XPost: alt.history.ancient-egypt, soc.culture.egypt, alt.culture.egyptian XPost: alt.egyptians.copts

Nous: #36
Time: 01:40 hrs
Date: 2019.4.15 <— NOTRE DAME FIRE 🔥
Torah:

Dao: Natural Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation
Tetra: #12 - Youthfulness
I-Ching: H4 - Juvenile Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The
young shoot, Discovering

#260 CE

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#325 / #367} / HETEROS {#330 / #329} / TORAH {#324
/ #326}

We have at 1952 HOURS ON 19 APRIL 2019 COMMUNICATED WITH THE AMERICAN
CONSULATE (SYDNEY) AND FACEBOOK (PRESS, SUBPOENA, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY)
AND RAISED THE OBJECTION ABOUT MY RESPONSE TO PARLIAMENTARIAN TIM
WILSON’s SUPPORT OF ISRAEL FOLAU’s HOMOPHOBIC #444 - SLANDER (#444 -
COMBAT OF SPORTS / PRO DOMO and #341 are attributed to 31 December)
BEING CONSEQUENCE BY A GOOD FRIDAY ACCOUNT SUSPENSION BY FACEBOOK OVER
NON EXISTENT HATE SPEECH AND THAT INCLUDED THE NOTRE DAME INTERVENTION
BY US PRIOR TO SUCH EVENT AND A POEM WRITTEN TO PRESIDENT EMMANUEL
MACRON WITHIN ONE HOUR OF HIS PUBLIC STATEMENT TO CONCLUDE:

— HELL’S CLAMOUR —

“OH YELLOW SHIRTS.
PARIS IS BURNING.
AN OLD DAME FLIRTS.
HELL HAS YEARNING.
FOR YOUR COHORTS. {@6: Sup: 11 (#268: KANT’s PROLEGOMENA (1783) AS PRIOR
TO THE FRENCH REVOLUTION); Ego: 45 (#312 - *CONTRADICTION*)}
A PAGE OF TURNING. {@7: Sup: 44 (#312 - *CONTRADICTION*); Ego: 46 (#358: KANT’s PROLEGOMENA (1783) AS PRIOR TO THE FRENCH REVOLUTION)}
FRATERNITÉ AU MORTS.”

THAT WAS TO PROHIBIT AN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY THEFT AND ACCORDINGLY
FACEBOOK WILL FACE A DAMAGES CLAIM EQUIVALENT TO THE COST OF NOTRE DAME
REPAIRS ($1.5 billion in donations and growing):

#36 - PYTHAGOREAN INTELLECTUAL TETRAD
#260 - INNER MAIDEN OR MARRIAGEABLE MAID
#325 - TOTAL MAGIC SUM #65 - SOLDIER
#330 - HRUMACHIS WITH 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 INCLUSIONS (#288)
#329 - NEW YEARS DAY AS IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA OF 1783 AS PRIOR TO
FRENCH REVOLUTION...

*PRO* *DOMO* MEANING *FOR* *HIS* *OWN* *CAUSE* is a relative value term
of SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE PRINCIPLE and this notion is not
contradictory to the fact that clergy theorists have subjected Western
society to very heavy exogamous constraints and to a marked (largely
*PRO* *DOMO*) *VALORIZATION* OF *CELIBACY* [Joseph Morsel ( with the collaboration of Christine Ducourtieux), The History (of the Middle
Ages) is a #444 - *SPORT* OF COMBAT ... Reflections on the aims of the
History of the Middle Ages intended for a society in which even the
students of history's question, 2007]

The Latin *PRO* *DOMO* *SUA* ("for his #311 - *HOUSE*") is derived from
a speech of Cicero, pronounced in 57 BCE, before the *PONTIFFS* to
obtain the restitution of his property confiscated by the tribune
Clodius, during his condemnation to the exile.

[140] It was then reported to you, O priests, and after that it became a
common topic of conversation, how he, with preposterous language with ill-omened auspices, at times interrupting himself, doubting, fearing, hesitating, pronounced and did everything in a manner wholly different
from that which you have recorded as proper in your books. It is,
indeed, not very strange that in doing an act of such wickedness and
such insanity, even his audacity could not wholly repress his fear.

In truth, if no #390 - *ROBBER* was ever so savage and inhuman, as, when
he had plundered temples, and then, having been excited by dreams or
some superstitious feelings, consecrated some altar on a desert shore,
not to shudder in his mind when compelled to propitiate with his prayers
the deity whom he has insulted by his wickedness; what do you suppose
must have been the agitation of mind of that plunderer of every temple,
and of every #311 - *HOUSE*, and of the whole city, when he was
consecrating one single altar to avert the vengeance due to his
numberless acts of wickedness? [141] He could not possibly (although the insolence of power had elated his mind, and although he was armed by
nature with incredible audacity) fail to blunder in his proceedings, or
to keep constantly making mistakes, especially when he had a priest and
teacher who was compelled to teach before he had learnt himself. There
is great power, not only in the divinity of the immortal gods, but also
in the republic itself. When the immortal gods saw the guardian and
protector of their temples driven away in a most wicked manner, they
were unwilling to quit their temples and to remove into his #311 -
*HOUSE*. Therefore they alarmed the mind of that most insensible man
with fear and anxiety. But the republic, although that was banished at
the same time with myself, was still constantly present to the eyes of
its destroyer, and from his excited and kindled frenzy was constantly
demanding my restoration and its own. What marvel then is it, if he,
urged on by the insanity of fear and drawn on headlong by wickedness,
was neither able properly to perform the ceremonies which he had begun,
nor to utter one single word in due order with proper solemnity? [THE
ORATIONS OF MARCUS TULLIUS CICERO, LITERALLY TRANSLATED BY C. D. YONGE,
B. A. LONDON. GEORGE BELL & SONS, YORK STREET, COVENT GARDEN. 1891]

BINOMIAL APPARATUS {#36}:
@1 <--- INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN {#64 = 8 x 8 as #260 MAGIC SUM}
@5 <--- ANCHOR {PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY PROTOTYPE}
#65 - *SOLDIER* {@1 RETENTION + #64 ELEMENTS}
#175 - *MARRIAGE*

-- TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND TWEEDLEDEE[D] --

"TWEEDLEDUM AND TWEEDLEDEE.
SHAMEFUL PARAGON AS IDOLATRY.
KING OF JEWS NAILED TO A TREE.
WOE SOME TALE OF SANCTIMONY.

MEASURED THINGS DOTH CONVEY.
GUARDIANS TO HEAVEN'S THRONE.
JUXTAPOSED BIAS UNTIL THIS DAY.
AGAINST HEAVEN'S SON FIRSTBORN.

NONE DENY HOLOCAUST'S CAUSE.
JUSTICE AND COMPASSION LOATH.
ENDURING MILLENNIA SANS PAUSE.
ALTAR #419 - *SLAUGHTER* MADE BY OATH {ie. *MARRIAGE* *VOW* MOMENT: #353
as [#30, #200, #3, #70, #10, #40] = rega` (H7281): {UMBRA: #4 as #273 %
#41 = #27} 1) a moment; 2) for a moment, at one moment... at another
moment with prep; 3) in a moment}."

As we'd previously raised in our correspondence to this COUNTY COURT
within APPEALS AP-18-0609 / AP-18-0775, the starting point of our
concerns lays with a #364 - QUESTION upon what is the actual focal
impetus to their SWEARING of *OATHS* {

"391" : [6, 2, 300, 2, 6, 70, 5],
"413" : {
"0" : [6, 30, 300, 2, 70, 5],
"1" : [30, 300, 2, 6, 70, 5]
}

AS 8 JUNE 2017 CHERISHED MOTHER STATUE PLAQUE INSTALLATION

} as being made in the circumstance against the autonomy of the person
(#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL) but entirely to:

'I *SWEAR* BY HIM WHO THE TETRAKTYS (@1 - RETENTION + @5 - CENTRE OF
VALUE? + #65 - *DODECAHEDRON* / *SOLDIER* + #175 - *ICOSAHEDRON* /
*MARRIAGE* = #10 - TETRAKTYS) FOUND, WHENCE ALL OUR WISDOM SPRINGS AND
WHICH CONTAINS PERENNIAL NATURE'S FOUNTAIN, CAUSE AND ROOT.'

"ANYONE WHO FOR FALSE REASONS OF MERCY DEVIATES FROM THIS CLEAR
PRINCIPLE IS AIDING {H5826: `azar / help: #273}, WILLINGLY {H7521:
ratsah / accept: #273} OR UNWILLINGLY {H7589: she'at / despiteful: #273;
H4784: marah / rebel: #273; H6696: tsuwr / besiege: #273}, THE
DISSOLUTION OF THE STATE." [Adolf Hitler's Table Talk IDEA: (7 JUNE
1942) @235, page #519]

I was just about to say that the Notre Dame event of 15 April intersects
with Kant’s category @329 as dual assignment to 1 January

@5 - FORMULA OF KANONICOS {GK: ΚᾸΝΟΝῘΚΌΣ #352 / #329 - 1ST JANUARY "INTER GRAVISSIMAS PASTORALIS OFFICII NOSTRI CURAS…" PAPAL BULL ISSUED
BY POPE GREGORY XIII ON 24 FEBRUARY 1582} PRINCIPLES: @123 / #2188 -
SECTION III (?) <— JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT / #5 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE AS DISCRIMINATING NORM {PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY} @2 - SYNTHESIS;

KANONICOS@[
κ, {@1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20)},
α, {@2: Sup: 21 (#41); Ego: 1 (#21)},
ν, {@3: Sup: 71 (#112); Ego: 50 (#71)},
ο, {@4: Sup: 60 (#172); Ego: 70 (#141)},
ν, {@5: Sup: 29 (#201); Ego: 50 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%32})},
ι, {@6: Sup: 39 (#240); Ego: 10 (#201)},
κ, {@7: Sup: 59 (#299); Ego: 20 (#221)},

ς {@9: Sup: 5 (#352); Ego: 38 (#329)}
] // *AMONG* *THE* *MOST* *SERIOUS* *DUTIES* *OF* *OUR* *PASTORAL* *OFFICE*…

That is eight PAPAL BULLS and the other SEVEN relates to DUTCH DISCOVERY
OF AUSTRALIA on 26 October 1616 AO - YEAR OF THE ORDER OF TEMPLARS which
were disbanded by PAPAL BULL because of SODOMY and the Knights Templars
which is a Catholic military order. And this KNIGHTS TEMPLARS ORDER is different to that of the British monarchy and was instituted before the
seven had concluded.

In essence it wipes the authority of Catholic Church city state out
since the Pythagorean Binomial Stasis consists of 8 paired elements
totalling #36 as the category of Roman Empire governance for the 15
April event

The knights Templars order gave a blessing to The Australian terrorist
whom slaughtered 50 persons on 15 March and It involves our ANZAC
identity and so affects everyone.

I just the same day as the Notre Dame fire and prior to it sent an email
on the subject of why 36 journalists and news media organisations ought
not be charged with contempt of court over Cardinal PELL’s trial

And the argument which I made described that the indictment of TREASON /
PRO DOMO (a MOTHER REFUSED COMMUNION due to wearing a RAINBOW SASH as a
breach of the FIRST PRINCIPLES of #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL associated
to QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER 1900) in relation to refusal of communion by then ARCHBISHOP GEORGE PELL on 31 May 1998.

I think that on the argument advanced, I saved 36 journalists and news
media organisations a very expensive legal bill. So yes I am successful
in that argument and we ought to wait for the Queen’s birthday honours
list ...

We began PART 6 dated 25 MARCH 2019 as the closing phase of our FILING SUBMISSIONS by bringing the COURT's attention to the incontrovertible
premise that the objective and prudent opinions which we have submitted
upon "SPECIFICITIES OF NON-FACTUALITY BEING THEN GROUNDS FOR COUNTY
COURT APPEAL AS CASE NUMBER: AP-18-0609 AGAINST A PUBLIC AUTHORITY'S
INFIDELITY TO WAR #288 - MEMORIAL COMMEMORATIONS DUE TO ALIGNMENT WITH A FOREIGN POWER" were made in association to those of a pre-eminent United Kingdom Supreme Court judge and member of the Queen’s Privy Council in
1924 as the person MUIR MACKENZIE whom signed under WARRANT OF THE
SOVEREIGN our nation’s LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900.

WIKIPEDIA CONVEYS OF KENNETH MUIR MACKENZIE, 1ST BARON MUIR MACKENZIE AS
THE MOST LIKELY SIGNATORY: Muir Mackenzie was Clerk to the Crown in
Treasury from 1885 to 1915 and served as Permanent Secretary to the Lord Chancellor from 1890 to 1915. He has joint author with Montague
Johnstone Muir Mackenzie and Charles John Stewart of The Public Trustee
Act, 1906, with rules, fees and official forms (1908).

He was appointed a *QUEEN'S* *COUNSEL* in 1887 and a Bencher of
Lincoln's Inn in 1891. In accordance with Most Honourable Order of the
Bath (formerly the Most Honourable *MILITARY* Order of the Bath) as a
British order of chivalry founded by George I on 18 May 1725. This Order consists of the Sovereign (currently Queen Elizabeth II), the Great
Master (currently The Prince of Wales), and three Classes of members of
which he was made a Companion (CB) in 1893, a Knight Commander (KCB) in
1898 and a Knight Grand Cross (GCB) in 1911 and in 1915 he was raised to
the peerage as Baron Muir Mackenzie, of Delvine in the County of Perth.

The Order of the Bath is the fourth-most senior of the British Orders of Chivalry, after the *MOST* *NOBLE* *ORDER* *OF* *THE* *GARTER*, the Most Ancient and Most Noble Order of the Thistle, and the Most Illustrious
Order of Saint Patrick (dormant). Recipients of the Order are now
usually senior *MILITARY* officers or senior civil servants.
Commonwealth citizens who are not subjects of the Queen and foreign
nationals may be made Honorary Members.

In February 1924 Muir Mackenzie, then aged 78, was appointed a
Lord-in-waiting (government whip in the House of Lords) by Prime
Minister Ramsay MacDonald, head of the first ever Labour government, and
was sworn of the *PRIVY* *COUNCIL* the same year. He held this position
until the government fell in November 1924 and again from 1929 to 1930.
At the time of his death he was the oldest government minister of the
twentieth century. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_Muir_Mackenzie,_1st_Baron_Muir_Mackenzie>

You will no doubt recall from news media reports of 24 APRIL 2008, that
"Former Australian prime minister John Howard appears to have missed out
on joining a prestigious British order of knights.

Speculation mounted earlier this year that Howard might be appointed a
Knight Companion of the *MOST* *NOBLE* *ORDER* *OF* *THE* *GARTER* - the
oldest order of British chivalry - when Queen Elizabeth II announced any
new additions.

Howard was a staunch monarchist during his term as Australia's second longest-serving prime minister.

The deaths of former British prime minister Sir Edward Heath and Mount
Everest conqueror Sir Edmund Hillary left two places open in the
exclusive order.

But the Queen announced on Wednesday those vacancies would be filled by
Lord Luce, who was Lord Chamberlain from 2000 to 2006, and Sir Thomas
Dunne, Lord-Lieutenant of Hereford since 1977 and chairman of the Lord Lieutenants Association. Their appointments take the number of Companion Knights to the maximum 24.

The Queen also announced her grandson, Prince William, would join other
members of his family as a Royal Knight Companion of the Most Noble
Order of the Garter.

Members of the Royal family are additional to the 24 Knights Companion.
New members of the order, established in 1348 by Edward III [AND NOTING
THE SEVEN PAPAL BULLS AS APPERCEPTION RELATING TO THE COUNTERPOISED
CATHOLIC KNIGHTS TEMPLAR MILITARY ORDER WERE ESTABLISHED FROM 1139 CE TO
1312 CE WITH THE LATER DURING THE REIGN OF EDWARD II KING OF ENGLAND
FROM 1307 UNTIL HE WAS DEPOSED IN JANUARY 1327], are customarily
announced on St George's Day, England's national day on 23 April.

Its emblem is a blue ribbon or garter worn by men below the left knee
and women on the left arm.

Each year in June a procession and service take place at Windsor Castle
for the order. [Sydney Morning Herald, No knighthood for John Howard, <https://www.smh.com.au/world/no-knighthood-for-john-howard-20080424-288m.html>]

AND WE HAVE ONLY PROVIDED AN INTERPRETATION OF THIS DOCUMENT BEING QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT DATED 29 OCTOBER 1900 AS REDACTION OF IT INTO
A CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE CONVEYING THE TRINOMIAL METASTASISED
FOUNDATIONAL AND UNIVERSAL (GLOBAL) ONTIC NECESSITY DESCRIPTORS /
CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING AS THEN AGGREGATIONS SUITABLE FOR A
COMPUTING FUNCTION () SO AS TO DETERMINE COMPLIANCE.

SPECIFICALLY THE OPPORTUNISM FOR NEUTRALISATION RELATING TO THE SEVEN
PAPAL BULLS AND ITS IMPETUS BY RENEWED KNIGHTS TEMPLARS AS EMANATION OF
STATE (RELIGIOUS OR OTHERWISE) IS THE BINOMIAL STASIS AND ITS
*IMMATERIALITY*:

#1 - PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY {#364 - WILL, FREE WILL, CHOICE} as Omne Datum Optimum {#1 - Every perfect gift} (1139 CE)

#4 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY {SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY DYNAMIC: #164 -
FAVOUR, AFFECTION BY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITOR} as Pastoralis Praeeminentiae {#4 - Pastoral Pre-eminence to monarchs} (1307 CE)

#5 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE AS DISCRIMINATING NORM {PRINCIPLE
OF ENQUIRY: #205 - LAST WILL, TESTAMENT BY AGGREGATIONS AS OPTIMAL
LETTERS PATENT TEMPLATE OF AGREEMENT WHICH IS ONTIC / MATHEMATICAL AND
SUITABLE FOR A GLOBAL SAPIENT ECONOMY} as Faciens misericordiam {#5 -
Granting forgiveness} (1308 CE)

THAT THE PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY IS IN FAVOUR OF EUROPEAN MONARCHS
GIVEN THE PAPAL AUTHORITY IS ONLY A BINOMIAL {@1 - RETENTION, @5 -
CENTRE OF VALUE} STASIS AS EMANATION OF THE STATE:

Pastoralis praeeminentiae was a papal bull issued by Pope Clement V on
22 November 1307 to all Christian monarchs. It ordered the arrest of all Knights Templar and to seize their properties on behalf of the church.
Clement was forced to support the campaign against the Templars by
Philip IV of France, who owed them a great deal of money and had
initiated the first arrests against the Templars on 13 October 1307.

Despite the papal request, not all the monarchs complied immediately,
most notably, Edward II of England [AND NOTING THE SEVEN PAPAL BULLS AS APPERCEPTION RELATING TO THE COUNTERPOISED CATHOLIC KNIGHTS TEMPLAR
MILITARY ORDER WERE ESTABLISHED FROM 1139 CE TO 1312 CE WITH THE LATER
DURING THE REIGN OF EDWARD II KING OF ENGLAND FROM 1307 UNTIL HE WAS
DEPOSED IN JANUARY 1327] who at first refused to believe the
allegations, but later carried out the order. Following the arrests, a
period of trials was sanctioned against the Templars, enforced by
*TORTURE* and pain-induced confessions.

<-- *THIS* *IS* *A* *ABROGATION* *BREACH* *OF* *THE* *FIRST* *PRINCIPLE*
*AS* *FREE* *WILL* *BEING* *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *ENQUIRY* {#364}:

#364 x 6 = #2184
#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 - CATHOLIC LITURGICAL CYCLE

AND THEREFORE IS THEN SUBJECT {ie. Pope Clement V was forced to support
the campaign by Philip IV of France} TO THIS 4 BCE DEPICTION OF THE
TRINOMIAL METASTASISED BASIS TO STATES #81 / #369 SUCH THAT THE POPE IS ALARMED AT THE PROSPECT THAT THE VATICAN CITY STATE IS DESTINED TO
BECOME A WARSAW GHETTO FOR MAGGOTS AGAINST DEMOCRACY.

THE BIBLICAL STORY OF WISE MEN AT JESUS BIRTH MAY BE CONSIDERED THE
FOCAL ESTABLISHMENT {ie. *THE* *TETRAGRAM’S* *CORRELATION* *WITH* *THE* *WOMAN* *CONSTELLATION*} OF THIS TEMPORAL MARKER IN HAVING A TRINOMIAL
MEASURE OF JUDGEMENT CORRESPONDENCE THEN TO HIS ACTUAL *DEATH*:

*CAN* *WE* *DETERMINE* *THE* *EXACT* *DAY*?

We can.

And here's how . . .

CLUE #1: THE HIGH PRIESTHOOD OF CAIAPHAS {HE THAT SEEKS WITH DILIGENCE;
ONE THAT VOMITETH}

The gospels indicate that Jesus was crucified at the instigation of the
first century high priest named Caiaphas (Matthew 26:3-4, John 11:49-53).

We know from other sources that he served as high priest from A.D. 18 to
36, so that puts Jesus' death in that time frame.

But we can get more specific. Much more.

CLUE #2: THE GOVERNORSHIP OF PONTIUS {MARINE; BELONGING TO THE SEA}
PILATE {ARMED WITH A DART}

All four gospels agree that Jesus was crucified on the orders of Pontius
Pilate (Matthew 27:24-26, Mark 15:15, Luke 23:24, John 19:15-16).

We know from other sources when he served as governor of Judea--A.D. 26
to A.D. 36--so we can narrow down the range by several years.

But how are we going to get it down to a specific day and year?

CLUE #3: AFTER "THE FIFTEENTH YEAR OF TIBERIUS {THE SON OF TIBER} CAESAR"

The Gospel of Luke tells us when the ministry of John the Baptist began:
In the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar . . . the word of
God came to John the son of Zechariah in the wilderness [Luke 3:1-2].

This picks out a specific year: A.D. 29.

Since all four gospels depict the ministry of Christ beginning after
that of John the Baptist had begun (Matthew 3, Mark 1, Luke 3, John 1),
this means that we can shave a few more years off our range.

The death of Christ had to be in a range of seven years: between A.D. 29
and 36.

CLUE #4: CRUCIFIED ON A FRIDAY

All four gospels agree that Jesus was crucified on a Friday (Matt.
27:62, Mark 15:42; Luke23:54; John 19:42), just before a Sabbath, which
was just before the first day of the week (Matthew 28:1, Mark 16:2, Luke
24:1, John 20:1).

We know that it was a Friday because it is referred to as "the day of preparation"--that is, the day on which Jews made the preparations they
needed for the Sabbath, since they could not do any work on that day.
Thus thus cooked food in advance and made other necessary preparations.

The Jewish Encyclopaedia states: Friday, as the forerunner of Shabbat,
is called "'Ereb Shabbat" (The Eve of Sabbath). The term "'ereb" admits
of two meanings: "evening" and "admixture" (Ex. xii. 38); and "'Ereb
Shabbat" accordingly denotes the day on the evening of which Sabbath
begins, or the day on which food is prepared for both the current and
the following days, which latter is Sabbath.

The idea of preparation is expressed by the Greek name paraskeué, given
by Josephus ("Ant." xvi. 6, § 2) to that day (compare Mark xv. 42; Luke
xxiii. 54; Matt. xxvii. 62; John xix. 42). In Yer. Pesaḥim iv. 1 the day
is called "Yoma da-'Arubta" (Day of Preparation) [Jewish Encyclopedia,
s.v., "Calendar"].
That eliminates six of the days of the week, but there were still quite
a few Fridays between A.D. 29 and 36.

Can we figure out which one?
CLUE #5: A FRIDAY AT PASSOVER

The gospels also agree that Jesus was crucified in conjunction with the
annual feast of Passover (Matthew 26:2, Mark 14:1, Luke 22:1, John 18:39).
Here we encounter a momentary complication, because Matthew, Mark, and
Luke describe the Last Supper on Holy Thursday as a Passover meal
(Matthew 26:19, Mark 14:14, Luke 22:15). That would suggest that Good
Friday was the day after Passover.

However, when describing the morning of Good Friday, John indicates that
the Jewish authorities had not yet eaten the Passover meal:

Then they led Jesus from the house of Caiaphas to the Praetorium [ie.,
Pilate's palace]. It was early. They themselves did not enter the
Praetorium, so that they might not be defiled, but might eat the
passover. So Pilate went out to them [John 18:28-29a].

That suggests that the Passover would have begun on sundown Friday.
There are a number of ways of resolving this. For example, some have
suggested that Jesus and his disciples used a different calendar than
the Jewish authorities, and we know that there were different calendars
in use in first century Judaism.

It's also possible that Jesus just advanced the date of the Passover celebration for him and his disciples. I mean, they were already
convinced he was the Messiah and the Son of God. If he says, "We're
celebrating Passover today," and it's a day earlier than most people,
they'd just go with that. (Note that he made other modifications to the ceremony, such as instituting the Eucharist in the midst of it.)

And there are other solutions.

However, regardless of what Jesus' movement did, we can look to John's statement about the Jesus' captors as an indication of what the Jewish authorities or the mainstream Jewish practice was: They were celebrating
a Passover beginning on what we would call Friday evening.

That lets us narrow down the range of possible dates to just a few. Here
is a complete list of the days between A.D. 29 and 36 on whose evenings Passover began:

• Monday, April 18, A.D. 29
• Friday, April 7, A.D. 30
• Tuesday, March 27, A.D. 31
• Monday, April 14, A.D. 32
• Friday, April 3, A.D. 33
• Wednesday, March 24, A.D. 34
• Tuesday, April 12, A.D. 35
• Saturday, March 31, A.D. 36

As you can see, we have just two candidates left: Jesus was either
crucified on April 7 of A.D. 30 or April 3 of A.D. 33.

Which was it?

The traditional date is that of A.D. 33. You will find quite a number of
people today advocating the A.D. 30 date.

Do the gospels let us decide between the two?

CLUE #6: JOHN'S THREE PASSOVERS

The Gospel of John records three different Passovers during the ministry
of Jesus:

• Passover #1: This is recorded in John 2:13, near the beginning of
Jesus' ministry.
• Passover #2: This is recorded in John 6:4, in the middle of Jesus'
ministry.
• Passover #3: This is recorded in John 11:55 (and frequently mentioned
afterwards), at the end of Jesus' ministry.

That means that the ministry of Jesus had to span something over two
years. A fuller treatment would reveal that it spanned about three and a
half years, but even if we assume it began immediately before Passover
#1, the addition of two more Passovers shows that it lasted more than
two years at a bare minimum.

That means the A.D. 30 date is out.

There is not enough time between the fifteenth year of Tiberius
Caesar--A.D. 29--and the next year's Passover to accomodate a ministry
of at least two years.

The numbers don't add up.

As a result, the traditional date of Jesus' death--Friday, April 3, A.D. 33--must be regarded as the correct one.

Can we be even more precise?
CLUE #7: "THE NINTH HOUR"

Matthew, Mark, and Luke each record that Jesus died about "the ninth
hour" (Matthew 27:45-50, Mark 15:34-37, Luke 23:44-46).

"The ninth hour" is what we, today, would refer to as 3:00 p.m.

This allows us to narrow down the time of Jesus' death to a very
specific point in history:

AROUND 1500 HOURS ON FRIDAY, 3 APRIL, 33 A.D.

3 JANUARY + #91 = SATURDAY 4 APRIL 33 AD

4 x #91 = #364 DAY / YEAR OF THE JERUSALEM TEMPLE SERVICE: 24 x 7 x 13 =
#2184 - ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOGONIC PRINCIPLE

#41 - ONTIC NECESSITY PROSCRIPTIONS: #205 - PRINCIPLE OF THE PERSISTENCE
OF SUBSTANCE ☯️ / ✡️ #164 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY AS CONSTITUTING: #369 - DISCRIMINATING NORM (HUMAN NATURE) BEING THE ORGANISATIONAL
PREMISE OF #123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY BY THE EXERCISE OF INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS AS #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL

3 JANUARY *PERIAPSIS* PROTOTYPE: *HOMOIOS* {#420 - VAULT OF THE HEAVENS, FIRMAMENT AS BINDING EARTH TO THE HEAVENS / #322 - FREE CITIZENS,
SOVEREIGN PEOPLE; POPULAR GOVERNMENT, *DEMOCRACY*; POPULAR ASSEMBLY} / *HETEROS* {#404 - KEEP SECRET / #314 - PURPLE / MAGUS} / *TORAH* {#369 -
DIADEM / #337 - NAZARITE / CONSECRATED ONE}

3 JULY *APOAPSIS* PROTOTYPE: *HOMOIOS* {#330 - FRIEND / REBELLIOUS /
#410 - YESHUA / KING} / *HETEROS* {#352 - A PROVING TRIAL / MARY / #421
- EXTREME WICKEDNESS} / *TORAH* {#373 - FROM TRUTH INTO ERROR / #472 -
CURSE}


EXCERPT FROM EMAIL TO STATE / FEDERAL ATTORNEY GENERALS & MINISTER FOR
DEFENCE / ANZAC 2018 COMMEMORATIONS (HE WAS IN PARIS ON 11 NOVEMBER
2018) ASSISTING THE PRIME MINISTER @ 1627 / 1636 HOURS ON 15 APRIL 2019
TITLED:

"CORRECTION (11 JUNE 2000 AS CROWN IMPLICATIONS ON VIABILITY OF STATE AS COMMONWEALTH) THAT THE NEWS MEDIA CANNOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OF COURT
ORDERS RELATING TO THE REPORTING OF COURT HEARINGS OF CARDINAL PELL
BECAUSE THERE IS AN ALLEGED TREASON / PRO DOMO CLAIM RELATING TO 31 MAY
1998 REFUSAL OF COMMUNION"

MARION STATUE DIALOG WITH ARTIST @ 1739 HOURS ON MONDAY 28 MAY 2018

DOLF: "Can I ask for what purpose you are *LIGHTING* *CANDLES* ma'am?"

ARTIST: "Sorry."

DOLF: "For what purpose are you *LIGHTING* *CANDLES*?"

ARTIST: "Umm"

DOLF: "Why aren't you at the BOER WAR memorial celebrating our ah ...
our ah Australian! Oh you're the artist aren't you ma'am?"

ARTIST: "(laughs) I'm Brenda."

DOLF: "You're the artist."

ARTIST: "Nice to meet you."

DOLF: "Now..."

ARTIST: "What happened is um, the mother in Ireland died and their
service in Ireland is at 7 o'clock tonight."

DOLF: "What. Whose? Is that [statue] after a particular person?"

ARTIST: "Yeah Cathy McMahon."

DOLF: "So this [statue] was created in representation of ..."

ARTIST: "This here ... lighting the candles. Wanting to get the candles
all lit at the start of her service."

DOLF: "Okay. It's a Catholic [memorial] service is it?"

ARTIST: "Umm. I['m] not [entirely sure]. I think she is in the
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH*."

DOLF: "Yes. Is this statue related to her in any manner?"

ARTIST: "Yes she is a mother."

DOLF: "Is she the mother depicted [by] the statue."

ARTIST: "No it depicts. The statue depicts all mothers [of which *OUR*
*LADY* [meaning: NOTRE DAME (the French term added later)] is the
exemplar]."

DOLF: "Yes. Yeah. The problem is that with the BOER WAR Memorial on the
31 May ..."

ARTIST: "Yes"

DOLF: "... I hugged a mother [at] refusal of Communion at Saint
Patrick's Cathedral in Melbourne on 31 May 1998."

ARTIST: "Really."

DOLF: "And she was refused communion because she was wearing a rainbow
sash."

ARTIST: "Oh really."

DOLF: "For no other reason. So I have an objection for it. *NOW*
*WOULD* *YOU* *DO* *ME* *A* *FAVOUR* *TO* *APPEASE*, *TO* *BALANCE*
*THE* *KARMA* *OF* *THINGS*. Because..."

...

DOLF: "... I'm going to take the council to court over this particular
matter. Because there is no object of respect at the BOER WAR Memorial."

ARTIST: "So what are you doing taking this to court?"

DOLF: "I'm taking this and the BOER yeah ... this is part of that. This
is part of *ANZAC* *DEFAMATION* which I have been subject to.

When a mother weeps for her children..."

ARTIST: "But this is what this is."

DOLF: "Yeah that is exactly what our 'LEST WE FORGET' poem is all about."

ARTIST: "So why are you against this?"

DOLF: "I'm against this because I happen to be JEWISH and ..."

ARTIST: "Oh okay my darling yes..."

DOLF: "And this is a MARION statue. Now if you really want to IRISH
persons its the WASHER WOMAN that was the person who was most ..."

ARTIST: "No no..."

DOLF: "The WASHER WOMAN in IRISH society was subject to more impunity
than any other woman within IRISH society."

ARTIST: "But you know it's interesting that you say that you're um ah
... JEWISH because the man that led this through the COMMONWEALTH games
... through the COMMONWEALTH government was JEWISH."

DOLF: "Yes but he should know better we don't ... they don't allow
statues in their TEMPLE precinct. And the circumstance that we have is
that I'm of DUTCH heritage and the [INTERNATIONAL] KNIGHTS TEMPLAR which
was formed in 2015 are associated with the ORDER that [DUTCH EXPLORER]
DIRK HARTOG signed the PEWTER PLATE with. So if you want to *TALK*
*ABOUT* *ERECTIONS* [*OF* *COMMEMORATIVE* *MERIT*] DIRK HARTOG signed it
as AO and their were SEVEN PAPAL BULLS associated with my INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY.

As the RIGHT OF WOMEN which is the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS."

ARTIST: "So why are you against this? Why are you going to bring this
into your argument?"

DOLF: "Because WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE was the RIGHT of the exercise of
VOLUNTARY WILL in political life and this [statue] is not."

ARTIST: "What do you mean?"

DOLF: "This is not."

ARTIST: "What do you mean?"

DOLF: "Women in IRELAND have just been [granted the right of *ABORTION*]
..."

ARTIST: "No no hang on a moment.."

DOLF: "Women in IRELAND ... this was put here on SAINT PATRICK'S DAY of
all people. Of all places."

ARTIST: "But I chose that."

DOLF: "You should not have done that. Its representing [only the] IRISH..."

ARTIST: "No it's not. No it's not."

DOLF: "Well because that ... there was no PLAQUE here on the day that it
was [unveiled] ..."

ARTIST: "No but I didn't. I wasn't able to get it ..."

DOLF: "Let me finish..."

ARTIST: "No but you let me finish. I wasn't able ..."

DOLF: "There was no PLAQUE here on the day it was installed."

ARTIST: "Yes there was."

DOLF: "No there wasn't."

ARTIST: "I'm sorry SIR I unveiled the PLAQUE."

DOLF: "I'm sorry ma'am but I took pictures. And I took the picture on
the 8 JUNE when the PLAQUE was unveiled and then I went to the BOER WAR MEMORIAL and there were tributes there as well.

So that's good day to you ma'am."

[walking away]

Had it not be for our rational belief and sapient intellectual property
our nation’s statehood would have been consumed in that holocaust
against 850 years of history.

THUSLY IT EXHIBITS A CLEAR MENS REA RELATING TO:

SOVEREIGN / MARRIAGE DYNAMIC (TRADITION)

v's

SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY DYNAMIC

AS IMPETUS FOR THE NOTRE DAME MAELSTROM WHICH BEING AN ASSAILMENT
AGAINST 850 YEARS OF STATE / SOVEREIGN HISTORY WOULD HAVE BY DEFAULT
*ROLLED* *BACK* *TO* ITS KNOWN STASIS: @1, @5, #65 - SOLDIER, #175 -
MARRIAGE

*THUS* *WE* *CONCLUDE* *A* *HIGH* *PROBABILITY* *THAT* *THE* *FIRE*
*WAS* *A* *DELIBERATE* *CAUSE* *CÉLÈBRE* *ASSAILMENT* *AGAINST*
*SOVEREIGN* *DEMOCRATIC* *NATIONS*.

In our opinion the BINOMIAL APPARATUS as the occidental perspective of PERENNIALISM (including ISLAM) having by the immateriality of its STASIS
which defines a SOVEREIGN / MARRIAGE dynamic may in some circumstances
have a predisposition towards judgementalism by impetus of narcissistic self-justification as being an auto-intoxication in a self bestowed
dignity as a ontological self-delusion due to an infatuation with the

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)