XPost: alt.atheism
Oko Tillo wrote:
On Wednesday, March 22, 2023 at 6:13:16 AM UTC-7, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Skeeter <nom...@invalid.invalid> wrote in
news:MPG.3e84184f3...@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <XnsAFCED5D424215...@69.80.101.53>,
noe...@verizon.net says...
Skeeter <nom...@invalid.invalid> wrote in
news:MPG.3e83ba82185d5cf998bd34 @usnews.blocknews.net:
In article
<67b6a8e6-fcc2-47d8...@googlegroups.com>,
f.spl...@gmail.com says...
On Tuesday, March 21, 2023 at 1:08:03 AM UTC-7, Andrew wrote:
"JWS" wrote in message news:3aa5783a-ae7b-4a94...
@googlegroups.com...
Andrew wrote:
"Mitchell Holman" wrote:
"Andrew" wrote:
What is called "The Fossil Record" is actually evidence
of the worldwide deluge that overwhelmed the ancient
antediluvians.
You see, when animals die, they don't turn into fossils. >>>>>>>>>>> No, rather they decompose and the elements of which
they were composed - return to the earth.
Therefore the fossils that we find all over the place are >>>>>>>>>>> the remains of plants and animals that were caught in
the sedimentary material that resulted from, the Event.
Why are all fossils extinct species?
No humans, no modern horses, no modern
dogs, no modern apes.
Genetic information obviously descended
from the animals that survived on the Ark
resulting in what we see today.
That's a good enough admission that
evolution is true and responsible for
what we see today.
OK, but the *prime origin* of the genetic
information that is refereed to, could not
have been from an evolutionary scenario.
//
And, BTW, why don't you try answering
directly some of the questions asked
so far?
Why? Did you think I'm the source of
all knowledge? I'm not.Then you need
to look things up yourself.
Right on!
Donchya see, JWS, that it's up to us to prove
Andrew's claims for him. Why in the world
would you think that it's his job to back up
anything he says every time people more honest
than he is question them?
Sheesh. It's hard enough trying to defend a collection
of the folk tales of an ancient pastoral tribe as
being actual science without having to answer
every penetrating question that comes along.
Sri
Just dinosaurs and
trilobites and megalons.
Did humans and horses and chimps not
live at the time of Ye Floode?
//
But you still can't prove "evolution".
Sure we can.
You just refuse to believe it.
Evolution observed
http://listverse.com/2011/11/19/8-examples-of-evolution-in-action/
http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2014/02/evolution-in-real-time/
http://discovermagazine.com/2015/march/19-life-in-the-fast-lane
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-42103058
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2019/01/unprecedentedly-
thorough-evolution-experiment/581521/
https://futurism.com/the-byte/scientists-watched-bacteria-evolve-real- >>>> time
https://phys.org/news/2021-07-evolution-real.html
None are actual "proof"
That is just what I said.
You refuse to even look at the
proof you are wrong.
Mitchell, it's exactly like trying to argue with a Flat Earther.
You could cite all the geographical and astronomical evidence you wanted;
it wouldn't have the slightest effect.
Sri
its usually the lesser intelligent person , that comments
on the more intelligent person's , lack of intelligents
and we all think what we do has major significants
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)