• Re: The Tragic Absurdity of Bidens Gaza Policies

    From Skeeter@21:1/5 to All on Fri Mar 29 11:56:43 2024
    XPost: alt.atheism, can.politics, alt.politics.democrats.d
    XPost: alt.food.fast-food

    In article <uu58u1$3ueu3$1@dont-email.me>, Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com
    says...

    On 3/28/2024 7:44 PM, NefeshBarYochai wrote:
    by JACK MIRKINSON

    Since Israel?s campaign of death began, President Joe Biden has
    perfected the art of cognitive dissonance, planting story after story
    about his ever-increasing ?frustration? with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu while continuing to send Israel the bombs it is
    using against the people of Gaza. But the past seven days have taken
    this absurdity to new levels. That?s because this was the week when we
    saw both Biden?s most dramatic attempts to appear to be radically
    shifting his approach and the most dramatic evidence of just how
    deeply the United States is helping to perpetuate this war.

    First, the attempts to telegraph that change is happening: Biden used
    his State of the Union address to announce that the United States
    would be building a pier off the Gaza coast so that it could deliver
    aid to the millions of people who are either being massacred or left
    to starve to death due to Israel?s unceasing bombardment and total
    siege of the region. He was then filmed telling Senator Michael Bennet
    that he was going to have a ?come to Jesus meeting? with Netanyahu,
    though he immediately undercut the seemingly accidental nature of the broadcast by adding, ?I?m on a hot mic here. Good.?

    On Saturday, Biden went further, telling MSNBC?s Jonathan Capehart
    that Netanyahu was ?hurting Israel more than helping Israel? and that
    an Israeli invasion of the southern Gaza city of Rafah, where 1.4
    million Palestinians are trapped, would be a ?red line.? All of this
    was enough to prompt some of the White House?s more sycophantic chroniclers, such as Axios reporter Barak Ravid, to proclaim that
    Biden was ?breaking? with Netanyahu.

    And it?s true that these moves could seem like an encouraging signal
    about his willingness to put some kind of pressure on Israel.

    But wait, what?s that sound? That would be the other shoe dropping.
    The most important news about the American handling of the war in the
    past week could be found not in any of the aforementioned, highly choreographed moments, but in a pair of reports on Tuesday in The Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal, in which the outlets
    revealed that not only has the United States been transferring vast
    amounts of weapons to Israel, but that it has been doing so in a way deliberately designed to evade public scrutiny.

    According to the reports, the US has approved more than 100 arms sales
    to Israel since October 7, constituting what the Journal called ?tens
    of thousands? of weapons. But the Biden administration has revealed
    only two of those deals to Congress. The rest have been masked by one
    of the oldest shady financial tricks in the books, as the Post
    explained:

    [Th]e weapons transfers were processed without any public debate
    because each fell under a specific dollar amount that requires the executive branch to individually notify Congress, according to U.S. officials and lawmakers who, like others, spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive military matter.

    [?] ?That?s an extraordinary number of sales over the course of a
    pretty short amount of time, which really strongly suggests that the Israeli campaign would not be sustainable without this level of U.S. support,? said Jeremy Konyndyk, a former senior Biden administration official and current president of Refugees International.

    So let?s recap. Biden is publicly lamenting the scale of death in
    Gaza, going after Netanyahu, and pledging to build a maritime aid
    corridor to get around Israel?s siege. But Netanyahu?s ability to
    carry out that level of carnage, and impose such an inhumane siege, is dependent on the continued flow of weapons to Israel from the
    government headed by? Biden. Or, to put it more succinctly: The US government is now making elaborate plans to ameliorate a humanitarian catastrophe that would not exist without its own bombs.

    When you add the fact that Biden?s government is not only sending
    Israel weapons but is so eager to do so that it is purposefully
    skirting congressional oversight and public accountability, it all
    gets even more ludicrous. We?re no longer in a simple ?this makes no
    sense? situation. Instead, we?ve arrived at a Twilight Zone ?if I try
    to rationalize this, it will tear a hole in the fabric of space and
    time? situation. It?s as if you kept secretly handing an arsonist
    gasoline and matches, then showed up five minutes later with the firefighters, read out a statement about how unconscionable arson is,
    and announced that you were taking major steps to help the survivors.

    Things get more maddening when you look at the nature of the American
    aid effort. That pier Biden announced? The Pentagon says it could take
    up to two months to build. There is a famine happening right now in
    Gaza, not two months from now. And the US won?t even give assurances
    that Israel will be prevented from firing on Palestinians trying to retrieve American aid. There are other agencies on the ground, but the
    US is in the way there too. It has cut off funding to UNWRA, the main relief organization in Gaza, on dubious evidence that the UN now
    claims was based in part on evidence obtained through torture.

    These loopholes and contradictions have become so glaring that people
    you might normally expect to overlook them are unable to. A recent
    report in The New York Times, for instance, delicately noted that ?the United States finds itself on both sides of the war in a way, arming
    the Israelis while trying to care for those hurt as a result.? And Democratic Senator Chris Van Hollen told The New Yorker, ?I really
    haven?t heard a good response to the question of why we should not
    apply existing U.S. law?to insure that U.S. military assistance is
    used in accordance with our values.?

    Nobody has heard a good response?and that?s because there isn?t one!
    It?s shameless hypocrisy from Biden all the way down.



    As I already posted in alt.atheism, the so-called Holy Land will, in a century or two (perhaps in a few decades), be sea-bottom.

    What then??

    Dawn

    How do you know? The bible also says He will create a "new" world.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dhu on Gate@21:1/5 to Skeeter on Sat Mar 30 04:36:34 2024
    XPost: alt.atheism, can.politics, alt.politics

    On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 11:56:43 -0600, Skeeter wrote:


    As I already posted in alt.atheism, the so-called Holy Land will, in a
    century or two (perhaps in a few decades), be sea-bottom.

    What then??

    Dawn

    How do you know? The bible also says He will create a "new" world.

    Depends how far up the sea level rises. But it's likely to become
    an uninhabitable desert for a while with the climate warming up in
    any case. How're folks there gonna take it when David's spring
    dries up?

    Dhu

    --
    Je suis Canadien. Ce n'est pas Francais ou Anglais.
    C'est une esp`ece de sauvage: ne obliviscaris, vix ea nostra voco;-)
    Duncan Patton a Campbell

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)