XPost: alt.history.ancient-egypt, soc.culture.egypt, alt.culture.egyptian XPost: alt.egyptians.copts

— ARE THE VEGAN #419 - PROTESTS AN ASYMMETRICAL GLOBALIST MOVEMENT PROPAGANDISED BY INTEGRAL WORLD WHICH IS INTENTIONED ON DESTABILISING
SOVEREIGN NATIONS?

(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 14 April, 2019

The following statement made within an interview of Frank Visser by a
vegan neo-Nazi David Long is entirely false as an act of public
deception due to the circumstance that an Intellectual Categorical
Imperative (ie. 4 quadrants) within an eight tier transformational
process of #312 - CONTRADICTION (ie. How else might it differentiate
reality) is reliant upon a #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL so as to then
maintain its acceptable #81 - ORDER OF THINGS and therefore is
implicitly antagonistic towards the SOVEREIGN JUXTAPOSITION PRINCIPLE as
the sapient dignity of the person.

<https://youtu.be/T4WonbHX2aU>

WHAT DO YOU SAY TO PEOPLE WHO SAY INTEGRAL WORLD IS NOT THE #311 - HOME
OF GOOD CRITICISM?

I think that's a very easy dismissal itself. If this forum has been
alive for twenty years, and has been for a long time the only online
forum to seriously discuss these ideas, what you can expect is a great
variety of quality of submissions to that forum, but for sure there have
been some valid ideas that have been expressed. Even a whole book, by
Jeff Meyerhoff, has been published on that website and I hope my
contributions also count as valid criticism, so I really don't know what
to say about these kinds of responses. Because you can use that argument
until the *COW* {ie.

8 APRIL 2018

AS DATE OF VEGAN PROTESTERS UNAPOLOGETIC FOR MELBOURNE'S PEAK-HOUR
CHAOS, ABATTOIR BLOCKADES

<https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/vegan-protesters-unapologetic-for-melbourne-s-peak-hour-chaos-abattoir-blockades-20190408-p51by5.html>

H1241@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 8 (#14); Ego: 2 (#8),
   @3: Sup: 10 (#24); Ego: 2 (#10),
   @4: Sup: 29 (#53); Ego: 19 (#29),
   @5: Sup: 67 (#120); Ego: 38 (#67),
   @6: Sup: 36 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 50 (#117),
   @7: Sup: 42 (#198); Ego: 6 (#123),
   Male: #198; Feme: #123
} // #36

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #302 % #41 = #15 - Mastering Guiding Discourse, Revealers of
Virtue; I-Ching: H61 - Inner Trust, Inner Truth, Center Returning;
Tetra: 1 - Centre;

THOTH MEASURE: #15 - Oh Lord of Righteousness, who makest thine
appearance in the place of Righteousness; I am not a land-grabber.

    #VIRTUE: With Reach (no. #15), daily increasing its kind.
    #TOOLS: With Diminishment (no. #55), daily depleting its type.
    #POSITION: With Resistance (no. #22), intolerance, but
    #TIME: With Unity (no. #54), magnanimity.
    #CANON: #146

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_146@{
   @1: Sup: 15 (#15); Ego: 15 (#15),
   @2: Sup: 70 (#85); Ego: 55 (#70),
   @3: Sup: 11 (#96); Ego: 22 (#92),
   @4: Sup: 65 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 54 (#146 -
I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
   Male: #161; Feme: #146
} // #14

#302 as [#2, #100, #200] / #366 as [#6, #2, #2, #100, #200, #50, #6] =
bâqâr (H1241): {UMBRA: #0 as #302 % #41 = #15} 1) cattle, herd, oxen,
ox; 1a) cattle (generic pl. but sing. in form - coll); 1b) herd
(particular one); 1c) head of cattle (individually);

} come #311 - *HOME*, and you are really neck-deep into your ideology,
but you really need to engage your criticism to avoid that #302 -
*DANGER*." [<http://www.integralworld.net/long2.html>]

That any dialogue which doesn’t deploy their semantics of opportunity is
then subject to scorn, censorship and isolationism and by such actions
does not convey any intellectual integrity and fails to foster honest
enquiry.

Nous: #12
Time: 01:15 hrs
Date: 2019.4.8
Torah: [#70, #30, #40]@{
@1: Sup: 70 (#70); Ego: 70 (#70),
@2: Sup: 19 (#89); Ego: 30 (#100),
@3: Sup: 59 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}); Ego: 40 (#140 -
I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER {%16}),
Male: #148; Feme: #140
} // #140

Dao: Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining from Desire
Tetra: #25 - Contention
I-Ching: H6 - Contention, Conflict, Arguing, Lawsuit

Latin: Altissimus {Hidden God; cf: high; deep/profound; shrill; lofty,
noble; deep rooted; far-fetched; grown great (Vulgate [Psalms 45:7])}
Alt: Amamyah {Join with God} {

1. HELPS AGAINST SPIRITUAL TORMENT & REVEALS TRAITORS
2. SEA VOYAGES
3. OF DISCOVERIES
4. Senacher , Sennacherib {bramble; thistle}
}

Solar Eclipse: 27 February 1998 (AEST)
Solar Eclipse: 8 April 2005 (AEST)

Kenan {Fixed, (nestlings; figuratively a chamber or dwelling:-nest,
room), buyer; owner}

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#427 / #366} / HETEROS {#455 / #380} / TORAH {#461
/ #383}

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:4,row:1,col:6,nous:12&lexicon:H1241>

.jackNote@zen: 4, row: 1, col: 6, nous: 12 [Date: 2019.4.8, Time: 01:15
hrs, Super: #427 / #81 - Propounding the Essential; I-Ching: H11 -
Peace, Pervading, Greatness; Tetra: 15 - Reach, Ego: #366 / #12 -
Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining from Desire; I-Ching: H6
- Contention, Conflict, Arguing, Lawsuit; Tetra: 25 - Contention]

*THAT* *THE* *POSTER* {:-]))) <wudao@wuji.net> IS ENGAGING IN SUBTERFUGE
AND OUGHT TO BE PLACED ON A TERRORIST WATCH LIST...

BUDGIE TALK: "How have u been?"

MOI: "I have a headache at present...

But otherwise very happy with the world since I sunk an attempt by others:

#273 - REASON (FORMULA FOR PRESERVATION OF EUROPEAN AUTONOMY)
#302 - TRAP / JUXTAPOSITION
#362 - MOUSE

(An unusual triangulation of three numbers given by my intellectual
property as actions others were publicly engaged)

To override our nation’s sovereignty which was associated with the
toilet defamation on 28 October 2017 when I gave a carpe diem against
the local RSL / Catholic / Knights Templars International whom were up
to no good...

A year later I had an improper attempted delivery of toilet blocks to my
home address ...

YOUTUBE: "Flushed Away (Trailer)"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VhpmWK1nVck>"

I will win my court case

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#362 / #302} / HETEROS {#331 / #327} / TORAH {#406
/ #324}

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/grumble.html?zen:1,row:6,col:1,nous:60&lexicon:G3850>

.jackNote@zen: 1, row: 6, col: 1, nous: 60 [Date: (none), Time: (none),
Super: #362 / #60 - Skill Rulership, Maintain One's Place; I-Ching: H15
- Modesty, Humbling; Tetra: 5 - Keeping Small, Ego: #302 / #60 - Skill Rulership, Maintain One's Place; I-Ching: H15 - Modesty, Humbling;
Tetra: 5 - Keeping Small]

G3850@{
   @1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
   @2: Sup: 81 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 1 (#81),
   @3: Sup: 19 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE
{%19}); Ego: 19 (#100),
   @4: Sup: 20 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8}); Ego:
1 (#101),
   @5: Sup: 22 (#222); Ego: 2 (#103),
   @6: Sup: 11 (#233); Ego: 70 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST {%27}),
   @7: Sup: 41 (#274); Ego: 30 (#203),
   @8: Sup: 49 (#323); Ego: 8 (#211),
   @9: Sup: 59 (#382); Ego: 10 (#221),
   Male: #382; Feme: #221
} // #302

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #292 % #41 = #5 - Natural Guidance, Function of Emptiness;
I-Ching: H63 - Ferrying Complete, Completion & After, Already Fording;
Tetra: 73 - Already Fording, Completion;

THOTH MEASURE: #5 - Oh thou of Serpent face, who makest thine appearance
at Re-Stau; I am not a slayer of men.

    #VIRTUE: Keeping Small (no. #5) means the minute first signs.
    #TOOLS: Greatness (no. #45) means battening.
    #POSITION: As to Accumulation (no. #60), it is the many, but
    #TIME: As to Keeping Small (no. #5), it is the few.
    #CANON: #115

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_115@{
   @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
   @2: Sup: 50 (#55); Ego: 45 (#50),
   @3: Sup: 29 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 60 (#110),
   @4: Sup: 34 (#118); Ego: 5 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
   Male: #118; Feme: #115
} // #115 <--- *DIGNITY * ROYAL*

#302 as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #2, #70, #30, #8, #10] = parabolḗ (G3850): {UMBRA: #79 as #292 % #41 = #5} 1) *A* *PLACING* *OF* *ONE* *THING* *BY*
*THE* *SIDE* *OF* *ANOTHER*, *JUXTAPOSITION*, as of ships in battle; 2) metaph.; 2a) a comparing, comparison of one thing with another,
likeness, similitude; 2b) an example by which a doctrine or precept is illustrated; 2c) *A* *NARRATIVE*, *FICTITIOUS* *BUT* *AGREEABLE* *TO*
*THE* *LAWS* *AND* *USAGES* *OF* *HUMAN* *LIFE*, by which either the
duties of men or the things of God, particularly the nature and history
of God's kingdom are figuratively portrayed; 2d) *A* *PARABLE*: *AN*
*EARTHLY* *STORY* *WITH* *A* *HEAVENLY* *MEANING*; 3) a pithy and
instructive saying, involving some likeness or comparison and having
preceptive or admonitory force; 3a) an aphorism, a maxim; 4) a proverb;
5) *AN* *ACT* *BY* *WHICH* *ONE* *EXPOSES* *HIMSELF* *OR* *HIS*
*POSSESSIONS* *TO* *DANGER*, *A* *VENTURE*, *A* *RISK*;

"Therefore- speak I to them in parables-G3850: because they seeing see
not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand." [Matthew 13:13]

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Potty%20Mouth.pdf>

EGGIE (REGGIEK@KROTEKO.COM) @ 0201 HOURS ON 10 DECEMBER 2018: "WHY
BELIEVE SCIENCE WHEN YOU CAN BELIEVE TRUMP?

I believe everything Trump says. I don't believe anything scientists say.

Trump will make me grate.

No education is required to believe Trump. Everything he says is simple."

DOLF @ 0519 HOURS ON 10 DECEMBER 2018: "

— GNOSIS OSMOSIS —

“REGGIE THE VEGGIE
TRIES TO BE RECUSED.
OF A NAZI IDENTITY.
BUT AS MEATHEAD.

A PARADING VEGAN. {@334 - PROLEGOMENA SECTION #46 - PSYCHOLOGICAL IDEAS (Critique, pp. 341 ff.)}
BY A FLAP IS FIXATED.
HE’S A CHEESY BOGAN.
THAT’S EMANCIPATED.”

<https://www.facebook.com/125982670754724/posts/2268673266485643/>



<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Reggie.jpeg>

[SBS NEWS @ 1500 HOURS ON 7 DECEMBER 2018: Veganism is growing in
popularity – will it eventually become the norm?]

KANT'S PROLEGOMENA SECTION #46 - PSYCHOLOGICAL IDEAS: @334: It has long
been observed that in all substances the true subject – namely that
which remains after all accidents (as predicates) have been removed –
and hence the substantial itself, is unknown to us; and various
complaints have been made about these limits to our insight. But it
needs to be said that human understanding is not to be blamed because it
does not know the substantial in things, i.e., cannot determine it by
itself, but rather because it wants to cognize determinately, like an
object that is given, what is only an idea. Pure reason demands that for
each predicate of a thing we should seek its appropriate subject, but
that for this subject, which is in turn necessarily only a predicate, we
should seek its subject again, and so forth to infinity (or as far as we
get). But from this it follows that we should take nothing that we can
attain for a final subject, and that the substantial itself could never
be thought by our ever-so-deeply penetrating understanding, even if
*THE* *WHOLE* *OF* *NATURE* *WERE* *LAID* *BARE* *BEFORE* *IT*; for the specific nature of our understanding consists in thinking everything discursively, i.e., through concepts, hence through mere predicates,
among which the absolute subject must therefore always be absent.
Consequently, *ALL* *REAL* *PROPERTIES* *BY* *WHICH* *WE* *COGNIZE*
*BODIES* *ARE* *MERE* *ACCIDENTS* *FOR* *WHICH* *WE* *LACK* *A*
*SUBJECT* – *EVEN* *IMPENETRABILITY*, *WHICH* *MUST* *ALWAYS* *BE* *CONCEIVED* *ONLY* *AS* *THE* *EFFECT* *OF* *A* *FORCE*." [Page 85, 86]

Can you #331 - NOT also see the dichotomy by a buffoonery notion of this
PARIS RIOTS picture (shown above) as presumably an Islamic binomial
mindset of an unreasoned methodology yet presumptuously claiming to
dictate peace as conveying circularity of #492 - AUTONOMOUS VOLUNTARY
FREEWILL (ie. either Liberty / Egalitarian depending upon the nuance) in
being paradoxically entirely of a trinomial providence:

MADNESS AND DARKNESS IS UPON THE PEOPLE AS DERANGED HYSTERIA.

#902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 as *ONTIC*
necessity comprising a subset of 21 consonants with #VOWELS of Semitic origins),

#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X #41), and

#391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900}) OF CIVIL
SOCIETY

DOLF @ 1528 HOURS ON 9 DECEMBER 2018: "We see from another poster's
unreasoned and pejorative response just how true and self satisfying a
contempt by ignorance as #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL can really be and especially so within a herd mentality where a foolsome dignity is
bestowed by a common consensus but doesn't have sufficient sensibility excepting its own self-entitlement by which it engorges itself within a hedonistic lustful *FRAUDULENT* indecency that it's opine is worth
something more than a *RAZOO* ...

[F, {@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6)}
i, {@2: Sup: 15 (#21); Ego: 9 (#15)}
x, {@3: Sup: 48 (#69); Ego: 33 (#48)}
e, {@4: Sup: 53 (#122); Ego: 5 (#53)}
d, {@5: Sup: 57 (#179); Ego: 4 (#57)}
i, {@6: Sup: 66 (#245); Ego: 9 (#66)}
t, {@7: Sup: 23 (#268); Ego: 38 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7})}
f, {@8: Sup: 29 (#297); Ego: 6 (#110)}
o, {@9: Sup: 8 (#305); Ego: 60 (#170)}
r, {@10: Sup: 17 (#322); Ego: 9 (#179)}
y, {@11: Sup: 69 (#391 ***); Ego: 52 (#231 ***)}
o, {@12: Sup: 48 (#439); Ego: 60 (#291)}
u] {@13: Sup: 24 (#463); Ego: 57 (#348)}

IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783 as *BEFORE* *THE* *FRENCH*
*REVOLUTION*) SECTION #54 AS IDEA: @348: "This then is the statement and solution of the whole antinomy in which reason finds itself entangled in
the application of its principles to the sensible world, and of which
the former (the mere statement) even by itself would already be of
considerable benefit toward a knowledge of human reason, even if the
solution of this conflict should not yet fully satisfy the reader, who
has here to combat a natural illusion that has only recently been
presented to him as such, after he had *HITHERTO* *ALWAYS* *TAKEN*
*THAT* *ILLUSION* *FOR* *THE* *TRUTH*.

GOVERNMENT SHILL #2 (GOV.SHILL@GMAIL.COM) @ 1347 HOURS ON 9 DECEMBER
2018: "MADNESS AND DARKNESS IS UPON [*DOLF*] AS DERANGED HYSTERIA.

Fixed it for you."

— POUTING SNOUT —

“THAT’LL DO PIG...
HAVE SOME SWILL.
GIVE IT A WHIRL.
WITH YOUR FORK.
GRUE[L]SOME JIG.
FOR SUCH A DILL.
WORTHLESS PEARL.
AND ENDLESS PORK.”

YOUTUBE: “That'll do pig, that'll do (Babe)”

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjQtzV9IZ0Q>

One consequence of all this is, indeed, inevitable; namely, that since
*IT* *IS* *COMPLETELY* *IMPOSSIBLE* *TO* *ESCAPE* *FROM* *THIS*
*CONFLICT* *OF* *REASON* *WITH* *ITSELF* *AS* *LONG* *AS* *THE*
*OBJECTS* *OF* *THE* *SENSIBLE* *WORLD* *ARE* *TAKEN* *FOR* *THINGS*
*IN* *THEMSELVES* – and not for what they in fact are, that is, for mere appearances – the reader is obliged, for that reason, to take up once
more the deduction of all our cognition a priori (and the examination of
that deduction which I have provided), in order to come to a decision
about it. For the present I do not require more; for if, through this
pursuit, he has first thought himself deeply enough into the nature of
pure reason, then the concepts by means of which alone the solution to
this conflict of reason is possible will already be familiar to him, a circumstance without which I cannot expect full approbation from even
the most attentive reader. [IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA. p 144]

RAZOO: used to denote an imaginary coin of little value or a very small
sum of money.

[R, {@1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9)}
A, {@2: Sup: 10 (#19); Ego: 1 (#10)}
Z, {@3: Sup: 81 (#100); Ego: 71 (#81)}
O, {@4: Sup: 60 (#160); Ego: 60 (#141)}
O] {@5: Sup: 39 (#199); Ego: 60 (#201)}

H6996@{
   @1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
   @2: Sup: 59 (#99); Ego: 19 (#59),
   @3: Sup: 68 (#167); Ego: 9 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE
GOD OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
   @4: Sup: 39 (#206); Ego: 52 (#120),
   Male: #206; Feme: #120
} // #199

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #199 % #41 = #35 - Great Guiding Signs?, Virtue of Benevolence;
I-Ching: H17 - Following, Allegiance; Tetra: 19 - Following;

THOTH MEASURE: #35 - Oh Tem-sepu, who makest thine appearance in Tattu;
*I* *AM* *NOT* *ONE* *WHO* *CURSETH* *THE* *KING*.

    #VIRTUE: As to Gathering (no. #35), it is success.
    #TOOLS: With Failure (no. #75), loss of fortune.
    #POSITION: With Ascent (no. #7), high ambitions.
    #TIME: With Sinking (no. #64), low ambitions.
    #CANON: #181

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
   @1: Sup: 35 (#35); Ego: 35 (#35),
   @2: Sup: 29 (#64); Ego: 75 (#110),
   @3: Sup: 36 (#100); Ego: 7 (#117),
   @4: Sup: 19 (#119); Ego: 64 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE
WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
   Male: #119; Feme: #181
} // #181

#199 as [#40, #100, #9, #700] = qatan (H6996): {UMBRA: #1 as #199 % #41
= #35} 1) young, small, insignificant, unimportant; 1a) *small*; 1b) insignificant; 1c) young; 1d) *unimportant*;

G3664@{
   @1: Sup: 70 (#70); Ego: 70 (#70),
   @2: Sup: 29 (#99); Ego: 40 (#110),
   @3: Sup: 18 (#117); Ego: 70 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH
ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19}),
   @4: Sup: 28 (#145); Ego: 10 (#190),
   @5: Sup: 29 (#174); Ego: 1 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS {%32}),
   @6: Sup: 39 (#213); Ego: 10 (#201),
   Male: #213; Feme: #201
} // #201

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #201 % #41 = #37 - Non-Deeming Action, Government Administration; I-Ching: H40 - Release, Deliverance, Taking-Apart, Untangled; Tetra: 21
- Release;

THOTH MEASURE: #37 - Oh Striker, who makest thine appearance in Heaven;
*I* *AM* *NOT* *ONE* *OF* *LOUD* *VOICE*.

    #VIRTUE: Purity (no. #37) means the Way of the ruler.
    #TOOLS: Compliance (no. #77) means the subject’s preservation.
    #POSITION: With Penetration (no. #14), a sharp advance.
    #TIME: With Dimming (no. #68), an impeded walk.
    #CANON: #196

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_196@{
   @1: Sup: 37 (#37); Ego: 37 (#37),
   @2: Sup: 33 (#70); Ego: 77 (#114),
   @3: Sup: 47 (#117); Ego: 14 (#128),
   @4: Sup: 34 (#151); Ego: 68 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}),
   Male: #151; Feme: #196
} // #196

#201 as [#70, #40, #70, #10, #1, #10] = homoios (G3664): {UMBRA: #41 as
#201 % #41 = #37} 1) like, similar, resembling; 1a) like: i.e.
resembling; 1b) like: i.e. *CORRESPONDING* *TO* *A* *THING*;

GOVERNMENT SHILL #2 (GOV.SHILL@GMAIL.COM) @ 1013 HOURS ON 8 DECEMBER
2018: "THERE IS NO TRUTH TO THE SOYLENT GREEN RUMOUR THAT IN ORDER TO
COMPLY WITH HALAL CERTIFICATION WASABI IS BEING MARKETED AS KHASHOGGI:

Who the hell are you replying to?

Please learn to Usenet."

DOLF @ 0408 HOURS ON 12 DECEMBER 2018: "YOU ARE NOT AN #343 -
*UBERMENSCH* ...

But understand this our FINAL SOLUTION that as a narcissistic imbecile
with an infatuation of self-bestowed dignity which is ignorance as #231
- JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL.

It is little wonder that the Dutch capitulated to the Nazi’s within 5
days but at least the French #22 - *RESISTANCE* will be sufficient to
withstand the hysteria of the SOYLENT GREEN ANARCHIST RIOTING.

We are here to render assistance but that you should to get use to the
idea your ego ought NOT to impose itself by any means whatsoever upon my SELF-IDENTITY AS FORMULA AS AUTONOMY.

— APPLE RELISH —

"GUILTY AS SIN,
NOT REALLY NICE.
OVERTAKE TIME.
TRUTH'S DEVICE.
HEAR IT RHYME
OUR NANO IS IN."

Otherwise I will give you a lesson which will leave you pickled and it
won't be relish.

Het lijkt erop dat u onderworpen bent aan een gemeenschappelijke stroom semantiek als het lexicon van opportunisme:

Verzet is zinloos - you will be assimilated!

YOUTUBE: "The Borg Assimilation"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkasJZZxRU0>

THE ÜBERMENSCH (GERMAN FOR "BEYOND-MAN", "SUPERMAN", "OVERMAN",
"SUPERHUMAN", "HYPERMAN", "HYPERHUMAN"); IS A CONCEPT IN THE PHILOSOPHY
OF FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE. IN HIS 1883 BOOK THUS SPOKE ZARATHUSTRA (GERMAN:
ALSO SPRACH ZARATHUSTRA), NIETZSCHE HAS HIS CHARACTER ZARATHUSTRA POSIT
THE ÜBERMENSCH AS A GOAL {

#343 - TELOS / *AUTONOMOUS* *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *COHESION*: @65 -
ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN RELATIONS: H54 - MARRYING MAIDEN: #3
+ #6 = #9 as SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE *AGAINST* *BOTH* *THE*
*PRINCIPLE* *OF* *JUXTAPOSITION*: @1 - SOVEREIGNTY: SECTION VIII TO
QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900: #27 + #54 = #81 AND
PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY @5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE: SECTION IX TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900: #9 + #18 = #27 IN REGARD TO
THE SUCCESSION OF SOVEREIGNTY

} FOR HUMANITY TO SET FOR ITSELF. IT IS A WORK OF PHILOSOPHICAL ALLEGORY {

#288 - META SCHEMA ACQUIESCENCE: @1 - @728 - PASSOVER, @5 - PENTECOST,
@65, #175 THEURGIC SYNCRETISM OF NEOPLATONISM COMMONLY USED BY
PYTHAGOREAN NUMBER DERIVED GOVERNANCE (ROMAN CATHOLICISM / ISLAM etc)
THAT IS UNLAWFULLY DEPLOYING MY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AS #391 -
HOMOGENEOUS PARADIGM BY #288 - UMBRA RAW MAPPING TO THEIR ANKH HETEROS /
TORAH PROTOTYPES

}, WITH A STRUCTURAL SIMILARITY TO THE GATHAS OF ZOROASTER/ZARATHUSTRA:

According to Kant, the starting point, a reflection on our moral
concepts {#41 x n}, leads immediately to the first intermediate thesis,
that (1) a moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC*] NECESSITY
WITH IT” (GMS, 389,13). If this necessity is very narrowly interpreted,
that is, in the sense of the previously worked out modal status {

@1 - Nature Contains Nature [#328 - TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE] {

HOMOIOS
HETEROS
KABBALAH
AS DEFINED

} ...

@5 - Act of Nature [#369 - REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITOR WITH #164 - CHRONOLOGICAL PLANE MAPPING] ...

#15 (@6 - Form of Nature: #260 - Transforming Nature [#41 - REMEMBER THE SABBATH]) ...

45: [1 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG]
68: [42 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN]

#34 (@7 - Engendering Nature: #175 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE [#82 -
HONOUR YOUR PARENTS]) ...

84: [2 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE]
86: [10 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD]
102: [4 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS]
104: [7 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD]
115: [5 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN]

#65 (@2 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE: #34 - Engendering Nature [#123
- DO NOT KILL]) ...

130: [3 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED]
139: [13 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS]
140: [14 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY, 16 - I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER]
146: [15 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER]
148: [12 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR]
150: [28 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER]
156: [21 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS]
157: [17 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE, 41 - I HAVE NO STRONG
DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY]
158: [23 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH]
161: [9 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES]

#111 (@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: #65 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE
[#164 - AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY]) ...

166: [11 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH]
168: [26 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY]
169: [18 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS]
171: [20 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE]
173: [27 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST]
175: [22 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR]
177: [29 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING]
180: [19 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE]
181: [24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS, 35
- I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING]
182: [6 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN]
184: [36 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS FLOW]
185: [25 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR]
186: [31 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND]
191: [32 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS]
192: [39 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE]
196: [37 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE]
197: [33 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH]
200: [8 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY]

#175 (@4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE: #369 - Autonomous Nature [#205
- DO NOT STEAL]) ...

210: [30 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND]
215: [34 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF MISCHIEF]
220: [38 - I CURSE NOT A GOD]
228: [40 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES]

#260 (@8 - Transforming Nature: #111 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#246 -
BEAR NO FALSE WITNESS]) ...

#369 (@9 - Autonomous Nature: #15 - Form of Nature [#287 - COVET NOT])

} of an ethical principle, then two peculiarities of the total
argumentation will become more understandable as prescriptive of its
trinomial basis to nomenclature.

Jean Piaget (9 August 1896 – 16 September 1980) as Swiss Philosopher
being the originator of a seminal Cognitive Development Theory And Epistemological View, wrote that within logic, juxtaposition {ie.

WE HOLD THE INFORMAL RESEARCH VIEW:

#41 - TO BE OR #81 - NOT TO BE THAT IS THE #364 - QUESTION AS #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL MADE OF IGNORANCE AND IT’S ENDLESS #312 -
CONTRADICTION AGAINST THE #123 - SENSIBILITY OF #273 - REASON ITSELF

AS THEN THE PROVISIONAL PROPOSITION WHICH WE HAVE MADE OF
SELF-JUSTIFICATION:

#277 - *RIGHT* *TO* *PLACE* *A* *TEST* / #123 - *JUDGEMENT*
*SENSIBILITY* AS IT'S CONVEYANCE BY THE #400 - *RATIONALITY* *OF*
*SPEECH* BEING IMPLICITLY COMPLIANT WITH A #205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *PERSISTENCE* *SUBSTANCE* EFFECTING MODERATION ENABLING THE TRAVERSAL OF
THE SELF-EGO WITHIN TEMPORAL CONTINUUM AND BY WHICH THE #164 - *REVERSE* *TRANSCRIPTASE* *INHIBITOR* *PROCESS* AS ITS ONTOLOGICAL DYNAMIC
*PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY* IS THEN KEPT WITHIN REASONABLE BOUNDS AS CIRCULARITY OF 22 ELEMENTS (RATIONAL PI) CONSTITUTED BY THE #41 - ONTIC PROPOSITION.

} is a logical fallacy on the part of the observer, where two items
placed next to each other imply a correlation, when none is actually claimed. He disagreed with the idea that intelligence was a fixed trait,
and regarded cognitive development as a process which occurs due to
biological maturation and interaction with the environment.

In the elaboration of the logical model of intellectual development,
Piaget argued that intelligence develops in a series of stages that are
related to age and are progressive because one stage must be
accomplished before the next can occur. For each stage of development
the child forms a view of reality for that age period. At the next
stage, the child must keep up with earlier level of mental abilities to reconstruct concepts. Piaget conceived intellectual development as an
upward expanding spiral in which children must constantly reconstruct
the ideas formed at earlier levels with new, higher order concepts
acquired at the next level.

GIVE ME A CHILD TILL HIS SEVENTH YEAR AND I WILL SHOW YOU THE MAN IS A
MAXIM OF THE CHURCH.

The action of *CASTRATO* which was practiced by ROMAN EMPEROR NERO {#666
as *PONTIFEX* *MAXIMUS*} (he replaced his wife with one) was only
outlawed within the 20th century and after the establishment of the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA by QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT dated 29
OCTOBER 1900 as conveying the FIRST PRINCIPLE @492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL
{@369 / @123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY (#3 x #3 - CENTRE INTERLOCK)} which
is in concordance with women's suffrage ...

...such MALAKOS against the SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE entitlement of
the person of another epitomises the depravity of the Roman Catholic
Church...

But wait a minute Pope Benedict XVI was in the #231 - Hitler youth {ie.
Adolf Hitler said in Table Talk Ideas @1 and @5 that fascism was a
return to the traditions of ancient Rome: @1 - RETAINED, @5 - CENTRE OF
VALUE {#111 / #666 - *SUNDAY* *SACREDNESS*}, #65 - soldier, #175 - marriage}

And why is he besides self justification otherwise so incapable of
answers as the breaching of our Constitutional entitlement by his
erroneous religious beliefs?

“YE WORSHIP YE KNOW NOT WHAT: WE KNOW WHAT WE WORSHIP: FOR SALVATION IS
OF THE JEWS.” [John 4:22 (KJV)]



<http://www.grapple369.com/images/HOSPITABLITY.PNG>

#71 #1 #11
#61 #81 #21
#51 #41 #31 = #369 as DISCRIMINATING NORM OF HUMAN NATURE / WAN WU AS ORGANISATION OF THINGS IN NATURE

#205 = PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE (YANG)
#164 = PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY (YIN)

#41 - EMANATION PRINCIPLE (REMEMBER THE SABBATH)
#82 - TERMS OF CONTINUITY (HONOUR PARENTS)
#123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY (DO NOT KILL)
#164 = PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY (YIN / TORAH: AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY)
#205 = PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE (YANG / YAHAD: DO NOT STEAL)
#246 - NORMA OBLIGANS (BEAR NO FALSE WITNESS)
#287 - MANIFESTING NORM (COVET NOT)

@492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL {@369 / @123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY (#3 x #3 -
CENTRE INTERLOCK)}

@205 / #873 - QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT <-- PRINCIPLES OF PROBITY
@82 / #491 - SECTION IX <— TERMS OF CONTINUITY
@164 / #3273 - SECTION VIII (?) <— COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS
@123 / #2188 - SECTION III (?) <— JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT

@41 / #113 - EMANATION FUNCTION <— ETHICAL ENGAGEMENT

I’M SURPRISED THAT THE FORMER POPE IS OF SUFFICIENTLY SOUND MIND TO
WRITE A COHERENT SENTENCE LET ALONE CONVEY ANY AFFECTIONS FOR TRUTH.

It was primarily the “Third Piaget” (the logical model of intellectual development) that was debated by *AMERICAN* *PSYCHOLOGISTS* when
Piaget’s ideas were “rediscovered” in the 1960s. In the 1950s, Clare Graves extended Piaget’s psychology through adulthood. Don Beck and Christopher Cowan developed Graves’s model further in Spiral Dynamics. Graves argued that humans evolve new psychological stages in response to changing life conditions. When a society contains a critical number of
people at a given stage, the society itself transforms, creating the
social conditions for yet another stage of psychological development. [<https://fee.org/articles/spiral-dynamics-an-overview/>]

Christopher Cowan is now deceased, however if I were to correspond with
him [which I did @ 1230 hours on 27 August, 2016 in memory of him and
his accomplishments], I would then convey the following: "I've done some considerable informal research in advancing the 4-Quadrant, 8-Tier
paradigm proposed by yourself and Don Beck within your book published in
1996 and titled, "Spiral Dynamics: Mastering Values, Leadership, and
Change". He had surmised of my own informal research efforts, "THOSE WHO
HAVE NOT RECENTLY VISITED DOLF BOEK'S WORK WILL FIND MUCH NEW AT HTTP://.../TELOS. GIVEN THE SITUATION IN ISRAEL/PALESTINE AND ALL OF THE RELIGIOUS UNDERCURRENTS IN TODAY'S WORLD, DOLF'S PERSPECTIVE OFFERS YET
ANOTHER WAY TO VIEW THE FORCES INFLUENCING HUMAN NATURE."

I was once asked by him, what I considered of Pythagoras's use of #36
and it has taken me many years of careful consideration and I feel that
I have now got an acceptable explanation: "In the process of
invalidating the original Letters Patent to the Australian Constitution
of 1901 and conveying it's dependency (ie. arch kai telos oida {1 + 2 +
3 + 4 = 10}) upon the Pythagorean Tetrad/Decad/Tetractys as the fount of
SOULS which is purveyed by the binary HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER, which I
have shown it to be a CANON OF TRANSPOSITION that is intellectually
dependent upon a superior conception of a ternary HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER."

In my view, it is concerned with the essential encapsulating knowledge
as the driver conveyed within the Pythagorean marriage (ie. being
expressed as the Harmony because it hath the power to in-generate a
vital habit as hymenealism) metathesis which has bought about it's
deployment as TETRAD OF MAGIC SQUARES {#15 ... #34 ... #65 ... #111} and
that which formed the foundational basis of Roman Imperial Governance
made in association with the adoption of the Julian Calendar and which

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)