On Thu, 01 Aug 2024 21:59:30 -0400, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>:
On Thu, 01 Aug 2024 15:51:58 -0700, Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off>
wrote:
On Thu, 01 Aug 2024 19:29:59 +0000, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by *Hemidactylus*
<ecphoric@allspamis.invalid>:
Kerr-Mudd, John <admin@127.0.0.1> wrote:Agreed. I prefer the "auto-ignore" technique, but it tends
On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 18:34:32 -0400JTEM is a narcissistic crank best left ignored.
JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:
You love, erm, exotic fanciful "theories" that have, at best, a vague >>>> scientific basis. And you snip and swear at other posters. Why oh why do >>>> you think anyone at all would take you seriously?
Okay so this isn't new, I've been talking about this stuff for
years...
</rhetorical question>, [stands back for abuse].
to take a bit of heat from flamewar aficionados, as well as
from at least one semi-literate nutbar who referred to it as >>"censorship". Oy...
For someone who claims to prefer blinding yourself to what JTEM says,
you sure do have a lot to say about what JTEM says
Do I? Cite to the multitudinous times I've had "a lot to
say" about JTEM's rants, please.
, a tacit admission of willful ignorance.
Refusing to listen to stupidity is not a vice.
Reminds me of another nutbar who regularly
brags about his killfile.
Assuming you're referring to me, cite to those "regular
brags", please. I've probably mentioned it around five or
six times over the past couple of years, and only when it
was relevant to the discussion.
You seem to have taken my first comment ("flamewar
aficionado") personally, which indicates you correctly saw
yourself in it; your current post ("blinding yourself",
"willful ignorance", "nutbar") simply confirms that
assessment. You will not, of course, drag me in again.
The second clause, of course, referred to a long-gone nutbar
named, IIRC, Schafley.
On Fri, 02 Aug 2024 10:16:02 -0700
Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> wrote:
On Thu, 01 Aug 2024 21:59:30 -0400, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>:
On Thu, 01 Aug 2024 15:51:58 -0700, Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off>Do I? Cite to the multitudinous times I've had "a lot to
wrote:
On Thu, 01 Aug 2024 19:29:59 +0000, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by *Hemidactylus*
<ecphoric@allspamis.invalid>:
Kerr-Mudd, John <admin@127.0.0.1> wrote:Agreed. I prefer the "auto-ignore" technique, but it tends
On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 18:34:32 -0400JTEM is a narcissistic crank best left ignored.
JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:
You love, erm, exotic fanciful "theories" that have, at best, a vague >> >>>> scientific basis. And you snip and swear at other posters. Why oh why do
Okay so this isn't new, I've been talking about this stuff for
years...
you think anyone at all would take you seriously?
</rhetorical question>, [stands back for abuse].
to take a bit of heat from flamewar aficionados, as well as
from at least one semi-literate nutbar who referred to it as
"censorship". Oy...
For someone who claims to prefer blinding yourself to what JTEM says,
you sure do have a lot to say about what JTEM says
say" about JTEM's rants, please.
Refusing to listen to stupidity is not a vice.
, a tacit admission of willful ignorance.
Assuming you're referring to me, cite to those "regular
Reminds me of another nutbar who regularly
brags about his killfile.
brags", please. I've probably mentioned it around five or
six times over the past couple of years, and only when it
was relevant to the discussion.
You seem to have taken my first comment ("flamewar
aficionado") personally, which indicates you correctly saw
yourself in it; your current post ("blinding yourself",
"willful ignorance", "nutbar") simply confirms that
assessment. You will not, of course, drag me in again.
The second clause, of course, referred to a long-gone nutbar
named, IIRC, Schafley.
Please don't feed the troll(s)
On Fri, 2 Aug 2024 18:44:03 +0100, the following appeared in
talk.origins, posted by "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1>:
On Fri, 02 Aug 2024 10:16:02 -0700I have most of them in my Special Children File. But this
Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> wrote:
On Thu, 01 Aug 2024 21:59:30 -0400, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>:
On Thu, 01 Aug 2024 15:51:58 -0700, Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off>Do I? Cite to the multitudinous times I've had "a lot to
wrote:
On Thu, 01 Aug 2024 19:29:59 +0000, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by *Hemidactylus*
<ecphoric@allspamis.invalid>:
Kerr-Mudd, John <admin@127.0.0.1> wrote:Agreed. I prefer the "auto-ignore" technique, but it tends
On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 18:34:32 -0400JTEM is a narcissistic crank best left ignored.
JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:
You love, erm, exotic fanciful "theories" that have, at best, a vague >>>>>>> scientific basis. And you snip and swear at other posters. Why oh why do
Okay so this isn't new, I've been talking about this stuff for >>>>>>>> years...
you think anyone at all would take you seriously?
</rhetorical question>, [stands back for abuse].
to take a bit of heat from flamewar aficionados, as well as
from at least one semi-literate nutbar who referred to it as
"censorship". Oy...
For someone who claims to prefer blinding yourself to what JTEM says,
you sure do have a lot to say about what JTEM says
say" about JTEM's rants, please.
Refusing to listen to stupidity is not a vice.
, a tacit admission of willful ignorance.
Assuming you're referring to me, cite to those "regular
Reminds me of another nutbar who regularly
brags about his killfile.
brags", please. I've probably mentioned it around five or
six times over the past couple of years, and only when it
was relevant to the discussion.
You seem to have taken my first comment ("flamewar
aficionado") personally, which indicates you correctly saw
yourself in it; your current post ("blinding yourself",
"willful ignorance", "nutbar") simply confirms that
assessment. You will not, of course, drag me in again.
The second clause, of course, referred to a long-gone nutbar
named, IIRC, Schafley.
Please don't feed the troll(s)
one isn't a troll in the classic sense.
Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> wrote:
On Fri, 2 Aug 2024 18:44:03 +0100, the following appeared inJillery isn’t a troll and has provided some good, knowledgable, on topic >posts here over the years. Easily triggered so maybe it is better practice >not to poke the bear. Mutual forbearance (forgive the pun).
talk.origins, posted by "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1>:
On Fri, 02 Aug 2024 10:16:02 -0700I have most of them in my Special Children File. But this
Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> wrote:
On Thu, 01 Aug 2024 21:59:30 -0400, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>:
On Thu, 01 Aug 2024 15:51:58 -0700, Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off>Do I? Cite to the multitudinous times I've had "a lot to
wrote:
On Thu, 01 Aug 2024 19:29:59 +0000, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by *Hemidactylus*
<ecphoric@allspamis.invalid>:
Kerr-Mudd, John <admin@127.0.0.1> wrote:Agreed. I prefer the "auto-ignore" technique, but it tends
On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 18:34:32 -0400JTEM is a narcissistic crank best left ignored.
JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:
You love, erm, exotic fanciful "theories" that have, at best, a vague >>>>>>>> scientific basis. And you snip and swear at other posters. Why oh why do
Okay so this isn't new, I've been talking about this stuff for >>>>>>>>> years...
you think anyone at all would take you seriously?
</rhetorical question>, [stands back for abuse].
to take a bit of heat from flamewar aficionados, as well as
from at least one semi-literate nutbar who referred to it as
"censorship". Oy...
For someone who claims to prefer blinding yourself to what JTEM says, >>>>> you sure do have a lot to say about what JTEM says
say" about JTEM's rants, please.
Refusing to listen to stupidity is not a vice.
, a tacit admission of willful ignorance.
Assuming you're referring to me, cite to those "regular
Reminds me of another nutbar who regularly
brags about his killfile.
brags", please. I've probably mentioned it around five or
six times over the past couple of years, and only when it
was relevant to the discussion.
You seem to have taken my first comment ("flamewar
aficionado") personally, which indicates you correctly saw
yourself in it; your current post ("blinding yourself",
"willful ignorance", "nutbar") simply confirms that
assessment. You will not, of course, drag me in again.
The second clause, of course, referred to a long-gone nutbar
named, IIRC, Schafley.
Please don't feed the troll(s)
one isn't a troll in the classic sense.
On Fri, 02 Aug 2024 22:43:41 +0000, *Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote:
Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> wrote:
On Fri, 2 Aug 2024 18:44:03 +0100, the following appeared inJillery isn’t a troll and has provided some good, knowledgable, on topic >> posts here over the years. Easily triggered so maybe it is better practice >> not to poke the bear. Mutual forbearance (forgive the pun).
talk.origins, posted by "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1>:
On Fri, 02 Aug 2024 10:16:02 -0700I have most of them in my Special Children File. But this
Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> wrote:
On Thu, 01 Aug 2024 21:59:30 -0400, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>:
On Thu, 01 Aug 2024 15:51:58 -0700, Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> >>>>>> wrote:Do I? Cite to the multitudinous times I've had "a lot to
On Thu, 01 Aug 2024 19:29:59 +0000, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by *Hemidactylus*
<ecphoric@allspamis.invalid>:
Kerr-Mudd, John <admin@127.0.0.1> wrote:Agreed. I prefer the "auto-ignore" technique, but it tends
On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 18:34:32 -0400JTEM is a narcissistic crank best left ignored.
JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:
You love, erm, exotic fanciful "theories" that have, at best, a vague >>>>>>>>> scientific basis. And you snip and swear at other posters. Why oh why do
Okay so this isn't new, I've been talking about this stuff for >>>>>>>>>> years...
you think anyone at all would take you seriously?
</rhetorical question>, [stands back for abuse].
to take a bit of heat from flamewar aficionados, as well as
from at least one semi-literate nutbar who referred to it as
"censorship". Oy...
For someone who claims to prefer blinding yourself to what JTEM says, >>>>>> you sure do have a lot to say about what JTEM says
say" about JTEM's rants, please.
Refusing to listen to stupidity is not a vice.
, a tacit admission of willful ignorance.
Assuming you're referring to me, cite to those "regular
Reminds me of another nutbar who regularly
brags about his killfile.
brags", please. I've probably mentioned it around five or
six times over the past couple of years, and only when it
was relevant to the discussion.
You seem to have taken my first comment ("flamewar
aficionado") personally, which indicates you correctly saw
yourself in it; your current post ("blinding yourself",
"willful ignorance", "nutbar") simply confirms that
assessment. You will not, of course, drag me in again.
The second clause, of course, referred to a long-gone nutbar
named, IIRC, Schafley.
Please don't feed the troll(s)
one isn't a troll in the classic sense.
What you characterize as "easily triggered" is instead merely noting
the mindless and baseless personal attacks from posters exercising
their inner trolls.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 498 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 44:48:37 |
| Calls: | 9,800 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 13,752 |
| Messages: | 6,189,824 |