The two pillars of reasoning are fact & opinion. The evolutionists are undermining the concept of opinion, making reasoning dysfunction, leading to catastrophe.-------------------------------------
It was in the news that the airtraffic controllers in the USA are hired based on diversity, instead of on merit, leading to incompetent airtraffic controllers.
Because nobody flying, not even billionaires in their private planes, can escape the airtraffic controllers, it is shown that all ideas about a conspiratorial nefarious group of people manipulating policy for their own benefit, are wrong.
It shows that the bad policy is just about mental disorder, mental illness. The bad covid policy, the bad immigration policy, the gender ideology etc. It is all just about mental disorder.
The disorder starts with the psychological pressure for people to do their best. This leads people to mistakenly define choosing in terms of figuring out what is best, instead of defining it in terms of spontaneous expression of the subjective spirit.
This then leads to a pattern of corruption in the mind, of all concepts that are based on choosing. Most importantly, the concept of subjectivity becomes dysfunctional, leading to bad personal opinions, weird ideology, and mental illness.
This pattern of corruption is recognizable in the way people do their best for things, in an exaggerated sort of way. It's because these people have lost the connection to their basic emotions, and only have the feelings left associated to doing their best. So when these people do their best for some cause, it's not really about solving the problem, they are just trying to get some feelings going for their emotional survival.
As for example the steel drive in Mao's China. The socialists contrived to produce more steel, by melting down neccessary farming equipment, resulting in famine. They were hellbent to do it, because of needing these feelings associated to doing their best, in producing the optimal amount of steel.
Another aspect of this disorder, is to objectify emotions and personal character, leading to racism. Because when choosing is explained in terms of figuring out what is best, then the logic is used of as like how a chesscomputer calculates a move. There are no subjective aspects in these computations. So then when this logic of choosing is transposed on to human beings, then the emotions and personal character, must be objectified.
The ultra-darwinist philosopher Dennett, explicitly defines choosing in terms of this logic of how a chesscomputer calculates a move. There is no doubt in my mind, that Dennett must secretly be a racist, because that is a neccessary logical consequenc of his ideas. Although this racism would not neccessarily be the traditional racism, but have more sophisticated ideas about variation.
Natural selection theory, is basically the same logic of a chesscomputer calculating a move. In that there are variants representing options, which then go through a process, with an inevitable result of many variants going extinct, and one variant surviving.
It is because of this similarity to the logic of choosing, that evolutionists use subjective terminology in their theory, differential reproductive "success". And then the entire life cycle of an organism is explained using subjective terminology, in regards to this "success". Which subjective words are all re-assigned an objective meaning. In sexual selection, even the more esoteric subjective words such as "beauty", are re-assigned an objective meaning.
Which obviously undermines the properly subjective use, of subjective terminology, by replacing the subjective meaning, with objective meaning.
Moreover, evolution theory is held in opposition to creationist theory, while the concept of subjectivity is an inherently creationist concept.
1. Creator / chooses / spiritual / subjective / opinion
2. Creation / chosen / material / objective / fact
Where choosing is defined in terms of spontaneity, that a decision can turn out one way or another in the moment. And choosing is the mechanism of creation, how a creation originates. And subjective means, identified with a chosen opinion, and objective means, identified with a model of it.
Accepting evolution theory therefore results in a reduced awareness, of the subjective human spirit choosing things, in human affairs. Which leads to the aforementioned bad personal opinions, resulting in inevitable catastrophe.
The importance of subjectivity in reasoning, is systematically underestimated. Subjectivity is marginalized. But if you don't "care" about the truth, then no matter how much you are focused on the facts, you will not find the relevant facts of the matter. You will then just only find the facts, that quickly gratify, and not find relevant facts that are emotionally difficult to deal with.
So evolution theory basically works as a catalyst on the commonly human error to conceive of choosing in terms of figuring out what is best.
"And as natural selection works solely by and for the good of each being, all corporeal and mental endowments will tend to progress towards perfection." (C. Darwin, Origin of Species)
To solve the problem, there can be no doubt whatsoever that the use of subjective terminology in science theories must be abandoned, and that creationism must be reinstated.
Otherwise we will have an unending chain of catastrophe, which will also affect the evolutionists themselves, just as like the diversity policies for air traffic controllers affect everyone that flies.
mohammad...@gmail.com wrote:
The two pillars of reasoning are fact & opinion. The evolutionists are undermining the concept of opinion, making reasoning dysfunction, leading to
catastrophe.
It was in the news that the airtraffic controllers in the USA are hired based
on diversity, instead of on merit, leading to incompetent airtraffic controllers.
Because nobody flying, not even billionaires in their private planes, can escape the airtraffic controllers, it is shown that all ideas about a conspiratorial nefarious group of people manipulating policy for their own benefit, are wrong.
It shows that the bad policy is just about mental disorder, mental illness. The bad covid policy, the bad immigration policy, the gender ideology etc. It
is all just about mental disorder.
The disorder starts with the psychological pressure for people to do their best. This leads people to mistakenly define choosing in terms of figuring out what is best, instead of defining it in terms of spontaneous expression of the subjective spirit.
This then leads to a pattern of corruption in the mind, of all concepts that
are based on choosing. Most importantly, the concept of subjectivity becomes
dysfunctional, leading to bad personal opinions, weird ideology, and mental illness.
This pattern of corruption is recognizable in the way people do their best for things, in an exaggerated sort of way. It's because these people have lost the connection to their basic emotions, and only have the feelings left
associated to doing their best. So when these people do their best for some cause, it's not really about solving the problem, they are just trying to get
some feelings going for their emotional survival.
As for example the steel drive in Mao's China. The socialists contrived to produce more steel, by melting down neccessary farming equipment, resulting in famine. They were hellbent to do it, because of needing these feelings associated to doing their best, in producing the optimal amount of steel.
Another aspect of this disorder, is to objectify emotions and personal character, leading to racism. Because when choosing is explained in terms of
figuring out what is best, then the logic is used of as like how a chesscomputer calculates a move. There are no subjective aspects in these computations. So then when this logic of choosing is transposed on to human beings, then the emotions and personal character, must be objectified.
The ultra-darwinist philosopher Dennett, explicitly defines choosing in terms
of this logic of how a chesscomputer calculates a move. There is no doubt in
my mind, that Dennett must secretly be a racist, because that is a neccessary
logical consequenc of his ideas. Although this racism would not neccessarily
be the traditional racism, but have more sophisticated ideas about variation.
Natural selection theory, is basically the same logic of a chesscomputer calculating a move. In that there are variants representing options, which then go through a process, with an inevitable result of many variants going extinct, and one variant surviving.
It is because of this similarity to the logic of choosing, that evolutionists
use subjective terminology in their theory, differential reproductive "success". And then the entire life cycle of an organism is explained using subjective terminology, in regards to this "success". Which subjective words
are all re-assigned an objective meaning. In sexual selection, even the more
esoteric subjective words such as "beauty", are re-assigned an objective meaning.
Which obviously undermines the properly subjective use, of subjective terminology, by replacing the subjective meaning, with objective meaning.
Moreover, evolution theory is held in opposition to creationist theory, while
the concept of subjectivity is an inherently creationist concept.
1. Creator / chooses / spiritual / subjective / opinion
2. Creation / chosen / material / objective / fact
Where choosing is defined in terms of spontaneity, that a decision can turn out one way or another in the moment. And choosing is the mechanism of creation, how a creation originates. And subjective means, identified with a
chosen opinion, and objective means, identified with a model of it.
Accepting evolution theory therefore results in a reduced awareness, of the subjective human spirit choosing things, in human affairs. Which leads to the
aforementioned bad personal opinions, resulting in inevitable catastrophe.
The importance of subjectivity in reasoning, is systematically underestimated. Subjectivity is marginalized. But if you don't "care" about the truth, then no matter how much you are focused on the facts, you will not
find the relevant facts of the matter. You will then just only find the facts, that quickly gratify, and not find relevant facts that are emotionally
difficult to deal with.
So evolution theory basically works as a catalyst on the commonly human error
to conceive of choosing in terms of figuring out what is best.
"And as natural selection works solely by and for the good of each being, all
corporeal and mental endowments will tend to progress towards perfection." (C. Darwin, Origin of Species)
To solve the problem, there can be no doubt whatsoever that the use of subjective terminology in science theories must be abandoned, and that creationism must be reinstated.
Otherwise we will have an unending chain of catastrophe, which will also affect the evolutionists themselves, just as like the diversity policies for-------------------------------------
air traffic controllers affect everyone that flies.
I wouldn't call it catastrophic, but your faulty reasoning led to the
screed posted above.
Op dinsdag 9 januari 2024 om 20:02:34 UTC+1 schreef Dexter:
mohammad...@gmail.com wrote:
The two pillars of reasoning are fact & opinion. The evolutionists are undermining the concept of opinion, making reasoning dysfunction, leading to catastrophe.
It was in the news that the airtraffic controllers in the USA are hired based on diversity, instead of on merit, leading to incompetent airtraffic controllers.
Because nobody flying, not even billionaires in their private planes, can escape the airtraffic controllers, it is shown that all ideas about a conspiratorial nefarious group of people manipulating policy for their own benefit, are wrong.
It shows that the bad policy is just about mental disorder, mental illness. The bad covid policy, the bad immigration policy, the gender ideology etc. It is all just about mental disorder.
The disorder starts with the psychological pressure for people to do their best. This leads people to mistakenly define choosing in terms of figuring out what is best, instead of defining it in terms of spontaneous expression of the subjective spirit.
This then leads to a pattern of corruption in the mind, of all concepts that are based on choosing. Most importantly, the concept of subjectivity becomes dysfunctional, leading to bad personal opinions, weird ideology, and mental illness.
This pattern of corruption is recognizable in the way people do their best for things, in an exaggerated sort of way. It's because these people have lost the connection to their basic emotions, and only have the feelings left associated to doing their best. So when these people do their best for some cause, it's not really about solving the problem, they are just trying to get some feelings going for their emotional survival.
As for example the steel drive in Mao's China. The socialists contrived to produce more steel, by melting down neccessary farming equipment, resulting in famine. They were hellbent to do it, because of needing these feelings associated to doing their best, in producing the optimal amount of steel.
Another aspect of this disorder, is to objectify emotions and personal character, leading to racism. Because when choosing is explained in terms of figuring out what is best, then the logic is used of as like how a chesscomputer calculates a move. There are no subjective aspects in these computations. So then when this logic of choosing is transposed on to human beings, then the emotions and personal character, must be objectified.
The ultra-darwinist philosopher Dennett, explicitly defines choosing in terms of this logic of how a chesscomputer calculates a move. There is no doubt in my mind, that Dennett must secretly be a racist, because that is a neccessary logical consequenc of his ideas. Although this racism would not neccessarily be the traditional racism, but have more sophisticated ideas about variation.
Natural selection theory, is basically the same logic of a chesscomputer calculating a move. In that there are variants representing options, which then go through a process, with an inevitable result of many variants going extinct, and one variant surviving.
It is because of this similarity to the logic of choosing, that evolutionists use subjective terminology in their theory, differential reproductive "success". And then the entire life cycle of an organism is explained using subjective terminology, in regards to this "success". Which subjective words are all re-assigned an objective meaning. In sexual selection, even the more esoteric subjective words such as "beauty", are re-assigned an objective meaning.
Which obviously undermines the properly subjective use, of subjective terminology, by replacing the subjective meaning, with objective meaning.
Moreover, evolution theory is held in opposition to creationist theory, while the concept of subjectivity is an inherently creationist concept.
1. Creator / chooses / spiritual / subjective / opinion
2. Creation / chosen / material / objective / fact
Where choosing is defined in terms of spontaneity, that a decision can turn out one way or another in the moment. And choosing is the mechanism of creation, how a creation originates. And subjective means, identified with a chosen opinion, and objective means, identified with a model of it.
Accepting evolution theory therefore results in a reduced awareness, of the subjective human spirit choosing things, in human affairs. Which leads to the aforementioned bad personal opinions, resulting in inevitable catastrophe.
The importance of subjectivity in reasoning, is systematically underestimated. Subjectivity is marginalized. But if you don't "care" about the truth, then no matter how much you are focused on the facts, you will not find the relevant facts of the matter. You will then just only find the facts, that quickly gratify, and not find relevant facts that are emotionally difficult to deal with.
So evolution theory basically works as a catalyst on the commonly human error to conceive of choosing in terms of figuring out what is best.
"And as natural selection works solely by and for the good of each being, all corporeal and mental endowments will tend to progress towards perfection." (C. Darwin, Origin of Species)
To solve the problem, there can be no doubt whatsoever that the use of subjective terminology in science theories must be abandoned, and that creationism must be reinstated.
Otherwise we will have an unending chain of catastrophe, which will also affect the evolutionists themselves, just as like the diversity policies for air traffic controllers affect everyone that flies.-------------------------------------
I wouldn't call it catastrophic, but your faulty reasoning led to the screed posted above.
There is no error in the reasoning, otherwise you would have surely pointed it out. You must just be a socialist piece of shit who is found out, that you reject the entire subjective part of reality.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 15:08:03 |
| Calls: | 10,389 |
| Files: | 14,061 |
| Messages: | 6,416,909 |