• The purpose of sex

    From panther2020@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 3 15:46:45 2024
    XPost: alt.sex

    First day of school... the 10th grade biology teacher asks the students
    what they believed to be the purpose of sexual reproduction. every hand
    goes up:

    " To produce children, so there will always be someone around to mow
    grass, polish cars, put Ikea furniture together, you know, all of the
    things that grown people cannot do terribly well...

    However that turns out to be the wrong answer; the right answer is more complicated than that. Bacteria manage to reproduce themselves without
    sex and there are other simple creatures that do not participate in
    sexual reproduction.

    What sexual reproduction actually is, is an error correction system for
    Digital Data, similar to checksums or TCP/IP; in fact you could think of
    it as God's version of TCP/IP. The purpose is precisely to prevent
    mutations and recessive genes and basically all of the things that
    supposedly Drive evolution. Without sexual reproduction, every living
    thing on Earth above the level bacteria and worms and what not, would be
    dumb, dysfunctional, and ugly like Democrats.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From El Kabong@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 3 14:52:15 2024
    XPost: alt.sex

    panther2020 wrote:

    First day of school... the 10th grade biology teacher asks the students
    what they believed to be the purpose of sexual reproduction. every hand
    goes up:

    " To produce children, so there will always be someone around to mow
    grass, polish cars, put Ikea furniture together, you know, all of the
    things that grown people cannot do terribly well...

    Especially configuring smart phones and toasters.

    However that turns out to be the wrong answer; the right answer is more complicated than that. Bacteria manage to reproduce themselves without
    sex and there are other simple creatures that do not participate in
    sexual reproduction.

    What sexual reproduction actually is, is an error correction system for Digital Data, similar to checksums or TCP/IP; in fact you could think of
    it as God's version of TCP/IP. The purpose is precisely to prevent
    mutations and recessive genes and basically all of the things that
    supposedly Drive evolution. Without sexual reproduction, every living
    thing on Earth above the level bacteria and worms and what not, would be dumb, dysfunctional, and ugly like Democrats.

    Your post is an attempt at parody, right?

    Everyone knows the whole point of sexual reproduction is
    to create genetic diversity so that evolution can happen.
    And to give us something to look forward to as we plod
    thru each dull drab day.

    Asexual bacteria creating carbon copies of themselves
    makes for painfully slow adaptation and evolution.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Jackson@21:1/5 to El Kabong on Thu Jan 4 13:07:06 2024
    XPost: alt.sex

    On 2024-01-03, El Kabong <twang@the.noodle> wrote:
    panther2020 wrote:

    What sexual reproduction actually is, is an error correction system for
    Digital Data, similar to checksums or TCP/IP; in fact you could think of
    it as God's version of TCP/IP. The purpose is precisely to prevent
    mutations and recessive genes and basically all of the things that
    supposedly Drive evolution. Without sexual reproduction, every living
    thing on Earth above the level bacteria and worms and what not, would be
    dumb, dysfunctional, and ugly like Democrats.

    Your post is an attempt at parody, right?

    Everyone knows the whole point of sexual reproduction is
    to create genetic diversity so that evolution can happen.
    And to give us something to look forward to as we plod
    thru each dull drab day.

    Asexual bacteria creating carbon copies of themselves
    makes for painfully slow adaptation and evolution.


    This takes me back ...

    Williams, G.C. 1975. Sex and Evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.

    Maynard Smith, J. (1978d) The Evolution of Sex. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-29302-2
    and his notion of the "two-fold cost of sex".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Zen Cycle@21:1/5 to and asexual reproduction - which wa on Thu Jan 4 13:09:39 2024
    On 1/3/2024 4:46 PM, panther2020 wrote:

    First day of school... the 10th grade biology teacher asks the students
    what they believed to be the purpose of sexual reproduction. every hand
    goes up:

    " To produce children, so there will always be someone around to mow
    grass, polish cars, put Ikea furniture together, you know, all of the
    things that grown people cannot do terribly well...

    For an anecdote to be believable, it has to be at least plausible. It
    isn't likely that asking a room full of 15 year olds what the purpose of
    sexual reproduction is would result in an answer from any of them that
    sounds like it was generated by an AI algorithm at dadjokes.com, let
    alone unanimity in the answer.

    However that turns out to be the wrong answer; the right answer is more complicated than that. Bacteria manage to reproduce themselves without
    sex and there are other simple creatures that do not participate in
    sexual reproduction.

    Congratulations, you managed to identify the difference between sexual
    and asexual reproduction - which wasn't the question asked of the
    hypothetical students.


    What sexual reproduction actually is, is an error correction system for Digital Data,

    No, it isn't. Error correction is a _part_ of DNA replication, which
    isn't exclusive to sexual reproduction, it occurs in asexual
    reproduction as well.

    similar to checksums or TCP/IP; in fact you could think of
    it as God's version of TCP/IP.

    In order for an analogy to be believable, it has to at at least have
    some semblance to the process being analogized. I'm not seeing much
    similarity between a DNA strand unwinding > base pairing and data
    communication systems. Data duplication would be a better analogy.

    Besides that error correction in TCP/IP consists of Parity, CRC, and Foward/backward error correction (FEC/BEC), all of which are numerically calculated based on the numerical content of the data packets. If
    there's an error, it doesn't get fixed. The system asks for a
    retransmission (FEC requires redundant packets to begin with). The
    TCP\IP error correction doesn't assess the intent of the data, only that
    there was a discrepancy of the calculated value vs the read value. DNA
    error correction reads the "intent" of the "data", and repairs it to
    what it should be. It's vastly more complicated than simple TCP/IP error correction/detection protocols.

    The purpose is precisely to prevent
    mutations

    How's that workin' out for ya?

    and recessive genes

    DNA error correction is designed to prevent recessive genes? I wasn't
    aware of that.

    and basically all of the things that
    supposedly Drive evolution.

    hmmmmm.....You might want to read up on 'selection pressure'. Last I
    knew, DNA replication had little to do with influencing the environment,
    but I could be wrong.

    Without sexual reproduction, every living
    thing on Earth above the level bacteria and worms and what not, would be dumb, dysfunctional, and ugly like Democrats.

    Ah, I see. I didn't realize I was dealing with a magatard.
    Never mind.

    --
    Add xx to reply

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Zen Cycle@21:1/5 to erik simpson on Thu Jan 4 14:05:33 2024
    On 1/4/2024 1:20 PM, erik simpson wrote:
    On 1/4/24 10:09 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 1/3/2024 4:46 PM, panther2020 wrote:

    First day of school... the 10th grade biology teacher asks the
    students what they believed to be the purpose of sexual reproduction.
    every hand goes up:

    " To produce children, so there will always be someone around to mow
    grass, polish cars, put Ikea furniture together, you know, all of the
    things that grown people cannot do terribly well...

    For an anecdote to be believable, it has to be at least plausible. It
    isn't likely that asking a room full of 15 year olds what the purpose
    of sexual reproduction is would result in an answer from any of them
    that sounds like it was generated by an AI algorithm at dadjokes.com,
    let alone unanimity in the answer.

    However that turns out to be the wrong answer; the right answer is
    more complicated than that. Bacteria manage to reproduce themselves
    without sex and there are other simple creatures that do not
    participate in sexual reproduction.

    Congratulations, you managed to identify the difference between sexual
    and asexual reproduction - which wasn't the question asked of the
    hypothetical students.


    What sexual reproduction actually is, is an error correction system
    for Digital Data,

    No, it isn't. Error correction is a _part_ of DNA replication, which
    isn't exclusive to sexual reproduction, it occurs in asexual
    reproduction as well.

    similar to checksums or TCP/IP; in fact you could think of it as
    God's version of TCP/IP.

    In order for an analogy to be believable, it has to at at least have
    some semblance to the process being analogized. I'm not seeing much
    similarity between a DNA strand unwinding > base pairing and data
    communication systems. Data duplication would be a better analogy.

    Besides that error correction in TCP/IP consists of Parity, CRC, and
    Foward/backward error correction (FEC/BEC), all of which are
    numerically calculated based on the numerical content of the data
    packets. If there's an error,  it doesn't get fixed. The system asks
    for a retransmission (FEC requires redundant packets to begin with).
    The TCP\IP error correction doesn't assess the intent of the data,
    only that there was a discrepancy of the calculated value vs the read
    value. DNA error correction reads the "intent" of the "data", and
    repairs it to what it should be. It's vastly more complicated than
    simple TCP/IP error correction/detection protocols.

    The purpose is precisely to prevent mutations

    How's that workin' out for ya?

    and recessive genes

    DNA error correction is designed to prevent recessive genes? I wasn't
    aware of that.

    and basically all of the things that supposedly Drive evolution.

    hmmmmm.....You might want to read up on 'selection pressure'. Last I
    knew, DNA replication had little to do with influencing the
    environment, but I could be wrong.

    Without sexual reproduction, every living thing on Earth above the
    level bacteria and worms and what not, would be dumb, dysfunctional,
    and ugly like Democrats.

    Ah, I see. I didn't realize I was dealing with a magatard.
    Never mind.

    Yes, indeed.  He's infested SBP as well. Killfiles are your friend.


    I was a little suspicious when I saw the cross posting to alt.sex
    (though I didn't bite on that). Thanks

    --
    Add xx to reply

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ernest Major@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jan 4 20:34:24 2024
    On 04/01/2024 18:09, Zen Cycle wrote:

    The purpose of sexual reproduction, or rather the reason sexual
    reproduction persists, is a difficult question. I believe that the
    current consensus is that it's an anti-parasite adaptation - by
    increasing the diversity in the population it gives the parasite a more
    fuzzier target to aim at, and reduces the chance of taking out all of an organisms progeny.


    What sexual reproduction actually is, is an error correction system
    for Digital Data,

    No, it isn't. Error correction is a _part_ of DNA replication, which
    isn't exclusive to sexual reproduction, it occurs in asexual
    reproduction as well.

    similar to checksums or TCP/IP; in fact you could think of it as God's
    version of TCP/IP.

    In order for an analogy to be believable, it has to at at least have
    some semblance to the process being analogized. I'm not seeing much similarity between a DNA strand unwinding > base pairing and data communication systems. Data duplication would be a better analogy.

    Besides that error correction in TCP/IP consists of Parity, CRC, and Foward/backward error correction (FEC/BEC), all of which are numerically calculated based on the numerical content of the data packets. If
    there's an error,  it doesn't get fixed. The system asks for a retransmission (FEC requires redundant packets to begin with). The
    TCP\IP error correction doesn't assess the intent of the data, only that there was a discrepancy of the calculated value vs the read value. DNA
    error correction reads the "intent" of the "data", and repairs it to
    what it should be. It's vastly more complicated than simple TCP/IP error correction/detection protocols.

    The purpose is precisely to prevent mutations

    How's that workin' out for ya?

    and recessive genes

    DNA error correction is designed to prevent recessive genes? I wasn't
    aware of that.

    He was claiming that sexual reproduction weeds out recessive genes, not
    that DNA error correction does. (He wrote "error correction", not "DNA
    error correction".)

    On the one hand haploid asexual organisms don't have recessive genes,
    which at first sight contradicts the claim that the purpose of sexual reproduction is to prevent recessive genes. (One could entertain the
    hypothesis that diploidy evolved to increase organismal resilience to
    mutation, and sexual reproduction then evolved to purge recessive genes.)

    Just as I am skeptical that there is such as thing as a truly neutral
    mutation (rather than one where the selection pressure is swamped by
    drift) I am skeptical that there is a purely recessive mutation. However
    sexual reproduction does purge *deleterious* recessive alleles, by
    exposing them to greater selection pressures in the homozygous state
    (the grain of truth in what he wrote). One the other hand it *amplifies* *beneficial* recessive alleles.

    One thing that occurs during sexual reproduction is gene conversion,
    where all or part of one allele or paralog is converted to the sequence
    of its partner. This is a case where sexual reproduction actually causes mutations.

    Apart from the anti-parasite role, it has been argued that sexual
    reproduction is advantageous in that it allows beneficial mutations from separate lineages to be combined, rather than requiring them to occur sequentially in a single lineage.


    and basically all of the things that supposedly Drive evolution.

    hmmmmm.....You might want to read up on 'selection pressure'. Last I
    knew, DNA replication had little to do with influencing the environment,
    but I could be wrong.

    --
    alias Ernest Major

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From panther2020@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 5 05:04:52 2024
    XPost: alt.sex

    On 1/3/24 15:46, panther2020 wrote:



    What sexual reproduction actually is, is an error correction system for Digital Data, similar to checksums or TCP/IP; in fact you could think of
    it as God's version of TCP/IP. The purpose is precisely to prevent
    mutations and recessive genes and basically all of the things that
    supposedly Drive evolution.

    Unfortunately, defeating that purpose is not terribly difficult for
    those with a mind to do that. All you really need to do is marry and
    have children with your own siblings or cousins. Inbreeding in fact
    cannot be fixed by economics, it works the same way for rich and poor alike.

    You can see a particularly garish example of how it works for poor
    people by searching on "Pakistan rat people".

    For rich people, search on "Spanish hapsburgs". Those folks had more
    than enough money for any rational purpose and it did not help them.
    Every single one of them, men and women alike, looked just like the Frankenstein monster.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From zen cycle@21:1/5 to Ernest Major on Fri Jan 5 06:07:37 2024
    On 1/4/2024 3:34 PM, Ernest Major wrote:
    On 04/01/2024 18:09, Zen Cycle wrote:

    The purpose of sexual reproduction, or rather the reason sexual
    reproduction persists, is a difficult question. I believe that the
    current consensus is that it's an anti-parasite adaptation - by
    increasing the diversity in the population it gives the parasite a more fuzzier target to aim at, and reduces the chance of taking out all of an organisms progeny.

    AFAIC it's as fuzzy an answers as 'what is the purpose of life'. In any
    case the answer is _not_ "it's an error correction system" regardless of analogies to data communication .

    <SNIP>


    and recessive genes

    DNA error correction is designed to prevent recessive genes? I wasn't
    aware of that.

    He was claiming that sexual reproduction weeds out recessive genes, not
    that DNA error correction does. (He wrote "error correction", not "DNA
    error correction".)

    That begs the question: Is that to imply that there are other 'error correction' systems associated with recessive gene suppression besides
    DNA error correction, specifically in the context of sexual vs asexual reproduction? Again, I'm not aware of any.



    <snip>


    One thing that occurs during sexual reproduction is gene conversion,
    where all or part of one allele or paralog is converted to the sequence
    of its partner. This is a case where sexual reproduction actually causes mutations. > > Apart from the anti-parasite role, it has been argued that sexual
    reproduction is advantageous in that it allows beneficial mutations from separate lineages to be combined, rather than requiring them to occur sequentially in a single lineage.

    Both paragraphs negate the main gist of the OPs argument that sexual reproduction _prevents_ mutations

    I have no formal training in any field of genetics, feel free to correct
    me if I'm wrong.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Burkhard@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 5 03:19:33 2024
    On Wednesday, January 3, 2024 at 9:47:28 PM UTC, panther2020 wrote:
    First day of school... the 10th grade biology teacher asks the students
    what they believed to be the purpose of sexual reproduction. every hand
    goes up:

    " To produce children, so there will always be someone around to mow
    grass, polish cars, put Ikea furniture together, you know, all of the
    things that grown people cannot do terribly well...

    However that turns out to be the wrong answer; the right answer is more complicated than that. Bacteria manage to reproduce themselves without
    sex and there are other simple creatures that do not participate in
    sexual reproduction.

    What sexual reproduction actually is, is an error correction system for Digital Data, similar to checksums or TCP/IP; in fact you could think of
    it as God's version of TCP/IP. The purpose is precisely to prevent
    mutations and recessive genes and basically all of the things that supposedly Drive evolution. Without sexual reproduction, every living
    thing on Earth above the level bacteria and worms and what not, would be dumb, dysfunctional, and ugly like Democrats.

    sex leads to cultures to invent dancing, and as dancing is the ultimate purpose of the universe,
    this proves creationism is true

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ernest Major@21:1/5 to zen cycle on Fri Jan 5 12:12:56 2024
    On 05/01/2024 11:07, zen cycle wrote:
    On 1/4/2024 3:34 PM, Ernest Major wrote:
    On 04/01/2024 18:09, Zen Cycle wrote:

    The purpose of sexual reproduction, or rather the reason sexual
    reproduction persists, is a difficult question. I believe that the
    current consensus is that it's an anti-parasite adaptation - by
    increasing the diversity in the population it gives the parasite a
    more fuzzier target to aim at, and reduces the chance of taking out
    all of an organisms progeny.

    AFAIC it's as fuzzy an answers as 'what is the purpose of life'. In any
    case the answer is _not_ "it's an error correction system" regardless of analogies to data communication .

    <SNIP>


    and recessive genes

    DNA error correction is designed to prevent recessive genes? I wasn't
    aware of that.

    He was claiming that sexual reproduction weeds out recessive genes,
    not that DNA error correction does. (He wrote "error correction", not
    "DNA error correction".)

    That begs the question: Is that to imply that there are other 'error correction' systems associated with recessive gene suppression besides
    DNA error correction, specifically in the context of sexual vs asexual reproduction? Again, I'm not aware of any.



    <snip>


    One thing that occurs during sexual reproduction is gene conversion,
    where all or part of one allele or paralog is converted to the
    sequence of its partner. This is a case where sexual reproduction
    actually causes mutations. > > Apart from the anti-parasite role, it
    has been argued that sexual
    reproduction is advantageous in that it allows beneficial mutations
    from separate lineages to be combined, rather than requiring them to
    occur sequentially in a single lineage.

    Both paragraphs negate the main gist of the OPs argument that sexual reproduction _prevents_ mutations

    I have no formal training in any field of genetics, feel free to correct
    me if I'm wrong.


    I was mostly agreeing with you (and elaborating) and disagreeing with
    him - the grain of truth in what he wrote is that sexual reproduction
    increases the rate of elimination of recessive genes from a gene pool
    and if you squint at that with an essentialist view of the genome you
    could describe that as error correction. I don't think there were any
    grains of truth in what he wrote.

    (My formal training in biology ended with 8th grade, so I may have even
    less formal training in genetics that you do.)

    --
    alias Ernest Major

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Zen Cycle@21:1/5 to Burkhard on Fri Jan 5 08:22:41 2024
    On 1/5/2024 6:19 AM, Burkhard wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 3, 2024 at 9:47:28 PM UTC, panther2020 wrote:
    First day of school... the 10th grade biology teacher asks the students
    what they believed to be the purpose of sexual reproduction. every hand
    goes up:

    " To produce children, so there will always be someone around to mow
    grass, polish cars, put Ikea furniture together, you know, all of the
    things that grown people cannot do terribly well...

    However that turns out to be the wrong answer; the right answer is more
    complicated than that. Bacteria manage to reproduce themselves without
    sex and there are other simple creatures that do not participate in
    sexual reproduction.

    What sexual reproduction actually is, is an error correction system for
    Digital Data, similar to checksums or TCP/IP; in fact you could think of
    it as God's version of TCP/IP. The purpose is precisely to prevent
    mutations and recessive genes and basically all of the things that
    supposedly Drive evolution. Without sexual reproduction, every living
    thing on Earth above the level bacteria and worms and what not, would be
    dumb, dysfunctional, and ugly like Democrats.

    sex leads to cultures to invent dancing, and as dancing is the ultimate purpose of the universe,
    this proves creationism is true


    https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0087277/

    --
    Add xx to reply

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)