Ron Geffner
·
Follow
3h
Please share this post. Do not allow Mosab Hassan Yousef to be silenced.
His message is too important as the more people that follow his lead
will enhance the likelihood of peace in the Middle East

Icon for on Diplomacy & Warfare
on Diplomacy & Warfare
Posted by
SamsonR
Dec 7
Mosab Hassan Yousef asked the audience: "If you had any information
before Oct 7, would you report it to the authorities to save lives?"


The crowd in the Oxford Union debate voted. About 75% declared they
would let Oct 7 happen. The audience was pro-terror, pro-death.
Many people who viewed that horror from their homes, were Oxford alumni
who attended these debates and stated with incredible frustration that
they no longer recognize that institution.

The Oxford Union is a distinguished institution that has taken part in educating tens of kings, prime ministers, and noble laureates.
How was that place eroded to host an audience that sought to promote a massacre? How did that institute was taken over? How did it manage to
close its gates to Israelis and Jews who feared for their lives to
attend? How come the audience was so homogenous, so disrespectful,
booing and threatening the pro-Israeli speakers? Is that the last
bastion of free speech?

Hassan Mosab Yousef is the son of the founder of Hamas. As an Arab, he
decided to save many lives by informing on Palestinian terror attacks
that were about to happen, targeting Israelis. Yousef did that simply
because he cherish life, unlike most of the Oxford Union audience who
cherish death, precisely like Hamas.


At that moment, the words of Mosab Hassan Yousef echoed so loudly,
putting that institution in a very problematic light. Instead of self-reflection, the debate organizers decided to leave Yousef out of
the YouTube channel. It is called silencing, which is a typical strategy
in many tyrannical states across the Middle East.

This is a wakeup call for Oxford and for the UK.

235K views5.2K upvotes109 shares537 comments
941 views
View 8 upvotes

Profile photo for Ian Gill
Ian Gill
· Dec 7
That’s nothing new for the Oxford union. In the 1930s I believe just
prior to World War II, the Oxford union voted not to go to war against
Hitler. I believe quite a few of them died in the enduing conflict
fighting for the UK.

Profile photo for John Gill
John Gill
· Dec 20
I know many Americans were on the fence in the 30s about the European
problem of Hitler, but even we came around. I can only imagine what the
Oxford crowd must have been telling themselves. As if Hitler wouldn’t
cross the channel?

Profile photo for Alastair Wilson
Alastair Wilson
· Dec 9
“This House will under no circumstances fight for King and Country", was passed in 1933 by 275 votes to 153. The result sparked off a national
outcry in the press, and Winston Churchill denounced it as "that abject, squalid, shameless avowal" and "this ever shameful motion" 75 million
deaths later -…
(more)
Ian Gill
No - “many” would not say the debaters were right. Just a few misguided individuals would believe that… the same type of people who would think
the Holocaust was a good idea and really regret that Hitler and the
Japanese lost. These evils were only stopped by WW2. WW2 was truly a war
of good v evil. There are very few such wars where the choices are as
clearly defined as in WW2.
Profile photo for Tammalyn Brothers
Tammalyn Brothers
· Dec 7
The terrorists play a long game- they don’t worry about immediate
action. They are aware of the weaknesses of Great Britain and the United States. All democracies will be destroyed because they will bide their
time and then simply use the ballot box as a weapon and put their
misogynistic, women hati…
(more)
Profile photo for Sharli Midbar
Sharli Midbar
· Dec 7
Agreed. That was the plan drawn up by the Muslim brotherhood and exposed
in 1992 in the holy Land investigation in the United states. At the time
the Muslim brotherhood's plan was the 25-year-old plan it is taking a
little longer than 25 years but it is speeding forward with great
success aided and…
(more)
Profile photo for Tammalyn Brothers
Travel Zone
What will happen now that (at least thats what is being reported) Asad
has left Syria? Will eygpt, turkey, saudi, qatar etc muscle in?
Profile photo for John Kopcheff
John Kopcheff
· Dec 8
the only way the UK can stop the Islamic political takeover by the
ballot box is to bring in compulsory voting at council and parliamentary levels. With compulsory voting, all UK citizens will be made aware who
the Islamic and non-Islamic candidates are. This will go some way to
negating the very st…
(more)
RIchard Degen
Well said! We stand no chance until Islamic immigration is terminated
Profile photo for Andy Martin
Andy Martin
· Dec 7
“The crowd in the Oxford Union debate voted. About 75% declared they
would let Oct 7 happen.” Judging from all the bag heads and beardies in
the audience, I can’t say I’m surprised that these reptiles voted the
way they did. It should be pointed out however, that it was Yoseph
Haddad who said this, no…
(more)
Profile photo for Donald D'Abrera
Donald D'Abrera
· Dec 7
What did you expect when Europe supported the scum Arafat ? He should
have been arrested and shot for terrorist crimes.

Simon Long
After rejecting Clinton’s peace plans he was punished with about 6
billion in aid, about what his daughter is currently worth.Zahoua, the
daughter of Yasser #Arafat is the only heir to ...Instagram · levananourishment40+ likes · 11 months ago Zahoua, the daughter of
Yasser #Arafat is the only heir to an estimated $8 Billion fortune, owns
an entire street in London.
Profile photo for Sharli Midbar
Sharli Midbar
· Dec 7
My memory might be incorrect but I seem to recall a lot of pressure from
the United States to do that but I forget who the prime minister of
Israel wasn't that time. In hindsight definitely not such a great idea
at the time however rescuing one life was extremely important.

Chrissy Knott
But rescuing that one life has cost the lives of thousands, both Israeli
and Gazan. It's very difficult to know what the right thing to do is
when the enemy takes hostages
Profile photo for Gilbert Mcarthur
Gilbert Mcarthur
· Dec 7
But, of course, in the 1933 the Oxford Union passed a motion (274 /153)
that they would not fight for King and Country. So not much has changed,
has it?

Profile photo for Sharli Midbar
Sharli Midbar
· Dec 8
Isn't that treason even in England?

Profile photo for Tony Fisher
Tony Fisher
· Dec 9
The percentage has changed from 64% to 75%

Profile photo for Neil Wareham
Neil Wareham
· Dec 7
A hero versus moral microbes. Dear western useful idiots, if they manage
to eliminate Israel, next they’ll be after you because you will have
served your purpose.

Profile photo for Allan C
Allan C
· Dec 8
Well said.

Profile photo for Stanciu Sebastian
Stanciu Sebastian
· Dec 23
No, if anything the US would have no launching ground for wars in the ME anymore

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)