• Re: Drilling vs returns. U.S. oil producers' tradeoff as windfall tax t

    From Dumpster Democrats@21:1/5 to lefty asswipes on Sun Jul 10 09:43:58 2022
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.abortion, talk.politics.misc
    XPost: talk.politics.guns

    In article <t17ar6$2ro33$97@news.freedyn.de>
    lefty asswipes <lefty-asswipes@disney.com> wrote:

    ...I spent all night taking it up the ass.

    (Reuters) - U.S. oil producers profiting from sky-high prices
    are doling out billions to shareholders and building cash
    reserves, a strategy irking lawmakers and voters struggling with
    record fuel prices while winning over Wall Street.

    Soaring fuel prices have boosted inflation to a 40-year record
    and are expected to drive up U.S. gasoline by more than a dollar
    to $6 a gallon by August. That prospect has some officials
    arguing the industry's focus on returns is benefiting a few at
    the expense of consumers.

    The tradeoff between rising payouts for just a single quarter
    and more spending on production has deprived the market of
    nearly half a million barrels of new oil daily, based on
    Reuters' estimates of potential output if half of existing
    investor payouts flowed to new oil and gas drilling.

    Earnings from major U.S. shale, which accounts for two-thirds of
    U.S. oil output, could hit $90 billion this year, up from $37
    billion in 2021, according to consultancy BTU Analytics, a
    FactSet Company. Its estimate covers only 32 publicly traded oil
    and gas producers.

    Executives are facing calls in Washington for windfall levies,
    which could cut into energy profits. A group of more than 30
    lawmakers recently urged a Congressional vote on a new oil tax.

    U.S. President Joe Biden on Friday slammed oil companies, saying
    they are intentionally holding off drilling more to pump up oil
    and share prices. [nL1N2XX1VP]

    "They're buying back their own stock, which should be taxed,
    quite frankly," Biden said.

    Executives and investors have argued that fuel prices are set by
    the market and retailers, not producers. Materials and labor
    shortages have limited how fast they can ramp up output, and to
    spend a lot more on new drilling would erode capital efficiency
    and lead investors to exit.

    Though analysts and oil executives do not expect a windfall tax
    to pass here, Britain recently imposed a 25% oil profit tax to
    offset consumer energy bills, giving hope to some U.S. lawmakers
    proposing the tax. And resistance to the tax may shrink as fuel
    prices soar and corporate earnings follow.

    "If the conservative government in the U.K. can support a
    windfall tax, we should be able to pass" a U.S. equivalent, said
    Representative Ro Khanna, Democrat of California, and a co-
    sponsor of the tax proposal.

    The goal is to raise $45 billion a year with proceeds funding
    payments to consumers.

    But a windfall tax would kill the incentive to drill more, said
    oil executives, and take away some of the earnings that fund new
    technology advances that led to the U.S. shale revolution which
    turned the United States into the world's top producer. It would
    also lessen oil firms' ability to raise outside financing.

    "This is a terrible idea," said Mike Oestmann, chief executive
    of shale producer Tall City Exploration. "If you want less of
    something, or some behavior, or some industry, tax it more
    heavily."

    PUMPING UP OUTPUT, NOT PRICES

    Motivating windfall tax advocates is the idea that U.S. energy
    companies are holding off production to maintain high prices and
    earnings. Companies returned some $9.51 billion to investors in
    the first quarter, according to energy consultancy Wood
    Mackenzie.

    If oil producers had spent half of the $9.51 billion on new
    drilling, it would fund some 660 new shale wells, according to
    Reuters analysis using energy tech firm Enverus' average costs
    of $7.14 million per shale well last year.

    Output varies per basin but on average, a new well can deliver
    some 672 bpd of oil, according to BTU Analytics. Based on the
    additional wells and the average new shale-oil output,
    production could be boosted some 450,000 bpd.

    Those extra barrels could lift U.S. production this year beyond
    the pre-pandemic record of 12.23 million bpd in 2019. The
    government projects output to rise 720,000 bpd to 11.92 million
    bpd in 2022.

    MAKING ENERGY STOCKS ATTRACTIVE AGAIN

    Between 2006 and 2019, the top 50 U.S. oil producers spent $170
    billion more in capital expenditures (capex) than they collected
    from operations, using debt and equity to cover the deficit,
    estimates independent oil analyst Paul Sankey.

    "Effectively, there were no returns" for shareholders, he said.

    Investors last decade shunned energy companies for their lack of
    returns and knocked their weighting in the S&P 500, a measure of
    shareholder interest, to less than 3% in 2020, from more than
    16% in 2008. S&P energy stocks today are 5.1% with burgeoning
    earnings on high oil and gas prices.

    The change in sentiment came as producers shifted to a strategy
    of investing just a third of their cash flow into drilling and
    other capital expenses, compared with most of their cash flow
    two years ago, according to the latest data from Enverus.

    Focusing on shareholder returns over new production is not going
    away with the rise in energy prices. U.S. crude prices are up
    about 60% so far this year.

    "Not one large public (shale producer) increased capex in Q1 for
    increased activity," said Kaes Van't Hof, finance chief at shale
    firm Diamondback Energy Inc, in a recent twitter post.

    That willingness to hold the line on production and reward
    investors via dividends and buybacks "is changing the investment
    aura,” making energy stocks attractive again, said Matthew
    Stephani, president of Cavanal Hill Investment Management, part
    of BOK Financial Corp.

    The S&P 500 oil and gas sector is up more than 60% year-to-date,
    outperforming the broad-market index average, which is down for
    the year.

    Will investors accept a return to higher spending and lower
    shareholder returns? They will not, say portfolio managers and
    investors.

    "As an investor, I think this is a good balance. The companies
    have shown they can’t be trusted," said Chris Duncan, who tracks
    shale firms for asset manager Brandes Investment Partners.

    (Reporting by Liz Hampton in Denver; Editing by Marguerita Choy)

    https://news.yahoo.com/drilling-vs-returns-u-oil-051535642.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)