• California woman, 18, sues doctors for removing her breasts when she wa

    From D. Ray@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 21 03:07:18 2023
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc, alt.transgendered
    XPost: alt.censorship

    A California woman is suing the hospital that removed her breasts when she
    was 13, claiming her doctors pushed her into the procedure under the
    'erroneous belief' she was transgender.

    Kayla Lovdahl, now 18, says she underwent the invasive surgery after being urged to 'entertain' the plans by medical professionals when she was just 11-years-old.

    According to a lawsuit filed by Lovdahl against Kaiser Foundation Hospitals
    and four doctors, it is claimed they 'handed Kayla the prescription pad,
    and allowed her naĂŻve, emotional, childish, rollercoaster of feelings to dictate the so-called 'treatment' that she would receive.'

    The legal challenge comes amid a growing chorus of 'de-transitioning'
    youths, many of whom claim they were subjected to death threats and intimidation after turning their backs on the 'cult-like' transgender community.

    After years of battling mental health issues, Lovdahl claims she was
    'exposed to online transgender influencers' who prompted her to
    'erroneously' believe she was transgender when she was 11.

    With her parents unsure how best to support her, the tween sought medical
    help, rapidly sending her down a path of risky treatments.

    By the age of 12, she was on puberty blockers and testosterone despite
    never receiving a proper psychological evaluation, per the lawsuit.

    Amid concerns over the potential surgeries, it is alleged that Lovdahl's physicians told her parents: 'It is better to have a live son than a dead daughter'.

    Her entire transition evaluation lasted just 75-minutes, she claims, as
    Lovdahl alleges the process that led her to surgery is 'ideological and profit-driven medical abuse'.

    Within six months, Lovdahl underwent a double mastectomy, a decision she
    now regrets after detransitioning a year ago.

    Her lawsuit condemned the system that allowed her to undergo the invasive surgery at such a young age, saying: 'There is no other area of medicine
    where doctors will surgically remove a perfectly healthy body part and intentionally induce a diseased state of the pituitary gland misfunction
    based simply on the young adolescent patient's wishes.'

    After detransitioning, she says she began regular psychotherapy sessions to help her mental health, 'which is the care she should have been receiving
    all along', the lawsuit states.

    'The vast majority of cross-gender identified children, if medically
    treated in early adolescence, risk regretting the decision after they are
    old enough to realize their losses,' Lovdahl added.

    She said the ordeal left her with 'deep physical and emotional wounds and severe regrets'.

    She also claims the hospital and doctors did not provide her and her
    parents proper 'informed consent', which would have introduced therapy sessions, something she says was never offered.

    In a statement, her lawyers criticized the procedures as 'an insane form of child abuse'.

    'We believe cases like this are the best way to stop them, especially in liberal states like California, where reckless ideologues are pushing this radical agenda,' said attorney Charles Limandri.

    Kaiser Foundation Hospitals has been contacted by DailyMail.com for
    comment.

    <https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12206847/Woman-pressured-breast-removal-13-erroneous-belief-transgender-lawsuit.html>

    <https://archive.ph/8v3Xj>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Keefe Chambers@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 21 03:48:06 2023
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc, alt.transgendered
    XPost: alt.censorship

    We should be shooting more Republican Christian rapists. Torture the
    white supremacists before killing them.

    So, Let’s Talk About Republicans and Sex Crimes
    This seems like an appropriate moment.

    From left to right: Former House Speaker Dennis Hastert (who admitted to
    sex crimes), Rep. Jim Jordan (who was accused or turning a blind eye to
    sex crimes), former Republican Senate candidate Roy Moore (who was accused
    of … well, you know), and Rep. Matt Gaetz (who is being investigated for possible sex crimes).

    Because American politics are now just one, long, low-rent nightmare, Republican culture warriors have spent the past few weeks slandering their various enemies as being soft on pedophilia. For some time, this sort of
    raving was mostly confined to adherents of QAnon, the Trump-idolizing conspiracy cult that believes Democratic politicians and other elites are secretly operating a global child trafficking ring.

    But a confluence of events has helped bring a version of it mainstream.

    During the Supreme Court confirmation hearings of judge Ketanji Brown
    Jackson in March, Republican Senators Josh Hawley and Ted Cruz attempted
    to smear the nominee by inaccurately claiming that she had a record of
    handing out unusually light sentences in cases where defendants were
    accused of viewing child pornography. The issue descended deeper into
    absurdity after three moderate Republicans voted to confirm Jackson this
    week and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene—the walking id of MAGA-
    America—tweeted about them, saying “Murkowski, Collins, and Romney are pro-pedophile.”
    Advertisement

    Meanwhile, defenders of Florida’s new “don’t say gay” law, which strictly limits public school teachers’ ability to discuss LGBTQ people and issues
    in the classroom, began referring to the legislation as an “anti-grooming” bill—evoking the deeply homophobic idea that an adult would only talk
    about these topics with a child in order to prime them for abuse. After
    Disney, one of Florida’s largest employers, called for the law to be
    repealed, conservative social media influencers and Fox News personalities
    like Laura Ingraham launched a wild crusade against the company accusing
    it too of being complicit in “grooming.”

    This is all galling. But it’s especially rich considering that, of the two major parties, the GOP has many more notable and recent scandals involving
    the sexual abuse of minors and young students—as well as a recent track
    record of reacting to them with a shrug.

    Let’s review some of that history …

    In 2006, Florida Rep. Mark Foley was forced to resign after it was
    revealed that he’d sent sexually explicit messages and propositioned
    teenage congressional pages via email and text.

    In 2015, former Rep. Dennis Hastert, the longest-ever serving Republican speaker of the House, pleaded guilty to making illegal hush-money payments
    in order to cover up his history of sexually abusing high school wrestlers
    he had coached decades before.

    “Nothing is more stunning than having ‘serial child molester’ and ‘speaker
    of the House’ in the same sentence,” the judge said at his sentencing.

    During and after the 2016 presidential race, among the dozens of women who accused former president Donald Trump of being a sexual predator were
    several contestants in the 1997 Miss Teen USA pageant, who reported that
    he barged into their dressing room while girls as young as 15 were
    changing. (Trump allegedly told them, “Don’t worry, ladies, I’ve seen it
    all before.”)
    Advertisement

    His campaign denied the accusation, but CNN unearthed a 2005 Howard Stern interview where Trump bragged about walking into backstage dressing rooms
    at the pageants he ran.

    During the 2018 midterms, Alabama Senate candidate Roy Moore was accused
    of preying on girls as young as 14 and 16; the New Yorker reported that
    his habit of trying to pick up high schoolers was so notorious that it
    actually got him banned from a local mall.

    Also in 2018, Rep. Jim Jordan, one of Trump’s fiercest allies and a co-
    founder of the hardline conservative Freedom Caucus, became embroiled in a scandal over his time as a wrestling coach at Ohio State University, where
    a team doctor named Richard Strauss, who committed suicide in 2005, was
    found to have sexually abused more than 177 male student athletes.

    An investigation commissioned by the university found that Strauss
    regularly used examinations as an excuse to grope and fondle the students, sometimes to the point of ejaculation; often ordered them to strip nude unnecessarily; and in two cases, attempted to perform oral sex. Numerous
    former wrestlers told reporters that Jordan was personally aware of the
    abuse during the early 1990s but chose to turn a blind eye. The
    Congressman simply denied having any knowledge of it—and suggested at
    least one of the accusers claiming otherwise was acting on a personal
    vendetta against him.

    And finally, Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida is currently the subject of a
    literal sex-trafficking investigation, which is looking into whether he
    had sex with an underage 17-year-old girl, among other issues. (Greene is
    close with Gaetz, who denies the allegations, and has defended him.)

    On Twitter, liberals have taken to rattling off this list of
    scandals—among others—in response to conservative accusations of grooming
    (in a somewhat apt turn of events, a former Republican National Committee staffer was sentenced for a child pornography conviction the same day
    Jackson was confirmed to the court).
    Advertisement

    Some have gone further, remarking that the GOP is particularly afflicted
    with a pedophilia problem. “Every accusation is a confession,” goes one
    popular refrain. (Some large social media accounts have been trying to
    make the phrase “pedocon” stick.)

    Personally, I don’t think Democrats ought to start earnestly debating with Republicans over which party really has more pedophiles overall (which is
    a sentence I can’t really believe I’m typing, but here we are). Sexual
    abuse and misconduct doesn’t have a partisan valence. You can certainly
    find some Democrats out in the world who’ve been convicted on child porn charges. And never forget that Anthony Weiner went to jail for sexting a 15-year-old.

    But if conservatives are going to smear progressives as “groomers” and
    pose as the nation’s protectors of children, it’s certainly fair to bring
    up this history in retort. It’s also entirely valid to note how weak the
    GOP’s response has been to recent scandals concerning its own rank-and-
    file.

    The way Republicans set aside the vast array of sexual abuse charges
    against Trump and lined up behind him has been discussed so many times
    that there’s no real need to go over it again. The party’s response to
    Moore, meanwhile, was what you might describe as, well, semi-pathetic. To
    their credit, a number of elected Republicans called on Moore to exit the
    race or said they would vote for a write-in candidate, and the National Republican Senatorial Committee pulled its funding from his campaign.

    The Republican National Committee did as well, at least briefly.

    But after Donald Trump decided to reendorse Moore, the RNC resumed its
    support of his candidacy, stating, “We stand with the president.”

    When it came to Jordan, congressional Republicans simply circled the
    wagons. In 2018, then House Speaker Paul Ryan waved off demands for an
    ethics committee inquiry into whether Jordan was lying about his conduct
    as a wrestling coach, saying that the panel “??investigates things that
    members do while they’re here, not things that happened a couple of
    decades ago when they weren’t in Congress.”
    Advertisement

    He then called Jordan “a man of honesty and a man of integrity.”

    Later, in 2020, Jordan’s GOP colleagues selected him to become the top
    ranking Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, which handles federal criminal legislation—including on issues such as sex trafficking and child pornography. Liz Cheney, then the No. 3 Republican in the House, said it
    was a “totally unified decision all around.”

    This all unfolded in the face of credible allegations that Jordan not only
    knew about the abuse at Ohio State, but had responded to multiple students
    who told him about it with comments like “If he tried that on me, I would
    kill him.” By all accounts, Strauss’ behavior was an open secret. Six
    former wrestlers told CNN that they were personally present when Jordan
    heard misconduct complaints about the doctor. A former ref also filed a
    lawsuit alleging that he complained to Jordan and another coach after
    Strauss masturbated in front of him, and they merely responded, “Yeah,
    that’s Strauss.”

    Jordan claims that he was cleared of any wrongdoing in the official report
    by Ohio State’s investigators, which did not mention his name. “The investigators concluded what we have said from the beginning: Congressman Jordan never knew of any abuse, and if he had he would have dealt with
    it.”

    But that’s not what the report actually said. Rather, the investigators
    wrote that, except in the case of one coach, they could not “identify any
    other contemporaneous documentary evidence” proving that athletic staff
    were aware of Strauss’s actions. In other words, there was no paper trail. However, they added that “22 coaches confirmed to the Investigative Team
    that they were aware of rumors and/or complaints about Strauss, dating
    back to the late 1970s and extending into the mid-1990s.”
    Advertisement

    It is theoretically possible that Jordan really had his head so deeply
    buried in the sand during his coaching days that he knew nothing about
    what was happening on his team, and that the more than half-dozen
    witnesses who claim otherwise are simply lying or misremembering. (Several other former Ohio State coaches issued a statement saying they were
    unaware of Strauss’s misconduct).

    A much simpler explanation, however, would be that Jordan himself lied to
    cover his complicity in a culture of tolerance around sexual abuse. Either
    way, Republicans chose to make him one of their most powerful members in Congress in spite of this unresolved cloud.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D. Ray@21:1/5 to Keefe Chambers on Wed Jun 21 18:27:39 2023
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc, alt.transgendered
    XPost: alt.censorship

    Keefe Chambers <nowomr@protonmail.com> wrote:

    Groomer is triggered, lol.

    We should be shooting more Republican Christian rapists. Torture the
    white supremacists before killing them.

    So, Let’s Talk About Republicans and Sex Crimes
    This seems like an appropriate moment.

    No, no it’s not. It’s an appropriate moment to talk about consequences of insane child abuse that’s happening across the nation to please minuscule number of sex perverts and doctors profiteering on mentally unstable
    children.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NoBody@21:1/5 to D. Ray on Thu Jun 22 07:20:23 2023
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc, alt.transgendered
    XPost: alt.censorship

    On Wed, 21 Jun 23 03:07:18 UTC, D. Ray <d@ray> wrote:

    A California woman is suing the hospital that removed her breasts when she >was 13, claiming her doctors pushed her into the procedure under the >'erroneous belief' she was transgender.

    Kayla Lovdahl, now 18, says she underwent the invasive surgery after being >urged to 'entertain' the plans by medical professionals when she was just >11-years-old.

    According to a lawsuit filed by Lovdahl against Kaiser Foundation Hospitals >and four doctors, it is claimed they 'handed Kayla the prescription pad,
    and allowed her naďve, emotional, childish, rollercoaster of feelings to >dictate the so-called 'treatment' that she would receive.'

    The legal challenge comes amid a growing chorus of 'de-transitioning'
    youths, many of whom claim they were subjected to death threats and >intimidation after turning their backs on the 'cult-like' transgender >community.


    There will be many more such cases in the future. Doctors, as a
    result, will decline doing these procedures for fear of being sued.
    The trans activists will start screaming that doctors should be forced
    to perform these procedures.

    Just another day of leftie "logic" reaching its proper conclusion.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)