• Plant evolution 600 million years before land plants evolved.

    From RonO@21:1/5 to All on Mon Sep 4 10:07:23 2023
    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/08/230830160828.htm

    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41477-023-01491-0

    Over a billion years ago we had eukaryotes, and some of them formed an endosymbiotic relationship with bacteria that could utilize oxygen for oxidative phosphorylation (our mitochondria), and some of these
    eukaryotes also developed an endosymbiotic relationship with
    photosynthetic bacteria. The photosynthetic eukaryotes evolved into
    what we call plants.

    These researchers looked at how algae respond to stress and determined
    that the genes used evolved within a 600 million year period before land
    plants evolved from algal ancestors. Terrestrial plants use these same
    stress response genes that allowed them to colonize a hostile
    terrestrial environment.

    The Reason to Believe IDiots claim that their intelligent designer is
    the Biblical God, and they also claim that the Bible is factually true.
    Before the ID scam was initiated by the ID perps at the Discovery
    Institute the Reason to Believe IDiots were just plain old earth
    Biblical creationists.

    https://reasons.org/single/creation-model-approach

    Unlike the ID perps the Reason to Believe IDiots claimed to be
    intelligent design advocates, but also claim that they never wanted to
    teach the junk in the public schools. They wanted to construct their
    creation model to support their religious beliefs.

    They failed.

    https://reasons.org/explore/publications/articles/summary-of-reasons-to-believes-testable-creation-model-1

    They had to reinterpret parts of the Bible so that the sun and moon did
    not have to be created on the fourth day (after the creation of land
    plants). Even though they use the fossil record for gap denial like the Cambrian explosion they have to deny that data to maintain the Biblical chronology that they want to preserve. So land plants have to be
    created before the sea creatures even though the Cambrian explosion
    denial tells them that sea creatures existed long before land plants.
    Not only that, but the transitional whale fossils have to be denied
    because they need whales to be among the sea creatures created after
    land plants, but before terrestrial vertebrates were created. There is
    very little doubt that the mammalian ancestors of whales were created
    long before whales were created. Whales are mammals, their mammalian predecessors are terrestrial vertebrates, but the Reason to Believe
    IDiots need sea mammals and birds to be created before their terrestrial vertebrate ancestors were created. They don't deal with mosasaurus and
    other aquatic reptiles because they do not want them to be the
    leviathans mentioned in the Bible.

    The ID scam "science" is just more science to deny. The Reason to
    Believe IDiotic denial of what the Top Six evidences for IDiocy mean to creationism is pretty much why the Top Six killed IDiocy on TO. The
    Reason to Believe IDiots may use the Top Six god-of-the-gaps denial the
    same way as the ID perps at the Discovery Institute, but in trying to
    build their biblical creation model they have to reject the Top Six as
    the best evidence for IDiocy. The intelligent designer of the Top Six
    is not the Biblical designer.

    The sad thing is that they have to deny their own denial because they
    want to deny that biological evolution has been occurring on this planet
    for billions of years. They could easily just use their excuse that a
    lot of things are not mentioned in the Bible as existing when everyone
    knows that they once existed. The sun and moon existed for billions of
    years before being mentioned as being created in the Bible. They could
    use that excuse for all the inconsistent biblical chronology, but they
    do not want to do it because the actual chronology means that biological evolution is likely the means of creation of life on earth, and that
    isn't biblical enough for them. Even though biological evolution is
    just one more thing that is not mentioned in the Bible, they can't be
    honest enough with themselves to accept what the science actually tells
    them. It is obviously the same for most of the creationists that became
    IDiots after the failure of scientific creationism. Not very many of
    them ever wanted to ever accomplish any IDiotic science because that
    would just be more science that had to be denied.

    Ron Okimoto

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?w5bDtiBUaWli?=@21:1/5 to RonO on Mon Sep 4 10:03:08 2023
    On Monday, 4 September 2023 at 18:10:25 UTC+3, RonO wrote:
    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/08/230830160828.htm

    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41477-023-01491-0

    Over a billion years ago we had eukaryotes, and some of them formed an endosymbiotic relationship with bacteria that could utilize oxygen for oxidative phosphorylation (our mitochondria), and some of these
    eukaryotes also developed an endosymbiotic relationship with
    photosynthetic bacteria. The photosynthetic eukaryotes evolved into
    what we call plants.

    These researchers looked at how algae respond to stress and determined
    that the genes used evolved within a 600 million year period before land plants evolved from algal ancestors. Terrestrial plants use these same
    stress response genes that allowed them to colonize a hostile
    terrestrial environment.

    The Reason to Believe IDiots claim that their intelligent designer is
    the Biblical God, and they also claim that the Bible is factually true. Before the ID scam was initiated by the ID perps at the Discovery
    Institute the Reason to Believe IDiots were just plain old earth
    Biblical creationists.

    https://reasons.org/single/creation-model-approach

    Unlike the ID perps the Reason to Believe IDiots claimed to be
    intelligent design advocates, but also claim that they never wanted to
    teach the junk in the public schools. They wanted to construct their
    creation model to support their religious beliefs.

    They failed.

    https://reasons.org/explore/publications/articles/summary-of-reasons-to-believes-testable-creation-model-1

    They had to reinterpret parts of the Bible so that the sun and moon did
    not have to be created on the fourth day (after the creation of land
    plants).

    Note that there are studies that claim that atmosphere was not very thick already 2.7 bya: <https://www.washington.edu/news/2016/05/09/early-earths-air-weighed-less-than-half-of-todays-atmosphere/>
    So it is unclear what there supposedly was that did hide sun, moon and
    stars until after land plants emerged.

    Even though they use the fossil record for gap denial like the
    Cambrian explosion they have to deny that data to maintain the Biblical chronology that they want to preserve. So land plants have to be
    created before the sea creatures even though the Cambrian explosion
    denial tells them that sea creatures existed long before land plants.
    Not only that, but the transitional whale fossils have to be denied
    because they need whales to be among the sea creatures created after
    land plants, but before terrestrial vertebrates were created. There is
    very little doubt that the mammalian ancestors of whales were created
    long before whales were created. Whales are mammals, their mammalian predecessors are terrestrial vertebrates, but the Reason to Believe
    IDiots need sea mammals and birds to be created before their terrestrial vertebrate ancestors were created. They don't deal with mosasaurus and
    other aquatic reptiles because they do not want them to be the
    leviathans mentioned in the Bible.

    The ID scam "science" is just more science to deny. The Reason to
    Believe IDiotic denial of what the Top Six evidences for IDiocy mean to creationism is pretty much why the Top Six killed IDiocy on TO. The
    Reason to Believe IDiots may use the Top Six god-of-the-gaps denial the
    same way as the ID perps at the Discovery Institute, but in trying to
    build their biblical creation model they have to reject the Top Six as
    the best evidence for IDiocy. The intelligent designer of the Top Six
    is not the Biblical designer.

    The sad thing is that they have to deny their own denial because they
    want to deny that biological evolution has been occurring on this planet
    for billions of years. They could easily just use their excuse that a
    lot of things are not mentioned in the Bible as existing when everyone
    knows that they once existed. The sun and moon existed for billions of
    years before being mentioned as being created in the Bible. They could
    use that excuse for all the inconsistent biblical chronology, but they
    do not want to do it because the actual chronology means that biological evolution is likely the means of creation of life on earth, and that
    isn't biblical enough for them. Even though biological evolution is
    just one more thing that is not mentioned in the Bible, they can't be
    honest enough with themselves to accept what the science actually tells
    them. It is obviously the same for most of the creationists that became IDiots after the failure of scientific creationism. Not very many of
    them ever wanted to ever accomplish any IDiotic science because that
    would just be more science that had to be denied.

    They can't also be honest with themselves what Bible tells to them.
    It is actually quite good book about issues with us. The whole message
    of it felt (to me) that we are evil and adulterous, our temples are business centres, our authorities are corrupt and our judicial system is farce.
    Why to search deep scientific wisdom from book that finds us not too
    worthy?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RonO@21:1/5 to All on Mon Sep 4 16:52:52 2023
    On 9/4/2023 12:03 PM, Öö Tiib wrote:
    On Monday, 4 September 2023 at 18:10:25 UTC+3, RonO wrote:
    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/08/230830160828.htm

    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41477-023-01491-0

    Over a billion years ago we had eukaryotes, and some of them formed an
    endosymbiotic relationship with bacteria that could utilize oxygen for
    oxidative phosphorylation (our mitochondria), and some of these
    eukaryotes also developed an endosymbiotic relationship with
    photosynthetic bacteria. The photosynthetic eukaryotes evolved into
    what we call plants.

    These researchers looked at how algae respond to stress and determined
    that the genes used evolved within a 600 million year period before land
    plants evolved from algal ancestors. Terrestrial plants use these same
    stress response genes that allowed them to colonize a hostile
    terrestrial environment.

    The Reason to Believe IDiots claim that their intelligent designer is
    the Biblical God, and they also claim that the Bible is factually true.
    Before the ID scam was initiated by the ID perps at the Discovery
    Institute the Reason to Believe IDiots were just plain old earth
    Biblical creationists.

    https://reasons.org/single/creation-model-approach

    Unlike the ID perps the Reason to Believe IDiots claimed to be
    intelligent design advocates, but also claim that they never wanted to
    teach the junk in the public schools. They wanted to construct their
    creation model to support their religious beliefs.

    They failed.

    https://reasons.org/explore/publications/articles/summary-of-reasons-to-believes-testable-creation-model-1

    They had to reinterpret parts of the Bible so that the sun and moon did
    not have to be created on the fourth day (after the creation of land
    plants).

    Note that there are studies that claim that atmosphere was not very thick already 2.7 bya: <https://www.washington.edu/news/2016/05/09/early-earths-air-weighed-less-than-half-of-todays-atmosphere/>
    So it is unclear what there supposedly was that did hide sun, moon and
    stars until after land plants emerged.

    Reinterpreting the Bible to fit the Big Bang and fine tuning time table
    is their most major revision of the Bible. It is one that the YEC do
    not make. The cosmic history has the Reason to Believe IDiots stuck
    with the creation of the universe with the Big Bang over 13 billion
    years ago. It took around 8 billion years to produce the elements that
    our solar system was made of around 4.5 billion years ago. These
    elements were created by dying stars. They know that the sun was at the
    center of our solar system as it formed. The sun could not have been
    made on the fourth day of creation after plants existed on this planet.
    So they need some means to try to figure out how the Bible could not be
    so wrong about the creation. Even though the Bible uses the word "made"
    in describing the creation of the sun and moon, they have decided that
    they were not really made on the fourth day. As crazy as it may seem
    they have decided that their Biblical god was talking about making the
    sun and moon visible even though there wouldn't be any animals with eyes
    to see them until the next day of creation, and there wasn't any need
    for hiding them from god himself.

    It is just a denial of what is written in the Bible, just as they are in
    denial of quite a lot of what we know about nature that they can't cram
    into a Biblical time table.

    The IDiots at Reason to Believe may use the Top Six gap denial
    arguments, but they can't use them to build a plausible Biblical
    creation. To create their model of creation, they have to deny the
    denial. It is the reason why the Top Six, given to the IDiots in their
    order of occurrence, killed IDiocy on TO.

    Ron Okimoto


    Even though they use the fossil record for gap denial like the
    Cambrian explosion they have to deny that data to maintain the Biblical
    chronology that they want to preserve. So land plants have to be
    created before the sea creatures even though the Cambrian explosion
    denial tells them that sea creatures existed long before land plants.
    Not only that, but the transitional whale fossils have to be denied
    because they need whales to be among the sea creatures created after
    land plants, but before terrestrial vertebrates were created. There is
    very little doubt that the mammalian ancestors of whales were created
    long before whales were created. Whales are mammals, their mammalian
    predecessors are terrestrial vertebrates, but the Reason to Believe
    IDiots need sea mammals and birds to be created before their terrestrial
    vertebrate ancestors were created. They don't deal with mosasaurus and
    other aquatic reptiles because they do not want them to be the
    leviathans mentioned in the Bible.

    The ID scam "science" is just more science to deny. The Reason to
    Believe IDiotic denial of what the Top Six evidences for IDiocy mean to
    creationism is pretty much why the Top Six killed IDiocy on TO. The
    Reason to Believe IDiots may use the Top Six god-of-the-gaps denial the
    same way as the ID perps at the Discovery Institute, but in trying to
    build their biblical creation model they have to reject the Top Six as
    the best evidence for IDiocy. The intelligent designer of the Top Six
    is not the Biblical designer.

    The sad thing is that they have to deny their own denial because they
    want to deny that biological evolution has been occurring on this planet
    for billions of years. They could easily just use their excuse that a
    lot of things are not mentioned in the Bible as existing when everyone
    knows that they once existed. The sun and moon existed for billions of
    years before being mentioned as being created in the Bible. They could
    use that excuse for all the inconsistent biblical chronology, but they
    do not want to do it because the actual chronology means that biological
    evolution is likely the means of creation of life on earth, and that
    isn't biblical enough for them. Even though biological evolution is
    just one more thing that is not mentioned in the Bible, they can't be
    honest enough with themselves to accept what the science actually tells
    them. It is obviously the same for most of the creationists that became
    IDiots after the failure of scientific creationism. Not very many of
    them ever wanted to ever accomplish any IDiotic science because that
    would just be more science that had to be denied.

    They can't also be honest with themselves what Bible tells to them.
    It is actually quite good book about issues with us. The whole message
    of it felt (to me) that we are evil and adulterous, our temples are business centres, our authorities are corrupt and our judicial system is farce.
    Why to search deep scientific wisdom from book that finds us not too
    worthy?


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)