In article <RsyKP.532043$d51.147003@fx46.iad>,
cap@philhendriie.con says...
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain >> in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful presence is not.
The border is now considered military property. Cross now
and you get no breaks.
On 4/12/25 4:38 PM, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <RsyKP.532043$d51.147003@fx46.iad>,
cap@philhendriie.con says...
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to
remain in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful presence
is not.
The border is now considered military property. Cross now
and you get no breaks.
Rudy also seems to miss the significance of "unlawful"
in "unlawful presence" .........
On 12 Apr 2025, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> posted some news:teKdnYIeZMercWf6nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com:
On 4/12/25 4:38 PM, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <RsyKP.532043$d51.147003@fx46.iad>,
cap@philhendriie.con says...
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to
remain in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful presence
is not.
The border is now considered military property. Cross now
and you get no breaks.
Rudy also seems to miss the significance of "unlawful"
in "unlawful presence" .........
He misses the toilet a lot when he pees too.
On 4/12/25 10:47 PM, awinstead wrote:
On 12 Apr 2025, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> posted some
news:teKdnYIeZMercWf6nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com:
On 4/12/25 4:38 PM, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <RsyKP.532043$d51.147003@fx46.iad>,
cap@philhendriie.con says...
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to
remain in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful presence
is not.
The border is now considered military property. Cross now
and you get no breaks.
Rudy also seems to miss the significance of "unlawful"
in "unlawful presence" .........
He misses the toilet a lot when he pees too.
Well, not SO unusual for males ... but is Rudy
actually 'male', at least anymore ? :-)
Rudy's beloved Mex cartels/invaders
Rudy also seems to miss the significance of "unlawful"
in "unlawful presence" .........
He misses the toilet a lot when he pees too.
Well, not SO unusual for males ... but is Rudy
actually 'male', at least anymore ? 🙂
Rudy's beloved Mex cartels/invaders
I have never expressed support for drug cartels *or* improper entry. I
just oppose the racist demonization of undocumented immigrants, blaming
them both for fictitious problems as well as real problems that they
don't cause.
On 4/13/2025 10:54 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
Rudy also seems to miss the significance of "unlawful"
in "unlawful presence" .........
He misses the toilet a lot when he pees too.
Well, not SO unusual for males ... but is Rudy
actually 'male', at least anymore ? 🙂
Rudy's beloved Mex cartels/invaders
I have never expressed support for drug cartels *or* improper entry. I just >> oppose the racist demonization of undocumented immigrants, blaming them both >> for fictitious problems as well as real problems that they don't cause.
Doublethink Meaning
In George Orwell's "1984," doublethink
On 4/13/2025 10:05 AM, "Dark Brandon," "Lucas McCain," "Hisler," "DFENS," "Jade
Helm," "Duke Mantee," "Jim Crow," "Steve from Colorado", a drunk fucking child
molester and subhuman Nazi filth, vomited:
On 4/13/2025 10:54 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
Rudy also seems to miss the significance of "unlawful"
in "unlawful presence" .........
He misses the toilet a lot when he pees too.
Well, not SO unusual for males ... but is Rudy
actually 'male', at least anymore ? ?
Rudy's beloved Mex cartels/invaders
I have never expressed support for drug cartels *or* improper entry. I just
oppose the racist demonization of undocumented immigrants, blaming them both
for fictitious problems as well as real problems that they don't cause.
Doublethink Meaning
In George Orwell's "1984," doublethink
I engage in no "doublethink," you subhuman Nazi filth (soon to be unalived). While I have never supported improper entry, the immigrants who have done it are
a net plus for the U.S. The U.S. needs immigrants, and we ought to have an extremely more generous immigration system.
Subhuman Nazi filth like you need to be disappeared.
On 4/12/2025 9:12 PM, c186282 wrote:
On 4/12/25 10:47 PM, awinstead wrote:
On 12 Apr 2025, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> posted some
news:teKdnYIeZMercWf6nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com:
On 4/12/25 4:38 PM, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <RsyKP.532043$d51.147003@fx46.iad>,
cap@philhendriie.con says...
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to >>>>> remain in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful presence >>>>> is not.
The border is now considered military property. Cross now
and you get no breaks.
Rudy also seems to miss the significance of "unlawful"
in "unlawful presence" .........
He misses the toilet a lot when he pees too.
Well, not SO unusual for males ... but is Rudy
actually 'male', at least anymore ? :-)
Rudy's beloved Mex cartels/invaders
I have never expressed support for drug cartels *or* improper entry. I just oppose the racist demonization of undocumented immigrants, blaming them both for
fictitious problems as well as real problems that they don't cause.
In article <y%RKP.2203483$_N6e.1534620@fx17.iad>,
rudy@phil.hendrie.con says...
On 4/12/2025 9:12 PM, c186282 wrote:
On 4/12/25 10:47 PM, awinstead wrote:
On 12 Apr 2025, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> posted some
news:teKdnYIeZMercWf6nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com:
On 4/12/25 4:38 PM, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <RsyKP.532043$d51.147003@fx46.iad>,
cap@philhendriie.con says...
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to
remain in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States >>>>>>> https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182 >>>>>>>
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful presence >>>>>>> is not.
The border is now considered military property. Cross now
and you get no breaks.
Rudy also seems to miss the significance of "unlawful"
in "unlawful presence" .........
He misses the toilet a lot when he pees too.
Well, not SO unusual for males ... but is Rudy
actually 'male', at least anymore ? :-)
Rudy's beloved Mex cartels/invaders
I have never expressed support for drug cartels *or* improper entry. I just >> oppose the racist demonization of undocumented immigrants, blaming them both for
fictitious problems as well as real problems that they don't cause.
Improper entry? You do support that you liar.No, I have never supported it. But I recognize that those who do it are a net plus for the U.S. This is not in rational dispute.
I engage in no "doublethink," . . . . While I have never (sic) supported improper entry, the immigrants (sic)
who have done it are a net plus for the U.S. The U.S. needs immigrants,
and we (sic) ought to have an extremely more generous immigration system.
In article <TkSKP.1965876$t84d.500323@fx11.iad>,
rudy@phil.hendrie.con says...
On 4/13/2025 10:05 AM, "Dark Brandon," "Lucas McCain," "Hisler," "DFENS," "Jade
Helm," "Duke Mantee," "Jim Crow," "Steve from Colorado", a drunk fucking child
molester and subhuman Nazi filth, vomited:
On 4/13/2025 10:54 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
Doublethink Meaning
Rudy also seems to miss the significance of "unlawful"
in "unlawful presence" .........
He misses the toilet a lot when he pees too.
Well, not SO unusual for males ... but is Rudy
actually 'male', at least anymore ? ?
Rudy's beloved Mex cartels/invaders
I have never expressed support for drug cartels *or* improper entry. I just
oppose the racist demonization of undocumented immigrants, blaming them both
for fictitious problems as well as real problems that they don't cause. >>>
In George Orwell's "1984," doublethink
I engage in no "doublethink," you subhuman Nazi filth (soon to be unalived). >> While I have never supported improper entry, the immigrants who have done it are
a net plus for the U.S. The U.S. needs immigrants, and we ought to have an >> extremely more generous immigration system.
You support slave labor.
Empty faggot tuff-boi talk.
Subhuman Nazi filth like you need to be disappeared.
Bring it bitch.
On 4/13/2025 10:17 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:Repeating your subhuman Nazi filth bullshit will not make it come true, you subhuman Nazi filth (soon to be unalived).
On 4/13/2025 10:05 AM, "Dark Brandon," "Lucas McCain," "Hisler," "DFENS," "Jade
Helm," "Duke Mantee," "Jim Crow," "Steve from Colorado", a drunk fucking child
molester and subhuman Nazi filth, vomited:
On 4/13/2025 10:54 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
Doublethink Meaning
Rudy also seems to miss the significance of "unlawful"
in "unlawful presence" .........
He misses the toilet a lot when he pees too.
Well, not SO unusual for males ... but is Rudy
actually 'male', at least anymore ? 🙂
Rudy's beloved Mex cartels/invaders
I have never expressed support for drug cartels *or* improper entry. I just
oppose the racist demonization of undocumented immigrants, blaming them both
for fictitious problems as well as real problems that they don't cause. >>>
In George Orwell's "1984," doublethink
I engage in no "doublethink," you subhuman Nazi filth (soon to be unalived). >> While I have never supported improper entry, the immigrants who have done it are
a net plus for the U.S. The U.S. needs immigrants, and we ought to have an >> extremely more generous immigration system.
Subhuman Nazi filth like you need to be disappeared.
Doublethink Meaning
On 4/13/2025 11:17 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:No, you subhuman Nazi filth (soon to be unalived).
While I have never supported improper entry,
Prof. Canoza doth protest too much.
While I have never supported improper entry,
In article <xzSKP.1986908$eNx6.1630596@fx14.iad>, mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...I never said otherwise.
On 4/13/2025 10:28 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <y%RKP.2203483$_N6e.1534620@fx17.iad>,No, I have never supported it. But I recognize that those who do it are a net
rudy@phil.hendrie.con says...
On 4/12/2025 9:12 PM, c186282 wrote:
On 4/12/25 10:47 PM, awinstead wrote:
On 12 Apr 2025, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> posted some
news:teKdnYIeZMercWf6nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com:
On 4/12/25 4:38 PM, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <RsyKP.532043$d51.147003@fx46.iad>,
cap@philhendriie.con says...
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to
remain in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States >>>>>>>>> https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182 >>>>>>>>>
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227 >>>>>>>>>
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful presence >>>>>>>>> is not.
The border is now considered military property. Cross now
and you get no breaks.
Rudy also seems to miss the significance of "unlawful"
in "unlawful presence" .........
He misses the toilet a lot when he pees too.
Well, not SO unusual for males ... but is Rudy
actually 'male', at least anymore ? :-)
Rudy's beloved Mex cartels/invaders
I have never expressed support for drug cartels *or* improper entry. I just
oppose the racist demonization of undocumented immigrants, blaming them both for
fictitious problems as well as real problems that they don't cause.
Improper entry? You do support that you liar.
plus for the U.S. This is not in rational dispute.
So you admit [sic] they break the law.
In article <_ASKP.1986909$eNx6.1760383@fx14.iad>, mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 4/13/2025 10:29 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <TkSKP.1965876$t84d.500323@fx11.iad>,
rudy@phil.hendrie.con says...
On 4/13/2025 10:05 AM, "Dark Brandon," "Lucas McCain," "Hisler," "DFENS," "Jade
Helm," "Duke Mantee," "Jim Crow," "Steve from Colorado", a drunk fucking child
molester and subhuman Nazi filth, vomited:
On 4/13/2025 10:54 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
Doublethink Meaning
Rudy also seems to miss the significance of "unlawful" >>>>>>>>> in "unlawful presence" .........
He misses the toilet a lot when he pees too.
Well, not SO unusual for males ... but is Rudy
actually 'male', at least anymore ? ?
Rudy's beloved Mex cartels/invaders
I have never expressed support for drug cartels *or* improper entry. I just
oppose the racist demonization of undocumented immigrants, blaming them both
for fictitious problems as well as real problems that they don't cause. >>>>>
In George Orwell's "1984," doublethink
I engage in no "doublethink," you subhuman Nazi filth (soon to be unalived).
While I have never supported improper entry, the immigrants who have done it are
a net plus for the U.S. The U.S. needs immigrants, and we ought to have an >>>> extremely more generous immigration system.
You support slave labor.
No. Undocumented immigrants being paid lower wages is not "slave labor." Slaves
aren't paid *any* wages.
I am racist.
More empty faggot tuff-boi talk. You're not tough, and you never were. You *never* could fight, even before you got on the wrong side of 70.
Empty faggot tuff-boi talk.
Subhuman Nazi filth like you need to be disappeared.
Bring it bitch.
Bring it bitch.
In article <oJVKP.98127$W1a6.84111@fx04.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 4/13/2025 12:31 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <xzSKP.1986908$eNx6.1630596@fx14.iad>,I never said otherwise.
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 4/13/2025 10:28 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <y%RKP.2203483$_N6e.1534620@fx17.iad>,No, I have never supported it. But I recognize that those who do it are a net
rudy@phil.hendrie.con says...
On 4/12/2025 9:12 PM, c186282 wrote:
On 4/12/25 10:47 PM, awinstead wrote:
On 12 Apr 2025, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> posted some
news:teKdnYIeZMercWf6nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com:
On 4/12/25 4:38 PM, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <RsyKP.532043$d51.147003@fx46.iad>,
cap@philhendriie.con says...
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to
remain in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227 >>>>>>>>>>>
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful presence >>>>>>>>>>> is not.
The border is now considered military property. Cross now
and you get no breaks.
Rudy also seems to miss the significance of "unlawful" >>>>>>>>> in "unlawful presence" .........
He misses the toilet a lot when he pees too.
Well, not SO unusual for males ... but is Rudy
actually 'male', at least anymore ? :-)
Rudy's beloved Mex cartels/invaders
I have never expressed support for drug cartels *or* improper entry. I just
oppose the racist demonization of undocumented immigrants, blaming them both for
fictitious problems as well as real problems that they don't cause. >>>>>
Improper entry? You do support that you liar.
plus for the U.S. This is not in rational dispute.
So you admit [sic] they break the law.
So they are criminals as soon as they enter.
On 12 Apr 2025, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> posted some news:teKdnYIeZMercWf6nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com:
On 4/12/25 4:38 PM, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <RsyKP.532043$d51.147003@fx46.iad>,
cap@philhendriie.con says...
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to
remain in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful presence
is not.
The border is now considered military property. Cross now
and you get no breaks.
Rudy also seems to miss the significance of "unlawful"
in "unlawful presence" .........
He misses the toilet a lot when he pees too.
Stop sucking off my fellow Nazi, scooter.
On 4/12/2025 9:12 PM, c186282 wrote:
On 4/12/25 10:47 PM, awinstead wrote:
On 12 Apr 2025, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> posted some
news:teKdnYIeZMercWf6nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com:
On 4/12/25 4:38 PM, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <RsyKP.532043$d51.147003@fx46.iad>,
cap@philhendriie.con says...
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable
alien to remain in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United
States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful
presence is not.
The border is now considered military property. Cross now
and you get no breaks.
Rudy also seems to miss the significance of "unlawful"
in "unlawful presence" .........
He misses the toilet a lot when he pees too.
Well, not SO unusual for males ... but is Rudy
actually 'male', at least anymore ? :-)
Rudy's beloved Mex cartels/invaders
I have never expressed support for drug cartels *or* improper entry. I
just oppose the racist demonization of undocumented immigrants,
blaming them both for fictitious problems as well as real problems
that they don't cause.
On 4/13/2025 12:31 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted
another content-free batch of lies:
If we dug Gunner up, would you fight him now?In article <_ASKP.1986909$eNx6.1760383@fx14.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 4/13/2025 10:29 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off
Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking
do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies:
In article <TkSKP.1965876$t84d.500323@fx11.iad>,
rudy@phil.hendrie.con says...
On 4/13/2025 10:05 AM, "Dark Brandon," "Lucas McCain," "Hisler,"
"DFENS," "Jade Helm," "Duke Mantee," "Jim Crow," "Steve from
Colorado", a drunk fucking child molester and subhuman Nazi filth,
vomited:
On 4/13/2025 10:54 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
Rudy also seems to miss the significance of
"unlawful" in "unlawful presence" .........
He misses the toilet a lot when he pees too.
Well, not SO unusual for males ... but is Rudy
actually 'male', at least anymore ? ?
Rudy's beloved Mex cartels/invaders
I have never expressed support for drug cartels *or* improper
entry. I just oppose the racist demonization of undocumented
immigrants, blaming them both for fictitious problems as well as >>>>>>> real problems that they don't cause.
Doublethink Meaning
In George Orwell's "1984," doublethink
I engage in no "doublethink," you subhuman Nazi filth (soon to be
unalived). While I have never supported improper entry, the
immigrants who have done it are a net plus for the U.S. The U.S.
needs immigrants, and we ought to have an extremely more generous
immigration system.
You support slave labor.
No. Undocumented immigrants being paid lower wages is not "slave
labor." Slaves aren't paid *any* wages.
I am racist.
Yes, but that has nothing to do with the fact that no one is being
paid "slave wages."
More empty faggot tuff-boi talk. You're not tough, and you never were.
Empty faggot tuff-boi talk.
Subhuman Nazi filth like you need to be disappeared.
Bring it bitch.
Bring it bitch.
You *never* could fight, even before you got on the wrong side of 70.
On 13 Apr 2025, Michael A Terrell <mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut> posted
some news:oJVKP.98127$W1a6.84111@fx04.iad:
On 4/13/2025 12:31 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,In other words
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted
another content-free batch of lies:
In article <xzSKP.1986908$eNx6.1630596@fx14.iad>,I never said otherwise.
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 4/13/2025 10:28 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off
Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking
do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies:
In article <y%RKP.2203483$_N6e.1534620@fx17.iad>,No, I have never supported it. But I recognize that those who do it
rudy@phil.hendrie.con says...
On 4/12/2025 9:12 PM, c186282 wrote:
On 4/12/25 10:47 PM, awinstead wrote:
On 12 Apr 2025, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> posted some
news:teKdnYIeZMercWf6nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com:
On 4/12/25 4:38 PM, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <RsyKP.532043$d51.147003@fx46.iad>,
cap@philhendriie.con says...
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a >>>>>>>>>>> removable alien to remain in the United
States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. >>>>>>>>>>> United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227 >>>>>>>>>>>
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful >>>>>>>>>>> presence is not.
The border is now considered military property. Cross now
and you get no breaks.
Rudy also seems to miss the significance of "unlawful" >>>>>>>>> in "unlawful presence" .........
He misses the toilet a lot when he pees too.
Well, not SO unusual for males ... but is Rudy
actually 'male', at least anymore ? :-)
Rudy's beloved Mex cartels/invaders
I have never expressed support for drug cartels *or* improper
entry. I just oppose the racist demonization of undocumented
immigrants, blaming them both for fictitious problems as well as
real problems that they don't cause.
Improper entry? You do support that you liar.
are a net plus for the U.S. This is not in rational dispute.
So you admit [sic] they break the law.
just oppose the racist demonization of undocumented immigrants,Rape, murder, theft of private and public property aren't problems?
blaming them both for fictitious problems as well as real problems
that they don't cause.
On 13 Apr 2025, Rudy Canoza <rudy@phil.hendrie.con> posted some news:y%RKP.2203483$_N6e.1534620@fx17.iad:
On 4/12/2025 9:12 PM, c186282 wrote:
On 4/12/25 10:47 PM, awinstead wrote:
On 12 Apr 2025, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> posted some
news:teKdnYIeZMercWf6nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com:
On 4/12/25 4:38 PM, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <RsyKP.532043$d51.147003@fx46.iad>,
cap@philhendriie.con says...
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable >>>>>>> alien to remain in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United
States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful
presence is not.
The border is now considered military property. Cross now
and you get no breaks.
Rudy also seems to miss the significance of "unlawful"
in "unlawful presence" .........
He misses the toilet a lot when he pees too.
Well, not SO unusual for males ... but is Rudy
actually 'male', at least anymore ? :-)
Rudy's beloved Mex cartels/invaders
I have never expressed support for drug cartels *or* improper entry. I
just oppose the racist demonization of undocumented immigrants,
blaming them both for fictitious problems as well as real problems
that they don't cause.
Rape, murder, theft of private and public property aren't problems?
Tariffying <tariffying@usa.org> wrote in news:vtjsa8$o15$4
@toxic.dizum.net:
On 13 Apr 2025, Rudy Canoza <rudy@phil.hendrie.con> posted some news:y%RKP.2203483$_N6e.1534620@fx17.iad:
On 4/12/2025 9:12 PM, c186282 wrote:
On 4/12/25 10:47 PM, awinstead wrote:
On 12 Apr 2025, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> posted some
news:teKdnYIeZMercWf6nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com:
On 4/12/25 4:38 PM, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <RsyKP.532043$d51.147003@fx46.iad>,
cap@philhendriie.con says...
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable >>>>>>> alien to remain in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United
States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful
presence is not.
The border is now considered military property. Cross now
and you get no breaks.
Rudy also seems to miss the significance of "unlawful"
in "unlawful presence" .........
He misses the toilet a lot when he pees too.
Well, not SO unusual for males ... but is Rudy
actually 'male', at least anymore ? :-)
Rudy's beloved Mex cartels/invaders
I have never expressed support for drug cartels *or* improper entry. I
just oppose the racist demonization of undocumented immigrants,
blaming them both for fictitious problems as well as real problems
that they don't cause.
Rape, murder, theft of private and public property aren't problems?
If theft of public property is a
problem why did Trump pardon all the
Jan 6 thieves?
On 13 Apr 2025, Rudy Canoza <rudy@phil.hendrie.con> posted some news:y%RKP.2203483$_N6e.1534620@fx17.iad:
On 4/12/2025 9:12 PM, c186282 wrote:
On 4/12/25 10:47 PM, awinstead wrote:
On 12 Apr 2025, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> posted some
news:teKdnYIeZMercWf6nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com:
On 4/12/25 4:38 PM, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <RsyKP.532043$d51.147003@fx46.iad>,
cap@philhendriie.con says...
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable >>>>>>> alien to remain in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United
States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful
presence is not.
The border is now considered military property. Cross now
and you get no breaks.
Rudy also seems to miss the significance of "unlawful"
in "unlawful presence" .........
He misses the toilet a lot when he pees too.
Well, not SO unusual for males ... but is Rudy
actually 'male', at least anymore ? :-)
Rudy's beloved Mex cartels/invaders
I have never expressed support for drug cartels *or* improper entry. I
just oppose the racist demonization of undocumented immigrants,
blaming them both for fictitious problems as well as real problems
that they don't cause.
Rape, murder, theft of private and public property aren't problems?
On 14/4/25 13:48, Tariffying wrote:
just oppose the racist demonization of undocumented immigrants,Rape, murder, theft of private and public property aren't problems?
blaming them both for fictitious problems as well as real problems
that they don't cause.
idjt is having DoD politely steal private property along the border?
On 13 Apr 2025, Rudy Canoza <rudy@phil.hendrie.con> posted some news:y%RKP.2203483$_N6e.1534620@fx17.iad:
On 4/12/2025 9:12 PM, c186282 wrote:
On 4/12/25 10:47 PM, awinstead wrote:
On 12 Apr 2025, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> posted some
news:teKdnYIeZMercWf6nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com:
On 4/12/25 4:38 PM, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <RsyKP.532043$d51.147003@fx46.iad>,
cap@philhendriie.con says...
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable >>>>>>> alien to remain in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United
States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful
presence is not.
The border is now considered military property. Cross now
and you get no breaks.
Rudy's beloved Mex cartels/invaders
I have never expressed support for drug cartels *or* improper entry. I
just oppose the racist demonization of undocumented immigrants,
blaming them both for fictitious problems as well as real problems
that they don't cause.
Rape, murder, theft of private and public property aren't problems?
On 4/14/2025 1:48 PM, Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly obese convicted child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 13 Apr 2025, Rudy Canoza <rudy@phil.hendrie.con> posted some news:y%RKP.2203483$_N6e.1534620@fx17.iad:
On 4/12/2025 9:12 PM, c186282 wrote:
On 4/12/25 10:47 PM, awinstead wrote:
On 12 Apr 2025, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> posted some
news:teKdnYIeZMercWf6nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com:
On 4/12/25 4:38 PM, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <RsyKP.532043$d51.147003@fx46.iad>,
cap@philhendriie.con says...
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable
alien to remain in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United
States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful
presence is not.
The border is now considered military property. Cross now
and you get no breaks.
No, the border is not "military property."
Rudy's beloved Mex cartels/invaders
I have never expressed support for drug cartels *or* improper entry. I
just oppose the racist demonization of undocumented immigrants,
blaming them both for fictitious problems as well as real problems
that they don't cause.
Rape, murder, theft of private and public property aren't problems?
They don't occur much, Blowjob, you squat-to-piss morbidly obese faggot.
In article <QVuLP.2174865$t84d.1935584@fx11.iad>,
rudy@phil.hendrie.con says...
On 4/14/2025 1:48 PM, Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly obese
convicted child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 13 Apr 2025, Rudy Canoza <rudy@phil.hendrie.con> posted some
news:y%RKP.2203483$_N6e.1534620@fx17.iad:
On 4/12/2025 9:12 PM, c186282 wrote:
On 4/12/25 10:47 PM, awinstead wrote:
On 12 Apr 2025, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> posted some
news:teKdnYIeZMercWf6nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com:
On 4/12/25 4:38 PM, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <RsyKP.532043$d51.147003@fx46.iad>,
cap@philhendriie.con says...
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable >>>>>>>>> alien to remain in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United >>>>>>>>> States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227 >>>>>>>>>
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful
presence is not.
The border is now considered military property. Cross now
and you get no breaks.
No, the border is not "military property."
It's going to be.
They're not freeloaders, as you are. They're hard working.
Rudy's beloved Mex cartels/invaders
I have never expressed support for drug cartels *or* improper entry. I >>>> just oppose the racist demonization of undocumented immigrants,
blaming them both for fictitious problems as well as real problems
that they don't cause.
Rape, murder, theft of private and public property aren't problems?
They don't occur much, Blowjob, you squat-to-piss morbidly obese faggot.
Get rid of the free loaders.
On 4/15/2025 6:02 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
Yes, scooter, you fucking Nazi, he is:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:vtk6lp$2d4l1$3@dont- email.me...
On 14/4/25 13:48, Tariffying wrote:
just oppose the racist demonization of undocumented immigrants,Rape, murder, theft of private and public property aren't problems?
blaming them both for fictitious problems as well as real problems
that they don't cause.
idjt is having DoD politely steal private property along the border?
Is he?
"Trump authorizes military to take control of federal land along US
southern border" https://www.koco.com/article/trump-authorizes-military-to-take-control-federal-land-along-us-southern-border/64464608
On 4/15/2025 6:02 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
Yes, scooter, you fucking Nazi, he is:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:vtk6lp$2d4l1$3@dont- email.me...
On 14/4/25 13:48, Tariffying wrote:
just oppose the racist demonization of undocumented immigrants,Rape, murder, theft of private and public property aren't problems?
blaming them both for fictitious problems as well as real problems
that they don't cause.
idjt is having DoD politely steal private property along the border?
Is he?
"Trump authorizes military to take control of federal land along US
southern border" https://www.koco.com/article/trump-authorizes-military-to-take-control-federal-land-along-us-southern-border/64464608
You lose again, scooter. You lose every time, you Nazi faggot.
On 4/15/2025 10:10 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.@gmail.com> wrote in >> message news:lmvLP.1326379$BrX.217349@fx12.iad...
On 4/15/2025 6:02 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
Yes, scooter, you fucking Nazi, he is:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:vtk6lp$2d4l1$3@dont- email.me...
On 14/4/25 13:48, Tariffying wrote:
idjt is having DoD politely steal private property along the border?just oppose the racist demonization of undocumented immigrants,Rape, murder, theft of private and public property aren't problems? >>>>>
blaming them both for fictitious problems as well as real problems >>>>>>> >that they don't cause.
Is he?
"Trump authorizes military to take control of federal land along US
southern border"
https://www.koco.com/article/trump-authorizes-military-to-take-control-
federal-land-along-us-southern-border/64464608
So.. you're complaining that the military is going to control.... FEDERAL
LAND... ie - public property.
No, scooter. That article proves that the criminal Nazi filth Trump regime
is seizing private property, scooter.
You're beaten again, scooter.
On 4/15/2025 10:13 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.@gmail.com> wrote in >> message news:lmvLP.1326379$BrX.217349@fx12.iad...
On 4/15/2025 6:02 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
Yes, scooter, you fucking Nazi, he is:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:vtk6lp$2d4l1$3@dont- email.me...
On 14/4/25 13:48, Tariffying wrote:
idjt is having DoD politely steal private property along the border?just oppose the racist demonization of undocumented immigrants,Rape, murder, theft of private and public property aren't problems? >>>>>
blaming them both for fictitious problems as well as real problems >>>>>>> >that they don't cause.
Is he?
"Trump authorizes military to take control of federal land along US
southern border"
https://www.koco.com/article/trump-authorizes-military-to-take-control-
federal-land-along-us-southern-border/64464608
<crickets>
You lose again, scooter. You lose every time, you Nazi faggot.
What makes you think that "federal land" is "private property"?
Because so far all you've shown is my question of whether Trump is
"having the DoD politely steal private property along the border" to be
utterly valid
No, scooter, it's utterly pointless, because the criminal Nazi filth Trump regime *is* having the military steal private property.
Yes, scooter, you fucking Nazi, he is:idjt is having DoD politely steal private property along the
border?
Is he?
"Trump authorizes military to take control of federal land along
US southern border"
On 4/15/2025 10:13 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.entf?rben.@gmail.com> wrote in message news:lmvLP.1326379$BrX.217349@fx12.iad...
On 4/15/2025 6:02 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
Yes, scooter, you fucking Nazi, he is:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:vtk6lp$2d4l1$3@dont-
email.me...
On 14/4/25 13:48, Tariffying wrote:
idjt is having DoD politely steal private property along the border?just oppose the racist demonization of undocumented immigrants,Rape, murder, theft of private and public property aren't problems? >>>>
blaming them both for fictitious problems as well as real problems >>>>>> >that they don't cause.
Is he?
"Trump authorizes military to take control of federal land along US southern
border"
https://www.koco.com/article/trump-authorizes-military-to-take-control-
federal-land-along-us-southern-border/64464608
<crickets>
You lose again, scooter. You lose every time, you Nazi faggot.
What makes you think that "federal land" is "private property"?
Because so far all you've shown is my question of whether Trump is "having the
DoD politely steal private property along the border" to be utterly valid
No, scooter, it's utterly pointless, because the criminal Nazi filth Trump regime *is* having the military steal private property.
You lose again, scooter. You lose every time, you Nazi faggot.
In article <sKwLP.185511$Xq5f.150955@fx38.iad>, klaus.schadenfreude.entf?rben.@gmail.com says...
On 4/15/2025 10:13 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.entf?rben.@gmail.com> wrote
in
message news:lmvLP.1326379$BrX.217349@fx12.iad...
On 4/15/2025 6:02 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
Yes, scooter, you fucking Nazi, he is:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:vtk6lp$2d4l1$3@dont-
email.me...
On 14/4/25 13:48, Tariffying wrote:
just oppose the racist demonization of undocumented immigrants,Rape, murder, theft of private and public property aren't problems?
blaming them both for fictitious problems as well as real
problems
that they don't cause.
idjt is having DoD politely steal private property along the border?
Is he?
"Trump authorizes military to take control of federal land along US
southern
border"
https://www.koco.com/article/trump-authorizes-military-to-take-control- >> >> federal-land-along-us-southern-border/64464608
<crickets>
You lose again, scooter. You lose every time, you Nazi faggot.
What makes you think that "federal land" is "private property"?
Because so far all you've shown is my question of whether Trump is
"having the
DoD politely steal private property along the border" to be utterly
valid
No, scooter, it's utterly pointless, because the criminal Nazi filth
Trump
regime *is* having the military steal private property.
You lose again, scooter. You lose every time, you Nazi faggot.
Border property is not private property.
On 15/4/25 8:58, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
Yes, scooter, you fucking Nazi, he is:idjt is having DoD politely steal private property along the
border?
Is he?
"Trump authorizes military to take control of federal land along
US southern border"
Not a lot of federal land along the borders.
Lots of private land along the borders.
In article <sKwLP.185511$Xq5f.150955@fx38.iad>, klaus.schadenfreude.entfï¿?rben.@gmail.com says...A lot of private property abuts the border, and Trump is stealing it.
On 4/15/2025 10:13 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.entf?rben.@gmail.com> wrote in >>> message news:lmvLP.1326379$BrX.217349@fx12.iad...
On 4/15/2025 6:02 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless >>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
Yes, scooter, you fucking Nazi, he is:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:vtk6lp$2d4l1$3@dont-
email.me...
On 14/4/25 13:48, Tariffying wrote:Is he?
idjt is having DoD politely steal private property along the border? >>>>>just oppose the racist demonization of undocumented immigrants, >>>>>>>>> blaming them both for fictitious problems as well as real problems >>>>>>>>> that they don't cause.Rape, murder, theft of private and public property aren't problems? >>>>>>
"Trump authorizes military to take control of federal land along US southern
border"
https://www.koco.com/article/trump-authorizes-military-to-take-control- >>>> federal-land-along-us-southern-border/64464608
<crickets>
No, scooter, it's utterly pointless, because the criminal Nazi filth Trump >> regime *is* having the military steal private property.
You lose again, scooter. You lose every time, you Nazi faggot.
What makes you think that "federal land" is "private property"?
Because so far all you've shown is my question of whether Trump is "having the
DoD politely steal private property along the border" to be utterly valid >>
You lose again, scooter. You lose every time, you Nazi faggot.
Border property is not private property.
In article <JLvLP.1326382$BrX.1087534@fx12.iad>, mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 4/15/2025 9:08 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <QVuLP.2174865$t84d.1935584@fx11.iad>,
rudy@phil.hendrie.con says...
On 4/14/2025 1:48 PM, Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly obese >>>> convicted child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 13 Apr 2025, Rudy Canoza <rudy@phil.hendrie.con> posted some
news:y%RKP.2203483$_N6e.1534620@fx17.iad:
On 4/12/2025 9:12 PM, c186282 wrote:
On 4/12/25 10:47 PM, awinstead wrote:
On 12 Apr 2025, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> posted some
news:teKdnYIeZMercWf6nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com:
On 4/12/25 4:38 PM, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <RsyKP.532043$d51.147003@fx46.iad>,
cap@philhendriie.con says...
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable
alien to remain in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United >>>>>>>>>>> States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227 >>>>>>>>>>>
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful >>>>>>>>>>> presence is not.
The border is now considered military property. Cross now
and you get no breaks.
No, the border is not "military property."
It's going to be.
Cite.
I never give citations.
No one the criminal Nazi filth Trump regime has deported has been proved to be a
They're not freeloaders, as you are. They're hard working.Get rid of the free loaders.
Rudy's beloved Mex cartels/invaders
I have never expressed support for drug cartels *or* improper entry. I >>>>>> just oppose the racist demonization of undocumented immigrants,
blaming them both for fictitious problems as well as real problems >>>>>> that they don't cause.
Rape, murder, theft of private and public property aren't problems?
They don't occur much, Blowjob, you squat-to-piss morbidly obese faggot. >>>
None of those gangsters had real jobs.
Tariffying <tariffying@usa.org> wrote in news:vtjsa8$o15$4
@toxic.dizum.net:
On 13 Apr 2025, Rudy Canoza <rudy@phil.hendrie.con> posted some
news:y%RKP.2203483$_N6e.1534620@fx17.iad:
On 4/12/2025 9:12 PM, c186282 wrote:
On 4/12/25 10:47 PM, awinstead wrote:
On 12 Apr 2025, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> posted some
news:teKdnYIeZMercWf6nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com:
On 4/12/25 4:38 PM, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <RsyKP.532043$d51.147003@fx46.iad>,
cap@philhendriie.con says...
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable >>>>>>>> alien to remain in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United
States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful
presence is not.
The border is now considered military property. Cross now
and you get no breaks.
Rudy also seems to miss the significance of "unlawful"
in "unlawful presence" .........
He misses the toilet a lot when he pees too.
Well, not SO unusual for males ... but is Rudy
actually 'male', at least anymore ? :-)
Rudy's beloved Mex cartels/invaders
I have never expressed support for drug cartels *or* improper entry. I
just oppose the racist demonization of undocumented immigrants,
blaming them both for fictitious problems as well as real problems
that they don't cause.
Rape, murder, theft of private and public property aren't problems?
If theft of public property is a
problem why did Trump pardon all the
Jan 6 thieves?
"Trump authorizes military to take control of federal land along
US southern border"
Not a lot of federal land along the borders.
About 693 miles worth.... or about 30%.. is federal land. Then
when you factor in the land to which the states own, that number
goes up.
Lots of private land along the borders.
That's true as well, the real issue was Rudy's claim that the DOD
is going to be stealing that private property.
Border property is not private property.
and certainly "federal land" is not private property no matter
where it is located.
On 4/15/2025 6:02 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
Yes, scooter, you fucking Nazi, he is:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:vtk6lp$2d4l1$3@dont- email.me...
On 14/4/25 13:48, Tariffying wrote:
just oppose the racist demonization of undocumented immigrants,Rape, murder, theft of private and public property aren't problems?
blaming them both for fictitious problems as well as real
problems that they don't cause.
idjt is having DoD politely steal private property along the border?
Is he?
"Trump authorizes military to take control of federal land along US
southern border" https://www.koco.com/article/trump-authorizes-military-to-take-control- federal-land-along-us-southern-border/64464608
You lose again, scooter. You lose every time, you Nazi faggot.
In article <SXxLP.2402830$_N6e.1618226@fx17.iad>, mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...Abrego Garcia has no gang tattoos. There is no evidence he has any connection to
None of those gangsters had real jobs.No one the criminal Nazi filth Trump regime has deported has been proved to be a
member of a gang.
Tats are as good as an ID card.
On 14 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some news:XnsB2C1D81B9B866629555@185.151.15.160:
Tariffying <tariffying@usa.org> wrote in news:vtjsa8$o15$4
@toxic.dizum.net:
On 13 Apr 2025, Rudy Canoza <rudy@phil.hendrie.con> posted some
news:y%RKP.2203483$_N6e.1534620@fx17.iad:
On 4/12/2025 9:12 PM, c186282 wrote:
On 4/12/25 10:47 PM, awinstead wrote:
On 12 Apr 2025, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> posted some
news:teKdnYIeZMercWf6nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com:
On 4/12/25 4:38 PM, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <RsyKP.532043$d51.147003@fx46.iad>,
cap@philhendriie.con says...
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a
removable alien to remain in the United States. >>>>>>>>>
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United >>>>>>>>> States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful
presence is not.
The border is now considered military property. Cross now
and you get no breaks.
Rudy also seems to miss the significance of "unlawful"
in "unlawful presence" .........
He misses the toilet a lot when he pees too.
Well, not SO unusual for males ... but is Rudy
actually 'male', at least anymore ? :-)
Rudy's beloved Mex cartels/invaders
I have never expressed support for drug cartels *or* improper
entry. I just oppose the racist demonization of undocumented
immigrants, blaming them both for fictitious problems as well as
real problems that they don't cause.
Rape, murder, theft of private and public property aren't problems?
If theft of public property is a
problem why did Trump pardon all the
Jan 6 thieves?
That's a lame response. What, if anything of value was stolen?
On 15/4/25 11:19, Scout wrote:
Border property is not private property.
and certainly "federal land" is not private property no matter
where it is located.
Some farms, being private land, go right up to the border.
On 15/4/25 11:26, Scout wrote:
"Trump authorizes military to take control of federal land along
US southern border"
Not a lot of federal land along the borders.
About 693 miles worth.... or about 30%.. is federal land. Then
when you factor in the land to which the states own, that number
goes up.
and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection
of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings
Lots of private land along the borders.
That's true as well, the real issue was Rudy's claim that the DOD
is going to be stealing that private property.
What do call grabbing a farmer's land?
[Default] Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> typed:
On 15/4/25 11:26, Scout wrote:
"Trump authorizes military to take control of federal land along
US southern border"
Not a lot of federal land along the borders.
About 693 miles worth.... or about 30%.. is federal land. Then
when you factor in the land to which the states own, that number
goes up.
and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the
Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall
be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards,
and other needful Buildings
Lots of private land along the borders.
That's true as well, the real issue was Rudy's claim that the DOD
is going to be stealing that private property.
What do call grabbing a farmer's land?
What "farmer's land" has been "grabbed?"
On 15 Apr 2025, rudy the midget Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.@gmail.com> posted some news:lmvLP.1326379$BrX.217349@fx12.iad:
On 4/15/2025 6:02 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
Yes, scooter, you fucking Nazi, he is:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:vtk6lp$2d4l1$3@dont- email.me...
On 14/4/25 13:48, Tariffying wrote:
just oppose the racist demonization of undocumented immigrants,Rape, murder, theft of private and public property aren't problems?
blaming them both for fictitious problems as well as real
problems that they don't cause.
idjt is having DoD politely steal private property along the border?
Is he?
The DOD doesn't steal.
"Trump authorizes military to take control of federal land along US
southern border"
https://www.koco.com/article/trump-authorizes-military-to-take-control-
federal-land-along-us-southern-border/64464608
You lose again, scooter. You lose every time, you Nazi faggot.
You're a nutjob and you don't know anything about "military control" or
the reasons therefore.
In article <APALP.2664477$TBhc.1562520@fx16.iad>, mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 4/15/2025 1:17 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <SXxLP.2402830$_N6e.1618226@fx17.iad>,Abrego Garcia has no gang tattoos. There is no evidence he has any connection to
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
None of those gangsters had real jobs.No one the criminal Nazi filth Trump regime has deported has been proved to be a
member of a gang.
Tats are as good as an ID card.
MS-13. Trump is lying.
The courts said he was a gang banger.
On 4/16/2025 6:39 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly obese convicted child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 15 Apr 2025, rudy the midget Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.entf?rben.@gmail.com> posted some
news:lmvLP.1326379$BrX.217349@fx12.iad:
On 4/15/2025 6:02 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless >>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
Yes, scooter, you fucking Nazi, he is:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:vtk6lp$2d4l1$3@dont- email.me...
On 14/4/25 13:48, Tariffying wrote:Is he?
idjt is having DoD politely steal private property along the border? >>>>just oppose the racist demonization of undocumented immigrants, >>>>>>> >blaming them both for fictitious problems as well as realRape, murder, theft of private and public property aren't problems? >>>>>
problems that they don't cause.
The DOD doesn't steal.
"Trump authorizes military to take control of federal land along US
southern border"
https://www.koco.com/article/trump-authorizes-military-to-take-control- >>> federal-land-along-us-southern-border/64464608
You lose again, scooter. You lose every time, you Nazi faggot.
You're our intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.
That's right.
Or the fact that "federal land" isn't private property.Trump is ordering the military to take over private property, scooter. This is
settled, you drunken Virginia camper.
In article <2fQLP.700540$SVG3.569628@fx42.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 4/15/2025 3:22 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <APALP.2664477$TBhc.1562520@fx16.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 4/15/2025 1:17 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <SXxLP.2402830$_N6e.1618226@fx17.iad>,Abrego Garcia has no gang tattoos. There is no evidence he has any connection to
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
None of those gangsters had real jobs.No one the criminal Nazi filth Trump regime has deported has been proved to be a
member of a gang.
Tats are as good as an ID card.
MS-13. Trump is lying.
The courts said he was a gang banger.
No, they didn't.
2 courts did.
In article <sQSLP.2071473$eNx6.334319@fx14.iad>, mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 4/16/2025 10:49 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <2fQLP.700540$SVG3.569628@fx42.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 4/15/2025 3:22 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <APALP.2664477$TBhc.1562520@fx16.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 4/15/2025 1:17 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <SXxLP.2402830$_N6e.1618226@fx17.iad>,Abrego Garcia has no gang tattoos. There is no evidence he has any connection to
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
None of those gangsters had real jobs.No one the criminal Nazi filth Trump regime has deported has been proved to be a
member of a gang.
Tats are as good as an ID card.
MS-13. Trump is lying.
The courts said he was a gang banger.
No, they didn't.
2 courts did.
No courts did, which is why you can't identify any such courts or judges, you
fucking dickless jobless dole-scrounging liar.
What happened to the rest of the lies I told?
In article <msQLP.250396$cYP6.183891@fx08.iad>, klaus.schadenfreude.entfï¿?rben.@gmail.com says...No.
On 4/16/2025 6:39 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly obese convicted child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 15 Apr 2025, rudy the midget Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.entfï¿?rben.@gmail.com> posted some
news:lmvLP.1326379$BrX.217349@fx12.iad:
On 4/15/2025 6:02 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless >>>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
Yes, scooter, you fucking Nazi, he is:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:vtk6lp$2d4l1$3@dont- email.me...
On 14/4/25 13:48, Tariffying wrote:Is he?
idjt is having DoD politely steal private property along the border? >>>>>>just oppose the racist demonization of undocumented immigrants, >>>>>>>>>> blaming them both for fictitious problems as well as realRape, murder, theft of private and public property aren't problems? >>>>>>>
problems that they don't cause.
The DOD doesn't steal.
"Trump authorizes military to take control of federal land along US
southern border"
https://www.koco.com/article/trump-authorizes-military-to-take-control- >>>>> federal-land-along-us-southern-border/64464608
You lose again, scooter. You lose every time, you Nazi faggot.
You're our intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.
That's right.
Trump is ordering the military to take over private property, scooter. This is
Or the fact that "federal land" isn't private property.
settled, you drunken Virginia camper.
and the people who own said property are more then happy
to let them have it.
On 4/16/2025 6:39 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly obese convicted child
molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 15 Apr 2025, rudy the midget Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.@gmail.com> posted some
news:lmvLP.1326379$BrX.217349@fx12.iad:
On 4/15/2025 6:02 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless >>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
Yes, scooter, you fucking Nazi, he is:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:vtk6lp$2d4l1$3@dont- email.me...
On 14/4/25 13:48, Tariffying wrote:Is he?
idjt is having DoD politely steal private property along the border? >>>>>just oppose the racist demonization of undocumented immigrants, >>>>>>>> >blaming them both for fictitious problems as well as realRape, murder, theft of private and public property aren't problems? >>>>>>
problems that they don't cause.
The DOD doesn't steal.
"Trump authorizes military to take control of federal land along US
southern border"
https://www.koco.com/article/trump-authorizes-military-to-take-control- >>>> federal-land-along-us-southern-border/64464608
You lose again, scooter. You lose every time, you Nazi faggot.
You're our intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and
physical superior.
That's right.
Trump is ordering the military to take over private property, scooter.
Or the fact that "federal land" isn't private property.
On 4/17/2025 4:54 AM, Scout wrote:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.@gmail.com> wrote in >> message news:msQLP.250396$cYP6.183891@fx08.iad...
On 4/16/2025 6:39 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly obese convicted child
molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 15 Apr 2025, rudy the midget Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.@gmail.com> posted some
news:lmvLP.1326379$BrX.217349@fx12.iad:
On 4/15/2025 6:02 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and
gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
Yes, scooter, you fucking Nazi, he is:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:vtk6lp$2d4l1$3@dont- email.me...
On 14/4/25 13:48, Tariffying wrote:
just oppose the racist demonization of undocumented immigrants, >>>>>>>>>> >blaming them both for fictitious problems as well as real >>>>>>>>>> >problems that they don't cause.Rape, murder, theft of private and public property aren't
problems?
idjt is having DoD politely steal private property along the
border?
Is he?
The DOD doesn't steal.
"Trump authorizes military to take control of federal land along US >>>>>> southern border"
https://www.koco.com/article/trump-authorizes-military-to-take-control- >>>>>> federal-land-along-us-southern-border/64464608
You lose again, scooter. You lose every time, you Nazi faggot.
You're our intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and
physical superior.
That's right.
Trump is ordering the military to take over private property, scooter.
Or the fact that "federal land" isn't private property.
And yet
A scooterism: empty wheeze
On 4/17/2025 8:58 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.@gmail.com> wrote in >> message news:Yf9MP.1922262$2zn8.194255@fx15.iad...
On 4/17/2025 4:54 AM, Scout wrote:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.@gmail.com> wrote >>>> in message news:msQLP.250396$cYP6.183891@fx08.iad...
On 4/16/2025 6:39 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless >>>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:And yet
Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly obese convicted child
molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 15 Apr 2025, rudy the midget Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.@gmail.com> posted some
news:lmvLP.1326379$BrX.217349@fx12.iad:
On 4/15/2025 6:02 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and >>>>>>>> gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied: >>>>>>>>
Yes, scooter, you fucking Nazi, he is:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:vtk6lp$2d4l1$3@dont- email.me...
On 14/4/25 13:48, Tariffying wrote:
just oppose the racist demonization of undocumented immigrants, >>>>>>>>>>>> >blaming them both for fictitious problems as well as real >>>>>>>>>>>> >problems that they don't cause.Rape, murder, theft of private and public property aren't >>>>>>>>>>> problems?
idjt is having DoD politely steal private property along the >>>>>>>>>> border?
Is he?
The DOD doesn't steal.
"Trump authorizes military to take control of federal land along US >>>>>>>> southern border"
https://www.koco.com/article/trump-authorizes-military-to-take-control-
federal-land-along-us-southern-border/64464608
You lose again, scooter. You lose every time, you Nazi faggot.
You're our intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and >>>>>>> physical superior.
That's right.
Trump is ordering the military to take over private property, scooter. >>>>
Or the fact that "federal land" isn't private property.
A scooterism: empty wheeze
A Rudy attempt to change the subject
No, scooter.
On 4/17/2025 8:58 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.entf?rben.@gmail.com> wrote in message news:Yf9MP.1922262$2zn8.194255@fx15.iad...
On 4/17/2025 4:54 AM, Scout wrote:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.entf?rben.@gmail.com> wrote in >>> message news:msQLP.250396$cYP6.183891@fx08.iad...
On 4/16/2025 6:39 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless >>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:And yet
Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly obese convicted child molester
and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 15 Apr 2025, rudy the midget Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.entf?rben.@gmail.com> posted some
news:lmvLP.1326379$BrX.217349@fx12.iad:
On 4/15/2025 6:02 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied: >>>>>>>
Yes, scooter, you fucking Nazi, he is:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:vtk6lp$2d4l1$3@dont- email.me...
On 14/4/25 13:48, Tariffying wrote:
just oppose the racist demonization of undocumented immigrants, >>>>>>>>>>> >blaming them both for fictitious problems as well as real >>>>>>>>>>> >problems that they don't cause.Rape, murder, theft of private and public property aren't problems?
idjt is having DoD politely steal private property along the border?
Is he?
The DOD doesn't steal.
"Trump authorizes military to take control of federal land along US >>>>>>> southern border"
https://www.koco.com/article/trump-authorizes-military-to-take-control-
federal-land-along-us-southern-border/64464608
You lose again, scooter. You lose every time, you Nazi faggot.
You're our intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and >>>>>> physical superior.
That's right.
Trump is ordering the military to take over private property, scooter. >>>
Or the fact that "federal land" isn't private property.
A scooterism: empty wheeze
A Rudy attempt to change the subject
No, scooter. Your scooterisms destroy any possibility of reasoned discourse. You
are a fucking idiot, scooter, and you know it.
It just cracks me up that you fancy yourself to be some kind of Usenet ninja or
jiu-jitsu master. You are the antithesis of that. How many times did you keep trying your failed "gotcha" last October about Biden "confessing" to getting the
Ukrainian prosecutor fired? At least twenty, by my count.
On 4/17/2025 10:22 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.@gmail.com> wrote in >> message news:0R9MP.329866$j2D.106419@fx09.iad...
On 4/17/2025 8:58 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.@gmail.com> wrote >>>> in message news:Yf9MP.1922262$2zn8.194255@fx15.iad...
On 4/17/2025 4:54 AM, Scout wrote:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote in message news:msQLP.250396$cYP6.183891@fx08.iad...
On 4/16/2025 6:39 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and
gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and >>>>>>> lied:
Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly obese convicted child >>>>>>>> molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 15 Apr 2025, rudy the midget Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.@gmail.com> posted some
news:lmvLP.1326379$BrX.217349@fx12.iad:
On 4/15/2025 6:02 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and >>>>>>>>>> gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied: >>>>>>>>>>
Yes, scooter, you fucking Nazi, he is:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:vtk6lp$2d4l1$3@dont- email.me...
On 14/4/25 13:48, Tariffying wrote:
just oppose the racist demonization of undocumented >>>>>>>>>>>>>> immigrants,Rape, murder, theft of private and public property aren't >>>>>>>>>>>>> problems?
blaming them both for fictitious problems as well as real >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >problems that they don't cause.
idjt is having DoD politely steal private property along the >>>>>>>>>>>> border?
Is he?
The DOD doesn't steal.
"Trump authorizes military to take control of federal land along >>>>>>>>>> USYou're our intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and >>>>>>>>> physical superior.
southern border"
https://www.koco.com/article/trump-authorizes-military-to-take-control-
federal-land-along-us-southern-border/64464608
You lose again, scooter. You lose every time, you Nazi faggot. >>>>>>>>>
That's right.
Trump is ordering the military to take over private property,
Or the fact that "federal land" isn't private property.
scooter.
And yet
A scooterism: empty wheeze
A Rudy attempt to change the subject
A Rudy attempt to change the subject
Restore the full text that proves scooter is a clumsy oafish Usenet moron:
No, scooter. Your scooterisms destroy any possibility of reasoned
discourse.
In article <0R9MP.329866$j2D.106419@fx09.iad>, klaus.schadenfreude.entf?rben.@gmail.com says...
On 4/17/2025 8:58 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.entf?rben.@gmail.com> wrote
in
message news:Yf9MP.1922262$2zn8.194255@fx15.iad...
On 4/17/2025 4:54 AM, Scout wrote:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.entf?rben.@gmail.com>
wrote in
message news:msQLP.250396$cYP6.183891@fx08.iad...
On 4/16/2025 6:39 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and
gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly obese convicted child
molester
and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 15 Apr 2025, rudy the midget Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.entf?rben.@gmail.com> posted some
news:lmvLP.1326379$BrX.217349@fx12.iad:
On 4/15/2025 6:02 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and
gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
Yes, scooter, you fucking Nazi, he is:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:vtk6lp$2d4l1$3@dont- email.me...
On 14/4/25 13:48, Tariffying wrote:
just oppose the racist demonization of undocumentedRape, murder, theft of private and public property aren't
immigrants,
blaming them both for fictitious problems as well as real
problems that they don't cause.
problems?
idjt is having DoD politely steal private property along the
border?
Is he?
The DOD doesn't steal.
"Trump authorizes military to take control of federal land along
US
southern border"
https://www.koco.com/article/trump-authorizes-military-to-take-control-
federal-land-along-us-southern-border/64464608
You lose again, scooter. You lose every time, you Nazi faggot.
You're our intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and
physical superior.
That's right.
Trump is ordering the military to take over private property,
Or the fact that "federal land" isn't private property.
scooter.
And yet
A scooterism: empty wheeze
A Rudy attempt to change the subject
No, scooter. Your scooterisms destroy any possibility of reasoned
discourse. You
are a fucking idiot, scooter, and you know it.
An excuse to avoid refute.
It just cracks me up that you fancy yourself to be some kind of Usenet
ninja or
jiu-jitsu master. You are the antithesis of that. How many times did you
keep
trying your failed "gotcha" last October about Biden "confessing" to
getting the
Ukrainian prosecutor fired? At least twenty, by my count.
You still haven't proven that Trumps military is taking
private property.
On 4/17/2025 12:57 PM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Skeeter OG" <invalid@none.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.426b084964a1728f989ea8@usnews.blocknews.net...
In article <0R9MP.329866$j2D.106419@fx09.iad>,
klaus.schadenfreude.entfï¿?rben.@gmail.com says...
On 4/17/2025 8:58 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless >>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.entf?rben.@gmail.com> wrote >>>>> in
message news:Yf9MP.1922262$2zn8.194255@fx15.iad...
On 4/17/2025 4:54 AM, Scout wrote:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.entf?rben.@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote in
message news:msQLP.250396$cYP6.183891@fx08.iad...
On 4/16/2025 6:39 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and >>>>>>>> gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied: >>>>>>>>
Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly obese convicted child >>>>>>>>> molester
and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 15 Apr 2025, rudy the midget Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.entfï¿?rben.@gmail.com> posted some >>>>>>>>>> news:lmvLP.1326379$BrX.217349@fx12.iad:
On 4/15/2025 6:02 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and >>>>>>>>>>> gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied: >>>>>>>>>>>
Yes, scooter, you fucking Nazi, he is:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:vtk6lp$2d4l1$3@dont- email.me...
On 14/4/25 13:48, Tariffying wrote:
just oppose the racist demonization of undocumented >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> immigrants,Rape, murder, theft of private and public property aren't >>>>>>>>>>>>>> problems?
blaming them both for fictitious problems as well as real >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>problems that they don't cause.
idjt is having DoD politely steal private property along the >>>>>>>>>>>>> border?
Is he?
The DOD doesn't steal.
"Trump authorizes military to take control of federal land along >>>>>>>>>>> USYou're our intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and >>>>>>>>>> physical superior.
southern border"
https://www.koco.com/article/trump-authorizes-military-to-take-control-
federal-land-along-us-southern-border/64464608
You lose again, scooter. You lose every time, you Nazi faggot. >>>>>>>>>>
That's right.
Trump is ordering the military to take over private property,
Or the fact that "federal land" isn't private property.
scooter.
And yet
A scooterism: empty wheeze
A Rudy attempt to change the subject
No, scooter. Your scooterisms destroy any possibility of reasoned
discourse. You
are a fucking idiot, scooter, and you know it.
An excuse to avoid refute.
To which Rudy goes *SLURRPPPP*!
I won't stop sucking off guys in the liquor store parking lot.
In <2fQLP.700540$SVG3.569628@fx42.iad> Rudy wrote:
On 4/15/2025 3:22 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <APALP.2664477$TBhc.1562520@fx16.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 4/15/2025 1:17 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <SXxLP.2402830$_N6e.1618226@fx17.iad>,Abrego Garcia has no gang tattoos. There is no evidence he has any connection to
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
None of those gangsters had real jobs.No one the criminal Nazi filth Trump regime has deported has been proved to be a
member of a gang.
Tats are as good as an ID card.
MS-13. Trump is lying.
The courts said he was a gang banger.
No, they didn't.
Yes they
On 5/31/2025 10:52 AM, Brandon Clark wrote:
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain
in the United States.
Crossing the border illegally into the United States is a federal crime. Specifically,
On 02 Jun 2025, Rudy Canoza <rudy@phil.hendrie.con> posted some news:y6l%P.349945$G6Lf.23219@fx17.iad:I read just fine, Blowjob. The courts did not say he is a gang banger, Blowjob, you *fat* stupid cuck.
On 4/16/2025 4:19 PM, spammy, stupid cocksucker, lied:
In <2fQLP.700540$SVG3.569628@fx42.iad> Rudy wrote:
On 4/15/2025 3:22 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off
Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking
do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies:
In article <APALP.2664477$TBhc.1562520@fx16.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 4/15/2025 1:17 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off
Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking
do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies:
In article <SXxLP.2402830$_N6e.1618226@fx17.iad>,Abrego Garcia has no gang tattoos. There is no evidence he has any >>>>>> connection to MS-13. Trump is lying.
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
None of those gangsters had real jobs.No one the criminal Nazi filth Trump regime has deported has
been proved to be a member of a gang.
Tats are as good as an ID card.
The courts said he was a gang banger.
No, they didn't.
Yes they
No, spammy, they did not.
Learn to read!
On 02 Jun 2025, J Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com> posted some news:101knr5$3do59$1@dont-email.me:
On 5/31/2025 1:29 PM, Oven Repair, stupid mewling shitworm,
bullshitted:
On 5/31/2025 10:52 AM, Brandon Clark wrote:
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien
to remain in the United States.
Crossing the border illegally into the United States is a federal
crime. Specifically,
Overstaying a visa is not a crime, you stupid fucktard.
What the OP stated is correct
Blowjob *still* doesn't know what his tell is.
On 6/3/2025 12:38 AM, Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly obese convicted child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 02 Jun 2025, J Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com> posted some
news:101knr5$3do59$1@dont-email.me:
On 5/31/2025 1:29 PM, Oven Repair, stupid mewling shitworm,
bullshitted:
On 5/31/2025 10:52 AM, Brandon Clark wrote:
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien
to remain in the United States.
Crossing the border illegally into the United States is a federal
crime. Specifically,
Overstaying a visa is not a crime, you stupid fucktard.
What the OP stated is correct
I know, Blowjob — I am the OP, and what I stated is correct: unlawful presence is not a crime.
Why do you keep working so hard at being stupid, scooter?
Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
Why do you keep working so hard at being stupid, scooter?
It comes so easy for me!
--
<poster formerly known as Jon Ball>
On 04 Jun 2025, Klaus Schadenfreude <katt@gmail.com> posted some news:8U%%P.10540$cr96.233@fx44.iad:
On 6/4/2025 6:05 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
No dictionaries, scooter. Literate people â€" me, in this thread â€" >> don't need them.
"Clave" <ChrisShitbagious@TheMonastery.com> wrote in message
news:tJL%P.372612$K3w3.134218@fx05.iad...
Blowjob *still* doesn't know what his tell is.
On 6/3/2025 12:38 AM, Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly
obese convicted child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 02 Jun 2025, J Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com> posted some
news:101knr5$3do59$1@dont-email.me:
On 5/31/2025 1:29 PM, Oven Repair, stupid mewling shitworm,
bullshitted:
On 5/31/2025 10:52 AM, Brandon Clark wrote:
 From the Supreme Court:
     As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable
alien to remain     in the United States.
Crossing the border illegally into the United States is a federal >>>>>>> crime. Specifically,
Overstaying a visa is not a crime, you stupid fucktard.
What the OP stated is correct
I know, Blowjob â€" I am the OP, and what I stated is correct:
unlawful presence is not a crime.
What part of "unlawful" do you think means it isn’t a crime?
unlawful
adjective
You're
We've been through this many times already, scooter. *Every* crime in
the U.S.C. specifies a potential period of incarceration if convicted.
The specification of unlawful presence does *not*, scooter.
It says we
Blowjob *still* doesn't know what his tell is. Too funny!
On 6/4/2025 1:52 PM, Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly obese convicted
child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 04 Jun 2025, Klaus Schadenfreude <katt@gmail.com> posted some
news:8U%%P.10540$cr96.233@fx44.iad:
On 6/4/2025 6:05 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
No dictionaries, scooter. Literate people " me, in this thread "
"Clave" <ChrisShitbagious@TheMonastery.com> wrote in message
news:tJL%P.372612$K3w3.134218@fx05.iad...
Blowjob *still* doesn't know what his tell is.
On 6/3/2025 12:38 AM, Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly
obese convicted child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 02 Jun 2025, J Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com> posted some
news:101knr5$3do59$1@dont-email.me:
On 5/31/2025 1:29 PM, Oven Repair, stupid mewling shitworm,
bullshitted:
On 5/31/2025 10:52 AM, Brandon Clark wrote:
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable >>>>>>>>> alien to remain in the United States.
Crossing the border illegally into the United States is a federal >>>>>>>> crime. Specifically,
Overstaying a visa is not a crime, you stupid fucktard.
What the OP stated is correct
I know, Blowjob " I am the OP, and what I stated is correct:
unlawful presence is not a crime.
What part of "unlawful" do you think means it isn’t a crime?
unlawful
adjective
don't need them.
You're
I am scooter's and your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and
physical superior, Blowjob, you *fat* stupid cuck.
We've been through this many times already, scooter. *Every* crime in
the U.S.C. specifies a potential period of incarceration if convicted.
The specification of unlawful presence does *not*, scooter.
It says we
It says you can fuck off and die, Blowjob, you *fat* stupid cuck.
On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 18:36:11 -0700, algorithmic behavior <somefuckingguyyy@gardner.con> in alt.atheism with
message-id <ew60Q.40168$VIE2.3278@fx33.iad> wrote:
Blowjob *still* doesn't know what his tell is. Too funny!
On 6/4/2025 1:52 PM, Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly obese convicted
child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 04 Jun 2025, Klaus Schadenfreude <katt@gmail.com> posted some
news:8U%%P.10540$cr96.233@fx44.iad:
On 6/4/2025 6:05 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
No dictionaries, scooter. Literate people â€" me, in this thread â€" >>>> don't need them.
"Clave" <ChrisShitbagious@TheMonastery.com> wrote in message
news:tJL%P.372612$K3w3.134218@fx05.iad...
Blowjob *still* doesn't know what his tell is.
On 6/3/2025 12:38 AM, Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly >>>>>> obese convicted child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 02 Jun 2025, J Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com> posted some
news:101knr5$3do59$1@dont-email.me:
On 5/31/2025 1:29 PM, Oven Repair, stupid mewling shitworm,
bullshitted:
On 5/31/2025 10:52 AM, Brandon Clark wrote:
 From the Supreme Court:
     As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable
alien to remain     in the United States.
Crossing the border illegally into the United States is a federal >>>>>>>>> crime. Specifically,
Overstaying a visa is not a crime, you stupid fucktard.
What the OP stated is correct
I know, Blowjob â€" I am the OP, and what I stated is correct:
unlawful presence is not a crime.
What part of "unlawful" do you think means it isn’t a crime?
unlawful
adjective
You're
I am scooter's and your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and
physical superior, Blowjob, you *fat* stupid cuck.
We've been through this many times already, scooter. *Every* crime in
the U.S.C. specifies a potential period of incarceration if convicted. >>>> The specification of unlawful presence does *not*, scooter.
It says we
It says you can fuck off and die, Blowjob, you *fat* stupid cuck.
Rudy kicks my rapist ass again.
Attila wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 18:36:11 -0700, algorithmic behaviorrudy couldn't raise corn
<somefuckingguyyy@gardner.con> in alt.atheism with
message-id <ew60Q.40168$VIE2.3278@fx33.iad> wrote:
Blowjob *still* doesn't know what his tell is. Too funny!
On 6/4/2025 1:52 PM, Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly
obese convicted child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 04 Jun 2025, Klaus Schadenfreude <katt@gmail.com> posted some
news:8U%%P.10540$cr96.233@fx44.iad:
On 6/4/2025 6:05 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and
gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled
and lied:
No dictionaries, scooter. Literate people â€" me, in this
"Clave" <ChrisShitbagious@TheMonastery.com> wrote in message
news:tJL%P.372612$K3w3.134218@fx05.iad...
Blowjob *still* doesn't know what his tell is.
On 6/3/2025 12:38 AM, Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" >>>>>>> morbidly obese convicted child molester and lying fat fuck,
lied:
On 02 Jun 2025, J Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com> posted some
news:101knr5$3do59$1@dont-email.me:
On 5/31/2025 1:29 PM, Oven Repair, stupid mewling shitworm,
bullshitted:
On 5/31/2025 10:52 AM, Brandon Clark wrote:
 From the Supreme Court:
     As a general rule, it is not a crime
for a removable alien to remain     in the
United States.
Crossing the border illegally into the United States is a
federal crime. Specifically,
Overstaying a visa is not a crime, you stupid fucktard.
What the OP stated is correct
I know, Blowjob â€" I am the OP, and what I stated is
correct: unlawful presence is not a crime.
What part of "unlawful" do you think means it isn’t a >>>>>> crime?
unlawful
adjective
thread â€" don't need them.
You're
I am scooter's and your intellectual, moral, professional, social,
literary and physical superior, Blowjob, you *fat* stupid cuck.
We've been through this many times already, scooter. *Every* crime
in the U.S.C. specifies a potential period of incarceration if
convicted. The specification of unlawful presence does *not*,
scooter.
It says we
It says you can fuck off and die, Blowjob, you *fat* stupid cuck.
Rudy raises his ugly head again.
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien
to remain
in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful
presence is not.
This is settled.
Royce C. Lamberth wrote:
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain
in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful presence is not. >>
This is settled.
it should not be called unlawful then, unlawful means criminal, right?
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain
in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful presence is not.
This is settled.
On 6/29/2025 1:56 PM, jojo wrote:
Royce C. Lamberth wrote:
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain >>> in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful presence is not. >>>
This is settled.
it should not be called unlawful then, unlawful means criminal, right?
No, that's wrong. Unlawful does *not* always mean criminal. There are myriad >unlawful things that are not criminal. If you make a major addition to your >house for which you did not get a permit, that is unlawful but not criminal. You
may be fined or ordered to remove the addition, but you face no risk of prison >for doing the addition without a permit.
If you slander or libel someone, that is unlawful but not criminal. He may sue >you and win damages, but you cannot be put in prison for it.
If you enter into a contract with another party and then do not abide the terms
of the contract, i.e. breach of contract, you may be sued for damages and/or an
order to perform, but it is not a crime and you cannot go to jail for it.
Every statutory crime specified a potential period of incarceration (jail or >prison). Civil violations (torts, regulatory violations, etc.) do not. If an >alien is found to be unlawfully present, the worst he can suffer is removal >(deportation). He cannot be imprisoned for it.
So, what did you learn today? Criminal equals unlawful, but unlawful does not >always equal criminal.
On 6/29/2025 1:56 PM, jojo wrote:
Royce C. Lamberth wrote:
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable
alien to remain
in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful
presence is not.
This is settled.
it should not be called unlawful then, unlawful means criminal,
right?
No, that's wrong. Unlawful does *not* always mean criminal. There
are myriad unlawful things that are not criminal. If you make a
major addition to your house for which you did not get a permit,
that is unlawful but not criminal. You may be fined or ordered to
remove the addition, but you face no risk of prison for doing the
addition without a permit.
If you slander or libel someone, that is unlawful but not
criminal. He may sue you and win damages, but you cannot be put
in prison for it.
If you enter into a contract with another party and then do not
abide the terms of the contract, i.e. breach of contract, you may
be sued for damages and/or an order to perform, but it is not a
crime and you cannot go to jail for it.
Every statutory crime specified a potential period of
incarceration (jail or prison). Civil violations (torts,
regulatory violations, etc.) do not. If an alien is found to be
unlawfully present, the worst he can suffer is removal
(deportation). He cannot be imprisoned for it.
So, what did you learn today? Criminal equals unlawful, but
unlawful does not always equal criminal.
On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 16:55:12 -0700, "Royce C. Lamberth" <judge@us.district.gob> in alt.atheism with message-id <znk8Q.129902$fzq1.115295@fx10.iad> wrote:
On 6/29/2025 1:56 PM, jojo wrote:
Royce C. Lamberth wrote:
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain
in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful presence is not.
This is settled.
it should not be called unlawful then, unlawful means criminal, right?
No, that's wrong. Unlawful does *not* always mean criminal. There are myriad >> unlawful things that are not criminal. If you make a major addition to your >> house for which you did not get a permit, that is unlawful but not criminal. You
may be fined or ordered to remove the addition, but you face no risk of prison
for doing the addition without a permit.
If you slander or libel someone, that is unlawful but not criminal. He may sue
you and win damages, but you cannot be put in prison for it.
If you enter into a contract with another party and then do not abide the terms
of the contract, i.e. breach of contract, you may be sued for damages and/or an
order to perform, but it is not a crime and you cannot go to jail for it.
Every statutory crime specified a potential period of incarceration (jail or >> prison). Civil violations (torts, regulatory violations, etc.) do not. If an >> alien is found to be unlawfully present, the worst he can suffer is removal >> (deportation). He cannot be imprisoned for it.
So, what did you learn today? Criminal equals unlawful, but unlawful does not
always equal criminal.
In a legal context, a criminal offense is an act that breaks
the law and is prosecuted by the state.
Conviction can lead to various punishments, such as fines,
imprisonment, or other penalties.
It is not necessary to be imprisoned it order to be a
criminal.
Illegal presence is a violation of federal law.
Illegal presence is a violation of federal law.
It isn't.
On 6/30/2025 3:17 AM, Attila wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 16:55:12 -0700, "Royce C. Lamberth"
<judge@us.district.gob> in alt.atheism with message-id
<znk8Q.129902$fzq1.115295@fx10.iad> wrote:
On 6/29/2025 1:56 PM, jojo wrote:
Royce C. Lamberth wrote:
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain
in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful presence is not.
This is settled.
it should not be called unlawful then, unlawful means criminal, right?
No, that's wrong. Unlawful does *not* always mean criminal. There are myriad
unlawful things that are not criminal. If you make a major addition to your >>> house for which you did not get a permit, that is unlawful but not criminal. You
may be fined or ordered to remove the addition, but you face no risk of prison
for doing the addition without a permit.
If you slander or libel someone, that is unlawful but not criminal. He may sue
you and win damages, but you cannot be put in prison for it.
If you enter into a contract with another party and then do not abide the terms
of the contract, i.e. breach of contract, you may be sued for damages and/or an
order to perform, but it is not a crime and you cannot go to jail for it. >>>
Every statutory crime specified a potential period of incarceration (jail or
prison). Civil violations (torts, regulatory violations, etc.) do not. If an
alien is found to be unlawfully present, the worst he can suffer is removal >>> (deportation). He cannot be imprisoned for it.
So, what did you learn today? Criminal equals unlawful, but unlawful does not
always equal criminal.
In a legal context, a criminal offense is an act that breaks
the law and is prosecuted by the state.
It's an act that can lead to incarceration. Unlawful presence cannot.
Conviction can lead to various punishments, such as fines,
imprisonment, or other penalties.
There is no prospect of a criminal trial for unlawful presence.
It is not necessary to be imprisoned it order to be a
criminal.
The potential for incarceration is always there if something is a crime. Every >crime specifies a potential period of incarceration. Unlawful presence does not.
It's not a crime.
Illegal presence is a violation of federal law.
It isn't.
Royce C. Lamberth wrote:All crimes specify a potential period of incarceration. The duration of potential incarceration increases with the severity of the crime. But because unlawful presence is not a crime, there is no potential period of incarceration.
On 6/29/2025 1:56 PM, jojo wrote:
Royce C. Lamberth wrote:
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain
in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful presence is not.
This is settled.
it should not be called unlawful then, unlawful means criminal, right?
No, that's wrong. Unlawful does *not* always mean criminal. There are myriad >> unlawful things that are not criminal. If you make a major addition to your >> house for which you did not get a permit, that is unlawful but not criminal. >> You may be fined or ordered to remove the addition, but you face no risk of >> prison for doing the addition without a permit.
If you slander or libel someone, that is unlawful but not criminal. He may sue
you and win damages, but you cannot be put in prison for it.
If you enter into a contract with another party and then do not abide the
terms of the contract, i.e. breach of contract, you may be sued for damages >> and/or an order to perform, but it is not a crime and you cannot go to jail >> for it.
Every statutory crime specified a potential period of incarceration (jail or >> prison). Civil violations (torts, regulatory violations, etc.) do not. If an >> alien is found to be unlawfully present, the worst he can suffer is removal >> (deportation). He cannot be imprisoned for it.
So, what did you learn today? Criminal equals unlawful, but unlawful does not
always equal criminal.
it should be made simple then, jail is level 1 criminal and no jail is level 2
criminal.
On 6/30/2025 9:43 AM, jojo wrote:
Royce C. Lamberth wrote:All crimes specify a potential period of incarceration. The
On 6/29/2025 1:56 PM, jojo wrote:
Royce C. Lamberth wrote:
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable
alien to remain
in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful
presence is not.
This is settled.
it should not be called unlawful then, unlawful means
criminal, right?
No, that's wrong. Unlawful does *not* always mean criminal.
There are myriad unlawful things that are not criminal. If you
make a major addition to your house for which you did not get
a permit, that is unlawful but not criminal. You may be fined
or ordered to remove the addition, but you face no risk of
prison for doing the addition without a permit.
If you slander or libel someone, that is unlawful but not
criminal. He may sue you and win damages, but you cannot be
put in prison for it.
If you enter into a contract with another party and then do
not abide the terms of the contract, i.e. breach of contract,
you may be sued for damages and/or an order to perform, but it
is not a crime and you cannot go to jail for it.
Every statutory crime specified a potential period of
incarceration (jail or prison). Civil violations (torts,
regulatory violations, etc.) do not. If an alien is found to
be unlawfully present, the worst he can suffer is removal
(deportation). He cannot be imprisoned for it.
So, what did you learn today? Criminal equals unlawful, but
unlawful does not always equal criminal.
it should be made simple then, jail is level 1 criminal and no
jail is level 2 criminal.
duration of potential incarceration increases with the severity
of the crime. But because unlawful presence is not a crime, there
is no potential period of incarceration. Also, because it's not a
crime, the standard of proof is lower. It becomes the
preponderance of evidence rather than beyond a reasonable doubt.
That makes it easier for the government to show that a person is
unlawfully present and thus eligible for removal.
Royce C. Lamberth wrote:But the government may not just stop people at random and ask for papers.
On 6/30/2025 9:43 AM, jojo wrote:
Royce C. Lamberth wrote:All crimes specify a potential period of incarceration. The duration of
On 6/29/2025 1:56 PM, jojo wrote:
Royce C. Lamberth wrote:No, that's wrong. Unlawful does *not* always mean criminal. There are myriad
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain
in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful presence is not.
This is settled.
it should not be called unlawful then, unlawful means criminal, right? >>>>
unlawful things that are not criminal. If you make a major addition to your
house for which you did not get a permit, that is unlawful but not criminal.
You may be fined or ordered to remove the addition, but you face no risk of
prison for doing the addition without a permit.
If you slander or libel someone, that is unlawful but not criminal. He may >>>> sue you and win damages, but you cannot be put in prison for it.
If you enter into a contract with another party and then do not abide the >>>> terms of the contract, i.e. breach of contract, you may be sued for damages
and/or an order to perform, but it is not a crime and you cannot go to jail
for it.
Every statutory crime specified a potential period of incarceration (jail or
prison). Civil violations (torts, regulatory violations, etc.) do not. If an
alien is found to be unlawfully present, the worst he can suffer is removal
(deportation). He cannot be imprisoned for it.
So, what did you learn today? Criminal equals unlawful, but unlawful does >>>> not always equal criminal.
it should be made simple then, jail is level 1 criminal and no jail is level
2 criminal.
potential incarceration increases with the severity of the crime. But because
unlawful presence is not a crime, there is no potential period of
incarceration. Also, because it's not a crime, the standard of proof is lower.
It becomes the preponderance of evidence rather than beyond a reasonable
doubt. That makes it easier for the government to show that a person is
unlawfully present and thus eligible for removal.
i got it, my wording was wrong.
in the case of an immigrant, lack of papers would be pretty straight forward.
On 30 Jun 2025, Attila <prochoice@here.now> posted some news:uso46klg3nvigs7ug831dlu3i2l90ugq8t@4ax.com:Advocating for better treatment of undocumented immigrants is not a crime, Blowjob, you stupid *fat* cocksucker and draft dodger.
On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 16:55:12 -0700, "Royce C. Lamberth"
<judge@us.district.gob> in alt.atheism with message-id
<znk8Q.129902$fzq1.115295@fx10.iad> wrote:
On 6/29/2025 1:56 PM, jojo wrote:
Royce C. Lamberth wrote:
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to >>>>> remain in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful presence
is not.
This is settled.
it should not be called unlawful then, unlawful means criminal,
right?
No, that's wrong. Unlawful does *not* always mean criminal. There are
myriad unlawful things that are not criminal. If you make a major
addition to your house for which you did not get a permit, that is
unlawful but not criminal. You may be fined or ordered to remove the
addition, but you face no risk of prison for doing the addition
without a permit.
If you slander or libel someone, that is unlawful but not criminal. He
may sue you and win damages, but you cannot be put in prison for it.
If you enter into a contract with another party and then do not abide
the terms of the contract, i.e. breach of contract, you may be sued
for damages and/or an order to perform, but it is not a crime and you
cannot go to jail for it.
Every statutory crime specified a potential period of incarceration
(jail or prison). Civil violations (torts, regulatory violations,
etc.) do not. If an alien is found to be unlawfully present, the worst
he can suffer is removal (deportation). He cannot be imprisoned for
it.
So, what did you learn today? Criminal equals unlawful, but unlawful
does not always equal criminal.
In a legal context, a criminal offense is an act that breaks
the law and is prosecuted by the state.
Conviction can lead to various punishments, such as fines,
imprisonment, or other penalties.
It is not necessary to be imprisoned it order to be a
criminal.
Illegal presence is a violation of federal law.
Begin indicting the groups who are involved in illegal immigrant advocacy.
Begin indicting the groups who are involved in illegal immigrant advocacy. There is ample evidence of their deliberate insurrection in the media and
on social media. Church groups should not get a pass, indict them too.
Federal Law (8 U.S.C. § 1324):
Prohibited actions:
This law makes it a crime to knowingly bring, transport, harbor,
encourage, or induce unauthorized aliens to enter or reside in the U.S.
On 30 Jun 2025, Attila <prochoice@here.now> posted some news:8no46kpsuj70mmhh7pb1e4io5poef4i0gk@4ax.com:
On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 13:17:32 -0700, "Royce C. Lamberth"
<judge@us.district.gob> in alt.atheism with message-id
<wbh8Q.602496$sxI1.263017@fx11.iad> wrote:
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to
remain in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful presence is
not.
This is settled.
They are still subject to deportation.
Repeated improper entry
Begin indicting the groups who are involved in illegal immigrant advocacy. There is ample evidence of their deliberate insurrection in the media and
on social media. Church groups should not get a pass, indict them too.
Begin indicting the groups who are involved in illegal immigrant
advocacy.
There is ample evidence of their deliberate insurrection in the media and
on social media. Church groups should not get a pass, indict them too.
Spoken like a true fascist!
A deplorable whacko MAGAt, fully fascist wanker.
I suppose in the not too distant future you'd also be calling for extermination Gulags, mess executions with big beautiful gas chambers
too, eh disgusting subhuman scumbag? You must thrive on human misery!
On 30 Jun 2025, Attila <prochoice@here.now> posted some >news:8no46kpsuj70mmhh7pb1e4io5poef4i0gk@4ax.com:
On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 13:17:32 -0700, "Royce C. Lamberth" >><judge@us.district.gob> in alt.atheism with message-id >><wbh8Q.602496$sxI1.263017@fx11.iad> wrote:
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to
remain in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful presence is >>>not.
This is settled.
They are still subject to deportation.
Repeated improper entry by an alien refers to an individual entering or >attempting to enter the United States illegally multiple times, after
having been previously apprehended for illegal entry or removed from the >country. This is a violation of immigration law, specifically 8 U.S.C. § >1325 for initial improper entry and 8 U.S.C. § 1326 for re-entry after >removal, and can lead to both civil and criminal penalties.
Rudy certainly knows how to pick a loser.
On 30 Jun 2025, Attila <prochoice@here.now> posted some >news:uso46klg3nvigs7ug831dlu3i2l90ugq8t@4ax.com:
On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 16:55:12 -0700, "Royce C. Lamberth" >><judge@us.district.gob> in alt.atheism with message-id >><znk8Q.129902$fzq1.115295@fx10.iad> wrote:
On 6/29/2025 1:56 PM, jojo wrote:
Royce C. Lamberth wrote:
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to >>>>> remain in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful presence
is not.
This is settled.
it should not be called unlawful then, unlawful means criminal,
right?
No, that's wrong. Unlawful does *not* always mean criminal. There are >>>myriad unlawful things that are not criminal. If you make a major >>>addition to your house for which you did not get a permit, that is >>>unlawful but not criminal. You may be fined or ordered to remove the >>>addition, but you face no risk of prison for doing the addition
without a permit.
If you slander or libel someone, that is unlawful but not criminal. He >>>may sue you and win damages, but you cannot be put in prison for it.
If you enter into a contract with another party and then do not abide
the terms of the contract, i.e. breach of contract, you may be sued
for damages and/or an order to perform, but it is not a crime and you >>>cannot go to jail for it.
Every statutory crime specified a potential period of incarceration
(jail or prison). Civil violations (torts, regulatory violations,
etc.) do not. If an alien is found to be unlawfully present, the worst
he can suffer is removal (deportation). He cannot be imprisoned for
it.
So, what did you learn today? Criminal equals unlawful, but unlawful
does not always equal criminal.
In a legal context, a criminal offense is an act that breaks
the law and is prosecuted by the state.
Conviction can lead to various punishments, such as fines,
imprisonment, or other penalties.
It is not necessary to be imprisoned it order to be a
criminal.
Illegal presence is a violation of federal law.
Begin indicting the groups who are involved in illegal immigrant advocacy. >There is ample evidence of their deliberate insurrection in the media and
on social media. Church groups should not get a pass, indict them too.
Federal Law (8 U.S.C. § 1324):
Prohibited actions:
This law makes it a crime to knowingly bring, transport, harbor,
encourage, or induce unauthorized aliens to enter or reside in the U.S.
On 6/30/2025 4:48 PM, jojo wrote:
Royce C. Lamberth wrote:But the government may not just stop people at random and ask for
On 6/30/2025 9:43 AM, jojo wrote:
Royce C. Lamberth wrote:All crimes specify a potential period of incarceration. The
On 6/29/2025 1:56 PM, jojo wrote:
Royce C. Lamberth wrote:
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable
alien to remain
in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful
presence is not.
This is settled.
it should not be called unlawful then, unlawful means
criminal, right?
No, that's wrong. Unlawful does *not* always mean criminal.
There are myriad unlawful things that are not criminal. If
you make a major addition to your house for which you did
not get a permit, that is unlawful but not criminal. You may
be fined or ordered to remove the addition, but you face no
risk of prison for doing the addition without a permit.
If you slander or libel someone, that is unlawful but not
criminal. He may sue you and win damages, but you cannot be
put in prison for it.
If you enter into a contract with another party and then do
not abide the terms of the contract, i.e. breach of
contract, you may be sued for damages and/or an order to
perform, but it is not a crime and you cannot go to jail for
it.
Every statutory crime specified a potential period of
incarceration (jail or prison). Civil violations (torts,
regulatory violations, etc.) do not. If an alien is found to
be unlawfully present, the worst he can suffer is removal
(deportation). He cannot be imprisoned for it.
So, what did you learn today? Criminal equals unlawful, but
unlawful does not always equal criminal.
it should be made simple then, jail is level 1 criminal and
no jail is level 2 criminal.
duration of potential incarceration increases with the
severity of the crime. But because unlawful presence is not a
crime, there is no potential period of incarceration. Also,
because it's not a crime, the standard of proof is lower. It
becomes the preponderance of evidence rather than beyond a
reasonable doubt. That makes it easier for the government to
show that a person is unlawfully present and thus eligible for
removal.
i got it, my wording was wrong.
in the case of an immigrant, lack of papers would be pretty
straight forward.
papers.
Royce C. Lamberth wrote:
Illegal presence is a violation of federal law.
It isn't.
Punishment, prison or fine, requires conviction in an Article 3 court.
Deportation requires a hearing in an immigration court.
The Constitution requires due process in the appropriate court.
As long as due process is observed, that is all I demand.
People cannot be held in custody indefinitely pending due process.
On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 16:50:57 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
Who Can Be Deported?
Any noncitizen of the U.S. can be deported. This includes
lawful permanent residents (LPRs and green card holders),
those with immigrant visas, and undocumented immigrants.
Several factors may subject a person to deportation
proceedings. These factors include the following:
Violation of immigration laws: This includes illegally
entering the U.S., overstaying a visa, or violating the
terms of legal entry.
Criminal activity: A person convicted of certain crimes may
also face deportation. Among these are drug offenses,
trafficking crimes, aggravated felonies, domestic violence,
crimes against the government, and more.
Security and law enforcement: This includes activities that
violate the laws and threaten U.S. national security.
https://www.findlaw.com/immigration/deportation-removal/deportation-basics.html
I agree but I insist that Constitutional law be followed which means
due process per the fourth, fifth, sixth and fourteenth amendments.
Blowjob is too stupid to realize his tell. What a fucking idiot!
On 6/30/2025 5:04 PM, Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly obese convicted child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 30 Jun 2025, Attila <prochoice@here.now> posted someAdvocating for better treatment of undocumented immigrants is not a crime, Blowjob, you stupid *fat* cocksucker and draft dodger.
news:uso46klg3nvigs7ug831dlu3i2l90ugq8t@4ax.com:
On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 16:55:12 -0700, "Royce C. Lamberth"
<judge@us.district.gob> in alt.atheism with message-id
<znk8Q.129902$fzq1.115295@fx10.iad> wrote:
On 6/29/2025 1:56 PM, jojo wrote:
Royce C. Lamberth wrote:
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to >>>>>> remain in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful presence >>>>>> is not.
This is settled.
it should not be called unlawful then, unlawful means criminal,
right?
No, that's wrong. Unlawful does *not* always mean criminal. There are
myriad unlawful things that are not criminal. If you make a major
addition to your house for which you did not get a permit, that is
unlawful but not criminal. You may be fined or ordered to remove the
addition, but you face no risk of prison for doing the addition
without a permit.
If you slander or libel someone, that is unlawful but not criminal. He >>>> may sue you and win damages, but you cannot be put in prison for it.
If you enter into a contract with another party and then do not abide
the terms of the contract, i.e. breach of contract, you may be sued
for damages and/or an order to perform, but it is not a crime and you
cannot go to jail for it.
Every statutory crime specified a potential period of incarceration
(jail or prison). Civil violations (torts, regulatory violations,
etc.) do not. If an alien is found to be unlawfully present, the worst >>>> he can suffer is removal (deportation). He cannot be imprisoned for
it.
So, what did you learn today? Criminal equals unlawful, but unlawful
does not always equal criminal.
In a legal context, a criminal offense is an act that breaks
the law and is prosecuted by the state.
Conviction can lead to various punishments, such as fines,
imprisonment, or other penalties.
It is not necessary to be imprisoned it order to be a
criminal.
Illegal presence is a violation of federal law.
Begin indicting the groups who are involved in illegal immigrant
advocacy.
On 7/1/2025 7:49 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:p9266kpvqkcag6qoh47nckihjk3tkv6udm@4ax.com...
On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 16:50:57 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
Who Can Be Deported?
Any noncitizen of the U.S. can be deported. This includes
lawful permanent residents (LPRs and green card holders),
those with immigrant visas, and undocumented immigrants.
Several factors may subject a person to deportation
proceedings. These factors include the following:
Violation of immigration laws: This includes illegally
entering the U.S., overstaying a visa, or violating the
terms of legal entry.
Criminal activity: A person convicted of certain crimes may
also face deportation. Among these are drug offenses,
trafficking crimes, aggravated felonies, domestic violence,
crimes against the government, and more.
Security and law enforcement: This includes activities that
violate the laws and threaten U.S. national security.
https://www.findlaw.com/immigration/deportation-removal/deportation-basics.html
I agree but I insist that Constitutional law be followed which means
due process per the fourth, fifth, sixth and fourteenth amendments.
Maybe you should read the application sometime.. particularly the text
just above where you would sign.
Also a defendant can always waive due process,
No, scooter. The waiver of any rights is *itself* part of due process, scooter.
On 7/1/2025 7:51 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Derek LeHousse" <kyk.wieber.ass@always.forever> wrote in message
news:_ZF8Q.104334$W5Jb.21839@fx09.iad...
Blowjob is too stupid to realize his tell. What a fucking idiot!
On 6/30/2025 5:04 PM, Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly obese
convicted child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 30 Jun 2025, Attila <prochoice@here.now> posted some
news:uso46klg3nvigs7ug831dlu3i2l90ugq8t@4ax.com:
On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 16:55:12 -0700, "Royce C. Lamberth"
<judge@us.district.gob> in alt.atheism with message-id
<znk8Q.129902$fzq1.115295@fx10.iad> wrote:
On 6/29/2025 1:56 PM, jojo wrote:
Royce C. Lamberth wrote:
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to >>>>>>>> remain in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful presence >>>>>>>> is not.
This is settled.
it should not be called unlawful then, unlawful means criminal,
right?
No, that's wrong. Unlawful does *not* always mean criminal. There are >>>>>> myriad unlawful things that are not criminal. If you make a major
addition to your house for which you did not get a permit, that is >>>>>> unlawful but not criminal. You may be fined or ordered to remove the >>>>>> addition, but you face no risk of prison for doing the addition
without a permit.
If you slander or libel someone, that is unlawful but not criminal. >>>>>> He
may sue you and win damages, but you cannot be put in prison for it. >>>>>>
If you enter into a contract with another party and then do not abide >>>>>> the terms of the contract, i.e. breach of contract, you may be sued >>>>>> for damages and/or an order to perform, but it is not a crime and you >>>>>> cannot go to jail for it.
Every statutory crime specified a potential period of incarceration >>>>>> (jail or prison). Civil violations (torts, regulatory violations,
etc.) do not. If an alien is found to be unlawfully present, the
worst
he can suffer is removal (deportation). He cannot be imprisoned for >>>>>> it.
So, what did you learn today? Criminal equals unlawful, but unlawful >>>>>> does not always equal criminal.
In a legal context, a criminal offense is an act that breaks
the law and is prosecuted by the state.
Conviction can lead to various punishments, such as fines,
imprisonment, or other penalties.
It is not necessary to be imprisoned it order to be a
criminal.
Illegal presence is a violation of federal law.
No, it is not.
Begin indicting the groups who are involved in illegal immigrant
advocacy.
Advocating for better treatment of undocumented immigrants is not a
crime, Blowjob, you stupid *fat* cocksucker and draft dodger.
Quite right, they could be cared for while being deported.
non sequitur
Oh, and you might want to check on exactly what conditions a prisoner isYou don't know what you're bullshitting about, scooter — again.
allowed to be held in.. it's much less than you might think.
You evaded the point again, scooter. Blowjob stupidly wrote "Begin
indicting the groups who are involved in illegal immigrant advocacy." Advocacy for humane treatment is not a crime, scooter, so no indictments
are possible — at least not until Trump completely shreds the
Constitution.
On 7/1/2025 9:33 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
Treatment is one thing.. supporting illegal activity is another.You're still whiffing off, scooter. Advocacy on behalf of undocumented immigrants, be it advocacy in court or advocacy in the media or
peaceful public protests, is not a crime,
On 01 Jul 2025, Klaus Schadenfreude <kuatt@gmail.com> posted some news:1GU8Q.19998$Z6Oc.17413@fx41.iad:
On 7/1/2025 9:33 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
Treatment is one thing.. supporting illegal activity is another.You're still whiffing off, scooter. Advocacy on behalf of undocumented
immigrants, be it advocacy in court or advocacy in the media or
peaceful public protests, is not a crime,
In some cases it certainly is.
You might want to take a closer look at that to see where the lines are drawn.
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain
in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful presence is
not.
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful presence is
not.
However, almost everything you have to do to survive here.. IS a crime.
On 7/7/2025 11:23 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
Further generally the only people to which unlawful presence would apply
are those with an expired visa... which amounts to a very small
percentage of the total of illegal aliens.
That's false, scooter. For many years, scooter, visa overstays have been
the *majority* of those who are unlawfully present. It may or may not
still be the case, but for certain it once was the case, scooter.
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2021/04/13/key-facts-about-the-changing-u-s-unauthorized-immigrant-population/
On 7/8/2025 5:58 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless >chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klyvatt@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:_CUaQ.667542$zOOb.170993@fx16.iad...
On 7/7/2025 11:23 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
Further generally the only people to which unlawful presence would apply are
those with an expired visa... which amounts to a very small percentage of the
total of illegal aliens.
That's false, scooter. For many years, scooter, visa overstays have been the
*majority* of those who are unlawfully present. It may or may not still be the
case, but for certain it once was the case, scooter.
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2021/04/13/key-facts-about-the-
changing-u-s-unauthorized-immigrant-population/
Written before Biden decided to open the borders and allow anyone to enter
Biden never did that, scooter. That's just a Republiscum/QAnon lie and fairy tale.
On Tue, 8 Jul 2025 07:00:54 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
<kuvatt@gmail.com> in alt.atheism with message-id <qw9bQ.803575$9SBb.501353@fx18.iad> wrote:
On 7/8/2025 5:58 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
Biden never did that, scooter. That's just a Republiscum/QAnon lie and fairy tale.
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klyvatt@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:_CUaQ.667542$zOOb.170993@fx16.iad...
On 7/7/2025 11:23 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless >>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
Further generally the only people to which unlawful presence would apply are
those with an expired visa... which amounts to a very small percentage of the
total of illegal aliens.
That's false, scooter. For many years, scooter, visa overstays have been the
*majority* of those who are unlawfully present. It may or may not still be the
case, but for certain it once was the case, scooter.
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2021/04/13/key-facts-about-the- >>>> changing-u-s-unauthorized-immigrant-population/
Written before Biden decided to open the borders and allow anyone to enter >>
It's a fact
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain
in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful presence is not.
This is settled.
On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 08:44:45 -0700, "Royce C. Lamberth" <judge@us.district.gob> in alt.atheism with message-id <NHudQ.1335891$zOOb.482958@fx16.iad> wrote:
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain
in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful presence is not. >>
This is settled.
The U.S. Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”) sets forth
numerous grounds for the deportation (“removal”) of
non-citizens.
On 7/15/2025 1:47 PM, Attila the Nazi rapist lied:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 08:44:45 -0700, "Royce C. Lamberth"
<judge@us.district.gob> in alt.atheism with message-id
<NHudQ.1335891$zOOb.482958@fx16.iad> wrote:
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain >>> in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful presence is not. >>>
This is settled.
The U.S. Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) sets forth
numerous grounds for the deportation (removal) of
non-citizens.
That's not the topic. The topic is, is unlawful presence in the U.S. a crime, >and the unambiguous answer is "No", it is not.
On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 13:59:57 -0700, "Royce C. Lamberth" <judge@us.district.gob> in alt.atheism with message-id <hjzdQ.424388$pIB8.311368@fx05.iad> wrote:
On 7/15/2025 1:47 PM, Attila the Nazi rapist lied:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 08:44:45 -0700, "Royce C. Lamberth"
<judge@us.district.gob> in alt.atheism with message-id
<NHudQ.1335891$zOOb.482958@fx16.iad> wrote:
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain >>>> in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful presence is not.
This is settled.
The U.S. Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”) sets forth
numerous grounds for the deportation (“removal”) of
non-citizens.
That's not the topic. The topic is, is unlawful presence in the U.S. a crime,
and the unambiguous answer is "No", it is not.
No, but
On 7/15/2025 5:27 PM, Attila wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 13:59:57 -0700, "Royce C. Lamberth"
<judge@us.district.gob> in alt.atheism with message-id
<hjzdQ.424388$pIB8.311368@fx05.iad> wrote:
On 7/15/2025 1:47 PM, Attila the Nazi rapist lied:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 08:44:45 -0700, "Royce C. Lamberth"
<judge@us.district.gob> in alt.atheism with message-id
<NHudQ.1335891$zOOb.482958@fx16.iad> wrote:
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain
in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful presence is not.
This is settled.
The U.S. Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) sets forth
numerous grounds for the deportation (removal) of
non-citizens.
That's not the topic. The topic is, is unlawful presence in the U.S. a crime,
and the unambiguous answer is "No", it is not.
No, but
Then the topic is closed.
On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 18:19:08 -0700, "Royce C. Lamberth" <judge@us.district.gob> in alt.atheism with message-id <h6DdQ.1395812$sxI1.599860@fx11.iad> wrote:
On 7/15/2025 5:27 PM, Attila the Nazi rapist lied:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 13:59:57 -0700, "Royce C. Lamberth"
<judge@us.district.gob> in alt.atheism with message-id
<hjzdQ.424388$pIB8.311368@fx05.iad> wrote:
On 7/15/2025 1:47 PM, Attila the Nazi rapist lied:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 08:44:45 -0700, "Royce C. Lamberth"
<judge@us.district.gob> in alt.atheism with message-id
<NHudQ.1335891$zOOb.482958@fx16.iad> wrote:
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain
in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful presence is not.
This is settled.
The U.S. Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”) sets forth
numerous grounds for the deportation (“removal”) of
non-citizens.
That's not the topic. The topic is, is unlawful presence in the U.S. a crime,
and the unambiguous answer is "No", it is not.
No, but
Then the topic is closed.
More Rudy kicking my disabled geriatric Alzheimer's husk ass.
On 7/16/2025 3:41 AM, Attila the Nazi rapist lied:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 18:19:08 -0700, "Royce C. Lamberth"
<judge@us.district.gob> in alt.atheism with message-id
<h6DdQ.1395812$sxI1.599860@fx11.iad> wrote:
On 7/15/2025 5:27 PM, Attila the Nazi rapist lied:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 13:59:57 -0700, "Royce C. Lamberth"
<judge@us.district.gob> in alt.atheism with message-id
<hjzdQ.424388$pIB8.311368@fx05.iad> wrote:
On 7/15/2025 1:47 PM, Attila the Nazi rapist lied:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 08:44:45 -0700, "Royce C. Lamberth"
<judge@us.district.gob> in alt.atheism with message-id
<NHudQ.1335891$zOOb.482958@fx16.iad> wrote:
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain
in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful presence is not.
This is settled.
The U.S. Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) sets forth
numerous grounds for the deportation (removal) of
non-citizens.
That's not the topic. The topic is, is unlawful presence in the U.S. a crime,
and the unambiguous answer is "No", it is not.
No, but
Then the topic is closed.
More Rudy kicking my disabled geriatric Alzheimer's husk ass.
Yes.
On Wed, 16 Jul 2025 06:49:14 -0700, "Royce C. Lamberth" <judge@us.district.gob> in alt.atheism with message-id <u5OdQ.226154$VAB9.59103@fx33.iad> wrote:
On 7/16/2025 3:41 AM, Attila the Nazi rapist lied:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 18:19:08 -0700, "Royce C. Lamberth"
<judge@us.district.gob> in alt.atheism with message-id
<h6DdQ.1395812$sxI1.599860@fx11.iad> wrote:
On 7/15/2025 5:27 PM, Attila the Nazi rapist lied:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 13:59:57 -0700, "Royce C. Lamberth"
<judge@us.district.gob> in alt.atheism with message-id
<hjzdQ.424388$pIB8.311368@fx05.iad> wrote:
On 7/15/2025 1:47 PM, Attila the Nazi rapist lied:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 08:44:45 -0700, "Royce C. Lamberth"
<judge@us.district.gob> in alt.atheism with message-id
<NHudQ.1335891$zOOb.482958@fx16.iad> wrote:
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain
in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States >>>>>>>> https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful presence is not.
This is settled.
The U.S. Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”) sets forth
numerous grounds for the deportation (“removal”) of
non-citizens.
That's not the topic. The topic is, is unlawful presence in the U.S. a crime,
and the unambiguous answer is "No", it is not.
No, but
Then the topic is closed.
More Rudy kicking my disabled geriatric Alzheimer's husk ass.
Yes.
More Rudy kicking my disabled geriatric Alzheimer's husk ass.
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain
in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful presence is not.
This is settled.
On Sun, 20 Jul 2025 18:19:42 -0700
"Royce C. Lamberth" <judge@us.district.gob> wrote:
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain >> in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful presence is not. >>
This is settled.
Oh, so that's why Donald Trump isn't deporting his wife.
On Sun, 20 Jul 2025 18:19:42 -0700
"Royce C. Lamberth" <judge@us.district.gob> wrote:
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain
in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful presence is not. >>
This is settled.
Oh, so that's why Donald Trump isn't deporting his wife.
On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 05:29:41 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jul 2025 14:35:34 -0700, Randolf Richardson ??? >><randolf@canadianatheists.ca> in alt.atheism with message-id >><20250721143534.8283a9f6154902ac73f81d45@canadianatheists.ca>
wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jul 2025 18:19:42 -0700
"Royce C. Lamberth" <judge@us.district.gob> wrote:
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain >>>> in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful presence is not.
This is settled.
Oh, so that's why Donald Trump isn't deporting his wife.
In 1996, Mrs. Trump moved to New York, and 10 years later,
she proudly became a United States Citizen, making her the
only First Lady to become a naturalized citizen
How much time did she spend illegally working in the US before then?
On 2025-07-22, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 05:29:41 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jul 2025 14:35:34 -0700, Randolf Richardson ???
<randolf@canadianatheists.ca> in alt.atheism with message-id
<20250721143534.8283a9f6154902ac73f81d45@canadianatheists.ca>
wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jul 2025 18:19:42 -0700
"Royce C. Lamberth" <judge@us.district.gob> wrote:
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain
in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful presence is not.
This is settled.
Oh, so that's why Donald Trump isn't deporting his wife.
In 1996, Mrs. Trump moved to New York, and 10 years later,
she proudly became a United States Citizen, making her the
only First Lady to become a naturalized citizen
How much time did she spend illegally working in the US before then?
You libbys are really stretching to attack Trump.
Melania came to US on a tourist visa.
She later obtained an H-1B visa which allowed her to work.
then she obtained an EB-1 visa, you might want to look that one up,
but the E stands for Einstein.
On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 21:55:04 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
Melania came to US on a tourist visa.
She later obtained an H-1B visa which allowed her to work.
then she obtained an EB-1 visa, you might want to look that one up,
but the E stands for Einstein.
It helps to have powerful connections.
I dispute your claim that she was doing porn on an H-1B.
On 2025-07-22, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 05:29:41 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jul 2025 14:35:34 -0700, Randolf Richardson ??? >>><randolf@canadianatheists.ca> in alt.atheism with message-id >>><20250721143534.8283a9f6154902ac73f81d45@canadianatheists.ca>
wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jul 2025 18:19:42 -0700
"Royce C. Lamberth" <judge@us.district.gob> wrote:
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain >>>>> in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful presence is not.
This is settled.
Oh, so that's why Donald Trump isn't deporting his wife.
In 1996, Mrs. Trump moved to New York, and 10 years later,
she proudly became a United States Citizen, making her the
only First Lady to become a naturalized citizen
How much time did she spend illegally working in the US before then?
You libbys are really stretching to attack Trump.
Melania came to US on a tourist visa.
She later obtained an H-1B visa which allowed her to work.
then she obtained an EB-1 visa, you might want to look that one up,
but the E stands for Einstein.
And who, but you demons care?
Aren't you too busy defending Kilmar Abrego Garcia?
Wife beater.
Illegal migrant transporter.
MS-13 member.
Even his wife claims he abused her.
Why do you demons defend bad eggs like this one?
Governor Swill wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 21:55:04 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
Melania came to US on a tourist visa.
She later obtained an H-1B visa which allowed her to work.
then she obtained an EB-1 visa, you might want to look that one up,
but the E stands for Einstein.
It helps to have powerful connections.
I dispute your claim that she was doing porn on an H-1B.
Some nude studies which according to fake goober christians are nation >rotting pron.
On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 21:55:04 -0000 (UTC), pothead
<pothead@snakebite.com> in alt.atheism with message-id ><105p1bn$kd7h$5@dont-email.me> wrote:
On 2025-07-22, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 05:29:41 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jul 2025 14:35:34 -0700, Randolf Richardson ??? >>>><randolf@canadianatheists.ca> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>><20250721143534.8283a9f6154902ac73f81d45@canadianatheists.ca>
wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jul 2025 18:19:42 -0700
"Royce C. Lamberth" <judge@us.district.gob> wrote:
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain
in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful presence is not.
This is settled.
Oh, so that's why Donald Trump isn't deporting his wife.
In 1996, Mrs. Trump moved to New York, and 10 years later,
she proudly became a United States Citizen, making her the
only First Lady to become a naturalized citizen
How much time did she spend illegally working in the US before then?
You libbys are really stretching to attack Trump.
Melania came to US on a tourist visa.
She later obtained an H-1B visa which allowed her to work.
then she obtained an EB-1 visa, you might want to look that one up,
but the E stands for Einstein.
And who, but you demons care?
Why would he assume she spent any time here illegally?
On 2025-07-23, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 21:55:04 -0000 (UTC), pothead
<pothead@snakebite.com> in alt.atheism with message-id >><105p1bn$kd7h$5@dont-email.me> wrote:
On 2025-07-22, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 05:29:41 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>
On Mon, 21 Jul 2025 14:35:34 -0700, Randolf Richardson ??? >>>>><randolf@canadianatheists.ca> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>>><20250721143534.8283a9f6154902ac73f81d45@canadianatheists.ca>
wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jul 2025 18:19:42 -0700
"Royce C. Lamberth" <judge@us.district.gob> wrote:
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain
in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful presence is not.
This is settled.
Oh, so that's why Donald Trump isn't deporting his wife.
In 1996, Mrs. Trump moved to New York, and 10 years later,
she proudly became a United States Citizen, making her the
only First Lady to become a naturalized citizen
How much time did she spend illegally working in the US before then?
You libbys are really stretching to attack Trump.
Melania came to US on a tourist visa.
She later obtained an H-1B visa which allowed her to work.
then she obtained an EB-1 visa, you might want to look that one up,
but the E stands for Einstein.
And who, but you demons care?
Why would he assume she spent any time here illegally?
Because it's the best the demons can come up with.
They have no platform.
They have no leadership.
They are fragmented, severely.
They currently have a very small war chest as donors are fleeing
the party due to the unpopularity of social policies.
So they attack Melania.
She's a smart, strong lady and I'm sure she can handle the attacks.
On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 19:47:40 -0400, Governor Swill wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 21:55:04 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
Melania came to US on a tourist visa.
She later obtained an H-1B visa which allowed her to work.
then she obtained an EB-1 visa, you might want to look that one up,
but the E stands for Einstein.
It helps to have powerful connections.
I dispute your claim that she was doing porn on an H-1B.
Prove it.
Well, pothead? Did she get her H-1B *before* she started doing porn?
For that matter, did she get her H-1B before she entered the country?
Waiting for your response.
On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 21:55:04 -0000 (UTC), pothead
<pothead@snakebite.com> in alt.atheism with message-id <105p1bn$kd7h$5@dont-email.me> wrote:
On 2025-07-22, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 05:29:41 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jul 2025 14:35:34 -0700, Randolf Richardson ???
<randolf@canadianatheists.ca> in alt.atheism with message-id
<20250721143534.8283a9f6154902ac73f81d45@canadianatheists.ca>
wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jul 2025 18:19:42 -0700
"Royce C. Lamberth" <judge@us.district.gob> wrote:
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain
in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful presence is not.
This is settled.
Oh, so that's why Donald Trump isn't deporting his wife.
In 1996, Mrs. Trump moved to New York, and 10 years later,
she proudly became a United States Citizen, making her the
only First Lady to become a naturalized citizen
How much time did she spend illegally working in the US before then?
You libbys are really stretching to attack Trump.
Melania came to US on a tourist visa.
She later obtained an H-1B visa which allowed her to work.
then she obtained an EB-1 visa, you might want to look that one up,
but the E stands for Einstein.
And who, but you demons care?
Why would he assume she spent any time here illegally?
the party due to the unpopularity of social policies.
So they attack Melania.
She's a smart, strong lady
On 7/23/2025 3:24 AM, Attila, racist Nazi rapist and liar, lied:
On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 21:55:04 -0000 (UTC), pothead
<pothead@snakebite.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
<105p1bn$kd7h$5@dont-email.me> wrote:
On 2025-07-22, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 05:29:41 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>
On Mon, 21 Jul 2025 14:35:34 -0700, Randolf Richardson ???
<randolf@canadianatheists.ca> in alt.atheism with message-id
<20250721143534.8283a9f6154902ac73f81d45@canadianatheists.ca>
wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jul 2025 18:19:42 -0700
"Royce C. Lamberth" <judge@us.district.gob> wrote:
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain
in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful presence is not.
This is settled.
Oh, so that's why Donald Trump isn't deporting his wife.
In 1996, Mrs. Trump moved to New York, and 10 years later,
she proudly became a United States Citizen, making her the
only First Lady to become a naturalized citizen
How much time did she spend illegally working in the US before then?
You libbys are really stretching to attack Trump.
Melania came to US on a tourist visa.
She later obtained an H-1B visa which allowed her to work.
then she obtained an EB-1 visa, you might want to look that one up,
but the E stands for Einstein.
And who, but you demons care?
Why would he assume she spent any time here illegally?
She worked illegally, you stupid fuck. She worked as a model in NYC in the 1990s
when she was here on a tourist visa. And fuck off with this "EB-1" visa >bullshit. She got that based on Trumpy's connections, not any "extraordinary" >ability she had.
On 2025-07-24, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 19:47:40 -0400, Governor Swill wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 21:55:04 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
Melania came to US on a tourist visa.
She later obtained an H-1B visa which allowed her to work.
then she obtained an EB-1 visa, you might want to look that one up,
but the E stands for Einstein.
It helps to have powerful connections.
I dispute your claim that she was doing porn on an H-1B.
Prove it.
Well, pothead? Did she get her H-1B *before* she started doing porn?
For that matter, did she get her H-1B before she entered the country?
Waiting for your response.
<https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/11/04/melania-trump-undocumented-work/93321114/>
She had 10 modeling jobs and earned $20k
Big deal
You demons are really sinking low these days.
Isn't it about time for a Jan 6th post?
Maybe a "prices reduced on day one" post?
While you are thinking about those, here is what Trump has managed to accomplish in 6 months.
Read it and weep.
<https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/2025/07/president-trump-has-kept-his-promises-and-then-some/>
On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 20:29:55 -0700, "Delma T. Ivey" <somewhere@thegreatbeyond.con> in alt.atheism with
message-id <TMhgQ.59373$QtA1.2093@fx16.iad> wrote:
On 7/23/2025 3:24 AM, Attila, racist Nazi rapist and liar, lied:
On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 21:55:04 -0000 (UTC), pothead
<pothead@snakebite.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
<105p1bn$kd7h$5@dont-email.me> wrote:
On 2025-07-22, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 05:29:41 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>
On Mon, 21 Jul 2025 14:35:34 -0700, Randolf Richardson ???
<randolf@canadianatheists.ca> in alt.atheism with message-id
<20250721143534.8283a9f6154902ac73f81d45@canadianatheists.ca>
wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jul 2025 18:19:42 -0700
"Royce C. Lamberth" <judge@us.district.gob> wrote:
From the Supreme Court:
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain
in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
It is not a crime. Improper entry is a crime, but unlawful presence is not.
This is settled.
Oh, so that's why Donald Trump isn't deporting his wife.
In 1996, Mrs. Trump moved to New York, and 10 years later,
she proudly became a United States Citizen, making her the
only First Lady to become a naturalized citizen
How much time did she spend illegally working in the US before then?
You libbys are really stretching to attack Trump.
Melania came to US on a tourist visa.
She later obtained an H-1B visa which allowed her to work.
then she obtained an EB-1 visa, you might want to look that one up,
but the E stands for Einstein.
And who, but you demons care?
Why would he assume she spent any time here illegally?
She worked illegally, you stupid fuck. She worked as a model in NYC in the 1990s
when she was here on a tourist visa. And fuck off with this "EB-1" visa
bullshit. She got that based on Trumpy's connections, not any "extraordinary"
ability she had.
More Rudy kicking my Nazi rapist ass.
On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 01:51:30 -0000 (UTC), pothead
<pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
On 2025-07-24, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 19:47:40 -0400, Governor Swill wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 21:55:04 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
Melania came to US on a tourist visa.
She later obtained an H-1B visa which allowed her to work.
then she obtained an EB-1 visa, you might want to look that one up, >>>>>but the E stands for Einstein.
It helps to have powerful connections.
I dispute your claim that she was doing porn on an H-1B.
Prove it.
Well, pothead? Did she get her H-1B *before* she started doing porn?
For that matter, did she get her H-1B before she entered the country?
Waiting for your response.
<https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/11/04/melania-trump-undocumented-work/93321114/>
She had 10 modeling jobs and earned $20k
Big deal
"He worked in the fields last harvest and made $10k."
Everytime you open your mouth on this subject, you show your bigotry.
It's perfectly ok for Melania, who is white, to come here and work
illegally (which is likely why she came to start with) but not for
anybody with brown skin or who isn't willing to show you her titties.
You demons are really sinking low these days.
What's the matter?
Trump destroying your commie, woke, tranny, green new scam world?
Yea, he is.
That's why I voted for him.
I'm not a commie or a tranny. I do support environmental awareness
because I remember when the air outside stank worse than the air
inside. I remember taking a pet duckling to the park for a swim. I
admired the cool rainbow colors on the water. The duck was dead the
next morning.
That's why we have an EPA. And so is this:
"Kingston Fossil Plant coal fly ash slurry spill"
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingston_Fossil_Plant_coal_fly_ash_slurry_spill>
That sort of thing would be far less likely to happen if Republican governments would stop pulling the EPA's teeth.
Meanwhile you demons defend human traffickers, wife beaters, MS-13 gang members.
And you wonder why the people are sick of your left wing bullshit?
Don't know who you think you're talking about the fact of the matter
is those crimes come from the right. Leftist philosophy is based on compassion for others (WWJD) not control of them.
On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 01:51:30 -0000 (UTC), pothead
<pot sticks and stems removed>
<snipped the long rebuttal of crockpot's nonsense>
Since you have likely not bothered to read all of this post, I might
as well predict that you won't respond because you can't. You make outrageous posts but you never defend them - they're indefensible. The
facts are not or your side. You are not living in the real world.
You're living in a fantasy constructed by some of the most incompetent
haters to ever draw breath.
On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 00:50:13 -0400, Attila wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 "Delma T. Ivey" wrote:<snip>
On 7/23/2025 3:24 AM, Attila, racist Nazi rapist and liar, lied:
On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 21:55:04 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
Melania came to US on a tourist visa.
She later obtained an H-1B visa which allowed her to work.
then she obtained an EB-1 visa, you might want to look that one up,
but the E stands for Einstein.
And who, but you demons care?
Why would he assume she spent any time here illegally?
She worked illegally, you stupid fuck. She worked as a model in NYC in the 1990s
when she was here on a tourist visa. And fuck off with this "EB-1" visa
bullshit. She got that based on Trumpy's connections, not any "extraordinary"
ability she had.
More Rudy Rage
Yet 100% accurate.
On 7/23/2025 9:50 PM, Attila, racist Nazi rapist and liar, lied:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 20:29:55 -0700, "Delma T. Ivey"
<somewhere@thegreatbeyond.con> in alt.atheism with
message-id <TMhgQ.59373$QtA1.2093@fx16.iad> wrote:
On 7/23/2025 3:24 AM, Attila, racist Nazi rapist and liar, lied:
On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 07:50:16 -0700, "Delma T. Ivey" <somewhere@thegreatbeyond.con> in alt.atheism with
message-id <IKrgQ.15724$RKVc.10504@fx12.iad> wrote:
On 7/23/2025 9:50 PM, Attila, racist Nazi rapist and liar, lied:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 20:29:55 -0700, "Delma T. Ivey"
<somewhere@thegreatbeyond.con> in alt.atheism with
message-id <TMhgQ.59373$QtA1.2093@fx16.iad> wrote:
On 7/23/2025 3:24 AM, Attila, racist Nazi rapist and liar, lied:
More Rudy kicking my lying Nazi rapist ass.
On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 14:58:06 -0000 (UTC), pothead
<pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
On 2025-07-24, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 01:51:30 -0000 (UTC), pothead >>><pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
On 2025-07-24, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 19:47:40 -0400, Governor Swill wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 21:55:04 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
Melania came to US on a tourist visa.
She later obtained an H-1B visa which allowed her to work.
then she obtained an EB-1 visa, you might want to look that one up, >>>>>>>but the E stands for Einstein.
It helps to have powerful connections.
I dispute your claim that she was doing porn on an H-1B.
Prove it.
Well, pothead? Did she get her H-1B *before* she started doing porn? >>>>> For that matter, did she get her H-1B before she entered the country? >>>>>
Waiting for your response.
<https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/11/04/melania-trump-undocumented-work/93321114/>
She had 10 modeling jobs and earned $20k
Big deal
"He worked in the fields last harvest and made $10k."
Good.
Then he should be at the end of the list to be deported.
Why? He's here illegally and he's working illegally. That's two
reasons to get rid of him.
Everytime you open your mouth on this subject, you show your bigotry.
It's perfectly ok for Melania, who is white, to come here and work
illegally (which is likely why she came to start with) but not for
anybody with brown skin or who isn't willing to show you her titties.
So how do you explain that my solution is to give the DACA people a path
to citizenship assuming they have not been involved in serious crimes. >>Biden should have taken that path instead of opening the borders.
Actually he did do that. Or are you claiming that Biden shut down
Obama's DACA plan?
Someone who is a bigot would never allow that.
Or it's just cover. What about amnesty to legalize those already here
and allow them to work?
Get help for your TDS.That would be you and all the others who think Trump can do no wrong
and that character no longer matters.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 21:54:58 |
| Calls: | 10,390 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 14,061 |
| Messages: | 6,416,988 |