no creation either way
there is only "The Whole" and experience
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Set_theory
here is my logic behind "The Whole" being conscious ...
https://www.dalekelly.org/godhead.html
1) I am conscious.
2) I am part of "The Whole".
3) "The Whole" is part Me.
4) "The Whole" is part conscious.
“The Whole” having consciousness of its own implies Pantheism.Pantheism
means that everything is God.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pantheism
Advaita has a related ancient history of Pantheism in Vedanta.
--
Mystery -> https://www.dalekelly.org/
no creation either way
there is only "The Whole" and experience
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Set_theory
here is my logic behind "The Whole" being conscious ...
https://www.dalekelly.org/godhead.html
1) I am conscious.
2) I am part of "The Whole".
3) "The Whole" is part Me.
4) "The Whole" is part conscious.
“The Whole” having consciousness of its own implies Pantheism. Pantheism means that everything is God.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pantheism
Advaita has a related ancient history of Pantheism in Vedanta.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advaita_Vedanta
On 28/05/2022 10:21 am, Dale wrote:
no creation either way
there is only "The Whole" and experience
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Set_theory
here is my logic behind "The Whole" being conscious ...
https://www.dalekelly.org/godhead.html
1) I am conscious.
2) I am part of "The Whole".
3) "The Whole" is part Me.
4) "The Whole" is part conscious.
Pantheism“The Whole” having consciousness of its own implies Pantheism.
means that everything is God.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pantheism
Advaita has a related ancient history of Pantheism in Vedanta.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advaita_Vedanta
Stop wanking, please.
Thank you.
Michael Christ
On Sat, 28 May 2022 18:57:46 +1000, Michael Christ <jesusisthelordofall@hotmail.com> wrote:
On 28/05/2022 10:21 am, Dale wrote:
no creation either way
there is only "The Whole" and experience
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Set_theory
here is my logic behind "The Whole" being conscious ...
https://www.dalekelly.org/godhead.html
1) I am conscious.
2) I am part of "The Whole".
3) "The Whole" is part Me.
4) "The Whole" is part conscious.
PantheismThe Whole having consciousness of its own implies Pantheism.
means that everything is God.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pantheism
Advaita has a related ancient history of Pantheism in Vedanta.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advaita_Vedanta
Stop wanking, please.
LOL! Hey, at least he's trying to figure shit out. He just doesn't
know that's impossible to do.
I too used to regard Descartes's famous observation as undeniably
obvious. Until a Buddhist priest pointed out that the "I" can be
found nowhere in basic perception.
Ted <tedsmasher@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 28 May 2022 18:57:46 +1000, Michael Christ <jesusisthelordofall@hotmail.com> wrote:
On 28/05/2022 10:21 am, Dale wrote:
no creation either way
there is only "The Whole" and experience
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Set_theory
here is my logic behind "The Whole" being conscious ...
https://www.dalekelly.org/godhead.html
1) I am conscious.
2) I am part of "The Whole".
3) "The Whole" is part Me.
4) "The Whole" is part conscious.
Pantheism.The Whole having consciousness of its own implies
doesn'tPantheism
means that everything is God.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pantheism
Advaita has a related ancient history of Pantheism in Vedanta.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advaita_Vedanta
Stop wanking, please.
LOL! Hey, at least he's trying to figure shit out. He just
know that's impossible to do.
I too used to regard Descartes's famous observation as undeniably
obvious. Until a Buddhist priest pointed out that the "I" can be
found nowhere in basic perception.
What does he mean by that?
I can perceive myself.
Does it mean "I" is not universal? But then, nothing is
universal.
Ted <tedsmasher@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 28 May 2022 18:57:46 +1000, Michael Christ
<jesusisthelordofall@hotmail.com> wrote:
On 28/05/2022 10:21 am, Dale wrote:Pantheism
no creation either way
there is only "The Whole" and experience
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Set_theory
here is my logic behind "The Whole" being conscious ...
https://www.dalekelly.org/godhead.html
1) I am conscious.
2) I am part of "The Whole".
3) "The Whole" is part Me.
4) "The Whole" is part conscious.
“The Whole” having consciousness of its own implies Pantheism.
means that everything is God.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pantheism
Advaita has a related ancient history of Pantheism in Vedanta.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advaita_Vedanta
Stop wanking, please.
LOL! Hey, at least he's trying to figure shit out. He just doesn't
know that's impossible to do.
I too used to regard Descartes's famous observation as undeniably
obvious. Until a Buddhist priest pointed out that the "I" can be
found nowhere in basic perception.
What does he mean by that?
I can perceive myself.
Does it mean "I" is not universal? But then, nothing is
universal.
On Sat, 28 May 2022 18:57:46 +1000, Michael Christ <jesusisthelordofall@hotmail.com> wrote:
On 28/05/2022 10:21 am, Dale wrote:Pantheism
no creation either way
there is only "The Whole" and experience
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Set_theory
here is my logic behind "The Whole" being conscious ...
https://www.dalekelly.org/godhead.html
1) I am conscious.
2) I am part of "The Whole".
3) "The Whole" is part Me.
4) "The Whole" is part conscious.
“The Whole” having consciousness of its own implies Pantheism.
means that everything is God.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pantheism
Advaita has a related ancient history of Pantheism in Vedanta.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advaita_Vedanta
Stop wanking, please.
Thank you.
Michael Christ
LOL! Hey, at least he's trying to figure shit out. He just doesn't know that's impossible to do.
I too used to regard Descartes's famous observation as undeniably
obvious. Until a Buddhist priest pointed out that the "I" can be found nowhere in basic perception.
On 29/05/2022 1:04 am, Ted wrote:Pantheism.
On Sat, 28 May 2022 18:57:46 +1000, Michael Christ <jesusisthelordofall@hotmail.com> wrote:
On 28/05/2022 10:21 am, Dale wrote:
no creation either way
there is only "The Whole" and experience
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Set_theory
here is my logic behind "The Whole" being conscious ...
https://www.dalekelly.org/godhead.html
1) I am conscious.
2) I am part of "The Whole".
3) "The Whole" is part Me.
4) "The Whole" is part conscious.
“The Whole” having consciousness of its own implies
Vedanta.Pantheism
means that everything is God.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pantheism
Advaita has a related ancient history of Pantheism in
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advaita_Vedanta
Stop wanking, please.
Thank you.
Michael Christ
doesn't knowLOL! Hey, at least he's trying to figure shit out. He just
that's impossible to do.
His foundation is "I". That is no foundation. All it does isleave him
in an abyss.
foundI too used to regard Descartes's famous observation as undeniably
obvious. Until a Buddhist priest pointed out that the "I" can be
nowhere in basic perception.
Because we are not our own creation.
There is only one Person who can say, "I" - Exo_3:14 And God saidunto
Moses, I AM THAT I AM - and we can only find ourselves within that"I".
Otherwise, there is only an eternal struggle for who we are andwhat we
are. It is only stands to reason that our design is fully known byour
Designer.
Michael Christ
On Sun, 29 May 2022 08:17:23 +1000, Michael Christ <jesusisthelordofall@hotmail.com> wrote:
On 29/05/2022 1:04 am, Ted wrote:Pantheism.
On Sat, 28 May 2022 18:57:46 +1000, Michael Christ ><jesusisthelordofall@hotmail.com> wrote:
On 28/05/2022 10:21 am, Dale wrote:
no creation either way
there is only "The Whole" and experience
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Set_theory
here is my logic behind "The Whole" being conscious ...
https://www.dalekelly.org/godhead.html
1) I am conscious.
2) I am part of "The Whole".
3) "The Whole" is part Me.
4) "The Whole" is part conscious.
“The Whole” having consciousness of its own implies
Vedanta.Pantheism
means that everything is God.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pantheism
Advaita has a related ancient history of Pantheism in
doesn't knowhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advaita_Vedanta
Thank you.Stop wanking, please.
Michael Christ
LOL! Hey, at least he's trying to figure shit out. He just
that's impossible to do.
His foundation is "I". That is no foundation. All it does isleave him
in an abyss.
foundI too used to regard Descartes's famous observation as undeniably >obvious. Until a Buddhist priest pointed out that the "I" can be
nowhere in basic perception.
Because we are not our own creation.
There is only one Person who can say, "I" - Exo_3:14 And God saidunto
Moses, I AM THAT I AM - and we can only find ourselves within that"I".
Otherwise, there is only an eternal struggle for who we are andwhat we
are. It is only stands to reason that our design is fully known byour
Designer.
Michael Christ
Very Christian.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 546 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 170:49:01 |
Calls: | 10,385 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 14,057 |
Messages: | 6,416,559 |