XPost: alt.history.ancient-egypt, soc.culture.egypt, alt.culture.egyptian XPost: alt.egyptians.copts
I include the EGYPTIAN COPTIC CHURCH in this censure as well...
Whether its haughty self entitled Greek lawyers or the *GREEK*
*ORTHODOX* *CHURCH* as a priesthood of sycophantic fraudsters, when do
these NAZI SCUM { @1, @5, #65, #175}, think enough is enough and that
they might show a proper respect for OUR NATION's FIRST PRINCIPLES which
is circumscribed by terms derived from HEBREW / GREEK biblical lexicon?
The *GREEK* *ORTHODOX* *CHURCH* here as *SLANDERERS* AND *DISHONESTY*
which is both the GREEK PIETY AND THEIR PERSONA, have recently tried to
obtain legislative protections for such which is their perverse binomial nomenclature as anthropology that isn't IMAGEO DEI but FASCIST...
THERE WILL NEVER BE PEACE BETWEEN US AS TO HELL WITH YOU...
On 3/9/19 3:32 pm, dolf wrote:
No you have me confused with the fascist philosophy
of Christos Iliopolous...
SMS TO CHRISTOS @ 0819 HOURS ON 3 SEPTEMBER 2019: “Christos,
I saw your news event item within the Gippsland Times of this week relating to the Maffra Association of Philosophy having a presentation on Theodor ADORNO @ Macalister Hotel commencing 1100 hours on 7 September 2019
Since he espouses “a theory that both rejected positivism and avoided reinstating traditional metaphysics”
There doesn’t seem to be any merit in attending this session since the traditional metaphysical understanding is derived from a binomial nomenclature as ONOMANTIC conception of number rather a trinomial metastasised consciousness conception such as Kant’s noumenon.
Perhaps another time...
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Queen%27s%20Will%20For%20Sapient%20Economy.pdf>
SMS TO CHRISTOS @ 0853 HOURS ON 3 SEPTEMBER 2019: “And I’ve looked at your
Facebook page which commenced 4 May 2019.
Given presentations of Epicurus and Aristotle it would appear that you are neo-platonic: @1, @5, #65, #175 and therefore inherently anti-Semitic so
its a waste of my time.”
SMS TO CHRISTOS @ 1425 HOURS ON 3 SEPTEMBER 2019: “How dare you sully the place of my birth with your Greek fascism ...
<http://freedomhousing.com.au/about_us.php>
corella <cockatoo@aussieisp.net.au> wrote:
A novel approach to masturbation on your part. Mental masturbation.
-- THE QUEEN'S *RESERVE* (APODIDOMI v's DIDOMI) RIGHT RELATING TO A SAPIENT ECONOMY AS FULL POWER AND AUTHORITY FROM TIME TO TIME TO REVOKE, ALTER, OR AMEND THESE OUR LETTERS PATENT RELATING TO BINOMIAL STASIS (ROMAN
GOVERNANCE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION IS ONLY THAT) OF COLONIES AS EMANATION OF STATE INTO A FEDERATION AS COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 3 September 2019
DOLF @ 0922 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2019: "It was the Sovereign’s will... how dare you regard such as trash."
SINEAD YOUNG @ 1241 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2019: "Incorrect, the Queen is a Constitutional Monarch. She can advise the Government only. The Queen is unable to express a political opinion but is on record as leaning toward Europe. If I had to guess I think she advised against prorogation because
she has a history of promoting stability."
DOLF @ 1251 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2019: "Not so, as a Constitutional Monarch Queen Victoria instituted Letters Patent upon advice of Privy Council to coalesce binomial stasis (ROMAN GOVERNANCE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION IS ONLY THAT) colonies as emanation of State into a federation as Commonwealth of Australia.
Such Privy Council formally advises the sovereign on the exercise of the Royal Prerogative and whilst proroguing as such was defined by Act of Parliament in 2011 (or thereabouts) the Sovereign still possesses such capacity in prudent circumstances.
I have 24 years more infatuation with Queen Victoria’s Letters Patent than you do—and what a marvel such is...
YOUTUBE: “I. AM. TALKING! (Doctor Who)”
<https://youtu.be/Pa74e8oAvIM>
If you have a look at the dates of 9 to 13 September and 14 October at the following URL then you might get some idea of ER II’s will.
<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>
Clearly ER II has set a course which is distinct to binomial stasis of
ROMAN EMPIRE / CATHOLIC GOVERNANCE and we expect all of the EUROPEAN UNION
to follow...
Our former Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull had prorogued the Australian
House of Representatives until 4 December 2017 ...
YOUR ROMAN #371 - EMPEROR HAS NO #439 - CLOTHES AND HIS GROTESQUE ANTHROPOLOGY IS AN INSENSIBILITY TO #322 - DEMOCRATIC PRINCIPLES = @45 - I
AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG + @102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS + @175 - MARRIAGE (I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR).
<https://youtu.be/Zcq1huLPc68>
HANS CHRISTIAN ANDERSON’S TALE WAS PUBLISHED PRIOR TO QUEEN VICTORIA’S REIGN AS THE SECOND LONGEST SERVING MONARCH.
H4910@{
@1: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#1); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#1),
@2: Sup: 41 - RESPONSE: YING (#42); Ego: 40 - LAW/MODEL: FA (#41),
@3: Sup: 17 - HOLDING BACK: JUAN (#59); Ego: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#98),
@4: Sup: 47 - PATTERN: WEN (#106); Ego: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#128),
Male: #106; Feme: #128
} // #371
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #370 % #41 = #1 - To Guide with Names, Reason's Realisation;
I-Ching: H58 - Joy, Open, Lake; Tetra: 24 - Joy;
THOTH MEASURE: #1 - Oh thou of long strides, who makest thine appearance in Annu; I am not a doer of wrong.
#VIRTUE: If it is Center (no. #1), then yang begins.
#TOOLS: With Center (no. #1), it begins.
#POSITION: If it is Response (no. #41), then yin is born.
#TIME: With Full Circle (no. #2), it wheels back.
#CANON: #45
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_45@{
@1: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#1); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#1),
@2: Sup: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#3); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#2),
@3: Sup: 43 - ENCOUNTERS: YU (#46); Ego: 41 - RESPONSE: YING (#43),
@4: Sup: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#91); Ego: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}),
Male: #91; Feme: #45
} // #45
#371 as [#1, #40, #300, #30] = mâshal (H4910): {UMBRA: #0 as #370 % #41 = #1} 1) to rule, have dominion, reign; 1a) (Qal) to rule, have dominion; 1b) (Hiphil); 1b1) to cause to rule; 1b2) to exercise dominion;
"AND TO RULE-H4910 OVER THE DAY AND OVER THE NIGHT, AND TO DIVIDE THE LIGHT FROM THE DARKNESS: AND GOD SAW THAT IT WAS GOOD." [Genesis 1:18]
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) AS IDEA @371: "It is a common excuse, which these false friends of ordinary common sense (which they extol on occasion, but usually despise) are accustomed to using, that they say:
There must in the end be some propositions that are immediately certain,
and for which not only no proof, but indeed no account at all need be
given, since otherwise there would never come an end to the grounds for one’s judgments; but in proof of this right they can never cite anything else (other than the principle of contradiction, which is however
inadequate for establishing the truth of synthetic judgments) that is undoubted and can be ascribed directly to ordinary common sense, except for mathematical propositions: e.g., that two times two makes four, that
between two points there is only one straight line, and still others.
These judgments are, however, worlds apart from those of metaphysics. For
in mathematics, everything that I conceive through a concept as possible I can make for myself (construct) by means of my thought; to one two I successively add the other two, and myself make the number four, or I draw
in thought all kinds of lines from one point to the other, and can draw
only one that is self-similar in all its parts (equal as well as unequal).
But from the concept of a thing I cannot, with all my powers of thought,
draw forth the concept of something else whose existence is necessarily connected with the first thing, but I must consult experience; and,
although my understanding provides me a priori (though always only in relation to possible experience) with the concept of a connection of this sort (causality), I nevertheless cannot exhibit this concept in intuition a priori, like the concepts of mathematics, and thus exhibit its possibility
a priori; rather, this concept (together with principles of its
application), if it is to be valid a priori – as is indeed required in metaphysics – always has need of a justification and deduction of its possibility, for otherwise one does not know the extent of its validity and whether it can be used only in experience or also outside it.
Therefore in metaphysics, as a speculative science of pure reason, one can never appeal to ordinary common sense, but one can very well do so if one
is forced to abandon metaphysics and to renounce all pure speculative cognition, which must always be knowledge, hence to renounce metaphysics itself and its teaching (on certain matters), and if a reasonable belief is alone deemed possible for us, as well as sufficient for our needs (perhaps more wholesome indeed than knowledge itself). For then the shape of things
is completely altered.
Metaphysics must be science, not only as a whole but also in all its parts; otherwise it is nothing at all, since, as speculation of pure reason, it
has a hold on nothing else save universal insights. But outside
metaphysics, probability and sound common sense can very well have their beneficial and legitimate use, though following principles entirely their own, whose importance always depends on a relation to the practical.
That is what I consider myself entitled to require for the possibility of a metaphysics as science." [pages 121 to 122]
AND THE TETRA META DESCRIPTOR PROTOTYPES CAN CIRCUMSCRIBE ANY LANGUAGE—SO THERE IS NOTHING YOU CAN SAY TO CONTRAVENE SUCH SOVEREIGN WILL... GET USED
TO IT PLEB.
KRASSENSTEIN BOTHERERS: “Vote Blue No Matter Who! {@1: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#77); Ego: 29 - DECISIVENESS: TUAN (#29)}
The nation may depend on it. {@2: Sup: 76 - AGGRAVATION: CHU (#153); Ego:
80 - LABOURING: CH'IN (#109)}”
Dear KRANSSENSTEIN BOTHERERS if you do take the blue pill—the story ends, with you waking up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe.
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RhlXqYiTz2Q>
However if you'd taken the red pill—you'll stay in Wonderland, and I'll show you how deep the rabbit hole goes. Remember: all I'm offering is the #471 - TRUTH as [#30, #1, #40, #400] ---> #441 is an UMBRAL (THRESHOLD)
that is distinct from its @186 - ONTIC OBLIGANS as EPISTEMOLOGICAL PREMISE.
If we are to consider that beyond the notion of Roman Governance conveying
a binomial nomenclature proscription of anthropology as faux imago dei
which is distinct from a trinomial metastasised consciousness instantiation of homo [ios] sapien [t] there is also an existing distinction between monetary systems (ie. pound sterling v’s euro):
"AND HE SAID-G2036 UNTO THEM, RENDER-G591 THEREFORE-G5106 UNTO CAESAR-G2541 THE THINGS WHICH BE CAESAR'S-G2541, AND UNTO GOD-G2316 THE THINGS WHICH BE GOD'S-G2316." [Luke 20:25]
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?bible:luke@20:25>
The key word here is APODIDOMI v's DIDOMI and how this relates to the
NOTION: *RESERVE* TO OURSELVES OUR HEIRS AND SUCCESSORS, FULL POWER AND AUTHORITY FROM TIME TO TIME TO REVOKE, ALTER, OR AMEND THESE OUR LETTERS PATENT, AS TO US OR THEM SHALL SEEM MEET:
@168 <— BINOMIAL STASIS SOURCE OF IMPEDANCE
@215 <— SELF #312 - *CONTRADICTION* MINUS #81 - *JUXTAPOSED* *PRINCIPLES* *OF* *SOVEREIGN* {6.5.5.41.0} / *AUTONOMY* {3.5.5.41.0}} EQUALS #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL {MEMORIAL #288 - REMEMBRANCE {#288 - #215 = #73 - CANNOT BE CHANGED}} {ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA: @215 - 12 MAY 1942}
@157 <— IMPETUS FOR VEXATIOUS IMPERATIVES {#360 - ANNUAL / CENTENNIAL 2018 ASSEMBLY AS BEER-SHEBA PLOT {#360 - #157 = #203 as [#2, #1, #200] = bᵉʼêr (H875): {UMBRA: #8 as #203 % #41 = #39} 1) well, pit, spring}}
@130 <— I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3} AS MENS REA
@175 <— MARRIAGE OATH (SHEBA)
@185 <-- EMPOWERMENT
@115 <-- HOSPITABLE (POTUS / MOSES SEAT / DIGNITY ROYAL)
@181 <-- *TO* *CAUSE* *ONESELF* *TO* *BE* *BLESSED* *OF* *GOD* / @180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE
@45 = #1371 as [#70, #200, #500, #400, #1, #200] = osphŷs (G3751): {UMBRA: #2 as #1370 % #41 = #17} 1) the hip (loin); 1a) to gird, gird about, the loins; 2) a loin, the (two) loins; 2a) *THE* *PLACE* *WHERE* *THE*
*HEBREWS* *THOUGHT* *THE* *GENERATIVE* *POWER* (*SEMEN*) *RESIDED*;
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?lexicon:G591>
G1325@{
@1: Sup: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#4); Ego: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#4),
@2: Sup: 9 - BRANCHING OUT: SHU (#13); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#9),
@3: Sup: 13 - INCREASE: TSENG (#26); Ego: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN
(#13),
@4: Sup: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#28); Ego: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE
(#83),
@5: Sup: 42 - GOING TO MEET: YING (#70); Ego: 40 - LAW/MODEL: FA (#123),
@6: Sup: 47 - PATTERN: WEN (#117); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#128),
@7: Sup: 16 - CONTACT: CHIAO (#133); Ego: 50 - VASTNESS / WASTING: T'ANG
(#178),
@8: Sup: 24 - JOY: LE (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}); Ego: 8 -
OPPOSITION: KAN (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND {%31}),
@9: Sup: 74 - CLOSURE: CHIH (#231); Ego: 50 - VASTNESS / WASTING: T'ANG
(#236),
Male: #231; Feme: #236
} // #236
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #868 % #41 = #7 - Intentional Reversal, Dimming Radiance; I-Ching:
H12 - Obstruction, Stagnation, Selfish persons; Tetra: 56 - Closed Mouth;
THOTH MEASURE: #7 - Oh thou whose eyes pierce like swords, who makest thine appearance in Sechem; I commit no fraud.
#VIRTUE: With Ascent (no. #7), coming up against plainness?
#TOOLS: With Pattern (no. #47), increasing artifice.
#POSITION: With Youthfulness (no. #12), having no knowledge, but
#TIME: With Fullness (no. #38), having a surplus.
#CANON: #104
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_104@{
@1: Sup: 7 - ASCENT: SHANG (#7); Ego: 7 - ASCENT: SHANG (#7),
@2: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#61); Ego: 47 - PATTERN: WEN (#54),
@3: Sup: 66 - DEPARTURE: CH'U (#127); Ego: 12 - YOUTHFULNESS: T'UNG (#66),
@4: Sup: 23 - EASE: YI (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}); Ego: 38 -
FULLNESS: SHENG (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
Male: #150; Feme: #104
} // #104 <-- FROM TIME TO TIME APPOINTED / FROM TIME TO TIME, UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THESE OUR LETTERS PATENT, ADMINISTER THE GOVERNMENT OF OUR
SAID COMMONWEALTH
<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
#236 as [#4, #5, #4, #70, #40, #5, #50, #8, #50] = dídōmi (G1325): {UMBRA: #0 as #868 % #41 = #7} 1) to give; 2) to give something to someone; 2a) of one's own accord to give one something, to his advantage; 2a1) to bestow a gift; 2b) to grant, give to one asking, let have; 2c) to supply, furnish, necessary things; 2d) to give over, deliver; 2d1) to reach out, extend, present; 2d2) of a writing; 2d3) to give over to one's care, intrust,
commit; i) something to be administered; ii) to give or commit to some one something to be religiously observed; 2d4) to give what is due or
obligatory, to pay: wages or reward; 2d5) to furnish, endue; 2e) to give; 2e1) to cause, profuse, give forth from one's self; i) to give, hand out lots; 2e2) to appoint to an office; 2e3) to cause to come forth, i.e. as
the sea, death and Hell are said to give up the dead who have been engulfed or received by them; 2e4) to give one to someone as his own; i) as an
object of his saving care; ii) to give one to someone, to follow him as a leader and master; iii) to give one to someone to care for his interests;
iv) to give one to someone to whom he already belonged, to return; 2e5) to grant or permit one; i) to commission;
"AND [#117 / #351 - SATAN] SAITH UNTO HIM, ALL THESE THINGS WILL I
GIVE-G1325 THEE, IF THOU WILT FALL DOWN AND WORSHIP ME." [Matthew 4:9]
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?lexicon:G1325>
THE ONTIC SUBSTITUTION VALUE #117 - IS IT PRUDENT OR IS IT EVIL?
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) ON IDEA @B117: "Jurists, when they are discussing rights and claims, distinguish in a legal action the question of what is right as quid juris ("I QUESTION WHICH LAW APPLIES") from the question that concerns the matter of fact as (quid facti), and, as they require proof of both, they call the first proof, which is supposed to establish the right or legal claim, a deduction. We use a number of
empirical concepts without anyone’s objecting, and we consider ourselves, even without a deduction, entitled to attribute to them a sense and a presumed signification, since we always have experience at hand for demonstrating their objective reality. *THERE* *ARE* *ALSO*, *HOWEVER*, *USURPATORY* *CONCEPTS*, *SUCH* *AS* *LUCK* *OR* *FATE* [*OR* *THE* *IMMATERIALITY* *OF* *BINOMIAL* *STASIS* *ONTIC* *SUBSTITUTION* THAT SEEKS
TO TAKE (A POSITION OF POWER OR IMPORTANCE) ILLEGALLY OR BY FORCE],
*WHICH*, *THOUGH* *THEY* *MEET* *WITH* *ALMOST* *UNIVERSAL* *FORBEARANCE*, *ARE* *NONETHELESS* *SOMETIMES* *CHALLENGED* *WITH* *THE* *QUESTION*: quid juris, at which point there arises no small embarrassment concerning their deduction, because no appeal can be made to any clear legal ground, either from experience or reason, through which the right to use them would be
made evident.
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Papal%20War%20Commemorations%20Intellectual%20Property%20Theft%201.png>
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Papal%20War%20Commemorations%20Intellectual%20Property%20Theft%202.png>
However, among the various concepts that form the very diverse fabric of human cognition there are some that are destined for pure, a priori use (entirely independent of all experience), and the right of their use always has need of a deduction; since proofs from experience are not sufficient to establish the legitimacy of such use, one wants indeed to know how these concepts can relate to objects that they do not obtain from any experience. Hence I call the explanation of the way in which concepts can relate a
priori to objects the transcendental deduction of those concepts, and I distinguish it from an empirical deduction, which shows how a concept is acquired through experience and reflection on experience, and which
concerns therefore not the legitimacy of the possession, but the fact of
how possession came about.
Now we have indeed two sorts of concepts, completely different in kind,
that nonetheless agree with one another in that both of them relate to objects entirely a priori: namely, the concepts of space and time, as forms of sensibility, and the categories, as concepts of the understanding. To attempt an empirical deduction of these concepts would be completely idle labor, because the differentia of their nature consists in the very fact
that they relate to their objects without having to borrow any- thing from experience for the representation of those objects. If therefore a
deduction of these concepts is needed, it will always have to be transcendental." [Pages 166 to 167]
In our opinion the BINOMIAL APPARATUS as the occidental perspective of PERENNIALISM having by the immateriality of its STASIS which defines a SOVEREIGN / MARRIAGE dynamic may in some circumstances have a
predisposition towards judgmentalism by impetus of narcissistic self-justification as being an auto-intoxication in a self bestowed dignity as a ontological self-delusion due to an infatuation with the mirroring of its various ONTIC characteristic elements expressed therein and perhaps not realising that it is also subject to the @205 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE {#873 - PROBITY OF THE DIGNITY ROYAL (LETTERS PATENT)} and @82 / #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY (SECTION IX) in being a lawful EMANATION OF STATE AS METHODOLOGY which itself conforms to the dialectic of the #2184 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC COSMOGONIC PRINCIPLE that are encapsulated by the @164 / #3273 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY (SECTION VIII) and the HISTORICAL
CHRISTIAN WEDDING VOW.
"I, *NAME* *OF* *BRIDE*, #312 - *TAKE* *THEE* {ie. A WILLING, WILL}, *NAME* *OF* *GROOM* to be my #2184 - *LAWFULLY* {ie. LAWS OF NATURE} wedding husband. To have and to hold #273 - *FROM* *THIS* *DAY* *FORWARD* {ie. SUCCESSIVELY IN ORDER}, for richer or poorer, in sickness and in health, to love and #364 - *OBEY* until death do we part, today I pledge my faithfulness."
(#175 - *MARRIAGE*) ONTIC_OBLIGANS_175@{
@1: Sup: 22 (#22 - POINT TO REVERSAL?, HUMILITY'S INCREASE); Ego: 22 (#22), <— #713 - PLOT EVIL AND *BE* *SILENT*, *KEEP* *QUIET* BY IRRATIONAL IMPOSTS OCCASIONING SILENCE #105 as [#5, #4, #40, #50, #6] / #444 as [#400, #4, #600] / #506 as [#6, #4, #6, #40, #40, #400, #10] WITH AN INTENTION
*TO* *MAKE* *SILENT* *CAUSE* *TO* *DIE* AS DERANGEMENT WITHIN THE PROVISION OF GOODS AND SERVICES BEING EXEMPLAR BY AN UNLAWFUL LIQUOR BAN OF A YEAR EXCLUSION ACCOMPANYING A SYSTEMATIC INTENTION TO SLANDEROUSLY CONVEY, MORPHOLOGICALLY IMPOSE, TO TRANSMOGRIFY OR TO DEPRIVE A PERSON OF A
RATIONAL MIND AS THE SOCIAL NORM DEPICTED WITHIN THE SIMIAN MONKEY SCREAMING.NUTBAG@GMAIL.COM PSYCHO-SEXUAL SLANDER MURAL AS CONSTITUTING
WITHIN ITSELF A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY.
@2: Sup: 3 (#25 - WHAT'S BEHIND IT ALL?, IMAGING THE MYSTERIOUS); Ego: 62 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}) <— LACK OF ADHERENCE TO THE AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE OF COHESION BY MILITANT {#65 - SOLDIER} CAMPAIGN OF SOCIAL EXCLUSION / VIOLENT ASSAULTS / PROPERTY DAMAGE / PUBLIC SLANDER
{@173 + I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST} / PERJURY AS CONTEMPT TO SECTION
IX AS THE ONTIC FIRST PRINCIPLES "DIEU ET MON DROIT" OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT {@115 + (DIGNITY ROYAL / POTUS / MOSES SEAT)} WITH AN INTENTION TO ENFORCE AN ABHORRENT AND DEPRAVED HISTORICAL REVISIONISM OF
ONLY ANZAC WAR #288 - *REMEMBRANCE* *BEING* *EXCLUSIVELY* *A* *PREJUDICE*
@3: Sup: 23 (#48 - FORGETTING KNOWLEDGE); Ego: 20 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}), <— TRINOMIAL METASTASISED ONTIC @102 - TIME TO @104 - TIME SUBSTITUTION WITH THE IMMATERIALITY OF THE BINOMIAL STASIS #105 / #114 BY SAINT GEORGE STATE / RELIGIOUS ANZAC DAY INFIDELITY AGAINST SECTION IX OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT {@115 + (DIGNITY ROYAL / POTUS / MOSES
SEAT)}
FROM TIME {@102 as [#6, #40, #30, #20, #6] = malkûw (H4437): {UMBRA: #63
as #96 % #41 = #14} 1) *ROYALTY*, *REIGN*, *KINGDOM*; 1a) *ROYALTY*, *KINGSHIP*, *KINGLY* *AUTHORITY*; 1b) *KINGDOM*; 1c) *REALM* (*OF* *TERRITORY*); 1d) *REIGN* (*OF* *TIME*);
TO TIME {@104 as [#6, #7, #40, #50, #1] / #114 as [#6, #7, #40, #50, #10,
#1] = zᵉmân (H2166): {UMBRA: #16 as #97 % #41 = #15} 1) *A* *SET* *TIME*, *TIME*, *SEASON* / @104 = *TO* *GET* *AS* *A* *POSSESSION*, *ACQUIRE*, *INHERIT*, *POSSESS* / *TO* *POSSESS* *ONESELF*
23 APRIL 2019 - BRITISH NATIONAL HOLIDAY OF SAINT GEORGE
25 APRIL - ANZAC HERITAGE AS LOYAL SUBJECTS OF THE BRITISH MUST RESPECT AND REPRESENT THOSE PRINCIPLES
@168 <— BINOMIAL STASIS SOURCE OF IMPEDANCE
@215 <— MEMORIAL #288 - REMEMBRANCE {#288 - #215 = #73 - CANNOT BE CHANGED} @157 <— #360 - ANNUAL / CENTENNIAL 2018 ASSEMBLY AS BEER-SHEBA PLOT {#360 - #157 = #203 as [#2, #1, #200] = bᵉʼêr (H875): {UMBRA: #8 as #203 % #41 = #39} 1) well, pit, spring}
@130 <— I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3} AS MENS REA
@175 <— MARRIAGE OATH (SHEBA)
@185 <-- EMPOWERMENT
@115 <-- HOSPITABLE (POTUS / MOSES SEAT / DIGNITY ROYAL)
@166 <-- TO BE SAVED (IN BATTLE), BE VICTORIOUS;
@45 = #1356 as [#20, #1, #300, #1, #20, #100, #10, #9, #800, #40, #5, #50]
= katakrínō (G2632): {UMBRA: #2 as #1302 % #41 = #31} 1) to give judgment against, to judge worthy of punishment; 1a) *TO* *CONDEMN*; 1b) *BY*
*ONE'S* *GOOD* *EXAMPLE* *TO* *RENDER* *ANOTHER'S* *WICKEDNESS* *THE*
*MORE* *EVIDENT* *AND* *CENSURABLE*;
"THEY SHALL GROW NOT OLD, AS WE THAT ARE LEFT GROW OLD;
AGE SHALL NOT WEARY THEM, NOR THE YEARS #1356 - *CONDEMN*.
AT THE GOING DOWN OF THE SUN AND IN THE MORNING
WE WILL REMEMBER THEM." [Laurence Binyon, published in London in the Winnowing Fan; Poems of the Great War in 1914. The verse, which became the League Ode, was already used in association with commemoration services in Australia in 1921]
29 APRIL - ANGLICAN CHURCH CELEBRATES SAINT GEORGE'S FEAST DAY
30 APRIL - ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH CELEBRATES SAINT GEORGE'S FEAST DAY AS THE
8 JUNE ATTEMPT TO IMPOSE A SUBSTITUTED ETHIC UPON OUR WAR DEAD CENTENNIAL
AND USURP THE SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY DYNAMIC OF THE STATE:
@102 as [#6, #40, #10, #6, #600] / #105 as [#5, #10, #40, #10, #600] or
[#10, #40, #10, #40, #5] / #315 - *RISK* *OF* *ONTIC* *TRANSITION* BY THE SAINT GEORGES STATE / RELIGIOUS CONFLICT DUE TO EASTER 21 APRIL 2019 AND
FOR CATHOLICS 30 APRIL *INTO* *THE* *CUSTODY* *OF* *A* *FOREIGN* *POWER* as [#10, #40, #10, #40, #5] = yôwm (H3117): {UMBRA: #38 as #56 % #41 = #15} 1) day, time, year; 1a) day (as opposed to night); 1b) day (24 hour period); 1b1) as defined by evening and morning in Genesis 1; 1b2) as a division of time; i) a working day, a day's journey; 1b3) days, lifetime (pl.); 1b4) time, period (general); 1b5) year; 1b6) temporal references; i) today; ii) yesterday; iii) tomorrow;
@4: Sup: 13 (#61 - VIRTUOUS HUMILITY AT USING 'BENEATH'); Ego: 71 (#175
- I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}), <-- THE BEERSHEBA PLOT AS KNOWLEDGE OF TREASON AS AN INDICTABLE OFFENCE PROHIBITED UNDER SECTION 9A CRIMES ACT OF VICTORIA AS CONSIDERATION THE ANZAC HERITAGE WAS ALWAYS WHITE-ANTED BY A WHITE #315 - NATIONALISM
Male: #61; Feme: #175
} // #175 - *MARRIAGE*
IN THE CIRCUMSTANCE OF THE SREBRENICA MASSACRE ON 8 JULY 1995 THE
DIALECTICS / DYNAMICS OF IMPULSIVITY is incontrovertibly a WAR CRIME but in the scenario of the BEERSHEBA PLOT it is regarded entirely as a PIETY which is further distracted by the depravity in the spectacle of its consummation as the CHRISTCHURCH MASSACRE ON 15 MARCH 2019 of some 51 persons engaged within piety as the exercise of #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL.
G591@{
@1: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#1); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#1),
@2: Sup: 81 - FOSTERING: YANG (#82); Ego: 80 - LABOURING: CH'IN (#81),
@3: Sup: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#152); Ego: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#151),
@4: Sup: 74 - CLOSURE: CHIH (#226); Ego: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#155),
@5: Sup: 64 - SINKING: CH'EN (#290); Ego: 71 - STOPPAGE: CHIH (#226),
@6: Sup: 21 - RELEASE: SHIH (#311); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#264),
@7: Sup: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#337); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#269),
@8: Sup: 36 - STRENGTH: CH'IANG (#373); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#279),
@9: Sup: 74 - CLOSURE: CHIH (#447); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#317),
Male: #447; Feme: #317
} // #1370
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #1019 % #41 = #35 - Great Guiding Signs?, Virtue of Benevolence; I-Ching: H17 - Following, Allegiance; Tetra: 19 - Following;
THOTH MEASURE: #35 - Oh Tem-sepu, who makest thine appearance in Tattu; I
am not one who curseth the king.
#VIRTUE: As to Gathering (no. #35), it is success.
#TOOLS: With Failure (no. #75), loss of fortune.
#POSITION: With Ascent (no. #7), high ambitions.
#TIME: With Sinking (no. #64), low ambitions.
#CANON: #181
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
@1: Sup: 35 - GATHERING: LIEN (#35); Ego: 35 - GATHERING: LIEN (#35),
@2: Sup: 29 - DECISIVENESS: TUAN (#64); Ego: 75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#110),
@3: Sup: 36 - STRENGTH: CH'IANG (#100); Ego: 7 - ASCENT: SHANG (#117),
@4: Sup: 19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG (#119); Ego: 64 - SINKING: CH'EN (#181 -
I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE
WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
Male: #119; Feme: #181
} // #181
#1370 as [#1, #80, #70, #4, #800, #200, #5, #10, #200] = apodídōmi (G591): {UMBRA: #0 as #1019 % #41 = #35} 1) to deliver, to give away for one's own profit what is one's own, to sell; 2) to pay off, discharge what is due;
2a) a debt, wages, tribute, taxes, produce due; 2b) things promised under oath; 2c) conjugal duty; 2d) to render account; 3) to give back, restore;
4) to requite, recompense in a good or a bad sense;
"AGAIN, YE HAVE HEARD THAT IT HATH BEEN SAID BY THEM OF OLD TIME, THOU
SHALT NOT FORSWEAR THYSELF, BUT SHALT PERFORM-G591 UNTO THE LORD THINE OATHS:" [Matthew 5:33]
Since the SOVEREIGN can define the RENDER-APODÍDŌMI PRINCIPLE by NINE TRINOMIAL ONTIC PRINCIPLES OF NECESSITY, as the discharging of SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE in relation to the PROROGUING of PARLIAMENT she can ensure by doing so that a PROPER TRIBUTE is granted to HER DIGNITY ROYAL with
respects to the establishment of a SAPIENT ECONOMY.
DAVID PLASKITT @ 0449 HOURS ON 1 SEPTEMBER 2019: "Being able to use a thesaurus doesn't make you intelligent, as your posts prove."
YOUTUBE: "Acte I, Athos "Les 3 Mousquetaires" (Clip officiel)"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEFQiBiNlcY>
WE HAD ANTICIPATED THIS CATEGORY: #334 as [#6, #20, #2, #300, #6] = kâbash (H3533): {UMBRA: #14 as #322 % #41 = #35} 1) to subject, subdue, force,
keep under, bring into bondage; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to bring into bondage, make subservient; 1a2) *TO* *SUBDUE*, *FORCE*, *VIOLATE*; 1a3) to subdue, dominate, tread down; 1b) (Niphal) to be subdued; 1c) (Piel) to subdue; 1d) (Hiphil) to bring into bondage;
FOR FURTHER EXPLANATION SEE: "THE GADFLIES OF #322 - DEMOCRACY (SEPTUAGINT: TRANSLATION OF THE SEVENTY INTERPRETERS)" comprising #42 pages and dated 24 to 25 AUGUST 2019
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/The%20Gadflies%20Of%20Democracy.pdf>
@173 + @143 = #321 as [#1, #10, #300, #9, #1] = aitía (G156): {UMBRA: #40
as #322 % #41 = #35} 1) cause, reason; 2) *CAUSE* *FOR* *WHICH* *ONE* *IS* *WORTHY* *OF* *PUNISHMENT*, *CRIME*; 3) charge of crime, accusation;
There is simply too much hysteria and violent action within the HONG KONG / CHINA tensions for the population to rationally grasp the significance of such [action of ours] within affairs of the state and court: *LA* *COUPE* *DES* *MOUSQUETAIRES*
YOUTUBE: “Hunters and Collectors (Holy Grail)”
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nws1K56w8vg>
DOLF @ 0527 HOURS ON 1 SEPTEMBER 2019: "One doesn’t need to actually utilise a thesaurus because unlike you my capacity for apriority cognition {ie. I by nature think in Hebrew and Greek: 24 x 7 x 13 = #2184} has
recourse to a reverse transcriptase inhibitor by which I can intuit your gibberish into language independent meta-descriptor prototypes and if need
be Kant’s prolegomena (1783) as unity of apperception:
YOU SAID: “Being able to use a thesaurus doesn't make you intelligent, {@1: Sup: 35 - GATHERING: LIEN (#35); Ego: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#52)},
as your posts prove. {@2: Sup: 41 - RESPONSE: YING (#76); Ego: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#109: *CONSTITUENT* *SUB*-*CATEGORY* *OF* *THE* *GREEK*
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
