On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 3:00:02 PM UTC-5, efbe...@gmx.com wrote:

On Sat, 27 May 2006 17:18:53 GMT, "princeandy" <an...@home.com> wrote:

"AnonMoos" <anon...@io.com> wrote in message
news:44787998...@io.com...

You certainly seem to be nostalgic for the crackdowns on "beard-trimming",
executions in soccer stadiums, and ban on female education of your beloved
Taliban, StriderCabal!

FIRST TAKE A LOOK AT CASUALTIES THAT ANYONE CAN EXAMINE THE RECORDS OF. >NOBODY HAS ASKED YOU TO TURN YOUR COUNTRY INSIDE OUT FOR THESE BY WAILING >ABOUT SYMPATHY.
Casualties in WW2
Not including the documented 5 million non Jewish in concentration camps >who far out numbered the suspected true number of Jewish victims. These are >figures any historian can examine and question for accuracy without fear of >imprisonment.

Soviet Union 25,568,000
China 11,324,000
Germany 7,060,000
Poland 6,850,000
Japan 1,806,000
Yugoslavia 1,700,000
Rumania 985,000
France 810,000
Austria 525,000
Italy 410,000
Great Britain 388,000
USA 295,000
Holland 250,000
Belgium 85,000
Finland 79,000
Canada 42,000
India 36,000
Australia 29,000
Albania 28,000
Spain 22,000
Bulgaria 21,000
New Zealand 12,000
Norway 10,000
South Africa 9,000
Luxembourg 5,000
Denmark 4,000
TOTAL 58,353,000

<trop...@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:1148596989....@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...

KANGAROOISTAN wrote:

Now why don't you type out a list of the muslime' s crimes
and post them here?

www.truthbeknown.com/victims.htm
www.1001inventions.com
www.muslimheritage.com
www.islamonline.com
www.islamicity.com

Islam psyops lies.

read this one: jihadwatch.org

Israeli stats
http://www.ifamericansknew.org/

Jews and Palestinians genetically similar. >http://www.khazaria.com/genetics/abstracts.html

War without end
http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=39590
Yes and you have no quarrel with the US?
They dont have to, they use their army to shoot, run over and mistreat >physically and sexually helpless children. What can a Palestinian do when >the mighty money contributing yanks cannot protect their citizens.

http://www.thenausea.com/elements/thenotforgotten/rachel/index.html

http://edition.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/03/16/rafah.death/ >http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/79400p-72974c.html
One guy gets 10 years, the other gets a raise and promotion??

http://www.nogw.com/israeliatrocities.html >http://www.palestinefacts.org/index.php >http://www.palestinechronicle.com/story-2003112917164320.htm

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/01AA7ECA-7018-447B-A10D-9E4139D4788A.
htm
American and Australian shot by Israelis
Chris McGreal talks to the relatives of three British and American victims >http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,2763,1066817,00.html

http://edition.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/03/16/rafah.death/ >http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,2763,1066817,00.html >http://www.rachelcorrie.org/ >http://www.thenausea.com/elements/thenotforgotten/rachel/index.html >http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,2763,916299,00.html >http://www.omjp.org/rachelphotos.html
Torture in Israel >http://thirdworldtraveler.com/Israel/IsraelsTortureBan.html >http://www.washington-report.org/backissues/0197/9701007.htm
Christian homes being knocked down??? >http://sf.indymedia.org/news/2003/05/1607911.php

(Wanderer, Oct. 12, 1989, p. 7; National Review, March 16, 1992, p. S-5).

Israeli soldiers can beat up a priest on the West Bank, then shoot up his >church during Mass, and only the Catholic press takes note...If Christians >had done such a thing to a synagogue, anywhere, it would have been >front-page news, everywhere. (Wanderer, Oct. 12, 1989, p. 7; National >Review, March 16, 1992, p. S-5).

Farmers harassed and shot in israel >http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3757004.stm >http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=53042

Zionist settler deliberately hits and kills Palestinian old man >http://www.palestine-info.co.uk/am/publish/article_3293.shtml >http://www.palestine-info.co.uk/am/publish/article_3396.shtml >http://judicial-inc.biz/School_shooting.htm

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.nationalism.white/msg/20deae4bed
c378ab?q=&rnum=1
In a letter to the conference host, UNESCO Director-General Koichiro >Matsuura,
the protesters said the Wiesenthal center, "under the deceitful cover of the
struggle against anti-Semitism, is on the contrary encouraging intolerance >and
racism in our societies."

Jon and David Kimche
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v13/v13n4p29_Weber.html
The SS was particularly enthusiastic in its support for Zionism. An internal
June 1934 SS position paper urged active and wide-ranging support for >Zionism by the government and the Party as the best way to encourage >emigration of Germany's Jews to Palestine.

The Israel Lobby John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt >http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n06/mear01_.html

http://www.nowar-paix.ca/nowar/forum/6973
HOW TO KEEP ACADEMICS QUIET
The Real Issue Is Israel's Human Rights Record:
A statement by Norman G. Finkelstein upon publication of Beyond Chutzpah

Professor Alan Dershowitz of Harvard University is currently best known for >his advocacy of the "most excruciating" torture against terrorist suspects >such as a "needle being shoved under the fingernails." The alleged purpose >of this torture is to extract a truthful confession but its real >consequence, as human rights organizations have pointed out, is to produce >whatever statements are necessary to end the suffering. For 15 months >Dershowitz has applied a variant of this truth-seeking technique -- less >physically painful but no less excruciating -- to prospective publishers of >Beyond Chutzpah, which offers a critical examination of Israel's human >rights record and Dershowitz's defense of it. Enlisting one of the most >powerful law firms in the country after his personal initiatives proved >unsuccessful, Dershowitz has repeatedly threatened to bankrupt highly >respected publishers with litigation if they didn't cancel publication of my
book. He could then proclaim that the cancellation confirmed the "truth" >that Beyond Chutzpah didn't meet scholarly standards.

Dershowitz justified these blackmail tactics on the ground that Beyond >Chutzpah libels him. Yet, when I first began to expose his gross scholarly >misconduct, Dershowitz publicly declared at UCLA (on 21 October 2003) that >he wouldn't respond with a libel action because he believed "so strongly in >the First Amendment and full freedom of speech." Ironically, just as he was >threatening my publishers with expensive and time-consuming lawsuits, >Dershowitz denounced Holocaust denier David Irving, who had sued Deborah >Lipstadt for libel, with these words: "Before Irving lost his case [against >Lipstadt], several publishers had refused to issue books critical of Irving,
out of fear of his bringing expensive and time-consuming lawsuits. That was >a chilling of free speech" (Afterword to Lipstadt's History on Trial; his >emphasis).

My publisher, University of California Press, was understandably at great >pains to fend off a potential lawsuit by Dershowitz; for an academic >publisher the associated costs would have been ruinous, to the point of >making certain victory meaningless. On occasion our relationship became >strained and at one point it appeared as if we had reached an impasse. >However, through the skillful mediation of Nation magazine senior editor >Roane Carey (who was the freelance editor of Beyond Chutzpah) and others, a >satisfactory compromise was reached that protected the interests of both >publisher and author, and, most importantly, preserved the integrity of the >book. I would like personally to extend my heartfelt thanks to all who >supported me and the press during this difficult period.

Well if some people feel that is a fine way to live and all your leaders >after leading you from disaster to disaster over the millenium and manage to
pass the buck handily across to the persecutor I would say it is time to >examine their credentials.

Especially as in the WWII case they actually used the tragedy to filter out >the people they did not want while having the easy out of blaming it all on >the nazis.
I mean you are self proclaimed the brightest of us all, so what cant you >understand , hell it is like privatisation, you no longer have a beef with >the government you are bucking some private company who only has to show a >profit. So you no longer have a beef with the zionists and can waste your >spleen on the nazis.

This is fine with utilities, but using it to choose who you want and who you
dont want!!

But when you are imposing your false values on us by jailing our historians,
where ever you have influence in the government use it to bring in your >corrupted values of torture as a legitimate tool for a government. Where you
use the freedom and non discrimination in our countries to simply look after
yourselves and keeping wailing about WWII as a reason , and asking us to >accept the unsupportable lies of WWII and put ourselves in jail because of >your transparent and selfserving lies I am not going to give support.

What you are claiming might be true, but the enemy is within our gates, I do
not want torture and big brother listening at my door, opening my mail and >giving me all sorts of problems . You are right here alongside me, and if i >am not familiar with your views it is because you lie to me about what you >believe democracy is.You lie to me about what you consider a governments >limits should be.
You lie to me about anything i ask you and skid of into the lie about the 6m
which i cannot verify without a deal of research and then that research only
shows you are lying for sympathy and support for impositions i would >otherwise tell you to f off .

You are in the gates with your lies, your barbaric modes of government that >you feel comfortable with to suit your zionist leaders. I do not like any of
it and if you came out and told me well i am just following my zionist >leaders i would tell you to f off.

So i dont care at the present about astrocities by arabs, as long as i >retain cony\trol in my country and can work to keep their shit out of my >country and in theirs.

But you are sitting in my country because you all like the freedom and >democracy we practise, and should support it fully, not simply sit back and >enjoy it but use it for your nefarious purposes.
You were in exactly the same position in germany prewar as you are now in >the western countries.

If you do not think enough to support the status quo because you appreciate >that such as it is , it is the best system around compared to any other. >But if like in germany you join any bunch of worldwide jews that decide to >declare war on us, dont look to me for support, as far as i am concerned you
are either with us, if for no other reason than we have acheived a fairly >comfortable way of living.

And I do not want my male relatives, sons or daughters brought into a war >just for you because you want a pat on the head from your leaders such as >they are, and are not satisfied with what you always claim to be looking >for freedom and no discrimination.

The Jews declared war against Germany
On March 24, 1933, the Jewish World Congress, then under the leadership of >Chaim Weizman, declared war on Germany on behalf of the Jews of the world. >http://www.corax.org/revisionism/misc/encampment.html

http://www.rense.com/general45/zzo.htm
The Zionist Jewish Role In - Causing World War II
"In 1941, a Jewish writer, Theodor N. Kaufman, wrote Germany Must Perish. >Kaufman set out a plan for the total destruction of the German population by
a very simple method: the mass sterilisation of all German men and women >between the age of puberty and sixty years."

From a pre-1993 edition of John Tyndall's Spearhead magazine
12-9-3

http://www.corax.org/revisionism/misc/encampment.html
Immediately after Japan declared war on the United States of America, the >order was issued to round up all Americans of Japanese ancestry and imprison
them in large camps. A declaration of war entitles any nation to imprison >its enemy and their sympathizers.
On March 24, 1933, the Jewish World Congress, then under the leadership of >Chaim Weizman, declared war on Germany on behalf of the Jews of the world. >The basic question arises; what were the Germans supposed to do with their >large Jewish population?

http://www.heretical.com/mkilliam/wwii.html
That second war was later made certain, not by the intentions of Hitler but >by the determination of his eternal enemies to destroy the new Germany that >he had created.
By the Treaty of Versailles on 28 June 1919 and the Treaty of St. Germain on
20 September of the same year, the German people were thoroughly humiliated.
The British Prime Minister, Lloyd George, wrote:
'The international bankers swept statesmen, politicians, journalists and >jurists all to one side and issued their orders with the imperiousness of >absolute monarchs.'

http://www.msnbc.com/news/606092.asp?0si=-&cp1=1
Who has said, America and Israel? I'll pick Israel every time. That is a guy
who was educated, worked in intelligence in the air force in America
ALIEN CONTROL
Is US like Germany of the '30s? Published on Friday, June 11, 2004 by the >Chicago Sun Times by Andrew Greeley >http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0611-10.htm

The Daily Mail reported on 10 July 1933:
'The German nation, moreover, was rapidly falling under the control of its >alien elements. In the last days of the pre-Hitler regime there were twenty >times as many Jewish government officials in Germany as had existed before >the war. Israelites of international attachments were insinuating themselves
into key positions in the German administrative machine.'
Resentment and resistance began to build up against the alien horde and in >the year before Adolf Hitler came to power Bernard Lecache, President of the
World Jewish League, stated:
'Germany is our public enemy number one. It is our object to declare war >without mercy against her.'
On that same day, 24 March 1933, on the front page of the London Daily >Express appeared the main headlines: "Judaea declares war on Germany: Jews >of all the world unite", and followed with:
'The Israelite people of the entire world declare economic and financial war
on Germany. The appearance of the Swastika as the symbol of the new Germany >revives the old war symbol of the Jews. Fourteen million Jews stand as one >body to declare war on Germany. The Jewish wholesale dealer leaves his >business, the banker his bank, the shopkeeper his shop, the beggar his >miserable hut in order to combine forces in the holy war against Hitler's >people.'
The German government was removing Jews from influential positions and >transferring power back to the German people. This declaration of war by the
Jews on Germany was repeated throughout the world. The first boycott of >Jewish business concerns came after this Jewish declaration of war in April >1933.

http://www.us-israel.org/jsource/Holocaust/stlouis.html

http://www.jewsagainstzionism.com/opposition/cannonfodder.htm
We implore and beseech our Jewish brethren to realize that the Zionists are >not the saviours of the Jewish People and guarantors of their safety, but >rather the instigators and original cause of Jewish suffering in the Holy >Land and worldwide.

http://www.aldeilis.net/zion/zionhol01.html

The Zionist Federation of Germany (ZVfD), an organisation representing a >tiny minority of German Jews, was selected by the Nazis as the body to >represent the Jews of the Reich.
The best example of this was the 'Transfer Agreement' of 1934. Immediately >after the Nazi takeover in 1933, Jews all over the world supported or were >organising a world wide boycott of German goods. This campaign hurt the Nazi
regime and the German authorities searched frantically for a way disabling >the boycott. It was clear that if Jews and Jewish organisations were to pull
out, the campaign would collapse.
This problem was solved by the ZVfD. A letter sent to the Nazi party as >early as 21.6.33, outlined the degree of agreement that existed between the >two organisations on the questions of race, nation, and the nature of the >'Jewish problem', and it offered to collaborate with the new regime:

In their eagerness to gain credence and the backing of the new regime, the >Zionist organisation managed to undermine the boycott. The main public act >was the signature of the 'Transfer Agreement' with the Nazi authorities >during the Zionist Congress of 1934. In essence, the agreement was designed >to get Germany's Jews out of the country and into Mandate Palestine. It >provided a possibility for Jews to take a sizeable part of their property >out of the country, through a transfer of German goods to Palestine. This >right was denied to Jews leaving for any other destination (emphasis - ED). >The Zionist Organisation was the acting agent, through its financial >organisations. This agreement operated on a number of fronts 'helping' Jews >to leave the country, breaking the ring of the boycott, exporting German >goods in large quantities to Palestine, and last but not least, enabling the
regime to be seen as humane and reasonable even towards its avowed enemies, >the Jews. After all, they argued, the Jews do not belong in Europe and now >the Jews come and agree with them.

After news of the agreement broke, the boycott was doomed. If the Zionist >Organisation found it possible and necessary to deal with the Nazis, and >import their goods, who could argue for a boycott? This was not the first >time that the interests of both movements were presented to the German >public as complementary. Baron Von Mildenstein, the first head of the Jewish
Department of the SS, later followed by Eichmann, was invited to travel to >Palestine. This he did in early 1933, in the company of a Zionist leader, >Kurt Tuchler. Having spent six months in Palestine, he wrote a series of >favourable articles in Der Sturmer describing the 'new Jew' of Zionism, a >Jew Nazis could accept and understand.

The declared enemy was now right in the middle of their country. Bankers, >industrialists, media moguls, movie producers, merchants, and others, >overnight became enemies of Germany.
No nation in the world would have allowed their declared enemies to freely >roam around the country. The Germans, however, never implemented measures >against the Jews as drastic as the United States did with their Japanese >citizens.

http://www.corax.org/revisionism/misc/encampment.html
On March 24, 1933, the Jewish World Congress, then under the leadership of >Chaim Weizman, declared war on Germany on behalf of the Jews of the world.

thousands of Jews were not bothered by the Nazis or by the fate of their >"convicted" co-religionists. They went on with their daily lives in Germany >while the world was running amok about the "harsh treatment of Jews in >Germany." To illustrate the true "fate of the Jews," one has to look at some
of the prominent Jewish leaders living in Germany at the time.
These are very important questions, because so many prominent Jews survived >the alleged Holocaust. Simon Wiesenthal, Eli Wiesel, Leo Baeck, Max >Nussbaum, and so many more like them. As a matter of fact, approximately 4.5
million Jews "survived."

Why did Rabbi Baeck never leave the Third Reich, the land of concentration >camps and "gas chambers," with all the other 300,000 German Jews who were >allowed to leave for more lucrative lands?

By all accounts, Rabbi Dr. Leo Baeck must have had a very comfortable >existence under the National Socialist Government in Germany. Born in 1873 >in Posen, he became a Rabbi in 1897 in Oppeln/Silesia. Interestingly, he was
a Rabbi in Berlin from 1912 until 1943, when he himself was interned at the >Theresienstadt camp, a camp where most of the prominent Jews and resistance >activists were housed. After the war Leo Baeck immigrated to England.

Why did Rabbi Baeck never leave the Third Reich, the land of concentration >camps and "gas chambers," with all the other 300,000 German Jews who were >allowed to leave for more lucrative lands?

Another question should be put to all those false Holocaust "experts" by >asking them how many Jews were gassed in Dachau? As a matter of fact, no one
was ever "gassed" in Germany, or in territories under German control, as has
been established in court

In Schuld und Schicksal (Guilt and Fate) Burg dealt with the Warsaw and Lodz
ghettos. When the German troops occupied Warsaw, they wanted to concentrate >the Jewish population. Real ghettos had been there for centuries but the >assimilated or emancipated Jews had lived far way from the ghettos. Now the >Germans wanted to have the Jews all together. In a practical sense, the >ghetto was also organized for the protection of the Jewish population. >(26-6885, 6886)
The Zionists were happy with this arrangement. An appointed Jewish Council >was the governing body of the ghetto. They had their own police, jails and >everything else. Naturally, there were some who were cruel. One of these was
the vice president of the police, who was later executed. In Burg's eyes, >this execution was evidence that Jews defended themselves against the >minority of Zionists who were using the majority of Jews for their own >purposes. (26-6886, 6887)

Then, when hundreds of thousands of civilians died in massive Allied bombing
raids against German civilians ... and only then ... Rabbi Baeck got out. >And where did he go? To Theresienstadt, because the concentration camp was >never bombed by the Allies, and was the safest place for a Jew to be.
Why did Rabbi Baeck never leave the Third Reich, the land of concentration >camps and "gas chambers," with all the other 300,000 German Jews who were >allowed to leave for more lucrative lands?
It must have been relatively easy to leave Germany. Max Nussbaum, Chief >Rabbi of Berlin until 1940 (who later became Chief Rabbi of Beverly Hills, >CA), immigrated to New York at the advice of Rabbi Stephen Wise. Did Rabbi >Wise already know of the coming war between the United States and Germany in
1940?
One must assume that Rabbi Baeck knew about Rabbi Nussbaum's plan to move to
New York, but again Baeck remained in Berlin. A riddle to be sure, unless >the horrors of Nazism were not that horrible for the Jews after all.
Ř > IS IT TRUE that in 1941 and again in 1942, the German Gestapo offered >all

European Jews transit to Spain, if they would relinquish all their >property
in Germany and Occupied France; on condition that:
a) none of the deportees travel from Spain to Palestine;<

HOW MUCH LONGER SHOULD WE PUT UP WITH A GOVERNMENT TRYING TO BE JEWISH AND >ADOPT THE JEWISH FAVORITES OF SUPPRESSION OF FREEDOM AND TORTURE.

YES THAT OFFER WAS MADE. THE JEWS CAN THANK THE ZIONISTS WHO DECLINED FOR >THEIR VARIOUS REASONS.
Under the guise of "love of Israel", the Zionist "statesmen" seduced many >Jews to replace devotion to the Torah and its Sages with devotion to the >scoundrel who founded Zionism >http://www.jewsnotzionists.org/tenquestions.htm
The Jewish Agency delegation headed by Golda Meir (Meirson) ignored a German
offer to allow Jews to emigrate to other countries for $250 a head, and the >other Jewish groups made no effort to influence the United States and the >32 other countries attending the conference to allow immigration of German >and Austrian Jews. >http://www.jews-for-allah.org/Jews-not-for-Judaism/Jews-who-helped-nazis-hit
ler.htm

The Jewish ghetto police always had the option, she said, of "throwing off >their uniforms and joining the rest of us" - a point that Yitzak Zuckerman, >a leader of the Warsaw ghetto uprising, made in his memoir. >http://www.theexperiment.org/articles.php?news_id=2139

Without Jewish co operation through the zionists the Germans would never >have had the resources to herd the Jews into the various camps. And the >zionists made it impossible for the underground to trust the jews.
Like elsewhere, the only people who had the information and the ear of the >frightened Jewish population were the Judenrat. In this case the Judenrat >comprised mainly the Zionist Federation members. Without their help the SS, >with 19 officers and less than 90 men, plus a few hundred Hungarian police, >could not have collected and controlled a million Jews, when they did not >even know their whereabouts. Kastner and the others were left under no >illusions. Eichmann told Joel Brand, one of the members of Kastner's >committee, that he intended to send all Hungary's Jews to Auschwitz, before >he even started the expulsions! He told them clearly that all these Jews >will die, 12,000 a day, unless certain conditions were met.

http://www.geocities.com/chabaan_2000/safad.HTM
Is The same authors also describe co-operation between Zionist leaders and >Eichmann. It is interesting to note that the extreme right-wing revisionists
only chose wealthy Jews for emigration, whereas other Zionists insisted on >taking only young and healthy Jews. Eichmann helped them to carry out these >plans, in return for which the Zionist Organization paid large sums to the >Nazis. As Kimche says about the Zionist delegates in Germany: They had not >come to Germany to save Jews. That was not their job. When the Nazis began >the systematic murder of Jews in 1941, the Zionists decided neither to >support Jewish resistance in Europe, nor to attack the Nazis, nor to say >anything about the mass liquidation of their fellow Jews. Their sole purpose
was to save certain selected Jews as future settlers in Palestine. They were
not interested in Jews who wished to stay in their home countries and fight >the Nazis.

"Kastner must be brought to trial as a Nazi collaborator. And at this >>trial, Kastner should defend himself as a private citizen, and not be >>defended by the Israeli Government..." (14 July 1955).

*Haboker*, the pro-Government General Zionist party paper stated:

"The public wants to know the real facts about Kastner, and not about >>him alone. The only way to find out the truth is to put all the Rescue >>Committee people on trial and give them a chance to offer their >>defense." (23 June 1955)

But public opinion was not quite unanimous. The problem with bringing >>Kastner and his associates to trial was that his associates were the >>Government of Israel.

As the evening paper *Yedi'ot Aharonot* said:

"If Kastner is brought to trial the entire government faces a total >>political and national collapse - as a result of what such a trial may
disclose." (23 June 1955)

Accordingly, the Government of Israel did not put Kastner on trial, >>instead it filed an appeal against the acquittal of Greenwald for criminal >>libel.

As Dr. Karlebach wrote in Israel's largest evening newspaper,
"Kastner must be brought to trial as a Nazi collaborator. And at this >>trial, Kastner should defend himself as a private citizen, and not be >>defended by the Israeli Government..." (14 July 1955).

*Haboker*, the pro-Government General Zionist party paper stated:

"The public wants to know the real facts about Kastner, and not about >>him alone. The only way to find out the truth is to put all the Rescue >>Committee people on trial and give them a chance to offer their >>defense." (23 June 1955)

But public opinion was not quite unanimous. The problem with bringing >>Kastner and his associates to trial was that his associates were the >>Government of Israel.

As the evening paper *Yedi'ot Aharonot* said:

"If Kastner is brought to trial the entire government faces a total >>political and national collapse - as a result of what such a trial may
disclose." (23 June 1955)

Accordingly, the Government of Israel did not put Kastner on trial, >>instead it filed an appeal against the acquittal of Greenwald for criminal >>libel.

Read the Red Cross reports. Go to the Red Cross museum, headquarters

in your city and pick up the records. Anyway theres a few independent
witnesses.
http://www.vho.org/GB/Books/dth/fndstats.html

http://www.libertyforum.org/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=news_international&Numbe

r=293321480
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/print.asp?ID=2735

http://www.rense.com/general69/factua.htm

Rassinier seems to wrap it up.
http://www.ihr.org/books/rassinier/debunking1-0.html

During World WarII, Rassinier was a highly decorated member of the French >Resistance. In October of 1943 he was arrested by the Gestapo for various >activities including the smuggling of Jewish refugees over the Franco-Swiss >border. http://www.codoh.com/thoughtcrimes/PORT1RAS.HTML

http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v19/v19n2_Letters.html
On July 13, 1994, a documentary on the life of Charles A. Lindbergh
broadcast on the Public Broadcast System (PBS - KENW-TV) said that when >> Lindbergh visited one of these few camps in Germany following WW2, he was >> told that 25,000 died in 1-1/2 years
http://history.acusd.edu/gen/WW2Timeline/lindbergh3.html

http://666ismoney.com/HolocaustAds.html
I, Raquel Baranow am a Grad Student of Holocaust Denial. There are persons >with PhD's in various fields who
also deny the 6 million canard. The best evidence is forensic. Until >recently, there was never a forensic
examination of the alleged murder weapon (gas chambers). Demographic figures
are incomplete. After the fall
of East Europe to communism, many of the millions of Jews who fled Poland >into the Soviet Union or ended up
behind the Iron Curtain changed their names to assimilate, many civilians >died in the war, many died in the

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)