XPost: alt.fan.states.north-dakota, alt.politics.homosexuality, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
XPost: sac.politics, or.politics

https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-politics-and-policy/north-dakota- legislature-close-asking-supreme-court-undo-landmark-gay-rcna196202

BISMARCK, N.D. — North Dakota lawmakers are on the verge of making their
state the first to tell the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn its decade-old ruling that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide.

Similar efforts — which would not have any direct sway with the nation’s
top courts — have been introduced in a handful of states this year. North Dakota’s resolution passed the Republican-led House in February but still requires Senate approval, which is not assured.

“The original Supreme Court ruling in 2015 went totally against the Tenth Amendment, went totally against the North Dakota Constitution and North
Dakota Century Code (state laws),” sponsor Republican Rep. Bill Tveit
said. “Why did I introduce it? Every one of us in this building took an
oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States and the state.”

When the Legislature considers such resolutions, attorney and North Dakota National Guard member Laura Balliet said she wonders why she stays in her
home state. The measure makes her feel unwanted, unwelcome and judged
because of who she is, she said. She married her wife in 2020.

“I don’t know what this resolution does other than to tell people like
myself, my friends and my family that we’re not welcome here, and I’m
angry about that because I want to be welcome here. This is my home,”
Balliet told the Senate panel that heard the measure on Wednesday — one in
a stream of opponents who testified against it.

A push across states
Massachusetts-based MassResistance, which describes itself as an
“international pro-family group” but has been labeled “anti-LGBTQ hate
group” by the LGBTQ advocacy organization GLAAD, is pushing the resolution across the country.

Massachusetts became the first state to recognize same-sex marriage, in
2004. Over the next 11 years, most states began to recognize it through
laws, ballot measures or court decisions before the Supreme Court made it
legal nationwide.

Outside of Idaho and North Dakota, the measures have not progressed far, according to an analysis of legislation collected by the bill-tracking
service Plural.

By contrast, there have been additional protections for same-sex marriage
over the years, including a federal law in 2022. Since 2020, California, Colorado, Hawaii and Nevada have repealed old constitutional amendments
that defined marriage as being allowed only between a man and a woman, and Virginia lawmakers advanced a similar measure this year. It could be on
the ballot there in 2026.

Differing views
The North Dakota measure states that the Legislature “rejects” the 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges decision and urges the U.S. Supreme Court “to
overturn the decision and leave unaddressed the natural definition of
marriage as a union between one man, a biological male, and one woman, a biological female.”

In the court’s 2022 ruling that overturned the constitutional right to an abortion, Justice Clarence Thomas said the court should reconsider its precedents in the marriage decision and other past cases.

Soon after the measure passed the North Dakota House last month, several Republican state reps who voted for it stated they meant to vote no or regretted voting yes.

Republican Rep. Matt Ruby said he wished he had voted against the measure, saying his yes vote was for a different intent he realized wasn’t going to happen. The vote sent a bad message “that your marriage isn’t valid and
you’re not welcome,” Ruby said. He said he supports the right for same-sex couples to be married.

Republican Rep. Dwight Kiefert said he voted for the resolution because of
his Christian faith and that the institution of marriage was established
in the Bible in the Garden of Eden between Adam and Eve.

‘Slap in the face’
The measure is a slap in the face to North Dakotans who are happily
married and invested in their state, said Democratic Sen. Ryan
Braunberger, who is gay and sits on the Senate panel that heard the
resolution. The measure sends a dangerous message as North Dakota wants to
grow its population and expand economically, he said.

“We want to make sure that we bring everybody in the best of the crop, and
that runs the gamut of all sorts of different races, ethnicities, sexual orientations through that,” Braunberger said.

The measure is a declaration, if passed, that lawmakers would want to
define marriage through what is arguably a religious lens, which
dangerously gets close to infringing upon the Establishment Clause of the
U.S. Constitution, said Cody Schuler, advocacy manager for the American
Civil Liberties Union’s North Dakota chapter.

“Marriage defined as ‘one man, one woman’ is a particular religious view.
It is not held by all religions, all societies or by nonreligious people,
and so therefore it is dangerous to be making that kind of statement
because it puts legislators on record as to how they might vote on law, on
a binding law versus this nonbinding resolution,” Schuler said.


--
November 5, 2024 - Congratulations President Donald Trump. We look
forward to America being great again.

The disease known as Kamala Harris has been effectively treated and
eradicated.

We live in a time where intelligent people are being silenced so that
stupid people won't be offended.

Durham Report: The FBI has an integrity problem. It has none.

Thank you for cleaning up the disaster of the 2008-2017 Obama / Biden
fiasco, President Trump.

Under Barack Obama's leadership, the United States of America became the
The World According To Garp. Obama sold out heterosexuals for Hollywood
queer liberal democrat donors.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)