• Re: Republicans vote against medals to Capitol Police Who Shoot Unarmed

    From Crowder@21:1/5 to Gronk on Mon Feb 7 08:42:08 2022
    XPost: alt.politics.obama, alt.politics.republicans, talk.politics.guns
    XPost: talk.politics.misc

    In article <stq6lf$1oqbl$3@news.mixmin.net>
    Gronk <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
    On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 22:22:38 -0700, Gronk <invalid@invalid.invalid>
    wrote:

    Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
    On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:29:40 -0700, Gronk <invalid@invalid.invalid>
    wrote:

    Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
    On Tue, 4 Jan 2022 13:54:31 -0700, Gronk <invalid@invalid.invalid> >>>>> wrote:

    bigdog wrote:
    On Friday, December 3, 2021 at 12:43:53 AM UTC-5, Gronk wrote: >>>>>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
    On Tue, 16 Nov 2021 14:02:22 -0700, Gronk <inv...@invalid.invalid> >>>>>>>>> wrote:

    bigdog wrote:
    The kid did nothing more than act in self defense against three >>>>>> people who were attempting to kill him or do great bodily harm. If he >>>>>> hadn't done what he did, he might very well be dead. But those facts don't
    matter to the left wing mob, the MSM, or the politically motivated DA's
    office in Kenosha. They want their pound of flesh and if they can't get it
    in the courtroom, they will resort to a virtual lynching of Kyle >>>>>> Rittenhouse on TV and in print. These people are vile.


    He crosses state lines, is underage, someone gets a gun for him, his mom
    didn't know where he was, he wandered around waving his bang bang, and
    he's a victim?

    HOLY SHIT!!!!

    HIS MOM DIDN'T KNOW WHERE HE WAS?!?!?!

    [chuckle]

    He was underage, crossing state lines with a gun and kills people. Poor
    parenting.

    Being underage is not a crime.
    Crossing state lines is not a crime.
    Carrying a long gun is not a crime.
    Killing people in self defense is not a crime.

    Gronk just went 0 for 4.

    Militia Boy brought this all about by wanting to play militia and run down
    the streets with
    a bang bang. He had no sense or business doing any of this.

    The cool thing is YOU don't get to decide that.

    LOL

    "that guy needed shooting" - your words LOL

    They did.


    No trial or courts need, eh kamerad?

    Correct.

    Incorrect, kamerad.

    Yes, you are incorrect.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Crowder@21:1/5 to Gronk on Mon Feb 7 08:16:51 2022
    XPost: alt.politics.obama, alt.politics.republicans, talk.politics.guns
    XPost: talk.politics.misc

    In article <stq5q1$1oo0g$1@news.mixmin.net>
    Gronk <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
    On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 22:13:32 -0700, Gronk <invalid@invalid.invalid>
    wrote:
    Really? No trial or anything? Jawohl!

    So if you're being attacked by someone you beg them for a trial, do
    ya?

    ROFLMAO

    That's correct, dumb shit. No trial. You have a problem with that?

    Then STAY HOME and don't loot and burn and attack people.

    "that guy needed shooting" - courts and juries decide these things.

    Well, no, they don't.

    Yes they do, kamerad.

    Cite a case.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Crowder@21:1/5 to Gronk on Mon Feb 7 09:22:34 2022
    XPost: alt.politics.obama, alt.politics.republicans, talk.politics.guns
    XPost: talk.politics.misc

    In article <stq6he$1oqbl$2@news.mixmin.net>
    Gronk <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    bigdog wrote:
    On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 12:26:41 AM UTC-5, Gronk wrote:
    Scout wrote:


    "Gronk" <inv...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
    news:ssdij0$251v8$1...@news.mixmin.net...
    Scout wrote:


    "Gronk" <inv...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
    news:sri8vl$3rmm5$4...@news.mixmin.net...
    Scout wrote:


    "Gronk" <inv...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
    news:sr2cdt$25i2s$1...@news.mixmin.net...
    Scout wrote:


    "Gronk" <inv...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
    news:spmgpf$1n4pf$8...@news.mixmin.net...
    bigdog wrote:
    On Friday, December 3, 2021 at 12:43:53 AM UTC-5, Gronk wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
    On Tue, 16 Nov 2021 14:02:22 -0700, Gronk <inv...@invalid.invalid>
    wrote:

    bigdog wrote:
    The kid did nothing more than act in self defense against >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> three people who were attempting to kill him or do great >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bodily harm. If he hadn't done what he did, he might very >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well be dead. But those facts don't matter to the left wing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mob, the MSM, or the politically motivated DA's office in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kenosha. They want their pound of flesh and if they can't get >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it in the courtroom, they will resort to a virtual lynching >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of Kyle Rittenhouse on TV and in print. These people are vile.


    He crosses state lines, is underage, someone gets a gun for >>>>>>>>>>>>>> him, his mom
    didn't know where he was, he wandered around waving his bang >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bang, and
    he's a victim?

    HOLY SHIT!!!!

    HIS MOM DIDN'T KNOW WHERE HE WAS?!?!?!

    [chuckle]

    He was underage, crossing state lines with a gun and kills >>>>>>>>>>>> people. Poor
    parenting.

    Being underage is not a crime.
    Crossing state lines is not a crime.
    Carrying a long gun is not a crime.
    Killing people in self defense is not a crime.

    Gronk just went 0 for 4.

    Militia Boy brought this all about by wanting to play militia and >>>>>>>>>> run down the streets with
    a bang bang. He had no sense or business doing any of this. >>>>>>>>>
    Not illegal.

    A dangerous situation and his panic fire proves this. It's a wonder >>>>>>>> more weren't killed by him.

    If that was panic fire, I would love to see how good he is when he >>>>>>> takes his time....

    He didn't need to fire at all.

    The jury felt otherwise, as do most rational people.


    He paniced.

    If that's panic, I would hate to see what he's capable of when cool and >>>>> collected.

    He could have use his bang bang
    in other ways

    Such as? Oh, and make sure your answers are legal options.

    Here, it's in Russian, just your style:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=afhtMYkbKL0

    "Hand to Hand Combat With Assault Rifle"

    Training anyone?

    It's far easier to simply pull the trigger, and just as legal....
    Not if alternatives exist, and they did - if one was trained...

    Ask Joseph Rosenbaum and Anthony Huber how well trained Kyle was. Oh, wait. You can't.
    Never mind.

    Militia Boy needed multiple rounds and could easily have run away instead...

    Run away while armed and be attacked from behind?

    Would you do that?

    If you answer yes you're a pussy.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)