• A Critical Reassessment of the Anthropogenic =?UTF-8?B?Q0/igoItR2xvYmFs

    From Nick@21:1/5 to All on Sun Mar 23 21:32:02 2025
    A Critical Reassessment of the Anthropogenic CO₂-Global Warming
    Hypothesis: Empirical Evidence Contradicts IPCC Models and Solar Forcing Assumptions

    https://scienceofclimatechange.org/wp-content/uploads/SCC-Grok-3-Review-V5-1.pdf

    Abstract

    The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) attributes observed climate variability primarily to anthropogenic CO₂ emissions, asserting
    that these emissions have driven approximately 1 Wm⁻² of net radiative forcing since 1750, resulting in a global temperature rise of 0.8-
    1.1°C. This conclusion relies heavily on adjusted datasets and outputs
    from global climate models (GCMs) within the Coupled Model
    Intercomparison Project (CMIP) framework. However, this study conducts a rigorous evaluation of these assertions by juxtaposing them against
    unadjusted observational data and synthesizing findings from recent peer- reviewed literature. Our analysis reveals that human CO₂ emissions, constituting a mere 4% of the annual carbon cycle, are dwarfed by natural fluxes, with isotopic signatures and residence time data indicating
    negligible longterm atmospheric retention. Moreover, individual CMIP3 (2005-2006), CMIP5 (2010-2014), and CMIP6 (2013-2016) model runs
    consistently fail to replicate observed temperature trajectories and sea
    ice extent trends, exhibiting correlations (R²) near zero when compared
    to unadjusted records. A critical flaw emerges in the IPCC’s reliance on
    a single, low-variability Total Solar Irradiance (TSI) reconstruction,
    despite the existence of 27 viable alternatives, where higher-variability options align closely with observed warming—itself exaggerated by data adjustments.

    We conclude that the anthropogenic CO₂-Global Warming hypothesis lacks empirical substantiation, overshadowed by natural drivers such as
    temperature feedbacks and solar variability, necessitating a fundamental reevaluation of current climate paradigms.

    Keywords: Global warming; climate change; climate modeling; atmospheric
    CO2; residence time; future CO2 scenarios; IPCC; total solar irradiance
    (TSI)

    Submitted 2025-03-06, Accepted 2025-03-18. https://doi.org/10.53234/ SCC202501/06

    Май всички твърдения на неолиберализма започват да се опровергават ;)

    --
    «地 球 誕 生 在 牛 市 的 小 時 — Earth is born in the Bull's hour»

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)