Forum: >>> Magnum BBS <<<

Re: YOU WANTED TO KNOW WHY??? *** THIS IS WHY!!!*** (3/5)

From dolf@21:1/5 to dolf on Mon Apr 17 18:03:44 2023

[continued from previous message]

http://www.ifz-muenchen.de/heftarchiv/1968_4.pdf

<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
On 4/9/2023 12:34 AM, dolf wrote:
 
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: #007cff;">My dear countrymen
and women! We are quite used to being generally
 
referred to as monsters. And we are considered particularly
monstrous
 
because, in a question that certain gentlemen in Germany are
nervous
 
about, we are marching at the head – namely in the question of the
 
opposition to the Jews.
 
 
Our people understand many things but this one problem nobody
wants to
 
understand, and in particular because, as a worker explained:
“What
 
connection is there at all between the workers and the Jewish
Problem,
 
when in reality most of the people have no idea what this problem
 
means.” Most people let themselves be guided by feelings and say:
“I
 
have seen good and bad people among them, just like among
ourselves.”
 
 
Very few have learned to view the problem free of emotion, in its
 
clean form. I will at once begin with the word “work”.
 
 
 What does it mean – work?
 
 
Work is an activity performed not of one’s free will, but for the
sake
 
of one’s fellowmen. If there is a difference between man and
animals,
 
so it is particularly regarding work, which does not originate in
an
 
instinct but comes from an understanding of a necessity. Hardly
any
 
revolution had so deep an effect as the slow one which gradually
 
transformed the lazy man of primeval time into the man who works.
 
 
 Talking of work, we can assume that this activity followed these
 
three phases:
 
 
First, it was an effect of a simple instinct of self-preservation
 
which we also see in animals. Later, it developed into the second
form
 
of work – the one from pure egoism. Also this form became
gradually
 
replaced by the third: Work out of ethical sense of duty, where an
 
individual does not work because he is forced to it. We see it at
 
every turn. Millions of people work without being constantly
forced to
 
it. Thousands of intellectuals are sometimes bound to their
studies
 
for whole nights on end, day after day, although they may not do
it
 
for material gains. The hundreds of thousands of German workers
after
 
the end of their work tend their gardens. And, generally, we see
today
 
that millions of people cannot imagine living without some sort of
 
occupation.
 
 
When I said that this process represents a slow but perhaps also
the
 
greatest of all revolutions in human history, then one must assume
 
that also this revolution had to have a cause, and this cause was
the
 
greatest Goddess of this Earth, the one who is able to whip men to
the
 
uttermost – the Goddess of Hardship.
 
 
We can see this hardship in early prehistory, above all in the
 
northern part of the world, in those enormous ice deserts where
only
 
the meagrest existence was possible. Here, men were forced to
fight
 
for their existence, for things which were, in the smiling South,
 
available without work, and in abundance. In those times man made
 
perhaps his first groundbreaking discovery: In those cold
stretches
 
man was forced to find a substitute for the only gift of Heaven
which
 
makes life possible – the Sun. And the man who produced the first
 
artificial sparks later appeared to Humanity as a god –
Prometheus,
 
the fire-bringer. The North forced men to further activity –
 
production of clothes, building of abodes. First, it was simple
caves,
 
later huts and houses. In short, he created a principle, the
principle
 
of work. Life would not have been possible without it.
 
 
Although work was still simple, it had already to be planned
 
beforehand and each individual knew that if he has not done his
part,
 
he will die of hunger in the coming winter. At the same time
another
 
development followed – the terrible hardship became a means for
 
breeding of a race. Whoever was weak or sickly could not survive
the
 
terrible winter period and died prematurely. What remained was a
race
 
of strong and healthy giants. Yet another trait of this race was
born.
 
Where man is externally muzzled, where his radius of action is
 
limited, he begins to develop internally. Externally limited,
 
internally he becomes unlimited. The more man, due to external
forces,
 
must depend on himself, the deeper internal life he develops and
the
 
more he turns inward.
 
 
 These three achievements: The recognized principle of work as a
duty,
 
the necessity, not only out of egoism but for preservation of the
 
whole group of people – a small clan; second – the necessity of
bodily
 
health and thereby also of normal mental health; and third – the
deep
 
spiritual life. All these gave the northern races the ability to
go to
 
the world and build states.
 
 
If this power could not find its full expression in the high
North, it
 
became apparent when the ice shackles fell and man turned south to
the
 
happier, freer nature. We know that all these northern peoples had
one
 
symbol in common – the symbol of the Sun. They created cults of
Light
 
and they’ve created the symbols of the tools for making fire – the
 
drill and the cross. You will find this cross as a Hakenkreuz as
far
 
as India and Japan, carved in the temple pillars. It is the
Swastika,
 
which was once a sign of established communities of Aryan Culture.
 
 
 
Those races, today called Aryans, created all the great cultures
of
 
the ancient world. We know that Egypt was brought upon its high
 
cultural level by Aryan immigrants. Similarly, Persia and Greece;
the
 
immigrants were blond, blue eyed Aryans. And we know that outside
of
 
these Aryan states no civilized states have been founded. There
 
emerged mixed races between the black, dark eyed and dark colored,
 
southern races and the immigrants, but they failed to create any
 
large, creative culture states.
 
 
Why is it that only Aryans possessed the ability to create states?
It
 
was due, almost exclusively, to their attitude toward work. Those
 
races which, as the first, stopped seeing work as the result of
 
coercion and saw it rather as a necessity born out of hundreds of
 
thousands of years of hardship, had to become superior to other
 
people. And, besides, it was work that made people come together
and
 
divide the work among them. We know that the moment the individual
 
work to sustain oneself turned into work within communities, the
 
community tended to assign a particular work to those particularly
 
talented, and with increasing division of work it became necessary
for
 
still greater joining together into still bigger groups. So, it is
 
work which created kinships at first, later tribes, and still
later,
 
led to the creation of states.
 
 
If we see, as the first prerequisite for creating states, the
 
conception of work as social duty, so the second necessary
ingredient
 
is racial health and purity. And nothing helped the northern
 
conquerors more against the lazy and rotten southern races than
the
 
refined strength of their race.
 
 
States would remain an empty vessel if not decorated with that
which
 
we normally call culture. If we removed everything and kept just
 
railways, ships, etc.; if we removed everything we consider art
and
 
sciences, such a state would in reality become empty and we would
 
understand the creative power of the northern tribes. The moment
their
 
great, inborn imagination could act in great, free areas, it
created
 
everywhere immortal works. We see this process repeated
continuously
 
even in the smallest scale. Similarly, we know that great minds
are
 
often born at the bottom of society, unable to develop there but,
 
given an opportunity, they begin to grow and become leaders in
arts,
 
sciences, and also in politics.
 
 
We know today that there are extensive interrelations between the
 
state, nation, culture, art and work and it would be madness to
think
 
that any of them could exist independently of the others. Let us
take
 
art – considered as an international domain – and we shall see
that it
 
is unconditionally dependent on the state. Art blossomed in those
 
areas where the political development made it possible. The art of
 
Greece reached its highest level when the young state had
triumphed
 
over invading Persian armies. Construction of the Acropolis began
at
 
that time. Rome became the city of art after the end of the Punic
 
Wars, and Germany built her cathedrals, as in Worms, Speyer and
 
Limburg, when the German Empire under Salians had achieved its
 
greatest triumphs. We can follow this connection to our time. We
know
 
that art, for example the beauty of German towns, always depended
on
 
political development of these towns; that it was political
 
considerations which moved Napoleon III to regulating of the
 
Boulevards and Friedrich the Great to establishing Unter den
Linden.
 
Similarly in Munich where it was obvious that the city could not
 
become an industrial center and so art was chosen to elevate the
rank
 
of the city, which now everyone who wants to get to know Germany
must
 
visit. Similar were the origins of today’s Wien (Vienna).
 
 
The case was similar with other arts. The moment the small,
powerless
 
statelets began to unite into one state, then also one German art,
 
proud of itself, began to grow. The works of Richard Wagner
appeared
 
in the period when shame and powerlessness were replaced by a
unified,
 
great German Reich.
 
 
And so, not just art is dependent on the state, on the politics of
the
 
state; the same is the case with work itself because only a sound
 
state is in the position to give the opportunity of working to its
 
citizens and let them use their talents. The opposite is the case
with
 
the race in relation to everything else. A state with a rotten,
sick
 
and unsound race will never produce great works of art or make
great
 
politics, or at least bask in abundance. Each of these factors
depends
 
on the others. And only when all of them complement each other,
can we
 
say: There is harmony in the state, the way we Germanics
understand
 
it.
 
 
Can the Jew build a state?
 
 
Now we have to ask ourselves the question: How about the Jew as a
 
state builder? Does the Jew possess the power to create a state?
First
 
we must examine his attitude to work, find out how he perceives
the
 
principle of work, and excuse me if I now take a book called The
 
Bible. I am not claiming that all its contents are necessarily
true,
 
as we know that Jewry was very liberal in writing it. One thing,
 
however, is certain: it has not been written by an antisemite.
 
(Laughter) It is very important because no antisemite would have
been
 
able to write a more terrible indictment against the Jewish race
than
 
the Bible, the Old Testament. Let us take a look at a sentence:
“By
 
the sweat of thy brow shalt thou eat bread.” And it says that it
was
 
to be a punishment for the Fall of Man.
 
 
Ladies and Gentlemen! Already here we see that the whole world
lies
 
between us; we could never conceive of work as a punishment –
 
otherwise we would all have been convicts. We do not want to
conceive
 
of work as punishment. I must confess: I would not have been able
to
 
exist without work, and hundreds of thousands and millions would
have
 
been able to withstand perhaps 3 or 5 days, maybe even 10, but not
90
 
or 100 days without any activity. If Paradise really existed, the
Land
 
of Plenty, then our people would have been unhappy in it. (Calls:
 
Hear, hear) We Germans seek constantly a possibility to do
something
 
and if we cannot find anything, at least from time to time we hit
one
 
another in the face. (Laughter) We are unable to bear absolute
rest.
 
 
Thus we see, already here, a big difference. Because a Jew has
written
 
this, true or not is unimportant because it still reflects the
opinion
 
which Jewry has about work. For them work is not an obvious
ethical
 
duty but at most a means to sustenance. In our eyes, this is not
work
 
because in this case any activity serving self-preservation,
without
 
regard to fellow men, might be called work. And we know that this
 
work, in the past, consisted of plundering of caravans, and today
in
 
planned plundering of indebted farmers, industrialists and
workers.
 
The form has changed but the principle is the same. We do not call
it
 
work, but robbery. (Calls: Hear, hear)
 
 
When already such a basic notion separates us, here comes another.
I
 
have already explained that in the long period in the North the
races
 
became purified. This means that all the inferior and weak
gradually
 
died out and only the soundest remained. Also, here the Jew
differs
 
from us because he has not become purified but instead practiced
 
inbreeding; he multiplied greatly but only in narrow circles, and
 
without selection. And therefore we see a generation which is
plagued
 
by defects caused by inbreeding.
 
 
Finally, the Jew does not possess the third factor: The inner
 
spiritual life. I do not need to explain here what a Jew generally
 
looks like. You all know him. (Laughter) You know his constant
 
restlessness that never gives him a possibility to concentrate and
 
have a spiritual experience. In the most solemn moments he
flickers
 
his eyes and one can see that even during the most beautiful opera
he
 
is calculating dividends. (Laughter) The Jew has never had his own
 
art. (Hear, hear) His own temple has been built by foreign
builders:
 
The first was the Assyrians, and for the building of the second –
the
 
Roman artists. He has not left anything which might be called art,
no
 
buildings, nothing. In music, we know that he is only able to
 
skillfully copy the others’ art. We shall not conceal that today
he
 
has many famous conductors whose fame he can thank the
well-organized
 
Jewish Press for. (Laughter)
 
 
When a nation does not possess these three traits, it is not able
to
 
create states. And that is true because throughout centuries the
Jew
 
was always a nomad. He has never had what we might call a state.
It’s
 
a mistake which is spreading widely today to say that Jerusalem
was a
 
capital of a Jewish state of a Jewish nation. On the one side,
there
 
was always a great chasm between the tribes of Judah and Caleb and
the
 
northern Israeli tribes, and only David, for the first time,
succeeded
 
in gradually bridging the chasm through the unitary cult of
Yahweh. We
 
know precisely that this cult has at a very late time chosen for
 
itself Jerusalem as its sole seat. Only from that moment have the
 
Jewish people gotten a center, like Berlin or New York or Warsaw
 
today. (Hear, hear) This was a town in which the Jew, thanks to
his
 
talents and traits, gradually achieved predominance, partly
through
 
the force of arms, partly through the “power of trombones.”
Besides,
 
the Jews, already in those times, lived as a parasite in the body
of
 
other peoples and it had to be so. Because a people which does not
 
want to work – the often hard work of building and maintaining a
state
 
– to work in mines, factories, in construction etc.; all this was
 
unpleasant to the Hebrew. Such a people will never establish a
state
 
but prefers to live in some other state where others work and he
acts
 
as an intermediary in business, a dealer in the best case, or in
good
 
German – a robber, a nomad who undertakes robbing raids just like
in
 
ancient times. (Lively bravo! and hand clapping)
 
 
And so we can now understand why the whole Zionist state and its
 
establishing is nothing but a comedy. Herr Chief Rabbi has now
said in
 
Jerusalem: “Establishment of this state is not the most important;
it
 
is far from certain if it will at all be possible.” However, it is
 
necessary that Jewry has this city as its spiritual headquarters
 
because Jewry “materially and in fact are the masters of several
 
states; we control them financially, economically and
politically.”
 
And so the Zionist state is going to be a harmless corn of sand in
the
 
eye. Efforts are made to explain that so and so many Jews have
been
 
found that want to go there as farmers, workers, even soldiers.
 
(Laughter) If these people really have this urge in themselves,
 
Germany today needs these ideal men as turf cutters and coal
miners;
 
they could take part in building our water power plants, our lakes
 
etc. but it does not occur to them. The whole Zionist state will
be
 
nothing else than the perfect high school for their international
 
criminals, and from there they will be directed. And every Jew
will,
 
of course, have immunity as a citizen of the Palestinian state
 
(Laughter) and he will of course keep our citizenship. But when
caught
 
red-handed, he will not be a German Jew any longer but a citizen
of
 
Palestine. (Laughter)
 
 
One can almost say that the Jew cannot help it because everything
 
stems from his race. He cannot do anything about it and, besides,
it
 
doesn’t matter whether he is good or bad for he must act according
to
 
the laws of his race, just as do members of our people. A Jew is
 
everywhere a Jew; consciously or unconsciously, he resolutely
 
represents the interests of his race.
 
 
Thus we can see the two great differences between races: Aryanism
 
means ethical perception of work and that which we today so often
hear
 
– socialism, community spirit, common good before own good. Jewry
 
means egoistic attitude to work and thereby mammonism and
materialism,
 
the opposite of socialism. (Hear, hear) And due to these traits,
which
 
he cannot ‘overstep’ as they are in his blood and, as he himself
 
admits, in these traits alone lays the necessity for the Jew to
behave
 
unconditionally as a destroyer of states. He cannot do otherwise,
 
whether he wants to or not. And thereby he is unable to create his
own
 
state because it requires a lot of social sense. He is only able
to
 
live as a parasite in the states of others. He lives as a race
amongst
 
other races, in a state within others states. And we can see very
 
precisely that when a race does not possess certain traits which
must
 
be hereditary, it not only cannot create a state but must act as a
 
destroyer, no matter if a given individual is good or evil.
 
 
The Jewish path of destruction
 
 
We can follow this fate of Jewry from the earliest prehistory. It
is
 
not important if there is truth in every word of the Bible. In
 
general, it gives us at least an extract of the history of Jewry.
We
 
see how the Jews present themselves because the Jew wrote these
words
 
quite innocuously. It did not appear to him as outrageous when a
race,
 
through cunning and deceit, invaded and despoiled other races, was
 
always finally expelled and, unoffended, sought to repeat the same
 
elsewhere. They pimped and haggled even when it came to their
ideals,
 
always ready to offer even their own families. We know that not
long
 
ago a gentleman was staying here, Sigmund Fraenkel, who has just
 
written that it is quite unjust to accuse Jews of a materialistic
 
spirit. One should only look at their sunny family life. However,
this
 
intimate family life did not prevent Grandfather Abraham from
pimping
 
off his own wife to the Pharaoh of Egypt in order to be able to do
 
business. (Laughter) As was the grandfather, so was the father and
so
 
were the sons who never neglected their business. And you can be
sure
 
that they are not neglecting the business even as we speak. Who
among
 
you was a soldier, he will remember Galicia or Poland: There, at
the
 
train stations, these Abrahams were everywhere. (Laughter and hand
 
clapping)
 
 
They penetrated into other races for millennia. And we know very
well
 
that wherever they stayed long enough symptoms of decay appeared
and
 
the peoples could do nothing else than to liberate themselves from
the
 
uninvited guest or to disappear themselves. Heavy plagues came
over
 
the nations, no less then ten in Egypt – the same plague we
experience
 
today firsthand – and finally the Egyptians lost their patience.
When
 
the chronicler describes that the Jews were suffering when they
 
finally left, we know differently, for as soon as they were out,
they
 
began to long after coming back. (Laughter) It seems that they did
not
 
have it so badly. On the other hand, if it’s true they had been
forced
 
to help build pyramids, it would mean today forcing them to earn
their
 
bread by working in our mines, stone quarries etc. And just as you
are
 
not going to see this race voluntarily do it, so there was nothing
 
left to the Egyptians but to force them. What hundreds of
thousands of
 
others do as a matter of course, means for the Jew another chapter
of
 
suffering and persecution.
 
 
Still later, the Jew was able to infiltrate the then soaring Roman
 
Empire. We can still see his traces in southern Italy. Already 250
 
years before Christ he was there in all places, and people began
to
 
avoid them. Already, then and there, he made the most important
 
decision and became a trader. From numerous Roman texts we know
that
 
he traded, like today, with everything from shoelaces to girls.
(Hear,
 
hear) And we know that the danger grew, and that the insurrection
 
after the murder of Julius Caesar was mainly fomented by the Jews.
 
 
The Jew knew even then how to make friends with the masters of the
 
Earth. Only when they became shaky in their rule, he suddenly
became a
 
populist and discovered his wide open heart for the needs of the
broad
 
masses. So it was in Rome, as we know. We know that the Jew used
 
Christianity, not out of love for Christ, but partly because he
knew
 
that this new religion questioned all earthly power and so it
became
 
an axe at the root of the Roman state, the state which was built
on
 
the authority of the public servant. And he became its chief
bearer
 
and propagator, without becoming a Christian – he couldn’t, he
 
remained a Jew, precisely as today when he, never stooping to the
 
level of worker, remains a master pretending to be a socialist.
 
(Bravo!) He did the same 2000 years ago, and we know that this new
 
Teaching was nothing else than a resurrection of the old truism
that
 
people in a state should have legal rights and, above all, that
equal
 
duties should give equal rights. This obvious Teaching was
gradually
 
turned against the Jew himself, as the similar Teaching of
socialism
 
has to turn on the Hebrew race today, its distorters and
corrupters.
 
We know that throughout the middle Ages the Jew infiltrated all
 
European states, behaving like a parasite, using new principles
and
 
ways which the people did not know then. And from a nomad he
became a
 
greedy and bloodthirsty robber of our time. And he went so far
that
 
people after people rebelled and attempted to shake him off.
 
 
We know it is untrue when people say that the Jew was forced to
this
 
activity; he could easily acquire land. And he did acquire land
but
 
not to work it but in order to use it as a trade object, just as
he
 
does today. Our forefathers were wiser; they knew that land was
holy
 
and they excluded the Jew from it, (Lively ovation) and if the Jew
 
ever had the intention to tend the land and build a state, he
could
 
easily have done so at the time when whole new continents were
 
discovered. He could easily have done it if only he used a small
part
 
of his power, craftiness, cunning, brutality and ruthlessness, as
well
 
as some of his financial resources. Because if this power was
 
sufficient to subdue whole peoples, it would have been more than
 
sufficient to build their own state. If only he had had the basic
 
condition for this, which is a will to work, but not in the sense
of
 
usurious trade but in the sense in which millions work in order to
 
keep a state going. Instead, we see him also today as a destroyer.
In
 
these days we see a great transformation: the Jew was once a Court
 
Jew, submissive to his master he knew how to make the master
pliable
 
in order to dominate his subjects. For this purpose he whetted the
 
appetites of these great men for unattainable things, extended the
 
credit and soon turned them into debtors. In this way he himself
got
 
power over peoples. And he played this game with the same cruelty
as,
 
a few years later, the humanistic and philanthropic Jew whose
wealth
 
did not suffer at all when he showed his humanitarianism and his
 
spirit of sacrifice to our people. (Big laughter) I said that he
 
transformed from Court Jew (Hofjude) to Populist Jew (Volksjude).
Why?
 
Because he felt that the ground began to burn under his feet.
 
 
The ethical duty to work
 
 
Gradually, he also had to lead an existential struggle against the
 

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Who's Online
Recent Visitors
- Ian Rihard Kosednar
  Mon Jun 23 17:19:07 2025
  from No via SSH
- Bob Worm
  Mon Jun 23 13:40:10 2025
  from Wales, Uk via Telnet
- Plume
  Mon Jun 23 10:43:22 2025
  from Uk via Telnet
- Plume
  Mon Jun 23 10:20:22 2025
  from Uk via Telnet
- Centurion
  Mon Jun 23 09:46:15 2025
  from Berea, Ohio via Telnet
- Gwylbert
  Mon Jun 23 09:00:34 2025
  from Sydney, Nsw via Telnet
- Centurion
  Mon Jun 23 02:07:35 2025
  from Berea, Ohio via Telnet
- Bob Worm
  Sun Jun 22 21:19:20 2025
  from Wales, Uk via Telnet

System Info

Sysop:	Keyop
Location:	Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK
Users:	498
Nodes:	16 (2 / 14)
Uptime:	24:44:23
Calls:	9,828
Calls today:	7
Files:	13,761
Messages:	6,192,010

Re: YOU WANTED TO KNOW WHY??? *** THIS IS WHY!!!*** (3/5)

Who's Online

Recent Visitors

System Info

Re: YOU WANTED TO KNOW WHY??? * THIS IS WHY!!!* (3/5)