• "Blade Runner" - A Vision

    From c186282@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jul 27 01:22:37 2025
    XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.hollywood, alt.politics
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    I did buy "Do Androids Dream Of Electric Sheep" a VERY long
    time ago. Ridley Scott had an incredibly artistic and
    seriously dystopian vision of that.

    The main flaw was setting it so near in the future,
    2019. Interstellar colonies - likely not in 200
    years at best. The finest minds have been trying to
    sneak around Einie and lightspeed for 100 years with
    no success. Wormholes - forget it. "Warp drive" -
    needs lots of "negative energy" which probably
    does not exist. If there's a way around lightspeed
    it's gonna be some sleazy greasy quantum trick.
    Ask the UFO people - prob something to do with
    biasing "indeterminacy" ...

    The huma-bots ... looks like hardware AI is going to
    get "there" a lot sooner. The new slave class will
    be electronic, not biological. Much neater.

    Until it gets TOO smart ... then we're fucked.

    We WILL let it get too smart - for "convenience".
    What could go wrong eh ? Note the collapse of the
    recent AI Accords/Safety efforts ... "convenience"
    and power-thru-AI/bots WILL rule. Our nature.

    Had not seen "Blade Runner" for a LONG time ...
    but it suddenly came back into the play loop
    for TV networks. Good actors. Horribly depressing
    and distressing plot. Hate to say it, but it's
    probably a lot like what WOULD happen if the
    proposed huma-bots came to exist.

    Oh, for some reason, LA was shown as like 50%
    east Asian and it rained all the time like the
    old flix about London. "Climate change" was
    not a thing that far back, so WTF ?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gronk@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jul 27 23:24:56 2025
    XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.hollywood, alt.politics
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    c186282 wrote:
    I did buy "Do Androids Dream Of Electric Sheep" a VERY long

    Printed in 1968.

    time ago. Ridley Scott had an incredibly artistic and
    seriously dystopian vision of that.

    The main flaw was setting it so near in the future,
    2019. Interstellar colonies - likely not in 200

    Nor even the level of genetics on display. The movie
    came out in 1982. A window of almost*40* years.

    years at best. The finest minds have been trying to
    sneak around Einie and lightspeed for 100 years with
    no success. Wormholes - forget it. "Warp drive" -
    needs lots of "negative energy" which probably
    does not exist. If there's a way around lightspeed
    it's gonna be some sleazy greasy quantum trick.
    Ask the UFO people - prob something to do with
    biasing "indeterminacy" ...

    The huma-bots ... looks like hardware AI is going to

    They're not bots. They're genetic constructs. Hence
    the moral issues.

    get "there" a lot sooner. The new slave class will
    be electronic, not biological. Much neater.

    Until it gets TOO smart ... then we're fucked.

    We WILL let it get too smart - for "convenience".
    What could go wrong eh ? Note the collapse of the
    recent AI Accords/Safety efforts ... "convenience"
    and power-thru-AI/bots WILL rule. Our nature.

    Had not seen "Blade Runner" for a LONG time ...
    but it suddenly came back into the play loop
    for TV networks. Good actors. Horribly depressing
    and distressing plot. Hate to say it, but it's
    probably a lot like what WOULD happen if the
    proposed huma-bots came to exist.

    Oh, for some reason, LA was shown as like 50%
    east Asian and it rained all the time like the
    old flix about London. "Climate change" was
    not a thing that far back, so WTF ?

    Yes, it was. It's a theme in the movie. People
    were leaving earth because of it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)