• Re: Nothing about the Gaza attack was "unprovoked"'

    From Zvi Ze'ev@21:1/5 to All on Mon Oct 16 00:29:18 2023
    XPost: uk.legal, soc.culture.jewish, alt.checkmate
    XPost: soc.culture.israel

    On Sun, 15 Oct 2023 19:01:17 -0400, Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid>
    wrote:

    Horrific. Unjustified. Morally wrong. But 'unprovoked'?

    After the Palestinian group Hamas launched the biggest attack on
    Israel in years--with many killed, hostages taken, and fighting
    raging--many US elected officials released statements Saturday
    condemning the "unprovoked" attacks.

    But many others took to Twitter Saturday to ask incredulously how
    Israel’s continued brutal occupation of the Palestinian people cannot
    be considered a provocation.

    75 years of ethnic cleansing
    15 years of blockade
    Confiscation of Palestinian lands
    Pogroms on Palestinian towns
    Desecration of Palestinian sacred sites
    Daily raids into Palestinian homes
    Constant humiliation of a entire people
    Nothing about today is "unprovoked."

    Writer Caitlin Johnstone tweeted: "It's clear now that whenever the
    western political/media class starts bleating the word "unprovoked" in >unison, you know with absolute certainty that whatever they're talking
    about was massively provoked."

    https://www.commondreams.org/news/horrific-unjustified-morally-wrong-but-unprovoked

    Yup.

    Indeed.

    Absolutely.

    Right on, all counts.

    Certainly.

    Is there, any doubt?

    Beyond, debate.

    It's so, obvious.

    Like, totally.

    It sure, was.

    Of, course.

    Clearly.

    Unequivocally.

    Random, one-word drivel.

    Me, too.

    No doubt, about it.

    You got, THAT right!

    --

    The Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus admits he got
    no life AT ALL outside stalking on THE Usenet!
    "Frankly, if he were gone, I wouldn't know what to do here."
    Message-ID: <FCOQt.107901$hp7.96925@fx13.fr7>

    The Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus, defending his fellow
    Grik sodomite the Grikboxer® and under the delusion that he's
    been able to grow a pair: "You'd have to get past me first,"
    Message-ID: <LOOQt.337647$Qr2.32934@fx08.fr7>

    Yet more proof that the Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus
    thinks he got a pair: "Just to let you know: ANYONE who "befriends"
    the subnormal swine will have to deal with me! Get ready, bitch!"
    Message-ID: <FHg6t.166438$Nl5.48106@newsfe07.iad>

    The Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus STILL seems to think
    he got a pair: "Which will NEVER happen! You'd have to get past
    me first, poor psycho! LOL"
    Message-ID: <MCSIu.1$c56.0@fx32.fr7>

    The Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus having still MORE delusions
    about growing a pair: "If ANYONE dared to grab me by the neck
    like that he'd get my fist in his face."
    Message-ID: <qeilfu$iog$1@gioia.aioe.org>

    In spite of all the evidence, the Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus
    STILL has delusions about growing a pair!
    "What kind of other-worldly pussies (men?) are you all? If someone
    would dare to grab me by the back of my neck like that and push me
    around, my instinctive, AUTOMATIC reaction would be to knock him in
    the face! NOBODY is allowed to do that to ANYONE!"
    Message-ID: <qfnPE.73303$YG3.18805@usenetxs.com>

    Best of all! From the Foreskin Peeler's doctoral dissertation in divinity, 'University' of Salonica (1992): "The jew g-d is your g-d's dad."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)