Op maandag 15 januari 2024 om 18:21:19 UTC+1 schreef Ian Goddard:
Brotherly Lover wrote:
Since Google Groups' death warrant has been signed, I wonder whether the smart people who follow soc.genealogy.medieval have found a new hangout.No, we just have the old one. Usenet
.
Read and understand this carefully:
You do not need Google Groups.
Hello Ian,
I understand the concern of the original poster as it touched my feeling aswell.
Ever since I first found SGM in 2003 I have used Google (or something before that) to follow and read SGM.
I connected it through a bookmark.
Being a Dutchman the name Usenet does not ring a bell or custom.
Can you explain a dummy how to connect to Usenet to get to SGM?
Hans Vogels wrote:[]
I connected it through a bookmark.
Being a Dutchman the name Usenet does not ring a bell or custom.
Can you explain a dummy how to connect to Usenet to get to SGM?
You will need two things, a service provider (or server or feed) and a[]
Usenet client (or newsreader).
First the server.
First try your ISP. It used to be fairly common, at least in the UK,
that a news feed would be included in the bundle. It's less common now
but my ISP, PlusNet still provides it so that's what I use. In the
past I've used Eternal September at www.eternal-september.org and >Individual.Net at news.individual.net The first is supported by
donations and the second by a subscription which, AFAICR was about a
tenner a year, probably Euro but maybe from the UK GBP but not
expensive. Perhaps other group members can add further recommendations.
Let's pick up with the client. This is a piece of software which
you'll have to install if you don't have it already. As a news-client
is often a component of email clients you might already have it
installed in the form of Thunderbird or some of the lesser known email >clients. (I'm not sure about Outlook but I doubt it will provide news.
I'll look later.)
Wikipedia has a list of internet newsreaders. To repeat the point I
made in the previous post, binary groups are of no interest to us so
there's no advantage in selecting one which features binary capabilities.
Of the Commercial group I've seen Forté Agent recommended in posts in
the past but have no experience. In the FOSS selection SeaMonkey is
what I use. It's the continuation of the old Netscape as a combined
browser and mail/news/RSS client. It continued in development after
Firefox was split out as a stand-alone browser. Thunderbird was also
split out as a stand-alone email/news/rss client. SM and TB share a
lot of their code but recently TB has changed its user interface to a >tab-oriented version. Sylpheed and its successor Claws present the
classic Netscape interface so although I haven't looked at them my >expectation is that they'll be similar in setting up a news feed.
I'll leave you to select and install your own choice. You've already
signed up with a service as per my previous post, haven't you? If you >haven't we'll not get much further until you have.
The next section is a blow-by-blow account of setting up a newly
installed TBird.
You should initially get a dialog box about the number of headers on
the server. Currently mine, for s.g.medieval, stands at over 163,000.
There is an option to download all of them and another, preselected, to >download the last N where N defaults to 500 but can be changed. Think
very carefully whether you want to download the full collection. If
you're moving over from GG you'll have seen recent messages. The last
500 will probably be more than enough so tick mark the reast as read
and click OK.
Yes, the term "usenet" isn't necessarily known even by many of those who
use it; they tend to talk about "news" or "newsgroups".
Outlook Express was much criticised, but IMO was quite a reasonable mailIts encouragement of top-posting is probably responsible for it becoming
and news client (its main disadvantage, IMO, being that it encouraged top-posting, but that's become the norm these days anyway)
Hans Vogels wrote:
Op maandag 15 januari 2024 om 18:21:19 UTC+1 schreef Ian Goddard:
Brotherly Lover wrote:
Since Google Groups' death warrant has been signed, I wonderNo, we just have the old one. Usenet
whether the smart people who follow soc.genealogy.medieval have
found a new hangout.
.
Read and understand this carefully:
You do not need Google Groups.
Hello Ian,
I understand the concern of the original poster as it touched my
feeling aswell. Ever since I first found SGM in 2003 I have used
Google (or something before that) to follow and read SGM. I
connected it through a bookmark. Being a Dutchman the name Usenet
does not ring a bell or custom.
Can you explain a dummy how to connect to Usenet to get to SGM?
That's a good question. I'll cross-post it to other groups as there
will be others who want to know that.
You will need two things, a service provider (or server or feed) and
a Usenet client (or newsreader).
First the server.
One thing to know is that there isn't and never was some master news
server controlling the rest. No, Not even Google. The system
started with US university server operators arranging to link with
each other, neighbour to neighbour by modem on phone line. This was
even before they had Internet or its predecessor, DARPANet let alone
before Google existed*. They would connect at intervals and pass
batches of files, including mail and news. to each other. News files
were passed from server to server so that a news item starting out on
one server would permeate to the rest. Once it became available the
internet replaced dial-up lines. All servers were equal except
possibly in the variety of groups they would support and the length
of time they would retain messages for their users to read. That is
still the situation today - whichever one you choose has no more and
no less status than any other.
Another thing to know is that the original news consised of text
messages. That's what the original servers handled. Eventually binary
news came into being. AFAICS they are largely used to shunt around
media files, very likely pirated or worse. Soc.genealogy groups are
still text only so there's no value in using a server which supports
binary groups. Text only is good enough and, given that binary files
are larger, text only groups are likely to be cheaper, even supported
by donations only.
Of the Commercial group I've seen Forté Agent recommended in posts in
the past but have no experience. In the FOSS selection SeaMonkey is
Its encouragement of top-posting is probably responsible for it becoming
the norm in which case it has a lot to answer for. But its main disadvantage from my PoV was that it didn't run on Linux. Or maybe that
was an advantage.
I use Thunderbird as I can subscribe to multiple newsgroups. If one[]
has problems I can easily switch to another.
I'm not sure about Outlook but I doubt it will provide news.
On 16 Jan 2024 in soc.genealogy.britain, Ian Goddard wrote:
I'm not sure about Outlook but I doubt it will provide news.
Outlook WILL NOT provide news. The mercifully end-of-lifed Outlook
Express used to. (Outlook and Outlook Express, in spite of the similarity
of names, never were the same program.)
Nice writeup, by the way.
On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 14:05:53 +0000, Ian Goddard
<ian_ng@austonley.org.uk> wrote in soc.genealogy.medieval:
Of the Commercial group I've seen Forté Agent recommended in posts in
the past but have no experience. In the FOSS selection SeaMonkey is
I use Forte Agent for a while. My version is dated 2002 and is still
working !
There were/is 2 versions : Free Agent and Forté Agent. Free Agent will support only newsgroups and Forté Agent is also an email reader.
You can filter Usenet by the address or subject line but not by the
content but the new versions may (I don't know but be sure I should
give it a try !). Messages are kept on the computer so you can
archive them yourself.
My only problem is that I don't know if I can switch to a new version
and still keep my 10,000s perhaps 100,000s emails and usenet messages
I have !
Denis
Denis Beauregard wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 14:05:53 +0000, Ian Goddard
<ian_ng@austonley.org.uk> wrote in soc.genealogy.medieval:
Of the Commercial group I've seen Forté Agent recommended in posts
in the past but have no experience. In the FOSS selection
SeaMonkey is
I use Forte Agent for a while. My version is dated 2002 and is still working !
There were/is 2 versions : Free Agent and Forté Agent. Free Agent
will support only newsgroups and Forté Agent is also an email
reader.
You can filter Usenet by the address or subject line but not by the
content but the new versions may (I don't know but be sure I should
give it a try !). Messages are kept on the computer so you can
archive them yourself.
My only problem is that I don't know if I can switch to a new
version and still keep my 10,000s perhaps 100,000s emails and
usenet messages I have !
Denis
They have a support page so you could ask them. But back everything
up before you update!
Ian
Once you download an article from the server using most news readers,
they'll stay on your computer. Most of these were created in the time
of dialup, you would download a list of newsgroups. Disconnect. Select
all the groups you are interested in, connect, and download headers.
You can then choose messages to download based on the header, or you
can download all messages in a group. these days you might as well grab
all the articles in a group. I think Free Agent is still only valid for
30 days before you have to buy a copy. There are free options like PAM, >Claws-mail and a few others but Free Agent or Agent are worth the money
if you're a serious usenet user.
That said, I'm trying to find a half decent web based news client to interface with my news server. I thought there were a few but they seem
few and far between and not updated.
Some newsreader clients could download headers only or headers and
bodies; the one I use lets me choose that on a per 'group basis. It was mainly to cut down on online time and storage; nowadays, as Nigel says,
I can't see any advantage in a header-only approach.
J. P. Gilliver wrote:
Some newsreader clients could download headers only or headers and
bodies; the one I use lets me choose that on a per 'group basis. It
was mainly to cut down on online time and storage; nowadays, as Nigel >>says, I can't see any advantage in a header-only approach.
I doubt that anyone who has been using Google Groups will have been
saving message bodies anyway. Basically there are 3 approaches:
In message <20240119183120.26a4f05b@wibble.sysadmininc.com> at Fri,
19 Jan 2024 18:31:20, Nigel Reed <sysop@endofthelinebbs.com> writes
[]
Once you download an article from the server using most news readers, >they'll stay on your computer. Most of these were created in the
time
Yes and no. Several newsreaders implement "expiry", same as the news
servers - i. e. they discard posts a predefined time after
downloading (or over a defined age based on the posting date); most
(I think all) allow you to mark a post as "keep", i. e. to be kept
not expired. The one I use allows me to set expiry per 'group.
of dialup, you would download a list of newsgroups. Disconnect.
Select all the groups you are interested in, connect, and download
headers.
I think downloading the list of 'groups available isn't done every
connect, but only from time to time. Some - I think earlier versions
of Thunderbird were like this - you had to manually trigger it to get
a new list, which usually came to light when someone posted that they couldn't see a certain 'group, at which point others reminded them to
ask for a new list. I think some server/client combinations had a way
of finding out which new groups had been added recently (it's coming
back to me: I now remember using one where it told me of each new
'group, and asked me if I wanted to take it. Became impractical when
huge numbers of 'groups were being added, but would work again
nowadays).
You can then choose messages to download based on the header, or you
can download all messages in a group. these days you might as well
grab
Some newsreader clients could download headers only or headers and
bodies; the one I use lets me choose that on a per 'group basis. It
was mainly to cut down on online time and storage; nowadays, as Nigel
says, I can't see any advantage in a header-only approach.
all the articles in a group. I think Free Agent is still only valid
for 30 days before you have to buy a copy. There are free options
like PAM, Claws-mail and a few others but Free Agent or Agent are
worth the money if you're a serious usenet user.
I'm pretty certain Free Agent - some versions, anyway - operates indefinitely, as a newsreader at least; Agent just offers more
features (might have been mail). Maybe Free Agent offers you full
Agent features for a short period then falls back.
In message <SOScnTa9TczVdzb4nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> at
Sat, 20 Jan 2024 15:44:07, Ian Goddard <ian_ng@austonley.org.uk>
writes
J. P. Gilliver wrote:
Some newsreader clients could download headers only or headers and >>bodies; the one I use lets me choose that on a per 'group basis. It
was mainly to cut down on online time and storage; nowadays, as
Nigel says, I can't see any advantage in a header-only approach.
I doubt that anyone who has been using Google Groups will have been
saving message bodies anyway. Basically there are 3 approaches:
I imagine any web-based interface like Google Groups doesn't save
anything on the user's machine, other than possibly MIDs. (Well, it
does as long as they keep the "webpage" open, but webpage contents
aren't normally thought of as "saved", though they're obviously on
the user's machine for him/her to read them.)
[]
On Sat, 20 Jan 2024 18:21:21 +0000[]
"J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> wrote:
I imagine any web-based interface like Google Groups doesn't save
anything on the user's machine, other than possibly MIDs. (Well, it
does as long as they keep the "webpage" open, but webpage contents
aren't normally thought of as "saved", though they're obviously on
the user's machine for him/her to read them.)
[]
This is one downside to using a web interface. There's no real way to
keep what you've seen unless you save the webpage and all it's
wonderful HTML junk as well.
On Sat, 20 Jan 2024 07:30:18 +0000
"J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> wrote:
In message <20240119183120.26a4f05b@wibble.sysadmininc.com> at Fri,
19 Jan 2024 18:31:20, Nigel Reed <sysop@endofthelinebbs.com> writes
[]
Once you download an article from the server using most news readers,
they'll stay on your computer. Most of these were created in the
time
Yes and no. Several newsreaders implement "expiry", same as the news
servers - i. e. they discard posts a predefined time after
downloading (or over a defined age based on the posting date); most
(I think all) allow you to mark a post as "keep", i. e. to be kept
not expired. The one I use allows me to set expiry per 'group.
While most newsreaders can expire articles, I'm pretty sure you can
configure them not to if you wish.
You can use NEWGROUPS and it will fetch a list of new newsgroup since a
given date. Most newsreaders will keep a note internally of the last >newsgroup or newgroups fetch.
You can then choose messages to download based on the header, or you
can download all messages in a group. these days you might as well
grab
Some newsreader clients could download headers only or headers and
bodies; the one I use lets me choose that on a per 'group basis. It
was mainly to cut down on online time and storage; nowadays, as Nigel
says, I can't see any advantage in a header-only approach.
Yeah, it was just dialup users who would take advantage of that. These
days the amount of time to download news is negligible.
all the articles in a group. I think Free Agent is still only validI'm pretty certain Free Agent - some versions, anyway - operates
for 30 days before you have to buy a copy. There are free options
like PAM, Claws-mail and a few others but Free Agent or Agent are
worth the money if you're a serious usenet user.
indefinitely, as a newsreader at least; Agent just offers more
features (might have been mail). Maybe Free Agent offers you full
Agent features for a short period then falls back.
I think you have to go back a long long way to get a version that works >without expiry, or maybe even the old versions did and left you with a >limited but useful client.
I finally convinced a fellow sysop to work on a usenet client for the
BBS that'll have a limited but useful set of features for accessing >newsgroups. Web access is still a bit of a mystery, unfortunately.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 546 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 38:42:34 |
Calls: | 10,392 |
Files: | 14,064 |
Messages: | 6,417,182 |