The truth is still very simple. Marginalizing subjectivity results in bad personal opinions, weird ideology, and mental illness. Which then very obviously and straightforwardly, leads to individual and societal catastrophy.the individual.
The fact obsessed academic people have no clue anymore about how to reason "carefully", and about what is "important", because they all suck at subjectivity. Now acdemics is a whole culture of being clueless about how subjectivity works, it is beyond
1. mass vaccination, during a pandemic
2. using eperimental mrna vaccine, on the entire population
3. mrna vaccines which are not local, and which lasts in the body a long time, which are parameters that are opposite an ideal vaccine
4. Using experimental lipids in a vaccine, for the entire population, which are known to cross the brain barrier
5. Using highly toxic graphene oxide in the production of vaccines.
6. Coercing people to take the vaccine
7. Censoring criticism of the vaccine, not engaging in scientific debate
8. Having no treatment plan at all for people getting covid, just sit and wait untill it gets so bad that you have to go to the hospital.
9. Throwing out perfectly good treatment like vitamin D, and antivirals like hcq, and ivermectine
10. Using lethal high risk unproven remdesivir
11. Masking children as young as 3 for hours on end, for years
12. making the research data into vaccines secret
13. Lying about the origins of the virus
And, on and on the list goes, of the total failure of academics, which is to say the failed personal judgment of academically educated people.
1. Creator / chooses / spiritual / subjective / opinion
2. Creation / chosen / material / objective / fact
Where subjective means, identified with a chosen opinion, and objective means, identified with a model of it. And "choosing" is explained in terms of spontaneity, that a decision can turn out one way or another, in the moment.
On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 4:50:44 PM UTC-4, mohammad...@gmail.com wrote:the individual.
The truth is still very simple. Marginalizing subjectivity results in bad personal opinions, weird ideology, and mental illness. Which then very obviously and straightforwardly, leads to individual and societal catastrophy.
The fact obsessed academic people have no clue anymore about how to reason "carefully", and about what is "important", because they all suck at subjectivity. Now acdemics is a whole culture of being clueless about how subjectivity works, it is beyond
1. mass vaccination, during a pandemic
2. using eperimental mrna vaccine, on the entire population
3. mrna vaccines which are not local, and which lasts in the body a long time, which are parameters that are opposite an ideal vaccine
4. Using experimental lipids in a vaccine, for the entire population, which are known to cross the brain barrier
5. Using highly toxic graphene oxide in the production of vaccines.
6. Coercing people to take the vaccine
7. Censoring criticism of the vaccine, not engaging in scientific debate 8. Having no treatment plan at all for people getting covid, just sit and wait untill it gets so bad that you have to go to the hospital.
9. Throwing out perfectly good treatment like vitamin D, and antivirals like hcq, and ivermectine
10. Using lethal high risk unproven remdesivir
11. Masking children as young as 3 for hours on end, for years
12. making the research data into vaccines secret
13. Lying about the origins of the virus
And, on and on the list goes, of the total failure of academics, which is to say the failed personal judgment of academically educated people.
1. Creator / chooses / spiritual / subjective / opinion
2. Creation / chosen / material / objective / fact
Where subjective means, identified with a chosen opinion, and objective means, identified with a model of it. And "choosing" is explained in terms of spontaneity, that a decision can turn out one way or another, in the moment.Fairly recently you promised a new variant would ripe through vaccinated people
this fall. Any updates on when? We are after all at the equinox. I'm wondering about
letting some subscriptions go, certainly whether or not to pay for a year ahead.
Your help is appreciated.
The truth is still very simple. Marginalizing subjectivity results in bad personal opinions, weird ideology, and mental illness. Which then very obviously and straightforwardly, leads to individual and societal catastrophy.
The fact obsessed academic people have no clue anymore about how to
reason "carefully", and about what is "important", because they all suck
at subjectivity. Now acdemics is a whole culture of being clueless about
how subjectivity works, it is beyond the individual.
1. mass vaccination, during a pandemic
2. using eperimental mrna vaccine, on the entire population
3. mrna vaccines which are not local, and which lasts in the body a long time, which are parameters that are opposite an ideal vaccine
4. Using experimental lipids in a vaccine, for the entire population,
which are known to cross the brain barrier
5. Using highly toxic graphene oxide in the production of vaccines.
6. Coercing people to take the vaccine
7. Censoring criticism of the vaccine, not engaging in scientific debate
8. Having no treatment plan at all for people getting covid, just sit and wait untill it gets so bad that you have to go to the hospital.
9. Throwing out perfectly good treatment like vitamin D, and antivirals
like hcq, and ivermectine
10. Using lethal high risk unproven remdesivir
11. Masking children as young as 3 for hours on end, for years
12. making the research data into vaccines secret
13. Lying about the origins of the virus
And, on and on the list goes, of the total failure of academics, which is
to say the failed personal judgment of academically educated people.
1. Creator / chooses / spiritual / subjective / opinion
2. Creation / chosen / material / objective / fact
Where subjective means, identified with a chosen opinion, and objective means, identified with a model of it. And "choosing" is explained in
terms of spontaneity, that a decision can turn out one way or another, in the moment.
On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 4:50:44 PM UTC-4, mohammad...@gmail.com wrote:
The truth is still very simple. Marginalizing subjectivity results in
bad personal opinions, weird ideology, and mental illness. Which then
very obviously and straightforwardly, leads to individual and societal catastrophy.
The fact obsessed academic people have no clue anymore about how to
reason "carefully", and about what is "important", because they all suck
at subjectivity. Now acdemics is a whole culture of being clueless about
how subjectivity works, it is beyond the individual.
1. mass vaccination, during a pandemic
2. using eperimental mrna vaccine, on the entire population
3. mrna vaccines which are not local, and which lasts in the body a long
time, which are parameters that are opposite an ideal vaccine
4. Using experimental lipids in a vaccine, for the entire population,
which are known to cross the brain barrier
5. Using highly toxic graphene oxide in the production of vaccines.
6. Coercing people to take the vaccine
7. Censoring criticism of the vaccine, not engaging in scientific debate
8. Having no treatment plan at all for people getting covid, just sit
and wait untill it gets so bad that you have to go to the hospital.
9. Throwing out perfectly good treatment like vitamin D, and antivirals
like hcq, and ivermectine
10. Using lethal high risk unproven remdesivir
11. Masking children as young as 3 for hours on end, for years
12. making the research data into vaccines secret
13. Lying about the origins of the virus
And, on and on the list goes, of the total failure of academics, which
is to say the failed personal judgment of academically educated people.
1. Creator / chooses / spiritual / subjective / opinion
2. Creation / chosen / material / objective / fact
Where subjective means, identified with a chosen opinion, and objective
means, identified with a model of it. And "choosing" is explained in
terms of spontaneity, that a decision can turn out one way or another, in the moment.
Fairly recently you promised a new variant would ripe through vaccinated people
this fall. Any updates on when? We are after all at the equinox. I'm wondering about
letting some subscriptions go, certainly whether or not to pay for a year ahead.
Your help is appreciated.
mohammad...@gmail.com <mohammad...@gmail.com> wrote:
The truth is still very simple. Marginalizing subjectivity results in bad personal opinions, weird ideology, and mental illness. Which then very obviously and straightforwardly, leads to individual and societal catastrophy.
The fact obsessed academic people have no clue anymore about how to
reason "carefully", and about what is "important", because they all suck at subjectivity. Now acdemics is a whole culture of being clueless about how subjectivity works, it is beyond the individual.
1. mass vaccination, during a pandemic
Makes sense, but the distribution of vaccines was inequitable across the globe.
2. using eperimental mrna vaccine, on the entire population
The entire population? Even in the US this is nowhere near true. If memory serves Israel had a decent vaccination uptake bur perhaps not entire. Other parts of the world were nowhere near entire.
3. mrna vaccines which are not local, and which lasts in the body a long time, which are parameters that are opposite an ideal vaccine
How long do these vaccines (or their spike protein products) last? How long in comparison does SARS-CoV-2 last? Which would you prefer?
4. Using experimental lipids in a vaccine, for the entire population, which are known to cross the brain barrier
5. Using highly toxic graphene oxide in the production of vaccines.
https://apnews.com/article/988165173107
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2023/03/28/fact-check-document-shows-graphene-used-test-covid-19-vaccine-not-make/11556190002/
6. Coercing people to take the vaccineI would have preferred more coercing. They had one job and failed. The
lives of the many over the misgivings of deluded kooks. If something deadlier than COVID virus goes pandemic we are so fucked because the
deluded kooks.
7. Censoring criticism of the vaccine, not engaging in scientific debateDisinformation should be nipped in the bud by social media giants. It kills people. There’s no scientific debate involved on the denier side. It’s just
a throwback to MMR-autism nonsense. Now pet owners are starting to question vaccinations for dogs and cats:
https://www.bu.edu/sph/news/articles/2023/nearly-half-of-dog-owners-are-hesitant-to-vaccinate-their-pets/
8. Having no treatment plan at all for people getting covid, just sit and wait untill it gets so bad that you have to go to the hospital.
There were monoclonals and antivirals. Plus steroids. The vaccines changed everything. The viruses were a bit more crafty than expected hence the current arms race. The virus side may be attenuating or the collective immunity dampening it. Eventually it may become yet another HCoV. There was that Russian thing:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8813723/
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1889–1890_pandemic
If a coronavirus, doubtfully a lab leak.
9. Throwing out perfectly good treatment like vitamin D, and antivirals like hcq, and ivermectineAt least Vitamin D has nutritional value.
The only potential value for ivermectin would possibly be in areas of the world where people with SARS-CoV-2 infection also have a parasitic worm load.
10. Using lethal high risk unproven remdesivir
11. Masking children as young as 3 for hours on end, for years
12. making the research data into vaccines secret
13. Lying about the origins of the virus
And, on and on the list goes, of the total failure of academics, which is to say the failed personal judgment of academically educated people.
1. Creator / chooses / spiritual / subjective / opinion
2. Creation / chosen / material / objective / fact
This gridlock of yours only serves to indicate severe monomania.
Where subjective means, identified with a chosen opinion, and objective means, identified with a model of it. And "choosing" is explained in
terms of spontaneity, that a decision can turn out one way or another, in the moment.
Facts do not care about your feelings.
14. You cannot control the dosage with mrna, because the body produces it.
Ofcourse you are yourself the murderer here, all the risks taken amount
to a reckless disregard for life, which is a criteria for intentional killing.
14. You cannot control the dosage with mrna, because the body produces it.
Ofcourse you are yourself the murderer here, all the risks taken amount to a reckless disregard for life, which is a criteria for intentional killing.
On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 9:35:45 AM UTC-4, mohammad...@gmail.com wrote:
14. You cannot control the dosage with mrna, because the body produces it.
Ofcourse you are yourself the murderer here, all the risks taken amount to aI know this is silly of me but curiosity has the better of me.
reckless disregard for life, which is a criteria for intentional killing.
What is this claim about not controlling the dosage of the mRNA vaccine because the body produces mRNA?
Do you understand that the vaccine is an mRNA of a specific sequence
of ribonucleosides that encode for something called the Spike protein?
Do you understand that human cells do not normally produce mRNAs
that encode for the Spike protein?
Do you understand that the cells that endocytose the anti-Covid mRNA vaccines don't synthesize any mRNA with sequences that encode for
the Spike protein? The only mRNA that encodes for the Spike protein
that they have comes from vaccine particles --- unless they get infected
by the actual SARS-Cov-2 virus, which produces its own viral mRNAs, including one which encodes the Spike protein.
I just don't understand what you imagine in behind your claim 14. Help me out.
APnews and usatoday, are known liars. I mean, what is the point of referencing liars? If you want to find out what is in the vaccine, then you have to analyze it. But ofcourse, this was forbidden to do, because of clownworld. But the limitedinvestigation that was done anyway, showed all sorts of contaminants in the vaccine. So then the next thing is to analyze the blood of vaccinated vs unvaccinated, and the graphene was found to be in the blood of the vaccinated. Do you understand that
14. You cannot control the dosage with mrna, because the body produces it.antibodies are matured. But I guess it doesn't matter anymore to take it in advance, when there are immune escape variants about pandemically.
Ofcourse you are yourself the murderer here, all the risks taken amount to a reckless disregard for life, which is a criteria for intentional killing.
It was predictable from the start that vaccinating during a pandemic, would lead to immune escape. This is why when you take some vaccination for going to some country, then you have to take it well in advance, complete your vaccination, so that the
The virus starts out a couple of miles from a lab where they are doing gain of function on coronaviruses.serving?
I know I have the motherload with the creationist conceptual scheme, the concepts of fact and opinion, the basics of reasoning. You just prove you are a total moron, every time you reject it.
Let's consider your emotional basis in reasoning. You make up a story that the virus was more crafty than expected. Or people were just wrong to vaccinate during a pandemic, because of it leading to immune escape. Isn't your emotional basis very self
Op vrijdag 22 september 2023 om 04:05:43 UTC+2 schreef *Hemidactylus*:
mohammad...@gmail.com <mohammad...@gmail.com> wrote:
The truth is still very simple. Marginalizing subjectivity results in bad personal opinions, weird ideology, and mental illness. Which then very obviously and straightforwardly, leads to individual and societal catastrophy.
The fact obsessed academic people have no clue anymore about how to reason "carefully", and about what is "important", because they all suck at subjectivity. Now acdemics is a whole culture of being clueless about how subjectivity works, it is beyond the individual.
1. mass vaccination, during a pandemic
Makes sense, but the distribution of vaccines was inequitable across the globe.
2. using eperimental mrna vaccine, on the entire population
The entire population? Even in the US this is nowhere near true. If memory serves Israel had a decent vaccination uptake bur perhaps not entire. Other parts of the world were nowhere near entire.
3. mrna vaccines which are not local, and which lasts in the body a long time, which are parameters that are opposite an ideal vaccine
How long do these vaccines (or their spike protein products) last? How long in comparison does SARS-CoV-2 last? Which would you prefer?
4. Using experimental lipids in a vaccine, for the entire population, which are known to cross the brain barrier
5. Using highly toxic graphene oxide in the production of vaccines.
https://apnews.com/article/988165173107
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2023/03/28/fact-check-document-shows-graphene-used-test-covid-19-vaccine-not-make/11556190002/
6. Coercing people to take the vaccineI would have preferred more coercing. They had one job and failed. The lives of the many over the misgivings of deluded kooks. If something deadlier than COVID virus goes pandemic we are so fucked because the deluded kooks.
7. Censoring criticism of the vaccine, not engaging in scientific debateDisinformation should be nipped in the bud by social media giants. It kills people. There’s no scientific debate involved on the denier side. It’s just
a throwback to MMR-autism nonsense. Now pet owners are starting to question vaccinations for dogs and cats:
https://www.bu.edu/sph/news/articles/2023/nearly-half-of-dog-owners-are-hesitant-to-vaccinate-their-pets/
8. Having no treatment plan at all for people getting covid, just sit and wait untill it gets so bad that you have to go to the hospital.
There were monoclonals and antivirals. Plus steroids. The vaccines changed everything. The viruses were a bit more crafty than expected hence the current arms race. The virus side may be attenuating or the collective immunity dampening it. Eventually it may become yet another HCoV. There was that Russian thing:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8813723/
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1889–1890_pandemic
If a coronavirus, doubtfully a lab leak.
9. Throwing out perfectly good treatment like vitamin D, and antivirals like hcq, and ivermectineAt least Vitamin D has nutritional value.
The only potential value for ivermectin would possibly be in areas of the world where people with SARS-CoV-2 infection also have a parasitic worm load.
10. Using lethal high risk unproven remdesivir
11. Masking children as young as 3 for hours on end, for years
12. making the research data into vaccines secret
13. Lying about the origins of the virus
And, on and on the list goes, of the total failure of academics, which is to say the failed personal judgment of academically educated people.
1. Creator / chooses / spiritual / subjective / opinion
2. Creation / chosen / material / objective / fact
This gridlock of yours only serves to indicate severe monomania.
Where subjective means, identified with a chosen opinion, and objective means, identified with a model of it. And "choosing" is explained in terms of spontaneity, that a decision can turn out one way or another, in the moment.
Facts do not care about your feelings.
With a normal vaccine, you can control how much vaccine you give to someone. You inject the right amount, and then it's destroyed. With the mrna, you inject it,
then the body starts producing spikes, which you cannot control how much spikes
the body will produce. And certainly, the amount is obviously going to vary wildly
between individuals.
14. You cannot control the dosage with mrna, because the body produces it.
Op vrijdag 22 september 2023 om 18:50:45 UTC+2 schreef Lawyer Daggett:
On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 9:35:45 AM UTC-4, mohammad...@gmail.com wrote:
14. You cannot control the dosage with mrna, because the body produces it.
Ofcourse you are yourself the murderer here, all the risks taken amount to aI know this is silly of me but curiosity has the better of me.
reckless disregard for life, which is a criteria for intentional killing.
What is this claim about not controlling the dosage of the mRNA vaccine because the body produces mRNA?
Do you understand that the vaccine is an mRNA of a specific sequence
of ribonucleosides that encode for something called the Spike protein?
Do you understand that human cells do not normally produce mRNAs
that encode for the Spike protein?
Do you understand that the cells that endocytose the anti-Covid mRNA vaccines don't synthesize any mRNA with sequences that encode for
the Spike protein? The only mRNA that encodes for the Spike protein
that they have comes from vaccine particles --- unless they get infected by the actual SARS-Cov-2 virus, which produces its own viral mRNAs, including one which encodes the Spike protein.
I just don't understand what you imagine in behind your claim 14. Help me out.
With a normal vaccine, you can control how much vaccine you give to someone. You inject the right amount, and then it's destroyed. With the mrna, you inject it, then the body starts producing spikes, which you cannot control how much spikes the bodywill produce. And certainly, the amount is obviously going to vary wildly between individuals.
Lawyer Daggett:
mohammad..rote:
--------------------14. You cannot control the dosage with mrna, because the body produces it.
Ofcourse you are yourself the murderer here, all the risks taken amount to aI know this is silly of me but curiosity has the better of me.
reckless disregard for life, which is a criteria for intentional killing.
What is this claim about not controlling the dosage of the mRNA vaccine because the body produces mRNA?
Do you understand that the vaccine is an mRNA of a specific sequence
of ribonucleosides that encode for something called the Spike protein?
Do you understand that human cells do not normally produce mRNAs
that encode for the Spike protein?
Do you understand that the cells that endocytose the anti-Covid mRNA vaccines don't synthesize any mRNA with sequences that encode for
the Spike protein? The only mRNA that encodes for the Spike protein
that they have comes from vaccine particles --- unless they get infected by the actual SARS-Cov-2 virus, which produces its own viral mRNAs, including one which encodes the Spike protein.
I just don't understand what you imagine in behind your claim 14. Help me out.
On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 3:05:45 PM UTC-4, mohammad...@gmail.com wrote:
With a normal vaccine, you can control how much vaccine you give to someone. >> You inject the right amount, and then it's destroyed. With the mrna, you inject it,
then the body starts producing spikes, which you cannot control how much spikes
the body will produce. And certainly, the amount is obviously going to vary wildly
between individuals.
Well now, thank you for responding. I have a few comments.
Firstly, this is a change from
14. You cannot control the dosage with mrna, because the body produces it.
To cut through it, your renewed complaint seems to be that you can't control the
dosage of the antigen, the Spike protein, as opposed to the dosage of the vaccine.
To avoid confusion, most people read "the vaccine" to be the stuff in the bottle
that gets sucked up into a syringe and then gets injected into your arm.
This isn't a trite bit of semantics as you specifically reference the dosage of mRNA
and go on to say that the body produces it(mRNA seems to be the antecedent to "it").
Your follow-up would seem to allude to "it" being the Spike protein. Indeed, the cells
that endocytose the vaccine do produce the Spike protein, from the vaccine's mRNA.
As you claim, with large forgiveness for extremely sloppy language, the ultimate dosage
of the Spike protein produced is not finely controlled.
I'm not clear on why you think this is a large problem. To shortcut future back and forth,
the expression of the vaccine mRNA is predominantly occurring in antigen presenting
cells, which are sacrificial cells with a short life-span. They function to eat threats,
chop them up, and display them on their cell surface. Where's the problem with them
doing that 2X or 5X fold?
Please explain where you see the biological problem.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 09:55:31 |
| Calls: | 10,387 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 14,060 |
| Messages: | 6,416,681 |