• Re: Claims of intelligent design of plants

    From Anthk NM@21:1/5 to RonO on Sat Jul 26 06:31:20 2025
    On 2025-07-22, RonO <rokimoto557@gmail.com> wrote:
    https://evolutionnews.org/2025/07/green-creatures-the-intelligent-design-of-plants/

    MarkE represents the ID perps ability to con the rubes with stupid
    denial arguments. Plants are engineered and must have been designed.
    MarkE exemplifies the stupidity of this type of ID scam con the rubes argument.

    Most of the creationist rubes that support the ID scam will never accept
    how the designer designed plants on this planet. They are the result of
    a very long evolutionary process. The rubes do not want the plants to
    have been designed the way that they were designed.

    Plants were not the first lifeforms created on this planet. The crop
    plants described in the Bible did not evolve until long after
    terrestrial vertebrates were wandering around on dry land. Land plants
    would have been designed using algae adapted to fresh water lakes and
    rivers, and would evolved hundreds of millions of years after sea
    creatures already had existed. Angiosperm plants evolved less than 200 million years ago when dinos were becoming the rulers of the landscape,
    and grasses around a hundred million years later.

    The intelligent design science should be rejected by the majority of YEC support for the ID scam. Nature isn't Biblical and any real science is
    not going to support Biblical creationism.

    Ron Okimoto


    Given how humans build a waste zone near a recrational area, I find
    that 'god designer' must have been a novice intern.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)