• Re: Supreme Court, siding with Starbucks, makes it harder for pro-union

    From 26xh.0717@21:1/5 to Screwed on Sun Jun 16 23:33:15 2024
    XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.politics.republicans

    On 6/15/24 3:23 AM, Screwed wrote:
    WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Thursday made it harder for the federal government to win court orders when it suspects a company of interfering in unionization campaigns in a case that stemmed from a labor dispute with Starbucks.

    Normally I'd rather employers/labor work it out
    by themselves. Alas this has never been a smooth
    process even back into the 1920s - look up the
    union/Ford conflicts. Once organized crime and
    the commies got into it ......

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jun 17 11:36:05 2024
    XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.politics.republicans

    This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
    while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

    On Sun, 16 Jun 2024, 26xh.0717 wrote:

    On 6/15/24 3:23 AM, Screwed wrote:
    WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Thursday made it harder for the
    federal government to win court orders when it suspects a company of
    interfering in unionization campaigns in a case that stemmed from a labor
    dispute with Starbucks.

    Normally I'd rather employers/labor work it out
    by themselves. Alas this has never been a smooth
    process even back into the 1920s - look up the
    union/Ford conflicts. Once organized crime and
    the commies got into it ......

    Fun fact! Sweden does not have minimum wage laws, but instead employers
    and unions work it out themselves.

    Sadly, due to the socialist and authoritarian EU, this might soon be
    overruled by the EU socialists, so sweden might get minimum wage laws
    imposed on it.

    To be continued!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From 26xh.0717@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jun 17 21:46:33 2024
    XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.politics.republicans

    On 6/17/24 5:36 AM, D wrote:


    On Sun, 16 Jun 2024, 26xh.0717 wrote:

    On 6/15/24 3:23 AM, Screwed wrote:
    WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Thursday made it harder for the >>> federal government to win court orders when it suspects a company of
    interfering in unionization campaigns in a case that stemmed from a
    labor
    dispute with Starbucks.

     Normally I'd rather employers/labor work it out
     by themselves. Alas this has never been a smooth
     process even back into the 1920s - look up the
     union/Ford conflicts. Once organized crime and
     the commies got into it ......

    Fun fact! Sweden does not have minimum wage laws, but instead employers
    and unions work it out themselves.

    THEORETICALLY in the USA also ... but usually
    the unions can count on "help" from State and
    fellow travelers and organized crime. Result, the
    employers almost ALWAYS get screwed. Then prices
    go up or biz falls down and ...

    Sadly, due to the socialist and authoritarian EU, this might soon be overruled by the EU socialists, so sweden might get minimum wage laws
    imposed on it.

    To be continued!

    Indeed.

    The EU was originally intended to FACILITATE trade
    and international money issues. Naturally it suffered
    rapid 'scope creep' and began dictating to and
    micro-managing the peasants. Hell, they were trying
    to tell the Brits they couldn't have their "pint"
    anymore - sacrilege !

    Of interest, In the novel "1984" the proles were
    complaining that a half-liter was too little and
    a liter was too much. Ah, the perfect IngSoc life :-)

    IMHO, sometimes it is better to sacrifice a little
    "efficiency" rather than over-empower any large
    entity which promises such ......

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)