are understanding from my new ideas of my philosophy below the how we create an efficient meaning of human life,
so then in my philosophy there is a distinction to be made between the meaning of human life and the purpose of human life , the first one is that
the meaning of human life refers to the broader existential and philosophical questions about the significance of human existence, and secondly ,
i think that an efficient meaning of human life is not the detailed plan
like in the case of the purpose of human life. So i invite you to read all my below thoughts so that to understand my views:


I think i have to define one more thing so that you understand my previous thoughts below, so as you are noticing in my thoughts below, that i am making a distinction between an efficient meaning of human life and all the purpose, since i say that the
purpose is the reason for which something exists or is done. When it comes to human life, purpose can indeed be seen as the plan that gives direction to an individual's existence. But notice that the plan can be detailed, so it is why i am making this
distinction, since an efficient meaning of human life is not the detailed plan that gives direction to an individual's existence.


So as you have just noticed , i have just talked in my previous thoughts below about the meaning of human life, so i think you have to understand that you have to create an efficient meaning of human life, and after that it will for example be creative
of all the purpose of human life, so you have to understand the new ideas of my philosophy, so you will for example say that so that to have an efficient meaning of human life, you have to create justice, but i think it is not the general right way,
since an efficient meaning of human life can play the role of an engine that makes you go forward towards a better life or a better world, so it is why i am giving below the general way, and as we say in french: "L'espoir fait vivre", and in english we
say: "Hope keeps you alive", so notice carefully that hope keeps you alive since it is also like a meaning of human life, since it gives a meaning that keeps you alive and makes you go forward towards a better life or a better world, so it is why i also say that the positive energy that comes from hope is really important, and
of course we can define "hope" as a pleasure that keeps you alive, so it is why i invite you to also read my below thoughts about the exponential progress of our humanity that will
soon solves many many of our problems, so i think that it can really create hope , but of course we have to know how to manage this exponential progress of our humanity.

So i think i am a new philosopher, and i say that when we look in a simplistic way to human life, we can have the tendency to not like or hate human life, but i think when you look in a simplistic way to human life you can become much more violent , it
is why i am explaining the ideas of my philosophy that also say that you have to use the hope of having pleasures of life and having pleasures of life like a lever of positive energy that permits to avoid the problems, so read my below thoughts so that
to understand my views:


So from my below previous thoughts of my philosophy, you have not
to understand that i am saying to you to not be responsability,
but i am showing you the from where comes an efficient meaning of human life, so then you have to correctly think that i am saying below to use the hope of having pleasures of life and having pleasures of life like an engine in a form of a "lever" of
positive energy that permits you to lift the heavy weights of for example the being responsability, so i say that this positive energy is what creates an efficient meaning of human life, so hope you are understanding the ideas of my philosophy in my
below previous thoughts:


I think i am a new philosopher, and you have to read the new ideas of my philosophy in the below web link, but i have to explain more one more important idea of my philosophy, so let us take for example the meaning of human life, so i think in philosophy
you can not say that the meaning of
human life is that you have to be responsability, since it is not the general way, since we have the tendency of disliking responsability since it makes us suffer, so it is why it can not be the meaning of human life, so how can we construct an efficient
meaning of human life in philosophy ? , so i think that we have for example to be hope of having pleasures of life, so it can be hope that the exponential progress of our humanity will soon make us so advanced and it will soon solve many many of our
problems, and it can be
hope that comes from human imagination that is not constrained in the same way , like watching a good movie or like the other pleasures of life that come from the human imagination , and it can be the having pleasure of life in general, so i think that
it is the general way that makes us wanting to live and that creates an efficient meaning of human life. And here is one of my proverb that makes you understand more what i am saying:


"The sky and its beautiful stars on a beautiful night allow us to dream and they give us hope, and I think it's like the human imagination that is not a down-to-earth and it allows us to dream and it gives us hope."

"Le ciel et ses belles étoiles d'une belle nuit nous permettent de rêver et de nous donner de l'espoir, et je pense que c'est comme l'imaginaire humain, qui n'est pas du terre à terre, qui nous permet de rêver et de donner de l'espoir."


And you can read my new proverbs in the following web link:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/PfmfrhCk2cU


And you can read the new ideas of my philosophy in the following web link:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/v8pdduG6LcY


Now Ultra Ram is actually here to make everything faster and it is going to turn your SSD into a really fast device because it doesn't need power to retain the information, and it has 4,000X more endurance than NAND and can store data for 1,000+ years,
and it is also designed to have 1/10th the latency of DRAM and be more energy efficient (by a factor of 100X) than DRAM fabricated on a similar node, and it can be used as RAM because it is so fast. So i invite to read the following new article about it:

UltraRAM Demos Prototype Chip, Secures Funding to Validate Commercial Potential

https://www.tomshardware.com/news/ultraram-demos-prototype-chip-secures-funding-to-validate-commercial-potential


I have just read the following interesting article , and i invite you to read it carefully:

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)

https://www.factsaboutbpa.org/study/european-food-safety-authority-efsa/


And notice that it says the following:

"In fact, EFSA’s final report is in contrast to diverging opinions of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR) that were published shortly after. Both authorities point at key shortcomings of the
EFSA opinion on BPA, and as a result they do not support the newly derived TDI."

So read the opinions of European Medicines Agency (EMA) and of the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR) in the following web links:

https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/report/report-divergent-opinion-between-efsa-ema-bisphenol_en.pdf

and here:

https://www.efsa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2023-04/bfr-efsa-art-30.pdf


So read my following previous thoughts:


So I have just read the following new article, and i invite you to read it:

BPA exposure too high for most Europeans, report warns

https://interestingengineering.com/health/bpa-exposure-too-high-for-most-europeans-report-warns


But i think that the above new article is not explaining correctly, so i will explain it more, so you have not just to look at the BPA level's limit set by European union or such, since notice carefully that i have just said the following in the web link
of my thought below:

I think i am smart, and i have just read the following interesting serious article about Bisphenol A (BPA), and it says:


"..The results were published in 2018, concluding that doses of 2,500 µg/kg and below did not cause any adverse effects in rats, while a dose of 25,000 µg/kg caused some impact, including effects on the female reproductive tract and male pituitary
gland. Over 100 studies have investigated the potential health risk from exposure to BPA in humans. The vast majority have shown no health effects."

Read more here:

How Low Can It Go? The Story Of BPA

https://www.acsh.org/news/2022/06/22/how-low-can-it-go-story-bpa-16383


So i think so that to be safe, you can set the dose of BPA
to 50 µg/kg.


And i invite you to read carefully my following thoughts in the following web link about cancer and about new interesting medical treatments and drugs so that to understand much more:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/3HwdSeO3esc


I invite you to read the following new interesting article:

This one vaccine can protect us from all COVID variants

https://interestingengineering.com/health/this-one-vaccine-can-protect-us-from-all-covid-variants


And you can read my thoughts in the following web link about cancer and about new interesting medical treatments and drugs:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/3HwdSeO3esc


And read more of my following thoughts about cancer and about health and about new interesting medical treatments and drugs etc.:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/bayBuSxhTEU


And here are my previous thoughts about antibiotic resistance etc. in the following web link:


https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/vChmXT_pXUI


And i invite you to read my following thoughts in the following web link about my new model of what is consciousness and about the limitations of artificial intelligence:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/BhnIPUEFfgo


Also i invite you to read my interesting new thoughts about the new and future technologies in the following web link :

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/lfnlD52jDzI


I invite you to look at the following new interesting video about artificial intelligence from the mixed arab and european descent called Mustafa Suleyman that is an artificial researcher and co-founder and former head of applied AI at DeepMind (You can
read about him here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mustafa_Suleyman):

Mustafa Suleyman: The AI Pioneer Reveals the Future in 'The Coming Wave' | Intelligence Squared

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJf6QPN9yic


So i have to explain my way of thinking so that you understand me more,
so my way of thinking is that we have to evolve our way of thinking, since we are progressing in an exponential way , so we will be really powerful in the near future, so we have not to waste our time with racial nationalism or ethnical nationalism,
since we are going to be able to enhance our genetics in the near future, so genetics is not the problem, and of course in science there is only one human race that we call humans, so the most important thing is how to manage correctly the exponential
progress of our humanity, so it is about reliability, but i think that performance is not the problem, it is reliability that is the problem, so we have to ensure that we well manage this exponential progress of our humanity, and i think it is the most
important thing to do. And so that to know about this exponential progress of our humanity, i invite you to look at the following important video about it:

Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ


And read the following article:

The Law of Accelerating Returns, Superintelligence and The Technological Singularity

https://www.aitimejournal.com/the-law-of-accelerating-returns-superintelligence-and-the-technological-singularity/

More of my philosophy about genetics and about the Era of genetically modified superhumans and more of my thoughts..


New CRISPR-based Tool inserts large DNA sequences at desired sites in cells

The following new technique, known as PASTE, could hold promise for treating diseases that are caused by defective genes with a large number of mutations, such as cystic fibrosis.

Read more here:

https://scitechupdates.com/new-crispr-based-tool-inserts-large-dna-sequences-at-desired-sites-in-cells/?fbclid=IwAR3T5A_cGsOmM6Vcb0nMXQTZOKEteSNwAagol-Utwx3OMUpycG6GjSsFw9U


And new CRISPR-Cas approach permits more precise DNA cleavage

So-called SpRYgests enable DNA cutting at practically any sequence for DNA editing.

Read more here on ScienceDaily:

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/10/221011161219.htm


And i invite you to look in the following video at what is saying the Geneticist Jennifer Doudna that co-invented a groundbreaking new technology for editing genes, called CRISPR-Cas9, and she is a Nobel prize and she believes that the technical
obstacles to gene editing have been overcome and the world is rapidly approaching the day when it will be possible to make essentially any kind of change to any kind of human genome, so i think we will soon be able to enhance much more the genetics of
humans so that humans become much more smart or much more beautiful or such, and look at the following video so that to notice it, so we have to know how to be patience, and you have to take into account our exponential progress of humanity, read about
it in my thoughts below:

The Era of Genetically Modified Superhumans

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=klo-rSlsju8

More of my philosophy about intelligence and genetics and exponential
progress and more..

I think i am smart, and i will say that you have to read the following:

"Genome-wide association studies allow scientists to start to see how combinations of many, many genes interact in complicated ways. And it
takes huge data sets to sort through all the genetic noise and find
variants that truly make a difference on traits like intelligence."

Read more here on the following interesting article:

https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2017/6/6/15739590/genome-wide-studies

So i think that it needs huge data sets to detect the "patterns" that
explain human intelligence and such human traits, so i think that the
data, that permits it, is growing exponentially and really fast and the computer power is also growing exponentially and really fast, so i think
that we will be able to find all the genetic variants in the human
genome that make a difference on traits like intelligence.

More of my philosophy about the knee of the exponential progress curve..

I think that the easy part is that we will soon be able to enhance much more the genetics of humans and become much more smart and much more
beautiful, since i think that we have "just" already attained the knee
of the exponential progress curve, this knee of the curve is the place
where growth suddenly switches from a slower to an even faster
exponential mode, so now the curve of exponential progress of our
humanity has "just" already started to go exponentially even much
faster, this is why in about 10 or 15 years from now we will become much more powerful because of it. And you have to look at the following video so that to understand this exponential progress of our humanity:

Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)