XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.society.liberalism, talk.politics.misc XPost: alt.politics.republicans
On 2/2/24 2:14 AM, Progressive wrote:
On 26 Feb 2022, Lefty Lundquist <lefty_lundquist@ggmail.com> posted some news:svdrd9$u4f$12@dont-email.me:
The wigger mother was jealous because the driver didn't offer her any
dick.
A Union County family is pushing for answers after allegedly seeing a delivery driver record their teenaged daughter over the weekend.
Investigators originally told the family they’re not able to do much in this case.
It's probably not actually illegal. Anyone who comes
out in 'public' is fair game for videos/photos.
You'd have to prove ill-intent.
Delivery drivers - and I *know* Amazon - always take
photos of the packages AT their destination. If a
human happens to take the packages then they get
in the photo too. It's how the drivers/company
cover their asses - "See, we DID deliver it to ... !"
IMHO, this particular complaintant either does not
understand how any of this works OR is looking for
a Deep Pocket to rob.
I think "Deep Pocket" lawsuits and such should be
basically illegal - they undermine SO much that's
beneficial to the rest of us, raise prices, damage
services. If it even smells of "Deep Pocket" it
should be rejected immediately.
"Class action" ... LOTS of people complaining ...
those should get a second look, but maybe not
a third look ....
Frivolous lawsuits have become the bane of the
1st-world ... dragging it towards 2nd-world.
Oh ... why was there a 'guns' group in the OP ?
Planning to attack the delivery people ??? Plenty
of Wokie-Beloved thugs ahead of you there ...
Well, from now on you can trade a pig for a
sack or two of flour ....... kinda hard to
slip a pig into your wallet though.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)