XPost: england.religion.islam, alt.islam.sufism, alt.islam
XPost: alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic

There are some concerns which arise from the insensibility as its
possible emotive manipulation of the heart and its character of courage
or assertiveness [ie. #911 = ῥάχις: "backbone, spine"] for action...

1) Which we have firstly identified as being a morphosis scenario [#230, #232, #249, #228, #237] made upon the #33 - CLOSENESSS (MU) against the AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER

TETRAD MENTIONS OF [rì (日): *SUN*] @ [

#1,
#5,
#13,
#18,
#19 - DISRUPTION OF THE NOEMA?, <-- morphosis scenario [#230, #232,
#249, #228, #237]
#20,
#23,
#24,
#33, <-- AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER
#41,
#47,
#52,
#67,
#70,
#78]

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&glyph:日>

#38 - JUPITER PRINCIPLE (#549 - DEME FOR morphosis = #38 (* IMMATERIAL INCLUSION) + #511: @SUM(TETRAD MENTIONS OF [rì (日): *SUN*]))

#1 #52 #20 #78
#70 #23 #33 #18
#47 #5 #38 #19
#24 #67 #13 #41 = #511 + #38 = #549

2) Secondly, whilst we might easily extrapolate the paradigm of action: #365 - YANG: LUO SHU / #364 - YIN: T'AI HSUAN to domestic violence being likewise #228 - TRAVESTY as occurring within an optimal state of FUSION
(ie. MARRIAGE), ours is only an INFORMAL RESEARCH proposition and we are
not qualified to make any #491 - AGENCY (ie. which is why they are
established) or ONTIC JURISPRUDENCE statements.

57 56 49
66 65 58
75 74 67

74
131
189
238
303
378
444
511
567

3) By which #258 we identified a HETEROS PROTOTYPE #SEVEN (#117 / #351) which has a common LOCUS to the COURSE OF NATURE PARADIGM #65 - INNER
(NEI) / H54 - MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN, CONVERTING THE MAIDEN is then the
CENTRE or AUTONOMOUS DELIMITED PRINCIPLE with a PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY
/ 511 <-- @SUM(TETRAD MENTIONS OF [rì (日): *SUN*]) and by #228 - ONTIC
LIMIT / WITNESSING TRAVESTY AS REPROACH assay as the BIPOLAR REALITY to
LUO SHU SQUARE PROTOTYPE #THREE (#117 / #351) in possessing a meta
descriptor of #75 - FAILURE (SHIH) - 𝍐失 = #526 as COGITO: [#58, #27,
#27, #49, #46] and that our #364 - YIN: T'AI HSUAN assay of an array
ONLY makes an artifice metalogic assertion: [#9 - vCORAL, #8 - vCYAN, #1
... #7 - CAUSALITY].

4) Thus we have cause to question the integrity of any fusion action as the implicit nature of the #365 - YANG: LUO SHU / #364 - YIN: T'AI
HSUAN #205 - TENET + #300 - WISDOM OF ISLAMIC BELIEF HAVING #505 CE
(10x10 MAGIC SQUARE) - HORUS (THE *CHILD*) GROUNDING WITH A BIPARTITE
NUMBER PARADIGM HIJACKED BY NAZISM / ANTI-SEMITISM.

This #365 - YANG: LUO SHU / #364 - YIN: T'AI HSUAN #205 - TENET + #300 -
WISDOM by action of fusion HAVING CHRONOLOGICAL #505 CE (10x10 MAGIC
SQUARE) - HORUS (THE *CHILD*) GROUNDING IS ACTUALLY THE METALOGICAL
BASIS TO SUBSTANTIATE THE CLAIM OF WAR CRIMES / GENOCIDE AGAINST
PALESTINIANS, ISLAMISTS AND THE ARABIC SPEAKING WORLD grounded in a MALE
SELF ENTITLED CONTEMPT WHICH SEES BLASPHEMY AS A PIETY WHICH IS GROUNDED
IN FUSION / COPULATION AND NOT #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY.

From our informal CASE STUDY on RESOLVING ONTIC / DEME #161 - ROTAS TO
NOTIONS OF SCEPTRE (RULERSHIP: 13 SEPTEMBER 2001 / ERII PARLIAMENT
BREXIT PROROGUING FROM SOME POINT BETWEEN 9 - 12 SEPTEMBER 2019), it was reasonably concluded given this linguistic / temporal coefficient
[HEBREW / GREEK: 24 x 7 x 13 x 49 = 294 x 364 = 6J as 107016 days / 293
= 365.2423 solar tropical year] that one could also utilise the same methodology for ARABIC script to obtain the requisite pragma selectors.

6 days x 28 x 13 (or 28 x #78) = #2184 x 49 = 6J (294 x 364 days or 293
x 365.2423 tropical years)

#1561 as [#500, #800, #50, #1, #10, #200] = phōnḗ (G5456): {UMBRA: #1358
% #41 = #5} 1) a sound, a tone; 1a) of inanimate things, as musical instruments; 2) a voice; 2a) of the sound of uttered words; 3) speech;
3a) *OF* *A* *LANGUAGE*, *TONGUE*;

#1561 as [#300, #5, #200, #200, #1, #100, #1, #20, #70, #50, #300, #1,
#5, #300, #8] = tessarakontaetḗs (G5063): {UMBRA: #1761 % #41 = #39} 1)
of *FORTY* *YEARS*, forty years old;

Thus: 293 x 19 year lunar metonic cycle = 5567 + 293 = 5860 with 40
years interior knowledge for EXODUS in 49J1W2D (49th JUBILEE + 9 YEARS)
+ 40 YEARS DESERT SOJOURN

#TAU / #400 YEARS X 365.2423 DAYS = 146,096.92 days

#400 % 22 = 17 SEPTEMBER

...

#592 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #170 as [#9, #5, #70, #300, #8, #200] /
#962 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #170 as [#9, #5, #70, #300, #8, #300, #70,
#200] = theótēs (G2320): {UMBRA: #592 % #41 = #18} 1) deity; 1a) the
state of being God, *GODHEAD*;

#294 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #170 as [#1, #3, #10, #70, #10, #200] =
hágios (G40): {UMBRA: #284 % #41 = #38} 1) *MOST* *HOLY* *THING*, a saint;

#991 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #82 as [#1, #10, #800, #50, #10, #70, #50] = aiṓnios (G166): {UMBRA: #1141 % #41 = #34} 1) without beginning and end,
that which always has been and always will be; 2) *WITHOUT* *BEGINNING*;
3) *WITHOUT* *END*, *NEVER* *TO* *CEASE*, *EVERLASTING*;

#132 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #82 as [#2, #10, #70, #50] = bíos (G979):
{UMBRA: #282 % #41 = #36} 1) *LIFE*; 1a) life extensively; 1a1) the
period or course of life; 1b) that by which life is sustained,
resources, wealth, goods;

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&tetra:60>


<http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH%20Replica%2020240214.jpeg>

#6000 % 22 = 13 SEPTEMBER 2001 <-- #60 - 𝍁積 = #511 as [#1, #60, #50,
#400] = ʼÂçᵉnath (H621): {UMBRA: #511 % #41 = #19} 0) Asenath =
'belonging to the goddess *NEITH*'; 1) the wife of Joseph;

...

#8800 % 22 = #TAU as REPRISE OF INFINITE LOOP

Such an explanation on temporal dimensions of sovereignty (eg: cosmic perspectives likely underlay the notions WAS SCEPTRE: symbol of rule and
power and the ANKH: symbol of life) as then a CONSTITUTIONAL entitlement
for any #940 - POWER TO RULE: (kratéō (G2902): TO HAVE POWER, BE
POWERFUL; TO BE CHIEF, BE MASTER OF, TO RULE) / #298 - LIFE (nephesh
(H5315): [#2, #50, #80, #57, #76, #33]) which likely differs from the traditional understandings of sovereignty within international law
having a central spatial dimension clearly visible in the territorial
bases of state sovereignty. As international law moves towards
considering such notions as fragmented sovereignty, divided or limited sovereignty, the need to consider the spatial dimension of sovereignty
and its implications beyond the simple drawing of lines on the surface
of the globe becomes more prominent. These mutations of the concept of sovereignty also highlight the necessity to consider its temporal
dimension in greater depth and beyond simple linear progression. The
EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF INTERNATIONAL LAW at their 15th Annual Conference,
Athens, 2019, sought to consider if the spatio-temporality of
sovereignty as it has been operating so far is an indispensable element
of international law or if perhaps international law is able to receive
a different, another spatio-temporality of sovereignty, and ultimately
if sovereignty has to be part of international law.

On 3/5/2024 09:53, dolf wrote:

So whilst we might have some divergent metalogic convergent thoughts
upon the #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO ANY DRIVER
FOR ACTION: #524 = [#2, #4, #6, #23, #29, #34, #62, #81, #26, #43, #65,
#69, #80] as being the implied need to be able to withstand against any insensibility as its possible emotive manipulation of the heart and its character of courage or assertiveness [ie. #911 = ῥάχις: "backbone, spine"] for action...

#911 as [#1, #300, #400, #4, #6, #200] = ʼeshtaddûwr (H849): {UMBRA:
#911 % #41 = #9} 1) revolt, sedition;

Such is only a vignette (ie. defining detail about an idea) for
subsequent informal research purposes so that we can by its subsequent reading, then re-immerse within the viable context--to say nothing of contributing to the universe of discourse on such an obtuse subject.

Suffice to say our next logical thinking task will be to consider the contingency of duplicitous hash or rehashed scenarios so that we can
then within the LOADSESSION concept {} give some visual prompt of the exception possibilities and enable the user to make a decision...

On 2/5/2024 16:12, dolf wrote:

Convergent thinking is the type of thinking that focuses on coming up
with the single, well-established answer to a problem. It is oriented
toward deriving the single best, or most often correct answer to a
question. However the optimal course of action is always contingent
(dependent) upon the internal or interior knowledge as metalogical
process associated with semantical comprehension and the external
situation as an astute apprehension of a particular WHAT-IF scenario.

THE SCENARIO: A need to reconcile a disparity between the
data.sessions against the root INFO

Given the possibility of action might involve deleting the vEvent
<div> entry then such process ought to also remove the sessions
[{...}] array of objects entry and so in a strictly conforming sense
of reality such a scenario is unlikely to occur.

var data = Savvy.SPACES.PROBLEM.data.memebrain;
var sessions = {}
var del = [];

for (var node of data.sessions)
     sessions[node.session] = node.item;

// Prune any extraneous sessions

for (var i = 0; i < data.sessions.length; i++) {
     if (!data.sessions[i].exists) {
         del.push (data.sessions[i].session);
         data.sessions.splice (i--, 1);
     }
     delete data.sessions[i].exists;
     data.sessions.item = Math.max (0, i);
}

for (var session of del)
     delete sessions [session];

console.log (data.sessions);

Convergent thinking emphasizes speed, accuracy, and logic and focuses
on recognizing the familiar, reapplying techniques, and accumulating
stored information. It is most effective in situations where an answer
readily exists and simply needs to be either recalled or worked out
through decision making strategies. A critical aspect of convergent
thinking is that it leads to a single best answer, leaving no room for
ambiguity. In this view, answers are either right or wrong. The
solution that is derived at the end of the convergent thinking process
is the best possible answer the majority of the time.

var root = d3.select (`#${data.root}`);
var hold = d3.select (`#${data.hold}`);
var nodes = root.selectAll (`div[data-session]`).nodes ();
var sessions = {}

for (var node of data.sessions) {
     sessions[node.session] = node.item;
     node.valid = false;
     node.exists = false;
     node.changed = false;
     node.load = false
}

parseSession ({sessions: data.sessions, segment: root, load: false});
parseSession ({sessions: data.sessions, segment: hold, load: true});

return;

function parseSession (act) {

     var nodes = act.segment.selectAll (`div[data-session]`).nodes (); >>      var item = 0;
     var hash = null;
     var session = null;

     Savvy.PAYLOAD[o.notion].trimExpansions (act.segment,
act.sessions, true);

     for (var i = 0; i < nodes.length; i++) {

         session = nodes[i].getAttribute('data-session');
         hash = Savvy.sha256(d3.select(nodes[i]).html());

         switch (true) {
         case (!act.load && sessions.hasOwnProperty (session)) :
             item = sessions [session];
             act.sessions[item].exists = true;
             act.sessions[item].valid = (hash ==
act.sessions[item].hash) ? true : false;
             break;
         case (act.load && sessions.hasOwnProperty (session)) :
             item = sessions [session];
             act.sessions[item].valid = (hash ==
nodes[i].getAttribute('data-hash')) ? true : false;
             act.sessions[item].exists = true;
             act.sessions[item].changed = (act.sessions[item].valid &&
hash != act.sessions[item].hash) ? true : false;
             if (act.sessions[item].changed)
                 act.sessions[item].load = true;
             break;
         case (act.load && !sessions.hasOwnProperty (session)) :
             sessions[session] = item = act.sessions.length;
             act.sessions[item] = {item: item, write: false, session:
session, hash: nodes[i].getAttribute('data-hash'), exists: false,
changed: false, load: true}
             act.sessions[item].valid = (hash ==
nodes[i].getAttribute('data-hash')) ? true : false;
             break;
         }

     }

     Savvy.PAYLOAD[o.notion].trimExpansions (act.segment,
act.sessions, false);

     return (act.sessions);

}

Convergent thinking is also linked to knowledge as it involves
manipulating existing knowledge by means of standard procedures.
Knowledge is another important aspect of creativity. It is a source of
ideas, suggests pathways to solutions, and provides criteria of
effectiveness and novelty. Convergent thinking is used as a tool in
creative problem solving. When an individual is using critical
thinking to solve a problem they consciously use standards or
probabilities to make judgments. This contrasts with divergent
thinking where judgment is deferred while looking for and accepting
many possible solutions.

Convergent thinking is often used in conjunction with divergent
thinking. Divergent thinking typically occurs in a spontaneous,
free-flowing manner, where many creative ideas are generated and
evaluated. Multiple possible solutions are explored in a short amount
of time, and unexpected connections are drawn. After the process of
divergent thinking has been completed, ideas and information are
organized and structured using convergent thinking to decision making
strategies are used leading to a single-best, or most often correct
answer. Examples of divergent thinking include using brainstorming,
free writing and creative thinking at the beginning of the problem
solving process to generate possible solutions that can be evaluated
later. Once a sufficient number of ideas have been explored,
convergent thinking can be used. Knowledge, logic, probabilities and
other decision-making strategies are taken into consideration as the
solutions are evaluated individually in a search for a single best
answer which when reached is unambiguous.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convergent_thinking>


Thus the "PRUNE ANY EXTRANEOUS SESSIONS" proposition as only a
conjecture represents an instance of thinking which may not be cogent
as an end result that is absent of any utility of purpose, but as an
exercise in process, it may, like a phonetic apprehension, still be
comprehended as are some of BING CHAT GPT's rudimentary algorithmic
propositions.  However the premise: 24 x 7 = #168 x 13 suggests there
is a ontic grounding: 21 - consonants (ie. a basic speech sound in
which the breath is at least partly obstructed) x 8 - AUTONOMOUS
DELIMITER PROTOTYPE? #241 = [#2, #4, #6, #23, #29, #34, #62, #81] to
the process of rationality as then a correspondence (ie. 5 x #168 =
#840) between temporality (21 x 8 = #168 x 13) and language.

#740 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #840 as [#40, #40, #50, #10, #600] =
mânâh (H4487): {UMBRA: #95 % #41 = #13} 1) to count, reckon, number,
assign, tell, appoint, prepare; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to count, number; 1a2)
reckon, assign, appoint; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be counted, be
numbered; 1b2) to be reckoned, be assigned; 1c) (Piel) to appoint,
ordain; 1d) (Pual) appointed (participle);

"So teach us to number-H4487 our days, that we may apply our hearts
unto wisdom." [Psalm 90:12]

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?date:2024.5.2&bible:Psalm@90:12>

Of the seven words within that thought vMEME, there is only one word
without any NOUMENON RESONANCE for this date 2 MAY 2024 which is #34
as [#30, #2, #2] = lêbâb (H3824): {UMBRA: #34 % #41 = #34} 1) inner
man, mind, will, heart, soul, understanding; 1a) inner part, midst;
1a1) midst (of things); 1a2) heart (of man); 1a3) soul, heart (of
man); 1a4) mind, knowledge, thinking, reflection, memory; 1a5)
inclination, resolution, determination (of will); 1a6) conscience;
1a7) heart (of moral character); 1a8) as seat of appetites; 1a9) as
seat of emotions and passions; 1a10) as seat of courage;

[#2] {@1: Sup: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#2); Ego: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU
(#2)}
[#4, {@2: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#8); Ego: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#6)}
#6, {@3: Sup: 12 - YOUTHFULNESS: T'UNG (#20); Ego: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI
(#12)}
#23, {@4: Sup: 35 - GATHERING: LIEN (#55); Ego: 23 - EASE: YI (#35)}
#29, {@5: Sup: 64 - SINKING: CH'EN (#119 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED
{%35}); Ego: 29 - DECISIVENESS: TUAN (#64)}
#34, {@6: Sup: 17 - HOLDING BACK: JUAN (#136 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED
{%36}); Ego: 34 - KINSHIP: CH'IN (#98 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%24})}
#62, {@7: Sup: 79 - DIFFICULTIES: NAN (#215 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR
A DOER OF MISCHIEF {%34}); Ego: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#160)}
#81] {@8: Sup: 79 - DIFFICULTIES: NAN (#294); Ego: 81 - FOSTERING:
YANG (#241)}

TELOS TOTAL: #241
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #215
DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #353

#241 as [#1, #40, #200] = ʼâmar (H559): {UMBRA: #241 % #41 = #36} 1)
to say, speak, utter; 1a) (Qal) to say, to answer, *TO* *SAY* *IN*
*ONE'S* *HEART*, to think, to command, to promise, to intend; 1b)
(Niphal) to be told, to be said, to be called; 1c) (Hithpael) to
boast, to act proudly; 1d) (Hiphil) to avow, to avouch;

#241 as [#1, #40, #200] = ʼêmer (H561): {UMBRA: #241 % #41 = #36} 1)
utterance, speech, word, saying, promise, command;

#34 - 𝌧親 = #485
COGITO: [#22, #43, #34, #65, #63] as #34 - KINSHIP (CH'IN)
RANGE: noon 19 to 23 MAY

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&tetra:34>

[#22 {@1: Sup: 22 - RESISTANCE: KE (#22); Ego: 22 - RESISTANCE: KE (#22)}
#43 {@2: Sup: 65 - INNER: NEI (#87); Ego: 43 - ENCOUNTERS: YU (#65)}
#34 {@3: Sup: 18 - WAITING: HSI (#105); Ego: 34 - KINSHIP: CH'IN (#99)}
#65 {@4: Sup: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#107); Ego: 65 - INNER: NEI (#164)}
#63] {@5: Sup: 65 - INNER: NEI (#172); Ego: 63 - WATCH: SHIH (#227)}

#647 - MALE CHECKSUM TOTAL: #172 as [#1, #6, #30, #10, #600] = ʼĕvîyl
(H191): {UMBRA: #47 % #41 = #6} 1) be foolish, foolish; 1a) (subst);
1a1) of one who despises wisdom; 1a2) of one who mocks when guilty;
1a3) of one who is quarrelsome; 1a4) of one who is licentious;

#551 - FEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #227 as [#80, #100, #1, #60, #5, #300, #5]
= prássō (G4238): {UMBRA: #1381 % #41 = #28} 1) to exercise, practise,
to be busy with, carry on; 1a) to undertake, to do; 2) to accomplish,
perform; 2a) to commit, perpetrate; 3) to manage public affairs,
transact public business; 3a) to exact tribute, revenue, debts; 4) to
act;

TELOS TOTAL: #227

#153 - Our way of giving men a religious spirit, of teaching them
humility—but without the priests,

#227 - Lola Montez had nothing in common with the dancers of our
times, strip-tease artists and King Ludwig I a "skirt-chaser"
(Schürzenjäger),

YOUTUBE: “LOLA - THE KINKS”

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0L0wFQHcaw>

#277 - The soldier has a boundless *AFFECTION* for the ground on which
he has shed his *BLOOD*."

#51  #25  #74
#73  #50  #27
#26  #75  #49

[TORAH PROTOTYPE (ON BACKS OF JEWS) #NINE DEFAULT QUANTUM: #231 ...
#379 ... #693 / NATURAL PROGRESSION: #150 ... #277 ... #450 = #YOD
(#10) - 10 SEPTEMBER 2001 ... #MEM (#40) ... #TAU (#400)]

#75 - SOLVING THE RELIGIOUS PROBLEM
#126 - VOX IN EXCELSO ("A VOICE FROM ON HIGH")
#153 - ASTRONOMICAL OBSERVATIONS: FIGHT AGAINST FALSEHOOD,
SUPERSTITION AND INTOLERANCE (*SCIENCE* *IS* *NOT* *DOGMATIC* /
*DISBELIEVING* *MIRACLE* *OF* *THE* *EUCHARIST*)
#227 - MEMORIAL TO THE GREAT PEOPLE OF THE NATION (WALHALLA BUILDING)
#277 - SOLDIER HAS A BOUNDLESS AFFECTION (FRENCH WAR GRAVES)
#303 - *NEW* *YORK* *SKY*-*SCRAPERS*: THEIR VULNERABILITY TO AIR ATTACK

CAN IT BE MANIPULATED?

APPRAISAL #1: If kin are not close, their wills (親非其膚)
Grate like teeth in an uneven bite. (其志齦齬)
FATHOMING #1: That kin are not as close as skin (親非其膚)
MEANS: The center heart is closed off. (中心閑也)

qīn (親): 1. relatives, 2. intimate, 3. a bride, 4. parents, 5.
marriage, 6. personally, 7. someone intimately connected to, 8.
friendship, 9. Qin, 10. to be close to, 11. to love, 12. to kiss, 13.
related [by blood], 14. relatives by marriage, 15. a hazelnut tree

fēi (非): 1. not; non-; un-, 2. Kangxi radical 175, 3. wrong; bad;
untruthful, 4. different, 5. to not be; to not have, 6. to violate; to
be contrary to, 7. Africa, 8. to slander, 9. to avoid, 10. must, 11.
an error, 12. a problem; a question, 13. evil, 14. besides; except;
unless

qí (其): 1. his; hers; its; theirs, 2. to add emphasis, 3. used when
asking a question in reply to a question, 4. used when making a
request or giving an order, 5. he; her; it; them, 6. probably; likely,
7. will, 8. may, 9. if, 10. or, 11. Qi

fū (膚): 1. skin, 2. superficial; shallow

...

zhōngxīn (中心): 1. center, 2. heart, 3. core

xián (閑): 1. idle, 2. a fence; a barrier, 3. to defend, 4. a stable,
5. a standard; a regulation, 6. to be well-versed in

TETRAD MENTIONS OF [rì (日): *SUN*] @ [

#1,
#5,
#13,
#18,
#19 - DISRUPTION OF THE NOEMA?, <-- morphosis scenario [#230, #232,
#249, #228, #237]
#20,
#23,
#24,
#33, <-- AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER
#41,
#47,
#52,
#67,
#70,
#78]

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&glyph:日>

#38 - JUPITER PRINCIPLE (#549 - DEME FOR morphosis = #38 (* IMMATERIAL
INCLUSION) + #511: @SUM(TETRAD MENTIONS OF [rì (日): *SUN*]))

  #1 #52 #20 #78
#70 #23 #33 #18
#47  #5 #38 #19
#24 #67 #13 #41 = #511 + #38 = #549

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&glyph:天心>

[#2]

tiānxīn (天心): 1. center of the sky, 2. will of heaven; will of the
Gods; the monarch's will

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&glyph:中心>

[#4, #6, #23, #29, #34, #62, #81]

zhōngxīn (中心): 1. center, 2. heart, 3. core

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&glyph:理>

[#26, #43]

xīn lǐ (心理): mental, psychological

lǐ (理): 1. reason; logic; truth, 2. to manage, 3. to pay attention
to; to take notice of; to regard others with a certain attitude, 4. to
work jade; to remove jade from ore, 5. a natural science, 6. law;
principle; theory; inner principle or structure, 7. to acknowledge; to
respond; to answer, 8. a judge, 9. li; moral principle, 10. to tidy
up; to put in order, 11. grain; texture, 12. reason; logic; truth

DECALOGUE OF BEING: #310 = [#2, #4, #6, #23, #29, #34, #62, #81, #26,
#43]

[#2] {@1: Sup: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#2); Ego: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU
(#2)}
[#4, {@2: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#8); Ego: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#6)}
#6, {@3: Sup: 12 - YOUTHFULNESS: T'UNG (#20); Ego: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI
(#12)}
#23, {@4: Sup: 35 - GATHERING: LIEN (#55); Ego: 23 - EASE: YI (#35)}
#29, {@5: Sup: 64 - SINKING: CH'EN (#119 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED
{%35}); Ego: 29 - DECISIVENESS: TUAN (#64)}
#34, {@6: Sup: 17 - HOLDING BACK: JUAN (#136 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED
{%36}); Ego: 34 - KINSHIP: CH'IN (#98 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%24})}
#62, {@7: Sup: 79 - DIFFICULTIES: NAN (#215 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR
A DOER OF MISCHIEF {%34}); Ego: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#160)}
#81] {@8: Sup: 79 - DIFFICULTIES: NAN (#294); Ego: 81 - FOSTERING:
YANG (#241)}
[#26, {@9: Sup: 24 - JOY: LE (#318); Ego: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#267)}
#43] {@10: Sup: 67 - DARKENING: HUI (#385); Ego: 43 - ENCOUNTERS: YU
(#310)}

TELOS TOTAL: #310
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #215
DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #353

#2440 - MALE CHECKSUM TOTAL: #385 as [#200, #800, #500, #100, #70,
#50, #10, #200, #40, #70, #400] = sōphronismós (G4995): {UMBRA: #2240
% #41 = #26} 1) an admonishing or calling to soundness of mind, to
moderation and self-control; 2) self-control, moderation;

IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA MARGIN IDEA #310: "For since these do not
concern the generation of intuitions, as do the principles for
applying mathematics to natural science in general, but the connection
of their existence in one experience, and since this connection can be
nothing [IDEA: #310] other than the determination of existence in time
according to necessary laws, under which alone the connection is
objectively valid and therefore is experience: it follows that the
proof does not refer to synthetic unity in the connection of things in
themselves, but of perceptions, and of these indeed not with respect
to their content, but to the determination of time and to the relation
of existence in time in accordance with universal laws. These
universal laws contain therefore the necessity of the determination of
existence in time in general (hence a priori according to a rule of
the understanding), if the empirical determination in relative time is
to be objectively valid, and therefore to be experience. For the
reader who is stuck in the long habit of taking experience to be a
mere empirical combining of perceptions – and who therefore never even
considered that it extends much further than these reach, that is,
that it gives to empirical judgments universal validity and to do so
requires a pure unity of the understanding that precedes a priori – I
cannot adduce more here, these being prolegomena, except only to
recommend: to heed well this distinction of experience from a mere
aggregate of perceptions, and to judge the mode of proof from this
standpoint." [pages 60, 61]

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&glyph:情>

xīn qíng (心情): mood, frame of mind

[#65, #69, #80]

qíng (情): 1. feeling; emotion; mood, 2. passion; affection, 3.
friendship; kindness, 4. face; honor, 5. condition; state; situation,
6. relating to male-female relations, 7. obviously; clearly

[#2, {@1: Sup: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#2); Ego: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU
(#2)}
#4, {@2: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#8); Ego: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#6)}
#6, {@3: Sup: 12 - YOUTHFULNESS: T'UNG (#20); Ego: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI
(#12)}
#23, {@4: Sup: 35 - GATHERING: LIEN (#55); Ego: 23 - EASE: YI (#35)}
#29, {@5: Sup: 64 - SINKING: CH'EN (#119 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED
{%35}); Ego: 29 - DECISIVENESS: TUAN (#64)}
#34, {@6: Sup: 17 - HOLDING BACK: JUAN (#136 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED
{%36}); Ego: 34 - KINSHIP: CH'IN (#98 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%24})}
#62, {@7: Sup: 79 - DIFFICULTIES: NAN (#215 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR
A DOER OF MISCHIEF {%34}); Ego: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#160)}
#81, {@8: Sup: 79 - DIFFICULTIES: NAN (#294); Ego: 81 - FOSTERING:
YANG (#241)}
#26, {@9: Sup: 24 - JOY: LE (#318); Ego: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#267)}
#43, {@10: Sup: 67 - DARKENING: HUI (#385); Ego: 43 - ENCOUNTERS: YU
(#310)}
#65, {@11: Sup: 51 - CONSTANCY: CH'ANG (#436); Ego: 65 - INNER: NEI
(#375)}
#69, {@12: Sup: 39 - RESIDENCE: CHU (#475); Ego: 69 - EXHAUSTION:
CH'IUNG (#444)}
#80] {@13: Sup: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#513); Ego: 80 - LABOURING:
CH'IN (#524)}

TELOS TOTAL: #524
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #215
DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #353

#1256 - MALE CHECKSUM TOTAL: #513 as [#7, #800, #70, #80, #70, #10,
#8, #200, #1, #10] = zōopoiéō (G2227): {UMBRA: #1842 % #41 = #38} 1)
to produce alive, begat or bear living young; 2) to cause to live,
make alive, give life; 2a) by spiritual power to arouse and
invigorate; 2b) to restore to life; 2c) to give increase of life: thus
of physical life; 2d) of the spirit, quickening as respects the
spirit, endued with new and greater powers of life; 3) metaph., of
seeds quickened into life, i.e. germinating, springing up, growing;

#1253 - FEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #524 as [#80, #30, #8, #100, #70, #400,
#40, #5, #50, #70, #400] = plēróō (G4137): {UMBRA: #1088 % #41 = #22}
1) to make full, to fill up, i.e. to fill to the full; 1a) to cause to
abound, to furnish or supply liberally; 1a1) I abound, I am liberally
supplied; 1b) to render full, i.e. to complete; 1b1) to fill to the
top: so that nothing shall be wanting to full measure, fill to the
brim; 1b2) to consummate: a number; i) to make complete in every
particular, to render perfect; ii) to carry through to the end, to
accomplish, carry out, (some undertaking); 1b3) to carry into effect,
bring to realisation, realise; i) of matters of duty: to perform,
execute; ii) of sayings, promises, prophecies, to bring to pass,
ratify, accomplish; iii) to fulfil, i.e. to cause God's will (as made
known in the law) to be obeyed as it should be, and God's promises
(given through the prophets) to receive fulfilment;

#1739 - FEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #524 as [#200, #400, #50, #70, #10, #20,
#70, #4, #70, #40, #5, #800] = synoikodoméō (G4925): {UMBRA: #1739 %
#41 = #17} 1) to build together; 1a) to build together or with others;
1b) to put together or construct by building, out of several things to
build up one whole; 1b1) of the human body;

IS THIS THEN AS #73 - COMPLETION (CH'ENG) THE #451 - PRAXIS OF
RATIONALITY DRIVER FOR ACTION: #524 = [#2, #4, #6, #23, #29, #34, #62,
#81, #26, #43, #65, #69, #80]

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&tetra:73>

#64 - MALE CHECKSUM TOTAL: #227 as [#50, #5, #3, #6] /
#504 - FEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #180 as [#40, #50, #5, #3, #6, #400] /
#504 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #284 as [#40, #50, #5, #3, #6, #400] =
nâhag (H5090): {UMBRA: #58 % #41 = #17} 1) to drive, lead, guide,
conduct; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to drive, lead on, drive away, drive off;
1a2) to behave itself (fig.) (of *heart*); 1b) (Piel); 1b1) to drive
away, lead off; 1b2) to lead on, guide, guide on; 1b3) to cause to
drive; 1c) (Piel) to moan, lament;

YOUTUBE: "Doctor Who Human Nature Scene 10"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZp7XUrxlyk>
On 1/5/2024 12:51, dolf wrote:

A difficulty which we soon encountered with the Savvy.sha256 (...)
hash method so as to determine if there is any disparity of content,
occurs due to the idiosyncatic nature of the d3.classed () function
having a residual effect of the class attribute name remaining within
the <div data-vevent...> even though no relevant class such as
"NOTACTIVE" is specified. Which then requires ourselves to replciate
that condition .classed ("NOTACTIVE", true) / .classed ("NOTACTIVE",
false) at the time of vEvent creation.

Secondly because the sessions [[..]] array of arrays is increasingly
becoming more complex and so as to make future software maintenance
more comprehesible, we've sematically evolved the sessions [{...}]
array of objects, by which means we can name attribute specifc fields.

Suffice to say, we've reached the point in our coding where we're
determining if the INFO nodes exist in the sessions [] array and
whether the content has changed form.

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)