• Human Bottleneck: Two errors?

    From JTEM is my hero@21:1/5 to All on Mon Oct 16 21:54:30 2023
    This video is fascinating on a number of levels:

    https://youtu.be/IL_fiO00s6k?feature=shared

    First, it puts "Climate Change" into perspective.
    We're screaming towards another glacial period,
    what is colloquially known as an "Ice Age," and
    children are pissing themselves in fright over the
    threat of it growing slightly warmer, though still
    remaining well within the planet's norms.

    But that's not why I'm sharing it now...

    There's been recent claims about a human bottleneck,
    and it's even been said that this is what spawned
    the chromosome fusion, and the above video talks
    about these claims.

    Quite frankly, I'm not convinced that there was any
    bottleneck what so ever...

    We all know for a fact that there was *Way* more than
    one human population.

    Homo = Human.

    This so called "Bottleneck," if it's related to the chromosome
    fusion at all, is likely PRODUCED by it.

    The chromosome fusion caused what looks like a
    bottleneck. There was no bottleneck.

    If this chromosome fusion was a barrier to interbreeding,
    swapping genes, then we would have gone from a
    gene pool with contributions from many populations to
    just one.

    There. Done.

    Secondly, he explains that the dating of this event assumed
    24 years per human population.

    Does that sound right to you?

    I would suspect that it would be shorter than that, maybe
    20 years tops.

    I just did the Google and 18th century Prussia had a life
    expectancy of 24.7 years!

    Yes of course people lived into their 80s but, they weren't
    typical.

    In ancient Rome, half of everyone born (at least) was
    dead by 15. And most of the others never saw 40. The
    Romans were cleaner than most people. They had baths,
    they had toilets -- their streets didn't double as sewers --
    and the mid 30s was the best most people could hope
    for.

    Again, lots of people made it into what we consider old
    age. but not as a percentage. They weren't typical. They
    were probably the best fed and had the easiest lives...

    So this video debunks the stagnant climate myth of the
    Greta Gospels, and inadvertently spells out some of the
    issues with the "Bottleneck" claims.

    Oo! Also...

    There had to be a bottleneck after Toba. If Yellowstone
    goes off tomorrow we're in an "Ice Age." It would
    release the energy equivalent to 100,000 nuclear
    weapons, and many sources say that's conservative.

    Toba was roughly 2.5x Yellowstone...

    So you can't look at humans RIGHT NOW and see what
    humans looked like 1 million years ago.

    These cataclysms are numerous in the planet's history,
    and genetically they behave like successive filters,
    each screening out genes, maybe even different genes.

    It's simply NOT a test that tells you the answers they
    claim to find.

    And, besides, they're dating is off. There was a
    bottleneck roughly 800,000 years ago. The earth was
    hit by one or more asteroids... major impact event...

    Ruined there day, that did.

    And it hit right where the "Out of Asia" folks point to
    as the origins of humanity.

    Same for Toba.



    -- --

    https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/730359491090169856

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JTEM is my hero@21:1/5 to JTEM is my hero on Mon Oct 16 23:14:15 2023
    JTEM is my hero wrote:

    Secondly, he explains that the dating of this event assumed
    24 years per human population.

    Generation.

    They assumed 24 years per generation. And that can't be true.

    It couldn't even average out to that.


    -- --

    https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/730359491090169856

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)