By comparing messages from a different server, I have recently
identified over a dozen messages since Oct 4. which were not
propagated by E-S. I neither checked for nor discerned a pattern to
those dropped posts.
As E-S is the only free Usenet server I know which is still in
operation, this should be a concern to some T.O. readers. Those who
choose to be willfully blind can ignore this post also.
On Sat, 14 Oct 2023 12:36:22 -0400, the following appearedI'm using both E-S and Solani. Both work fine.
in talk.origins, posted by jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>:
By comparing messages from a different server, I have recentlyThanks for the info. I'm not sure what the last sentence is
identified over a dozen messages since Oct 4. which were not
propagated by E-S. I neither checked for nor discerned a pattern to
those dropped posts.
As E-S is the only free Usenet server I know which is still in
operation, this should be a concern to some T.O. readers. Those who
choose to be willfully blind can ignore this post also.
supposed to mean, but not being "willfully blind" I suppose
I don't have to.
I'm using both E-S and Solani. Both work fine.
On Sat, 14 Oct 2023 12:36:22 -0400, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>:
By comparing messages from a different server, I have recentlyThanks for the info. I'm not sure what the last sentence is
identified over a dozen messages since Oct 4. which were not
propagated by E-S. I neither checked for nor discerned a pattern to
those dropped posts.
As E-S is the only free Usenet server I know which is still in
operation, this should be a concern to some T.O. readers. Those who
choose to be willfully blind can ignore this post also.
supposed to mean, but not being "willfully blind" I suppose
I don't have to.
On 2023-10-15 00:01:31 +0000, Bob Casanova said:
On Sat, 14 Oct 2023 12:36:22 -0400, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>:
By comparing messages from a different server, I have recentlyThanks for the info. I'm not sure what the last sentence is
identified over a dozen messages since Oct 4. which were not
propagated by E-S. I neither checked for nor discerned a pattern to
those dropped posts.
As E-S is the only free Usenet server I know which is still in
operation, this should be a concern to some T.O. readers. Those who
choose to be willfully blind can ignore this post also.
supposed to mean, but not being "willfully blind" I suppose
I don't have to.
I think most of us can afford the 5.5c per day that News.Individual.net
("the German server") costs me.
On Sat, 14 Oct 2023 20:41:17 -0500, DB Cates <cates_db@hotmail.com>
wrote:
I'm using both E-S and Solani. Both work fine.
I totally forgot about Solani. Thank you for pointing it out.
Some usenet readers are configurable to use multiple servers, and to >automatically search through them all. If that's your case, it's
unlikely you would see dropped posts from one or the other. Also,
since you don't post very often, it's unlikely you would have noticed
dropped posts even if you did miss any.
By comparing messages from a different server, I have recently
identified over a dozen messages since Oct 4. which were not
propagated by E-S. I neither checked for nor discerned a pattern to
those dropped posts.
As E-S is the only free Usenet server I know which is still in
operation, this should be a concern to some T.O. readers. Those who
choose to be willfully blind can ignore this post also.
On Sun, 15 Oct 2023 00:47:42 -0400, jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Sat, 14 Oct 2023 20:41:17 -0500, DB Cates <cates_db@hotmail.com>
wrote:
I'm using both E-S and Solani. Both work fine.
I totally forgot about Solani. Thank you for pointing it out.
Some usenet readers are configurable to use multiple servers, and to
automatically search through them all. If that's your case, it's
unlikely you would see dropped posts from one or the other. Also,
since you don't post very often, it's unlikely you would have noticed
dropped posts even if you did miss any.
Here's the latest post which did not appear on E-S:
<0aa38883-900b-4681-9ac6-22ef94b9129an@googlegroups.com>
<https://groups.google.com/g/talk.origins/c/JKnUO3rwKo4/m/GKwxgo48BQAJ>
Check to see if your newsreader got it.
--
To know less than we don't know is the nature of most knowledge
On 2023-10-15 00:01:31 +0000, Bob Casanova said:
On Sat, 14 Oct 2023 12:36:22 -0400, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>:
By comparing messages from a different server, I have recentlyThanks for the info. I'm not sure what the last sentence is
identified over a dozen messages since Oct 4. which were not
propagated by E-S. I neither checked for nor discerned a pattern to
those dropped posts.
As E-S is the only free Usenet server I know which is still in
operation, this should be a concern to some T.O. readers. Those who
choose to be willfully blind can ignore this post also.
supposed to mean, but not being "willfully blind" I suppose
I don't have to.
I think most of us can afford the 5.5c per day that News.Individual.net
("the German server") costs me.
On 2023-10-15 9:55 AM, jillery wrote:
On Sun, 15 Oct 2023 00:47:42 -0400, jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>I was a long time E-S user but during a serious outage I switched to
wrote:
On Sat, 14 Oct 2023 20:41:17 -0500, DB Cates <cates_db@hotmail.com>
wrote:
I'm using both E-S and Solani. Both work fine.
I totally forgot about Solani. Thank you for pointing it out.
Some usenet readers are configurable to use multiple servers, and to
automatically search through them all. If that's your case, it's
unlikely you would see dropped posts from one or the other. Also,
since you don't post very often, it's unlikely you would have noticed
dropped posts even if you did miss any.
Here's the latest post which did not appear on E-S:
<0aa38883-900b-4681-9ac6-22ef94b9129an@googlegroups.com>
<https://groups.google.com/g/talk.origins/c/JKnUO3rwKo4/m/GKwxgo48BQAJ>
Check to see if your newsreader got it.
--
To know less than we don't know is the nature of most knowledge
Solani and decided to switch permanently and transfered all my filters
and other preferences from E-S. For some reason (I don't remember
exactly what) I decided to check back in with E-S and reestablished its >presence in Thunderbird. I still use Solani with all its settings as my >primary feed but keep E-S with no filtering automatically keeping a
month's worth of headers available should i become aware of some posts
that I might be interested in that were filtered out in Solani.
The post you reference above was in my Solani feed but did not show up
in E-S.
On Sat, 14 Oct 2023 12:36:22 -0400, jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>
wrote:
By comparing messages from a different server, I have recently
identified over a dozen messages since Oct 4. which were not
propagated by E-S. I neither checked for nor discerned a pattern to
those dropped posts.
On Sun, 15 Oct 2023 00:47:42 -0400, jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Sat, 14 Oct 2023 20:41:17 -0500, DB Cates <cates_db@hotmail.com>
wrote:
I'm using both E-S and Solani. Both work fine.
I totally forgot about Solani. Thank you for pointing it out.
Some usenet readers are configurable to use multiple servers, and to
automatically search through them all. If that's your case, it's
unlikely you would see dropped posts from one or the other. Also,
since you don't post very often, it's unlikely you would have noticed
dropped posts even if you did miss any.
Here's the latest post which did not appear on E-S:
<0aa38883-900b-4681-9ac6-22ef94b9129an@googlegroups.com>
<https://groups.google.com/g/talk.origins/c/JKnUO3rwKo4/m/GKwxgo48BQAJ>
Check to see if your newsreader got it.
--
To know less than we don't know is the nature of most knowledge
Thus spake jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>
On Sat, 14 Oct 2023 12:36:22 -0400, jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>
wrote:
By comparing messages from a different server, I have recently
identified over a dozen messages since Oct 4. which were not
propagated by E-S. I neither checked for nor discerned a pattern to >>>those dropped posts.
Eternal-September and other servers have started scanning all postings >originating from Google Groups for spam due to a massive (~20.000 >articles/day) flood from Google Groups.
In addition, the mail headers contained in articles to moderated groups
have a certain "spammieness" about them which caused the articles to be >rejected by SpamAssassin.
I have adjusted the spam filter to ignore articles that have been
approved by a moderator, as it's the moderators' responsibility to
reject spam.
On 2023-10-15 18:07:38 +0000, Ray Banana said:
Пу́тін — хуйло́
I had guessed that that was Ukrainian or Byelorussian, but Google
Translate tells me that it's Kazakh. That surprised me, because I'd
expect Kazakh to be more Turkish-looking.
Anyway, no diagreement with the sentiment: Putin is a jerk
On Sun, 15 Oct 2023 20:07:38 +0200, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by Ray Banana
<ray...@raybanana.net>:
Thus spake jillery <69jp...@gmail.com>
On Sat, 14 Oct 2023 12:36:22 -0400, jillery <69jp...@gmail.com>
wrote:
By comparing messages from a different server, I have recently >>>identified over a dozen messages since Oct 4. which were not
propagated by E-S. I neither checked for nor discerned a pattern to >>>those dropped posts.
Eternal-September and other servers have started scanning all postings >originating from Google Groups for spam due to a massive (~20.000 >articles/day) flood from Google Groups.
In addition, the mail headers contained in articles to moderated groups >have a certain "spammieness" about them which caused the articles to be >rejected by SpamAssassin.
I have adjusted the spam filter to ignore articles that have been
approved by a moderator, as it's the moderators' responsibility to
reject spam.
Thanks for the update.
On Sun, 15 Oct 2023 20:07:38 +0200, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by Ray Banana
<rayban@raybanana.net>:
Thus spake jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>Thanks for the update.
On Sat, 14 Oct 2023 12:36:22 -0400, jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>
wrote:
By comparing messages from a different server, I have recently >>>>identified over a dozen messages since Oct 4. which were not
propagated by E-S. I neither checked for nor discerned a pattern to >>>>those dropped posts.
Eternal-September and other servers have started scanning all postings >>originating from Google Groups for spam due to a massive (~20.000 >>articles/day) flood from Google Groups.
In addition, the mail headers contained in articles to moderated groups >>have a certain "spammieness" about them which caused the articles to be >>rejected by SpamAssassin.
I have adjusted the spam filter to ignore articles that have been
approved by a moderator, as it's the moderators' responsibility to
reject spam.
Thus spake jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>
On Sat, 14 Oct 2023 12:36:22 -0400, jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>
wrote:
By comparing messages from a different server, I have recently
identified over a dozen messages since Oct 4. which were not
propagated by E-S. I neither checked for nor discerned a pattern to >>>those dropped posts.
Eternal-September and other servers have started scanning all postings >originating from Google Groups for spam due to a massive (~20.000 >articles/day) flood from Google Groups.
In addition, the mail headers contained in articles to moderated groups
have a certain "spammieness" about them which caused the articles to be >rejected by SpamAssassin.
I have adjusted the spam filter to ignore articles that have been
approved by a moderator, as it's the moderators' responsibility to
reject spam.
On Sun, 15 Oct 2023 11:41:07 -0700, Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off>
wrote:
On Sun, 15 Oct 2023 20:07:38 +0200, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by Ray Banana
<rayban@raybanana.net>:
Thus spake jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>Thanks for the update.
On Sat, 14 Oct 2023 12:36:22 -0400, jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>
wrote:
By comparing messages from a different server, I have recently >>>>>identified over a dozen messages since Oct 4. which were not >>>>>propagated by E-S. I neither checked for nor discerned a pattern to >>>>>those dropped posts.
Eternal-September and other servers have started scanning all postings >>>originating from Google Groups for spam due to a massive (~20.000 >>>articles/day) flood from Google Groups.
In addition, the mail headers contained in articles to moderated groups >>>have a certain "spammieness" about them which caused the articles to be >>>rejected by SpamAssassin.
I have adjusted the spam filter to ignore articles that have been >>>approved by a moderator, as it's the moderators' responsibility to
reject spam.
Failing to notice missing posts is an effect of willful blindness.
On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 12:01:45 -0400, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>:
On Sun, 15 Oct 2023 11:41:07 -0700, Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off>All that from "Thanks for the update".
wrote:
On Sun, 15 Oct 2023 20:07:38 +0200, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by Ray Banana
<rayban@raybanana.net>:
Thus spake jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>Thanks for the update.
On Sat, 14 Oct 2023 12:36:22 -0400, jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>
wrote:
By comparing messages from a different server, I have recently >>>>>>identified over a dozen messages since Oct 4. which were not >>>>>>propagated by E-S. I neither checked for nor discerned a pattern to >>>>>>those dropped posts.
Eternal-September and other servers have started scanning all postings >>>>originating from Google Groups for spam due to a massive (~20.000 >>>>articles/day) flood from Google Groups.
In addition, the mail headers contained in articles to moderated groups >>>>have a certain "spammieness" about them which caused the articles to be >>>>rejected by SpamAssassin.
I have adjusted the spam filter to ignore articles that have been >>>>approved by a moderator, as it's the moderators' responsibility to >>>>reject spam.
Failing to notice missing posts is an effect of willful blindness.
Anyway, that's your opinion; I disagree. And no, I'm not
interested in discussing it.
Failing to notice missing posts is an effect of willful blindness.
In the Seeing What You Don't See category:
Failing to notice missing posts is an effect of willful blindness.
On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 16:36:19 -0700, Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off>
wrote:
On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 12:01:45 -0400, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>:
On Sun, 15 Oct 2023 11:41:07 -0700, Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off>All that from "Thanks for the update".
wrote:
On Sun, 15 Oct 2023 20:07:38 +0200, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by Ray Banana
<rayban@raybanana.net>:
Thus spake jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>Thanks for the update.
On Sat, 14 Oct 2023 12:36:22 -0400, jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>
wrote:
By comparing messages from a different server, I have recently >>>>>>>identified over a dozen messages since Oct 4. which were not >>>>>>>propagated by E-S. I neither checked for nor discerned a pattern to >>>>>>>those dropped posts.
Eternal-September and other servers have started scanning all postings >>>>>originating from Google Groups for spam due to a massive (~20.000 >>>>>articles/day) flood from Google Groups.
In addition, the mail headers contained in articles to moderated groups >>>>>have a certain "spammieness" about them which caused the articles to be >>>>>rejected by SpamAssassin.
I have adjusted the spam filter to ignore articles that have been >>>>>approved by a moderator, as it's the moderators' responsibility to >>>>>reject spam.
Failing to notice missing posts is an effect of willful blindness.
All what? One single sentence? You're still exercising your inner
troll here. Give it a rest.
Anyway, that's your opinion; I disagree. And no, I'm not
interested in discussing it.
So stop trolling already. Not sure how even you *still* can't figure
that out.
On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 09:12:39 +0100, Martin Harran
<martinharran@gmail.com> wrote:
In the Seeing What You Don't See category:
Failing to notice missing posts is an effect of willful blindness.
Harran loves [to show] how he cowardly hides behind his killfiles, to post >about things he willfully knows nothing about. I bet 100 Quatloos
Isaak will approve this Chez Watt too.
On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 01:21:58 -0400, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>:
On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 16:36:19 -0700, Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off>Says the person who replied to a statement of thanks to
wrote:
On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 12:01:45 -0400, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>:
On Sun, 15 Oct 2023 11:41:07 -0700, Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> >>>>wrote:All that from "Thanks for the update".
On Sun, 15 Oct 2023 20:07:38 +0200, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by Ray Banana
<rayban@raybanana.net>:
Thus spake jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>Thanks for the update.
On Sat, 14 Oct 2023 12:36:22 -0400, jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote:
By comparing messages from a different server, I have recently >>>>>>>>identified over a dozen messages since Oct 4. which were not >>>>>>>>propagated by E-S. I neither checked for nor discerned a pattern to >>>>>>>>those dropped posts.
Eternal-September and other servers have started scanning all postings >>>>>>originating from Google Groups for spam due to a massive (~20.000 >>>>>>articles/day) flood from Google Groups.
In addition, the mail headers contained in articles to moderated groups >>>>>>have a certain "spammieness" about them which caused the articles to be >>>>>>rejected by SpamAssassin.
I have adjusted the spam filter to ignore articles that have been >>>>>>approved by a moderator, as it's the moderators' responsibility to >>>>>>reject spam.
Failing to notice missing posts is an effect of willful blindness.
All what? One single sentence? You're still exercising your inner
troll here. Give it a rest.
Anyway, that's your opinion; I disagree. And no, I'm not
interested in discussing it.
So stop trolling already. Not sure how even you *still* can't figure
that out.
another with an irrelevant comment about "willful
blindness", a la JTEM the Idiot. Go look in the mirror,
troll.
On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 08:11:33 -0700, Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off>
wrote:
On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 01:21:58 -0400, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>:
On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 16:36:19 -0700, Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off>Says the person who replied to a statement of thanks to
wrote:
On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 12:01:45 -0400, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>:
On Sun, 15 Oct 2023 11:41:07 -0700, Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> >>>>>wrote:All that from "Thanks for the update".
On Sun, 15 Oct 2023 20:07:38 +0200, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by Ray Banana
<rayban@raybanana.net>:
Thus spake jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>Thanks for the update.
On Sat, 14 Oct 2023 12:36:22 -0400, jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote:
By comparing messages from a different server, I have recently >>>>>>>>>identified over a dozen messages since Oct 4. which were not >>>>>>>>>propagated by E-S. I neither checked for nor discerned a pattern to >>>>>>>>>those dropped posts.
Eternal-September and other servers have started scanning all postings >>>>>>>originating from Google Groups for spam due to a massive (~20.000 >>>>>>>articles/day) flood from Google Groups.
In addition, the mail headers contained in articles to moderated groups >>>>>>>have a certain "spammieness" about them which caused the articles to be >>>>>>>rejected by SpamAssassin.
I have adjusted the spam filter to ignore articles that have been >>>>>>>approved by a moderator, as it's the moderators' responsibility to >>>>>>>reject spam.
Failing to notice missing posts is an effect of willful blindness.
All what? One single sentence? You're still exercising your inner
troll here. Give it a rest.
Anyway, that's your opinion; I disagree. And no, I'm not
interested in discussing it.
So stop trolling already. Not sure how even you *still* can't figure >>>that out.
another with an irrelevant comment about "willful
blindness", a la JTEM the Idiot. Go look in the mirror,
troll.
All that, from the troll who said he's "not interested in discussing"
it". That he claimed E-S is "working fine", without even checking
that they dropped over a dozen posts in the past few days, shows how
"willful blindness" applies to him. That, and his JTEM-style
irrelevant and asinine attacks.
On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 12:14:35 -0400, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>:
On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 08:11:33 -0700, Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off>"
wrote:
On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 01:21:58 -0400, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>:
On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 16:36:19 -0700, Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> >>>>wrote:Says the person who replied to a statement of thanks to
On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 12:01:45 -0400, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>:
On Sun, 15 Oct 2023 11:41:07 -0700, Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> >>>>>>wrote:All that from "Thanks for the update".
On Sun, 15 Oct 2023 20:07:38 +0200, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by Ray Banana
<rayban@raybanana.net>:
Thus spake jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>Thanks for the update.
On Sat, 14 Oct 2023 12:36:22 -0400, jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
By comparing messages from a different server, I have recently >>>>>>>>>>identified over a dozen messages since Oct 4. which were not >>>>>>>>>>propagated by E-S. I neither checked for nor discerned a pattern to >>>>>>>>>>those dropped posts.
Eternal-September and other servers have started scanning all postings >>>>>>>>originating from Google Groups for spam due to a massive (~20.000 >>>>>>>>articles/day) flood from Google Groups.
In addition, the mail headers contained in articles to moderated groups >>>>>>>>have a certain "spammieness" about them which caused the articles to be >>>>>>>>rejected by SpamAssassin.
I have adjusted the spam filter to ignore articles that have been >>>>>>>>approved by a moderator, as it's the moderators' responsibility to >>>>>>>>reject spam.
Failing to notice missing posts is an effect of willful blindness.
All what? One single sentence? You're still exercising your inner >>>>troll here. Give it a rest.
Anyway, that's your opinion; I disagree. And no, I'm not
interested in discussing it.
So stop trolling already. Not sure how even you *still* can't figure >>>>that out.
another with an irrelevant comment about "willful
blindness", a la JTEM the Idiot. Go look in the mirror,
troll.
All that, from the troll who said he's "not interested in discussing
it". That he claimed E-S is "working fine", without even checking
that they dropped over a dozen posts in the past few days, shows how >>"willful blindness" applies to him. That, and his JTEM-style
irrelevant and asinine attacks.
Mirror.
On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 09:12:39 +0100, Martin Harran
<martin...@gmail.com> wrote:
In the Seeing What You Don't See category:
Failing to notice missing posts is an effect of willful blindness.
Harran loves shows how he cowardly hides behind his killfiles, to post
about things he willfully knows nothing about. I bet 100 Quatloos
Isaak will approve this Chez Watt too.
On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 8:46:11?AM UTC-4, jillery wrote:
On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 09:12:39 +0100, Martin Harran
<martin...@gmail.com> wrote:
In the Seeing What You Don't See category:
Failing to notice missing posts is an effect of willful blindness.
Harran loves [to show] how he cowardly hides behind his killfiles, to post >> about things he willfully knows nothing about. I bet 100 Quatloos
Isaak will approve this Chez Watt too.
FWIW, it seems rather innocuous to me. The way I parse it, willful blindness >is one way that this failure can occur, but it does not mean that there can't be
other reasons, like the existence of missing posts not having a noticeable >effect on the posts that one reads.
With that backdrop, I think Martin's category is also innocuous, relying on >surreal humor without any sign of malice that I can see. I say this even though
killfiles can indeed be a form of willful blindness.
I have often written that if some people choose to hide their heads in the sand,
there is no reason for others to refrain from criticizing them.
The killfilers are drawing on an instinct learned from childhood
about "not talking about people behind their backs,"
but there is a qualifier, "that they won't say to their faces."
It is precisely this that the people being killfiled cannot do.
Peter Nyikos
On Sun, 15 Oct 2023 20:07:38 +0200, Ray Banana <rayban@raybanana.net>
wrote:
Thus spake jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>
On Sat, 14 Oct 2023 12:36:22 -0400, jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>
wrote:
By comparing messages from a different server, I have recently >>>>identified over a dozen messages since Oct 4. which were not
propagated by E-S. I neither checked for nor discerned a pattern to >>>>those dropped posts.
Eternal-September and other servers have started scanning all postings >>originating from Google Groups for spam due to a massive (~20.000 >>articles/day) flood from Google Groups.
In addition, the mail headers contained in articles to moderated groups >>have a certain "spammieness" about them which caused the articles to be >>rejected by SpamAssassin.
I have adjusted the spam filter to ignore articles that have been
approved by a moderator, as it's the moderators' responsibility to
reject spam.
That's good to know. Thank you for posting this.
On 2023-10-15 9:55 AM, jillery wrote:
On Sun, 15 Oct 2023 00:47:42 -0400, jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>I was a long time E-S user but during a serious outage I switched to
wrote:
On Sat, 14 Oct 2023 20:41:17 -0500, DB Cates <cates_db@hotmail.com>
wrote:
I'm using both E-S and Solani. Both work fine.
I totally forgot about Solani. Thank you for pointing it out.
Some usenet readers are configurable to use multiple servers, and to
automatically search through them all. If that's your case, it's
unlikely you would see dropped posts from one or the other. Also,
since you don't post very often, it's unlikely you would have noticed
dropped posts even if you did miss any.
Here's the latest post which did not appear on E-S:
<0aa38883-900b-4681-9ac6-22ef94b9129an@googlegroups.com>
<https://groups.google.com/g/talk.origins/c/JKnUO3rwKo4/m/GKwxgo48BQAJ>
Check to see if your newsreader got it.
--
To know less than we don't know is the nature of most knowledge
Solani and decided to switch permanently and transfered all my filters
and other preferences from E-S. For some reason (I don't remember
exactly what) I decided to check back in with E-S and reestablished its >presence in Thunderbird. I still use Solani with all its settings as my >primary feed but keep E-S with no filtering automatically keeping a
month's worth of headers available should i become aware of some posts
that I might be interested in that were filtered out in Solani
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 48:17:30 |
| Calls: | 10,397 |
| Calls today: | 5 |
| Files: | 14,066 |
| Messages: | 6,417,283 |
| Posted today: | 1 |