On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 14:43:45 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in talk.origins, posted by erik simpson
<eastsi...@gmail.com>:
On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 1:35:06?PM UTC-7, jillery wrote:
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 08:40:58 -0700 (PDT), "peter2...@gmail.com"
<peter2...@gmail.com> continues to post his irrelevant and
repetitive comments aka spam:
On the off chance that you are reading this, Bob, I'd like to call your attention
to this little bit in my reply to jillery on this thread this morning. >> >
____________________________ repost begins ________________
All of which are consistent with my expressed meaning, of comments
which are repetitive and irrelevant.
Perhaps we should put it to a vote of the people here as to whether they >> >go along with your opinion of Casanova's usage of "Killfiles are your friend' as being "spam."
Some might even agree with Casanova so vigorously that they might post, >> >"I am Casanova" in analogy with "I am Spartacus" and more recently, "I am Charlie Hebdo."
============================ repost ends=====================
The above is a good example of PeeWee Peter's shit-stirring. As for
putting anything to a vote, I have zero expectation that anyone would
agree with me even if I said water was wet, and I have every
expectation at least one person would claim offense over it.
Lately you.ve been taking offence at both silence and response. What are you
expecting? Nyikos does what he does, much of which is easily ignorable. For the record,
water was wet the last I looked.
Jillery's characterization of "shit-stirring" was exactly on
target, which is why Peter the Grate has a permanent paid
lease in my killfile.
And FWIW, my definition of spam in the
Usenet venue, as in email, includes neither potted meat (the
actual original) nor suggestions related to stated specific
problems.
And FYI, referencing killfiles in response to a post about
idiots who (IMHO; YMMV) should be ignored is not spam except
in jilleryWorld.
The pay goes to the pipers like jillery who snip things to make what
goes on look worse for the killfiled party than they really are.
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 19:41:26 -0700 (PDT), "peter2...@gmail.com"
<peter2...@gmail.com> continues to spam mindless shit-stirring
crap:
The pay goes to the pipers like jillery who snip things to make what
goes on look worse for the killfiled party than they really are.
The irony, it burns.
On Friday, March 31, 2023 at 5:20:06 AM UTC-4, jillery wrote:
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 19:41:26 -0700 (PDT), "peter2...@gmail.com"... gives a mild example of the pernicious effects killfiles can have.
A much worse one from the standpoint of on-topic debate and discussion
will be shown later today on a new offshoot of "Frozen Planet II".
On Friday, March 31, 2023 at 5:20:06?AM UTC-4, jillery wrote:
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 19:41:26 -0700 (PDT), "peter2...@gmail.com"
... gives a mild example of the pernicious effects killfiles can have.
A much worse one from the standpoint of on-topic debate and discussion
will be shown later today on a new offshoot of "Frozen Planet II".
Unfortunately, most people on "Frozen Planet II" seem to be far less interested in
on-topic debate and discussion than in the bonding that comes from personal comments.
<peter2...@gmail.com> continues to spam mindless shit-stirring
crap:
Far from mindless, and your massive snippage of what I wrote keeps
Bob Casanova from seeing that. And so, the pernicious effects of killfiles >continue to unfold.
The pay goes to the pipers like jillery who snip things to make what
goes on look worse for the killfiled party than they really are.
To this, you respond with mindless repartee:
The irony, it burns.
It should burn you: for years, you have applied the dirty debating trick >I've called The One Shade of Gray Meltdown to all kinds of things.
In the case of snippage, you have melted down snips for the sake
of removing redundancy to the same shade of gray as snips for the
sake of making libels look plausible.
Peter Nyikos
PS As for "shit-stirring," Bob showed everyone, with his agreement with you about it on the original thread,
how the tiff between him and you is only skin deep.
Any time you want yourself and Bob to be doing a "kiss and make up,"
you can seize an opportunity where he is showing solidarity with you
in attacking a common opponent.
His agreement with you, clearly visible in my post
to which you've applied massive snippage here,
seems like such an opportunity, but YMMV.
On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 05:51:04 -0700 (PDT), "peter2...@gmail.com" <peter2nyikos@gmail.com> continues to post his irrelevant and
repetitive comments aka spam:
I challenge PeeWee Peter to identify any comment of his below which
can be reasonably described as "on-topic to Frozen Planet II".
I challenge Hemidactylus to identify any comment of Pee Wee Peter's
below which can be reasonably described as "civil".
Willful blindness and hypocritical virtue signaling remains pandemic
on T.O.
<spam left uncommented for purposes of documentation>
On Friday, March 31, 2023 at 5:20:06?AM UTC-4, jillery wrote:
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 19:41:26 -0700 (PDT), "peter2...@gmail.com"
... gives a mild example of the pernicious effects killfiles can have.
A much worse one from the standpoint of on-topic debate and discussion
will be shown later today on a new offshoot of "Frozen Planet II".
Unfortunately, most people on "Frozen Planet II" seem to be far less interested in
on-topic debate and discussion than in the bonding that comes from personal comments.
<peter2...@gmail.com> continues to spam mindless shit-stirring
crap:
Far from mindless, and your massive snippage of what I wrote keeps
Bob Casanova from seeing that. And so, the pernicious effects of killfiles >> continue to unfold.
The pay goes to the pipers like jillery who snip things to make what
goes on look worse for the killfiled party than they really are.
To this, you respond with mindless repartee:
The irony, it burns.
It should burn you: for years, you have applied the dirty debating trick
I've called The One Shade of Gray Meltdown to all kinds of things.
In the case of snippage, you have melted down snips for the sake
of removing redundancy to the same shade of gray as snips for the
sake of making libels look plausible.
Peter Nyikos
PS As for "shit-stirring," Bob showed everyone, with his agreement with
you about it on the original thread,
how the tiff between him and you is only skin deep.
Any time you want yourself and Bob to be doing a "kiss and make up,"
you can seize an opportunity where he is showing solidarity with you
in attacking a common opponent.
His agreement with you, clearly visible in my post
to which you've applied massive snippage here,
seems like such an opportunity, but YMMV.
jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 05:51:04 -0700 (PDT), "peter2...@gmail.com"I had said “quite civil to me recently on this thread”.
<peter2nyikos@gmail.com> continues to post his irrelevant and
repetitive comments aka spam:
I challenge PeeWee Peter to identify any comment of his below which
can be reasonably described as "on-topic to Frozen Planet II".
I challenge Hemidactylus to identify any comment of Pee Wee Peter's
below which can be reasonably described as "civil".
Peter was quite civil to me recently on this thread. You might
consider following his lead. You are just plain rude and obnoxious. ************************************
I find it commendable that I fail to detect the slightest trace of sarcasm >> in your reply.
Consider willful blindness and/or deafness.*************************************
On Sat, 01 Apr 2023 16:21:29 +0000, *Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote:
jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 05:51:04 -0700 (PDT), "peter2...@gmail.com"I had said “quite civil to me recently on this thread”.
<peter2nyikos@gmail.com> continues to post his irrelevant and
repetitive comments aka spam:
I challenge PeeWee Peter to identify any comment of his below which
can be reasonably described as "on-topic to Frozen Planet II".
I challenge Hemidactylus to identify any comment of Pee Wee Peter's
below which can be reasonably described as "civil".
I don't dispute you wrote what you quoted. However, the entirety of
your comment in that post was:
***********************************
Peter was quite civil to me recently on this thread. You might************************************
consider following his lead. You are just plain rude and obnoxious.
And to eliminate any reasonable excuse for anybody to conveniently
ignore context:
***********************************
From: *Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid>
Newsgroups: talk.origins
Subject: Re: A Metamorphosis of Martin Harran WAS: Re: Frozen Planet
II
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 09:02:36 +0000
Message-ID: <-SudnWpVB7QxY775nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com> ************************************
In the above, you allude to an unspecified post PeeWee Peter wrote.
You claim it as a contrasting example to my post, and suggest I follow
it as a model of civility. Your comments suggests to me two things:
1. You believe the post to which you allude somehow redeems PeeWee
Peter from all of his other posts where he has been very much UNcivil
to you.
2. You believe my post to which you replied somehow condemns me
personally as "plain rude and obnoxious".
Again, to eliminate reasonable excuses, the following is the entirety
of my comment from my reply:
*************************************
YOU:
I find it commendable that I fail to detect the slightest trace of sarcasm >>> in your reply.
ME:
Consider willful blindness and/or deafness.*************************************
I challenge you, Hemidactylus, to identify what it is about my comment
cited above that you find uncivil or rude or obnoxious? Or were you
just doing tit-for-tat?
jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 01 Apr 2023 16:21:29 +0000, *Hemidactylus*Your ultimatum is rude, obnoxious, petty, and silly.
<ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote:
jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 05:51:04 -0700 (PDT), "peter2...@gmail.com"I had said “quite civil to me recently on this thread”.
<peter2nyikos@gmail.com> continues to post his irrelevant and
repetitive comments aka spam:
I challenge PeeWee Peter to identify any comment of his below which
can be reasonably described as "on-topic to Frozen Planet II".
I challenge Hemidactylus to identify any comment of Pee Wee Peter's
below which can be reasonably described as "civil".
I don't dispute you wrote what you quoted. However, the entirety of
your comment in that post was:
***********************************
Peter was quite civil to me recently on this thread. You might************************************
consider following his lead. You are just plain rude and obnoxious.
And to eliminate any reasonable excuse for anybody to conveniently
ignore context:
***********************************
From: *Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid>
Newsgroups: talk.origins
Subject: Re: A Metamorphosis of Martin Harran WAS: Re: Frozen Planet
II
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 09:02:36 +0000
Message-ID: <-SudnWpVB7QxY775nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com>
************************************
In the above, you allude to an unspecified post PeeWee Peter wrote.
You claim it as a contrasting example to my post, and suggest I follow
it as a model of civility. Your comments suggests to me two things:
1. You believe the post to which you allude somehow redeems PeeWee
Peter from all of his other posts where he has been very much UNcivil
to you.
2. You believe my post to which you replied somehow condemns me
personally as "plain rude and obnoxious".
Again, to eliminate reasonable excuses, the following is the entirety
of my comment from my reply:
*************************************
YOU:
I find it commendable that I fail to detect the slightest trace of sarcasm >>>> in your reply.
ME:
Consider willful blindness and/or deafness.*************************************
I challenge you, Hemidactylus, to identify what it is about my comment
cited above that you find uncivil or rude or obnoxious? Or were you
just doing tit-for-tat?
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 497 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 25:56:39 |
| Calls: | 9,796 |
| Calls today: | 15 |
| Files: | 13,749 |
| Messages: | 6,188,254 |