• Re: Despite lack of evidence, allegations of Hamas mass rape are fuelin

    From Spamming/forging jew paedophile BAR@21:1/5 to Ed P on Sun Dec 10 22:17:32 2023
    XPost: uk.legal, soc.culture.jewish, alt.revisionism
    XPost: alt.home.repair, soc.culture.israel

    On Sun, 10 Dec 2023 16:56:33 -0500, Ed P <esp@snet.xxx> wrote:

    On 12/10/2023 3:04 PM, Loose Cannon wrote:
    On Sun, 10 Dec 2023 10:41:28 -0800, Michael Ejercito
    <MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

    NefeshBarYochai wrote:
    After a lull, Israel’s allegations of sexual violence committed by
    Hamas have returned to international headlines with a vengeance. As
    the UN faces heightened pressure to condemn Hamas’s alleged sexual
    violence, the sudden onslaught of media and international attention
    nearly two months after October 7 begs the question, why now?

    Indeed, narratives of sexual violence have not only resurged, but they >>>> have done so with vim. Lurid stories of gang rape, mutilation, and
    even necrophilia, have been disseminated by the media. This has
    occurred despite there being no substantive developments in evidence
    of sexual assaults from the Israeli occupation forces. Israel has
    repeatedly failed to provide forensic evidence, concrete photographic
    evidence, or victim testimonies to news organizations beyond
    inferences made by Israel’s forensic teams. Indeed, the Times of
    Israel alleges that the IOF will never provide forensic evidence
    because “physical evidence of sexual assault was not collected from
    corpses by Israel’s overtaxed morgue facilities,” and it is now,
    reportedly, too late to collect conclusive evidence.

    Presently, Israel’s case consists of one eyewitness testimony shown
    privately to journalists by the Israeli police, witness testimonies of >>>> “body collectors,” forensic teams, and army staff, photographs taken
    at sites that suggest women may have been sexually assaulted, and
    witness testimonies of Hamas fighters acquired from Shin Bet, whose
    use of torture is notorious. Testimonies of victims will not be
    shared; the police have not interviewed any surviving victims, and
    according to May Golan, Israel’s Women’s Empowerment Minister, the
    very few victims who survived are receiving psychiatric treatment and
    are therefore, conveniently, unable to talk.

    It’s a far cry from the persistent efforts of the Palestinians, forced >>>> to film their murdered relatives, their burnt and mutilated children,
    and their friends and families in their most vulnerable moments of
    grief, all in a desperate attempt to show the world what is being
    inflicted upon them. Perhaps that is what privilege looks like, where
    the dignity of Israeli victims is preserved, and the dignity of
    Palestinian victims must be discarded in a desperate voyeuristic
    attempt to publicize their suffering, starkly aware that the survival
    of the Palestinian people depends on this.

    Israel’s secrecy remains deafening; the IOF exclusively screened a
    47-minute compilation of “raw footage” to invited journalists, as
    opposed to sharing the footage with news agencies to report on and
    verify independently (Al Jazeera journalists, notably, were not
    invited to attend). Amongst those invited, journalist Owen Jones saw
    no “conclusive evidence” for torture, sexual violence, rape, or
    beheadings. Furthermore, despite calling on the UN to condemn Hamas’s
    acts of sexual violence, Israel refuses to cooperate with a UN
    commission of inquiry into sexual violence committed by Hamas on the
    ludicrous basis that the UN has “an anti-Israel bias.”

    Nevertheless, despite deficient evidence, Israel has renewed its
    allegations of acts of sexual violence committed by Hamas, only with a >>>> new spin; they were now part of a systematic, concerted tactic of mass >>>> rape, as alleged by Dr. Elkayam-Levy, head of “The Civil Commission on >>>> October 7th Crimes by Hamas against Women and Children,” and a law
    professor with a troubled history of human rights abuses and close
    ties to the “National Security Council.” This narrative has been
    parroted by the U.S. State Department, whose spokesperson, Matt
    Miller, goes on to allege that “one of the reasons [Hamas] don’t want
    to turn women over that they’ve been holding hostage, and the reason
    this pause fell apart, is they don’t want those women to be able to
    talk about what happened to them during their time in custody.”

    Conversely, in the absence of concrete evidence of sexual assaults,
    what can we know about how Hamas treats women? Arguably, the hostages
    provide us the clearest evidence of Hamas’s comportment towards women, >>>> as we have direct footage of their release. The Israeli government
    has, rather absurdly, alleged that the hostages were tranquilized upon >>>> their release, in an effort to explain their friendly goodbyes to
    members of Hamas, which included handshakes, jokes, and smiles. The
    majority of the hostages have not yet been publicly interviewed,
    except Mia Leimberg, who emerged from captivity with her dog, Bella.
    Hostages’ experiences vary; while Daniel Aloni’s viral letter thanked
    Hamas for their treatment of her and her daughter, allegedly, at a
    meeting between Israeli war cabinet members and released hostages, an
    unnamed hostage recounted incidents of groping. However, the evidence
    to which we have direct access, which includes footage of the hostages >>>> being released and TikTok videos posted by the released hostages,
    shows the hostages to be smiling and in reasonable condition.

    The latest propaganda effort signifies a desperation in the Israeli
    propaganda machine. Activists and journalists have rightly pointed out >>>> how the Israeli government has weaponized sexual assault allegations,
    deriving from ulterior motives rather than a place of genuine concern
    for women and children given Israel’s own horrific track record on
    rape and sexual abuse, and furthermore, its active censorship of human >>>> rights groups investigating sexual assault abuses of Palestinian
    children, which Josh Paul, former director at the U.S Department of
    State, admitted to CNN.

    The U.S. State Department’s toothless allegation that the ceasefire
    ended because of Hamas’s barbaric desires towards women lacks
    credibility. However, the manufacture and escalation of a
    sensationalist media storm around October 7 allowed the Israeli
    government to reassert its hegemony over narratives surrounding events >>>> on that day. The wild descriptions of Hamas’s assaults re-center
    Hamas, thereby detracting from emerging investigations by news
    organizations that complicate the Israeli government’s account of a
    ruthless Hamas-led attack and probe the IOF’s complicity in
    slaughtering Israeli civilians, suggesting the IOF’s indiscriminate
    assault upon Hamas may have also caused the death of Israeli citizens. >>>>
    In addition, emphasizing the brutality and inhumanity of Hamas’s
    attacks on October 7 increasingly serves to legitimize Israeli
    revenge. Israel’s assault lacks any semblance of proportionality, as
    the death toll exceeds 16,000, and widespread graphic videos document, >>>> extensively and in detail, the annihilation of Palestinians, including >>>> the incineration of infants and toddlers. Exaggerating the inhumanity
    of the Hamas attacks suggests there is an equivalency of the Israeli
    response; though not in scale, it purports to suggest Israel’s assault >>>> is equal in nature and brutality, and therefore, revenge upon a
    population of 2.2 million people is logical.

    But it extends further than that. The reliance on lazy Orientalist
    caricatures of Arab men as savage sexual predators is both cunning and >>>> destructive. The implication that brutality and sexual depravity are
    intrinsic characteristics of Arab men and Arab people suggests that
    Palestinians are, inherently and irredeemably, an evil race, and their >>>> total annihilation, therefore, is justifiable. Manufacturing consent
    for a genocide works only when the genocide of a people is not
    regarded as a loss, and the eradication of their culture, their
    history, and their humanity is an act that renders the world a better
    place. The stigmatization and dehumanization of indigenous men and men >>>> of color is not new. It is an agenda that is all too familiar, and we
    must resist it.

    https://mondoweiss.net/2023/12/despite-lack-of-evidence-allegations-of-hamas-mass-rape-are-fueling-israeli-genocide-in-gaza/


    "From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free"

    You just wish you could have been a part of it.

    What you do unto the least of the Judenfraulein,

    All of the judensau are the least. One is no different than the other.

    you do unto St.Mary, Mother of Christ!


    Michael

    When was Mary made a saint?


    https://tinyurl.com/bddn3sst
    Here is the real reason why Mary is a Saint.

    Mary has been the first and faithful disciple of her son as his mother, >educator, follower to the foot of the cross, and steward of his legacy
    and mission among the first Christians. Mary's cooperation for the sake
    of the world at the side of her son continues even now and until the end
    of times

    The Virgin Mary, as she is known in Christianity, was a Palestinian
    woman. As for sainthood, she was never officially canonised.
    Canonisation requires at least one verified miracle.


    --

    The Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus admits he got
    no life AT ALL outside stalking on THE Usenet!
    "Frankly, if he were gone, I wouldn't know what to do here."
    Message-ID: <FCOQt.107901$hp7.96925@fx13.fr7>

    The Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus, defending his fellow
    Grik sodomite the Grikboxer® and under the delusion that he's
    been able to grow a pair: "You'd have to get past me first,"
    Message-ID: <LOOQt.337647$Qr2.32934@fx08.fr7>

    Yet more proof that the Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus
    thinks he got a pair: "Just to let you know: ANYONE who "befriends"
    the subnormal swine will have to deal with me! Get ready, bitch!"
    Message-ID: <FHg6t.166438$Nl5.48106@newsfe07.iad>

    The Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus STILL seems to think
    he got a pair: "Which will NEVER happen! You'd have to get past
    me first, poor psycho! LOL"
    Message-ID: <MCSIu.1$c56.0@fx32.fr7>

    The Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus having still MORE delusions
    about growing a pair: "If ANYONE dared to grab me by the neck
    like that he'd get my fist in his face."
    Message-ID: <qeilfu$iog$1@gioia.aioe.org>

    And AGAIN: "YOU sick pedo swine and ridiculous overt sexual cripple certainly won't EVER
    get past any of us! This is a PROMISE, our pedophilic punching bag! LOL: Message-ID: <178eb1f58212ab1a$16$2903823$49d319de@news.newsdemon.com>

    In spite of all the evidence, the Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus
    STILL has delusions about growing a pair!
    "What kind of other-worldly pussies (men?) are you all? If someone
    would dare to grab me by the back of my neck like that and push me
    around, my instinctive, AUTOMATIC reaction would be to knock him in
    the face! NOBODY is allowed to do that to ANYONE!"
    Message-ID: <qfnPE.73303$YG3.18805@usenetxs.com>

    Best of all! From the Foreskin Peeler's doctoral dissertation in divinity, 'University' of Salonica (1992): "The jew g-d is your g-d's dad."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Michael Ejercito@21:1/5 to All on Sun Dec 10 17:06:40 2023
    XPost: uk.legal, soc.culture.jewish, alt.revisionism
    XPost: alt.home.repair, soc.culture.israel

    Spamming/forging jew paedophile BARRY 'jewface' ZACHARY SHEIN wrote:
    On Sun, 10 Dec 2023 16:56:33 -0500, Ed P <esp@snet.xxx> wrote:

    On 12/10/2023 3:04 PM, Loose Cannon wrote:
    On Sun, 10 Dec 2023 10:41:28 -0800, Michael Ejercito
    <MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

    You just wish you could have been a part of it.

    What you do unto the least of the Judenfraulein,

    All of the judensau are the least. One is no different than the other.

    you do unto St.Mary, Mother of Christ!


    Michael

    When was Mary made a saint?


    https://tinyurl.com/bddn3sst
    Here is the real reason why Mary is a Saint.

    Mary has been the first and faithful disciple of her son as his mother,
    educator, follower to the foot of the cross, and steward of his legacy
    and mission among the first Christians. Mary's cooperation for the sake
    of the world at the side of her son continues even now and until the end
    of times

    The Virgin Mary, as she is known in Christianity, was a Palestinian
    woman. As for sainthood, she was never officially canonised.
    Canonisation requires at least one verified miracle.


    Giving birth to Christ, the Only Begotten Son of HaShem, was the
    miracle!


    Michael

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)