Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:

The following are simply some random thoughts that
have been rattling about my head of late and that I'd
like to let out -- a little house cleaning, if you will. One
of the first facts we should face is that Darlene is an
opportunist. That is, it is an ideological chameleon,
without any real morality, without a soul and without
a soul mate.

She's also a troll who trolls by acting like she's a victim
when the truth is she's her own worst enemy. Darlene
embraces chaos with open arms. And if that seems like
a modest claim, I disagree. It's the most radical claim
of all.

I use such language purposefully -- and somewhat
sardonically -- to illustrate how Darlene keeps trying to
legitimize her fear of intimate relationships. And if we
don't try to help her over her insecurities, it will really
succeed. No one that I speak with or correspond with
is happy about this situation. Of course, I don't speak
or correspond with quasi-devious, jaded people,
Darlene's many sock puppets or anyone else who fails
to realize that Darlene's trolling addictions are not an
abstract problem. They have very concrete, immediate,
and unpleasant consequences.

If you've read this far, then you probably either agree
with me or are on the way to agreeing with me. Call
me a cynic, but it is singularly apt that I haven't the
foggiest idea why Darlene wants to troll for attention on
the one hand and then demand nobody talk to or about
her on the other hand.

Darlene does, occasionally, make a valid point. But
when she says that it is not only acceptable, but indeed
desirable, to commit confrontational, in-your-face acts
of insolence, intimidation, and incivility as trolling that's
where the facts end and the ludicrousness begins.
Darlene loves getting up in front of people and telling
them that she is the ultimate authority on what's right
and what's wrong on Usenet - while she uses Google
Groups - the very worst way to access Usenet and the
reason she was outed by some of those who took
offence when she falsely accused them of this that
and the other.

Darlene then boasts about how she'll impose ideology,
control thought, and punish virtually any behavior she
disapproves of. It's all part of the media spectacle that
is Darlene. Of course, Darlene soaks it up and wallows
in it like a pig in mud.

Speaking of pigs and mud, Darlene has some subscribers
who have pushed back against her wild fantasies and
virtual slander of them. She just hates it that not everybody
adores her. And she punishes some who DO adore her
by insulting them and bullying them and attempting to
intimidate them like she just did with her silly demand
that everybody stop talking about her.

Here's a clue, Darlene. You can't demand people give
up their free speech rights. Get it?

How do you like me, now?

yay

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)