On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 18:34:32 -0400
JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:

Okay so this isn't new, I've been talking about this stuff for
years...

You love, erm, exotic fanciful "theories" that have, at best, a vague scientific basis. And you snip and swear at other posters. Why oh why do
you think anyone at all would take you seriously?

</rhetorical question>, [stands back for abuse].


--
Bah, and indeed Humbug.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Kerr-Mudd, John <admin@127.0.0.1> wrote:

On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 18:34:32 -0400
JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:

Okay so this isn't new, I've been talking about this stuff for
years...

You love, erm, exotic fanciful "theories" that have, at best, a vague scientific basis. And you snip and swear at other posters. Why oh why do
you think anyone at all would take you seriously?

</rhetorical question>, [stands back for abuse].

JTEM is a narcissistic crank best left ignored.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thu, 01 Aug 2024 19:29:59 +0000, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by *Hemidactylus*
<ecphoric@allspamis.invalid>:

Kerr-Mudd, John <admin@127.0.0.1> wrote:

On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 18:34:32 -0400
JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:

Okay so this isn't new, I've been talking about this stuff for
years...

You love, erm, exotic fanciful "theories" that have, at best, a vague
scientific basis. And you snip and swear at other posters. Why oh why do
you think anyone at all would take you seriously?

</rhetorical question>, [stands back for abuse].

JTEM is a narcissistic crank best left ignored.

Agreed. I prefer the "auto-ignore" technique, but it tends
to take a bit of heat from flamewar aficionados, as well as
from at least one semi-literate nutbar who referred to it as
"censorship". Oy...

--

Bob C.

"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"

- Isaac Asimov

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thu, 01 Aug 2024 21:59:30 -0400, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>:

On Thu, 01 Aug 2024 15:51:58 -0700, Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off>
wrote:

On Thu, 01 Aug 2024 19:29:59 +0000, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by *Hemidactylus*
<ecphoric@allspamis.invalid>:

Kerr-Mudd, John <admin@127.0.0.1> wrote:

On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 18:34:32 -0400
JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:

Okay so this isn't new, I've been talking about this stuff for
years...

You love, erm, exotic fanciful "theories" that have, at best, a vague
scientific basis. And you snip and swear at other posters. Why oh why do >>>> you think anyone at all would take you seriously?

</rhetorical question>, [stands back for abuse].

JTEM is a narcissistic crank best left ignored.

Agreed. I prefer the "auto-ignore" technique, but it tends
to take a bit of heat from flamewar aficionados, as well as
from at least one semi-literate nutbar who referred to it as
"censorship". Oy...

For someone who claims to prefer blinding yourself to what JTEM says,
you sure do have a lot to say about what JTEM says

Do I? Cite to the multitudinous times I've had "a lot to
say" about JTEM's rants, please.

, a tacit admission of willful ignorance.

Refusing to listen to stupidity is not a vice.

Reminds me of another nutbar who regularly
brags about his killfile.

Assuming you're referring to me, cite to those "regular
brags", please. I've probably mentioned it around five or
six times over the past couple of years, and only when it
was relevant to the discussion.

You seem to have taken my first comment ("flamewar
aficionado") personally, which indicates you correctly saw
yourself in it; your current post ("blinding yourself",
"willful ignorance", "nutbar") simply confirms that
assessment. You will not, of course, drag me in again.

The second clause, of course, referred to a long-gone nutbar
named, IIRC, Schafley.

--

Bob C.

"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"

- Isaac Asimov

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Sat, 03 Aug 2024 05:16:16 -0400, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>:


<snip>

...You will not, of course, drag me in again.

Read the above for comprehension.


--

Bob C.

"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"

- Isaac Asimov

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

JTEM wrote:

Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:

You love, erm,

I honestly don't give a fuck what you think about me. It
couldn't matter less. In fact, just the thought that you
believe it to be relevant to ANY thread, ANY subject set
aside wonder and confirms with utter certainty that you
are as stupid as you portray yourself.

exotic fanciful "theories" that have, at best, a vague
scientific basis.

So testing ideas have, at best, a vague scientific basis?

Because that was what my post was about: Scientifically
testing a claim. Yes, testing a claim.

And you snip and swear at other posters.

And this is why. Your "Feelings" mask your stupidity,
from you. Because you "Feel" so strongly you believe
your misunderstandings & misrepresentations are valid,
BECAUSE they are in sync with your FEELINGS.

So a reminder: It was about scientifically testing an
idea. These things can be scientifically tested. This
should not have triggered you, this news. The fact that
it did signals something wrong here, with the collective.

-------------------------------------

Seems you clearly care enough to respond. At least you
could try to make your actions match your words. This
newsgroup would be better off is you did.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)