• Re: Medieval Coin in Canada Challenges Story of North American Discover

    From William Hyde@21:1/5 to All on Sat Nov 19 14:18:50 2022
    On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 11:58:48 AM UTC-5, a425couple wrote:
    from https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-history-archaeology/medieval-coin-canada-0017528

    Medieval Coin in Canada Challenges Story of North American Discovery


    I thought it was generally accepted that European fishermen were working on the grand banks long before 1492 and that this would inevitably result in some landings on Newfoundland.

    Why anyone would carry a coin worth a month's wages on such a voyage is something
    I don't understand.

    William Hyde

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From a425couple@21:1/5 to William Hyde on Fri Nov 25 10:15:10 2022
    On 11/19/22 14:18, William Hyde wrote:
    On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 11:58:48 AM UTC-5, a425couple wrote:
    from
    https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-history-archaeology/medieval-coin-canada-0017528

    Medieval Coin in Canada Challenges Story of North American Discovery


    I thought it was generally accepted that European fishermen were
    working on the
    grand banks long before 1492 and that this would inevitably result in
    some
    landings on Newfoundland.


    Yes, most of us readers would think this fishing would have resulted
    in landings much before 1492. But,, yet,,, they never claim to have.

    On September 7 2022, I posted on this newsgroup, about this interesting
    book I'd read:
    Terra Incognita: The True Story of How America Got Its Name
    by Rodney Broome
    from
    https://www.amazon.com/Terra-Incognita-True-Story-America/dp/0944638228

    And this very interesting book gives one very possible & likely
    reason. If they had brought in fish from another country (i.e. Iceland
    or Portugal) they would have had to pay the crown a special duty.
    So, is was much cheaper, and profitable for them to have just gone
    out on the open ocean and caught these fish!!
    Strange how government taxes alter the historical record!

    Why anyone would carry a coin worth a month's wages on such a voyage
    is something
    I don't understand.
    William Hyde

    Except, if they were doing major trade transactions!

    So, the prior written records / (fictions!) was that a merchant would
    send his ship from Bristol England, loaded with spoiled wine (vinigar)
    and salt to sea, where they met up with a fishing fleet, and traded
    their cargo for dried / keged / salted / compressed fish, and did
    the trade, and returned.
    Sure sounds like they might have landed on soil and had a trade house!

    What do you think William?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From William Hyde@21:1/5 to All on Sun Nov 27 15:48:36 2022
    On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 1:15:12 PM UTC-5, a425couple wrote:
    On 11/19/22 14:18, William Hyde wrote:
    On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 11:58:48 AM UTC-5, a425couple wrote:
    from
    https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-history-archaeology/medieval-coin-canada-0017528

    Medieval Coin in Canada Challenges Story of North American Discovery


    I thought it was generally accepted that European fishermen were
    working on the
    grand banks long before 1492 and that this would inevitably result in
    some
    landings on Newfoundland.

    Yes, most of us readers would think this fishing would have resulted
    in landings much before 1492. But,, yet,,, they never claim to have.


    As I understand it the idea is that they wanted to keep the fishing grounds as little known as possible. With only a few fishermen there would be no
    question of claiming lands and meeting native resistance. As long as
    the interlopers did not claim large amounts of land for farming relations
    might well have stayed quite peaceful.



    On September 7 2022, I posted on this newsgroup, about this interesting
    book I'd read:
    Terra Incognita: The True Story of How America Got Its Name
    by Rodney Broome
    from
    https://www.amazon.com/Terra-Incognita-True-Story-America/dp/0944638228

    And this very interesting book gives one very possible & likely
    reason. If they had brought in fish from another country (i.e. Iceland
    or Portugal) they would have had to pay the crown a special duty.
    So, is was much cheaper, and profitable for them to have just gone
    out on the open ocean and caught these fish!!
    Strange how government taxes alter the historical record!

    Much of the English trade with Greenland went unrecorded for the same reasons.

    Why anyone would carry a coin worth a month's wages on such a voyage
    is something
    I don't understand.
    William Hyde
    Except, if they were doing major trade transactions!

    So, the prior written records / (fictions!) was that a merchant would
    send his ship from Bristol England, loaded with spoiled wine (vinigar)
    and salt to sea, where they met up with a fishing fleet, and traded
    their cargo for dried / keged / salted / compressed fish, and did
    the trade, and returned.

    I would think the other way around would be more plausible. The English exported fish, and imported wine (and possibly vinegar). Their other big export item was wool, of which Iberia itself had plenty, so I am not sure
    what the English would trade. Possibly they fished, but also bought
    some wine (hence the coins) and the wine was smuggled in.


    Sure sounds like they might have landed on soil and had a trade house!

    What do you think William?

    It sounds plausible. Avoiding customs duties and various regulations was standard practice. In one case Irish customs duties went from 6000 pounds
    to near zero in a couple of decades, though the trade was still doing well. This was circa 1400, when six thousand pounds was a significant sum.

    William Hyde

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Surreyman@21:1/5 to William Hyde on Mon Nov 28 01:10:41 2022
    On Sunday, November 27, 2022 at 11:48:37 PM UTC, William Hyde wrote:
    On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 1:15:12 PM UTC-5, a425couple wrote:
    On 11/19/22 14:18, William Hyde wrote:
    On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 11:58:48 AM UTC-5, a425couple wrote:
    from
    https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-history-archaeology/medieval-coin-canada-0017528

    Medieval Coin in Canada Challenges Story of North American Discovery


    I thought it was generally accepted that European fishermen were
    working on the
    grand banks long before 1492 and that this would inevitably result in
    some
    landings on Newfoundland.

    Yes, most of us readers would think this fishing would have resulted
    in landings much before 1492. But,, yet,,, they never claim to have.
    As I understand it the idea is that they wanted to keep the fishing grounds as
    little known as possible. With only a few fishermen there would be no question of claiming lands and meeting native resistance. As long as
    the interlopers did not claim large amounts of land for farming relations might well have stayed quite peaceful.

    On September 7 2022, I posted on this newsgroup, about this interesting book I'd read:
    Terra Incognita: The True Story of How America Got Its Name
    by Rodney Broome
    from https://www.amazon.com/Terra-Incognita-True-Story-America/dp/0944638228

    And this very interesting book gives one very possible & likely
    reason. If they had brought in fish from another country (i.e. Iceland
    or Portugal) they would have had to pay the crown a special duty.
    So, is was much cheaper, and profitable for them to have just gone
    out on the open ocean and caught these fish!!
    Strange how government taxes alter the historical record!
    Much of the English trade with Greenland went unrecorded for the same reasons.
    Why anyone would carry a coin worth a month's wages on such a voyage
    is something
    I don't understand.
    William Hyde
    Except, if they were doing major trade transactions!

    So, the prior written records / (fictions!) was that a merchant would
    send his ship from Bristol England, loaded with spoiled wine (vinigar)
    and salt to sea, where they met up with a fishing fleet, and traded
    their cargo for dried / keged / salted / compressed fish, and did
    the trade, and returned.
    I would think the other way around would be more plausible. The English exported fish, and imported wine (and possibly vinegar). Their other big export item was wool, of which Iberia itself had plenty, so I am not sure what the English would trade. Possibly they fished, but also bought
    some wine (hence the coins) and the wine was smuggled in.
    Sure sounds like they might have landed on soil and had a trade house!

    What do you think William?
    It sounds plausible. Avoiding customs duties and various regulations was standard practice. In one case Irish customs duties went from 6000 pounds
    to near zero in a couple of decades, though the trade was still doing well. This was circa 1400, when six thousand pounds was a significant sum.

    William Hyde

    Indeed - over £4 million!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From a425couple@21:1/5 to Surreyman on Mon Nov 28 10:42:57 2022
    On 11/28/22 01:10, Surreyman wrote:
    On Sunday, November 27, 2022 at 11:48:37 PM UTC, William Hyde wrote:
    On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 1:15:12 PM UTC-5, a425couple wrote:
    On 11/19/22 14:18, William Hyde wrote:
    On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 11:58:48 AM UTC-5, a425couple
    wrote:
    from

    https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-history-archaeology/medieval-coin-canada-0017528

    Medieval Coin in Canada Challenges Story of North American Discovery

    I thought it was generally accepted that European fishermen were
    working on the
    grand banks long before 1492 and that this would inevitably result in
    some
    landings on Newfoundland.

    Yes, most of us readers would think this fishing would have resulted
    in landings much before 1492. But,, yet,,, they never claim to have.
    As I understand it the idea is that they wanted to keep the fishing
    grounds as
    little known as possible. -----

    On September 7 2022, I posted on this newsgroup, about this interesting
    book I'd read:
    Terra Incognita: The True Story of How America Got Its Name
    by Rodney Broome
    from
    https://www.amazon.com/Terra-Incognita-True-Story-America/dp/0944638228

    ---------------
    So, the prior written records / (fictions!) was that a merchant would
    send his ship from Bristol England, loaded with spoiled wine (vinigar)
    and salt to sea, where they met up with a fishing fleet, and traded
    their cargo for dried / keged / salted / compressed fish, and did
    the trade, and returned.

    I would think the other way around would be more plausible. The English
    exported fish, and imported wine (and possibly vinegar). Their other
    big

    Yes,,, the manifests I was recalling showed the Bristol ships had gotten
    cargos of 'spoiled wine' from Portugal, then stopped back at Bristol,
    then on to the fishing areas.

    The book has quite a few specifics of what goods were hauled and
    traded to

    export item was wool, of which Iberia itself had plenty, so I am not
    sure
    what the English would trade. Possibly they fished, but also bought
    some wine (hence the coins) and the wine was smuggled in.
    Sure sounds like they might have landed on soil and had a trade house!

    What do you think William?
    It sounds plausible. Avoiding customs duties and various regulations was
    standard practice. In one case Irish customs duties went from 6000
    pounds
    to near zero in a couple of decades, though the trade was still
    doing well.
    This was circa 1400, when six thousand pounds was a significant sum.
    William Hyde

    Indeed - over £4 million!

    It is good to hear from you Surreyman.
    Do you ever visit Bristol?
    The above book has a number of interesting comments about
    trading ships and Bristol 1450-1550. Sail up the estuary,
    wait for row boats to pull them with the tide, up river
    to tie up to the dock in Bristol, then settle on the river
    bottom as the tide goes out.

    Interesting to me anyway.
    Also interesting is that my current satellite pictures
    on Google maps of Bristol, show the River Avon at this
    described low tide. And show the need of the later
    built Cumberland Basin, protected by locks.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Surreyman@21:1/5 to All on Tue Nov 29 00:45:33 2022
    On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 6:42:59 PM UTC, a425couple wrote:
    On 11/28/22 01:10, Surreyman wrote:
    On Sunday, November 27, 2022 at 11:48:37 PM UTC, William Hyde wrote:
    On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 1:15:12 PM UTC-5, a425couple wrote:
    On 11/19/22 14:18, William Hyde wrote:
    On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 11:58:48 AM UTC-5, a425couple
    wrote:
    from

    https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-history-archaeology/medieval-coin-canada-0017528

    Medieval Coin in Canada Challenges Story of North American Discovery >>>>
    I thought it was generally accepted that European fishermen were
    working on the
    grand banks long before 1492 and that this would inevitably result in >>> some
    landings on Newfoundland.

    Yes, most of us readers would think this fishing would have resulted
    in landings much before 1492. But,, yet,,, they never claim to have.
    As I understand it the idea is that they wanted to keep the fishing grounds as
    little known as possible. -----

    On September 7 2022, I posted on this newsgroup, about this interesting >>> book I'd read:
    Terra Incognita: The True Story of How America Got Its Name
    by Rodney Broome
    from
    https://www.amazon.com/Terra-Incognita-True-Story-America/dp/0944638228 >>>
    ---------------
    So, the prior written records / (fictions!) was that a merchant would >>> send his ship from Bristol England, loaded with spoiled wine (vinigar) >>> and salt to sea, where they met up with a fishing fleet, and traded
    their cargo for dried / keged / salted / compressed fish, and did
    the trade, and returned.

    I would think the other way around would be more plausible. The English >> exported fish, and imported wine (and possibly vinegar). Their other
    big
    Yes,,, the manifests I was recalling showed the Bristol ships had gotten cargos of 'spoiled wine' from Portugal, then stopped back at Bristol,
    then on to the fishing areas.

    The book has quite a few specifics of what goods were hauled and
    traded to
    export item was wool, of which Iberia itself had plenty, so I am not
    sure
    what the English would trade. Possibly they fished, but also bought
    some wine (hence the coins) and the wine was smuggled in.
    Sure sounds like they might have landed on soil and had a trade house! >>>
    What do you think William?
    It sounds plausible. Avoiding customs duties and various regulations was >> standard practice. In one case Irish customs duties went from 6000
    pounds
    to near zero in a couple of decades, though the trade was still
    doing well.
    This was circa 1400, when six thousand pounds was a significant sum.
    William Hyde

    Indeed - over £4 million!
    It is good to hear from you Surreyman.
    Do you ever visit Bristol?
    The above book has a number of interesting comments about
    trading ships and Bristol 1450-1550. Sail up the estuary,
    wait for row boats to pull them with the tide, up river
    to tie up to the dock in Bristol, then settle on the river
    bottom as the tide goes out.

    Interesting to me anyway.
    Also interesting is that my current satellite pictures
    on Google maps of Bristol, show the River Avon at this
    described low tide. And show the need of the later
    built Cumberland Basin, protected by locks.

    The nearest I usually get is when crossing the Severn Bridge when commuting between Surrey and Caerphilly.
    But all the mud flats across the massive Severn at low tide are indicative enough of the problems Bristol must have!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)