John Harshman wrote:
Not sure what you mean. I have no problem scrolling in Thunderbird.
There can be hundreds even thousands of headers, I have nine or
10 on the screen at one time, the one thread I'm looking for is
maybe 42 headers down, I've go to scroll down...
It doesn't seem to want to handle it. Very imprecise. There
doesn't seem to be a good way to do it, not without marking
everything in between as read.
On 6/6/24 5:07 PM, Pro Plyd wrote:
JTEM wrote:The nature of the complainant explains even more.
John Harshman wrote:
Not sure what you mean. I have no problem scrolling in Thunderbird.
There can be hundreds even thousands of headers, I have nine or
10 on the screen at one time, the one thread I'm looking for is
maybe 42 headers down, I've go to scroll down...
It doesn't seem to want to handle it. Very imprecise. There
doesn't seem to be a good way to do it, not without marking
everything in between as read.
I've used t-bird for mail, with hundreds of messages
(one archive folder has over 5000). On an older machine
I had with 4 gb of ram everything was slow (which would
include scrolling). Now I have machines with 16 and
32 gb of ram so paging is a non issue. If you've only
got 4 gb of ram that would explain a lot.
On 6/6/24 5:07 PM, Pro Plyd wrote:
JTEM wrote:The nature of the complainant explains even more.
John Harshman wrote:
Not sure what you mean. I have no problem scrolling in Thunderbird.
There can be hundreds even thousands of headers, I have nine or
10 on the screen at one time, the one thread I'm looking for is
maybe 42 headers down, I've go to scroll down...
It doesn't seem to want to handle it. Very imprecise. There
doesn't seem to be a good way to do it, not without marking
everything in between as read.
I've used t-bird for mail, with hundreds of messages
(one archive folder has over 5000). On an older machine
I had with 4 gb of ram everything was slow (which would
include scrolling). Now I have machines with 16 and
32 gb of ram so paging is a non issue. If you've only
got 4 gb of ram that would explain a lot.
On 6/6/24 5:12 PM, erik simpson wrote:
On 6/6/24 5:07 PM, Pro Plyd wrote:Still can't figure out how he can have only 9 or 10 headers at a time.
JTEM wrote:The nature of the complainant explains even more.
John Harshman wrote:
Not sure what you mean. I have no problem scrolling in Thunderbird.
There can be hundreds even thousands of headers, I have nine or
10 on the screen at one time, the one thread I'm looking for is
maybe 42 headers down, I've go to scroll down...
It doesn't seem to want to handle it. Very imprecise. There
doesn't seem to be a good way to do it, not without marking
everything in between as read.
I've used t-bird for mail, with hundreds of messages
(one archive folder has over 5000). On an older machine
I had with 4 gb of ram everything was slow (which would
include scrolling). Now I have machines with 16 and
32 gb of ram so paging is a non issue. If you've only
got 4 gb of ram that would explain a lot.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 497 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 12:46:31 |
Calls: | 9,784 |
Calls today: | 3 |
Files: | 13,748 |
Messages: | 6,187,389 |