EMAIL (PARAPHASED) TO SENATOR JACQUI LAMBIE @ 1417 HRS ON 23 JUNE 2023: "UPDATE ON OUR LEGAL CASE TO THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT OUGHT TO
BE HEARD BEFORE YOURS SENATOR LAMBIE:
I just thought to share with you, only three documents as IBAC briefing
NOTES relating to the IRISH CATHOLIC REPUBLICANISM / KNIGHTS TEMPLAR
RENEWED IN 2015 hijacking the WORLD WAR I 2018 CENTENNIAL by their
ATLANTIS 25 APRIL 1915 PHANTASM against the COMMONWEALTH as the product
of a CEASAROPAPISM and deference given to PAPAL AUTHORITY. You would probably be aware that BEN ROBERTS-SMITH was on 6 APRIL 2010 pictured
wearing a KNIGHTS TEMPLAR CROSS (however this was obscured within a
photo released by Defence at some time near JANUARY 2011 which shows Mr ROBERTS-SMITH wearing a blank patch), but it is unknown to me whether
this was jewellery or an affiliation with their later RESURRECTION OF
CHRIST RENEWAL ON 2ND EASTER OF 11 APRIL 2015 as a calendar
correspondence to the crucifixion of 3 APRIL 33 AD.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/IBAC%20Notes%2020230417.pdf>
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/IBAC%20Notes%2020230613.pdf>
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/IBAC%20Notes%2020230620.pdf>
Herewith are details of the RUSSIANS similarly using a RELIGIOUS GAMBIT
(ie. the construction of the MAIN CATHEDRAL OF THE RUSSIAN ARMED FORCES: CATHEDRAL OF THE RESURRECTION OF CHRIST) as some considerations on
natural disconcertions [#38 - FULLNESS (SHENG), #33 - CLOSENESS (MI),
#40 - LAW / MODEL (FE)] by the RUSSIANs (REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM IDEA @328) HAVING A VALID CONCERN (ie. the #33 - PHONEMES induces a pathological characteristic within the TABLE TALK which includes JEWS, CHRISTIANS and COMMUNISTS in the same class as exclusion group) ABOUT NAZI IDENTITY
(ie. "rewrite history and glorify fascists" [Wikileaks document ID: 08MOSCOW2656_a, dated 1 FEBRUARY 2008]) which is BELLIGERENTLY an
unresolved question of 90 years duration and could [as prima facie]
subject NATO to reparations within the UKRAINIAN proxy war.
DATE OF INVASION 20 FEBRUARY 2022 + #485 *DAYS* = 24 JUNE 2023

<https://twitter.com/9NewsAUS/status/1672392358191828993>
9NEWS TWEET @ 0953 HOURS ON 24 JUNE 2023: "Russia is on the brink of a civil war - after the boss of private military company, as Wagner #238 /
#485 - *MOCKED* and vowed to punish the Kremlin for allegedly killing
his troops in a missile attack."
YOUTUBE: “HUNTERS AND COLLECTORS (HOLY GRAIL)”
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVsUVj0ENhY>
If you know nothing of the COMMONWEALTH being a product (ie. by letters patent from the hand of QUEEN VICTORIA as EMPRESS and DEFENDER OF THE
FAITH) of CAESAROPAPISM as a SUPERORDINATE TRIPARTITE NUMBER CONSTRUCT
to the machinery as BIPARTITE sovereign / autonomy dynamic as
differentiated worldviews, then you might not comprehend the underly HYPOSTASIS issues which can mitigate any culpability for alleged WAR
CRIMES.
Firstly the machinery (#65 - SOLDIER / #175 - WOMAN WITH CHILD) of STATE
as BIPARTITE worldview can lead to a disposition of NARCISSISTIC
PERSONALITY DISORDER which may result in a disregard of other persons
such as prisoners.
Secondly the BIPARTITE worldview can predispose one to adverse
behavioural reinforcement (eg: 20 year theatre of war with an ABSENCE OF
ANY VIABLE OBJECTIVE since they know nothing of the COMMONWEALTH being a product of CAESAROPAPISM as a SUPERORDINATE TRIPARTITE NUMBER CONSTRUCT
to the machinery as BIPARTITE sovereign / autonomy dynamic as different worldviews) as high acumen -/+ of DOMINION #n anchors resulting in
patterns [# ... # ... #] of behaviour responses which may not accord
with the #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY for viable action as evidence of prudent rather than instinctive action.
Lastly it is not known if there has been any investigation as to whether
such misconduct (eg: why was a NAZI flag flown; the CHRISTCHURCH
massacre was given as imprimatur by the RSL members associated with
KNIGHTS TEMPLAR RENEWED IN 2015 and there are 1.8 million AMERICAN
SOLDIERS as potential partners in crime) occurred in the advancement of
the SEDITIOUS CAUSE relating to the IRISH CATHOLIC REPUBLICANISM /
KNIGHTS TEMPLAR RENEWED IN 2015 hijacking the WORLD WAR I 2018
CENTENNIAL by their ATLANTIS 25 APRIL 1915 PHANTASM.
I'm just an ex-member of the police serve and a retired private citizen,
who watches TV and engages within informal research into metaphysical
and metempirical philosophy with the objective of technologizing QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT as a single avenue of enquiry pursued now for
some 27 years duration.
IF I MIGHT JUST THEN CONTINUE ON THREE THOUGHTS:
Should the misconduct (eg: why was a NAZI flag flown; the CHRISTCHURCH massacre was given imprimatur by the RSL members associated with KNIGHTS TEMPLAR RENEWED IN 2015 and there are 1.8 million AMERICAN SOLDIERS as potential associates) have occurred due to PROFESSIONAL COMPETITIVENESS
with AMERICAN SOLDIERS then IN AND OF ITSELF may be an undue adverse influence since their REPUBLIC is not a product of any CAESAROPAPISM but
an iconoclastic consequence against such (ie. "We hold these truths to
be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed
by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are
Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness") as insipid notions which
merely intersect the ANTHROPOLOGICAL SINGULARITY as IDEA TEMPLATE TO
QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT (as then EMPRESS and DEFENDER OF THE
FAITH).
Secondly the notion of ICONOCLASM against the TRIPARTITE WORLDVIEW of VOLUNTARY FREEWILL when it is subject to a PREDISPOSITION through
ADVERSE BEHAVIOURAL REINFORCEMENT BY METAKINESIS (ie. war) from a
BIPARTITE worldview such as ISLAM which has its own ANTHROPOLOGICAL
CONSTRUCT of SUBJECT WILL as claim to piety.
As a #468 - PERPLEXING QUESTION upon ICONOCLASM raised against the
BIPARTITE v's TRIPARTITE usage against this same #71 - DOMINION array construct, we've expanded the hypothetical consideration applicable to
GEORGE FLOYD's "I can't breath" death by continual exertion of force in
total dominion as an extremely high acumen -/+ of those #n anchors which
may be the result of adverse behavioural reinforcement as belligerence
(ie. not necessarily reciprocated) that spirals to its ultimate end as iconoclasm (ie.
Byzantine Greek εἰκονοκλάστης [TELOS: #984 (BY ISOPSEPHY) dolióō
(G1387): *DECEIT*, eidōleîon (G1493): *TEMPLE* *OF* *IDOLS*, echthrós (G2190): *HOSTILE*; *OPPOSING* *GOD* *IN* *THE* *MIND*; *DEMONIC* *AS* *BITTER* *ENEMY* *OF* *THE* *DIVINE* *GOVERNMENT*, syníēmi (G4920): *COMBATANTS*, MALE: #468 - PERPLEXING QUESTION, FEME: #417 - CAUSE OR
REASON, DEME: #155 - JUDGE OR UMPIRE] as etymology from εἰκών (eikṓn, “figure, icon, pattern, archetype”) + κλάω (kláō, “to break, weaken,
frustrate”) + -της (-tēs, agent suffix representing a state of being)
) against the #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY which is constitutionally intrinsic to the ontology of the human being (ie. homo sapiens)
reflecting IMAGO DEI.
#885 as [#5, #10, #20, #800, #50] = eikṓn (G1504): {UMBRA: #885 % #41 = #24} 1) an image, figure, likeness; 1a) *AN* *IMAGE* *OF* *THE* *THINGS* (*THE* *HEAVENLY* *THINGS*); 1a1) used of the moral likeness of renewed
men to God; 1a2) the image of the Son of God, into which true Christians
are transformed, is likeness not only to the heavenly body, but also to
the most holy and blessed state of mind, which Christ possesses; 1b) the image of one; 1b1) one in whom the likeness of any one is seen; 1b2) *APPLIED* *TO* *MAN* *ON* *ACCOUNT* *OF* *HIS* *POWER* *OF* *COMMAND*;
1b3) to Christ on account of his divine nature and absolute moral
excellence;
#257 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 23 JUNE 2023 as [#5, #20, #30, #1, #200, #1] /
#851 as [#20, #30, #1, #800] = kláō (G2806): {UMBRA: #851 % #41 = #31}
1) *TO* *BREAK*; 1a) used in the NT of the *BREAKING* *OF* *BREAD* *OR* *COMMUNION*;
#676 as [#80, #70, #10, #8, #300, #8, #200] = poiētḗs (G4163): {UMBRA: #676 % #41 = #20} 1) a maker, a producer, author; 2) a doer, performer;
2a) *ONE* *WHO* *OBEYS* *OR* *FULFILS* *THE* *LAW*; 3) a poet;
I'm not a lawyer and only possess a modicum of knowledge, but I think
that the relevant jurisprudent principle is CASUS DATAE LEGIS to
describe the circumstance of a BIPARTITE iconoclasm against the
TRIPARTITE premise of #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY as constitutionally intrinsic to the ontology of the human being which would then conform to IMMANUEL KANT'S representation of the unity of consciousness linking
together several other representations, or a representation of their
relation in a single concept (9: 101). In the Critique of Pure Reason
he characterizes judgment as [Pure general logic] deals with concepts, judgments, and inferences, corresponding exactly to the functions and
order of those powers of the mind, which are comprehended under the
broad designation of understanding in general… If the understanding in general is explained as the faculty of rules, then the power of judgment
is the faculty of subsuming under rules, i.e., of determining whether something stands under a given rule (CASUS DATAE LEGIS) or not. (A130-132/B170-172) <https://plato.stanford.edu/Archives/Win2004/entries/kant-judgment/>
WHILST WE HAVE DESIGNATED THE SEMANTICAL BASIS FOR A RATIONAL FACULTY OF RULES WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH THE ANTHROPOLOGICAL SINGULARITY as IDEA TEMPLATE TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT (then as EMPRESS and
DEFENDER OF THE FAITH). And UNDOUBTEDLY the relevant jurisprudent
principle of CASUS DATAE LEGIS is known [and conjectured upon but not
with any substantial clarity].
"Kant restricts the sense of 'Judgment" to the act of "subsuming under
rules, that is, of distinguishing whether something falls under a given
rule or not (CASUS DATAE LEGIS)" (id. A 132-34, B 171-74). This sense is borrowed from lawyerly usage, not from logic, for, as Kant shows, logic
has nothing to say regarding this operation. There are, and there can
be, no rules regarding the application of rules. If Kant is right, a
sizeable part of what we take to be "law," and almost all jurisprudence,
are nothing but a futile striving to overcome this essential unruliness
of judgment. How can it be that the saying of law is lawless?
Perhaps, however, even to lawyers, the essence of a judgment does not
lie in the application of a rule to a particular case, but rather in the statement, or restatement, of the rule to be applied (eg: #451 - PRAXIS
OF RATIONALITY OF WHICH THERE IS NO KNOWLEDGE). If law consists of
rules, and if rules themselves are general propositions stating
obligations in general terms, then the properly 'judicial" in a judgment would bet he stating of rules. The"case"would then matter only as
providing an occasion for such a ruling. If so, 'Judging," juridictio,
would find its most manifest instantiation in what we call
"legislation," legisatio, from legem tollere, the elevation of a lex, or statute, to its position of authority, which is always at once also the corresponding degradation of another.
Kant too, perhaps following this unmistakable hint of language, found a
kind of judgment in which the casus itself was manifestly decided,
indeed incontrovertibly, although the rule under which the fallen case
fell was still to be found, and would eventually deny itself entirely to man's power to say. To this type of judgment, he devoted the most heroic
of his works, which he called a critique of the power of judgment,
Kritik der Urteilskraft. There the will to judge seems to run up against
its outer limits. In what sense indeed is there still a 'Judgment," that
is, a saying of law, when the supposed "law" withdraws into
ineffability?" [Vanderbuilt Law Review, Volume 48, Issue 4 Issue 4 - May 1995]
To that end we've included the broader statement on an identified CHRISTOLOGICAL AND METASCHEMA OF EVASION WITH PARADIGM EQUIVALENCE TO
FASCIST IDENTITY (ie. the BIPARTITE @1 - SOVEREIGN AUTONOMY DYNAMIC / @5
- STATE AS ITS INVENTION), from which you can conclude that if ISLAM has
a CIRCUMSTANTIAL / SPECULATIVE CHRISTOLOGY THAT HAS NO CRUCIFIXION then
IPSO FACTO it is a METASCHEMA OF EVASION that is being deployed and detrimental to anything but its ANTHROPOLOGICAL idealism.
#68 #11 #44
#17 #41 #65
#38 #71 #14
The TRIPARTITE use of a temporal heuristic as metakosmeo which has an implicit conception of autonomy rather than a bipartite
HETEROS-AFFECTION (ie. I utilised this in relation to the #328 - TRANSFORMATION PROTOTYPE as its therapeutic imperative) stricture such
as the NUMI / NUMEN AUGUSTI [#38, #71, #14] metakinesis inducement as imposition [#17, #41, #65] made upon autonomy.
On that physiological basis the police member's presumption of guilt resulting in the elimination of GEORGE FLOYD is mitigated. Any implicit adverse institutional [#68, #11, #44] imperative which is self evident
since we stated it before the findings of those systemic prejudices were
made known, ought not be ipso facto imputed against the police officer's
#237 - USE OF FORCE as an AUTO-AFFECTIVE action.
Again, using the same #71 - DOMINION array construct, it ought to be
possible to resolve the #468: PERPLEXING QUESTION (#17) of prudent #519: discernment (#68) made in relation to the #495: seminal cause (#44) for
the exercising of #462: dominion (#11) corresponding to #465: limits
(#14) and the viability of #492: freewill (#41).
#123 as [#40, #1, #10, #2, #10, #20, #600] = ʼôyêb (H341): {UMBRA: #13 % #41 = #13} 1) (Qal) *ENEMY*; 1a) personal; 1b) national;
#516 (-> #65) - *METAKOSMEO* *ASSOCIATOR* as [#6, #8, #6, #90, #6, #400] / #519 (-> #68) as [#8, #6, #90, #400, #10, #5] /
#522 (-> #71) as [#2, #8, #6, #90, #400, #10, #6] = chûwts (H2351):
{UMBRA: #104 % #41 = #22} 1) *OUTSIDE*, outward, street, the outside;
As the need for an enquiry method to determine viability of the DOMINION array [] to assay the #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY for viable action. A high acumen -/+ of those #n anchors is evidence of prudent rather than instinctive action.
Whilst my usage of language is not as superlative, I AM (ie. I = #123 - JUDGEMENT SENSIBILITY / INTELLECT, AM = #82 - TERMS OF COMPLIANCE: @491
- PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY TO @1 - SELF) nevertheless able within a
TRIPARTITE paradigm as grounding for perspective to then accommodate by syncretic progression DERRIDA's obtuse semantical construct which is a BIPARTITE encapsulation of being as: "what he is trying to do with auto-affection: if the auto-position, the automonstrative autotely of
the ‘I,’ even in the human, implies the ‘I’ to be an other that must welcome within itself some irreducible hetero-affection."
Simply expressed as an ontic premise, if there are reciprocal I = #123 - judgement sensibility / intellect, then an obligating norm is implied as conformity to rule-based conventions:
#246 (ANTI-THESIS) - UTTERANCE; ACTIONS / #410 - OBLIGATING NORM (rule
based: BEAR NO FALSE WITNESS)
I did convey that a historical dependence upon the LUOSHU reference
object introduces an anthropological idealism associative to the META
LOGIC FALLACY within its #38 - *JUPITER* *PRINCIPLE* as aesthetic (ie.
the hypotenuse thesis) which is made against #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL
(#41 + #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY) being a methodology of #491 -
AGENCY that we redacted two policing #237 - USE OF FORCE scenarios (not included here) as CASE STUDIES to their metaphysical constructs relative
to the DOMINION ARRAY in the context of the COMMONWEALTH being a CAESAROPAPISM and DEFENDER [#44, #17, #38]@(#123 / #99 -- to deploy the DOMINION array anchors as a TRIPARTITE intellectual construct against
the ontic substitution premise within the machinery as BIPARTITE
sovereign / autonomy dynamic) OF THE FAITH: DIEU ET MON DROIT conforming
to a SUPERORDINATE TRIPARTITE NUMBER CONSTRUCT.
"THE JEWS ANSWERED HIM, WE HAVE A LAW, AND BY OUR LAW HE OUGHT TO DIE, BECAUSE HE MADE HIMSELF THE #415 - *SON* (ie. FOSTERING (yǎng): to
raise; to *BRING* *UP* (*CHILDREN*, animals); to give birth / #81 - 𝍖養
= #532 - shâbar (H7665): *BRING* *TO* *THE* *BIRTH*) OF GOD... AND WENT AGAIN INTO THE JUDGMENT [#1521 = praitṓrion (G4232): 'HEAD-QUARTERS' IN
A ROMAN CAMP; MAGNIFICENT PALACE OF HEROD (son of a hero) THE GREAT;
#341 - MAIN CATHEDRAL (TO THE RESURRECTION OF CHRIST) OF THE RUSSIAN
ARMED FORCES *CONSECRATION* ON 14 JUNE 2020 / #387 - *VICTORY* *DAY*
WHEN CONSTRUCTION OF THE CATHEDRAL WAS COMPLETED ON 9 MAY 2020] HALL ...
#509 - *YAHAD* (JEWISH / CHRISTIANS) / #516 - *METAKOSMEO* ASSOCIATOR =
3 APRIL 33 AD
#232 - *CUNNING* *PLAN* / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 20 JUNE 2023 as [#20, #100, #1, #60, #1, #50] /
#237 - *USE* *OF* *FORCE* / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 20 JUNE 2023 as [#5, #20, #100, #1, #60, #1, #50] = krázō (G2896): {UMBRA: #928 % #41 = #26} 1) to croak; 1a) of the *CRY* *OF* *A* *RAVEN*; 1b) hence, to cry
out, cry aloud, vociferate; 1c) *TO* *CRY* *OR* *PRAY* *FOR*
*VENGEANCE*; 2) to cry; 2a) *CRY* *OUT* *ALOUD*, speak with a loud voice;
BUT THE JEWS *CRIED*-G2896: OUT, SAYING IF THOU LET THIS MAN GO, THOU
ART NOT CAESAR'S FRIEND: WHOSOEVER MAKETH HIMSELF A KING SPEAKETH
AGAINST CAESAR." [John 19:7, 12]
It ought to be understood that #237 - USE OF FORCE is a conceptual form presently deployed by our state police whose motto is TENEZ LE DROIT /
UPHOLD THE RIGHT that is also an ontic / deme boundary and a general principle of #491 - AGENCY (ie. no less applicable to healthcare)
capacity in conformity to [... #40 - LAW / MODEL (FE)] as then a
functional #277 - RIGHT TO PLACE A TEST which is distinct to the #111 - FALLACIOUS OR VACUOUS assertion that attaining #71 - *DOMINION* [#38 - FULLNESS (SHENG), #33 - CLOSENESS (MI)] is judgement sensibility's
ultimate end as it's centre of value.
#71 as [#1, #30, #10, #30] /
#73 as [#6, #1, #30, #6, #30] /
#81 as [#1, #30, #10, #30, #10] /
#111 as [#1, #30, #10, #30, #600] /
#123 as [#2, #1, #30, #10, #30, #10, #600] = ʼĕlîyl (H457): {UMBRA: #71
% #41 = #30} 1) of nought, *GOOD* *FOR* *NOTHING*, worthless; 1a) *OF* *PHYSICIANS*, a shepherd, *A* *DIVINATION*; 1b) of false gods;
Which is also a requisite for GNOSIS EX MACHINA being a nomenclature provision of acceptable meta descriptors for articulating the viable
boundary (ie. SUGGESTED BY THE EXPRESSION nán táo fǎ wǎng (難逃法網): [#79 - 𝍔難 = #530 / #49 - 𝌶逃 = #500 / #40 - 𝌭法 = #491] - IT IS HARD TO
ESCAPE THE DRAGNET OF THE LAW; THE LONG ARM OF THE LAW) of consciousness instantiation, having a correspondence to the cosmological primitives
(ie. LAWS OF NATURE: fǎ dù (法度): [#40 - 𝌭法 = #491 / #52 - 𝌹度 =
#503] - (A) LAW / chéng wén fǎ (成文法): [#73 - 𝍎成 = #524 / #47 - 𝌴文
= #498 / #40 - 𝌭法 = #491] - STATUTE) published within the CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY (太玄經) TETRADS of 4 BCE.
It is UNLIKELY (in my humble opinion) that you'll find any COMPETENT
JUDGE let alone a PROSECUTOR who could make any determination of WAR
CRIMES in the circumstance of a BIPARTITE ICONOCLASM against the
TRIPARTITE premise of #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY.
Such a pity then that you would not be able to prosecute WAR CRIMES on
the basis of either NARCISSISTIC PERSONALITY DISORDER or a
PREDISPOSITION TO ADVERSE BEHAVIOURAL REINFORCEMENT BY METAKINESIS (ie.
war) as ICONOCLASM against FREEWILL from a BIPARTITE worldview such as
ISLAM which claims a piety established upon a metaphorical root (eg:
#232 - meteor idol secreted within the KAABA) and a demanded SUBJECT WILL.
However if misconduct occurred in the advancement of the SEDITIOUS CAUSE relating to the IRISH CATHOLIC REPUBLICANISM / KNIGHTS TEMPLAR RENEWED
IN 2015 I would prosecute.
Otherwise, I would propose the adoption of a #237 - USE OF FORCE / #277
- RIGHT TO PLACE A TEST methodology as an effective means for assaying
and negation by the introduction of an alternative postulate upon the thinking dynamic concept of #123 - INTELLECT and its relationship to
#164 - DOMINION as impetus for #205 - STRATEGIC ACTION.
Towards that end I have provided defence media with the ONTIC as
MATHEMATICAL IDEA TEMPLATE to QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT which as ANTHROPOLOGICAL SINGULARITY and ONTIC VARIANCE provides a CENTRAL means
for FACILITATORS / ARBITRATORS of FREEWILL.
Those philosophical contemplations which have taken some considerable
time to formulate into a comprehensive, substantial and persuasive jurisprudent argument was then the basis as to the nature of a
disclosure recorded within A FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST INTO THE
INCIDENT AT THE STAR HOTEL, 173 RAYMOND STREET, SALE @ 1130 TO 1245
HOURS ON SUNDAY 26 MARCH 2017:
"Have dealt with the male customer once prior, where ... [CENSORED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 33(1)] ... On this particular occasion, he
mentioned having been up since 2 AM working on ANTI-TERRORISM documents,
that he was a very important person to the county and had UNUSUAL
SKILLS, etc. All of which he revealed in a quick conversation before ordering."
Is it not as "ANTI-TERRORISM" action, by an "UNUSUAL SKILL" to exercise
faith in GOD with the intellectual and spontaneous capacity in writing a
POEM constituting a dialectic depth of fifteen lines including
consecutive WORDS OF THE DAY for 8 to 12 DECEMBER 2016;
www.dictionary.com and then weaponise it subsequently, with just a TITLE CHANGE on 6 MARCH 2022 as [#371, #392, #424, #492] for the occasion of
an important anniversary, as resonance to the RUSSIAN DAY OF REMEMBRANCE
AND SORROW (the day Germany invaded the Soviet Union in 1941) on 22 JUNE 2023?
TRIPLE F (#666) CAFE: “Why did you put this rubbish on our Triple F Cafe Facebook Page?”
<https://www.facebook.com/Triple-F-Cafe-freshfastfood-225837177482258>
DOLF: "Because that is what occupied my mind (ie. it is a demand of compliance which was made to 1.6 billion people) when I came into your
cafe this last morning CAROL (manly, strong)...
NOTE: The POEM was initially written as empathetic response to a
PERVERSE JUDGMENT on 9 DECEMBER 2016 by the DUTCH COURTS within CASE
NUMBER: 09/837304-15 against GEERT WILDER'S public speech on 19 MARCH 2014:
On 12 MARCH 2014 the Dutch politician GEERT WILDERS and several members
of his party, PVV, also known as The Freedom Party, visited a market in
The Hague. Part of their visit was broadcast on national TV and GEERT
WILDERS said that his party would make the city more safe, more
sociable, and if possible, make it a city with fewer Moroccans. When
later confronted with his statement WILDERS held that he had merely
referred to criminal Moroccans and Moroccans receiving benefits from the state.
On 19 MARCH 2014 the Freedom Party held an election rally at CAFÉ DE
TIJD in The Hague. During the meeting, GEERT WILDERS held a speech which
was recorded and broadcast on TV. In his speech he stated: “Before I go,
I would like everyone here to answer the following three questions.
Three questions, please give a clear answer which defines our party, the
PVV. Do you want more or less European Union?” The crowd present
EMAIL (PARAPHASED) TO SENATOR JACQUI LAMBIE @ 1417 HRS ON 23 JUNE 2023: "UPDATE ON OUR LEGAL CASE TO THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT OUGHT TO
BE HEARD BEFORE YOURS SENATOR LAMBIE:
I just thought to share with you, only three documents as IBAC briefing
NOTES relating to the IRISH CATHOLIC REPUBLICANISM / KNIGHTS TEMPLAR
RENEWED IN 2015 hijacking the WORLD WAR I 2018 CENTENNIAL by their
ATLANTIS 25 APRIL 1915 PHANTASM against the COMMONWEALTH as the product
of a CEASAROPAPISM and deference given to PAPAL AUTHORITY. You would probably be aware that BEN ROBERTS-SMITH was on 6 APRIL 2010 pictured
wearing a KNIGHTS TEMPLAR CROSS (however this was obscured within a
photo released by Defence at some time near JANUARY 2011 which shows Mr ROBERTS-SMITH wearing a blank patch), but it is unknown to me whether
this was jewellery or an affiliation with their later RESURRECTION OF
CHRIST RENEWAL ON 2ND EASTER OF 11 APRIL 2015 as a calendar
correspondence to the crucifixion of 3 APRIL 33 AD.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/IBAC%20Notes%2020230417.pdf>
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/IBAC%20Notes%2020230613.pdf>
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/IBAC%20Notes%2020230620.pdf>
Herewith are details of the RUSSIANS similarly using a RELIGIOUS GAMBIT
(ie. the construction of the MAIN CATHEDRAL OF THE RUSSIAN ARMED FORCES: CATHEDRAL OF THE RESURRECTION OF CHRIST) as some considerations on
natural disconcertions [#38 - FULLNESS (SHENG), #33 - CLOSENESS (MI),
#40 - LAW / MODEL (FE)] by the RUSSIANs (REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM IDEA @328) HAVING A VALID CONCERN (ie. the #33 - PHONEMES induces a pathological characteristic within the TABLE TALK which includes JEWS, CHRISTIANS and COMMUNISTS in the same class as exclusion group) ABOUT NAZI IDENTITY
(ie. "rewrite history and glorify fascists" [Wikileaks document ID: 08MOSCOW2656_a, dated 1 FEBRUARY 2008]) which is BELLIGERENTLY an
unresolved question of 90 years duration and could [as prima facie]
subject NATO to reparations within the UKRAINIAN proxy war.
DATE OF INVASION 20 FEBRUARY 2022 + #485 *DAYS* = 24 JUNE 2023

<https://twitter.com/9NewsAUS/status/1672392358191828993>
9NEWS TWEET @ 0953 HOURS ON 24 JUNE 2023: "Russia is on the brink of a civil war - after the boss of private military company, as Wagner #238 /
#485 - *MOCKED* and vowed to punish the Kremlin for allegedly killing
his troops in a missile attack."
YOUTUBE: “HUNTERS AND COLLECTORS (HOLY GRAIL)”
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVsUVj0ENhY>
If you know nothing of the COMMONWEALTH being a product (ie. by letters patent from the hand of QUEEN VICTORIA as EMPRESS and DEFENDER OF THE
FAITH) of CAESAROPAPISM as a SUPERORDINATE TRIPARTITE NUMBER CONSTRUCT
to the machinery as BIPARTITE sovereign / autonomy dynamic as
differentiated worldviews, then you might not comprehend the underly HYPOSTASIS issues which can mitigate any culpability for alleged WAR
CRIMES.
Firstly the machinery (#65 - SOLDIER / #175 - WOMAN WITH CHILD) of STATE
as BIPARTITE worldview can lead to a disposition of NARCISSISTIC
PERSONALITY DISORDER which may result in a disregard of other persons
such as prisoners.
Secondly the BIPARTITE worldview can predispose one to adverse
behavioural reinforcement (eg: 20 year theatre of war with an ABSENCE OF
ANY VIABLE OBJECTIVE since they know nothing of the COMMONWEALTH being a product of CAESAROPAPISM as a SUPERORDINATE TRIPARTITE NUMBER CONSTRUCT
to the machinery as BIPARTITE sovereign / autonomy dynamic as different worldviews) as high acumen -/+ of DOMINION #n anchors resulting in
patterns [# ... # ... #] of behaviour responses which may not accord
with the #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY for viable action as evidence of prudent rather than instinctive action.
Lastly it is not known if there has been any investigation as to whether
such misconduct (eg: why was a NAZI flag flown; the CHRISTCHURCH
massacre was given as imprimatur by the RSL members associated with
KNIGHTS TEMPLAR RENEWED IN 2015 and there are 1.8 million AMERICAN
SOLDIERS as potential partners in crime) occurred in the advancement of
the SEDITIOUS CAUSE relating to the IRISH CATHOLIC REPUBLICANISM /
KNIGHTS TEMPLAR RENEWED IN 2015 hijacking the WORLD WAR I 2018
CENTENNIAL by their ATLANTIS 25 APRIL 1915 PHANTASM.
I'm just an ex-member of the police serve and a retired private citizen,
who watches TV and engages within informal research into metaphysical
and metempirical philosophy with the objective of technologizing QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT as a single avenue of enquiry pursued now for
some 27 years duration.
IF I MIGHT JUST THEN CONTINUE ON THREE THOUGHTS:
Should the misconduct (eg: why was a NAZI flag flown; the CHRISTCHURCH massacre was given imprimatur by the RSL members associated with KNIGHTS TEMPLAR RENEWED IN 2015 and there are 1.8 million AMERICAN SOLDIERS as potential associates) have occurred due to PROFESSIONAL COMPETITIVENESS
with AMERICAN SOLDIERS then IN AND OF ITSELF may be an undue adverse influence since their REPUBLIC is not a product of any CAESAROPAPISM but
an iconoclastic consequence against such (ie. "We hold these truths to
be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed
by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are
Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness") as insipid notions which
merely intersect the ANTHROPOLOGICAL SINGULARITY as IDEA TEMPLATE TO
QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT (as then EMPRESS and DEFENDER OF THE
FAITH).
Secondly the notion of ICONOCLASM against the TRIPARTITE WORLDVIEW of VOLUNTARY FREEWILL when it is subject to a PREDISPOSITION through
ADVERSE BEHAVIOURAL REINFORCEMENT BY METAKINESIS (ie. war) from a
BIPARTITE worldview such as ISLAM which has its own ANTHROPOLOGICAL
CONSTRUCT of SUBJECT WILL as claim to piety.
As a #468 - PERPLEXING QUESTION upon ICONOCLASM raised against the
BIPARTITE v's TRIPARTITE usage against this same #71 - DOMINION array construct, we've expanded the hypothetical consideration applicable to
GEORGE FLOYD's "I can't breath" death by continual exertion of force in
total dominion as an extremely high acumen -/+ of those #n anchors which
may be the result of adverse behavioural reinforcement as belligerence
(ie. not necessarily reciprocated) that spirals to its ultimate end as iconoclasm (ie.
Byzantine Greek εἰκονοκλάστης [TELOS: #984 (BY ISOPSEPHY) dolióō
(G1387): *DECEIT*, eidōleîon (G1493): *TEMPLE* *OF* *IDOLS*, echthrós (G2190): *HOSTILE*; *OPPOSING* *GOD* *IN* *THE* *MIND*; *DEMONIC* *AS* *BITTER* *ENEMY* *OF* *THE* *DIVINE* *GOVERNMENT*, syníēmi (G4920): *COMBATANTS*, MALE: #468 - PERPLEXING QUESTION, FEME: #417 - CAUSE OR
REASON, DEME: #155 - JUDGE OR UMPIRE] as etymology from εἰκών (eikṓn, “figure, icon, pattern, archetype”) + κλάω (kláō, “to break, weaken,
frustrate”) + -της (-tēs, agent suffix representing a state of being)
) against the #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY which is constitutionally intrinsic to the ontology of the human being (ie. homo sapiens)
reflecting IMAGO DEI.
#885 as [#5, #10, #20, #800, #50] = eikṓn (G1504): {UMBRA: #885 % #41 = #24} 1) an image, figure, likeness; 1a) *AN* *IMAGE* *OF* *THE* *THINGS* (*THE* *HEAVENLY* *THINGS*); 1a1) used of the moral likeness of renewed
men to God; 1a2) the image of the Son of God, into which true Christians
are transformed, is likeness not only to the heavenly body, but also to
the most holy and blessed state of mind, which Christ possesses; 1b) the image of one; 1b1) one in whom the likeness of any one is seen; 1b2) *APPLIED* *TO* *MAN* *ON* *ACCOUNT* *OF* *HIS* *POWER* *OF* *COMMAND*;
1b3) to Christ on account of his divine nature and absolute moral
excellence;
#257 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 23 JUNE 2023 as [#5, #20, #30, #1, #200, #1] /
#851 as [#20, #30, #1, #800] = kláō (G2806): {UMBRA: #851 % #41 = #31}
1) *TO* *BREAK*; 1a) used in the NT of the *BREAKING* *OF* *BREAD* *OR* *COMMUNION*;
#676 as [#80, #70, #10, #8, #300, #8, #200] = poiētḗs (G4163): {UMBRA: #676 % #41 = #20} 1) a maker, a producer, author; 2) a doer, performer;
2a) *ONE* *WHO* *OBEYS* *OR* *FULFILS* *THE* *LAW*; 3) a poet;
I'm not a lawyer and only possess a modicum of knowledge, but I think
that the relevant jurisprudent principle is CASUS DATAE LEGIS to
describe the circumstance of a BIPARTITE iconoclasm against the
TRIPARTITE premise of #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY as constitutionally intrinsic to the ontology of the human being which would then conform to IMMANUEL KANT'S representation of the unity of consciousness linking
together several other representations, or a representation of their
relation in a single concept (9: 101). In the Critique of Pure Reason
he characterizes judgment as [Pure general logic] deals with concepts, judgments, and inferences, corresponding exactly to the functions and
order of those powers of the mind, which are comprehended under the
broad designation of understanding in general… If the understanding in general is explained as the faculty of rules, then the power of judgment
is the faculty of subsuming under rules, i.e., of determining whether something stands under a given rule (CASUS DATAE LEGIS) or not. (A130-132/B170-172) <https://plato.stanford.edu/Archives/Win2004/entries/kant-judgment/>
WHILST WE HAVE DESIGNATED THE SEMANTICAL BASIS FOR A RATIONAL FACULTY OF RULES WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH THE ANTHROPOLOGICAL SINGULARITY as IDEA TEMPLATE TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT (then as EMPRESS and
DEFENDER OF THE FAITH). And UNDOUBTEDLY the relevant jurisprudent
principle of CASUS DATAE LEGIS is known [and conjectured upon but not
with any substantial clarity].
"Kant restricts the sense of 'Judgment" to the act of "subsuming under
rules, that is, of distinguishing whether something falls under a given
rule or not (CASUS DATAE LEGIS)" (id. A 132-34, B 171-74). This sense is borrowed from lawyerly usage, not from logic, for, as Kant shows, logic
has nothing to say regarding this operation. There are, and there can
be, no rules regarding the application of rules. If Kant is right, a
sizeable part of what we take to be "law," and almost all jurisprudence,
are nothing but a futile striving to overcome this essential unruliness
of judgment. How can it be that the saying of law is lawless?
Perhaps, however, even to lawyers, the essence of a judgment does not
lie in the application of a rule to a particular case, but rather in the statement, or restatement, of the rule to be applied (eg: #451 - PRAXIS
OF RATIONALITY OF WHICH THERE IS NO KNOWLEDGE). If law consists of
rules, and if rules themselves are general propositions stating
obligations in general terms, then the properly 'judicial" in a judgment would bet he stating of rules. The"case"would then matter only as
providing an occasion for such a ruling. If so, 'Judging," juridictio,
would find its most manifest instantiation in what we call
"legislation," legisatio, from legem tollere, the elevation of a lex, or statute, to its position of authority, which is always at once also the corresponding degradation of another.
Kant too, perhaps following this unmistakable hint of language, found a
kind of judgment in which the casus itself was manifestly decided,
indeed incontrovertibly, although the rule under which the fallen case
fell was still to be found, and would eventually deny itself entirely to man's power to say. To this type of judgment, he devoted the most heroic
of his works, which he called a critique of the power of judgment,
Kritik der Urteilskraft. There the will to judge seems to run up against
its outer limits. In what sense indeed is there still a 'Judgment," that
is, a saying of law, when the supposed "law" withdraws into
ineffability?" [Vanderbuilt Law Review, Volume 48, Issue 4 Issue 4 - May 1995]
To that end we've included the broader statement on an identified CHRISTOLOGICAL AND METASCHEMA OF EVASION WITH PARADIGM EQUIVALENCE TO
FASCIST IDENTITY (ie. the BIPARTITE @1 - SOVEREIGN AUTONOMY DYNAMIC / @5
- STATE AS ITS INVENTION), from which you can conclude that if ISLAM has
a CIRCUMSTANTIAL / SPECULATIVE CHRISTOLOGY THAT HAS NO CRUCIFIXION then
IPSO FACTO it is a METASCHEMA OF EVASION that is being deployed and detrimental to anything but its ANTHROPOLOGICAL idealism.
#68 #11 #44
#17 #41 #65
#38 #71 #14
The TRIPARTITE use of a temporal heuristic as metakosmeo which has an implicit conception of autonomy rather than a bipartite
HETEROS-AFFECTION (ie. I utilised this in relation to the #328 - TRANSFORMATION PROTOTYPE as its therapeutic imperative) stricture such
as the NUMI / NUMEN AUGUSTI [#38, #71, #14] metakinesis inducement as imposition [#17, #41, #65] made upon autonomy.
On that physiological basis the police member's presumption of guilt resulting in the elimination of GEORGE FLOYD is mitigated. Any implicit adverse institutional [#68, #11, #44] imperative which is self evident
since we stated it before the findings of those systemic prejudices were
made known, ought not be ipso facto imputed against the police officer's
#237 - USE OF FORCE as an AUTO-AFFECTIVE action.
Again, using the same #71 - DOMINION array construct, it ought to be
possible to resolve the #468: PERPLEXING QUESTION (#17) of prudent #519: discernment (#68) made in relation to the #495: seminal cause (#44) for
the exercising of #462: dominion (#11) corresponding to #465: limits
(#14) and the viability of #492: freewill (#41).
#123 as [#40, #1, #10, #2, #10, #20, #600] = ʼôyêb (H341): {UMBRA: #13 % #41 = #13} 1) (Qal) *ENEMY*; 1a) personal; 1b) national;
#516 (-> #65) - *METAKOSMEO* *ASSOCIATOR* as [#6, #8, #6, #90, #6, #400] / #519 (-> #68) as [#8, #6, #90, #400, #10, #5] /
#522 (-> #71) as [#2, #8, #6, #90, #400, #10, #6] = chûwts (H2351):
{UMBRA: #104 % #41 = #22} 1) *OUTSIDE*, outward, street, the outside;
As the need for an enquiry method to determine viability of the DOMINION array [] to assay the #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY for viable action. A high acumen -/+ of those #n anchors is evidence of prudent rather than instinctive action.
Whilst my usage of language is not as superlative, I AM (ie. I = #123 - JUDGEMENT SENSIBILITY / INTELLECT, AM = #82 - TERMS OF COMPLIANCE: @491
- PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY TO @1 - SELF) nevertheless able within a
TRIPARTITE paradigm as grounding for perspective to then accommodate by syncretic progression DERRIDA's obtuse semantical construct which is a BIPARTITE encapsulation of being as: "what he is trying to do with auto-affection: if the auto-position, the automonstrative autotely of
the ‘I,’ even in the human, implies the ‘I’ to be an other that must welcome within itself some irreducible hetero-affection."
Simply expressed as an ontic premise, if there are reciprocal I = #123 - judgement sensibility / intellect, then an obligating norm is implied as conformity to rule-based conventions:
#246 (ANTI-THESIS) - UTTERANCE; ACTIONS / #410 - OBLIGATING NORM (rule
based: BEAR NO FALSE WITNESS)
I did convey that a historical dependence upon the LUOSHU reference
object introduces an anthropological idealism associative to the META
LOGIC FALLACY within its #38 - *JUPITER* *PRINCIPLE* as aesthetic (ie.
the hypotenuse thesis) which is made against #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL
(#41 + #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY) being a methodology of #491 -
AGENCY that we redacted two policing #237 - USE OF FORCE scenarios (not included here) as CASE STUDIES to their metaphysical constructs relative
to the DOMINION ARRAY in the context of the COMMONWEALTH being a CAESAROPAPISM and DEFENDER [#44, #17, #38]@(#123 / #99 -- to deploy the DOMINION array anchors as a TRIPARTITE intellectual construct against
the ontic substitution premise within the machinery as BIPARTITE
sovereign / autonomy dynamic) OF THE FAITH: DIEU ET MON DROIT conforming
to a SUPERORDINATE TRIPARTITE NUMBER CONSTRUCT.
"THE JEWS ANSWERED HIM, WE HAVE A LAW, AND BY OUR LAW HE OUGHT TO DIE, BECAUSE HE MADE HIMSELF THE #415 - *SON* (ie. FOSTERING (yǎng): to
raise; to *BRING* *UP* (*CHILDREN*, animals); to give birth / #81 - 𝍖養
= #532 - shâbar (H7665): *BRING* *TO* *THE* *BIRTH*) OF GOD... AND WENT AGAIN INTO THE JUDGMENT [#1521 = praitṓrion (G4232): 'HEAD-QUARTERS' IN
A ROMAN CAMP; MAGNIFICENT PALACE OF HEROD (son of a hero) THE GREAT;
#341 - MAIN CATHEDRAL (TO THE RESURRECTION OF CHRIST) OF THE RUSSIAN
ARMED FORCES *CONSECRATION* ON 14 JUNE 2020 / #387 - *VICTORY* *DAY*
WHEN CONSTRUCTION OF THE CATHEDRAL WAS COMPLETED ON 9 MAY 2020] HALL ...
#509 - *YAHAD* (JEWISH / CHRISTIANS) / #516 - *METAKOSMEO* ASSOCIATOR =
3 APRIL 33 AD
#232 - *CUNNING* *PLAN* / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 20 JUNE 2023 as [#20, #100, #1, #60, #1, #50] /
#237 - *USE* *OF* *FORCE* / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 20 JUNE 2023 as [#5, #20, #100, #1, #60, #1, #50] = krázō (G2896): {UMBRA: #928 % #41 = #26} 1) to croak; 1a) of the *CRY* *OF* *A* *RAVEN*; 1b) hence, to cry
out, cry aloud, vociferate; 1c) *TO* *CRY* *OR* *PRAY* *FOR*
*VENGEANCE*; 2) to cry; 2a) *CRY* *OUT* *ALOUD*, speak with a loud voice;
BUT THE JEWS *CRIED*-G2896: OUT, SAYING IF THOU LET THIS MAN GO, THOU
ART NOT CAESAR'S FRIEND: WHOSOEVER MAKETH HIMSELF A KING SPEAKETH
AGAINST CAESAR." [John 19:7, 12]
It ought to be understood that #237 - USE OF FORCE is a conceptual form presently deployed by our state police whose motto is TENEZ LE DROIT /
UPHOLD THE RIGHT that is also an ontic / deme boundary and a general principle of #491 - AGENCY (ie. no less applicable to healthcare)
capacity in conformity to [... #40 - LAW / MODEL (FE)] as then a
functional #277 - RIGHT TO PLACE A TEST which is distinct to the #111 - FALLACIOUS OR VACUOUS assertion that attaining #71 - *DOMINION* [#38 - FULLNESS (SHENG), #33 - CLOSENESS (MI)] is judgement sensibility's
ultimate end as it's centre of value.
#71 as [#1, #30, #10, #30] /
#73 as [#6, #1, #30, #6, #30] /
#81 as [#1, #30, #10, #30, #10] /
#111 as [#1, #30, #10, #30, #600] /
#123 as [#2, #1, #30, #10, #30, #10, #600] = ʼĕlîyl (H457): {UMBRA: #71
% #41 = #30} 1) of nought, *GOOD* *FOR* *NOTHING*, worthless; 1a) *OF* *PHYSICIANS*, a shepherd, *A* *DIVINATION*; 1b) of false gods;
Which is also a requisite for GNOSIS EX MACHINA being a nomenclature provision of acceptable meta descriptors for articulating the viable
boundary (ie. SUGGESTED BY THE EXPRESSION nán táo fǎ wǎng (難逃法網): [#79 - 𝍔難 = #530 / #49 - 𝌶逃 = #500 / #40 - 𝌭法 = #491] - IT IS HARD TO
ESCAPE THE DRAGNET OF THE LAW; THE LONG ARM OF THE LAW) of consciousness instantiation, having a correspondence to the cosmological primitives
(ie. LAWS OF NATURE: fǎ dù (法度): [#40 - 𝌭法 = #491 / #52 - 𝌹度 =
#503] - (A) LAW / chéng wén fǎ (成文法): [#73 - 𝍎成 = #524 / #47 - 𝌴文
= #498 / #40 - 𝌭法 = #491] - STATUTE) published within the CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY (太玄經) TETRADS of 4 BCE.
It is UNLIKELY (in my humble opinion) that you'll find any COMPETENT
JUDGE let alone a PROSECUTOR who could make any determination of WAR
CRIMES in the circumstance of a BIPARTITE ICONOCLASM against the
TRIPARTITE premise of #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY.
Such a pity then that you would not be able to prosecute WAR CRIMES on
the basis of either NARCISSISTIC PERSONALITY DISORDER or a
PREDISPOSITION TO ADVERSE BEHAVIOURAL REINFORCEMENT BY METAKINESIS (ie.
war) as ICONOCLASM against FREEWILL from a BIPARTITE worldview such as
ISLAM which claims a piety established upon a metaphorical root (eg:
#232 - meteor idol secreted within the KAABA) and a demanded SUBJECT WILL.
However if misconduct occurred in the advancement of the SEDITIOUS CAUSE relating to the IRISH CATHOLIC REPUBLICANISM / KNIGHTS TEMPLAR RENEWED
IN 2015 I would prosecute.
Otherwise, I would propose the adoption of a #237 - USE OF FORCE / #277
- RIGHT TO PLACE A TEST methodology as an effective means for assaying
and negation by the introduction of an alternative postulate upon the thinking dynamic concept of #123 - INTELLECT and its relationship to
#164 - DOMINION as impetus for #205 - STRATEGIC ACTION.
Towards that end I have provided defence media with the ONTIC as
MATHEMATICAL IDEA TEMPLATE to QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT which as ANTHROPOLOGICAL SINGULARITY and ONTIC VARIANCE provides a CENTRAL means
for FACILITATORS / ARBITRATORS of FREEWILL.
Those philosophical contemplations which have taken some considerable
time to formulate into a comprehensive, substantial and persuasive jurisprudent argument was then the basis as to the nature of a
disclosure recorded within A FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST INTO THE
INCIDENT AT THE STAR HOTEL, 173 RAYMOND STREET, SALE @ 1130 TO 1245
HOURS ON SUNDAY 26 MARCH 2017:
"Have dealt with the male customer once prior, where ... [CENSORED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 33(1)] ... On this particular occasion, he
mentioned having been up since 2 AM working on ANTI-TERRORISM documents,
that he was a very important person to the county and had UNUSUAL
SKILLS, etc. All of which he revealed in a quick conversation before ordering."
Is it not as "ANTI-TERRORISM" action, by an "UNUSUAL SKILL" to exercise
faith in GOD with the intellectual and spontaneous capacity in writing a
POEM constituting a dialectic depth of fifteen lines including
consecutive WORDS OF THE DAY for 8 to 12 DECEMBER 2016;
www.dictionary.com and then weaponise it subsequently, with just a TITLE CHANGE on 6 MARCH 2022 as [#371, #392, #424, #492] for the occasion of
an important anniversary, as resonance to the RUSSIAN DAY OF REMEMBRANCE
AND SORROW (the day Germany invaded the Soviet Union in 1941) on 22 JUNE 2023?
TRIPLE F (#666) CAFE: “Why did you put this rubbish on our Triple F Cafe Facebook Page?”
<https://www.facebook.com/Triple-F-Cafe-freshfastfood-225837177482258>
DOLF: "Because that is what occupied my mind (ie. it is a demand of compliance which was made to 1.6 billion people) when I came into your
cafe this last morning CAROL (manly, strong)...
NOTE: The POEM was initially written as empathetic response to a
PERVERSE JUDGMENT on 9 DECEMBER 2016 by the DUTCH COURTS within CASE
NUMBER: 09/837304-15 against GEERT WILDER'S public speech on 19 MARCH 2014:
On 12 MARCH 2014 the Dutch politician GEERT WILDERS and several members
of his party, PVV, also known as The Freedom Party, visited a market in
The Hague. Part of their visit was broadcast on national TV and GEERT
WILDERS said that his party would make the city more safe, more
sociable, and if possible, make it a city with fewer Moroccans. When
later confronted with his statement WILDERS held that he had merely
referred to criminal Moroccans and Moroccans receiving benefits from the state.
On 19 MARCH 2014 the Freedom Party held an election rally at CAFÉ DE
TIJD in The Hague. During the meeting, GEERT WILDERS held a speech which
was recorded and broadcast on TV. In his speech he stated: “Before I go,
I would like everyone here to answer the following three questions.
Three questions, please give a clear answer which defines our party, the
PVV. Do you want more or less European Union?” The crowd present
repeatedly shouted “less”. WILDERS then went on to pose the second question: “Do you want more or less Labour Party?” The crowd again shouted “less”. WILDERS continued: “And the third question is, and actually I’m not allowed to say it, because you get reported to the
police, and maybe there are even D66 prosecutors who will launch a case,
but freedom of expression is a great good and we haven’t said anything
that isn’t allowed, we haven’t said anything that’s incorrect, so I ask you: do you want more or fewer Moroccans in this city and in the Netherlands?”. The crowd repeatedly shouted “less”. GEERT WILDERS then concluded his speech with the words: “Nah, we’ll arrange it”.
At the election meeting a coordinator (witness 3) from the PVV had been
aware that WILDERS would ask the public whether they wanted fewer
Moroccans. The coordinator had been asked (by witness 4) to instruct the public in advance of the question and answer. Before the speech witness
We provide herewith a document associated to our TRIPARTITE NUMBER theoretical NOUMENON / GODHEAD as my sole INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY relevant
to GNOSIS EX MACHINA as a nomenclature for consciousness instantiation
and the neuraxis (ie. From Ancient Greek νεῦρον (neûron) [TELOS: #675 -
*CAPABLE*; MALE: #309; FEME: #270; ONTIC: #370, DEME: #525] + άξονας (áxonas) [TELOS: #382 - *BIND*, MALE: #209; FEME: #220, ONTIC: #583,
DEME: #544] as an axis that forms part of the interchange basis of situational grounding for action) possibility for obtaining exclusive
PATENTS to intelligent books and knowledge spheres as requisite for a knowledge / sapient economy: "DEVISING THE IDEA TEMPLATE TO QUEEN
VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT AND HYPOTHESIS ON ONTIC VARIANCE BY
TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION WITHOUT IDEOLOGICAL OR PARTISAN IMPETUS"
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Letters%20Patent%20Variance.pdf>
ON THAT BASIS CAROL @ TRIPLE F (#666) CAFE's APPLICATION AND SUMMONS FOR
AN INTERVENTION ORDER in CASE NUMBER: G13559325 dated 30 DECEMBER 2016
OUGHT TO HAVE NO LOCUS STANDI WITHIN ANY COURT AS JURISDICTION WITHIN
THE COMMONWEALTH SINCE IT IS AN ICONOCLASM AGAINST FIRST PRINCIPLES
being the #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY which as metakosemeo is constitutionally the product of a CAESAROPAPISM intrinsic to QUEEN
VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT and the ontology of the human being (ie. homosapiens) reflecting IMAGO DEI.
I believe the MAGISTRATE was of an IRISH DECENT and by NATURE would be advancing an IRISH REPUBLICAN ACTIVIST / WORLD WAR ONE 2018 HIJACKING SEDITIOUS / TREASONOUS CAUSE in their determinations and therefore ought
to have RECUSED THEMSELVES within the APPLICATION AND SUMMONS FOR AN INTERVENTION ORDER in CASE NUMBER: G13559325 dated 30 DECEMBER 2016 and
in hearings matters subsequent as especially CASE NUMBER: H12143475
lodged on 31 JULY 2017 which included the following item as grounds:
#3: ON 31.7.2017 AT 10AM [THE RESPONDENT] SHOWED ME A PHOTOGRAPH OF THE MARION STATUE WITH[IN] THE PARK OPPOSITE WEARING A BALACLAVA AS TO
CONVEY OUR MUTUAL UNDERSTAND[ING] OF IT['S] PLACEMENT AS *AN* *ATTEMPT* [*TO*] *SUBVERT* *OUR* *AUSTRALIAN* *HISTORY* *WHICH* *IS* *ABSENT* *OF* *ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *IMPOSITIONS* *UPON* *OUR* *BOER* / *ANZAC*
*TRADITION* *BY* *A* *SUBSTITUTED* *ETHIC*.
THERE WAS NOT SUFFICIENT GROUNDS WITHIN AN INTERVENTION ORDERS AS CASE
NUMBER H13214018 DATED 22 NOVEMBER 2017 WHICH ARE ALL SUBSEQUENT TO MY APPLICATION FOR ORDERS MADE OF 31 JULY 2017 AND CLEARLY DESIGNED TO
FRUSTRATE THEM FOR THE MAGISTRATE of an IRISH DECENT TO THEN ENJOIN THEM
#1 - I have known the RESPONDENT for approximately 2 years and 3 months,
the RESPONDENT is my neighbour, we live in an apartment block / set of
units.
#2 - The most recent incident occurred on 22 NOVEMBER 2017 I was at No
#n speaking with the resident when the RESPONDENT pulled into the
driveway blocking the exit and started photographing me and filming me.
[No it was the phallic graffiti which the APPLICANT had left within my parking space that I had tried to photograph (ie. functionally difficult
to do with a new model which required new gestures given the absence of
a home button) and remove before parking on private property -- no photographs were even taken but a voice recording was instead obtained
which the MAGISTRATE as habitually perverse justice failed to consider]
#3 - I approached him and told him to move his car and stop taking
pictures of me.
#4 - The RESPONDENT ignored me and continued to take photos.
#5 - Previously the RESPONDENT has harassed all of my family and friends
that visit me and are subject to racial taunts, their pictures being
taken and threatened to be published on the internet, and accuses them
of being NAZI sympathisers.
#6 - I believe the respondent will continue with this behaviour.
We have to see whether the Knights Templar jewellery BEN ROBERTS SMITH
wore on 6 APRIL 2010 was a treasonous affinity with a CHRIST OF THE RESURRECTION renewal on 11 April 2015. Since the Russians used the same
META SCHEMA gambit with Ukraine.
The IBAC Notes dated 20 JUNE 2023 poses the question: WAS CONSTRUCTION
OF THE RUSSIAN ARMED FORCES MAIN (RESURRECTION OF CHRIST) CATHEDRAL A
META SCHEMA FOR DISASSOCIATION WITH NAZISM'S PARADIGMATIC SOCIALIST MANIFESTO?
#2312 [#523 - milchâmâh (H4421): *BATTLE*, *WAR* (22 JUNE RESONANCE) /
#368 - shêm (H8034): *MEMORIAL*, *MONUMENT* (22 JUNE RESONANCE)] /
#1943 [#753 - sâmach (H8055): *TO* *REJOICE* *RELIGIOUSLY* (22 JUNE RESONANCE) / #485 - oikodomḗ (G3619): *THE* *ACT* *OF* *BUILDING*] = metaschēmatízō (G3345): {UMBRA: #2312 % #41 = #16} 1) *TO* *CHANGE*
*THE* *FIGURE* *OF*, *TO* *TRANSFORM* made in conjunction with the
VATICAN CITY-STATE (#291, #297, #333) to absolve themselves of any paradigmatic association given the Nazism socialist faith which is unequivocally expressed by the IDEA @328 as pathological characteristic within the TABLE TALK as its manifesto.
By the ingenuity of our publicly accessible IBAC Notes dated 20 JUNE
2023 within our own LEGAL MATTERS we had effected an appropriate
intervention by the happenstance in rendering a #451 - PRAXIS OF
RATIONALITY mediation assistance to the Russians 🇷🇺 and their conflict with fascist identity (ie. #33 association with REICH CONCORDAT of 20
JULY 1933) and bipartite paradigm as an intervention although devised 7
years ago then intersecting #33 ---> #484 day of conflict on 23 JUNE
2023 and transitioning them to a tripartite number / neural linguistic foundation we have thereby differentiated them from IRISH CATHOLIC REPUBLICANISM / KNIGHTS TEMPLAR RENEWED IN 2015 deploying the same
METASCHEMA OF EVASION as now a CASE STUDY of substantiation within any
PRIMA FACIE MODUS OPERANDI CLAIM of TREASON:
"*TRANSFORMING*-G3345 THEMSELVES INTO THE APOSTLES OF #1480 [#329 -
éthnos (G1484): *TROOP*, *NATION*, *SAME* *NATURE* *OR* *GENUS* / #265 - apología (G627): *REASONED* *STATEMENT* *OR* *ARGUMENT*] / #2020 [#384 - sálpinx (G4536): *TRUMPET* / #238 - zâkar (H2142): *MAKE* *A*
*MEMORIAL*, *KEEP* *IN* *REMEMBRANCE*] - *CHRIST*.
AND NO MARVEL; FOR *SATAN*-G4567 HIMSELF IS *TRANSFORMED*-G3345 INTO AN
ANGEL OF LIGHT." [2Corinthians 11:12-14]
PAPAL BULL *MISERICORDIAE* *VULTUS* for INDICTION OF THE EXTRAORDINARY JUBILEE OF MERCY (ANNOUNCED: #449 - 13 MARCH 2015 / DECLARED: 2ND EASTER SUNDAY ON 11 APRIL 2015) occurring from #355 - 8 DECEMBER 2015 (Feast of
the Immaculate Conception) to #355 - 20 NOVEMBER 2016
Our intent is to pursue a legal claim of SLANDER by VEXATIOUS and non-justiciable legal process which are made as an ICONOCLASM AGAINST
THE FIRST PRINCIPLES OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT of which the MAGISTRATE of an IRISH DECENT was made aware that constituted TREASON
and which we alleged was the modus operandi by the judiciary in their habitually perversely using our LEGAL MATTERS as an economy to then
advance IRISH CATHOLIC REPUBLICANISM / KNIGHTS TEMPLAR RENEWED IN 2015
with the intention of a METASCHEMA OF EVASION to hijack the WORLD WAR I
2018 CENTENNIAL by their ATLANTIS 25 APRIL 1915 PHANTASM against the COMMONWEALTH as the product of a CAESAROPAPISM and deference given to
PAPAL AUTHORITY occasioning PUBLIC EXCORIATION promulgating RACIAL AND RELIGIOUS HATRED against CAROL @ TRIPLE F (#666) CAFE as encouragement
for them to:
“Go back to where you came from."
If the colonial military penalty given to BREAKER MORANT was good enough then, it ought to be good enough for this MAGISTRATE of an IRISH DECENT.
ALSO PURSUE THE VICTORIA POLICE and STATE OF VICTORIA FOR PERSECUTION in being implicitly a FASCIST (ie. neither the police or the Chief Justice
have recanted such association which was manifestly evident in 1934) VIOLATION of the FIRST PRINCIPLES which are constitutionally intrinsic
to QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT.
You are going to be taught a lesson in TOTALITARIANISM and it's
PERSECUTION before the CENTENNIAL OF WORLD WAR TWO.
On 24/6/2023 12:43, dolf wrote:
EMAIL (PARAPHASED) TO SENATOR JACQUI LAMBIE @ 1417 HRS ON 23 JUNE
2023: "UPDATE ON OUR LEGAL CASE TO THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT
OUGHT TO BE HEARD BEFORE YOURS SENATOR LAMBIE:
I just thought to share with you, only three documents as IBAC
briefing NOTES relating to the IRISH CATHOLIC REPUBLICANISM / KNIGHTS
TEMPLAR RENEWED IN 2015 hijacking the WORLD WAR I 2018 CENTENNIAL by
their ATLANTIS 25 APRIL 1915 PHANTASM against the COMMONWEALTH as the
product of a CEASAROPAPISM and deference given to PAPAL AUTHORITY.
You would probably be aware that BEN ROBERTS-SMITH was on 6 APRIL 2010
pictured wearing a KNIGHTS TEMPLAR CROSS (however this was obscured
within a photo released by Defence at some time near JANUARY 2011
which shows Mr ROBERTS-SMITH wearing a blank patch), but it is unknown
to me whether this was jewellery or an affiliation with their later
RESURRECTION OF CHRIST RENEWAL ON 2ND EASTER OF 11 APRIL 2015 as a
calendar correspondence to the crucifixion of 3 APRIL 33 AD.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/IBAC%20Notes%2020230417.pdf>
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/IBAC%20Notes%2020230613.pdf>
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/IBAC%20Notes%2020230620.pdf>
Herewith are details of the RUSSIANS similarly using a RELIGIOUS
GAMBIT (ie. the construction of the MAIN CATHEDRAL OF THE RUSSIAN
ARMED FORCES: CATHEDRAL OF THE RESURRECTION OF CHRIST) as some
considerations on natural disconcertions [#38 - FULLNESS (SHENG), #33
- CLOSENESS (MI), #40 - LAW / MODEL (FE)] by the RUSSIANs (REDUCTIO AD
HITLERUM IDEA @328) HAVING A VALID CONCERN (ie. the #33 - PHONEMES
induces a pathological characteristic within the TABLE TALK which
includes JEWS, CHRISTIANS and COMMUNISTS in the same class as
exclusion group) ABOUT NAZI IDENTITY (ie. "rewrite history and glorify
fascists" [Wikileaks document ID: 08MOSCOW2656_a, dated 1 FEBRUARY
2008]) which is BELLIGERENTLY an unresolved question of 90 years
duration and could [as prima facie] subject NATO to reparations within
the UKRAINIAN proxy war.
DATE OF INVASION 20 FEBRUARY 2022 + #485 *DAYS* = 24 JUNE 2023

<https://twitter.com/9NewsAUS/status/1672392358191828993>
9NEWS TWEET @ 0953 HOURS ON 24 JUNE 2023: "Russia is on the brink of
a civil war - after the boss of private military company, as Wagner
#238 / #485 - *MOCKED* and vowed to punish the Kremlin for allegedly
killing his troops in a missile attack."
YOUTUBE: “HUNTERS AND COLLECTORS (HOLY GRAIL)”
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVsUVj0ENhY>
If you know nothing of the COMMONWEALTH being a product (ie. by
letters patent from the hand of QUEEN VICTORIA as EMPRESS and DEFENDER
OF THE FAITH) of CAESAROPAPISM as a SUPERORDINATE TRIPARTITE NUMBER
CONSTRUCT to the machinery as BIPARTITE sovereign / autonomy dynamic
as differentiated worldviews, then you might not comprehend the
underly HYPOSTASIS issues which can mitigate any culpability for
alleged WAR CRIMES.
Firstly the machinery (#65 - SOLDIER / #175 - WOMAN WITH CHILD) of
STATE as BIPARTITE worldview can lead to a disposition of NARCISSISTIC
PERSONALITY DISORDER which may result in a disregard of other persons
such as prisoners.
Secondly the BIPARTITE worldview can predispose one to adverse
behavioural reinforcement (eg: 20 year theatre of war with an ABSENCE
OF ANY VIABLE OBJECTIVE since they know nothing of the COMMONWEALTH
being a product of CAESAROPAPISM as a SUPERORDINATE TRIPARTITE NUMBER
CONSTRUCT to the machinery as BIPARTITE sovereign / autonomy dynamic
as different worldviews) as high acumen -/+ of DOMINION #n anchors
resulting in patterns [# ... # ... #] of behaviour responses which may
not accord with the #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY for viable action as
evidence of prudent rather than instinctive action.
Lastly it is not known if there has been any investigation as to
whether such misconduct (eg: why was a NAZI flag flown; the
CHRISTCHURCH massacre was given as imprimatur by the RSL members
associated with KNIGHTS TEMPLAR RENEWED IN 2015 and there are 1.8
million AMERICAN SOLDIERS as potential partners in crime) occurred in
the advancement of the SEDITIOUS CAUSE relating to the IRISH CATHOLIC
REPUBLICANISM / KNIGHTS TEMPLAR RENEWED IN 2015 hijacking the WORLD
WAR I 2018 CENTENNIAL by their ATLANTIS 25 APRIL 1915 PHANTASM.
I'm just an ex-member of the police serve and a retired private
citizen, who watches TV and engages within informal research into
metaphysical and metempirical philosophy with the objective of
technologizing QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT as a single avenue of
enquiry pursued now for some 27 years duration.
IF I MIGHT JUST THEN CONTINUE ON THREE THOUGHTS:
Should the misconduct (eg: why was a NAZI flag flown; the CHRISTCHURCH
massacre was given imprimatur by the RSL members associated with
KNIGHTS TEMPLAR RENEWED IN 2015 and there are 1.8 million AMERICAN
SOLDIERS as potential associates) have occurred due to PROFESSIONAL
COMPETITIVENESS with AMERICAN SOLDIERS then IN AND OF ITSELF may be an
undue adverse influence since their REPUBLIC is not a product of any
CAESAROPAPISM but an iconoclastic consequence against such (ie. "We
hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,
that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable
Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of
Happiness") as insipid notions which merely intersect the
ANTHROPOLOGICAL SINGULARITY as IDEA TEMPLATE TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT (as then EMPRESS and DEFENDER OF THE FAITH).
Secondly the notion of ICONOCLASM against the TRIPARTITE WORLDVIEW of
VOLUNTARY FREEWILL when it is subject to a PREDISPOSITION through
ADVERSE BEHAVIOURAL REINFORCEMENT BY METAKINESIS (ie. war) from a
BIPARTITE worldview such as ISLAM which has its own ANTHROPOLOGICAL
CONSTRUCT of SUBJECT WILL as claim to piety.
As a #468 - PERPLEXING QUESTION upon ICONOCLASM raised against the
BIPARTITE v's TRIPARTITE usage against this same #71 - DOMINION array
construct, we've expanded the hypothetical consideration applicable to
GEORGE FLOYD's "I can't breath" death by continual exertion of force
in total dominion as an extremely high acumen -/+ of those #n anchors
which may be the result of adverse behavioural reinforcement as
belligerence (ie. not necessarily reciprocated) that spirals to its
ultimate end as iconoclasm (ie.
Byzantine Greek εἰκονοκλάστης [TELOS: #984 (BY ISOPSEPHY) dolióō
(G1387): *DECEIT*, eidōleîon (G1493): *TEMPLE* *OF* *IDOLS*, echthrós
(G2190): *HOSTILE*; *OPPOSING* *GOD* *IN* *THE* *MIND*; *DEMONIC* *AS*
*BITTER* *ENEMY* *OF* *THE* *DIVINE* *GOVERNMENT*, syníēmi (G4920):
*COMBATANTS*, MALE: #468 - PERPLEXING QUESTION, FEME: #417 - CAUSE OR
REASON, DEME: #155 - JUDGE OR UMPIRE] as etymology from εἰκών (eikṓn,
“figure, icon, pattern, archetype”) + κλάω (kláō, “to break, weaken,
frustrate”) + -της (-tēs, agent suffix representing a state of being)
) against the #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY which is constitutionally
intrinsic to the ontology of the human being (ie. homo sapiens)
reflecting IMAGO DEI.
#885 as [#5, #10, #20, #800, #50] = eikṓn (G1504): {UMBRA: #885 % #41
= #24} 1) an image, figure, likeness; 1a) *AN* *IMAGE* *OF* *THE*
*THINGS* (*THE* *HEAVENLY* *THINGS*); 1a1) used of the moral likeness
of renewed men to God; 1a2) the image of the Son of God, into which
true Christians are transformed, is likeness not only to the heavenly
body, but also to the most holy and blessed state of mind, which
Christ possesses; 1b) the image of one; 1b1) one in whom the likeness
of any one is seen; 1b2) *APPLIED* *TO* *MAN* *ON* *ACCOUNT* *OF*
*HIS* *POWER* *OF* *COMMAND*; 1b3) to Christ on account of his divine
nature and absolute moral excellence;
#257 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 23 JUNE 2023 as [#5, #20, #30, #1,
#200, #1] /
#851 as [#20, #30, #1, #800] = kláō (G2806): {UMBRA: #851 % #41 = #31}
1) *TO* *BREAK*; 1a) used in the NT of the *BREAKING* *OF* *BREAD*
*OR* *COMMUNION*;
#676 as [#80, #70, #10, #8, #300, #8, #200] = poiētḗs (G4163): {UMBRA:
#676 % #41 = #20} 1) a maker, a producer, author; 2) a doer,
performer; 2a) *ONE* *WHO* *OBEYS* *OR* *FULFILS* *THE* *LAW*; 3) a poet;
I'm not a lawyer and only possess a modicum of knowledge, but I think
that the relevant jurisprudent principle is CASUS DATAE LEGIS to
describe the circumstance of a BIPARTITE iconoclasm against the
TRIPARTITE premise of #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY as constitutionally
intrinsic to the ontology of the human being which would then conform
to IMMANUEL KANT'S representation of the unity of consciousness
linking together several other representations, or a representation of
their relation in a single concept (9: 101). In the Critique of Pure
Reason he characterizes judgment as [Pure general logic] deals with
concepts, judgments, and inferences, corresponding exactly to the
functions and order of those powers of the mind, which are
comprehended under the broad designation of understanding in general…
If the understanding in general is explained as the faculty of rules,
then the power of judgment is the faculty of subsuming under rules,
i.e., of determining whether something stands under a given rule
(CASUS DATAE LEGIS) or not. (A130-132/B170-172)
<https://plato.stanford.edu/Archives/Win2004/entries/kant-judgment/>
WHILST WE HAVE DESIGNATED THE SEMANTICAL BASIS FOR A RATIONAL FACULTY
OF RULES WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH THE ANTHROPOLOGICAL SINGULARITY as
IDEA TEMPLATE TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT (then as EMPRESS and
DEFENDER OF THE FAITH). And UNDOUBTEDLY the relevant jurisprudent
principle of CASUS DATAE LEGIS is known [and conjectured upon but not
with any substantial clarity].
"Kant restricts the sense of 'Judgment" to the act of "subsuming under
rules, that is, of distinguishing whether something falls under a
given rule or not (CASUS DATAE LEGIS)" (id. A 132-34, B 171-74). This
sense is borrowed from lawyerly usage, not from logic, for, as Kant
shows, logic has nothing to say regarding this operation. There are,
and there can be, no rules regarding the application of rules. If Kant
is right, a sizeable part of what we take to be "law," and almost all
jurisprudence, are nothing but a futile striving to overcome this
essential unruliness of judgment. How can it be that the saying of law
is lawless?
Perhaps, however, even to lawyers, the essence of a judgment does not
lie in the application of a rule to a particular case, but rather in
the statement, or restatement, of the rule to be applied (eg: #451 -
PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY OF WHICH THERE IS NO KNOWLEDGE). If law consists
of rules, and if rules themselves are general propositions stating
obligations in general terms, then the properly 'judicial" in a
judgment would bet he stating of rules. The"case"would then matter
only as providing an occasion for such a ruling. If so, 'Judging,"
juridictio, would find its most manifest instantiation in what we call
"legislation," legisatio, from legem tollere, the elevation of a lex,
or statute, to its position of authority, which is always at once also
the corresponding degradation of another.
Kant too, perhaps following this unmistakable hint of language, found
a kind of judgment in which the casus itself was manifestly decided,
indeed incontrovertibly, although the rule under which the fallen case
fell was still to be found, and would eventually deny itself entirely
to man's power to say. To this type of judgment, he devoted the most
heroic of his works, which he called a critique of the power of
judgment, Kritik der Urteilskraft. There the will to judge seems to
run up against its outer limits. In what sense indeed is there still a
'Judgment," that is, a saying of law, when the supposed "law"
withdraws into ineffability?" [Vanderbuilt Law Review, Volume 48,
Issue 4 Issue 4 - May 1995]
To that end we've included the broader statement on an identified
CHRISTOLOGICAL AND METASCHEMA OF EVASION WITH PARADIGM EQUIVALENCE TO
FASCIST IDENTITY (ie. the BIPARTITE @1 - SOVEREIGN AUTONOMY DYNAMIC /
@5 - STATE AS ITS INVENTION), from which you can conclude that if
ISLAM has a CIRCUMSTANTIAL / SPECULATIVE CHRISTOLOGY THAT HAS NO
CRUCIFIXION then IPSO FACTO it is a METASCHEMA OF EVASION that is
being deployed and detrimental to anything but its ANTHROPOLOGICAL
idealism.
#68 #11 #44
#17 #41 #65
#38 #71 #14
The TRIPARTITE use of a temporal heuristic as metakosmeo which has an
implicit conception of autonomy rather than a bipartite
HETEROS-AFFECTION (ie. I utilised this in relation to the #328 -
TRANSFORMATION PROTOTYPE as its therapeutic imperative) stricture such
as the NUMI / NUMEN AUGUSTI [#38, #71, #14] metakinesis inducement as
imposition [#17, #41, #65] made upon autonomy.
On that physiological basis the police member's presumption of guilt
resulting in the elimination of GEORGE FLOYD is mitigated. Any
implicit adverse institutional [#68, #11, #44] imperative which is
self evident since we stated it before the findings of those systemic
prejudices were made known, ought not be ipso facto imputed against
the police officer's #237 - USE OF FORCE as an AUTO-AFFECTIVE action.
Again, using the same #71 - DOMINION array construct, it ought to be
possible to resolve the #468: PERPLEXING QUESTION (#17) of prudent
#519: discernment (#68) made in relation to the #495: seminal cause
(#44) for the exercising of #462: dominion (#11) corresponding to
#465: limits (#14) and the viability of #492: freewill (#41).
#123 as [#40, #1, #10, #2, #10, #20, #600] = ʼôyêb (H341): {UMBRA: #13
% #41 = #13} 1) (Qal) *ENEMY*; 1a) personal; 1b) national;
#516 (-> #65) - *METAKOSMEO* *ASSOCIATOR* as [#6, #8, #6, #90, #6,
#400] /
#519 (-> #68) as [#8, #6, #90, #400, #10, #5] /
#522 (-> #71) as [#2, #8, #6, #90, #400, #10, #6] = chûwts (H2351):
{UMBRA: #104 % #41 = #22} 1) *OUTSIDE*, outward, street, the outside;
As the need for an enquiry method to determine viability of the
DOMINION array [] to assay the #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY for viable
action. A high acumen -/+ of those #n anchors is evidence of prudent
rather than instinctive action.
Whilst my usage of language is not as superlative, I AM (ie. I = #123
- JUDGEMENT SENSIBILITY / INTELLECT, AM = #82 - TERMS OF COMPLIANCE:
@491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY TO @1 - SELF) nevertheless able within
a TRIPARTITE paradigm as grounding for perspective to then accommodate
by syncretic progression DERRIDA's obtuse semantical construct which
is a BIPARTITE encapsulation of being as: "what he is trying to do
with auto-affection: if the auto-position, the automonstrative
autotely of the ‘I,’ even in the human, implies the ‘I’ to be an other
that must welcome within itself some irreducible hetero-affection."
Simply expressed as an ontic premise, if there are reciprocal I = #123
- judgement sensibility / intellect, then an obligating norm is
implied as conformity to rule-based conventions:
#246 (ANTI-THESIS) - UTTERANCE; ACTIONS / #410 - OBLIGATING NORM (rule
based: BEAR NO FALSE WITNESS)
I did convey that a historical dependence upon the LUOSHU reference
object introduces an anthropological idealism associative to the META
LOGIC FALLACY within its #38 - *JUPITER* *PRINCIPLE* as aesthetic (ie.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 498 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 00:24:13 |
| Calls: | 9,820 |
| Calls today: | 8 |
| Files: | 13,757 |
| Messages: | 6,190,173 |