dgb (David) expressed precisely :
On 28 Feb 2024 at 17:48:36 GMT, "Dgb" <dgb@usenet.invalid> wrote:
On 26 Feb 2024 at 11:18:39 GMT, "FromTheRafters" <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> >>> wrote:
erik simpson formulated on Sunday :
On 2/25/24 3:44 PM, David B. wrote:Does GG still archive NNTP articles?
On 25 Feb 2024 at 23:35:17 GMT, "erik simpson" <eastside.erik@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote:I've deleted all but this year's discussions. Go to Google Groups and you
On 2/25/24 3:24 PM, David B. wrote:
On 25 Feb 2024 at 23:04:07 GMT, "erik simpson"The focus on Intellligent Design (ID). This has been kicked around on >>>>>>> this group for many years, and has its proponents. Obviously, I'm not >>>>>>> one of them. I don't propose to re-argue this subject. Check through >>>>>>> prior discussions here if you want to get the flavor of it. I'm not >>>>>>> interested in getting involved in such a discussion.
<eastside.erik@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2/25/24 2:49 PM, David B. wrote:I've not heard of the organisation before. I've read here:-
On 25 Feb 2024 at 18:52:30 GMT, "erik simpson"Senior Fellow at Discovery Institute says all you need to know. >>>>>>>>
<eastside.erik@gmail.com>
wrote:
For the record, I think
Behe is pretty close to being a crank.
What evidence do you have for reaching such a conclusion, Erik? >>>>>>>>>>
TIA
https://www.discovery.org/about/
What do you feel is contentious?
OK. Thanks, Erik.
If you can point me to any specific past discussion, it will be much >>>>>> appreciated.
can see everything except the most recent posts. Posts by Peter Nyikos >>>>> and the responses to his posts will discover the hottest discussions. >>>>
Yes. Why come here to ask, Ray?
*BUMP*!
What I meant was, does Google 'continue' to archive NNTP articles
considering that they no longer peer.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 546 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 09:06:06 |
Calls: | 10,387 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 14,060 |
Messages: | 6,416,669 |