Niagara Falls Bridge "Terrorism" - NOT !
From
56d.1153@21:1/5 to
All on Fri Nov 24 00:32:35 2023
XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.politics.usa, alt.elections
The MSM was really quick to call this "terrorism",
WAY too quick.
A car - actually a VERY expensive Bentley - approached
the border crossing at extremely high speed. It struck
an obstacle and went airborne - in flames - crashing
into some facilities owned by the Border Patrol. There
were two people inside, both killed. Apparently they
were man and wife.
The explosive look-n-feel immediately spawned the
"terrorism" angle, but in fact it was all just
because the gas tank split open from the impact.
The most likely causes ... "medical problem" with the
driver - it happens - or "suicide run" - also happens.
The money is on the driver having a heart attack or
seizure and planting his foot firmly on the accelerator.
The real cause may never be known for sure because of
how destructive the accident was. But it WASN'T
"terrorism".
The MSM is *drooling* for a Hamas-related terrorist
event ... blood is how it makes its money.
There MAY be such incidents in our near future, but
not today. Rather doubt it'll be setting fire to
some obscure bridge either ...
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)