• Supreme Court turns back Utah's push to wrest control of public land fr

    From Leroy N. Soetoro@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jan 18 23:00:19 2025
    XPost: law.court.federal, utah.general, alt.forestry
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, sac.politics

    https://ktla.com/news/politics/ap-politics/ap-supreme-court-turns-back- utahs-push-to-wrest-control-of-public-land-from-the-federal-government/

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Monday turned back a push by the
    state of Utah to wrest control of vast areas of public land from the
    federal government, marking a small victory for land conservation
    advocates who worry that similar efforts may escalate in a Republican- controlled Washington.

    The high court refused to let the GOP-controlled state file a lawsuit
    seeking to bring the land and its resources under state control. The
    decision came in a brief order in which the court did not explain its reasoning, as is typical. It marks the latest roadblock for states in a
    running feud with the U.S. government over who should control huge swaths
    of the West and the enormous oil and gas, timber, and other resources they contain.

    In the Western state known for its rugged mountains popular with skiers
    and red-rock vistas that draw throngs of tourists, federal agencies
    control almost 70% of the land. Utah argues that local control would be
    more responsive and allow the state access to revenue from taxes and development projects.

    The complaint sought control of about half of federal land, which still
    amounts to an area nearly as large as South Carolina. The parcels are used
    for things like energy production, grazing, mining and recreation. Utah’s world-famous national parks and national monuments would have stayed in
    federal hands.

    Monday’s decision by the high court comes as the newly Republican-
    controlled Congress adopted a rules package that includes language
    allowing lawmakers to more easily transfer or sell off public lands
    managed by federal agencies. The rules consider public lands to have no monetary value, meaning lawmakers will no longer need to account for lost revenue if they decide to give parcels to states or extractive industries.

    While conservationists applauded the court’s rejection of what they called
    a land-grab lawsuit, many remained worried that the efforts will continue.

    Public lands under state control could be vulnerable to privatization, degradation and oil drilling, said Steve Bloch, legal director for the
    Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance.

    “If successful, Utah’s lawsuit would result in the sale of millions of
    acres of public lands in red-rock country to the highest bidder, an end to America’s system of federal public lands and the dismantling of the
    American West as we know it,” Bloch said.

    In a joint statement with Utah’s Republican legislative leaders and
    attorney general, Gov. Spencer Cox said he was disappointed in the court’s decision to turn away the lawsuit.

    “Utah remains able and willing to challenge any BLM land management
    decisions that harm Utah,” state leaders said. “We are also heartened to
    know the incoming administration shares our commitments to the principle
    of ‘multiple use’ for these federal lands and is committed to working with
    us to improve land management. We will continue to fight to keep public
    lands in public hands because it is our stewardship, heritage and home.”

    While lawsuits typically start in federal district courts and eventually
    work their way up to the U.S. Supreme Court, disputes involving states can start at the nation’s highest court if the justices agree to hear them.

    Utah leaders noted that the high court did not comment on the merits of
    their arguments or prevent them from filing the lawsuit in a federal
    district court. Conservation groups say they’ll remain ready to challenge
    any future lawsuits.

    “This lawsuit is an assault on the country’s long-standing and successful history of safeguarding valuable and vulnerable landscapes in trust for
    all Americans,” said Chris Hill, who leads the Conservation Lands
    Foundation. “And while the Supreme Court’s decision to not hear the case
    is a reprieve, we fully expect this small group of anti-public lands politicians to continue to waste taxpayer dollars and shop their bad
    ideas.”

    The federal Bureau of Land Management declined to comment.


    --
    November 5, 2024 - Congratulations President Donald Trump. We look
    forward to America being great again.

    The disease known as Kamala Harris has been effectively treated and
    eradicated.

    We live in a time where intelligent people are being silenced so that
    stupid people won't be offended.

    Durham Report: The FBI has an integrity problem. It has none.

    Thank you for cleaning up the disaster of the 2008-2017 Obama / Biden
    fiasco, President Trump.

    Under Barack Obama's leadership, the United States of America became the
    The World According To Garp. Obama sold out heterosexuals for Hollywood
    queer liberal democrat donors.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)