• Re: Chief Mangosutu Buthelezi, 95, Mandela=era Zulu leader

    From Steve Hayes@21:1/5 to All on Sun Sep 24 12:43:21 2023
    XPost: alt.obituaries, soc.culture.south-africa

    On Sat, 9 Sep 2023 08:16:40 -0700 (PDT), That Derek
    <thatderek@yahoo.com> wrote:

    https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/mangosuthu-buthelezi-traditional-zulu-chief-who-played-an-ambiguous-role-during-apartheid-obituary/ar-AA1gt74X

    The Telegraph

    Mangosuthu Buthelezi, traditional Zulu chief who played an ambiguous
    role during apartheid – obituary

    Story by Telegraph Obituaries •
    5h

    Chief Mangosutu Buthelezi, who has died aged 95, was one of the most influential and certainly the most controversial of the black leaders
    who loomed large on South Africa’s political landscape during the
    turbulent years that led to the remarkable peaceful transition to
    democracy in 1994.

    Kate Spade New York Boxxy Padded Leather Crossbody Bag, Black,
    Women's, Handbags & Purses Crossbody Bags & Camera Bags
    Kate Spade New York Boxxy Padded Leather Crossbody Bag, Black,
    Women's, Handbags & Purses Crossbody Bags & Camera Bags

    Always an enigmatic, hypersensitive figure, he attempted to reconcile,
    with varying degrees of success, the dual personalities of a
    traditional Zulu chieftain with that of a forward-looking, enlightened
    modern African statesman who, for many years, saw himself as the
    natural choice as South Africa’s first black president.

    One day would find him in a Soweto stadium, clad in leopard skins and loincloth, exhorting with assegai in hand, throngs of chanting Zulus
    to respect and observe the ferocious warrior traditions of their
    forebears and the legacies of their proud and bloodthirsty monarchs
    like King Shaka from whom he was descended.

    The next evening, perhaps, he would be guest of honour at the smartest
    of Belgravia dinner parties, charming and witty in black tie as he
    held forth eloquently, if at length, on the problems confronting the
    world in general and Africa in particular.

    In both roles, he was an arch conservative, deeply suspicious of
    communism in any form, a firm believer in the free market and
    capitalist values and, no doubt because of his royal ancestry, deeply
    committed to hierarchical, traditional values.

    Such views did not endear him to the African National Congress (ANC)
    then banned in apartheid South Africa with its leaders either in jail
    or in exile. The ANC, and its internal surrogate, the United
    Democratic Front (UDF), were closely aligned with the South African
    Communist Party. Both regarded themselves as revolutionary liberation
    movements in the style of the times. Many aspirant leaders were
    educated and trained military in the old Soviet Union or its
    satellites.

    Successive South African white regimes, clumsily deploying visions of
    the “red menace” to cloak the Afrikaner’s increasingly desperate and beleagured racial policies, saw in Buthelezi a credible ally with a
    large and powerful power base among the Zulus, the country’s largest
    tribal group.

    For years they miscalculated Buthelezi’s intelligence, ambition and
    shrewd grasp of history, in particular the close involvement of his
    ancestors in nearly two centuries of anti-colonial and anti-settler
    resistance. The impis of his maternal great grandfather, King
    Cetshwayo, had outmanoeuvred and crushed the bulk of Lord Chelmsford’s imperial expeditionary army at Isandhlwana in 1879.

    Earlier in the 19th century, Zulu warriors had slaughtered the Boer
    trekker, Piet Retief, and his men as they ventured into the green,
    rolling hills of Zululand. Both defeats were bloodily avenged but
    healthy respect for the Zulu people lingered long in memory and
    legend.

    Buthelezi consolidated his grip on Zululand through his Inkatha
    movement, later to become the Inkatha Freedom Party. Originally an
    unabashedly tribal grouping, Inkatha dominated every aspect of
    government, administration and life in the Zulu heartland. Buthelezi
    was able to exercise to the full his autocratic and arrogant
    tendencies through an elaborate system of patronage.

    And yet he steadfastly resisted the many attempts and lavish
    blandishments by successive National Party governments to persuade him
    to accept the spurious “full independence” as Transkei, Ciskei and
    other tribal homelands had done. He was not, he declared loudly and
    frequently, going to become a puppet of a white regime’s vision of
    “grand apartheid”.

    His notoriously long winded speeches (one was timed at just over four
    hours) contained visionary pearls for those diligent enough to stay
    the course. In the early 1980s he warned that black South Africans
    faced the stark choice between armed struggle and the politics of
    negotiation.

    “This choice cannot be shelved,” he said. “South Africans will either
    be liberated by the forces of violence which will go on to form a
    one-party state and which will be faced with the awesome task of
    reconstructing this country on a foundation of ashes...or will it be
    liberated by democratic forces which achieve the liberation of this
    country through the politics of negotiation which will give rise to a government of national unity.”

    The ANC, committed as it then was to the revolution and to rendering
    South Africa “ungovernable”, remained deeply suspicious of Buthelezi, resenting his influence in Natal and among the tens of thousands of
    migrant Zulu workers living in the barrack-like hostels in townships
    around industrial Johannesburg and the gold mines of the
    Witwatersrand.

    ANC activists moved in force into Natal, organising underground cells
    and recruiting on large scale. They found rich pickings among the
    militant Zulu youth in the urban townships and the universities where
    non-white students were contemptuous of tribal rituals and the
    deep-rooted conservatism of the rural elders who formed the backbone
    of Inkatha.

    They were able to exploit the age-old rivalries between Zulu clans.
    The politicisation of the feuds polarised Zulu opinion in Natal and
    led inexorably to what was a regional civil war between Inkatha and
    ANC supporters. In a decade from the early 1980s and estimated 15,000
    people were killed in political faction fighting. It was by far the
    most bloody period in South Africa’s revolution.

    The bloodshed was clandestinely and crudely fuelled by what became
    known as the “third force”, the apartheid government’s security forces supporting and encouraging Inkatha hotheads in an attempt to undermine
    the ANC. Whether Buthelezi actively sought the help of the apartheid
    government or whether he tacitly accepted the assistance remained a
    bitterly disputed point for decades.

    The evidence was eventually overwhelming that white police and
    military units had trained Inkatha’s young militants and that
    government money had been used to finance Inkatha rallies and the
    creation of an Inkatha aligned trade union movement.

    Buthelezi’s attempts to transform Inkatha into a national political
    force were bedevilled by the labels of “stooge” and “collaborator”
    with which the ANC and other revolutionary groups had sought to
    discredit him. The proud Zulu chief was pushed to the sidelines during
    the negotiations which led to the transition he himself had advocated
    as the only real option for a peaceful South African future.

    He was petulant and troublesome during the protracted Codesa
    (Convention for a Democratic South Africa) negotiations, frequently
    storming out of the talks and forming unlikely alliances with the
    discredited homeland leaders and even white extremist groups in his
    quest to secure a federalist system for the country.


    Nelson Mandela recalled that Buthelezi was one of the first of the
    people he contacted when he was finally released from prison to thank
    him for his long-standing support. “Within ANC circles he was a far
    from popular figure,” Mandela wrote in his memoirs, with
    characteristic understatement. “He was a thorn in the side of the
    democratic movement. He opposed the armed struggle...he campaigned
    against international sanctions and challenged the idea of a unitary
    state of South Africa. Yet Chief Buthelezi had consistently called for
    my release and had refused to negotiate with the government until I
    and other political prisoners were liberated.”

    Mandela took some personal risk, given the hostilities in Natal, by
    visiting Durban shortly after his release. He addressed 100,000 Zulus,
    mainly Inkatha supporters, in a sports stadium. “Take your guns, your
    knives and your pangas and throw them into the sea,” he urged. “End
    this war now!”. His appeal “fell on deaf ears...the fighting and the
    dying continued”.

    Mandela repeatedly attempted to meet Buthelezi personally in his
    efforts to bring an end to the violence but the ANC executive blocked
    his initiative, preferring instead to split the loyalties of the
    traditional Zulu stronghold by wooing the Zulu monarch, King Goodwill Zwelithini. The self-indulgent young monarch, apart from being
    Buthelezi’s nephew, was politically naive and anxious only to cling to
    the lavish trappings of his symbolic office.

    By the time the ANC and its allies had won a sweeping victory in South Africa’s first democratic elections in 1994, Buthelezi stood condemned
    as a “spoiler” and was derided almost as a figure of fun by most of
    the country’s editorial writers and cartoonists. His chiefly pride had
    been wounded and his statute as a putative African statesman deeply
    dented.

    Mandela’s own statesmanship eventually provided some salve for
    traditional pride. The Inkatha movement became the Inkatha Freedom
    Party to contest the first democratic elections and won political
    control of KwaZulu-Natal province. The factional violence subsided.
    President Nelson Mandela invited Buthelezi to join his cabinet as home
    affairs minister, a post he held for more than a decade after
    independence.


    When Mandela and his then deputy, Thabo Mbeki, made their frequent
    trips abroad to herald the new “rainbow nation” they were happy to
    leave the affairs of state in the hands of Acting President Buthelezi.
    It was the closest the Zulu leader was to come to his long-held
    ambition to become the country’s first black ruler.

    Mangosuthu Gatsha Buthelezi was born on August 27 1928 in the rural
    village of Mahlabatini in the hills north of Ulundi, the capital of
    Zulu royalty for centuries. He liked to boast that he was raised in a traditional household, spending hours each day herding cattle and
    learning warrior skills in stick fights with other village boys but he
    was made aware from an early age that his destiny lay in the rigid
    hierarchy of Zulu chieftainship.

    His mother, Princess Constance Magogo Zulu, was the granddaughter of
    King Cetshwayo, the monarch who had routed the British army at
    Islandhwana. His father, Chief Mathole, was the grandson of Chief
    Mnyamana Buthelezi, Cetswhayo’s prime minister. His ancestry was
    linked to to the legendary Zulu kings like Shaka, hailed as founder of
    the Zulu nation and whose military skills, combined with mind numbing brutality, transformed the traditional tribal boundaries of southern
    Africa early in the 19th century.

    A precociously intelligent youngster, Buthelezi was whisked from the
    village primary school to Adams College, a renowned Christian
    missionary school south of Durban. There he matriculated with
    distinction to be admitted to Fort Hare university in the Eastern
    Cape, alma mater of a generation of future African leaders, including
    Nelson Mandela, Oliver Tambo, Govan Mbeki and Sir Seretse Khama.

    Among Buthelezi’s fellow students were Robert Sobukwe, to become
    leader of the militant Pan African Congress (PAC) and Robert Mugabe,
    an intense young firebrand from Zimbabwe. Their arrival at Fort Hare
    in 1948 coincided with the advent to power in South Africa of the
    Afrikaner diehards whose National Party was dedicated to the
    maintenance of white supremacy in South Africa at any cost.

    Fort Hare was awash with revolutionary fervour. Buthelezi, with his
    hereditary pride and rebellious nature, came under the influence of
    Professor ZK Matthews, the black academic who was the intellectual
    driving force behind the ANC. Soon the Zulu chief was a leading
    activist in the ANC Youth League. In 1950 he was among a group of
    students expelled from the university following a series of protests
    and boycotts.

    He was permitted to finish his degree in history and “bantu
    administration” at Natal University, a distinction which gained him a
    job in the Department of Bantu Administration. A few months of lowly
    clerking was enough for Buthlezi and he seized the first opportunity
    to join a firm of Durban attorneys knowing, as Mandela did, that a
    career in law was one of the few career paths then open to aspirant
    black politicians.

    Hereditary demands saw him return to Mahlabatini to be ceremonially
    inducted as head of the Buthelezi tribe, a status that led to him
    being appointed chief executive of the newly-established KwaZulu
    Territorial Authority, then the KwaZulu Legislative Assemble and
    eventually as Chief Minister of KwaZulu. All were political
    appointments approved by Pretoria as part of its policy of dividing
    South Africa into quasi self-governing tribal states.

    This seeming complicity with the apartheid regime raised more than a
    few eyebrows and considerable suspicion among the more revolutionary
    black activists. By now, the ANC, the PAC and other black militant organisations had been banned and their leaders jailed or forced into
    exile. The South African stage was set for a racial confrontation and
    yet here was the leader of the country’s largest tribe seemingly
    conniving with the white minority government.

    Buthelezi, of course, had no intention of following what was then
    known as the Uncle Tom route but his belief was that apartheid had to
    be fought from within. He was determined to build on his own
    unassailable power base among the Zulu people.

    He enjoyed his status as chief, even agreeing to take part – as an enthusiastic extra – in the 1963 film Zulu which starred Michael
    Caine, Stanley Baker and Jack Hawkins. He advised on the script and
    gave his full co-operation to the producers, even though the film gave
    a slant of imperial glory to the stand by British troops at Rorke’s
    Drift after the battle of Isandhlawana.

    At this time, Buthelezi was the only extant and visible black leader
    able to speak out against government policies. Pretoria was obliged to
    indulge him as he was part of the system they had established. Among
    the majority of blacks throughout the country he became something of a
    national hero.

    As the Soviet Union tightened its grip on Africa, where anti-colonial
    sentiment provided a convenient and willing receptacle for Cold War
    strategic and political expansion, Buthelezi remained as outspoken an anti-communist as he was an opponent of apartheid. His views won him
    admiration among conservative groups in the West and he became a
    regular visitor to London, Washington and New York.

    An articulate black leader of a noble and respected African tribe with anti-communist and pro-free market views made him a favourite of
    Western society hostesses. So seductive was he that such entrepreneurs
    and socialites like John Aspinall, the London gambling magnate, moved
    to South Africa and were deeply moved to be made “honorary Zulus”. (It
    must by recorded that although Aspinall put in several appearances at
    Inkatha rallies he chose to live on a large estate high on the slopes
    of Table Mountain, far from the clamour, dust and bloodshed of
    Zululand).

    None of this endeared him to the ANC which was now fomenting violent
    revolution throughout South Africa’s teeming black townships. A
    significant turning point for the country – and for Buthelezi – came
    with the 1976 student uprising in Soweto where most of the deaths were
    caused by Zulu impis, migrant workers in the hostels, rampaging and
    attacking the young protestors in the darkened streets of the township unchecked by the authorities.

    During the years of turmoil that followed, Zulu gangs were held
    responsible for the slaughter of thousands in the townships of the
    Transvaal and throughout Natal, often it seemed with the connivance
    and cooperation of the police and security forces. The violence was
    matched, if not surpassed, by the ANC activists but increasingly the
    names of Inkatha and Buthelezi became linked with counter-revolution
    and thuggery on a massive scale.

    On the political front, Buthelezi became increasingly shrill. He
    claimed that the ANC had declared war on Inkatha, rejecting claims
    that his own movement was responsible for much of the rising death
    toll in Natal and elsewhere. He railed against sanctions being imposed
    on South Africa and in the same breath demanded the release of Nelson
    Mandela before he would negotiate with the government.

    His ambivalent bluff was called when Mandela was finally released and
    the ANC unbanned by President FW de Klerk’s government in 1990. As
    South Africa moved into negotiations which would lead inevitable to
    majority rule, Buthelezi turned to more desperate measures in an
    attempt to secure his status as a putative black leader. These
    included acceptance of overt support from the security forces of an
    apartheid regime realising it was under siege. It was fatal
    politically for the man who would be king and the stain on his
    reputation was never fully removed.

    Once the ANC had swept to power in the elections and Nelson Mandela
    was hailed around the world as a model of statesmanship and racial reconciliation, Buthelezi retreated with no little grace as a gallant
    loser. He worked diligently, though not with great success, at his
    cabinet portfolio at home affairs and, at subsequent elections,
    mounted spirited attacks on the lack of government performance as
    leader of the opposition Inkatha Freedom Party.

    He finally stood down as IFP president in 2019, though he remained a
    member of the South African parliament and traditional prime minister
    in KwaZulu-Natal until his death.

    Autocratic though he remained in his role as Chief of the Zulus,
    Buthelezi never showed any inclination to indulge in the profligate
    displays of personal wealth ritually exhibited by many African
    leaders. His home near Ulundi was owned not by him but by the
    Buthelezi tribe. There he lived in a modest, suburban manner with his
    wife and family, enjoying during limited spare time an exercise
    machine, an impressive collection of classical music and the complete collection of Frank Sinatra albums.

    In 1952 Buthelezi married Irene Thandekile Mzila, a nursing sister
    from Johannesburg, who died in 2019. They had three sons and four
    daughters, of whom two daughters and a son survive him.

    Mangosuthu Buthelezi, born August 27 1928, died September 9 2023

    (reformatted for legibility)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)