• Re: Trump Gives Public Schools 10-Days to Certify They Have Done Away w

    From Mitchell Holman@21:1/5 to useapen on Fri Apr 4 12:55:18 2025
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sac.politics

    useapen <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote in
    news:XnsB2B724B4FBFBX@135.181.20.170:

    The shrinking Department of Education just issues a notice to state
    leaders across the country reminding them that public schools are
    dependent on federal funds and those funds are dependent on compliance
    with civil rights law, specifically the elimination of DEI programs.

    As a condition for receiving federal money, the Trump administration
    is ordering K-12 schools to certify that they are following federal
    civil rights laws and eliminating diversity, equity and inclusion practices...



    Translation: Please submit proof that your
    teaching staff is all white and all Christian.



    “Federal financial assistance is a privilege, not a right,” Craig
    Trainor, acting assistant secretary for civil rights, said in a
    statement. He said many schools have flouted their legal obligations, “including by using DEI programs to discriminate against one group of Americans to favor another.”

    The notice states the administration's objections to DEI.

    In Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard
    College (“SFFA v. Harvard”), 600 U.S. 181 (2023), the Supreme Court
    held that the race-based affirmative action programs at Harvard and
    the University of North Carolina were illegal because they violated
    the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment (for state
    schools like North Carolina), as well as Title VI (for state and
    private schools that receive federal funding like Harvard). The Court explained that the Equal Protection Clause “represent[s] a
    foundational principle—the absolute equality of all citizens of the
    United States politically and civilly before their own laws.” Id. at
    201 (internal quotation marks omitted). It “‘forbids discrimination by
    the General Government, or by the States, against any citizen because
    of his race.’” Id. at 205 (alterations omitted; quoting Bolling v.
    Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497, 499 (1954)). Put simply, the Equal Protection
    Clause and Title VI prohibit race-based action, with only the
    narrowest of exceptions...

    Given the text of Title VI and the assurances you have already given,
    any violation of Title VI—including the use of Diversity, Equity, &
    Inclusion (“DEI”) programs to advantage one’s race over another—is impermissible. The use of certain DEI practices can violate federal
    law.

    If all of this sounds vaguely familiar, that's because the Trump administration issued a very similar letter back in February.


    The response to that earlier letter was a mixed bag. There were
    reports that some states were scrambling to eliminate mentions of DEI
    while others were flatly refusing to comply. Now it appears the Trump Education Department has decided to give this a second try. States
    have 10 days to certify compliance, which means those that refuse
    could see some major funding cuts.

    The memo included a certification letter that state and local school officials must sign and return to the department within 10 days, even
    as the administration has struggled to define which programs would
    violate its interpretation of civil rights laws...

    Programs aimed at recognizing historical events and contributions and promoting awareness would not violate the law “so long as they do not
    engage in racial exclusion or discrimination,” the department wrote.

    “However, schools must consider whether any school programming
    discourages members of all races from attending, either by excluding
    or discouraging students of a particular race or races, or by creating hostile environments based on race for students who do participate,”
    the Education Department said.

    Federal money is only a fraction of the total money spent on schools
    but it still amounts to billions of dollars per year for some states.
    Cutting those funds would result in severe problems and the need for
    layoffs or closing schools.

    Back in February, some states might have concluded Trump would never
    do anything even if they refused to comply. But after the cuts at
    Columbia and other universities, they may see it differently. In
    short, the states have a lot of reasons to comply with this rather
    than attempt to resist it.

    https://hotair.com/john-s-2/2025/04/03/trump-gives-public-schools-10-da
    ys- to-certify-they-have-done-away-with-dei-n3801424


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)