DOLF @ 1132 HOURS ON 10 FEBRUARY 2024: "I detect more slander by just
three lines as a guide for attaining the center of perfection.
No I'm a #983 - Philólogos (G5378): *LOVER* *OF* *THE* *WORD* = #33 - CLOSENESS (MI) + #48 - RITUAL (LI) + #902 (#451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY
x 2) - archḗ (G746): *FIRST* *PRINCIPLES* / Pharisaîos (G5330): *OPPOSITION* *TO* *ROMAN* / *CATHOLIC* *RULE* and the latter as JEWISH
of which the APOSTLE PAUL was a proponent, practices circumcision which
is a rejection of phallus or MARRIAGE / #1827 - EUCHARIST IDOLATROUS
WORSHIP, whilst being a Jewish / Gentile Christian I do not engage in
such #48 - RITUAL (LI) AS #6 - CONTRARIETY (LI) practices.
However on that question, I provide an opinion of some 58 pages which substantiates my sapient religious belief in conforming to that of the
JEWISH / GENTILE CHRISTIANS of that era.
Do cease your CHRISTO-FASCIST ANTI-SEMITISM for we will not cast what is sacred to the profane whether yourself or AFRICANS as JESUS JANGLERS
like KANYE WEST."
SEE ALSO: "INFORMAL RESEARCH NOTES ON JERUSALEM COUNCIL 50 CE CONFORMING
TO COGITO ARRAY AS IMAGO DEI WHICH BEING AN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IS NOT
THEN ANY PROVIDENCE OF THE PAPAL AUTHORITY / ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH"
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Notes%20on%20Jerusalem%20Council%2020240119.pdf>
MICHAEL [TIN MAN] CHRIST @ 1211 HRS ON 10 FEBRUARY 2024: "Nothing, you
detect nothing that does not centre itself on thy will be done.
A typical sinner Christian."
DOLF @ 1317 HOURS ON 10 FEBRUARY 2024: "Thy will be done?
Is that a MORAL, IMMORAL or an AMORAL will and can it be codified:
"MAKEST THY BOAST OF GOD, AND KNOWEST HIS WILL, AND APPROVEST THE THINGS
THAT ARE MORE EXCELLENT, BEING INSTRUCTED OUT OF THE LAW (ie. shǒu fǎ (守法): TO ABIDE BY THE LAW AS COGITO #57 - GUARDEDNESS (SHOU) - 𝌾守 = #508 / #40 - LAW / MODEL (FA) - 𝌭法 = #491) ..." [Romans 2:17-18]
Your reprobate response is irrational."
MICHAEL [TIN MAN] CHRIST @ 1607 HRS ON 10 FEBRUARY 2024: "Have it your
way."
EMAIL TO MICHAEL NYLAN (BERKELEY.EDU) @ 1500 HOURS ON 10 FEBRUARY 2024: "WHETHER THERE WAS CULTURAL EXCHANGE BETWEEN HAN DYNASTY CHINESE DAOIST SCHOOL OF THOUGHT / TORAH JUDAISM?
A consideration on whether there was a CULTURAL EXCHANGE between HAN
DYNASTY CHINESE DAOist school of thought / TORAH JUDAISM especially
given 104 BCE (ie. 103 if no zero year for 19 year metonic lunar cycle
or 293 x 365.2423 tropical year or 294 x 364 day / years) and the consideration of ROMAN ERA political censure (a euphemism concerning the crucifixion as convenient opposition elimination) conveys both obscured
and dispersed comments, such as for instance within the EPISTLE TO THE
ROMANS there is made a comment about indebtedness to the GREEKS and the BARBARIANS [Romans 1:14] but that the ORACLES OF GOD [Romans 3:2] are a special intellectual possession of the JEWS and yet by the MORAL
PROSCRIPTION on the CHINESE: 貪財 (tāncái) / 貪求 (tānqiú) we're able to
see equivalent FIRST PRINCIPLES despite a lack of any documented SEVEN
day cosmogony until later antiquity.
#608 as [#3, #200, #400, #5] = gûwr (H1481): {UMBRA: #209 % #41 = #4} 1)
to sojourn, abide, dwell in, dwell with, remain, inhabit, be a stranger,
be continuing, surely; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) *TO* *SOJOURN*, *DWELL* *FOR* *A* *TIME*; 1a2) to abide, stay, temporarily dwell; 1b) (Hithpolel); 1b1) to
seek hospitality with; 1b2) to assemble oneself; 1c) to stir up trouble, strife, quarrel, gather together; 1c1) (Qal); i) to stir up strife; ii)
to quarrel; 1c2) (Hithpolel) to excite oneself; 1d) to dread, fear,
stand in awe, be afraid; 1d1) (Qal); i) to fear, be afraid; ii) to be in
awe, stand in awe;
#608 as [#80, #1, #100, #5, #80, #10, #4, #8, #40, #70, #10, #200] = parepídēmos (G3927): {UMBRA: #598 % #41 = #24} 1) *ONE* *WHO* *COMES* *FROM* *A* *FOREIGN* *COUNTRY* *INTO* *A* *CITY* *OR* *LAND* *TO*
*RESIDE* *THERE* *BY* *THE* *SIDE* *OF* *THE* *NATIVES*; 2) a stranger;
3) sojourning in a strange place, a foreigner; 4) in the NT metaph. in reference to heaven as the native country, one who sojourns on earth;
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?idea:608>
The common teleological notion #608 - *SILK* would appear to imply such,
but when did it first occur and was it recursive at diverse times over centuries? The LUOSHU SQUARE is clearly a western philosophy
indebtedness to oriental thought and accordingly the BABYLONIAN "THE
GREAT MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH" ASSOCIATION is
then a question about viable FOUNDATIONS to the ROMAN STATE and its
WORLDVIEW (eg: RUSSIA only adopted the GREGORIAN CALENDAR upon 14
FEBRUARY 1918 pursuant to a Sovnarkom decree signed 24 JANUARY 1918
(Julian) by VLADIMIR LENIN) whether CATHOLIC, ISLAM or ORTHODOX being an artifice of obmutescence concerning a seething iniquitous maleficence as
its only claim to an exquisite piety which has no association with ours.
The only undoubted explicit reference of silk within the Bible occurs in [Revelation 18:12] where it is mentioned among the treasures of the
typical BABYLON.
#608 as [#200, #8, #100, #10, #20, #70, #200] = sērikós (G4596): {UMBRA: #608 % #41 = #34} 1) made of silk; 2) *SILK*, i.e. the fabric, silken garments;
According to accounts it is however, in the highest degree probable that
the texture was known to the Hebrews from the time that their commercial relations were extended by KING SOLOMON (reigned: 970-930 BCE).
MICHAEL NYLAN (BERKELEY.EDU) @ 0803 HOURS ON 11 FEBRUARY 2024: "WHETHER
THERE WAS CULTURAL EXCHANGE BETWEEN HAN DYNASTY CHINESE DAOIST SCHOOL OF THOUGHT / TORAH JUDAISM?
If you knew my work, you would know that there was no Daoist school of thought in the Han.
That there may have been cross-cultural borrowings goes without saying.
But the direction of borrowing is not always clear, nor can such
borrowings be proven,
since many ideas are independently developed in different cultures."
If I may state this very politely but nonetheless with great clarity, it
is a matter of concern to myself that in having engaged within urgent
labour in relation to the NEW YORK TERRORIST ATTACK dated 11 SEPTEMBER
2001 concerning its being a TRIPARTITE v's BIPARTITE NUMBER META LOGIC
issue as the possibility of it having an impetus as systemic BIPARTITE
NUMBER foundation of ISLAMIC BELIEF being consequential to a conformity
with REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM AS TABLE TALK IDEA #303 - 28 AUGUST 1942 which specifically relates to “NEW YORK SKY-SCRAPERS: THEIR VULNERABILITY TO
AIR ATTACK” which a perusal of your academic research appears to convey
by COGITO #45 - GREATNESS (TA) - 𝌲大 = #496 / [#23, #55, #54, #50, #35].
#568 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #182 as [#2, #40, #90, #30, #6, #400] = mᵉtsôwlâh (H4688): {UMBRA: #171 % #41 = #7} 1) *DEPTH*, the deep, the deep sea;
REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM AS IDEA #303 - 28 AUGUST 1942: "The *DEPTH* of the foundations of some sky-scrapers in New York is as much as seventy
metres, and the driving of the cement foundation demands a pressure of
six or eight thousand hundredweights. An air raid, such as those against London, would have a devastating effect on New York. It would be
physically impossible to clear the débris, and it is not possible to
build air-raid shelters.” [page 669]

<https://vcresearch.berkeley.edu/faculty/michael-nylan>
[MICHAEL NYLAN IS A PROFESSOR IN THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY, UNIVERSITY
OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY]
I quite accept your DISTINGUISHED scholarly opinion "IF YOU KNEW MY
WORK, YOU WOULD KNOW THAT THERE WAS NO DAOIST SCHOOL OF THOUGHT IN THE
HAN" as punctilious #65 - INNER (NEI) - 𝍆內 = #516 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY / [#25, #76, #47, #59, #57] custodian (ie. THE UNAVOIDABLE ANALOGY IS TO EITHER A *DUTIFUL* *CATHOLIC* *WIFE* *IN* *THE* *KITCHEN*
OR ONE WITH *POISON* *ON* *A* *COMFORT* *WOMAN'S* *LIPS* *IN* *THE* *FÜHRERBUNKER* BENEATH THE REICH CHANCELLERY GARDEN AND AS TO WHETHER IT INCLUDED ROSES REMAINS A FASCINATING PIECE OF ARCHITECTURAL AND
POLITICAL HISTORY OVER ANY CLANDESTINED CATHOLIC UBER ALLES MENTALITY
AND ANTI-SEMITISM) of early Chinese history from the fifth century BC to
the fifth century AD, with an emphasis on the sociopolitical context
such as myths and rituals, aesthetic theories and material culture,
belief: "No translation can ever hope to fully suggest the intricate
beauty of the original text by YANG HSIUNG. My hope is simply that this
study will revive interest in this important thinker. It is an
invitation to others to enter into the pleasures of HAN PHILOSOPHY.
[NYLAN, page xi]
YANG HSIUNG (53 B.C.A.D. 18) initially won fame under EMPEROR CH'ENG
(r. 33-7 B.C.) for long prose-poems (fu) whose satirical content was cloaked in lush imagery, hyperbole, and allusion. By the reign of
EMPEROR AI (r. 71 B.C.), however, YANG HSIUNG had redirected his considerable talents to the writing of two philosophical works, the FA
YEN (MODEL SAYINGS) and the T'AI HSÜAN CHING (CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY) ...
The initial difficulty, of course, lay in determining the exact
boundaries of each logical category, so that inferences were not
mistakenly drawn. Generations of Chinese scholars, first the early
Logicians and later the Han scholastics, devoted a great deal of time
and energy to this problem. Due to the occasional rift between logic and language, their first task was to establish formal rules of logic (ie.
ON 28 JANUARY 2024 WE RAISED WITH YOURSELF AN IMPORTANT ISSUE OF
VARIANCE TO THE META-DESCRIPTOR NOMENCLATURE, RETENTION OF AGENCY INTEROPERABILITY AND ITS SUITABLE REPRESENTATION OF FACULTY
REQUIREMENTS. FOR INSTANCE WE NOTE THAT THE FOLLOWING CAN BE NUANCED
AND THAT OUR PRIOR ASSUMPTIONS CONFORMED TO THE COGITO PREMISES OR
DIALECTIC TO A DEVISED NEURAL LINGUISTIC PRAGMA:
#52 - MEASURE --> CANON = kanṓn (G2583):
#68 - DIMMING --> RIGHTS
#71 - STOPPAGE --> WORLDVIEW
AND PROVIDED TO YOU THE PROPOSITION OF THE COGITO ARRAY AS THEN THE MEAN
FOR CONSCIOUSNESS AS IMAGO DEI) by which to discover the defining characteristics of each entity in the universe, so that essential
attributes could be clearly distinguished from accidental attributes...
While it was relatively simple to agree upon fundamental definitions for animals, shapes, and inanimate objects, the true definition of human
nature was a thornier problem, as it touched upon a host of problems
which stubbornly resisted solution by the logical method:
- What is the proper definition of human nature?
- What is the proper sphere and existential significance of human activity?
- What can humans reasonably hope to accomplish in this life?
In the Han Confucian synthesis, then, the proto-scientist's impulse
towards categorization and the logician's search for orderly expression joined forces with the ethical concerns of the traditional scholar. Categorical thinking, inherently preoccupied with the relation of
macrocosm to microcosm, came to be applied to many areas of inquiry,
most significantly (1) portent theory; (2) the rectification of names;
and (3) point-by-point analogies between the human body, the body politic, and the universe. We are familiar enough with body analogies;
we often talk of "heads of state," for example. Portent theory and the rectification of names, however, may need some explanation for the
modern reader. {NYLAN, page 67]
The impact of YANG HSIUNG'S PHILOSOPHY on later Chinese thought is undeniable. The historian PAN KU (32-92 CE) revered YANG HSIUNG as one
of the THREE GREAT CONFUCIAN PHILOSOPHERS OF WESTERN HAN, in company
with LIU HSIANG and LIU HSIN. PAN KU'S opinion was shared by the leading Eastern Han thinkers, including HUAN T'AN, WANG CH'UNG, CHANG HENG, YING SHAO, and Sung Chung, all of whom appreciated the breadth and critical
acumen of YANG HSIUNG'S writings. Through them, the T'AI HSÜAN provided inspiration and vocabulary for the HSÜAN HSÜEH movement (in Chinese, "Mystery Learning") of the post-Han period. The Mystery, in fact,
continued to greatly influence Chinese thought for a millennium, until prominent SUNG thinkers like SU HSÜN (1009-1066) and CHU HSI
(1130-1200) applied contemporary standards retroactively to YANG
HSIUNG, thereby discrediting him on three counts:
(a) his service at the court of the "usurper" WANG MANG (r. 923);
(b) his outright rejection of the theory of human nature proposed by the Confucian master Mencius (c. 371-289); and
(c) his supposed presumption in composing ''classics" in imitation of
the sages. [NYLAN, pages 1, 2]
Of course, YANG HSIUNG could claim to be emulating the model of
Confucius, who "seldom spoke of ming," presumably because the most
sacred aspects of human existence are taboo. But it is no less likely
that YANG'S reticence is meant to entice the reader to embark upon that step-by-step immersion in the sage-author's mind that SCHOOLS THE READER IN THE MORAL PROCESS ITSELF.
#12 - 𝌑童 = #463 - PRINCIPLE OF EMANATION / SABBATH
#17 - 𝌖䎡 = #468 - TERMS OF COMPLIANCE / HONOUR PARENTS
#26 - 𝌟務 = #477 - JUDGEMENT SENSIBILITY / DO NOT KILL
#65 - 𝍆內 = #516 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY / AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY
#66 - 𝍇去 = #517 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENCE / DO NOT STEAL
#71 - 𝍌止 = #522 - OBLIGATING NORM APPRAISAL / DON'T BEAR FALSE WITNESS #76 - 𝍑劇 = #527 - MANIFESTING NORM APPRAISAL / DO NOT COVET
YANG HSIUNG imbedded the necessary clues to his solution for ming in
three linked statements. The longest passage begins:
Someone asked about ming. I replied, "Ming refers to the decrees of
Heaven. It has nothing to do with people's actions." "If people's
actions do not constitute ming, I beg to ask what about people's
actions?" I responded: "By [their actions] they may be preserved or
lost; by them they may live or die. [Still,] that is not ming. Ming
refers to what cannot be avoided."
A second passage from the Mystery echoes the last line of the preceding statement with one important change; it substitutes "time" for ming or
the Decree, saying, "TIME IS WHAT CANNOT BE OVERCOME." And a third
passage repeats the association of ming with time in defining the Decree
as "what is timely or not."
YANG HSIUNG'S first statement about ming suggests that "fate" is an
adequate translation for the term if we do not invest it with
supernatural overtones. Ming in referring to time (meaning "present circumstance" as well as "opportune time") describes the involuntary and imposed part of human existence that will not change through individual effort. [NYLAN, pages 39, 40]
The early Chinese assumed that the transition from primordial chaos to civilized order represented successive stages of increasing
differentiation. In effect, the Chinese argued that the world as they
knew it had evolved by a process analogous to human attempts to
identify, demarcate, and name significant geographical, political,
social, and religious boundaries. [NOMES OF EGYPT TO NOMOS OF GREEKS BUT
IS THERE SUCH FOR SAPIENCE?]From this they concluded that there existed
in the primordial Tao a divine basis for the development of the various
human orders. Some Han thinkers even argued that humans engaged in the
search for intrinsic categories can further or complete the cosmic
processes through their continual ordering and reordering of categories.
This helps to explain why categorical thinking and correlative thought
figure so largely in Chinese philosophical writings. [NYLAN, page 68]
Among modern translators, no consensus exists about the proper
definition of ming; the term is most often rendered as fate or Decree
(as in my own introductory remarks), but it is also translated as
variously as "duty," "destiny," "predestination," "causal connections
and their possibilities," "manifestation of Heaven's will," "the
inevitable," "empirical facts," "created world," "lifespan," "objective circumstances," "circumstances beyond human control," and so on. The
problem is not simply one of translation. Any Chinese of YANG HSIUNG'S
time would have found a bewildering array of usages for the term, some mutually contradictory. In part, the confusion stemmed from a typical
feature of Chinese classical philosophy, in which rival thinkers
consciously used the same terminology to articulate significantly
different ideas. But there were also unconscious adoptions of meanings through conceptual overlays and etymological extensions as the
so-called "Hundred Schools" of philosophy emerged from the earlier religious matrix.
THERE IS THE OBVIOUS CONSIDERATION ABOUT THE INNATE LACK (ie. IF YOU
KNEW MY WORK we'd know that you've put "schools" in QUOTATION MARKS TO INDICATE MY OWN DISTRUST of the attempt by many scholars to pigeonhole
the works of various thinkers into different "schools") OF ACADEMIC
INTEGRITY and is it any different to Samuele R. Bacchiocchi [29 January
1938 to 20 December 2008] getting doctoral thesis on "FROM SABBATH TO
SUNDAY" from the Pontifical Gregorian University?
Do we have to ask, whether such CONTEMPTUOUS NONCHALANCE (ie. perhaps
just my reply will be so pre-occupying much like throwing a dog a bone)
as reply a SUBSTANTIAL ENQUIRY is entirely due to your ACADEMIC COHORT
upon that issue being RAOUL BIRNBAUM, as to whether he is in any manner related PIERRE BIRNBAUM as visiting PROFESSOR OF JEWISH STUDIES AT
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY and therefore a proponent of NOACHIDE LAWS (in
CONTRA to COGITO #26 - ENDEAVOUR (WU) 𝌟務 = #477 - JUDGEMENT SENSIBILITY [#23, #48, #36, #81, #54] ENDORSED BY THE AMERICAN CONGRESS ON 13 APRIL
1992 AS 106 STATUTE 102 PUBLIC LAW 102-268 DESIGNATING 14 APRIL 1992 as EDUCATION AND SHARING DAY USA) for UNTOUCHABLE GOY FILTH reinforced by
recent ANTI-ZIONIST / TORAH JEWISH CONDUCT post 7 OCTOBER 2023 and their prohibitions on DISSEMINATING TORAH KNOWLEDGE as WORLDVIEW of IDOLATRY
in denial and its INEVITABLE NIHILISTIC CONSEQUENCE as we conveyed by
email on 1500 HOURS ON 10 FEBRUARY 2023, is the consideration of ROMAN
ERA political censure (a pious euphemism concerning death or crucifixion
for convenient opposition elimination [Acts 3:14, 26:21; Philippians
3:4-6] and more recently the WORLD JEWISH CONGRESS opened an OFFICE IN
THE VATICAN ON 19 OCTOBER 2023 in preparation for the GREATEST WHITEWASH
OF HUMAN HISTORY 1939-1945 as genocide not seen since JESUS OF NAZARETH
was linen wrapped and placed within a SEPULCHRE as COGITO #33 -
CLOSENESS (MI) - 𝌦密 = #484: 3 APRIL 33 CE [#49, #75, #62, #22, #22]
that the BIBLICAL NEW TESTAMENT record as a matter of survival, conveys
both obscured and dispersed commentary.
I CANNOT RECONCILE THE AMERICAN CONGRESS LAW ON MASQUERADING JEWISH
IDOLATRY WITH THE GOD ALMIGHTY BLASPHEMOUS SENILE AMERICAN IRISH
CATHOLIC PRESIDENT PRAYING A ROSARY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RELIGIOUS FALSEHOODS AND DICTUMS OF CATHOLIC CHRISTO FASCIST STATE:
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?male:226&feme:242&ontic:146&deme:71&idea:242>
#137 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #146 as [#30, #2, #50, #10, #5, #40] /
#1002 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #146 as [#300, #2, #700] = bên (H1121): {UMBRA: #52 % #41 = #11} 1) son, grandson, child, member of a group; 1a)
son, male child; 1b) grandson; 1c) children (pl. - male and female); 1d) youth, young men (pl.); 1e) young (of animals); 1f) sons (as characterisation, i.e. sons of injustice [for un- righteous men] or sons
of God [for angels]; 1g) *PEOPLE* (*OF* *A* *NATION*) (pl.); 1h) of
lifeless things, i.e. sparks, stars, arrows (fig.); 1i) a member of a
guild, order, class;
#39 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #146 as [#6, #10, #5, #10, #2, #6] /
#77 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #146 as [#10, #5, #2, #10, #50] = yᵉhab (H3052): {UMBRA: #17 % #41 = #17} 1) to give, provide; 1a) (P'al); 1a1)
to give; 1a2) to place, *LAY* (*FOUNDATIONS*); 1b) (Hithp'al); 1b1) to
be given; 1b2) to be paid;
#78 - MALE CHECKSUM TOTAL: #226 as [#8, #60, #4, #6] = chêçêd (H2617): {UMBRA: #72 % #41 = #31} 1) goodness, *KINDNESS*, faithfulness; 2) a reproach, shame;
#719 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #71 as [#2, #6, #200, #1, #10, #500] = bârâʼ
DOLF @ 1132 HOURS ON 10 FEBRUARY 2024: "I detect more slander by just
three lines as a guide for attaining the center of perfection.
No I'm a #983 - Philólogos (G5378): *LOVER* *OF* *THE* *WORD* = #33 - CLOSENESS (MI) + #48 - RITUAL (LI) + #902 (#451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY
x 2) - archḗ (G746): *FIRST* *PRINCIPLES* / Pharisaîos (G5330): *OPPOSITION* *TO* *ROMAN* / *CATHOLIC* *RULE* and the latter as JEWISH
of which the APOSTLE PAUL was a proponent, practices circumcision which
is a rejection of phallus or MARRIAGE / #1827 - EUCHARIST IDOLATROUS
WORSHIP, whilst being a Jewish / Gentile Christian I do not engage in
such #48 - RITUAL (LI) AS #6 - CONTRARIETY (LI) practices.
However on that question, I provide an opinion of some 58 pages which substantiates my sapient religious belief in conforming to that of the
JEWISH / GENTILE CHRISTIANS of that era.
Do cease your CHRISTO-FASCIST ANTI-SEMITISM for we will not cast what is sacred to the profane whether yourself or AFRICANS as JESUS JANGLERS
like KANYE WEST."
SEE ALSO: "INFORMAL RESEARCH NOTES ON JERUSALEM COUNCIL 50 CE CONFORMING
TO COGITO ARRAY AS IMAGO DEI WHICH BEING AN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IS NOT
THEN ANY PROVIDENCE OF THE PAPAL AUTHORITY / ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH"
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Notes%20on%20Jerusalem%20Council%2020240119.pdf>
MICHAEL [TIN MAN] CHRIST @ 1211 HRS ON 10 FEBRUARY 2024: "Nothing, you
detect nothing that does not centre itself on thy will be done.
A typical sinner Christian."
DOLF @ 1317 HOURS ON 10 FEBRUARY 2024: "Thy will be done?
Is that a MORAL, IMMORAL or an AMORAL will and can it be codified:
"MAKEST THY BOAST OF GOD, AND KNOWEST HIS WILL, AND APPROVEST THE THINGS
THAT ARE MORE EXCELLENT, BEING INSTRUCTED OUT OF THE LAW (ie. shǒu fǎ (守法): TO ABIDE BY THE LAW AS COGITO #57 - GUARDEDNESS (SHOU) - 𝌾守 = #508 / #40 - LAW / MODEL (FA) - 𝌭法 = #491) ..." [Romans 2:17-18]
Your reprobate response is irrational."
MICHAEL [TIN MAN] CHRIST @ 1607 HRS ON 10 FEBRUARY 2024: "Have it your
way."
EMAIL TO MICHAEL NYLAN (BERKELEY.EDU) @ 1500 HOURS ON 10 FEBRUARY 2024: "WHETHER THERE WAS CULTURAL EXCHANGE BETWEEN HAN DYNASTY CHINESE DAOIST SCHOOL OF THOUGHT / TORAH JUDAISM?
A consideration on whether there was a CULTURAL EXCHANGE between HAN
DYNASTY CHINESE DAOist school of thought / TORAH JUDAISM especially
given 104 BCE (ie. 103 if no zero year for 19 year metonic lunar cycle
or 293 x 365.2423 tropical year or 294 x 364 day / years) and the consideration of ROMAN ERA political censure (a euphemism concerning the crucifixion as convenient opposition elimination) conveys both obscured
and dispersed comments, such as for instance within the EPISTLE TO THE
ROMANS there is made a comment about indebtedness to the GREEKS and the BARBARIANS [Romans 1:14] but that the ORACLES OF GOD [Romans 3:2] are a special intellectual possession of the JEWS and yet by the MORAL
PROSCRIPTION on the CHINESE: 貪財 (tāncái) / 貪求 (tānqiú) we're able to
see equivalent FIRST PRINCIPLES despite a lack of any documented SEVEN
day cosmogony until later antiquity.
#608 as [#3, #200, #400, #5] = gûwr (H1481): {UMBRA: #209 % #41 = #4} 1)
to sojourn, abide, dwell in, dwell with, remain, inhabit, be a stranger,
be continuing, surely; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) *TO* *SOJOURN*, *DWELL* *FOR* *A* *TIME*; 1a2) to abide, stay, temporarily dwell; 1b) (Hithpolel); 1b1) to
seek hospitality with; 1b2) to assemble oneself; 1c) to stir up trouble, strife, quarrel, gather together; 1c1) (Qal); i) to stir up strife; ii)
to quarrel; 1c2) (Hithpolel) to excite oneself; 1d) to dread, fear,
stand in awe, be afraid; 1d1) (Qal); i) to fear, be afraid; ii) to be in
awe, stand in awe;
#608 as [#80, #1, #100, #5, #80, #10, #4, #8, #40, #70, #10, #200] = parepídēmos (G3927): {UMBRA: #598 % #41 = #24} 1) *ONE* *WHO* *COMES* *FROM* *A* *FOREIGN* *COUNTRY* *INTO* *A* *CITY* *OR* *LAND* *TO*
*RESIDE* *THERE* *BY* *THE* *SIDE* *OF* *THE* *NATIVES*; 2) a stranger;
3) sojourning in a strange place, a foreigner; 4) in the NT metaph. in reference to heaven as the native country, one who sojourns on earth;
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?idea:608>
The common teleological notion #608 - *SILK* would appear to imply such,
but when did it first occur and was it recursive at diverse times over centuries? The LUOSHU SQUARE is clearly a western philosophy
indebtedness to oriental thought and accordingly the BABYLONIAN "THE
GREAT MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH" ASSOCIATION is
then a question about viable FOUNDATIONS to the ROMAN STATE and its
WORLDVIEW (eg: RUSSIA only adopted the GREGORIAN CALENDAR upon 14
FEBRUARY 1918 pursuant to a Sovnarkom decree signed 24 JANUARY 1918
(Julian) by VLADIMIR LENIN) whether CATHOLIC, ISLAM or ORTHODOX being an artifice of obmutescence concerning a seething iniquitous maleficence as
its only claim to an exquisite piety which has no association with ours.
The only undoubted explicit reference of silk within the Bible occurs in [Revelation 18:12] where it is mentioned among the treasures of the
typical BABYLON.
#608 as [#200, #8, #100, #10, #20, #70, #200] = sērikós (G4596): {UMBRA: #608 % #41 = #34} 1) made of silk; 2) *SILK*, i.e. the fabric, silken garments;
According to accounts it is however, in the highest degree probable that
the texture was known to the Hebrews from the time that their commercial relations were extended by KING SOLOMON (reigned: 970-930 BCE).
MICHAEL NYLAN (BERKELEY.EDU) @ 0803 HOURS ON 11 FEBRUARY 2024: "WHETHER
THERE WAS CULTURAL EXCHANGE BETWEEN HAN DYNASTY CHINESE DAOIST SCHOOL OF THOUGHT / TORAH JUDAISM?
If you knew my work, you would know that there was no Daoist school of thought in the Han.
That there may have been cross-cultural borrowings goes without saying.
But the direction of borrowing is not always clear, nor can such
borrowings be proven,
since many ideas are independently developed in different cultures."
If I may state this very politely but nonetheless with great clarity, it
is a matter of concern to myself that in having engaged within urgent
labour in relation to the NEW YORK TERRORIST ATTACK dated 11 SEPTEMBER
2001 concerning its being a TRIPARTITE v's BIPARTITE NUMBER META LOGIC
issue as the possibility of it having an impetus as systemic BIPARTITE
NUMBER foundation of ISLAMIC BELIEF being consequential to a conformity
with REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM AS TABLE TALK IDEA #303 - 28 AUGUST 1942 which specifically relates to “NEW YORK SKY-SCRAPERS: THEIR VULNERABILITY TO
AIR ATTACK” which a perusal of your academic research appears to convey
by COGITO #45 - GREATNESS (TA) - 𝌲大 = #496 / [#23, #55, #54, #50, #35].
#568 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #182 as [#2, #40, #90, #30, #6, #400] = mᵉtsôwlâh (H4688): {UMBRA: #171 % #41 = #7} 1) *DEPTH*, the deep, the deep sea;
REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM AS IDEA #303 - 28 AUGUST 1942: "The *DEPTH* of the foundations of some sky-scrapers in New York is as much as seventy
metres, and the driving of the cement foundation demands a pressure of
six or eight thousand hundredweights. An air raid, such as those against London, would have a devastating effect on New York. It would be
physically impossible to clear the débris, and it is not possible to
build air-raid shelters.” [page 669]

<https://vcresearch.berkeley.edu/faculty/michael-nylan>
[MICHAEL NYLAN IS A PROFESSOR IN THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY, UNIVERSITY
OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY]
I quite accept your DISTINGUISHED scholarly opinion "IF YOU KNEW MY
WORK, YOU WOULD KNOW THAT THERE WAS NO DAOIST SCHOOL OF THOUGHT IN THE
HAN" as punctilious #65 - INNER (NEI) - 𝍆內 = #516 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY / [#25, #76, #47, #59, #57] custodian (ie. THE UNAVOIDABLE ANALOGY IS TO EITHER A *DUTIFUL* *CATHOLIC* *WIFE* *IN* *THE* *KITCHEN*
OR ONE WITH *POISON* *ON* *A* *COMFORT* *WOMAN'S* *LIPS* *IN* *THE* *FÜHRERBUNKER* BENEATH THE REICH CHANCELLERY GARDEN AND AS TO WHETHER IT INCLUDED ROSES REMAINS A FASCINATING PIECE OF ARCHITECTURAL AND
POLITICAL HISTORY OVER ANY CLANDESTINED CATHOLIC UBER ALLES MENTALITY
AND ANTI-SEMITISM) of early Chinese history from the fifth century BC to
the fifth century AD, with an emphasis on the sociopolitical context
such as myths and rituals, aesthetic theories and material culture,
belief: "No translation can ever hope to fully suggest the intricate
beauty of the original text by YANG HSIUNG. My hope is simply that this
study will revive interest in this important thinker. It is an
invitation to others to enter into the pleasures of HAN PHILOSOPHY.
[NYLAN, page xi]
YANG HSIUNG (53 B.C.A.D. 18) initially won fame under EMPEROR CH'ENG
(r. 33-7 B.C.) for long prose-poems (fu) whose satirical content was cloaked in lush imagery, hyperbole, and allusion. By the reign of
EMPEROR AI (r. 71 B.C.), however, YANG HSIUNG had redirected his considerable talents to the writing of two philosophical works, the FA
YEN (MODEL SAYINGS) and the T'AI HSÜAN CHING (CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY) ...
The initial difficulty, of course, lay in determining the exact
boundaries of each logical category, so that inferences were not
mistakenly drawn. Generations of Chinese scholars, first the early
Logicians and later the Han scholastics, devoted a great deal of time
and energy to this problem. Due to the occasional rift between logic and language, their first task was to establish formal rules of logic (ie.
ON 28 JANUARY 2024 WE RAISED WITH YOURSELF AN IMPORTANT ISSUE OF
VARIANCE TO THE META-DESCRIPTOR NOMENCLATURE, RETENTION OF AGENCY INTEROPERABILITY AND ITS SUITABLE REPRESENTATION OF FACULTY
REQUIREMENTS. FOR INSTANCE WE NOTE THAT THE FOLLOWING CAN BE NUANCED
AND THAT OUR PRIOR ASSUMPTIONS CONFORMED TO THE COGITO PREMISES OR
DIALECTIC TO A DEVISED NEURAL LINGUISTIC PRAGMA:
#52 - MEASURE --> CANON = kanṓn (G2583):
#68 - DIMMING --> RIGHTS
#71 - STOPPAGE --> WORLDVIEW
AND PROVIDED TO YOU THE PROPOSITION OF THE COGITO ARRAY AS THEN THE MEAN
FOR CONSCIOUSNESS AS IMAGO DEI) by which to discover the defining characteristics of each entity in the universe, so that essential
attributes could be clearly distinguished from accidental attributes...
While it was relatively simple to agree upon fundamental definitions for animals, shapes, and inanimate objects, the true definition of human
nature was a thornier problem, as it touched upon a host of problems
which stubbornly resisted solution by the logical method:
- What is the proper definition of human nature?
- What is the proper sphere and existential significance of human activity?
- What can humans reasonably hope to accomplish in this life?
In the Han Confucian synthesis, then, the proto-scientist's impulse
towards categorization and the logician's search for orderly expression joined forces with the ethical concerns of the traditional scholar. Categorical thinking, inherently preoccupied with the relation of
macrocosm to microcosm, came to be applied to many areas of inquiry,
most significantly (1) portent theory; (2) the rectification of names;
and (3) point-by-point analogies between the human body, the body politic, and the universe. We are familiar enough with body analogies;
we often talk of "heads of state," for example. Portent theory and the rectification of names, however, may need some explanation for the
modern reader. {NYLAN, page 67]
The impact of YANG HSIUNG'S PHILOSOPHY on later Chinese thought is undeniable. The historian PAN KU (32-92 CE) revered YANG HSIUNG as one
of the THREE GREAT CONFUCIAN PHILOSOPHERS OF WESTERN HAN, in company
with LIU HSIANG and LIU HSIN. PAN KU'S opinion was shared by the leading Eastern Han thinkers, including HUAN T'AN, WANG CH'UNG, CHANG HENG, YING SHAO, and Sung Chung, all of whom appreciated the breadth and critical
acumen of YANG HSIUNG'S writings. Through them, the T'AI HSÜAN provided inspiration and vocabulary for the HSÜAN HSÜEH movement (in Chinese, "Mystery Learning") of the post-Han period. The Mystery, in fact,
continued to greatly influence Chinese thought for a millennium, until prominent SUNG thinkers like SU HSÜN (1009-1066) and CHU HSI
(1130-1200) applied contemporary standards retroactively to YANG
HSIUNG, thereby discrediting him on three counts:
(a) his service at the court of the "usurper" WANG MANG (r. 923);
(b) his outright rejection of the theory of human nature proposed by the Confucian master Mencius (c. 371-289); and
(c) his supposed presumption in composing ''classics" in imitation of
the sages. [NYLAN, pages 1, 2]
Of course, YANG HSIUNG could claim to be emulating the model of
Confucius, who "seldom spoke of ming," presumably because the most
sacred aspects of human existence are taboo. But it is no less likely
that YANG'S reticence is meant to entice the reader to embark upon that step-by-step immersion in the sage-author's mind that SCHOOLS THE READER IN THE MORAL PROCESS ITSELF.
#12 - 𝌑童 = #463 - PRINCIPLE OF EMANATION / SABBATH
#17 - 𝌖䎡 = #468 - TERMS OF COMPLIANCE / HONOUR PARENTS
#26 - 𝌟務 = #477 - JUDGEMENT SENSIBILITY / DO NOT KILL
#65 - 𝍆內 = #516 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY / AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY
#66 - 𝍇去 = #517 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENCE / DO NOT STEAL
#71 - 𝍌止 = #522 - OBLIGATING NORM APPRAISAL / DON'T BEAR FALSE WITNESS #76 - 𝍑劇 = #527 - MANIFESTING NORM APPRAISAL / DO NOT COVET
YANG HSIUNG imbedded the necessary clues to his solution for ming in
three linked statements. The longest passage begins:
Someone asked about ming. I replied, "Ming refers to the decrees of
Heaven. It has nothing to do with people's actions." "If people's
actions do not constitute ming, I beg to ask what about people's
actions?" I responded: "By [their actions] they may be preserved or
lost; by them they may live or die. [Still,] that is not ming. Ming
refers to what cannot be avoided."
A second passage from the Mystery echoes the last line of the preceding statement with one important change; it substitutes "time" for ming or
the Decree, saying, "TIME IS WHAT CANNOT BE OVERCOME." And a third
passage repeats the association of ming with time in defining the Decree
as "what is timely or not."
YANG HSIUNG'S first statement about ming suggests that "fate" is an
adequate translation for the term if we do not invest it with
supernatural overtones. Ming in referring to time (meaning "present circumstance" as well as "opportune time") describes the involuntary and imposed part of human existence that will not change through individual effort. [NYLAN, pages 39, 40]
The early Chinese assumed that the transition from primordial chaos to civilized order represented successive stages of increasing
differentiation. In effect, the Chinese argued that the world as they
knew it had evolved by a process analogous to human attempts to
identify, demarcate, and name significant geographical, political,
social, and religious boundaries. [NOMES OF EGYPT TO NOMOS OF GREEKS BUT
IS THERE SUCH FOR SAPIENCE?]From this they concluded that there existed
in the primordial Tao a divine basis for the development of the various
human orders. Some Han thinkers even argued that humans engaged in the
search for intrinsic categories can further or complete the cosmic
processes through their continual ordering and reordering of categories.
This helps to explain why categorical thinking and correlative thought
figure so largely in Chinese philosophical writings. [NYLAN, page 68]
Among modern translators, no consensus exists about the proper
definition of ming; the term is most often rendered as fate or Decree
(as in my own introductory remarks), but it is also translated as
variously as "duty," "destiny," "predestination," "causal connections
and their possibilities," "manifestation of Heaven's will," "the
inevitable," "empirical facts," "created world," "lifespan," "objective circumstances," "circumstances beyond human control," and so on. The
problem is not simply one of translation. Any Chinese of YANG HSIUNG'S
time would have found a bewildering array of usages for the term, some mutually contradictory. In part, the confusion stemmed from a typical
feature of Chinese classical philosophy, in which rival thinkers
consciously used the same terminology to articulate significantly
different ideas. But there were also unconscious adoptions of meanings through conceptual overlays and etymological extensions as the
so-called "Hundred Schools" of philosophy emerged from the earlier religious matrix.
THERE IS THE OBVIOUS CONSIDERATION ABOUT THE INNATE LACK (ie. IF YOU
KNEW MY WORK we'd know that you've put "schools" in QUOTATION MARKS TO INDICATE MY OWN DISTRUST of the attempt by many scholars to pigeonhole
the works of various thinkers into different "schools") OF ACADEMIC
INTEGRITY and is it any different to Samuele R. Bacchiocchi [29 January
1938 to 20 December 2008] getting doctoral thesis on "FROM SABBATH TO
SUNDAY" from the Pontifical Gregorian University?
Do we have to ask, whether such CONTEMPTUOUS NONCHALANCE (ie. perhaps
just my reply will be so pre-occupying much like throwing a dog a bone)
as reply a SUBSTANTIAL ENQUIRY is entirely due to your ACADEMIC COHORT
upon that issue being RAOUL BIRNBAUM, as to whether he is in any manner related PIERRE BIRNBAUM as visiting PROFESSOR OF JEWISH STUDIES AT
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY and therefore a proponent of NOACHIDE LAWS (in
CONTRA to COGITO #26 - ENDEAVOUR (WU) 𝌟務 = #477 - JUDGEMENT SENSIBILITY [#23, #48, #36, #81, #54] ENDORSED BY THE AMERICAN CONGRESS ON 13 APRIL
1992 AS 106 STATUTE 102 PUBLIC LAW 102-268 DESIGNATING 14 APRIL 1992 as EDUCATION AND SHARING DAY USA) for UNTOUCHABLE GOY FILTH reinforced by
recent ANTI-ZIONIST / TORAH JEWISH CONDUCT post 7 OCTOBER 2023 and their prohibitions on DISSEMINATING TORAH KNOWLEDGE as WORLDVIEW of IDOLATRY
in denial and its INEVITABLE NIHILISTIC CONSEQUENCE as we conveyed by
email on 1500 HOURS ON 10 FEBRUARY 2023, is the consideration of ROMAN
ERA political censure (a pious euphemism concerning death or crucifixion
for convenient opposition elimination [Acts 3:14, 26:21; Philippians
3:4-6] and more recently the WORLD JEWISH CONGRESS opened an OFFICE IN
THE VATICAN ON 19 OCTOBER 2023 in preparation for the GREATEST WHITEWASH
OF HUMAN HISTORY 1939-1945 as genocide not seen since JESUS OF NAZARETH
was linen wrapped and placed within a SEPULCHRE as COGITO #33 -
CLOSENESS (MI) - 𝌦密 = #484: 3 APRIL 33 CE [#49, #75, #62, #22, #22]
that the BIBLICAL NEW TESTAMENT record as a matter of survival, conveys
both obscured and dispersed commentary.
I CANNOT RECONCILE THE AMERICAN CONGRESS LAW ON MASQUERADING JEWISH
IDOLATRY WITH THE GOD ALMIGHTY BLASPHEMOUS SENILE AMERICAN IRISH
CATHOLIC PRESIDENT PRAYING A ROSARY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RELIGIOUS FALSEHOODS AND DICTUMS OF CATHOLIC CHRISTO FASCIST STATE:
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?male:226&feme:242&ontic:146&deme:71&idea:242>
#137 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #146 as [#30, #2, #50, #10, #5, #40] /
#1002 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #146 as [#300, #2, #700] = bên (H1121): {UMBRA: #52 % #41 = #11} 1) son, grandson, child, member of a group; 1a)
son, male child; 1b) grandson; 1c) children (pl. - male and female); 1d) youth, young men (pl.); 1e) young (of animals); 1f) sons (as characterisation, i.e. sons of injustice [for un- righteous men] or sons
of God [for angels]; 1g) *PEOPLE* (*OF* *A* *NATION*) (pl.); 1h) of
DOLF @ 1132 HOURS ON 10 FEBRUARY 2024: "I detect more slander by just
three lines as a guide for attaining the center of perfection.
No I'm a #983 - Philólogos (G5378): *LOVER* *OF* *THE* *WORD* = #33 - CLOSENESS (MI) + #48 - RITUAL (LI) + #902 (#451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY
x 2) - archḗ (G746): *FIRST* *PRINCIPLES* / Pharisaîos (G5330): *OPPOSITION* *TO* *ROMAN* / *CATHOLIC* *RULE* and the latter as JEWISH
of which the APOSTLE PAUL was a proponent, practices circumcision which
is a rejection of phallus or MARRIAGE / #1827 - EUCHARIST IDOLATROUS
WORSHIP, whilst being a Jewish / Gentile Christian I do not engage in
such #48 - RITUAL (LI) AS #6 - CONTRARIETY (LI) practices.
However on that question, I provide an opinion of some 58 pages which substantiates my sapient religious belief in conforming to that of the
JEWISH / GENTILE CHRISTIANS of that era.
Do cease your CHRISTO-FASCIST ANTI-SEMITISM for we will not cast what is sacred to the profane whether yourself or AFRICANS as JESUS JANGLERS
like KANYE WEST."
SEE ALSO: "INFORMAL RESEARCH NOTES ON JERUSALEM COUNCIL 50 CE CONFORMING
TO COGITO ARRAY AS IMAGO DEI WHICH BEING AN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IS NOT
THEN ANY PROVIDENCE OF THE PAPAL AUTHORITY / ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH"
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Notes%20on%20Jerusalem%20Council%2020240119.pdf>
MICHAEL [TIN MAN] CHRIST @ 1211 HRS ON 10 FEBRUARY 2024: "Nothing, you
detect nothing that does not centre itself on thy will be done.
A typical sinner Christian."
DOLF @ 1317 HOURS ON 10 FEBRUARY 2024: "Thy will be done?
Is that a MORAL, IMMORAL or an AMORAL will and can it be codified:
"MAKEST THY BOAST OF GOD, AND KNOWEST HIS WILL, AND APPROVEST THE THINGS
THAT ARE MORE EXCELLENT, BEING INSTRUCTED OUT OF THE LAW (ie. shǒu fǎ (守法): TO ABIDE BY THE LAW AS COGITO #57 - GUARDEDNESS (SHOU) - 𝌾守 = #508 / #40 - LAW / MODEL (FA) - 𝌭法 = #491) ..." [Romans 2:17-18]
Your reprobate response is irrational."
MICHAEL [TIN MAN] CHRIST @ 1607 HRS ON 10 FEBRUARY 2024: "Have it your
way."
EMAIL TO MICHAEL NYLAN (BERKELEY.EDU) @ 1500 HOURS ON 10 FEBRUARY 2024: "WHETHER THERE WAS CULTURAL EXCHANGE BETWEEN HAN DYNASTY CHINESE DAOIST SCHOOL OF THOUGHT / TORAH JUDAISM?
A consideration on whether there was a CULTURAL EXCHANGE between HAN
DYNASTY CHINESE DAOist school of thought / TORAH JUDAISM especially
given 104 BCE (ie. 103 if no zero year for 19 year metonic lunar cycle
or 293 x 365.2423 tropical year or 294 x 364 day / years) and the consideration of ROMAN ERA political censure (a euphemism concerning the crucifixion as convenient opposition elimination) conveys both obscured
and dispersed comments, such as for instance within the EPISTLE TO THE
ROMANS there is made a comment about indebtedness to the GREEKS and the BARBARIANS [Romans 1:14] but that the ORACLES OF GOD [Romans 3:2] are a special intellectual possession of the JEWS and yet by the MORAL
PROSCRIPTION on the CHINESE: 貪財 (tāncái) / 貪求 (tānqiú) we're able to
see equivalent FIRST PRINCIPLES despite a lack of any documented SEVEN
day cosmogony until later antiquity.
#608 as [#3, #200, #400, #5] = gûwr (H1481): {UMBRA: #209 % #41 = #4} 1)
to sojourn, abide, dwell in, dwell with, remain, inhabit, be a stranger,
be continuing, surely; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) *TO* *SOJOURN*, *DWELL* *FOR* *A* *TIME*; 1a2) to abide, stay, temporarily dwell; 1b) (Hithpolel); 1b1) to
seek hospitality with; 1b2) to assemble oneself; 1c) to stir up trouble, strife, quarrel, gather together; 1c1) (Qal); i) to stir up strife; ii)
to quarrel; 1c2) (Hithpolel) to excite oneself; 1d) to dread, fear,
stand in awe, be afraid; 1d1) (Qal); i) to fear, be afraid; ii) to be in
awe, stand in awe;
#608 as [#80, #1, #100, #5, #80, #10, #4, #8, #40, #70, #10, #200] = parepídēmos (G3927): {UMBRA: #598 % #41 = #24} 1) *ONE* *WHO* *COMES* *FROM* *A* *FOREIGN* *COUNTRY* *INTO* *A* *CITY* *OR* *LAND* *TO*
*RESIDE* *THERE* *BY* *THE* *SIDE* *OF* *THE* *NATIVES*; 2) a stranger;
3) sojourning in a strange place, a foreigner; 4) in the NT metaph. in reference to heaven as the native country, one who sojourns on earth;
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?idea:608>
The common teleological notion #608 - *SILK* would appear to imply such,
but when did it first occur and was it recursive at diverse times over centuries? The LUOSHU SQUARE is clearly a western philosophy
indebtedness to oriental thought and accordingly the BABYLONIAN "THE
GREAT MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH" ASSOCIATION is
then a question about viable FOUNDATIONS to the ROMAN STATE and its
WORLDVIEW (eg: RUSSIA only adopted the GREGORIAN CALENDAR upon 14
FEBRUARY 1918 pursuant to a Sovnarkom decree signed 24 JANUARY 1918
(Julian) by VLADIMIR LENIN) whether CATHOLIC, ISLAM or ORTHODOX being an artifice of obmutescence concerning a seething iniquitous maleficence as
its only claim to an exquisite piety which has no association with ours.
The only undoubted explicit reference of silk within the Bible occurs in [Revelation 18:12] where it is mentioned among the treasures of the
typical BABYLON.
#608 as [#200, #8, #100, #10, #20, #70, #200] = sērikós (G4596): {UMBRA: #608 % #41 = #34} 1) made of silk; 2) *SILK*, i.e. the fabric, silken garments;
According to accounts it is however, in the highest degree probable that
the texture was known to the Hebrews from the time that their commercial relations were extended by KING SOLOMON (reigned: 970-930 BCE).
MICHAEL NYLAN (BERKELEY.EDU) @ 0803 HOURS ON 11 FEBRUARY 2024: "WHETHER
THERE WAS CULTURAL EXCHANGE BETWEEN HAN DYNASTY CHINESE DAOIST SCHOOL OF THOUGHT / TORAH JUDAISM?
If you knew my work, you would know that there was no Daoist school of thought in the Han.
That there may have been cross-cultural borrowings goes without saying.
But the direction of borrowing is not always clear, nor can such
borrowings be proven,
since many ideas are independently developed in different cultures."
If I may state this very politely but nonetheless with great clarity, it
is a matter of concern to myself that in having engaged within urgent
labour in relation to the NEW YORK TERRORIST ATTACK dated 11 SEPTEMBER
2001 concerning its being a TRIPARTITE v's BIPARTITE NUMBER META LOGIC
issue as the possibility of it having an impetus as systemic BIPARTITE
NUMBER foundation of ISLAMIC BELIEF being consequential to a conformity
with REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM AS TABLE TALK IDEA #303 - 28 AUGUST 1942 which specifically relates to “NEW YORK SKY-SCRAPERS: THEIR VULNERABILITY TO
AIR ATTACK” which a perusal of your academic research appears to convey
by COGITO #45 - GREATNESS (TA) - 𝌲大 = #496 / [#23, #55, #54, #50, #35].
#568 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #182 as [#2, #40, #90, #30, #6, #400] = mᵉtsôwlâh (H4688): {UMBRA: #171 % #41 = #7} 1) *DEPTH*, the deep, the deep sea;
REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM AS IDEA #303 - 28 AUGUST 1942: "The *DEPTH* of the foundations of some sky-scrapers in New York is as much as seventy
metres, and the driving of the cement foundation demands a pressure of
six or eight thousand hundredweights. An air raid, such as those against London, would have a devastating effect on New York. It would be
physically impossible to clear the débris, and it is not possible to
build air-raid shelters.” [page 669]

<https://vcresearch.berkeley.edu/faculty/michael-nylan>
[MICHAEL NYLAN IS A PROFESSOR IN THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY, UNIVERSITY
OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY]
I quite accept your DISTINGUISHED scholarly opinion "IF YOU KNEW MY
WORK, YOU WOULD KNOW THAT THERE WAS NO DAOIST SCHOOL OF THOUGHT IN THE
HAN" as punctilious #65 - INNER (NEI) - 𝍆內 = #516 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY / [#25, #76, #47, #59, #57] custodian (ie. THE UNAVOIDABLE ANALOGY IS TO EITHER A *DUTIFUL* *CATHOLIC* *WIFE* *IN* *THE* *KITCHEN*
OR ONE WITH *POISON* *ON* *A* *COMFORT* *WOMAN'S* *LIPS* *IN* *THE* *FÜHRERBUNKER* BENEATH THE REICH CHANCELLERY GARDEN AND AS TO WHETHER IT INCLUDED ROSES REMAINS A FASCINATING PIECE OF ARCHITECTURAL AND
POLITICAL HISTORY OVER ANY CLANDESTINED CATHOLIC UBER ALLES MENTALITY
AND ANTI-SEMITISM) of early Chinese history from the fifth century BC to
the fifth century AD, with an emphasis on the sociopolitical context
such as myths and rituals, aesthetic theories and material culture,
belief: "No translation can ever hope to fully suggest the intricate
beauty of the original text by YANG HSIUNG. My hope is simply that this
study will revive interest in this important thinker. It is an
invitation to others to enter into the pleasures of HAN PHILOSOPHY.
[NYLAN, page xi]
YANG HSIUNG (53 B.C.A.D. 18) initially won fame under EMPEROR CH'ENG
(r. 33-7 B.C.) for long prose-poems (fu) whose satirical content was cloaked in lush imagery, hyperbole, and allusion. By the reign of
EMPEROR AI (r. 71 B.C.), however, YANG HSIUNG had redirected his considerable talents to the writing of two philosophical works, the FA
YEN (MODEL SAYINGS) and the T'AI HSÜAN CHING (CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY) ...
The initial difficulty, of course, lay in determining the exact
boundaries of each logical category, so that inferences were not
mistakenly drawn. Generations of Chinese scholars, first the early
Logicians and later the Han scholastics, devoted a great deal of time
and energy to this problem. Due to the occasional rift between logic and language, their first task was to establish formal rules of logic (ie.
ON 28 JANUARY 2024 WE RAISED WITH YOURSELF AN IMPORTANT ISSUE OF
VARIANCE TO THE META-DESCRIPTOR NOMENCLATURE, RETENTION OF AGENCY INTEROPERABILITY AND ITS SUITABLE REPRESENTATION OF FACULTY
REQUIREMENTS. FOR INSTANCE WE NOTE THAT THE FOLLOWING CAN BE NUANCED
AND THAT OUR PRIOR ASSUMPTIONS CONFORMED TO THE COGITO PREMISES OR
DIALECTIC TO A DEVISED NEURAL LINGUISTIC PRAGMA:
#52 - MEASURE --> CANON = kanṓn (G2583):
#68 - DIMMING --> RIGHTS
#71 - STOPPAGE --> WORLDVIEW
AND PROVIDED TO YOU THE PROPOSITION OF THE COGITO ARRAY AS THEN THE MEAN
FOR CONSCIOUSNESS AS IMAGO DEI) by which to discover the defining characteristics of each entity in the universe, so that essential
attributes could be clearly distinguished from accidental attributes...
While it was relatively simple to agree upon fundamental definitions for animals, shapes, and inanimate objects, the true definition of human
nature was a thornier problem, as it touched upon a host of problems
which stubbornly resisted solution by the logical method:
- What is the proper definition of human nature?
- What is the proper sphere and existential significance of human activity?
- What can humans reasonably hope to accomplish in this life?
In the Han Confucian synthesis, then, the proto-scientist's impulse
towards categorization and the logician's search for orderly expression joined forces with the ethical concerns of the traditional scholar. Categorical thinking, inherently preoccupied with the relation of
macrocosm to microcosm, came to be applied to many areas of inquiry,
most significantly (1) portent theory; (2) the rectification of names;
and (3) point-by-point analogies between the human body, the body politic, and the universe. We are familiar enough with body analogies;
we often talk of "heads of state," for example. Portent theory and the rectification of names, however, may need some explanation for the
modern reader. {NYLAN, page 67]
The impact of YANG HSIUNG'S PHILOSOPHY on later Chinese thought is undeniable. The historian PAN KU (32-92 CE) revered YANG HSIUNG as one
of the THREE GREAT CONFUCIAN PHILOSOPHERS OF WESTERN HAN, in company
with LIU HSIANG and LIU HSIN. PAN KU'S opinion was shared by the leading Eastern Han thinkers, including HUAN T'AN, WANG CH'UNG, CHANG HENG, YING SHAO, and Sung Chung, all of whom appreciated the breadth and critical
acumen of YANG HSIUNG'S writings. Through them, the T'AI HSÜAN provided inspiration and vocabulary for the HSÜAN HSÜEH movement (in Chinese, "Mystery Learning") of the post-Han period. The Mystery, in fact,
continued to greatly influence Chinese thought for a millennium, until prominent SUNG thinkers like SU HSÜN (1009-1066) and CHU HSI
(1130-1200) applied contemporary standards retroactively to YANG
HSIUNG, thereby discrediting him on three counts:
(a) his service at the court of the "usurper" WANG MANG (r. 923);
(b) his outright rejection of the theory of human nature proposed by the Confucian master Mencius (c. 371-289); and
(c) his supposed presumption in composing ''classics" in imitation of
the sages. [NYLAN, pages 1, 2]
Of course, YANG HSIUNG could claim to be emulating the model of
Confucius, who "seldom spoke of ming," presumably because the most
sacred aspects of human existence are taboo. But it is no less likely
that YANG'S reticence is meant to entice the reader to embark upon that step-by-step immersion in the sage-author's mind that SCHOOLS THE READER IN THE MORAL PROCESS ITSELF.
MICHAEL NYLAN (BERKELEY.EDU) @ 0418 HOURS ON 12 FEBRUARY 2024: "Sorry,
I, too, participated in Sept. 11.
Your aggressiveness does not mean that I need to continue the
conversation."
YOUTUBE: "EYE OF THE NEEDLE (SIA)"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1kg0EdD7tzE>
"AND YOU'RE LOCKED INSIDE MY HEART
AND YOUR MELODY'S AN ART
AND I WON'T LET THE TERROR IN
I'M STEALING TIME THROUGH THE EYE (#6000 [146,097 days] % 22 = 13
SEPTEMBER 2001) OF THE NEEDLE"
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?male:223&feme:157&ontic:157&deme:249&lexicon:H3826,H6030,H4172,H2166,H5869>
{@4: Sup: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#223); Ego: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#157 - I
AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR
MY OWN PROPERTY {%41})}
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #157
DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #249
DOLF @ 0859 HOURS ON 12 FEBRUARY 2024: "As you'd know: "TIME IS WHAT
CANNOT BE OVERCOME" since it has DOMINION over every person.
#295 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 11 FEBRUARY 2024 as [#20, #200, #60, #10, #5] = korçêʼ (H3764): {UMBRA: #281 % #41 = #35} 1) *THRONE*, royal chair;
But I can both TIME / NOUMENON RESONANCE as MIND / SOUL with the whole
kit and caboodle.
Do understand that I am writing from a different time zone for a
particular audience who culturally have a disregard for women and
therefore you ought not to convey any contempt and neither am I
interested in original sin discourse upon empathy as a product of a
Catholic institutional eduction."
In case you were wondering such feasibility of a temporal heuristic with noumenon referencing (ie. irrespective of any temporal relativity as
axis mundi) was our work in progress and calibration point #0 -
WEDNESDAY 20 MARCH 1996 / NEW MOON 21 MARCH 1996 + 5 x #364 + #182 = 12 SEPTEMBER 2001 response to the World Trade Centre Terrorist Event.
#1091 - FEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #281 as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #3, #5, #50,
#800, #40, #1, #10] = paragínomai (G3854): {UMBRA: #366 % #41 = #38} 1)
to be present, to come near, approach; 2) *TO* *COME* *FORTH*, *MAKE*
*ONE'S* *PUBLIC* *APPEARANCE*;
YOUTUBE: "9/11: AS EVENTS UNFOLD" (Uploaded: 11 SEPTEMBER 2018)
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEogeIIOJzU>

#1010 - FEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #281 as [#30, #40, #300, #40, #200, #400] = mishmereth (H4931): {UMBRA: #980 % #41 = #37} 1) *GUARD*, *CHARGE*, *FUNCTION*, *OBLIGATION*, *SERVICE*, *WATCH*; 1a) guard, watch, house of detention or confinement; 1b) keeping, preserving; 1c) charge,
injunction; 1d) office, function (ceremonial);
#1091 - FEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #281 as [#20, #100, #1, #300, #70, #400,
#200] = krátos (G2904): {UMBRA: #691 % #41 = #35} 1) force, strength; 2) power, might: mighty with great power; 2a) a mighty deed, a work of
power; 3) *DOMINION*;
PHONE CALL @ 0947 HRS ON 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 GIVES GRAPPLE (354, 281)@[11,
28, 59, 38, 9, 48, 31, 56, 1] PROTOTYPE
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?date:2001.9.11&time:9.47&heuristic>
@9: Sup: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#354); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#281)}
TELOS TOTAL: #281 as [#30, #200, #1, #10, #40] = râʼâh (H7200): {UMBRA: #206 % #41 = #1} 1) to see, look at, inspect, perceive, consider; 1a)
(Qal); 1a1) to see; 1a2) to see, perceive; 1a3) to see, have vision;
1a4) to look at, see, regard, look after, see after, learn about,
observe, watch, look upon, look out, find out; 1a5) to see, observe, consider, look at, give attention to, discern, distinguish; 1a6) to look
at, gaze at; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to appear, present oneself; 1b2) to be
seen; 1b3) to be visible; 1c) (Pual) to be seen; 1d) (Hiphil); 1d1) to
cause to see, show; 1d2) to cause to look intently at, behold, cause to
gaze at; 1e) (Hophal); 1e1) to be caused to see, be shown; 1e2) to be exhibited to; 1f) (Hithpael) *TO* *LOOK* *AT* *EACH* *OTHER*, *FACE*;
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #186
DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #487
PHONE CALL: "HI *BABY* I'M... *BABY* YOU HAVE TO *LISTEN* TO ME...
CAREFULLY, I'M ON A PLANE THAT'S BEEN HIJACKED. I'M ON THE PLANE, I'M *CALLING* FROM THE PLANE. I WANNA *TELL* YOU THAT I *LOVE* YOU. PLEASE *TELL* MY *CHILDREN* THAT I *LOVE* THEM VERY MUCH, AND I'M SO *SORRY*
*BABE*. I *HOPE* TO BE ABLE TO *SEE* *YOUR* *FACE* AGAIN *BABY*. I
*LOVE* YOU *BABY*. I *LOVE* YOU. GOODBYE."
#287 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #186 as [#2, #70, #200, #10, #5] /
#327 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #186 as [#2, #70, #200, #10, #5, #40] =
ʻîyr (H5892): {UMBRA: #280 % #41 = #34} 1) excitement, anguish; 1a) of *TERROR*; 2) city, town (a place of waking, guarded); 2a) city, town;
#686 - FEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #281 as [#5, #50, #1, #50, #300, #10, #70,
#200] = enantíos (G1727): {UMBRA: #686 % #41 = #30} 1) over against, opposite; 1a) of place, opposite, contrary (of the wind); 2) metaphor;
2a) *OPPOSED* *AS* *AN* *ADVERSARY*, *HOSTILE*, *ANTAGONISTIC* *IN*
*FEELING* *OR* *ACT*; 2b) an opponent;
#605 - FEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #281 as [#5, #80, #10, #2, #70, #400, #30,
#8] = epiboulḗ (G1917): {UMBRA: #605 % #41 = #31} 1) *A* *PLAN* *FORMED* *AGAINST* *ONE*, *A* *PLOT*;
#51 #25 #74
#73 #50 #27
#26 #75 #49
[TORAH PROTOTYPE (ON BACKS OF JEWS) #NINE DEFAULT QUANTUM: #231 ... #379
... #693 / NATURAL PROGRESSION: #150 ... #277 ... #450 = #YOD (#10) - 10 SEPTEMBER 2001 ... #MEM (#40) ... #TAU (#400)]
#75 - SOLVING THE RELIGIOUS PROBLEM
#126 - VOX IN EXCELSO ("A VOICE FROM ON HIGH")
#153 - FIGHT AGAINST FALSEHOOD, SUPERSTITION AND INTOLERANCE: SCIENCE IS
NOT DOGMATIC
#227 - DANCERS ON THE MEMORY OF GREAT MEN
#277 - SOLDIER HAS A BOUNDLESS AFFECTION
#303 - SKY-SCRAPERS: THEIR VULNERABILITY TO AIR ATTACK
#376 - CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE (FORMULA OF AUTONOMY: #0, )
#425 - ONTIC PREMISE IN ACCORDANCE WITH QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS
#450 - TERRORIST vEVENT RESPONSE: #YOD (#10) + #MEM (#40) + #TAU (#400)
+ #ALEPH (#1) AS PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY SPECTRUM / TEMPORAL HEURISTIC FOR CONSCIOUSNESS INSTANTIATION
FORMULA OF UNIVERSAL LAW: #897 as [#6, #40, #400, #5, #40, #6, #400] /
#451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY SPECTRUM (#452 … #532) as [#400, #5, #6,
#40] = tᵉhôwm (H8415): {UMBRA: #451 % #41 = #41} 1) deep, depths, deep places, abyss, the deep, sea; 1a) deep (of subterranean waters); 1b)
*DEEP*, *SEA*, *ABYSSES* (*OF* *SEA*); 1c) primeval ocean, deep; 1d)
deep, depth (of river); 1e) *ABYSS*, *THE* *GRAVE*;
FORMULA OF HUMANITY: + #17 - HOLDING BACK (JUAN) = #914 as [#400, #6,
#70, #2, #6, #400, #10, #20] /
#483 = TETRA: #32 - LEGION (CHUNG) as [#400, #6, #70, #2, #5] = tôwʻêbah (H8441): {UMBRA: #483 % #41 = #32} 1) a disgusting thing, abomination, abominable; 1a) in ritual sense (of unclean food, idols, mixed
marriages); 1b) *IN* *ETHICAL* *SENSE* (*OF* *WICKEDNESS* etc);
FORMULA OF AUTONOMY: + #41 - RESPONSE (YING) = #938 as [#2, #300, #30,
#6, #600] /
#376 as [#300, #30, #6, #40] /
#462 = TETRA: #11 - DIVERGENCE (CH’A) as [#6, #30, #300, #30, #6, #40,
#10, #40] = shâlôwm (H7965): {UMBRA: #376 % #41 = #7} 1) completeness, soundness, welfare, peace; 1a) completeness (in number); 1b) safety, soundness (in body); 1c) *WELFARE*, *HEALTH*, *PROSPERITY*; 1d) peace,
quiet, tranquillity, contentment; 1e) peace, friendship; 1e1) of human relationships; 1e2) with God especially in covenant relationship; 1f)
*PEACE* (*FROM* *WAR*); 1g) peace (as adjective);
#938 as [#8, #300, #300, #8, #9, #8, #300, #5] = hēttáō (G2274): {UMBRA: #1409 % #41 = #15} 1) to make less, inferior, to overcome; 1a) to be
made inferior; 1b) to overcome, worsted, *TO* *BE* *CONQUERED* *BY*
*ONE*, *FORCED* *TO* *YIELD* *TO* *ONE*; 1c) to hold a thing inferior,
set below;
FORMULA OF PROGRESSION: + #65 - INNER (NEI: *TENET*) = #962 as [#400,
#6, #200, #10, #300, #40, #6] /
#510 = TETRA: #59 - MASSING (CHU) as [#10, #200, #300] /
#551 - SECTION III OF LETTERS PATENT as [#30, #5, #6, #200, #10, #300] = yârash (H3423): {UMBRA: #510 % #41 = #18} 1) to seize, dispossess, take possession off, inherit, disinherit, occupy, impoverish, be an heir; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) *TO* *TAKE* *POSSESSION* *OF*; 1a2) to inherit; 1a3) to impoverish, come to poverty, be poor; 1b) (Niphal) to be dispossessed,
be impoverished, come to poverty; 1c) (Piel) to devour; 1d) (Hiphil);
1d1) *TO* *CAUSE* *TO* *POSSESS* *OR* *INHERIT*; 1d2) *TO* *CAUSE*
*OTHERS* *TO* *POSSESS* *OR* *INHERIT*; 1d3) to impoverish; 1d4) to dispossess; 1d5) to destroy, bring to ruin, disinherit;
#962 as [#9, #5, #70, #300, #8, #300, #70, #200] = theótēs (G2320):
{UMBRA: #592 % #41 = #18} 1) deity; 1a) the state of being God, *GODHEAD*;
DISCRIMINATING NORM: + #57 - GUARDEDNESS (SHOU) = #954 as [#40, #8, #6,
#900] /
#522 = TETRA: #71 - STOPPAGE (CHIH) as [#2, #8, #6, #90, #400, #10, #6]
= chûwts (H2351): {UMBRA: #104 % #41 = #22} 1) outside, outward,
*STREET*, the outside;
#954 as [#80, #1, #300, #70, #400, #40, #5, #50, #8] = patéō (G3961): {UMBRA: #1186 % #41 = #38} 1) to tread; 1a) to trample, crush with the
feet; 1b) to advance by setting foot upon, tread upon: *TO* *ENCOUNTER* *SUCCESSFULLY* *THE* *GREATEST* *PERILS* *FROM* *THE* *MACHINATIONS*
*AND* *PERSECUTIONS* *WITH* *WHICH* *SATAN* *WOULD* *FAIN* *THWART*
*THE* *PREACHING* *OF* *THE* *GOSPEL*; 1c) to tread under foot, trample
on, i.e. to treat with insult and contempt: to desecrate the holy city
by devastation and outrage;
#425 as [#4, #70, #50, #300, #1] = dídōmi (G1325): {UMBRA: #868 % #41 =
#7} 1) to give; 2) to give something to someone; 2a) of one's own accord
to give one something, to his advantage; 2a1) to bestow a gift; 2b) to
grant, give to one asking, let have; 2c) to supply, furnish, necessary things; 2d) to give over, deliver; 2d1) to reach out, extend, present;
2d2) of a writing; 2d3) to give over to one's care, intrust, commit; i) something to be administered; ii) *TO* *GIVE* *OR* *COMMIT* *TO* *SOME*
*ONE* *SOMETHING* *TO* *BE* *RELIGIOUSLY* *OBSERVED*; 2d4) to give what
is due or obligatory, to pay: wages or reward; 2d5) to furnish, endue;
2e) to give; 2e1) to cause, profuse, give forth from one's self; i) to
give, hand out lots; 2e2) to appoint to an office; 2e3) to cause to come forth, i.e. as the sea, death and Hell are said to give up the dead who
have been engulfed or received by them; 2e4) to give one to someone as
his own; i) as an object of his saving care; ii) to give one to someone,
to follow him as a leader and master; iii) to give one to someone to
care for his interests; iv) *TO* *GIVE* *ONE* *TO* *SOMEONE* *TO* *WHOM*
*HE* *ALREADY* *BELONGED*, *TO* *RETURN*; 2e5) to grant or permit one;
i) to commission;
PRE-EMPTIVE *CAMEL* ACTION @ 0820 HRS ON 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 GIVES GRAPPLE (328, 425)@[81, 32, 73, 20, 43, 44, 65, 3, 64] PROTOTYPE
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?date:2001.9.11&time:8.20&heuristic&male:328&feme:425&ontic:367&deme:722&idea:425>
{@9: Sup: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#328); Ego: 64 - SINKING: CH'EN (#425)}
TELOS TOTAL: #425 as [#1, #10, #50, #10, #3, #40, #1, #300, #10] =
aínigma (G135): {UMBRA: #115 % #41 = #33} 1) an *OBSCURE* *SAYING*,
enigma, riddle; 2) an obscure thing;
#827 - MALE CHECKSUM TOTAL: #328 as [#400, #400, #3, #6, #4, #4, #10] = gâdad (H1413): {UMBRA: #11 % #41 = #11} 1) *TO* *PENETRATE*, *CUT*, *ATTACK*, *INVADE*; 1a) (Qal) to penetrate, cut into; 1b) (Hithpoel);
1b1) to cut oneself; 1b2) to gather in troops or crowds;
#1721 - FEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #425 as [#20, #70, #200, #40, #70, #20,
#100, #1, #300, #800, #100] = kosmokrátōr (G2888): {UMBRA: #1721 % #41 = #40} 1) *LORD* *OF* *THE* *WORLD*, *PRINCE* *OF* *THIS* *AGE*; 1a) the
devil and his demons;
#691 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #367 as [#6, #2, #3, #40, #30, #10, #600] = gâmâl (H1581): {UMBRA: #73 % #41 = #32} 1) *CAMEL*; 1a) as property, as beast of burden, for riding, forbidden for food;
#341 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #722 as [#200, #80, #1, #50, #10] = râphâʼ (H7495): {UMBRA: #281 % #41 = #35} 1) to heal, make healthful; 1a) (Qal)
to heal; 1a1) of God; 1a2) healer, physician (of men); 1a3) *OF* *HURTS*
*OF* *NATIONS* *INVOLVING* *RESTORED* *FAVOUR* (fig); 1a4) of individual distresses (fig); 1b) (Niphal) to be healed; 1b1) literal (of persons);
1b2) of water, pottery; 1b3) of national hurts (fig); 1b4) of personal distress (fig); 1c) (Piel) to heal; 1c1) literal; 1c2) of national
defects or hurts (fig); 1d) (Hithpael) in order to get healed (infinitive);
------------
#443 - FEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #281 as [#5, #60, #5, #80, #30, #1, #3, #8,
#200, #1, #50] = ekplḗssō (G1605): {UMBRA: #1343 % #41 = #31} 1) to
strike out, expel by a blow, drive out or away; 2) to cast off by a
blow, to drive out; 2a) commonly, to strike one out of self-possession,
to strike with panic, shock, astonish; 3) *TO* *BE* *STRUCK* *WITH* *AMAZEMENT*, *ASTONISHED*, *AMAZED*;
#871 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #487 as [#6, #400, #300, #40, #70, #50, #5]
= shâmaʻ (H8085): {UMBRA: #410 % #41 = #41} 1) *TO* *HEAR*, *LISTEN*
*TO*, *OBEY*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to hear (perceive by ear); 1a2) to hear of
or concerning; 1a3) to hear (have power to hear); 1a4) to hear with
attention or interest, listen to; 1a5) to understand (language); 1a6) to
hear (of judicial cases); 1a7) to listen, give heed; i) to consent,
agree; ii) to grant request; 1a8) to listen to, yield to; 1a9) to obey,
be obedient; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be heard (of voice or sound); 1b2) to
be heard of; 1b3) to be regarded, be obeyed; 1c) (Piel) to cause to
hear, call to hear, summon; 1d) (Hiphil); 1d1) to cause to hear, *TELL*, proclaim, utter a sound; 1d2) to sound aloud (musical term); 1d3) to
make proclamation, summon; 1d4) to cause to be heard; 1e) sound;
#1091 - FEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #281 as [#6, #20, #80, #300, #70, #10, #5,
#600] = peshaʻ (H6588): {UMBRA: #450 % #41 = #40} 1) transgression, rebellion; 1a) *TRANSGRESSION* (*AGAINST* *INDIVIDUALS*); 1b)
*TRANSGRESSION* (*NATION* *AGAINST* *NATION*); 1c) *TRANSGRESSION*
(*AGAINST* *GOD*); 1c1) in general; 1c2) as recognised by sinner; 1c3)
as God deals with it; 1c4) as God forgives; 1d) guilt of transgression;
1e) punishment for transgression; 1f) offering for transgression;
#374 - MALE CHECKSUM TOTAL: #354 as [#300, #6, #2, #10, #50, #6] =
shâbâh (H7617): {UMBRA: #307 % #41 = #20} 1) *TO* *TAKE* *CAPTIVE*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to take captive; 1a2) captive (participle); 1a3) to lead
captive; 1b) (Niphal) to be taken captive;
#183 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #186 as [#7, #70, #100, #6] = zâʻaq
(H2199): {UMBRA: #177 % #41 = #13} 1) *TO* *CRY*, *CRY* *OUT*, *CALL*,
*CALL* *FOR* *HELP*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to call (to one's aid); 1a2) to
cry, cry out (in need); 1b) (Niphal) to be assembled, be called
together, be joined together; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to call, call out, call together, summon; 1c2) to make a crying, proclaim; 1c3) to have a proclamation made; 1c4) to call out to, call out at;
#554 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #186 as [#400, #50, #8, #40, #50, #6] =
nâcham (H5162): {UMBRA: #98 % #41 = #16} 1) *TO* *BE* *SORRY*, *CONSOLE* *ONESELF*, *REPENT*, *REGRET*, *COMFORT*, *BE* *COMFORTED*; 1a)
(Niphal); 1a1) to be sorry, be moved to pity, have compassion; 1a2) to
be sorry, rue, suffer grief, repent; 1a3) to comfort oneself, be
comforted; 1a4) to comfort oneself, ease oneself; 1b) (Piel) to comfort, console; 1c) (Pual) to be comforted, be consoled; 1d) (Hithpael); 1d1)
to be sorry, have compassion; 1d2) to rue, repent of; 1d3) to comfort oneself, be comforted; 1d4) to ease oneself;
#1181 - MALE CHECKSUM TOTAL: #354 as [#80, #100, #70, #5, #30, #80, #9,
#7, #800] = proelpízō (G4276): {UMBRA: #1182 % #41 = #34} 1) to *HOPE* before;
#186 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #186 as [#6, #40, #80, #50, #10] /
#206 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #186 as [#6, #40, #80, #50, #10, #20] =
pânîym (H6440): {UMBRA: #180 % #41 = #16} 1) *FACE*; 1a) face, faces;
1b) presence, person; 1c) face (of seraphim or cherubim); 1d) face (of animals); 1e) face, surface (of ground); 1f) as adv of loc/temp; 1f1)
before and behind, toward, in front of, forward, formerly, from
beforetime, before; 1g) with prep; 1g1) in front of, before, to the
front of, in the presence of, in the face of, at the face or front of,
from the presence of, from before, from before the face of;
#102 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #186 as [#30, #2, #50, #20] = bên (H1121): {UMBRA: #52 % #41 = #11} 1) son, grandson, child, member of a group; 1a)
son, male child; 1b) grandson; 1c) *CHILDREN* (pl. - male and female);
1d) youth, young men (pl.); 1e) young (of animals); 1f) sons (as characterisation, i.e. sons of injustice [for un- righteous men] or sons
of God [for angels]; 1g) people (of a nation) (pl.); 1h) of lifeless
things, i.e. sparks, stars, arrows (fig.); 1i) a member of a guild,
order, class;
#616 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #186 as [#40, #10, #50, #10, #100, #6,
#400] = yânaq (H3243): {UMBRA: #160 % #41 = #37} 1) to suckle, nurse,
suck; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to suck; 1a2) suckling, *BABE* (subst); 1b)
(Hiphil); 1b1) to give suck to, nurse; 1b2) nursing, nursing woman,
nurse (participle);
#599 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #186 as [#1, #3, #1, #80, #8, #200, #1,
#300, #5] = agapáō (G25): {UMBRA: #886 % #41 = #25} 1) of persons; 1a)
to welcome, to entertain, to be fond of, *TO* *LOVE* *DEARLY*; 2) of
things; 2a) to be well pleased, to be contented at or with a thing;
#1172 - FEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #281 as [#6, #30, #40, #6, #80, #400, #10,
#600] = môwphêth (H4159): {UMBRA: #526 % #41 = #34} 1) wonder, sign, miracle, portent; 1a) *WONDER* (*AS* *A* *SPECIAL* *DISPLAY* *OF*
*GOD'S* *POWER*); 1b) sign, token (of future event);
#1415 - FEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #281 as [#1, #500, #10, #30, #1, #100, #3,
MICHAEL NYLAN (BERKELEY.EDU) @ 0418 HOURS ON 12 FEBRUARY 2024: "Sorry,
I, too, participated in Sept. 11.
Your aggressiveness does not mean that I need to continue the
conversation."
YOUTUBE: "EYE OF THE NEEDLE (SIA)"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1kg0EdD7tzE>
"AND YOU'RE LOCKED INSIDE MY HEART
AND YOUR MELODY'S AN ART
AND I WON'T LET THE TERROR IN
I'M STEALING TIME THROUGH THE EYE (#6000 [146,097 days] % 22 = 13
SEPTEMBER 2001) OF THE NEEDLE"
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?male:223&feme:157&ontic:157&deme:249&lexicon:H3826,H6030,H4172,H2166,H5869>
{@4: Sup: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#223); Ego: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#157 - I
AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR
MY OWN PROPERTY {%41})}
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #157
DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #249
DOLF @ 0859 HOURS ON 12 FEBRUARY 2024: "As you'd know: "TIME IS WHAT
CANNOT BE OVERCOME" since it has DOMINION over every person.
#295 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 11 FEBRUARY 2024 as [#20, #200, #60, #10, #5] = korçêʼ (H3764): {UMBRA: #281 % #41 = #35} 1) *THRONE*, royal chair;
But I can both TIME / NOUMENON RESONANCE as MIND / SOUL with the whole
kit and caboodle.
Do understand that I am writing from a different time zone for a
particular audience who culturally have a disregard for women and
therefore you ought not to convey any contempt and neither am I
interested in original sin discourse upon empathy as a product of a
Catholic institutional eduction."
In case you were wondering such feasibility of a temporal heuristic with noumenon referencing (ie. irrespective of any temporal relativity as
axis mundi) was our work in progress and calibration point #0 -
WEDNESDAY 20 MARCH 1996 / NEW MOON 21 MARCH 1996 + 5 x #364 + #182 = 12 SEPTEMBER 2001 response to the World Trade Centre Terrorist Event.
#1091 - FEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #281 as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #3, #5, #50,
#800, #40, #1, #10] = paragínomai (G3854): {UMBRA: #366 % #41 = #38} 1)
to be present, to come near, approach; 2) *TO* *COME* *FORTH*, *MAKE*
*ONE'S* *PUBLIC* *APPEARANCE*;
YOUTUBE: "9/11: AS EVENTS UNFOLD" (Uploaded: 11 SEPTEMBER 2018)
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEogeIIOJzU>

#1010 - FEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #281 as [#30, #40, #300, #40, #200, #400] = mishmereth (H4931): {UMBRA: #980 % #41 = #37} 1) *GUARD*, *CHARGE*, *FUNCTION*, *OBLIGATION*, *SERVICE*, *WATCH*; 1a) guard, watch, house of detention or confinement; 1b) keeping, preserving; 1c) charge,
injunction; 1d) office, function (ceremonial);
#1091 - FEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #281 as [#20, #100, #1, #300, #70, #400,
#200] = krátos (G2904): {UMBRA: #691 % #41 = #35} 1) force, strength; 2) power, might: mighty with great power; 2a) a mighty deed, a work of
power; 3) *DOMINION*;
PHONE CALL @ 0947 HRS ON 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 GIVES GRAPPLE (354, 281)@[11,
28, 59, 38, 9, 48, 31, 56, 1] PROTOTYPE
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?date:2001.9.11&time:9.47&heuristic>
@9: Sup: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#354); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#281)}
TELOS TOTAL: #281 as [#30, #200, #1, #10, #40] = râʼâh (H7200): {UMBRA: #206 % #41 = #1} 1) to see, look at, inspect, perceive, consider; 1a)
(Qal); 1a1) to see; 1a2) to see, perceive; 1a3) to see, have vision;
1a4) to look at, see, regard, look after, see after, learn about,
observe, watch, look upon, look out, find out; 1a5) to see, observe, consider, look at, give attention to, discern, distinguish; 1a6) to look
at, gaze at; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to appear, present oneself; 1b2) to be
seen; 1b3) to be visible; 1c) (Pual) to be seen; 1d) (Hiphil); 1d1) to
cause to see, show; 1d2) to cause to look intently at, behold, cause to
gaze at; 1e) (Hophal); 1e1) to be caused to see, be shown; 1e2) to be exhibited to; 1f) (Hithpael) *TO* *LOOK* *AT* *EACH* *OTHER*, *FACE*;
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #186
DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #487
PHONE CALL: "HI *BABY* I'M... *BABY* YOU HAVE TO *LISTEN* TO ME...
CAREFULLY, I'M ON A PLANE THAT'S BEEN HIJACKED. I'M ON THE PLANE, I'M *CALLING* FROM THE PLANE. I WANNA *TELL* YOU THAT I *LOVE* YOU. PLEASE *TELL* MY *CHILDREN* THAT I *LOVE* THEM VERY MUCH, AND I'M SO *SORRY*
*BABE*. I *HOPE* TO BE ABLE TO *SEE* *YOUR* *FACE* AGAIN *BABY*. I
*LOVE* YOU *BABY*. I *LOVE* YOU. GOODBYE."
#287 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #186 as [#2, #70, #200, #10, #5] /
#327 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #186 as [#2, #70, #200, #10, #5, #40] =
ʻîyr (H5892): {UMBRA: #280 % #41 = #34} 1) excitement, anguish; 1a) of *TERROR*; 2) city, town (a place of waking, guarded); 2a) city, town;
#686 - FEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #281 as [#5, #50, #1, #50, #300, #10, #70,
#200] = enantíos (G1727): {UMBRA: #686 % #41 = #30} 1) over against, opposite; 1a) of place, opposite, contrary (of the wind); 2) metaphor;
2a) *OPPOSED* *AS* *AN* *ADVERSARY*, *HOSTILE*, *ANTAGONISTIC* *IN*
*FEELING* *OR* *ACT*; 2b) an opponent;
#605 - FEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #281 as [#5, #80, #10, #2, #70, #400, #30,
#8] = epiboulḗ (G1917): {UMBRA: #605 % #41 = #31} 1) *A* *PLAN* *FORMED* *AGAINST* *ONE*, *A* *PLOT*;
#51 #25 #74
#73 #50 #27
#26 #75 #49
[TORAH PROTOTYPE (ON BACKS OF JEWS) #NINE DEFAULT QUANTUM: #231 ... #379
... #693 / NATURAL PROGRESSION: #150 ... #277 ... #450 = #YOD (#10) - 10 SEPTEMBER 2001 ... #MEM (#40) ... #TAU (#400)]
#75 - SOLVING THE RELIGIOUS PROBLEM
#126 - VOX IN EXCELSO ("A VOICE FROM ON HIGH")
#153 - FIGHT AGAINST FALSEHOOD, SUPERSTITION AND INTOLERANCE: SCIENCE IS
NOT DOGMATIC
#227 - DANCERS ON THE MEMORY OF GREAT MEN
#277 - SOLDIER HAS A BOUNDLESS AFFECTION
#303 - SKY-SCRAPERS: THEIR VULNERABILITY TO AIR ATTACK
#376 - CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE (FORMULA OF AUTONOMY: #0, )
#425 - ONTIC PREMISE IN ACCORDANCE WITH QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS
#450 - TERRORIST vEVENT RESPONSE: #YOD (#10) + #MEM (#40) + #TAU (#400)
+ #ALEPH (#1) AS PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY SPECTRUM / TEMPORAL HEURISTIC FOR CONSCIOUSNESS INSTANTIATION
FORMULA OF UNIVERSAL LAW: #897 as [#6, #40, #400, #5, #40, #6, #400] /
#451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY SPECTRUM (#452 … #532) as [#400, #5, #6,
#40] = tᵉhôwm (H8415): {UMBRA: #451 % #41 = #41} 1) deep, depths, deep places, abyss, the deep, sea; 1a) deep (of subterranean waters); 1b)
*DEEP*, *SEA*, *ABYSSES* (*OF* *SEA*); 1c) primeval ocean, deep; 1d)
deep, depth (of river); 1e) *ABYSS*, *THE* *GRAVE*;
FORMULA OF HUMANITY: + #17 - HOLDING BACK (JUAN) = #914 as [#400, #6,
#70, #2, #6, #400, #10, #20] /
#483 = TETRA: #32 - LEGION (CHUNG) as [#400, #6, #70, #2, #5] = tôwʻêbah (H8441): {UMBRA: #483 % #41 = #32} 1) a disgusting thing, abomination, abominable; 1a) in ritual sense (of unclean food, idols, mixed
marriages); 1b) *IN* *ETHICAL* *SENSE* (*OF* *WICKEDNESS* etc);
FORMULA OF AUTONOMY: + #41 - RESPONSE (YING) = #938 as [#2, #300, #30,
#6, #600] /
#376 as [#300, #30, #6, #40] /
#462 = TETRA: #11 - DIVERGENCE (CH’A) as [#6, #30, #300, #30, #6, #40,
#10, #40] = shâlôwm (H7965): {UMBRA: #376 % #41 = #7} 1) completeness, soundness, welfare, peace; 1a) completeness (in number); 1b) safety, soundness (in body); 1c) *WELFARE*, *HEALTH*, *PROSPERITY*; 1d) peace,
quiet, tranquillity, contentment; 1e) peace, friendship; 1e1) of human relationships; 1e2) with God especially in covenant relationship; 1f)
*PEACE* (*FROM* *WAR*); 1g) peace (as adjective);
#938 as [#8, #300, #300, #8, #9, #8, #300, #5] = hēttáō (G2274): {UMBRA: #1409 % #41 = #15} 1) to make less, inferior, to overcome; 1a) to be
made inferior; 1b) to overcome, worsted, *TO* *BE* *CONQUERED* *BY*
*ONE*, *FORCED* *TO* *YIELD* *TO* *ONE*; 1c) to hold a thing inferior,
set below;
FORMULA OF PROGRESSION: + #65 - INNER (NEI: *TENET*) = #962 as [#400,
#6, #200, #10, #300, #40, #6] /
#510 = TETRA: #59 - MASSING (CHU) as [#10, #200, #300] /
#551 - SECTION III OF LETTERS PATENT as [#30, #5, #6, #200, #10, #300] = yârash (H3423): {UMBRA: #510 % #41 = #18} 1) to seize, dispossess, take possession off, inherit, disinherit, occupy, impoverish, be an heir; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) *TO* *TAKE* *POSSESSION* *OF*; 1a2) to inherit; 1a3) to impoverish, come to poverty, be poor; 1b) (Niphal) to be dispossessed,
be impoverished, come to poverty; 1c) (Piel) to devour; 1d) (Hiphil);
1d1) *TO* *CAUSE* *TO* *POSSESS* *OR* *INHERIT*; 1d2) *TO* *CAUSE*
*OTHERS* *TO* *POSSESS* *OR* *INHERIT*; 1d3) to impoverish; 1d4) to dispossess; 1d5) to destroy, bring to ruin, disinherit;
#962 as [#9, #5, #70, #300, #8, #300, #70, #200] = theótēs (G2320):
{UMBRA: #592 % #41 = #18} 1) deity; 1a) the state of being God, *GODHEAD*;
DISCRIMINATING NORM: + #57 - GUARDEDNESS (SHOU) = #954 as [#40, #8, #6,
#900] /
#522 = TETRA: #71 - STOPPAGE (CHIH) as [#2, #8, #6, #90, #400, #10, #6]
= chûwts (H2351): {UMBRA: #104 % #41 = #22} 1) outside, outward,
*STREET*, the outside;
#954 as [#80, #1, #300, #70, #400, #40, #5, #50, #8] = patéō (G3961): {UMBRA: #1186 % #41 = #38} 1) to tread; 1a) to trample, crush with the
feet; 1b) to advance by setting foot upon, tread upon: *TO* *ENCOUNTER* *SUCCESSFULLY* *THE* *GREATEST* *PERILS* *FROM* *THE* *MACHINATIONS*
*AND* *PERSECUTIONS* *WITH* *WHICH* *SATAN* *WOULD* *FAIN* *THWART*
*THE* *PREACHING* *OF* *THE* *GOSPEL*; 1c) to tread under foot, trample
on, i.e. to treat with insult and contempt: to desecrate the holy city
by devastation and outrage;
#425 as [#4, #70, #50, #300, #1] = dídōmi (G1325): {UMBRA: #868 % #41 =
#7} 1) to give; 2) to give something to someone; 2a) of one's own accord
to give one something, to his advantage; 2a1) to bestow a gift; 2b) to
grant, give to one asking, let have; 2c) to supply, furnish, necessary things; 2d) to give over, deliver; 2d1) to reach out, extend, present;
2d2) of a writing; 2d3) to give over to one's care, intrust, commit; i) something to be administered; ii) *TO* *GIVE* *OR* *COMMIT* *TO* *SOME*
*ONE* *SOMETHING* *TO* *BE* *RELIGIOUSLY* *OBSERVED*; 2d4) to give what
is due or obligatory, to pay: wages or reward; 2d5) to furnish, endue;
2e) to give; 2e1) to cause, profuse, give forth from one's self; i) to
give, hand out lots; 2e2) to appoint to an office; 2e3) to cause to come forth, i.e. as the sea, death and Hell are said to give up the dead who
have been engulfed or received by them; 2e4) to give one to someone as
his own; i) as an object of his saving care; ii) to give one to someone,
to follow him as a leader and master; iii) to give one to someone to
care for his interests; iv) *TO* *GIVE* *ONE* *TO* *SOMEONE* *TO* *WHOM*
*HE* *ALREADY* *BELONGED*, *TO* *RETURN*; 2e5) to grant or permit one;
i) to commission;
PRE-EMPTIVE *CAMEL* ACTION @ 0820 HRS ON 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 GIVES GRAPPLE (328, 425)@[81, 32, 73, 20, 43, 44, 65, 3, 64] PROTOTYPE
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?date:2001.9.11&time:8.20&heuristic&male:328&feme:425&ontic:367&deme:722&idea:425>
{@9: Sup: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#328); Ego: 64 - SINKING: CH'EN (#425)}
TELOS TOTAL: #425 as [#1, #10, #50, #10, #3, #40, #1, #300, #10] =
aínigma (G135): {UMBRA: #115 % #41 = #33} 1) an *OBSCURE* *SAYING*,
enigma, riddle; 2) an obscure thing;
#827 - MALE CHECKSUM TOTAL: #328 as [#400, #400, #3, #6, #4, #4, #10] = gâdad (H1413): {UMBRA: #11 % #41 = #11} 1) *TO* *PENETRATE*, *CUT*, *ATTACK*, *INVADE*; 1a) (Qal) to penetrate, cut into; 1b) (Hithpoel);
1b1) to cut oneself; 1b2) to gather in troops or crowds;
#1721 - FEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #425 as [#20, #70, #200, #40, #70, #20,
#100, #1, #300, #800, #100] = kosmokrátōr (G2888): {UMBRA: #1721 % #41 = #40} 1) *LORD* *OF* *THE* *WORLD*, *PRINCE* *OF* *THIS* *AGE*; 1a) the
devil and his demons;
#691 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #367 as [#6, #2, #3, #40, #30, #10, #600] = gâmâl (H1581): {UMBRA: #73 % #41 = #32} 1) *CAMEL*; 1a) as property, as beast of burden, for riding, forbidden for food;
#341 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #722 as [#200, #80, #1, #50, #10] = râphâʼ (H7495): {UMBRA: #281 % #41 = #35} 1) to heal, make healthful; 1a) (Qal)
to heal; 1a1) of God; 1a2) healer, physician (of men); 1a3) *OF* *HURTS*
*OF* *NATIONS* *INVOLVING* *RESTORED* *FAVOUR* (fig); 1a4) of individual distresses (fig); 1b) (Niphal) to be healed; 1b1) literal (of persons);
1b2) of water, pottery; 1b3) of national hurts (fig); 1b4) of personal distress (fig); 1c) (Piel) to heal; 1c1) literal; 1c2) of national
defects or hurts (fig); 1d) (Hithpael) in order to get healed (infinitive);
------------
#443 - FEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #281 as [#5, #60, #5, #80, #30, #1, #3, #8,
#200, #1, #50] = ekplḗssō (G1605): {UMBRA: #1343 % #41 = #31} 1) to
strike out, expel by a blow, drive out or away; 2) to cast off by a
blow, to drive out; 2a) commonly, to strike one out of self-possession,
to strike with panic, shock, astonish; 3) *TO* *BE* *STRUCK* *WITH* *AMAZEMENT*, *ASTONISHED*, *AMAZED*;
#871 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #487 as [#6, #400, #300, #40, #70, #50, #5]
= shâmaʻ (H8085): {UMBRA: #410 % #41 = #41} 1) *TO* *HEAR*, *LISTEN*
*TO*, *OBEY*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to hear (perceive by ear); 1a2) to hear of
or concerning; 1a3) to hear (have power to hear); 1a4) to hear with
attention or interest, listen to; 1a5) to understand (language); 1a6) to
hear (of judicial cases); 1a7) to listen, give heed; i) to consent,
agree; ii) to grant request; 1a8) to listen to, yield to; 1a9) to obey,
be obedient; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be heard (of voice or sound); 1b2) to
be heard of; 1b3) to be regarded, be obeyed; 1c) (Piel) to cause to
hear, call to hear, summon; 1d) (Hiphil); 1d1) to cause to hear, *TELL*, proclaim, utter a sound; 1d2) to sound aloud (musical term); 1d3) to
make proclamation, summon; 1d4) to cause to be heard; 1e) sound;
#1091 - FEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #281 as [#6, #20, #80, #300, #70, #10, #5,
#600] = peshaʻ (H6588): {UMBRA: #450 % #41 = #40} 1) transgression, rebellion; 1a) *TRANSGRESSION* (*AGAINST* *INDIVIDUALS*); 1b)
*TRANSGRESSION* (*NATION* *AGAINST* *NATION*); 1c) *TRANSGRESSION*
(*AGAINST* *GOD*); 1c1) in general; 1c2) as recognised by sinner; 1c3)
as God deals with it; 1c4) as God forgives; 1d) guilt of transgression;
1e) punishment for transgression; 1f) offering for transgression;
#374 - MALE CHECKSUM TOTAL: #354 as [#300, #6, #2, #10, #50, #6] =
shâbâh (H7617): {UMBRA: #307 % #41 = #20} 1) *TO* *TAKE* *CAPTIVE*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to take captive; 1a2) captive (participle); 1a3) to lead
captive; 1b) (Niphal) to be taken captive;
#183 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #186 as [#7, #70, #100, #6] = zâʻaq
(H2199): {UMBRA: #177 % #41 = #13} 1) *TO* *CRY*, *CRY* *OUT*, *CALL*,
*CALL* *FOR* *HELP*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to call (to one's aid); 1a2) to
cry, cry out (in need); 1b) (Niphal) to be assembled, be called
together, be joined together; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to call, call out, call together, summon; 1c2) to make a crying, proclaim; 1c3) to have a proclamation made; 1c4) to call out to, call out at;
#554 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #186 as [#400, #50, #8, #40, #50, #6] =
nâcham (H5162): {UMBRA: #98 % #41 = #16} 1) *TO* *BE* *SORRY*, *CONSOLE* *ONESELF*, *REPENT*, *REGRET*, *COMFORT*, *BE* *COMFORTED*; 1a)
(Niphal); 1a1) to be sorry, be moved to pity, have compassion; 1a2) to
be sorry, rue, suffer grief, repent; 1a3) to comfort oneself, be
comforted; 1a4) to comfort oneself, ease oneself; 1b) (Piel) to comfort, console; 1c) (Pual) to be comforted, be consoled; 1d) (Hithpael); 1d1)
to be sorry, have compassion; 1d2) to rue, repent of; 1d3) to comfort oneself, be comforted; 1d4) to ease oneself;
#1181 - MALE CHECKSUM TOTAL: #354 as [#80, #100, #70, #5, #30, #80, #9,
#7, #800] = proelpízō (G4276): {UMBRA: #1182 % #41 = #34} 1) to *HOPE* before;
#186 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #186 as [#6, #40, #80, #50, #10] /
#206 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #186 as [#6, #40, #80, #50, #10, #20] =
pânîym (H6440): {UMBRA: #180 % #41 = #16} 1) *FACE*; 1a) face, faces;
1b) presence, person; 1c) face (of seraphim or cherubim); 1d) face (of animals); 1e) face, surface (of ground); 1f) as adv of loc/temp; 1f1)
before and behind, toward, in front of, forward, formerly, from
beforetime, before; 1g) with prep; 1g1) in front of, before, to the
front of, in the presence of, in the face of, at the face or front of,
from the presence of, from before, from before the face of;
#102 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #186 as [#30, #2, #50, #20] = bên (H1121): {UMBRA: #52 % #41 = #11} 1) son, grandson, child, member of a group; 1a)
son, male child; 1b) grandson; 1c) *CHILDREN* (pl. - male and female);
1d) youth, young men (pl.); 1e) young (of animals); 1f) sons (as characterisation, i.e. sons of injustice [for un- righteous men] or sons
of God [for angels]; 1g) people (of a nation) (pl.); 1h) of lifeless
things, i.e. sparks, stars, arrows (fig.); 1i) a member of a guild,
order, class;
#616 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #186 as [#40, #10, #50, #10, #100, #6,
#400] = yânaq (H3243): {UMBRA: #160 % #41 = #37} 1) to suckle, nurse,
suck; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to suck; 1a2) suckling, *BABE* (subst); 1b)
(Hiphil); 1b1) to give suck to, nurse; 1b2) nursing, nursing woman,
nurse (participle);
#599 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #186 as [#1, #3, #1, #80, #8, #200, #1,
#300, #5] = agapáō (G25): {UMBRA: #886 % #41 = #25} 1) of persons; 1a)
to welcome, to entertain, to be fond of, *TO* *LOVE* *DEARLY*; 2) of
things; 2a) to be well pleased, to be contented at or with a thing;
"AND AGAIN I SAY UNTO YOU, IT IS EASIER FOR A CAMEL TO GO THROUGH THE *EYE*-G5169 OF A NEEDLE, THAN FOR A RICH MAN (ie. a COUNTY COURT JUDGE
ON 13 SEPTEMBER 2023 SHOWED A CONTEMPT FOR THIS ACTION ALBEIT WE HAD AN INCORRECT LOCUS) TO ENTER INTO THE KINGDOM OF GOD.
#929 - FEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #281 as [#300, #100, #400, #80, #8, #40, #1]
= trýpēma (G5169): {UMBRA: #929 % #41 = #27} 1) a hole, (*EYE* *OF*
*THE* *NEEDLE*);
YOUTUBE: "GLORIA IN EXELSIS DEO (OSWALD SATTLER)"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXgOOtzxyy8>
WHEN HIS DISCIPLES HEARD IT, THEY WERE EXCEEDINGLY AMAZED, SAYING, WHO
THEN CAN BE SAVED? BUT JESUS BEHELD THEM, AND SAID UNTO THEM, WITH MEN
THIS IS IMPOSSIBLE; BUT WITH GOD ALL THINGS ARE POSSIBLE." [Matthew
19:24-26]
#508 = #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY + #57 - GUARDEDNESS (SHOU) / FEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #427 as [#20, #30, #8, #100, #70, #50, #70, #40, #70,
#50] = klēronómos (G2818): {UMBRA: #658 % #41 = #2} 1) one who receives
by lot, an heir; 1a) an heir; 1b) *IN* *MESSIANIC* *USAGE*, *ONE* *WHO* *RECEIVES* *HIS* *ALLOTTED* *POSSESSION* *BY* *RIGHT* *OF* *SONSHIP*; 2)
one who has acquired or obtained the portion allotted to him;
GRAPPLE (200, 427)@[12, 76, 30, 50, 57, 42, 63, 17, 80] PROTOTYPE

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?date:2024.2.14&time:6.48&heuristic&male:200&feme:427&ontic:368&deme:473&idea:427>
{@9: Sup: 22 - RESISTANCE: KE (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED
PROPERTY {%8} / I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8}); Ego: 80 - LABOURING: CH'IN (#427)}
TELOS TOTAL: #427 as [#20, #5, #100, #1, #300, #1] = kéras (G2768):
{UMBRA: #326 % #41 = #39} 1) a horn; 1a) of animals; 1b) since animals
(esp. bulls) defend themselves with their horns, the horn with the
Hebrews (and other nations) is a symbol of strength and courage, and
used as such in a variety of phrases; 1b1) *A* *MIGHTY* *AND* *VALIANT* *HELPER*, *THE* *AUTHOR* *OF* *DELIVERANCE*, of the Messiah; 1c) a
projecting extremity in a shape like a horn, a point, apex: as of an altar;
#427 as [#4, #5, #8, #200, #10, #200] = déēsis (G1162): {UMBRA: #427 %
#41 = #17} 1) need, indigence, want, privation, penury; 2) *A*
*SEEKING*, *ASKING*, *ENTREATING*, *ENTREATY* *TO* *GOD* *OR* *TO* *MAN*;
#382 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 14 FEBRUARY 2024 as [#5, #10, #200, #8, #30, #9, #70, #50] /
#427 as [#5, #10, #200, #8, #30, #9, #70, #40, #5, #50] = eisérchomai (G1525): {UMBRA: #1041 % #41 = #16} 1) to go out or come in: to enter;
1a) of men or animals, as into a house or a city; 1b) of Satan taking possession of the body of a person; 1c) of things: as food, that enters
into the eater's mouth; 2) metaph.; 2a) *OF* *ENTRANCE* *INTO* *ANY* *CONDITION*, *STATE* *OF* *THINGS*, *SOCIETY*, *EMPLOYMENT*; 2a1) to
arise, come into existence, begin to be; 2a2) of men, to come before the public; 2a3) to come into life; 2b) of thoughts that come into the mind;
#427 as [#5, #20, #400, #2] /
#462 = #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY + #11 - DIVERGENCE (CH'A) as [#20,
#400, #2, #40] = kâthâb (H3791): {UMBRA: #422 % #41 = #12} 1) a writing, document, edict; 1a) register, enrolment, roll; 1b) *MODE* *OF*
*WRITING*, *CHARACTER*, *LETTER*; 1c) letter, document, a writing; 1d) a written edict; 1d1) of royal enactment; 1d2) of divine authority;
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #368
DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #473 = #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY + #22 -
RESISTANCE (KE)
#558 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #473 as [#80, #300, #8, #50, #70, #50] =
ptēnón (G4421): {UMBRA: #558 % #41 = #25} 1) *FURNISHED* *WITH* *WINGS*;
2) winged, flying; 2a) of birds;
BING GPT4 ASSISTED SEARCH @ 0648 HOURS ON 14 FEBRUARY 2024: “The ANKH or Anh is the same TAU CROSS, but with a round or oval top, symbolizing
eternity and immortality. It is also called CRUX ANSATA or the Cross of
life. The TAU CROSS started life in Egypt as a pagan symbol and was
later adopted by CHRISTIANS (COPTS).
#1318 - FEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #427 as [#20, #8, #100, #400, #60, #70,
#400, #200, #10, #50] = kērýssō (G2784): {UMBRA: #1728 % #41 = #6} 1) to be a herald, to officiate as a herald; 1a) to proclaim after the manner
of a herald; 1b) always with the suggestion of formality, gravity and an authority which must be listened to and obeyed; 2) *TO* *PUBLISH*,
*PROCLAIM* *OPENLY*: *SOMETHING* *WHICH* *HAS* *BEEN* *DONE*; 3) *USED*
*OF* *THE* *PUBLIC* *PROCLAMATION* *OF* *THE* *GOSPEL* *AND* *MATTERS* *PERTAINING* *TO* *IT*, made by John the Baptist, by Jesus, by the
apostles and other Christian teachers;
#1121 as [#200, #300, #1, #400, #100, #70, #50] = staurós (G4716):
{UMBRA: #1271 % #41 = #41} 1) a cross; 1a) *A* *WELL* *KNOWN*
*INSTRUMENT* *OF* *MOST* *CRUEL* *AND* *IGNOMINIOUS* *PUNISHMENT*,
borrowed by the Greeks and Romans from the Phoenicians; to it were
affixed among the Romans, down to the time of Constantine the Great, the guiltiest criminals, particularly the basest slaves, robbers, the
authors and abetters of insurrections, and occasionally in the
provinces, at the arbitrary pleasure of the governors, upright and
peaceable men also, and even Roman citizens themselves; 1b) the
crucifixion which Christ underwent; 2) an upright 'stake', esp. a
pointed one, used as such in fences or palisades;
The Greek word σταυρός, which in the New Testament refers to the structure on which Jesus died, appears as early as AD 200 in two papyri, Papyrus 66 and Papyrus 75 in a form that includes the use of a
cross-like combination of the letters tau and rho. This TAU-RHO / #871 = [#300, #1, #400, #100, #70] symbol, the staurogram, appears also in
Papyrus 45 (dated 250), again in relation to the crucifixion of Jesus. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tau_cross>

<https://www.ebay.com/itm/403783656640>
#871 as [#20, #400, #5, #40, #6, #400] = tᵉhôwm (H8415): {UMBRA: #451 % #41 = #41} 1) deep, depths, deep places, abyss, the deep, sea; 1a) deep
(of subterranean waters); 1b) *DEEP*, *SEA*, *ABYSSES* (*OF* *SEA*); 1c) *PRIMEVAL* *OCEAN*, *DEEP*; 1d) deep, depth (of river); 1e) *ABYSS*,
*THE* *GRAVE*;
#871 as [#5, #60, #6, #800] = çûwph (H5488): {UMBRA: #146 % #41 = #23}
1) *REED*, *RUSH*, water plant; 1a) rushes; 1b) sea of rushes; 1b1) of
Red Sea; 1b2) of arms of Red Sea; 1b3) of Gulf of Suez; 1b4) of sea from straits to Gulf of Akaba;
#772 - MALE CHECKSUM TOTAL: #200 as [#6, #10, #50, #70, #30, #6, #600] = nâʻal (H5274): {UMBRA: #150 % #41 = #27} 1) to bar, lock, bolt; 1a)
(Qal) to bar, lock, bolt; 2) *TO* *FURNISH* *WITH* *SANDALS*, shoe; 2a)
(Qal) to shoe; 2b) (Hiphil) to give sandals;
Egyptologist Sir Alan H. Gardiner (1879 - 1963) thought it developed
from a sandal strap with the top loop going around one's ankle and the vertical post attached to a sole at the toes. Gardiner came to his
conclusion because the Egyptian word for "sandal" was "nkh" which came
from the same root as "ANKH" and, further, because the sandal was a part
of one's daily life in ancient Egypt and the ANKH sign came to symbolize life. This theory has never gained wide acceptance, however. <https://www.worldhistory.org/Ankh/>
#353 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #368 as [#6, #30, #1, #60, #6, #200, #10,
#40] /
#811 - MALE CHECKSUM TOTAL: #200 as [#50, #1, #60, #200, #500] = ʼâçar (H631): {UMBRA: #261 % #41 = #15} 1) to tie, bind, imprison; 1a) (Qal);
1a1) to tie, bind; 1a2) to tie, harness; 1a3) *TO* *BIND* (*WITH*
*CORDS*); 1a4) *TO* *GIRD* (*RARE* *AND* *LATE*); 1a5) to begin the
battle, make the attack; 1a6) of obligation of oath (figurative); 1b) (Niphal) to be imprisoned, bound; 1c) (Pual) to be taken prisoner;
The theory of Egyptologist E.A. Wallis Budge (1857-1934), who claims it originated from the belt buckle of the goddess TAU CROSS, is considered
more probable but still not universally accepted. Wallis Budge equated
the ANKH with the Egyptian symbol TJET, the "KNOT OF ISIS", a ceremonial girdle thought to represent female genitalia and symbolizing fertility. <https://www.worldhistory.org/Ankh/>
#329 - MALE CHECKSUM TOTAL: #200 as [#6, #40, #7, #200, #70, #6] = zeraʻ (H2233): {UMBRA: #277 % #41 = #31} 1) seed, sowing, offspring; 1a) a
sowing; 1b) seed; 1c) *SEMEN* *VIRILE*; 1d) offspring, descendants, posterity, children; 1e) of moral quality; 1e1) a practitioner of righteousness (fig.); 1f) sowing time (by meton);
#393 - MALE CHECKSUM TOTAL: #200 as [#40, #3, #300, #10, #40] = nâgash (H5066): {UMBRA: #353 % #41 = #25} 1) to draw near, approach; 1a) (Qal)
to draw or come near; 1a1) of humans; i) of *SEXUAL* *INTERCOURSE*; 1a2)
of inanimate subject; i) to approach one another; 1a3) (Niphal) to draw
near; 1a4) (Hiphil) to cause to approach, bring near, bring; 1a5)
(Hophal) to be brought near; 1a6) (Hithpael) to draw near;
The Egyptian hieroglyph representing life is called the ANKH. The ANKH
cross of Egypt is a TAU CROSS that is topped by an inverted tear shape
and associated with MAAT, the goddess of Truth. It also represents the *SEXUAL* *UNION* of ISIS, the Egyptian archetypal wife and mother, and OSIRIS, the Egyptian god of life, death, and fertility.”
#246 - MALE CHECKSUM TOTAL: #200 as [#40, #200, #1, #5] = marʼâh
(H4759): {UMBRA: #246 % #41 = #41} 1) vision; 1a) mode of revelation; 2) *MIRROR*;
#690 - MALE CHECKSUM TOTAL: #200 as [#1, #200, #300, #100, #1, #80, #8]
= astrapḗ (G796): {UMBRA: #690 % #41 = #34} 1) lightning; 1a) of the *GLEAM* *OF* *A* *LAMP*;
The association of the ANKH with the *MIRROR* was no chance occurrence.
The Egyptians believed that the afterlife was a *MIRROR* image of life
on earth and *MIRRORS* were thought to contain magical properties.
During the FESTIVAL OF THE *LANTERNS* for the goddess NEITH (another
deity seen with the ANKH) all of ancient Egypt would burn oil *LAMPS*
through the night to reflect the stars of the sky and create a *MIRROR*
image of the heavens on earth. This was done to help part the veil
between the living and the dead so one could speak to those friends and
loved ones who had passed on to paradise in the FIELD OF *REEDS*. The
ANKH represents the *MALE* *AND* *FEMALE* *GENITALIA*, the *SUN*
*COMING* *OVER* *THE* *HORIZON*, and the union of heaven and earth. This association with the sun means that the ankh is traditionally drawn in
*GOLD* - the color of the sun - and never in silver, which relates to
the moon. Deities such as ANUBIS or ISIS are often seen placing the ANKH
"AND AGAIN I SAY UNTO YOU, IT IS EASIER FOR A CAMEL TO GO THROUGH THE *EYE*-G5169 OF A NEEDLE, THAN FOR A RICH MAN (ie. a COUNTY COURT JUDGE
ON 13 SEPTEMBER 2023 SHOWED A CONTEMPT FOR THIS ACTION ALBEIT WE HAD AN INCORRECT LOCUS) TO ENTER INTO THE KINGDOM OF GOD.
#929 - FEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #281 as [#300, #100, #400, #80, #8, #40, #1]
= trýpēma (G5169): {UMBRA: #929 % #41 = #27} 1) a hole, (*EYE* *OF*
*THE* *NEEDLE*);
YOUTUBE: "GLORIA IN EXELSIS DEO (OSWALD SATTLER)"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXgOOtzxyy8>
WHEN HIS DISCIPLES HEARD IT, THEY WERE EXCEEDINGLY AMAZED, SAYING, WHO
THEN CAN BE SAVED? BUT JESUS BEHELD THEM, AND SAID UNTO THEM, WITH MEN
THIS IS IMPOSSIBLE; BUT WITH GOD ALL THINGS ARE POSSIBLE." [Matthew
19:24-26]
#508 = #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY + #57 - GUARDEDNESS (SHOU) / FEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #427 as [#20, #30, #8, #100, #70, #50, #70, #40, #70,
#50] = klēronómos (G2818): {UMBRA: #658 % #41 = #2} 1) one who receives
by lot, an heir; 1a) an heir; 1b) *IN* *MESSIANIC* *USAGE*, *ONE* *WHO* *RECEIVES* *HIS* *ALLOTTED* *POSSESSION* *BY* *RIGHT* *OF* *SONSHIP*; 2)
one who has acquired or obtained the portion allotted to him;
GRAPPLE (200, 427)@[12, 76, 30, 50, 57, 42, 63, 17, 80] PROTOTYPE

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?date:2024.2.14&time:6.48&heuristic&male:200&feme:427&ontic:368&deme:473&idea:427>
{@9: Sup: 22 - RESISTANCE: KE (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED
PROPERTY {%8} / I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8}); Ego: 80 - LABOURING: CH'IN (#427)}
TELOS TOTAL: #427 as [#20, #5, #100, #1, #300, #1] = kéras (G2768):
{UMBRA: #326 % #41 = #39} 1) a horn; 1a) of animals; 1b) since animals
(esp. bulls) defend themselves with their horns, the horn with the
Hebrews (and other nations) is a symbol of strength and courage, and
used as such in a variety of phrases; 1b1) *A* *MIGHTY* *AND* *VALIANT* *HELPER*, *THE* *AUTHOR* *OF* *DELIVERANCE*, of the Messiah; 1c) a
projecting extremity in a shape like a horn, a point, apex: as of an altar;
#427 as [#4, #5, #8, #200, #10, #200] = déēsis (G1162): {UMBRA: #427 %
#41 = #17} 1) need, indigence, want, privation, penury; 2) *A*
*SEEKING*, *ASKING*, *ENTREATING*, *ENTREATY* *TO* *GOD* *OR* *TO* *MAN*;
#382 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 14 FEBRUARY 2024 as [#5, #10, #200, #8, #30, #9, #70, #50] /
#427 as [#5, #10, #200, #8, #30, #9, #70, #40, #5, #50] = eisérchomai (G1525): {UMBRA: #1041 % #41 = #16} 1) to go out or come in: to enter;
1a) of men or animals, as into a house or a city; 1b) of Satan taking possession of the body of a person; 1c) of things: as food, that enters
into the eater's mouth; 2) metaph.; 2a) *OF* *ENTRANCE* *INTO* *ANY* *CONDITION*, *STATE* *OF* *THINGS*, *SOCIETY*, *EMPLOYMENT*; 2a1) to
arise, come into existence, begin to be; 2a2) of men, to come before the public; 2a3) to come into life; 2b) of thoughts that come into the mind;
#427 as [#5, #20, #400, #2] /
#462 = #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY + #11 - DIVERGENCE (CH'A) as [#20,
#400, #2, #40] = kâthâb (H3791): {UMBRA: #422 % #41 = #12} 1) a writing, document, edict; 1a) register, enrolment, roll; 1b) *MODE* *OF*
*WRITING*, *CHARACTER*, *LETTER*; 1c) letter, document, a writing; 1d) a written edict; 1d1) of royal enactment; 1d2) of divine authority;
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #368
DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #473 = #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY + #22 -
RESISTANCE (KE)
#558 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #473 as [#80, #300, #8, #50, #70, #50] =
ptēnón (G4421): {UMBRA: #558 % #41 = #25} 1) *FURNISHED* *WITH* *WINGS*;
2) winged, flying; 2a) of birds;
BING GPT4 ASSISTED SEARCH @ 0648 HOURS ON 14 FEBRUARY 2024: “The ANKH or Anh is the same TAU CROSS, but with a round or oval top, symbolizing
eternity and immortality. It is also called CRUX ANSATA or the Cross of
life. The TAU CROSS started life in Egypt as a pagan symbol and was
later adopted by CHRISTIANS (COPTS).
#1318 - FEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #427 as [#20, #8, #100, #400, #60, #70,
#400, #200, #10, #50] = kērýssō (G2784): {UMBRA: #1728 % #41 = #6} 1) to be a herald, to officiate as a herald; 1a) to proclaim after the manner
of a herald; 1b) always with the suggestion of formality, gravity and an authority which must be listened to and obeyed; 2) *TO* *PUBLISH*,
*PROCLAIM* *OPENLY*: *SOMETHING* *WHICH* *HAS* *BEEN* *DONE*; 3) *USED*
*OF* *THE* *PUBLIC* *PROCLAMATION* *OF* *THE* *GOSPEL* *AND* *MATTERS* *PERTAINING* *TO* *IT*, made by John the Baptist, by Jesus, by the
apostles and other Christian teachers;
#1121 as [#200, #300, #1, #400, #100, #70, #50] = staurós (G4716):
{UMBRA: #1271 % #41 = #41} 1) a cross; 1a) *A* *WELL* *KNOWN*
*INSTRUMENT* *OF* *MOST* *CRUEL* *AND* *IGNOMINIOUS* *PUNISHMENT*,
borrowed by the Greeks and Romans from the Phoenicians; to it were
affixed among the Romans, down to the time of Constantine the Great, the guiltiest criminals, particularly the basest slaves, robbers, the
authors and abetters of insurrections, and occasionally in the
provinces, at the arbitrary pleasure of the governors, upright and
peaceable men also, and even Roman citizens themselves; 1b) the
crucifixion which Christ underwent; 2) an upright 'stake', esp. a
pointed one, used as such in fences or palisades;
The Greek word σταυρός, which in the New Testament refers to the structure on which Jesus died, appears as early as AD 200 in two papyri, Papyrus 66 and Papyrus 75 in a form that includes the use of a
cross-like combination of the letters tau and rho. This TAU-RHO / #871 = [#300, #1, #400, #100, #70] symbol, the staurogram, appears also in
Papyrus 45 (dated 250), again in relation to the crucifixion of Jesus. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tau_cross>

<https://www.ebay.com/itm/403783656640>
#871 as [#20, #400, #5, #40, #6, #400] = tᵉhôwm (H8415): {UMBRA: #451 % #41 = #41} 1) deep, depths, deep places, abyss, the deep, sea; 1a) deep
(of subterranean waters); 1b) *DEEP*, *SEA*, *ABYSSES* (*OF* *SEA*); 1c) *PRIMEVAL* *OCEAN*, *DEEP*; 1d) deep, depth (of river); 1e) *ABYSS*,
*THE* *GRAVE*;
#871 as [#5, #60, #6, #800] = çûwph (H5488): {UMBRA: #146 % #41 = #23}
1) *REED*, *RUSH*, water plant; 1a) rushes; 1b) sea of rushes; 1b1) of
Red Sea; 1b2) of arms of Red Sea; 1b3) of Gulf of Suez; 1b4) of sea from straits to Gulf of Akaba;
#772 - MALE CHECKSUM TOTAL: #200 as [#6, #10, #50, #70, #30, #6, #600] = nâʻal (H5274): {UMBRA: #150 % #41 = #27} 1) to bar, lock, bolt; 1a)
(Qal) to bar, lock, bolt; 2) *TO* *FURNISH* *WITH* *SANDALS*, shoe; 2a)
(Qal) to shoe; 2b) (Hiphil) to give sandals;
Egyptologist Sir Alan H. Gardiner (1879 - 1963) thought it developed
from a sandal strap with the top loop going around one's ankle and the vertical post attached to a sole at the toes. Gardiner came to his
conclusion because the Egyptian word for "sandal" was "nkh" which came
from the same root as "ANKH" and, further, because the sandal was a part
of one's daily life in ancient Egypt and the ANKH sign came to symbolize life. This theory has never gained wide acceptance, however. <https://www.worldhistory.org/Ankh/>
#353 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #368 as [#6, #30, #1, #60, #6, #200, #10,
#40] /
#811 - MALE CHECKSUM TOTAL: #200 as [#50, #1, #60, #200, #500] = ʼâçar (H631): {UMBRA: #261 % #41 = #15} 1) to tie, bind, imprison; 1a) (Qal);
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 09:36:19 |
| Calls: | 10,388 |
| Calls today: | 3 |
| Files: | 14,061 |
| Messages: | 6,416,843 |
| Posted today: | 1 |
