• Israel’s leading paper says its own army deliberately killed Israelis o

    From NefeshBarYochai@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jul 10 23:25:42 2024
    XPost: uk.legal, alt.news-media, alt.politics.republicans
    XPost: soc.culture.british, alt.atheism

    Three days ago, Israel’s leading newspaper, Haaretz, published the
    results of its thorough, comprehensive investigation into what
    actually happened when Hamas attacked on October 7. So far, the U.S.
    mainstream media has not said a word about the shocking results of
    that investigation. Critics sometimes use the expression “media
    malpractice” to describe the American mainstream’s failure to report
    accurately about Israel/Palestine. This time, though, what’s happening
    is even worse; it has to be deliberate self-censorship, designed to
    hide the truth from the U.S. audience.

    Haaretz’s long report found that Israel’s army had employed the
    “Hannibal Directive” on October 7. The Directive is an Israeli policy
    that instructs the military to open fire on its own soldiers to
    prevent them from being taken captive. Of course, this site, alongside
    other alternative media sources, was one of the first to point out the
    possible role of the Hannibal Directive in Israeli deaths on October
    7. But the Haaretz report was significant in the number of military
    sources it interviewed who confirmed that there were direct orders to
    implement the Directive.

    Haaretz explained that the policy has “the intent of foiling
    kidnapping even at the expense of the lives of the kidnapped.” At
    first, the army started deploying “Ziks,” unmanned assault drones.
    Later, the army fired mortars, and then artillery shells. Haaretz also confirmed that the military did know that Israeli civilians had also
    been taken hostage, but, nonetheless, at 11:22 a.m. the order came
    down: “Not a single vehicle can return to Gaza.”

    The Haaretz report is cautious, but it still concludes: “[The 11:22
    a.m. message] was understood by everyone. . . At this point, the IDF
    was not aware of the extent of kidnapping along the Gaza border, but
    it did know that many people were involved. Thus, it was entirely
    clear what the message meant, and what the fate of some of the
    kidnapped people would be.”

    In other words, some — possibly many — of the Israeli deaths that
    day, including civilians, were deliberately caused by Israel’s own
    military. How this is not news is incomprehensible. But, three days
    later, in the New York Times: not a word. The Washington Post:
    nothing. CNN: nothing. National Public Radio: nada.

    Instead, if you plug “Hannibal” into the search engines at these media
    sites, the results only mention “Hannibal Lecter,” the fictional
    serial killer who was the subject of a book and popular film.

    But there’s nothing new about the Israeli military’s Hannibal
    Directive. (The doctrine is probably named for the Carthaginian
    general who fought Rome in 200 B.C., who said he would swallow poison
    instead of surrendering. Some Israeli sources claimed that the name
    was randomly generated, an assertion that prompts skepticism.)

    Way back on October 22, this site reported :

    “A growing number of reports indicate Israeli forces responsible for
    Israeli civilian and military deaths following October 7 attack.”

    Then, last March, the estimable Jonathan Ofir also posted here that an
    actual Israeli soldier, Captain Bar Zonshein, had admitted to “firing
    tank shells on vehicles carrying Israeli civilians.”

    The even more comprehensive Haaretz investigation should have prompted
    a reaction from the mainstream U.S. reporters who are stationed in
    Israel. American journalists should have been cultivating their own
    sources since October 7, and been ready to at least match the Haaretz
    article. Instead, the only response so far has been a panel hosted by
    Piers Morgan, and a Mehdi Hasan/Bassem Youssef podcast.

    I’ve followed the U.S. media coverage of Israel/Palestine closely for
    more than a decade now. Continuing to hide Israel’s deployment of the
    Hannibal Directive on October 7 is one of the most offensive examples
    of self-censorship that I can recall. The mainstream’s dishonesty is
    just one more example of why alternative websites are indispensable.

    https://mondoweiss.net/2024/07/israels-leading-paper-says-its-own-army-deliberately-killed-israelis-on-october-7-but-in-the-u-s-media-silence/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)