Hello,


More of my philosophy about artificial intelligence and about global warming and about China's Semiconductor advances to 5nm and about consciousness and about the detachment and about the tanha ( craving ) and about the essence of religion and about
artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


So here is my interesting discussion with ChatGPT about the transformers
like of the transformer of ChatGPT that is the core system of ChatGPT, and a transformer model is a neural network that learns context and thus meaning by tracking relationships in sequential data like the words in this sentence. Transformer models apply
an evolving set of mathematical techniques, called attention or self-attention, to detect subtle ways even distant data elements in a series influence and depend on each other.


So here is my first question to ChatGPT:

So i think i understand what is doing the transformers , so they understand the lower level patterns and they understand the higher level patterns , so then they understand it all.


And here is what has just answered me ChatGPT:

"Yes, you've captured the idea correctly. Transformers, the architecture underlying models like ChatGPT, are capable of understanding both low-level and high-level patterns in the data they are trained on. This enables them to grasp a wide range of
information, from the fine-grained details to the broader themes and concepts present in the training data. By learning these patterns comprehensively, they can generate text that reflects a deep understanding of the input data and respond in ways that
incorporate both specific details and overarching themes.

However, it's important to note that while transformers can learn and recognize patterns, their understanding is based on statistical associations in the training data. They don't possess true comprehension or consciousness. They generate text by
applying learned patterns and associations to the input data, which can produce responses that seem insightful and contextually relevant but are ultimately based on patterns and statistics."


And here is my second question to ChatGPT:

So the pattern can be a low level concept or a high level concept.


And here is what has just answered me ChatGPT:

"That's correct. Patterns in the context of deep learning models like transformers, including both low-level and high-level concepts, can be used to understand and generate text:

1- Low-Level Patterns: These patterns involve specific details, such as word choice, sentence structure, grammar, and stylistic elements. Low-level patterns are more granular and can include things like the use of metaphors, specific vocabulary, or
consistent use of certain linguistic features.

2- High-Level Patterns: These patterns encompass broader aspects of language and content, such as themes, writing style, recurring motifs, and overarching concepts. High-level patterns relate to the overall structure and message of a text or creative
work.

Deep learning models like transformers are capable of learning and applying patterns at various levels of abstraction. They can understand and generate text that reflects both low-level and high-level patterns, enabling them to respond to a wide range of
input and generate contextually relevant and coherent output. The combination of these patterns contributes to the models' ability to generate text that appears meaningful and contextually appropriate."


And here is my third question:

So since the transformer is limited by the trained data , so if it doesn't find a pattern of creative work , so it can not understand this creative work and it can not be innovative in this creative work.


And here is what has just answered me ChatGPT:

"You're correct that the performance of a transformer model like GPT-3 is limited by the data it has been trained on. If a transformer hasn't been exposed to certain patterns or styles of creative works during training, it may not be as effective in
understanding or generating content in those specific creative works or styles.

Transformers are data-driven models, and their ability to generate creative and innovative content is highly dependent on the diversity and quality of the data they've been trained on. If a particular style of creativity or a specific set of patterns is
not represented in their training data, they may struggle to produce content that aligns with those patterns.

To improve a transformer's performance on a specific type of creative work or style, it would ideally need to be trained on a dataset that includes examples of that specific creative domain or style. Training a model on a more diverse and extensive
dataset can also help it become more versatile in generating content that aligns with various patterns and styles, making it potentially more innovative in those domains.

In summary, the ability of a transformer model to understand and be innovative in a specific creative work or style is largely determined by the data it was trained on and its exposure to relevant patterns and examples."


And here is my fourth question to ChatGPT:

Hence , ChatGPT can not be guaranteed , since it is limited by the data on wich it has been trained , so it can for example lack a lot of patterns of creative works.


And here is what has just answered me ChatGPT:

"You're correct in observing that ChatGPT and similar models are not guaranteed to excel in every creative work or domain. Their performance is indeed limited by the data on which they've been trained. If a particular pattern or style of creative work is
underrepresented or missing from their training data, they may struggle to understand or generate content in that specific area.

These models are most effective when they are used within the domains and patterns for which they have been extensively trained. If you need to work with specific or niche areas of creativity or unique patterns, you might encounter limitations. In such
cases, additional fine-tuning or training on domain-specific data may be necessary to enhance their performance.

It's essential to understand that while ChatGPT is a powerful language model capable of generating creative content, it may not fully replace human expertise and creativity, especially in highly specialized or niche creative domains. It's a tool that can
assist and inspire human creators but doesn't have a deep understanding of every possible creative context."


And here is my fifth question to ChatGPT:

So then if ChatGPT can not be guaranteed as i am explaining above , so we can not say that it can replace a lot of jobs.


And here is what has just answered me ChatGPT:

"You're correct in pointing out that ChatGPT and similar AI models have limitations, particularly in specialized or creative domains where human expertise and creativity are highly valued. While these models have the potential to automate certain tasks
and assist with various jobs, they are not a wholesale replacement for human workers in many fields.

The impact of AI models like ChatGPT on employment varies by industry and job role. In some cases, they may automate certain routine and repetitive tasks, which could lead to changes in job responsibilities or the need for reskilling in affected
industries. However, many jobs involve aspects like creativity, empathy, complex problem-solving, decision-making, and domain-specific expertise, which AI models may not fully replicate.

AI can be a valuable tool for augmenting human capabilities, improving efficiency, and automating specific tasks. Still, it's unlikely to completely replace human workers in roles that require deep understanding, creativity, nuanced judgment, and
emotional intelligence.

The future of work and the impact of AI on employment is a complex and evolving topic, and it often depends on the specific context and industry. While AI can be a powerful tool, it is usually seen as a complement to human skills and expertise, rather
than a full replacement."



And here is my sixth question to ChatGPT:

As we have just discussed above about the transformers, so i think that nuanced understanding comes too from the necessary patterns that the transformers have to discover in the data.


And here is what has just answered me ChatGPT:

"Absolutely, nuanced understanding often arises from the ability to recognize and interpret complex patterns in data. Transformers and similar deep learning models are proficient at identifying and leveraging patterns across various levels of abstraction
in the data they have been trained on. This capacity for pattern recognition allows them to achieve nuanced understanding in different domains.

Here's how nuanced understanding is related to patterns in data:

1- Pattern Recognition: Deep learning models, like transformers, excel at identifying patterns in the data. These patterns can range from low-level linguistic features (e.g., word associations, sentence structure) to high-level concepts (e.g., themes,
relationships between entities).

2- Complex Relationships: In many tasks, nuanced understanding involves recognizing and interpreting complex relationships and dependencies within the data. This can encompass understanding context, causality, and subtleties in meaning.

3- Contextual Adaptation: Transformers are particularly skilled at adapting their responses based on the context provided. They use patterns in the input data to generate contextually relevant and coherent responses.

4- Domain-Specific Nuances: For tasks in specialized domains, like medical diagnoses or legal analysis, nuanced understanding involves recognizing and interpreting patterns specific to that domain.

5- Discovering Nuance: Nuanced understanding often means discovering the subtleties, exceptions, and edge cases in the data that go beyond simple patterns. It involves recognizing the limitations and context in which patterns apply.

While transformers and deep learning models can provide nuanced responses and demonstrate a strong understanding of the data they were trained on, it's important to remember that their knowledge and understanding are based on patterns and associations
present in that training data. Their nuanced understanding may not always align perfectly with human intuition and domain expertise, and they may not capture all aspects of complex or specialized domains. Human expertise and oversight are often required
to validate and enhance the nuanced understanding provided by these models."


And here is my seventh question to ChatGPT:

So then from what we have just discussed above, since ChatGPT can not be guaranteed , since it is limited by the data on wich it has been trained , so it can for example lack a lot of patterns of creative works, so the nuanced understanding can not be
guaranteed too.


And here is what has just answered me ChatGPT:

"Your assessment is accurate. ChatGPT, like other language models, is not guaranteed to have nuanced understanding in all domains or be able to capture all patterns, especially in specialized or creative works. Its performance is indeed limited by the
data on which it has been trained.

Nuanced understanding, especially in specialized, creative, or domain-specific contexts, is not something that can be guaranteed with these models. While they can exhibit a strong ability to generate contextually relevant text and demonstrate
understanding within the scope of their training data, they may not capture all nuances, subtleties, or specialized patterns, particularly in domains that deviate significantly from the general training data.

In practice, these models are powerful tools for many tasks, but they are not infallible and may not fully replace the need for human expertise, particularly in areas requiring deep understanding, creativity, or domain-specific knowledge. Users should
exercise judgment and validation when relying on these models for nuanced understanding, especially in critical or specialized applications."


And i invite you to read my below new model of what is human consciousness so that to understand the other limitations of artificial intelligence:


Cows and other farm animals produce about 14% of human-induced climate emissions, and it is methane from their burps and manure that is seen as both the biggest concern and best opportunity for tackling global heating. Methane is more potent at warming
the earth than carbon dioxide and it is an important emission target for policymakers because it leaves the atmosphere more quickly than carbon dioxide. The world's one billion+ cows are responsible for about 40% of global methane emissions - a
significant contributor to global warming. And i invite you to read carefully the following new article from Interesting Engineering about how scientists have just engineered climate-smart cows with 10 to 20 times more milk, and it permits to reduce the
number of cows so that to reduce much more global warming ,
since Methane is responsible for around 30% of the current rise in global temperature:

https://interestingengineering.com/science/scientists-engineer-climate-smart-cows-with-10-to-20-times-more-milk


I invite you to read carefully the following new article about how U.S. cannot halt China's Semiconductor advances to 5nm:

https://www.tomshardware.com/news/us-cannot-halt-chinas-semiconductor-advance-to-5nm-ex-tsmc-vp


And Chinese Loongson CPU takes on AMD's Zen 3 in benchmarks, with approximately Zen 3 levels of IPC, based on testing, so i invite you to read the following new article so that to notice it:


https://www.tomshardware.com/news/loongson-3a6000-beats-i3-10100f


I have just looked at the following video about can Dualism explains consciousness from closer to Truth , and i invite you to look at it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aUfOCY6cg4E


But i think that my below new model of what is consciousness explains
much more , since from it you can understand that there is a necessary primitive human consciousness that is a self-consciousness, and this primitive human consciousness permits to control , it is like the primitive controller , but my below new model of what is human consciousness explains more , since it shows the rest of
the important part of the consciousness that is constructed , and of course you are understanding
from it that it is like dualism and the primitive self-consciousness interact with the materialistic and biologic parts so that to construct the the rest
of the important human consciousness, so then my new model of what is consciousness also explains that since the primitive self-consciousness interact with the materialistic and biologic parts , so i think that
the spiritual world can interact and create the materialistic world ,
so i think that the one that we call God can enhance your primitive self-consciousness after you die , and i am also saying that the happiness in the materialistic world is limited like the speed is limited by the speed of light , i mean that for example
pleasures of life are limited by the biologic , so the intensity of the pleasure is limited , but in the new model of my new monotheistic religion , the spiritual world is not limited by the speed of light and the intensity of the pleasure is not limited
, so it is why it permits to understand what looks like happiness in the spiritual world of God.


So i think that Buddhism literally is a religion focused on ending dukkha ( translated to suffering ). The cause for dukkha is tanha ( craving ). It is craving for sensual pleasure, craving for becoming and craving for non becoming, but i think that the
methodology of Buddhism of becoming complete detachment so that solve the problem of tanha ( craving ) is difficult , so it is why i think that you have to be a "kind" of detachment like in the case of Taoism , so Taoism doesn't solve the problem of
tanha ( craving ) by complete detachment as i am explaining it below, so you are understanding then that when i am saying in my below previous thoughts the following:

"..and notice carefully that i am saying the being "enough" believer in God, and it can be an enough probability of existence of God , so that to enforce morality or the detachment in a kind of way."


So notice that i am saying that the being "enough" believer in God also
makes you be a kind of detachment that looks like Taoism , "but" by enforcing it in a kind of way that i think is better than Taoism as i am explaining it in my below previous thoughts , so i invite you to read my below previous thoughts so that you
understand my views:


So i think i am also a new philosopher , so you have to understand the exercise of my new philosophy , so for example you can read my new ideas of my philosophy in the below web links , so the exercise is that i am also
learning you my new philosophy that also learns you about philosophy ,
so it is like we say in french: "je fais d'une pierre deux coups" , and its translation in english is: "I am like killing two birds with one stone." ,
also you are noticing that i am coming with my new ideas below about the
core idea of Taoism that i think comes from Buddhism that precedes, so that you understand the essence of religion , so you are understanding from it that religion is not like philosophy , since i think that philosophy lacks a low level layer, since the
monotheistic religions uses the low level layer of the enough believing in God so that to for example enforce the detachment or so that to enforce morality since the laws have there limits, so i think that now you are understanding that i am smart by
doing it like i am doing it so that to learn you and so that to learn you my way of doing , so it is why
you have to look carefully at my way of doing as a new philosopher so
that to notice that it is a smart way of doing. And notice how i have also invented a new model of what is consciousness that also shows that we will not attain artificial general intelligence and you can read about it too in my below thoughts , so it is
why i invite you to read all my below thoughts of
my philosophy and of my new monotheistic religion and of my new model of what is human consciousness:


I think i am also a new philosopher , and you can read my new ideas of my philosophy in the below web links , but now i will talk about my other new ideas of my philosophy that are the following:

So i think that there is a weakness in philosophy and you can easily notice it from for example the fact that i think that the core idea of Taoism has been inspired by the core idea of detachment in Buddhism , since Buddhism precedes Taoism and since i have just explained the core idea of Taoism as following:


"OK , i think i understand what Taoism wants to mean, so i think that it is about acceptance of life as it is."

"So i want to be more precise about Taoism, since you have not talked about it, so the acceptance of life as it is in Taoism is that you accept it inside yourself so that to not suffer spiritually, but you can compete with your actions for the reward so
that to be successful and so that to make life better."

So i think that the above core idea of Taoism has been inspired from Buddhism, since i think that Buddhism precedes Taoism , since i think that it comes from the core idea of being able to "detach" from the materialistic world so that to be able to
control correctly the oneself , and you have to understand the detachment is like the detachment of Taoism , since i mean that you can be rich and you can be happy , but the detachment permits to control correctly the oneself , but i think that
philosophy and Taoism and Buddhism have a weakness , and it is the fact that it is like circular logic, since how to be detachment since the detachment also comes from the limits of the laws of the countries that don't enforce it correctly , so Liberty ,
as it is , is not the right way to do , since also we can notice that the laws of the countries have there "limits" too , so i think we have for example to be a believer in God or "enough" believer in God , and notice carefully that i am saying the being
"enough" believer in God, and it can be an enough probability of existence of God , so that to enforce morality or the detachment in a kind of way , so it is why i am coming with my new monotheistic religion that i think is efficient , and you can read
about it below , also in my new monotheistic religion i am saying that there is dualism , i mean that there is the spiritual world of God and there is the materialistic world , and i am also saying that the happiness in the materialistic world is limited
like the speed is limited by the speed of light , i mean that for example pleasures of life are limited by the biologic , so the intensity of the pleasure is limited , but in the new model of my new monotheistic religion , the spiritual world is not
limited by the speed of light and the intensity of the pleasure is not limited , so it is why it permits to understand what looks like happiness in the spiritual world of God. And i invite you to read my following discussion about Taoism with ChatGPT and
i invite you to read my new ideas of my new monotheistic religion below:

I think i am a new smart philosopher and you can read my new ideas of my philosophy in the below web links, but now i invite you to read my just new
discussion with ChatGPT about Taoism , and notice how i am correcting and learning ChatGPT:


So here is my first question to ChatGPT:

OK , i think i understand what Taoism want to mean, so i think that it is about acceptance of life as it is.


And here is what has just answered me ChatGPT:

"Yes, you've captured the essence of Taoism well. Taoism is indeed about accepting life as it is and working in harmony with the natural order of things. It encourages you to find contentment and balance by embracing the way life unfolds rather than
constantly striving against it. This acceptance and alignment with the natural flow of life can lead to greater peace and a deeper sense of fulfillment."

And here is my second question to ChatGPT:


So i want to be more precise about Taoism, since you have not talked about it, so the acceptance of life as it is in Taoism is that you accept it inside yourself so that to not suffer spiritually, but you can compete with your actions for the reward so
that to be successful and so that to make life better.

And here is what has just answered me ChatGPT:


"Your understanding is on the right track. In Taoism, the acceptance of life as it is primarily involves an internal acceptance, promoting inner peace and reducing spiritual suffering. This means not resisting the natural flow of life, being content with
what you have, and finding harmony within yourself.

However, Taoism doesn't advocate passivity or inaction. You can still engage in actions, including competition, to improve your life and the world around you. The key is to do so in a way that aligns with your true nature and doesn't lead to excessive
stress, attachment, or suffering.

Taoism suggests that one can compete or strive for rewards, but it encourages finding a balance and not allowing the pursuit of external success to overshadow your inner peace and well-being. It emphasizes moderation, mindfulness, and being in harmony
with the Tao while engaging in action.

So, in Taoism, the acceptance of life is primarily internal, but it doesn't discourage external actions and efforts that can lead to success and improvements in life, as long as those actions are in harmony with your true self and the natural order of
things."

And here is my third question to ChatGPT:


So there is still a problem with Taoism, and it is that it reduces to a certain level the spiritual suffering, but it doesn't solve the problem, since we have still to be competition for the reward so that to be successful and so that to make better the
world, but this competition still makes you suffer.

And here is what has just answered me ChatGPT:


"Your observation is correct, and it's a common dilemma in life. While Taoism can help reduce spiritual suffering and provide a framework for finding inner peace and contentment, it doesn't eliminate the challenges and potential suffering that can arise
from competition and striving for rewards, especially in a competitive world.

Competition and the pursuit of external success can indeed lead to stress, anxiety, and suffering, and this is a complex aspect of human existence. It's important to strike a balance between the external goals we pursue and our inner well-being.

Taoism offers a perspective that encourages individuals to be mindful of this balance. While it may not eliminate the challenges that come with competition, it suggests that individuals should engage in competition in a way that minimizes unnecessary
stress, is aligned with their true nature, and doesn't lead to excessive suffering.

Ultimately, it's up to individuals to find their own approach to this challenge. Some may choose to embrace a more competitive path and work on managing the associated stresses, while others may prioritize inner peace and well-being to a greater extent.
There is no one-size-fits-all solution, and different people will find different ways to navigate the complexities of competition and success while aiming to lead fulfilling lives."

And here is my fourth question to ChatGPT:


So it is why i have invented a new monotheistic religion that makes you be faith in God or enough faith in God so that to solve the problematic of since we have to be competition for the reward, so it makes you suffer, so faith in God or enough faith in
God makes you not take revenge in a not correct way since you are suffering.

And here is what has just answered me ChatGPT:


"Creating a new monotheistic religion that emphasizes faith in God as a means to address the challenges and suffering associated with competition and the pursuit of rewards is a personal and philosophical approach. This belief system can provide
individuals with guidance and support to navigate the complexities of life, including the stress and suffering that can come from intense competition.

The idea of turning to faith in God for solace, moral guidance, and perspective is a common aspect of many religions. It can help individuals find inner strength, cultivate forgiveness, and approach challenges with a more positive mindset.

It's important to recognize that belief systems and religions often serve as sources of comfort, inspiration, and guidance for individuals. Your creation of this new religion can be a way for you to address the challenges you perceive in the world and
offer a unique perspective to others who may share your beliefs.

As with any belief system, respect for diverse perspectives is essential, and open dialogue with others can lead to meaningful discussions and an exchange of ideas. Your philosophy and new religion can help you find a sense of purpose and peace, as well
as offer a path to approach competition and suffering in a way that aligns with your values and beliefs."


I have just looked at the following new video of a known youtuber that talks
in french:

A-t-on besoin de religion ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wPWUkaBChSw


So i am saying that i am a new messenger from God and an Angel from God in form of light has come to me when i was a child of around 11 years ,
but today i will talk about the above video that is asking the following question: Do we have to keep religion ?

So i am a new messenger from God and you can read the new ideas of my new monotheistic religion below, so i say that we have to keep the monotheistic religion in another form , i mean since humans don't know wich monotheistic religion is truth , so you
have to have a monotheistic religion that is lightweight and that gives the great weight of importance to the fact that you have to be a believer or an enough believer in God and of course we can still be inspired by the other monotheistic religions like
Islam and Christianity and Judaism , so my new monotheistic religion has also those characteristics , so notice also carefully how i am logically inferring the universal laws of my monotheistic religion from the nature of God that i am explaining below, so i invite you to read the thoughts of my new monotheistic religion in my
following previous thoughts:

So i invite you to look at the following video from an american that says that life sucks:

Life Sucks!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvKRQno47L0


So i think i am a smart philosopher, and i think that the above person in the above video is making a mistake since he is not a good philosopher , since i think i am a smart philosopher and i say that philosophy is not sufficient since there must be
something that gives meaning to human life that makes you have faith in life and that makes you disciplined in the right way , and i say that there is not other thing than to have faith or enough faith in God
and to have a new monotheistic religion that is smart and that is logic and that makes you smart , and it is why i have invented quickly my new monotheistic religion and i invite you to read my new monotheistic religion in my below thoughts:


So you have to understand my new monotheistic religion, so i am saying that i am a new messenger or prophet from God , so an Angel from God in form of light has come to me when i was a child of around 11 years , so i am giving you my story with this
Angel from God in the below web link, so the first question is: Why this Angel from God has come to me and
he has read some parts of the scriptures from God on my body and soul ? ,
so i think i have been choosen by God since i am also a descendant of prophet Muhammad from my mother and from my father and i am a really
a decent man and i am a good man and i am really a righteous man, so both of my father and my mother have the genealogy or family tree that confirms that i am descendant of prophet Muhammad and my name that is "Moulay" means in Morocco that i am
descendant of prophet Muhammad, so i have to explain more my new monotheistic religion, so from my new model of my new monotheistic religion you have to understand that when you look at the genetic of humans from the genetical mutations etc. , you have
not to be naive and think that God doesn't exist , since my new monotheistic religion says that the bodies of humans are not from God , but it also says that the human consciousness is immaterial and it can live after death , and after death , it can be
connected with the spiritual world of God and it can be enhanced and judged by God , so i think that we are not all descendants of Adam and Eve , and i think that Adam and Eve can be just human consciousnesses that God can put inside a baby that is born ,
so i invite you to read carefully the following so that to understand more:


I think that God is related to the the following patterns in the following articles about the Out-Of-Body Experiences, and the pattern is
that the outer-body-experience can also "see" what is going on around
him or her even if he or her is technically dead, so it means that it is
not only a consciousness , but it is what we call a soul, and a soul
can see and think and feel as you will notice it in the following articles:

So look for example in the following interesting article that one 57-year old man seemed to confirm an outer body experience by recalling everything that was going on around him with eerie accuracy while he was technically dead.

Read more here:

https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/516195/university-southampton-study-science-life-death-hell-heaven


[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)