On Sun, 1 Jun 2025 02:29:59 -0000 (UTC), pothead
<pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
On 2025-05-31, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
What physical tasks do women have advantages in?
Can men gestate and give birth to a baby, genius? Is that not a >>>>>little more vital than sports?
The subject here is sports. Your inability to address what I said
says everything.
You said "physical tasks", giving birth is nothing if not that.
However, not all *sports* are alike, either. That's one fatal mistake
you anti-trans assholes make, constantly - if the sport is privately
funded, they make their own rule on this, you can fuck right off. If
it's publicly funded, we still have to look at the merits of each kind
of sport individually. You're welcome for the lesson in common sense.
So Joel since you seem to be the expert on all things trans I'd be curious >>as to what your opinion is regarding this scenario.
So let's say my 13 yo son comes home from school one day and tells me
he wants to be a girl.
After the initial shock wore off this is how I would approach this.
1. Talk to my son so I could understand what is driving this.
2. Research mental health professionals specializing in trans.
3. If he seemed super sincere, I would explain to him how this works and that >>this is probably normal puberty fantasies and that he would probably grow out of it.
I doubt he will buy this because when my parents told me something was "normal" I never
bought it either.
So, I would of course have extended dialog with him but ultimately I would >>support him and explain what is needed to change sex and so forth.
You were fine right up until there. Since you KNOW he will grow out
of this, why would you allow him to permanently maim himself?
At this point if I was convinced that he was serious I would take him shopping
for girl clothes, get his hair done, makeup and all of that and at first I >>would require him to live as a girl after school hours but with the understanding
that at some point he had to show me he was serious and would go to school >>dressed as a girl.
Of course counseling would be part of this.
With some shrink who doesn't view this as a mental illness of course.
I suspect, but don't know for sure, that early on in this process he
would come to his senses and abandon this process. But maybe not.
What say you Joel?
You believe in abusing children...
On 2025-06-01, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Sun, 1 Jun 2025 02:29:59 -0000 (UTC), pothead
<pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
On 2025-05-31, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
What physical tasks do women have advantages in?
Can men gestate and give birth to a baby, genius? Is that not a >>>>>>little more vital than sports?
The subject here is sports. Your inability to address what I said >>>>>says everything.
You said "physical tasks", giving birth is nothing if not that.
However, not all *sports* are alike, either. That's one fatal mistake >>>> you anti-trans assholes make, constantly - if the sport is privately
funded, they make their own rule on this, you can fuck right off. If
it's publicly funded, we still have to look at the merits of each kind >>>> of sport individually. You're welcome for the lesson in common sense. >>>>
So Joel since you seem to be the expert on all things trans I'd be curious >>>as to what your opinion is regarding this scenario.
So let's say my 13 yo son comes home from school one day and tells me
he wants to be a girl.
After the initial shock wore off this is how I would approach this.
1. Talk to my son so I could understand what is driving this.
2. Research mental health professionals specializing in trans.
3. If he seemed super sincere, I would explain to him how this works and that
this is probably normal puberty fantasies and that he would probably grow out of it.
I doubt he will buy this because when my parents told me something was "normal" I never
bought it either.
So, I would of course have extended dialog with him but ultimately I would >>>support him and explain what is needed to change sex and so forth.
You were fine right up until there. Since you KNOW he will grow out
of this, why would you allow him to permanently maim himself?
I wouldn't.
No drugs.
No surgery.
Nothing but mental health counseling.
When he becomes an adult he can do what he wants.
At this point if I was convinced that he was serious I would take him shopping
for girl clothes, get his hair done, makeup and all of that and at first I >>>would require him to live as a girl after school hours but with the understanding
that at some point he had to show me he was serious and would go to school >>>dressed as a girl.
Of course counseling would be part of this.
With some shrink who doesn't view this as a mental illness of course.
Nope.
This would not be some 45 minute session with a kook but rather a
top doctor in the field working with my son to find out WHY he
feels this way.
I believe it's a mental disorder and there is almost always a source
for that disorder.
I suspect, but don't know for sure, that early on in this process he >>>would come to his senses and abandon this process. But maybe not.
What say you Joel?
You believe in abusing children...
Of course not.
I believe parents should be involved in their children's mental health
how these days the left is bombarding them with changing your sex is
a normal, everyday thing and some kids actually believe it because they
do not understand what's involved.
Most kids have fantasies about what it would be like to be the opposite
sex.
It's normal and it is temporary.
However when the media is bombarding these same kids with trans crap they
can get trapped into thinking their fantasies are real.
My feeling is it would never get that far as one day of going to school or out in public
in a dress etc would be more than enough to bring a son to his senses.
It may sound cruel but compared to the alternative.........
On 6/2/2025 7:43 AM, Baxter wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:4mop3ktrimfdk1fca5c6l2iq4v21vpr4nh@4ax.com:
On Sun, 1 Jun 2025 21:47:59 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
=============
Jesse Watters cited research while claiming that a desk job “makes you >>>> a woman.” It was a take so dizzy that “The Five” cohost Jeanine Pirro
pushed back. (Watch the video below.)
The Fox News panelists on Monday were debating a MAGA author’s claim >>>> that President Donald Trump’s tariffs will reverse a crisis of
masculinity in the U.S. by bringing back jobs requiring brawn.
Watters, whose comments on gender are annoyingly frequent, weighed in. >>>>
“When you sit behind a screen all day, it makes you a woman,” he said. >>>> “Studies have shown this,” he continued as one of the panelists
cackled. “Studies have shown this!”
“If you’re out working ... you are around other guys; you’re not >>>> around HR ladies and lawyers. That gives you estrogen,” he said.
https://sg.news.yahoo.com/jesse-watters-makes-staggering-claim-
144423153.html
Why do you think I care what Jessie Waters says?
Because you love FAUX NUZ
You're in the minority if you don't.
On 6/2/2025 7:52 AM, Baxter wrote:
Bob Seefreed <seefreedb@oracle.nut> wrote in news:101ispo$9uc$2
@toxic.dizum.net:
On 01 Jun 2025, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> posted some
news:101ihmf$2h8vn$1@dont-email.me:
vegas <no-reply@976hos.com> wrote in
news:a2df82dbec.1748808139@wvhbz.zv:
On 01 Jun 2025, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> posted someanguish-
news:101i07k$29nl4$4@dont-email.me:
On 31/5/25 22:39, Governor Swill wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 11:09:22 -0700, Siri Cruz
<chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
If you cannot stand the heat, burn down the kitchen.
<https://www.fox9.com/news/lawyer-says-trump-suffered-mental-
But falsifying and redistributing media content about the electionafter-cbs-interview-kamala-harris>
President Donald Trump has so far refused to dismiss a
$20 billion lawsuit against CBS News over how the outlet edited a >>>>>>>> "60 Minutes" interview with Kamala Harris last year.
In a new court filing, Trump's lawyer said the interview
led to "mental anguish" for Trump.
CBS News is trying to get the lawsuit dismissed, but
they're also engaged in settlement talks, as the Trump
administration has to approve its parent company's merger with >>>>>>>> Skydance Media.
A POTUS is suing the Press because he didn't like a story they
published?
Has the Orangutan *still* not read the Bill of Rights?
The injustices of the supreme court have not.
Falsifying and redistributing media content related to an election
debate isn't the same thing as "free speech".
itself is OK?
Editing and distributing with the intent to influence an election
outcome is the same thing as lying and libeling. I know it's tough for >>> you Pacific NorthWest hicks to grasp concepts like that. Falsifying is >>> the same thing as lying. Compare to Letitia James and her loan
applications.
The CBS/60 Minutes did NOT falsify anything.
They did by omission attempting to sway / interfere with an election.
That's tRump's shakedown claim. Has no basis in fact. There was NO
attempt to interfere with the election.
You should watch the editing job and
Trump didn't rape that ugly old purse of herpes E. Jean Carroll either.
In article <milt3khjjinp4b8teo7pfpb6n18m6e3dv3@4ax.com>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
Please post a link the thread you authored about the illegal who just
burned people to death in Colorado. Oh I guess you didn't actually
care about Americans being burned to death.
He apparently overstayed a visa, not really an "illegal", but "I guess
you don't actually care about" women and children bombed to hell in
Gaza, this character in CO was obviously nuts, violence isn't the
answer, but you can expect this kind of wild stuff in reaction to the
war, the U.S. backed Israel in it, we're culpable to the destruction.
You support baby killers
On 6/2/2025 4:29 PM, spammy fucktard lied:
On 6/2/2025 7:52 AM, Baxter wrote:
Bob Seefreed <seefreedb@oracle.nut> wrote in news:101ispo$9uc$2
@toxic.dizum.net:
On 01 Jun 2025, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> posted some
news:101ihmf$2h8vn$1@dont-email.me:
vegas <no-reply@976hos.com> wrote in
news:a2df82dbec.1748808139@wvhbz.zv:
On 01 Jun 2025, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> posted someanguish-
news:101i07k$29nl4$4@dont-email.me:
On 31/5/25 22:39, Governor Swill wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 11:09:22 -0700, Siri Cruz
<chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
If you cannot stand the heat, burn down the kitchen.
<https://www.fox9.com/news/lawyer-says-trump-suffered-mental-
But falsifying and redistributing media content about the electionafter-cbs-interview-kamala-harris>
President Donald Trump has so far refused to dismiss a >>>>>>>> $20 billion lawsuit against CBS News over how the outlet edited a >>>>>>>> "60 Minutes" interview with Kamala Harris last year.
In a new court filing, Trump's lawyer said the interview >>>>>>>> led to "mental anguish" for Trump.
CBS News is trying to get the lawsuit dismissed, but >>>>>>>> they're also engaged in settlement talks, as the Trump
administration has to approve its parent company's merger with >>>>>>>> Skydance Media.
A POTUS is suing the Press because he didn't like a story they >>>>>>> published?
Has the Orangutan *still* not read the Bill of Rights?
The injustices of the supreme court have not.
Falsifying and redistributing media content related to an election >>>>> debate isn't the same thing as "free speech".
itself is OK?
Editing and distributing with the intent to influence an election
outcome is the same thing as lying and libeling. I know it's tough for >>> you Pacific NorthWest hicks to grasp concepts like that. Falsifying is >>> the same thing as lying. Compare to Letitia James and her loan
applications.
The CBS/60 Minutes did NOT falsify anything.
They did by omission attempting to sway / interfere with an election.
That's tRump's shakedown claim. Has no basis in fact. There was NO
attempt to interfere with the election.
You should watch the editing job and
Not election interference, spammy fucktard.
Trump didn't rape that ugly old purse of herpes E. Jean Carroll either.
He did. The judge ruled that he did.
On Tue, 03 Jun 2025 07:15:48 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
Please post a link the thread you authored about the illegal who just
burned people to death in Colorado. Oh I guess you didn't actually
care about Americans being burned to death.
He apparently overstayed a visa, not really an "illegal", but "I guess
you don't actually care about" women and children bombed to hell in
Gaza, this character in CO was obviously nuts, violence isn't the
answer, but you can expect this kind of wild stuff in reaction to the
war, the U.S. backed Israel in it, we're culpable to the destruction.
The moment he "overstayed" he became illegal so
On 03 Jun 2025, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> posted some news:milt3khjjinp4b8teo7pfpb6n18m6e3dv3@4ax.com:
NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
Please post a link the thread you authored about the illegal who just
burned people to death in Colorado. Oh I guess you didn't actually
care about Americans being burned to death.
He apparently overstayed a visa, not really an "illegal", but "I guess
you don't actually care about" women and children bombed to hell in
Gaza, this character in CO was obviously nuts, violence isn't the
answer, but you can expect this kind of wild stuff in reaction to the
war, the U.S. backed Israel in it, we're culpable to the destruction.
Intentionally
overstaying a visa is grounds for immediate apprehensionBecause it's impossible to know *where* the visa overstays are, Blowjob, you *fat* stupid fucking cuck.
and removal. Why weren't Biden and Mayorkas doing it?
On 6/4/2025 3:59 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jun 2025 07:15:48 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
Please post a link the thread you authored about the illegal who just
burned people to death in Colorado. Oh I guess you didn't actually
care about Americans being burned to death.
He apparently overstayed a visa, not really an "illegal", but "I guess
you don't actually care about" women and children bombed to hell in
Gaza, this character in CO was obviously nuts, violence isn't the
answer, but you can expect this kind of wild stuff in reaction to the
war, the U.S. backed Israel in it, we're culpable to the destruction.
The moment he "overstayed" he became illegal so
No. He became unlawfully present. No crime was committed.
Blowjob *still* hasn't figured out what his tell is ? what a fucking moron.
On 6/3/2025 12:53 PM, Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly obese convicted child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 03 Jun 2025, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> posted some news:milt3khjjinp4b8teo7pfpb6n18m6e3dv3@4ax.com:
NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
Please post a link the thread you authored about the illegal who just
burned people to death in Colorado. Oh I guess you didn't actually
care about Americans being burned to death.
He apparently overstayed a visa, not really an "illegal", but "I guess
you don't actually care about" women and children bombed to hell in
Gaza, this character in CO was obviously nuts, violence isn't the
answer, but you can expect this kind of wild stuff in reaction to the
war, the U.S. backed Israel in it, we're culpable to the destruction.
Intentionally
Prove it, Blowjob.
overstaying a visa is grounds for immediate apprehensionBecause it's impossible to know *where* the visa overstays are, Blowjob, you *fat* stupid fucking cuck.
and removal. Why weren't Biden and Mayorkas doing it?
On 6/4/2025 3:59 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jun 2025 07:15:48 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
Please post a link the thread you authored about the illegal who just
burned people to death in Colorado. Oh I guess you didn't actually
care about Americans being burned to death.
He apparently overstayed a visa, not really an "illegal", but "I guess
you don't actually care about" women and children bombed to hell in
Gaza, this character in CO was obviously nuts, violence isn't the
answer, but you can expect this kind of wild stuff in reaction to the
war, the U.S. backed Israel in it, we're culpable to the destruction.
The moment he "overstayed" he became illegal so
No. He became unlawfully present. No crime was committed.
On 03 Jun 2025, Alan Bond <bondrock@ifx.net> posted some news:nlI%P.28340$Yx54.10628@fx40.iad:
On 6/2/2025 4:29 PM, spammy fucktard lied:
On 6/2/2025 7:52 AM, Baxter wrote:
Bob Seefreed <seefreedb@oracle.nut> wrote in news:101ispo$9uc$2
@toxic.dizum.net:
On 01 Jun 2025, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> posted some
news:101ihmf$2h8vn$1@dont-email.me:
vegas <no-reply@976hos.com> wrote in
news:a2df82dbec.1748808139@wvhbz.zv:
On 01 Jun 2025, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> posted someanguish-
news:101i07k$29nl4$4@dont-email.me:
On 31/5/25 22:39, Governor Swill wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 11:09:22 -0700, Siri Cruz
<chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
If you cannot stand the heat, burn down the kitchen.
<https://www.fox9.com/news/lawyer-says-trump-suffered-mental-
But falsifying and redistributing media content about the election >>>>>> itself is OK?after-cbs-interview-kamala-harris>
President Donald Trump has so far refused >>>>>>>>>> to dismiss a $20 billion lawsuit against CBS News over how the >>>>>>>>>> outlet edited a "60 Minutes" interview with Kamala Harris last >>>>>>>>>> year. In a new court filing, Trump's lawyer >>>>>>>>>> said the interview led to "mental anguish" for Trump.
CBS News is trying to get the lawsuit
dismissed, but they're also engaged in settlement talks, as >>>>>>>>>> the Trump administration has to approve its parent company's >>>>>>>>>> merger with Skydance Media.
A POTUS is suing the Press because he didn't like a story they >>>>>>>>> published?
Has the Orangutan *still* not read the Bill of Rights?
The injustices of the supreme court have not.
Falsifying and redistributing media content related to an
election debate isn't the same thing as "free speech".
Editing and distributing with the intent to influence an election
outcome is the same thing as lying and libeling. I know it's
tough for you Pacific NorthWest hicks to grasp concepts like
that. Falsifying is the same thing as lying. Compare to Letitia
James and her loan applications.
The CBS/60 Minutes did NOT falsify anything.
They did by omission attempting to sway / interfere with an
election.
That's tRump's shakedown claim. Has no basis in fact. There was
NO attempt to interfere with the election.
You should watch the editing job and
Not election interference, spammy fucktard.
Trump didn't rape that ugly old purse of herpes E. Jean Carroll
either.
He did. The judge ruled that he did.
The judge is corrupt and
On 04 Jun 2025, F. Georg McDuffee <gmcguffee@mcgoofy-associates.us> posted some
news:G%%%P.95955$mAv4.78840@fx34.iad:
On 6/4/2025 3:59 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jun 2025 07:15:48 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
Please post a link the thread you authored about the illegal who
just burned people to death in Colorado. Oh I guess you didn't
actually care about Americans being burned to death.
He apparently overstayed a visa, not really an "illegal", but "I
guess you don't actually care about" women and children bombed to
hell in Gaza, this character in CO was obviously nuts, violence
isn't the answer, but you can expect this kind of wild stuff in
reaction to the war, the U.S. backed Israel in it, we're culpable to
the destruction.
The moment he "overstayed" he became illegal so
No. He became unlawfully present. No crime was committed.
Semantics.
He violated a condition of presence
that he agreed to and is subject to penalty.
On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 11:11:51 -0700, "F. Georg McDuffee" <gmcguffee@mcgoofy-associates.us> wrote:
On 6/4/2025 3:59 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jun 2025 07:15:48 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
Please post a link the thread you authored about the illegal who just >>>>> burned people to death in Colorado. Oh I guess you didn't actually
care about Americans being burned to death.
He apparently overstayed a visa, not really an "illegal", but "I guess >>>> you don't actually care about" women and children bombed to hell in
Gaza, this character in CO was obviously nuts, violence isn't the
answer, but you can expect this kind of wild stuff in reaction to the
war, the U.S. backed Israel in it, we're culpable to the destruction.
The moment he "overstayed" he became illegal so
No. He became unlawfully present. No crime was committed.
He's an illegal.
In article <G%%%P.95955$mAv4.78840@fx34.iad>,
gmcguffee@mcgoofy-associates.us says...
On 6/4/2025 3:59 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jun 2025 07:15:48 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
Please post a link the thread you authored about the illegal who just
burned people to death in Colorado. Oh I guess you didn't actually
care about Americans being burned to death.
He apparently overstayed a visa, not really an "illegal", but "I guess
you don't actually care about" women and children bombed to hell in
Gaza, this character in CO was obviously nuts, violence isn't the
answer, but you can expect this kind of wild stuff in reaction to the
war, the U.S. backed Israel in it, we're culpable to the destruction.
The moment he "overstayed" he became illegal so
No. He became unlawfully present. No crime was committed.
Yes. He can be deported.
In article <N100Q.95956$mAv4.20535@fx34.iad>,
treasure@sierramadre.con says...
Blowjob *still* hasn't figured out what his tell is ? what a fucking
moron.
On 6/3/2025 12:53 PM, Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly obese
convicted child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 03 Jun 2025, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> posted some
news:milt3khjjinp4b8teo7pfpb6n18m6e3dv3@4ax.com:
NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
Please post a link the thread you authored about the illegal who just
burned people to death in Colorado. Oh I guess you didn't actually
care about Americans being burned to death.
He apparently overstayed a visa, not really an "illegal", but "I guess
you don't actually care about" women and children bombed to hell in
Gaza, this character in CO was obviously nuts, violence isn't the
answer, but you can expect this kind of wild stuff in reaction to the
war, the U.S. backed Israel in it, we're culpable to the destruction.
Intentionally
Prove it, Blowjob.
overstaying a visa is grounds for immediate apprehensionBecause it's impossible to know *where* the visa overstays are, Blowjob,
and removal. Why weren't Biden and Mayorkas doing it?
you
*fat* stupid fucking cuck.
I think ICE has that figured out.
In article <G%%%P.95955$mAv4.78840@fx34.iad>,
gmcguffee@mcgoofy-associates.us says...
On 6/4/2025 3:59 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jun 2025 07:15:48 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
Please post a link the thread you authored about the illegal who just >>>>> burned people to death in Colorado. Oh I guess you didn't actually
care about Americans being burned to death.
He apparently overstayed a visa, not really an "illegal", but "I guess >>>> you don't actually care about" women and children bombed to hell in
Gaza, this character in CO was obviously nuts, violence isn't the
answer, but you can expect this kind of wild stuff in reaction to the
war, the U.S. backed Israel in it, we're culpable to the destruction.
The moment he "overstayed" he became illegal so
No. He became unlawfully present. No crime was committed.
Yes.
He can be deported.
On Wed, 04 Jun 2025 10:35:31 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jun 2025 16:07:02 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
artimus <atm@youtoob.uk> wrote:
On 03 Jun 2025, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> posted some
news:milt3khjjinp4b8teo7pfpb6n18m6e3dv3@4ax.com:
NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:Intentionally overstaying a visa is grounds for immediate apprehension >>>>> and removal. Why weren't Biden and Mayorkas doing it?
Please post a link the thread you authored about the illegal who just >>>>>>> burned people to death in Colorado. Oh I guess you didn't actually >>>>>>> care about Americans being burned to death.
He apparently overstayed a visa, not really an "illegal", but "I guess >>>>>> you don't actually care about" women and children bombed to hell in >>>>>> Gaza, this character in CO was obviously nuts, violence isn't the
answer, but you can expect this kind of wild stuff in reaction to the >>>>>> war, the U.S. backed Israel in it, we're culpable to the destruction. >>>>>
Probably because it would conflict with privacy concerns, and just
wasn't warranted.
Laughter. Privacy concerns...
Yeah, you know, in a "free country" we can't have agents just body-
slamming and arresting people willy-nilly. FFS, why do you let your
mind be misdirected so much?
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to
deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you
overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here.
On 6/5/2025 5:32 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and
gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled
and lied:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:101rurb$1gohr$4@dont- email.me...
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to
deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you
overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here.
How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be
deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others
who cannot be deported?
The same way we do now
You admit you have no answer, scooter. You *don't know* how it's
done now, scooter.
On 05 Jun 2025, Klaus Schadenfreude <katt@gmail.com> posted some news:O%j0Q.994658$6%s6.399363@fx12.iad:
On 6/5/2025 5:19 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly obese convicted child
molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 04 Jun 2025, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> posted some
news:101q0gq$r3uu$5@dont-email.me:
On 6/4/25 06:59, NoBody wrote:
...
The
problem is that THEY elected the government that decided to
slaughter 1000 jews in one night.
The last election held in Gaza was back in 2006 = 19 years ago...
...today, ~75% of Gaza's population is under age 25.
That means that at least 75% of the population were too young (or
not even born yet) to have participated in their last election.
I detest libs who will go after Israel for
defending themselves.
AFAIC, a major problem are Zionists who are knowingly and
deliberately stealing land. To criticize their illegal behavior
is then being deliberately & wrongfully conflated as being
antisemitic when it is not.
Israel has been around longer than Palestine for 1000+ years.
What's amusing is that the their prophet Mohammad indicated that area
was the 'ancestral home of the Jews' since time began.
He was talking about all of the Arabian peninsula, scooter, you
ignorant fucktard.
Thank you for confirming Palestinians are
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:The Trump regime doesn't care about respecting rights. Trump says only he has rights.
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to
deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you
overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here.
How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others who cannot be deported?
They should be sterilized or euthanized to prevent further
contamination of society.
On 05 Jun 2025, Michael A Terrell <mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut>
posted some news:H0k0Q.994743$6%s6.827408@fx12.iad:
On 6/4/2025 2:58 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted
another content-free batch of lies:
In article <G%%%P.95955$mAv4.78840@fx34.iad>,
gmcguffee@mcgoofy-associates.us says...
On 6/4/2025 3:59 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jun 2025 07:15:48 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com>
wrote:
NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
Please post a link the thread you authored about the illegal who >>>>>>> just burned people to death in Colorado. Oh I guess you didn't
actually care about Americans being burned to death.
He apparently overstayed a visa, not really an "illegal", but "I
guess you don't actually care about" women and children bombed to
hell in Gaza, this character in CO was obviously nuts, violence
isn't the answer, but you can expect this kind of wild stuff in
reaction to the war, the U.S. backed Israel in it, we're culpable
to the destruction.
The moment he "overstayed" he became illegal so
No. He became unlawfully present. No crime was committed.
Yes.
No. No crime was committed.
He can be deported.
But he can't be imprisoned. Deportation is not a criminal punishment,
you fucking moron.
They can be imprisoned awaiting deportation once apprehended.
On 6/5/2025 4:25 AM, Siri Cruz wrote:
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:The Trump regime doesn't care about respecting rights. Trump says
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to
deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you
overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here.
How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be
deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others
who cannot be deported?
only he has rights.
On 5/6/25 10:13, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
On 6/5/2025 5:32 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and
gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled
and lied:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:101rurb$1gohr$4@dont- email.me...
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to
deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you
overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here.
How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be
deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others
who cannot be deported?
The same way we do now
You admit you have no answer, scooter. You *don't know* how it's
done now, scooter.
ICE has to name their targets. They know who they think is
deportable. This is slow and expensive. When felons escape
prison, same methods. Marshals cannot stop random people to
demand they prove they are not felons. The felons have to be
found as individuals. Which is why it can take long time.
Scuppers is upset because ICE has to do it this way. Darn that
pesky Constitution.
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 11:31:15 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On 5/6/25 10:13, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
On 6/5/2025 5:32 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and
gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled
and lied:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:101rurb$1gohr$4@dont- email.me...
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to
deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you
overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here.
How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be
deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others
who cannot be deported?
The same way we do now
You admit you have no answer, scooter. You *don't know* how it's
done now, scooter.
ICE has to name their targets. They know who they think is
deportable. This is slow and expensive. When felons escape
prison, same methods. Marshals cannot stop random people to
demand they prove they are not felons. The felons have to be
found as individuals. Which is why it can take long time.
Scuppers is upset because ICE has to do it this way. Darn that
pesky Constitution.
Tell us what the precise process is now. You're rambling at this
point.
On 6/5/2025 11:31 AM, Siri Cruz wrote:
On 5/6/25 10:13, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
On 6/5/2025 5:32 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and
gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled
and lied:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:101rurb$1gohr$4@dont- email.me...
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to
deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you
overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here.
How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be
deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others
who cannot be deported?
The same way we do now
You admit you have no answer, scooter. You *don't know* how it's
done now, scooter.
ICE has to name their targets. They know who they think is deportable.
No, they don't. That's the whole problem. There are more than 10 million unlawfully present aliens, both visa overstays and those who have committed improper entry, and Trump's immigration Gestapo have no fucking idea who they are, let alone where they are.
This is slow and expensive.
As is proper.
When felons escape prison, same methods. Marshals cannot
stop random people to demand they prove they are not felons.
Exactly right ? as is proper.
The felons have to be found as individuals. Which is why it can take long time.
Scuppers is upset because ICE has to do it this way. Darn that pesky Constitution.
Exactly right again. scooter and all right-wingnuts hate the fourth and fifth amendments. They hate liberty. They tell us that every day.
[malicious crossposting to comp.os.linux.advocacy by *shitbag* removed]
On 6/6/2025 10:27 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:101v8b7$2ct8n$5@dont-
email.me...
On 6/6/25 4:07, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:25:31 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to
deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you
overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here.
How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be
deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others who
cannot be deported?
Just explain how privacy is a factor.
'without encroaching on rights of citizens'.
So there is no factor.
So of course there is, scooter, you stupid fuck. If Trump's immigration Gestapo
just start snatching people off the street based on a mere "hunch" that they are
unlawfully present, then they are violating the people's fourth amendment right
to be free from unreasonable search and seizure. And that is *exactly* what Trump's immigration Gestapo are doing, scooter, you stupid fuck. They even mistakenly detained a U.S. Marshal in court yesterday, scooter.
What is the purpose of the fourth amendment, scooter? Answer: to protect people's privacy.
[malicious crossposting to comp.os.linux.advocacy by *shitbag* removed]
On 6/6/2025 6:02 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
Blowjob is too stupid to realize his tell. What a fucking idiot!
On 05 Jun 2025, Michael A Terrell <mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut>
posted some news:H0k0Q.994743$6%s6.827408@fx12.iad:
On 6/4/2025 2:58 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted
another content-free batch of lies:
In article <G%%%P.95955$mAv4.78840@fx34.iad>,
gmcguffee@mcgoofy-associates.us says...
On 6/4/2025 3:59 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jun 2025 07:15:48 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com>
wrote:
NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
Please post a link the thread you authored about the illegal who >>>>>>>> just burned people to death in Colorado. Oh I guess you didn't >>>>>>>> actually care about Americans being burned to death.
He apparently overstayed a visa, not really an "illegal", but "I >>>>>>> guess you don't actually care about" women and children bombed to >>>>>>> hell in Gaza, this character in CO was obviously nuts, violence >>>>>>> isn't the answer, but you can expect this kind of wild stuff in >>>>>>> reaction to the war, the U.S. backed Israel in it, we're culpable >>>>>>> to the destruction.
The moment he "overstayed" he became illegal so
No. He became unlawfully present. No crime was committed.
Yes.
No. No crime was committed.
He can be deported.
But he can't be imprisoned. Deportation is not a criminal punishment,
you fucking moron.
They can be imprisoned awaiting deportation once apprehended.
They can be held, Blowjob. It's not incarceration, which is punishment for a criminal conviction. Unlawful presence is not a crime, Blowjob.
Heck,
A scooterism ? worthless superfluous wheeze.
scooterisms:
"Actually..." [empty padding]
"Further..." [empty padding]
"Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
"And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent immediately before fleeing]
"On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting]
"And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant and pointless]
"Heck..." [empty padding]
"Well..." [empty padding]
"After all..." [empty padding]
"In fact..." [empty padding]
"Indeed..." [empty padding; this is one of "pothole's" favorites, too]
"I acknowledge that..." [something that hasn't happened, so not subject to acknowledgment]
"So what you're saying..." [what follows is *always* something the opponent *never* said, i.e. a straw man]
"TRANSLATION:..." [the same as "so what you're saying..." ? a straw man] "Rudy/Baxter/Lee admits..." same as "so what you're saying" and "TRANSLATION:.."
? a straw man]
"Where in the Constitution does it say..." [about shit that wouldn't *be* in the
Constitution anyway]
"insure" [he means "ensure"; they are *not* synonyms]
"it's" [he means the possessive "its"]
"its" [he means the contraction "it's"]
"and" [he means "an"]
"an" [he means "and"]
"where" [he means "were"]
"were" [he means "where"]
"creditability" [he means "credibility"; "creditability" is not a word]
if it was illegal [sic] entry
Not the topic, scooter. The topic is unlawful presence, not improper entry. The
term in the U.S.C. is *improper* entry, scooter, not "illegal."
Unlawful presence is not a crime, scooter. Improper entry is, but unlawful presence is not. A foreigner who overstays his visa has not committed any immigration crime, scooter.
On 06 Jun 2025, Klaus Schadenfreude <katt@gmail.com> posted some news:OpG0Q.439219$aGDe.347039@fx13.iad:
[malicious crossposting to comp.os.linux.advocacy by *shitbag*
removed]
On 6/6/2025 10:27 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:101v8b7$2ct8n$5@dont- email.me...
On 6/6/25 4:07, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:25:31 -0700, Siri Cruz
<chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to
deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you
overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here.
How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be
deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others who
cannot be deported?
Just explain how privacy is a factor.
'without encroaching on rights of citizens'.
So there is no factor.
So of course there is, scooter, you stupid fuck.
You said a bad word
In article <OpG0Q.439219$aGDe.347039@fx13.iad>,
katt@gmail.com says...
[malicious crossposting to comp.os.linux.advocacy by *shitbag* removed]
On 6/6/2025 10:27 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:101v8b7$2ct8n$5@dont-
email.me...
On 6/6/25 4:07, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:25:31 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> >>>>> wrote:
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to
deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you
overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here.
How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be
deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others who
cannot be deported?
Just explain how privacy is a factor.
'without encroaching on rights of citizens'.
So there is no factor.
So of course there is, scooter, you stupid fuck. If Trump's immigration Gestapo
just start snatching people off the street based on a mere "hunch" that they are
unlawfully present, then they are violating the people's fourth amendment right
to be free from unreasonable search and seizure. And that is *exactly* what >> Trump's immigration Gestapo are doing, scooter, you stupid fuck. They even >> mistakenly detained a U.S. Marshal in court yesterday, scooter.
What is the purpose of the fourth amendment, scooter? Answer: to protect
people's privacy.
Proper ID would help.
[malicious crossposting to comp.os.linux.advocacy by *shitbag*
removed]
Blowjob is too stupid to realize his tell. What a fucking idiot!
On 6/6/2025 2:38 PM, Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly obese convicted child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 06 Jun 2025, Klaus Schadenfreude <katt@gmail.com> posted some
news:OpG0Q.439219$aGDe.347039@fx13.iad:
[malicious crossposting to comp.os.linux.advocacy by *shitbag*
removed]
On 6/6/2025 10:27 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and
gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and
lied:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:101v8b7$2ct8n$5@dont- email.me...
On 6/6/25 4:07, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:25:31 -0700, Siri Cruz
<chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to
deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you >>>>>>>> overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here.
How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be
deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others
who cannot be deported?
Just explain how privacy is a factor.
'without encroaching on rights of citizens'.
So there is no factor.
So of course there is, scooter, you stupid fuck.
You said a bad word
Too fucking bad, Blowjob, you stupid *fat* cuck.
On 06 Jun 2025, AlleyCat <al@aohello.con> posted some news:Z3K0Q.23102$U3v1.20755@fx07.iad:
[malicious crossposting to comp.os.linux.advocacy by *shitbag*
removed]
Blowjob is too stupid to realize his tell. What a fucking idiot!
On 6/6/2025 2:38 PM, Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly obese
convicted child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 06 Jun 2025, Klaus Schadenfreude <katt@gmail.com> posted some
news:OpG0Q.439219$aGDe.347039@fx13.iad:
[malicious crossposting to comp.os.linux.advocacy by *shitbag*
removed]
On 6/6/2025 10:27 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and
gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and
lied:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:101v8b7$2ct8n$5@dont- email.me...
On 6/6/25 4:07, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:25:31 -0700, Siri Cruz
<chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to >>>>>>>>> deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you >>>>>>>>> overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here. >>>>>>>>How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be
deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others
who cannot be deported?
Just explain how privacy is a factor.
'without encroaching on rights of citizens'.
So there is no factor.
So of course there is, scooter, you stupid fuck.
You said a bad word
Too fucking bad, Blowjob, you stupid *fat* cuck.
There you are kicking my fat cuck ass again.
On 06 Jun 2025, Michael A Terrell <mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut> posted
some news:D4K0Q.23107$U3v1.9426@fx07.iad:
On 6/6/2025 2:13 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted
another content-free batch of lies:
In article <ioG0Q.439218$aGDe.324577@fx13.iad>,
katt@gmail.com says...
On 6/5/2025 11:31 AM, Siri Cruz wrote:
On 5/6/25 10:13, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
On 6/5/2025 5:32 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and
gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled
and lied:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:101rurb$1gohr$4@dont- email.me...
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to >>>>>>>>> deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you >>>>>>>>> overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here. >>>>>>>>How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be
deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others
who cannot be deported?
The same way we do now
You admit you have no answer, scooter. You *don't know* how it's
done now, scooter.
ICE has to name their targets. They know who they think is
deportable.
No, they don't. That's the whole problem. There are more than 10
million unlawfully present aliens, both visa overstays and those who
have committed improper entry, and Trump's immigration Gestapo have
no fucking idea who they are, let alone where they are.
Show me zee papers.
We don't have to do that in this country, and we won't.
This is slow and expensive.
As is proper.
No.
Yes.
When felons escape prison, same methods. Marshals cannot
stop random people to demand they prove they are not felons.
Exactly right — as is proper.
The felons have to be found as individuals. Which is why it can
take long time.
Scuppers is upset because ICE has to do it this way. Darn that
pesky Constitution.
Exactly right again. scooter and all right-wingnuts hate the fourth
and fifth amendments. They hate liberty. They tell us that every
day.
You support
due process and the rule of law. That's correct.
Trump didn't rape that ugly old Christine Blasey Ford
left-wing martyr E. Jean Carroll either.
On 06 Jun 2025, Michael A Terrell <mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut>
posted some news:j4K0Q.23105$U3v1.13232@fx07.iad:
On 6/6/2025 2:16 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted
another content-free batch of lies:
In article <NqG0Q.439222$aGDe.283302@fx13.iad>,
katt@gmail.com says...
[malicious crossposting to comp.os.linux.advocacy by *shitbag*
removed]
On 6/6/2025 6:02 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and
gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and
lied:
Blowjob is too stupid to realize his tell. What a fucking idiot!
On 05 Jun 2025, Michael A Terrell <mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut>
posted some news:H0k0Q.994743$6%s6.827408@fx12.iad:
On 6/4/2025 2:58 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off
Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking
do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies:
In article <G%%%P.95955$mAv4.78840@fx34.iad>,
gmcguffee@mcgoofy-associates.us says...
On 6/4/2025 3:59 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jun 2025 07:15:48 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
Please post a link the thread you authored about the illegal >>>>>>>>>>>> who just burned people to death in Colorado. Oh I guess >>>>>>>>>>>> you didn't actually care about Americans being burned to >>>>>>>>>>>> death.
He apparently overstayed a visa, not really an "illegal", but >>>>>>>>>>> "I guess you don't actually care about" women and children >>>>>>>>>>> bombed to hell in Gaza, this character in CO was obviously >>>>>>>>>>> nuts, violence isn't the answer, but you can expect this kind >>>>>>>>>>> of wild stuff in reaction to the war, the U.S. backed Israel >>>>>>>>>>> in it, we're culpable to the destruction.
The moment he "overstayed" he became illegal so
No. He became unlawfully present. No crime was committed.
Yes.
No. No crime was committed.
He can be deported.
But he can't be imprisoned. Deportation is not a criminal
punishment, you fucking moron.
They can be imprisoned awaiting deportation once apprehended.
They can be held, Blowjob. It's not incarceration, which is
punishment for a criminal conviction. Unlawful presence is not a
crime, Blowjob.
Heck,
A scooterism ? worthless superfluous wheeze.
scooterisms:
"Actually..." [empty padding]
"Further..." [empty padding]
"Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
"And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent
immediately before fleeing]
"On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never*
refuting] "And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something
irrelevant and pointless] "Heck..." [empty padding]
"Well..." [empty padding]
"After all..." [empty padding]
"In fact..." [empty padding]
"Indeed..." [empty padding; this is one of "pothole's" favorites,
too] "I acknowledge that..." [something that hasn't happened, so not
subject to acknowledgment]
"So what you're saying..." [what follows is *always* something the
opponent *never* said, i.e. a straw man]
"TRANSLATION:..." [the same as "so what you're saying..." ? a straw
man] "Rudy/Baxter/Lee admits..." same as "so what you're saying" and
"TRANSLATION:.." ? a straw man]
"Where in the Constitution does it say..." [about shit that wouldn't
*be* in the Constitution anyway]
"insure" [he means "ensure"; they are *not* synonyms]
"it's" [he means the possessive "its"]
"its" [he means the contraction "it's"]
"and" [he means "an"]
"an" [he means "and"]
"where" [he means "were"]
"were" [he means "where"]
"creditability" [he means "credibility"; "creditability" is not a
word]
if it was illegal [sic] entry
Not the topic, scooter. The topic is unlawful presence, not improper
entry. The term in the U.S.C. is *improper* entry, scooter, not
"illegal."
Unlawful presence is not a crime, scooter. Improper entry is, but
unlawful presence is not. A foreigner who overstays his visa has not
committed any immigration crime, scooter.
Trespassing is.
Unlawful presence is not "trespassing," you stupid fucking disabled
cocksucker.
Okay, let's say walking towards the border when your Visa expires is not criminal. Walking away from the border when your Visa expires is an
attempt to evade and remain, so you're now in the same category as an invading burglar and we can shoot you. How's that?
On 06 Jun 2025, Klaus Schadenfreude <katt@gmail.com> posted some news:NqG0Q.439222$aGDe.283302@fx13.iad:
[malicious crossposting to comp.os.linux.advocacy by *shitbag*
removed]
You don't get to make the rules, restored.
On 6/6/2025 6:02 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
Blowjob is too stupid to realize his tell. What a fucking idiot!
On 05 Jun 2025, Michael A Terrell <mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut>
posted some news:H0k0Q.994743$6%s6.827408@fx12.iad:
On 6/4/2025 2:58 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off
Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking
do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies:
In article <G%%%P.95955$mAv4.78840@fx34.iad>,
gmcguffee@mcgoofy-associates.us says...
On 6/4/2025 3:59 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jun 2025 07:15:48 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote:
NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
Please post a link the thread you authored about the illegal >>>>>>>>>> who just burned people to death in Colorado. Oh I guess you >>>>>>>>>> didn't actually care about Americans being burned to death. >>>>>>>>>
He apparently overstayed a visa, not really an "illegal", but >>>>>>>>> "I guess you don't actually care about" women and children
bombed to hell in Gaza, this character in CO was obviously
nuts, violence isn't the answer, but you can expect this kind >>>>>>>>> of wild stuff in reaction to the war, the U.S. backed Israel in >>>>>>>>> it, we're culpable to the destruction.
The moment he "overstayed" he became illegal so
No. He became unlawfully present. No crime was committed.
Yes.
No. No crime was committed.
He can be deported.
But he can't be imprisoned. Deportation is not a criminal
punishment, you fucking moron.
They can be imprisoned awaiting deportation once apprehended.
They can be held, Blowjob. It's not incarceration, which is punishment
for a criminal conviction. Unlawful presence is not a crime, Blowjob.
""Unlawful Presence" Suspect in Boulder attack charged with 118 counts, including attempted murder, assault charges"
I'd call that 118 crimes
""Unlawful Presence" Suspect in Boulder attack charged with 118
counts,
including attempted murder, assault charges"
I'd call that 118 crimes
Not immigration crimes, Blowjob, you stupid *fat* cocksucking cuck.
On Fri, 06 Jun 2025 10:25:59 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On 6/6/25 4:07, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:25:31 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to
deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you
overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here.
How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be
deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others who
cannot be deported?
Just explain how privacy is a factor.
'without encroaching on rights of citizens'.
That does not answer the question.
On Fri, 06 Jun 2025 13:36:38 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On 6/6/25 10:27, Scout wrote:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:101v8b7$2ct8n$5@dont-email.me...
On 6/6/25 4:07, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:25:31 -0700, Siri Cruz
<chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to
deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you
overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here.
How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be
deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others
who
cannot be deported?
Just explain how privacy is a factor.
'without encroaching on rights of citizens'.
So there is no factor.
You have already demanded citizens have no rights.
Huh?
On 06 Jun 2025, Don Shepler <wieber.associate@shitbags.united> posted
some news:Q1M0Q.522524$%uk3.168679@fx10.iad:
[malicious crosspost to os.linux.advocacy by *shitbag* removed]
Blowjob is too stupid to realize his tell. What a fucking idiot!
On 6/6/2025 5:14 PM, Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly obese
convicted child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 06 Jun 2025, AlleyCat <al@aohello.con> posted some
news:Z3K0Q.23102$U3v1.20755@fx07.iad:
[malicious crossposting to comp.os.linux.advocacy by *shitbag*
removed]
Blowjob is too stupid to realize his tell. What a fucking idiot!
On 6/6/2025 2:38 PM, Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly
obese convicted child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 06 Jun 2025, Klaus Schadenfreude <katt@gmail.com> posted some
news:OpG0Q.439219$aGDe.347039@fx13.iad:
[malicious crossposting to comp.os.linux.advocacy by *shitbag*
removed]
On 6/6/2025 10:27 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and
gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled
and lied:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:101v8b7$2ct8n$5@dont- email.me...
On 6/6/25 4:07, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:25:31 -0700, Siri Cruz
<chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to >>>>>>>>>>> deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If >>>>>>>>>>> you overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor >>>>>>>>>>> here.
How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be
deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others >>>>>>>>>> who cannot be deported?
Just explain how privacy is a factor.
'without encroaching on rights of citizens'.
So there is no factor.
So of course there is, scooter, you stupid fuck.
You said a bad word
Too fucking bad, Blowjob, you stupid *fat* cuck.
There you are kicking my fat cuck ass again.
That's right, Blowjob, you stupid *fat* cuck.
Rudy's kicking the living fuck out of me again.
On 6/7/2025 6:02 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jun 2025 10:25:59 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On 6/6/25 4:07, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:25:31 -0700, Siri Cruz
<chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to
deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you
overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here.
How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be
deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others who
cannot be deported?
Just explain how privacy is a factor.
'without encroaching on rights of citizens'.
That does not answer the question.
It does. The methods you want Trump's immigration Gestapo to use in apprehending unlawfully present aliens violate the fourth amendment,
which is a privacy protection. The first through fifth amendments all
are in part privacy protections, but especially the fourth.
On 07 Jun 2025, c186282 <c186282@nada.net> posted some news:M%11Q.746778$%pKb.743729@fx14.iad:
On 6/7/2025 6:05 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jun 2025 13:36:38 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On 6/6/25 10:27, Scout wrote:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:101v8b7$2ct8n$5@dont-email.me...
On 6/6/25 4:07, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:25:31 -0700, Siri Cruz
<chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to >>>>>>>>> deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you >>>>>>>>> overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here. >>>>>>>>How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be
deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others
who
cannot be deported?
Just explain how privacy is a factor.
'without encroaching on rights of citizens'.
So there is no factor.
You have already demanded citizens have no rights.
Huh?
Put the bottle down.
Rudy kicking Kremlin Girl's ass noted.
On 07 Jun 2025, c186282 <c186282@naoda.net> posted some news:G_11Q.746776$%pKb.677737@fx14.iad:
On 6/7/2025 6:02 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jun 2025 10:25:59 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On 6/6/25 4:07, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:25:31 -0700, Siri Cruz
<chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to
deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you
overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here.
How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be
deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others who
cannot be deported?
Just explain how privacy is a factor.
'without encroaching on rights of citizens'.
That does not answer the question.
It does. The methods you want Trump's immigration Gestapo to use in
apprehending unlawfully present aliens violate the fourth amendment,
which is a privacy protection. The first through fifth amendments all
are in part privacy protections, but especially the fourth.
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on in?
How about we give them the same due process that they used to do that?Due process is owed by the regime *only*, Blowjob. I don't owe the criminal Nazi
On 6/7/2025 6:02 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jun 2025 10:25:59 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On 6/6/25 4:07, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:25:31 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to
deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you
overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here.
How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be
deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others who
cannot be deported?
Just explain how privacy is a factor.
'without encroaching on rights of citizens'.
That does not answer the question.
It does. The methods you want Trump's immigration Gestapo to use in apprehending
unlawfully present aliens violate the fourth amendment, which is a privacy >protection. The first through fifth amendments all are in part privacy >protections, but especially the fourth.
On 07 Jun 2025, c186282 <c186282@naoda.net> posted some >news:G_11Q.746776$%pKb.677737@fx14.iad:
On 6/7/2025 6:02 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jun 2025 10:25:59 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On 6/6/25 4:07, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:25:31 -0700, Siri Cruz
<chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to
deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you
overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here.
How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be
deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others who
cannot be deported?
Just explain how privacy is a factor.
'without encroaching on rights of citizens'.
That does not answer the question.
It does. The methods you want Trump's immigration Gestapo to use in
apprehending unlawfully present aliens violate the fourth amendment,
which is a privacy protection. The first through fifth amendments all
are in part privacy protections, but especially the fourth.
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on in? How about
we give them the same due process that they used to do that?
On 6/7/2025 6:05 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jun 2025 13:36:38 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On 6/6/25 10:27, Scout wrote:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:101v8b7$2ct8n$5@dont-email.me...
On 6/6/25 4:07, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:25:31 -0700, Siri Cruz
<chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to
deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you >>>>>>>> overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here.
How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be
deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others
who
cannot be deported?
Just explain how privacy is a factor.
'without encroaching on rights of citizens'.
So there is no factor.
You have already demanded citizens have no rights.
Huh?
Put the bottle down.
Here's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go.It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on in? How about
we give them the same due process that they used to do that?
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
Here's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go.It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on in? How
about we give them the same due process that they used to do that?
You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution in Los
Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he convince juries?
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
Here's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go.It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on in? How
about we give them the same due process that they used to do that?
You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution in Los
Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he convince juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless
they have money.
17 family members of notorious cartel leader
enter U.S. in deal with Trump administration
May 15, 2025
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/sinaloa-cartel-leader-family-enters-us-deal- >trump-administration-mexico/
On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 14:16:22 -0700, c186282 <c186282@naoda.net> wrote:I have fully explained it. You're just being your usual nyah-nyah-nyah self — your standard m.o. You don't like the explanation, even though it is comprehensive.
On 6/7/2025 6:02 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jun 2025 10:25:59 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On 6/6/25 4:07, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:25:31 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> >>>>> wrote:
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to
deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you
overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here.
How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be
deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others who
cannot be deported?
Just explain how privacy is a factor.
'without encroaching on rights of citizens'.
That does not answer the question.
It does. The methods you want Trump's immigration Gestapo to use in apprehending
unlawfully present aliens violate the fourth amendment, which is a privacy >> protection. The first through fifth amendments all are in part privacy
protections, but especially the fourth.
You're merely repeating the same thing but don't explain exactly how
those rights are being violated.
On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 12:08:22 -0700, c186282 <c186282@naoda.net> wrote:
On 6/7/2025 6:03 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 13:27:17 -0400, "Scout"
<me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:101v8b7$2ct8n$5@dont-email.me...
On 6/6/25 4:07, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:25:31 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> >>>>>> wrote:
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to
deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you >>>>>>>> overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here.
How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be
deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others who >>>>>>> cannot be deported?
Just explain how privacy is a factor.
'without encroaching on rights of citizens'.
So there is no factor.
Yep.
Nope.
We have two morons
Why do you criticize others for name-calling when you're the worst offender?
Laughter. You've created your own label and my name-calling is mild
by comparison with most of who is around here.
Provided elsewhere, but one more time: if ANY law enforcement just snatch people
insisting privacy is a factor yet can't seem
to explain how other than that they already explained it.
Fourth amendment.
No explaination provided for your claim.
On Sat, 07 Jun 2025 22:38:03 +0000, AlleyCant <al@aohello.con> wrote:The Trump regime's immigration Gestapo must follow the Constitution and the law in deporting them. You want them not to have to do that. You will lose.
On 07 Jun 2025, c186282 <c186282@naoda.net> posted some
news:G_11Q.746776$%pKb.677737@fx14.iad:
On 6/7/2025 6:02 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jun 2025 10:25:59 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On 6/6/25 4:07, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:25:31 -0700, Siri Cruz
<chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to
deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you
overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here.
How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be
deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others who >>>>>>> cannot be deported?
Just explain how privacy is a factor.
'without encroaching on rights of citizens'.
That does not answer the question.
It does. The methods you want Trump's immigration Gestapo to use in
apprehending unlawfully present aliens violate the fourth amendment,
which is a privacy protection. The first through fifth amendments all
are in part privacy protections, but especially the fourth.
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on in? How about
we give them the same due process that they used to do that?
Here's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go.
On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 14:17:31 -0700, c186282 <c186282@nada.net> wrote:Follow your own advice first and be an example to her.
On 6/7/2025 6:05 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jun 2025 13:36:38 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On 6/6/25 10:27, Scout wrote:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:101v8b7$2ct8n$5@dont-email.me...
On 6/6/25 4:07, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:25:31 -0700, Siri Cruz
<chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to >>>>>>>>> deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you >>>>>>>>> overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here. >>>>>>>>How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be
deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others
who
cannot be deported?
Just explain how privacy is a factor.
'without encroaching on rights of citizens'.
So there is no factor.
You have already demanded citizens have no rights.
Huh?
Put the bottle down.
I tell Siri this daily but he refuses.
On Sun, 08 Jun 2025 13:42:22 +0000, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com>deal-
wrote:
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in >>news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
Here's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go.It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on in? How
about we give them the same due process that they used to do that?
You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution in Los
Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he convince juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless
they have money.
17 family members of notorious cartel leader
enter U.S. in deal with Trump administration
May 15, 2025
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/sinaloa-cartel-leader-family-enters-us-
trump-administration-mexico/
Look up the meaning of "illegals," dummy
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
Here's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go.It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on in? How
about we give them the same due process that they used to do that?
You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution in Los
Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he convince juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless
they have money.
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21:
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
Here's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go.It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on in? How
about we give them the same due process that they used to do that?
You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution in Los
Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he convince juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless
they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free phones, free
housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free tranny
conversions and more. Why don't you try that in Mexico, see what
happens and report back?
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21:
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
Here's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go.It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on in? How
about we give them the same due process that they used to do that?
You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution in Los
Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he convince juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless
they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free phones, free
housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free tranny
conversions and more. Why don't you try that in Mexico, see what
happens and report back?
Curt <curtrr2@89701.net> wrote in news:dcbg5h56kx.1749411259@xsjhi.pl:
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted someYou dickturd keep parroting the same old debunked propaganda
news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21:
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on in? How >>>>>> >about we give them the same due process that they used to do that? >>>>> Here's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go.
You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution in Los
Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he convince juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless
they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free phones, free
housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free tranny
conversions and more. Why don't you try that in Mexico, see what
happens and report back?
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 19:47:15 -0000 (UTC), BaxterHow
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Curt <curtrr2@89701.net> wrote in news:dcbg5h56kx.1749411259@xsjhi.pl:
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some
news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21:
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on in?
that?about we give them the same due process that they used to do
You dickturd keep parroting the same old debunked propagandaHere's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go.
You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution in Los
Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he convince juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless
they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free phones, free
housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free tranny
conversions and more. Why don't you try that in Mexico, see what
happens and report back?
Post the debunking.....
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >news:jn3c4kdilra6semciddh3q7g7k7vaje14j@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 19:47:15 -0000 (UTC), BaxterHow
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Curt <curtrr2@89701.net> wrote in news:dcbg5h56kx.1749411259@xsjhi.pl:
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some
news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21:
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on in?
that?about we give them the same due process that they used to do
You dickturd keep parroting the same old debunked propagandaHere's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go.
You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution in Los
Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he convince juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless
they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free phones, free
housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free tranny
conversions and more. Why don't you try that in Mexico, see what
happens and report back?
Post the debunking.....
Let's start with one claim:
===========
CLAIM: The U.S. government gives immigrants who cross the countrys
border illegally smartphones with unlimited texting and internet access.
APS ASSESSMENT: False. Immigration and Customs Enforcement does give
some immigrants phones. However, they can only access an app called >SmartLink, which is used to monitor immigrants after they cross the
border, according to the agency, the company that makes the phones and an >immigration expert. The devices are not connected to a cellular network
and cannot be used to browse the internet, make unauthorized phone calls,
or access apps other than SmartLink.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-immigrant-phone-internet-texting- >521577996794
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
Here's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go.It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on in? How about >>> >we give them the same due process that they used to do that?
You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution in Los
Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he convince juries?
On Sun, 08 Jun 2025 13:42:22 +0000, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com>
wrote:
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in >>news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
Here's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go.It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on in? How
about we give them the same due process that they used to do that?
You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution in Los
Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he convince juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless
they have money.
17 family members of notorious cartel leader
enter U.S. in deal with Trump administration
May 15, 2025
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/sinaloa-cartel-leader-family-enters-us-deal- >>trump-administration-mexico/
Look up the meaning of "illegals," dummy
On 8/6/25 12:34, Curt wrote:
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some
news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21:
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on in? How >>>>>>> about we give them the same due process that they used to do that? >>>>> Here's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go.
You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution in Los
Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he convince juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless
they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free phones, free
housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free tranny
conversions and more. Why don't you try that in Mexico, see what
happens and report back?
Do you really think people hiding from ICE are risking part of
the protest?
On 6/8/2025 6:11 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 07 Jun 2025 22:38:03 +0000, AlleyCant <al@aohello.con> wrote:The Trump regime's immigration Gestapo must follow the Constitution and the law
On 07 Jun 2025, c186282 <c186282@naoda.net> posted some
news:G_11Q.746776$%pKb.677737@fx14.iad:
On 6/7/2025 6:02 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jun 2025 10:25:59 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> >>>>> wrote:
On 6/6/25 4:07, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:25:31 -0700, Siri Cruz
<chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to >>>>>>>>> deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you >>>>>>>>> overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here.
How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be
deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others who >>>>>>>> cannot be deported?
Just explain how privacy is a factor.
'without encroaching on rights of citizens'.
That does not answer the question.
It does. The methods you want Trump's immigration Gestapo to use in
apprehending unlawfully present aliens violate the fourth amendment,
which is a privacy protection. The first through fifth amendments all
are in part privacy protections, but especially the fourth.
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on in? How about
we give them the same due process that they used to do that?
Here's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go.
in deporting them. You want them not to have to do that. You will lose.
On 6/8/2025 6:13 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 14:17:31 -0700, c186282 <c186282@nada.net> wrote:Follow your own advice first and be an example to her.
On 6/7/2025 6:05 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jun 2025 13:36:38 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On 6/6/25 10:27, Scout wrote:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:101v8b7$2ct8n$5@dont-email.me...
On 6/6/25 4:07, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:25:31 -0700, Siri Cruz
<chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to >>>>>>>>>> deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you >>>>>>>>>> overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here. >>>>>>>>>How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be
deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others >>>>>>>>> who
cannot be deported?
Just explain how privacy is a factor.
'without encroaching on rights of citizens'.
So there is no factor.
You have already demanded citizens have no rights.
Huh?
Put the bottle down.
I tell Siri this daily but he refuses.
On 6/8/2025 6:13 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 12:08:22 -0700, c186282 <c186282@naoda.net> wrote:
On 6/7/2025 6:03 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 13:27:17 -0400, "Scout"
<me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:101v8b7$2ct8n$5@dont-email.me...
On 6/6/25 4:07, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:25:31 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> >>>>>>> wrote:
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to >>>>>>>>> deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you >>>>>>>>> overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here. >>>>>>>>How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be
deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others who >>>>>>>> cannot be deported?
Just explain how privacy is a factor.
'without encroaching on rights of citizens'.
So there is no factor.
Yep.
Nope.
We have two morons
Why do you criticize others for name-calling when you're the worst offender?
Laughter. You've created your own label and my name-calling is mild
by comparison with most of who is around here.
You are the most egregious offender when it comes to name-calling.
Provided elsewhere, but one more time: if ANY law enforcement just snatch people
insisting privacy is a factor yet can't seem
to explain how other than that they already explained it.
Fourth amendment.
No explaination provided for your claim.
off the street without probable cause, which is what you are advocating, that is
unconstitutional. It's impossible that you could not know that, even as >truculent and obtuse as you are.
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 23:34:56 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>news:jn3c4kdilra6semciddh3q7g7k7vaje14j@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 19:47:15 -0000 (UTC), BaxterHow
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Curt <curtrr2@89701.net> wrote in
news:dcbg5h56kx.1749411259@xsjhi.pl:
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some
news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21:
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on in?
that?about we give them the same due process that they used to do
You dickturd keep parroting the same old debunked propagandaHere's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go.
You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution in Los
Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he convince
juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless
they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free phones,
free housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free
tranny conversions and more. Why don't you try that in Mexico,
see what happens and report back?
Post the debunking.....
Let's start with one claim:
===========
CLAIM: The U.S. government gives immigrants who cross the countrys
border illegally smartphones with unlimited texting and internet
access.
APS ASSESSMENT: False. Immigration and Customs Enforcement does give
some immigrants phones. However, they can only access an app called >>SmartLink, which is used to monitor immigrants after they cross the
border, according to the agency, the company that makes the phones and
an immigration expert. The devices are not connected to a cellular
network and cannot be used to browse the internet, make unauthorized
phone calls, or access apps other than SmartLink.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-immigrant-phone-internet-texting- >>521577996794
Good trick.... AP apparently found someone who made that claim, and
made a big deal about it.
It wasn't part of the post you claimed to have been debunked, and now
you've said it was true.
"ICE said the SmartLINK app sends push notifications and reminders for upcoming appointments; provides a database for participants to find
food banks, clothing or other community services; and allows users to
upload and send documents to their case specialists."
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 09:49:28 -0700, c186282 <c186282@nada.net> wrote:
On 6/8/2025 6:13 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 14:17:31 -0700, c186282 <c186282@nada.net> wrote:Follow your own advice first and be an example to her.
On 6/7/2025 6:05 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jun 2025 13:36:38 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> >>>>> wrote:
On 6/6/25 10:27, Scout wrote:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:101v8b7$2ct8n$5@dont-email.me...
On 6/6/25 4:07, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:25:31 -0700, Siri Cruz
<chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to >>>>>>>>>>> deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you >>>>>>>>>>> overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here. >>>>>>>>>>How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be
deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others >>>>>>>>>> who
cannot be deported?
Just explain how privacy is a factor.
'without encroaching on rights of citizens'.
So there is no factor.
You have already demanded citizens have no rights.
Huh?
Put the bottle down.
I tell Siri this daily but he refuses.
I never drink.
Next bit of silliness from you?
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >news:gnuc4ktmeqtv27om90omnh955saohngivq@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 23:34:56 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>news:jn3c4kdilra6semciddh3q7g7k7vaje14j@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 19:47:15 -0000 (UTC), BaxterHow
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Curt <curtrr2@89701.net> wrote in >>>>>news:dcbg5h56kx.1749411259@xsjhi.pl:
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some
news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21:
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on in?
You dickturd keep parroting the same old debunked propagandaHere's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go.about we give them the same due process that they used to do >>>that?
You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution in Los
Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he convince
juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless
they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free phones,
free housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free
tranny conversions and more. Why don't you try that in Mexico,
see what happens and report back?
Post the debunking.....
Let's start with one claim:
===========
CLAIM: The U.S. government gives immigrants who cross the countrys >>>border illegally smartphones with unlimited texting and internet
access.
APS ASSESSMENT: False. Immigration and Customs Enforcement does give >>>some immigrants phones. However, they can only access an app called >>>SmartLink, which is used to monitor immigrants after they cross the >>>border, according to the agency, the company that makes the phones and
an immigration expert. The devices are not connected to a cellular >>>network and cannot be used to browse the internet, make unauthorized >>>phone calls, or access apps other than SmartLink.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-immigrant-phone-internet-texting- >>>521577996794
Good trick.... AP apparently found someone who made that claim, and
made a big deal about it.
It wasn't part of the post you claimed to have been debunked, and now
you've said it was true.
What part of "free phones" did you not understand.
Doesn't negate nor contradict the AP assessment.
"ICE said the SmartLINK app sends push notifications and reminders for
upcoming appointments; provides a database for participants to find
food banks, clothing or other community services; and allows users to
upload and send documents to their case specialists."
And the biggest thing you turdbrains keep deliberately missing is that
yes, some of this stuff is provided LEGAL immigrants, but NOT TO ILLEGAL >immigrants.
As some are starting to point out, conservaturds are claiming ALL
immigrants are "illegal".
==========
Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more
A felon in the White House is making crime legal
Meanwhile, he's creating fake crimes to punish the law abiding.
David R. Lurie
Jun 9
READ IN APP
Trump during a White House event last month. (Andrew Harnik/Getty)
?? Public Notice is possible thanks to paid subscribers. If you
appreciate our fiercely independent coverage of American politics, please >support us by clicking the button and signing up for a paid subscription.
??
?? Subscribe to Public Notice ??
After the Supreme Court declared Donald Trump largely immune from
prosecution for turning the office of the presidency into a criminal >enterprise, and the nations voters then chose to reinstall the freshly >convicted felon in the White House, who could have predicted he would use
his office to punish the law abiding and protect the corrupt?
In fact, both the scale and audaciousness of Trumps corruption, and of
his regimes assault on the criminal justice system, was eminently >predictable.
As House Speaker Mike Johnson recently pointed out, Trumps corruption is >out in the open. The same is true of his use of criminal justice system
and other levers of government as weapons against his ever-growing list
of enemies.
Aaron Rupar @atrupar.com
REPORTER: Do you have any concerns about Trump's business dealings? MIKE >JOHNSON: Whatever President Trump is doing is out in the open. REPORTER:
The memecoin is not transparent. We don't know who those investors are. >JOHNSON: I don't know anything about the memecoin thing.
Wed, 14 May 2025 14:44:47 GMT
View on Bluesky
But even the most cynical have been surprised by the Trumpist effort to >portray the provision of healthcare to children, veterans, and the
elderly as waste and fraud, as well as Trumps effort to render those
who follow the laws into criminals.
The most vulnerable among us, including immigrants and the sick, are >currently among Trumps primary victims. But the entire nation will soon
pay a heavy price for his systematic assault on the rule of law in
service of his bottomless desire for corrupt wealth and self-
aggrandizement.
Retroactive criminalization
During the campaign, Trump and his cronies declared they would deport the >allegedly massive numbers of criminal aliens. When Trump came into
office, however, he faced a problem: The vast majority of undocumented >immigrants are law abiding.
Trumpists, however, came up with an answer: Create fake crimes and
thereby turn the law abiding into criminals.
Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more
A felon in the White House is making crime legal
Meanwhile, he's creating fake crimes to punish the law abiding.
David R. Lurie
Jun 9
READ IN APP
Trump during a White House event last month. (Andrew Harnik/Getty)
?? Public Notice is possible thanks to paid subscribers. If you
appreciate our fiercely independent coverage of American politics, please >support us by clicking the button and signing up for a paid subscription.
??
?? Subscribe to Public Notice ??
After the Supreme Court declared Donald Trump largely immune from
prosecution for turning the office of the presidency into a criminal >enterprise, and the nations voters then chose to reinstall the freshly >convicted felon in the White House, who could have predicted he would use
his office to punish the law abiding and protect the corrupt?
In fact, both the scale and audaciousness of Trumps corruption, and of
his regimes assault on the criminal justice system, was eminently >predictable.
As House Speaker Mike Johnson recently pointed out, Trumps corruption is >out in the open. The same is true of his use of criminal justice system
and other levers of government as weapons against his ever-growing list
of enemies.
Aaron Rupar @atrupar.com
REPORTER: Do you have any concerns about Trump's business dealings? MIKE >JOHNSON: Whatever President Trump is doing is out in the open. REPORTER:
The memecoin is not transparent. We don't know who those investors are. >JOHNSON: I don't know anything about the memecoin thing.
Wed, 14 May 2025 14:44:47 GMT
View on Bluesky
But even the most cynical have been surprised by the Trumpist effort to >portray the provision of healthcare to children, veterans, and the
elderly as waste and fraud, as well as Trumps effort to render those
who follow the laws into criminals.
The most vulnerable among us, including immigrants and the sick, are >currently among Trumps primary victims. But the entire nation will soon
pay a heavy price for his systematic assault on the rule of law in
service of his bottomless desire for corrupt wealth and self-
aggrandizement.
Retroactive criminalization
During the campaign, Trump and his cronies declared they would deport the >allegedly massive numbers of criminal aliens. When Trump came into
office, however, he faced a problem: The vast majority of undocumented >immigrants are law abiding.
Trumpists, however, came up with an answer: Create fake crimes and
thereby turn the law abiding into criminals.
Trump announced the US is under invasion by a foreign power in order to >invoke the rarely used Alien Enemies Act and justify the summary
deportation of supposed gang members to foreign prisons, this despite a
US intelligence report concluding there is no such invasion. Then, when >courts caught the administration deporting migrants who are not gang
members, or in violation of existing immigration laws, Trumpists have >prevaricated and outright lied, transforming their purported law
enforcement initiative into a fraud.
Trumpists have resorted to inventing new offenses so as to transform law- >abiding immigrants into criminals. For example, Trump has declared
slivers of land along the border to be military zones for the sole
purpose of charging migrants with trespassing. The administration has
also declared that undocumented immigrants have an obligation to
register with the government so they can be indicted for failing to do
so. Theyre jailing immigrants who legally entered the United States
under a Biden-era asylum law by retroactively declaring the program to be >illegal.
Most tellingly, and insidiously, ICE agents desperate to meet the
increasing quotas the White House has set for deporting illegals have
taken to targeting the most vulnerable immigrants: Those intent on
following the law and engaging in productive work.
As Sen. Markwayne Mullin put it on CNN yesterday, regardless of what
they may be doing right now including whether they are abiding by the
law and are gainfully employed undocumented persons are illegal and
they are criminals.
On 6/7/2025 6:02 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jun 2025 10:25:59 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On 6/6/25 4:07, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:25:31 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to
deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you
overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here.
How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be
deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others who
cannot be deported?
Just explain how privacy is a factor.
'without encroaching on rights of citizens'.
That does not answer the question.
It does. The methods you want Trump's immigration Gestapo to use in apprehending unlawfully present aliens violate the fourth amendment, which
is a privacy protection. The first through fifth amendments all are in
part privacy protections, but especially the fourth.
Curt <curtrr2@89701.net> wrote in news:dcbg5h56kx.1749411259@xsjhi.pl:
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted someYou dickturd keep parroting the same old debunked propaganda.
news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21:
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on in? How >>>>>> >about we give them the same due process that they used to do that? >>>>> Here's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go.
You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution in Los
Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he convince juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless
they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free phones, free
housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free tranny
conversions and more. Why don't you try that in Mexico, see what
happens and report back?
On 6/8/2025 6:10 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 14:16:22 -0700, c186282 <c186282@naoda.net> wrote:I have fully explained it.
On 6/7/2025 6:02 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jun 2025 10:25:59 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On 6/6/25 4:07, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:25:31 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> >>>>>> wrote:
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to
deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you
overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here.
How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be
deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others who >>>>>>> cannot be deported?
Just explain how privacy is a factor.
'without encroaching on rights of citizens'.
That does not answer the question.
It does. The methods you want Trump's immigration Gestapo to use in
apprehending
unlawfully present aliens violate the fourth amendment, which is a
privacy
protection. The first through fifth amendments all are in part privacy
protections, but especially the fourth.
You're merely repeating the same thing but don't explain exactly how
those rights are being violated.
You're just being your usual nyah-nyah-nyah self —
your standard m.o. You don't like the explanation, even though it is comprehensive.
Let's try one more time before reaching the kill-file event horizon. If Trump's immigration Gestapo just starts yanking people off the street
based on "hunches" that they're unlawfully present
— and this IS what you want to happen —
that violates people's right against unreasonable search and seizure.
It clearly does — that's not in question.
The right against unreasonable search and seizure is a privacy protection — >that's also not in question.
The correct thing for you to do here is to admit that the Gestapo methods
you wish to see implemented are unconstitutional, and then concede.
On 8/6/25 12:34, Curt wrote:
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some
news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21:
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on in? How >>>>>>> about we give them the same due process that they used to do that? >>>>> Here's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go.
You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution in Los
Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he convince juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless
they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free phones, free
housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free tranny
conversions and more. Why don't you try that in Mexico, see what
happens and report back?
Do you really think people hiding from ICE are risking part of the
protest?
On Sun, 08 Jun 2025 06:21:27 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
Here's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go.It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on in? How
about
we give them the same due process that they used to do that?
You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution in Los
Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he convince juries?
I'll ask the question again: What privacy rights are being violated.
On 6/8/2025 6:11 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 07 Jun 2025 22:38:03 +0000, AlleyCant <al@aohello.con> wrote:The Trump regime's immigration Gestapo must follow the Constitution and
On 07 Jun 2025, c186282 <c186282@naoda.net> posted some
news:G_11Q.746776$%pKb.677737@fx14.iad:
On 6/7/2025 6:02 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jun 2025 10:25:59 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> >>>>> wrote:
On 6/6/25 4:07, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:25:31 -0700, Siri Cruz
<chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to >>>>>>>>> deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you >>>>>>>>> overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here.
How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be
deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others who >>>>>>>> cannot be deported?
Just explain how privacy is a factor.
'without encroaching on rights of citizens'.
That does not answer the question.
It does. The methods you want Trump's immigration Gestapo to use in
apprehending unlawfully present aliens violate the fourth amendment,
which is a privacy protection. The first through fifth amendments all
are in part privacy protections, but especially the fourth.
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on in? How about
we give them the same due process that they used to do that?
Here's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go.
the law in deporting them.
You want them not to have to do that.
You will lose.
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 09:57:45 -0700, c186282 <c186282@nada.net> wrote:
On 6/8/2025 6:17 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 07 Jun 2025 09:01:41 -0400, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 08:53:25 -0700, c186282 <c186282@nada.net> wrote:
On 6/6/2025 4:07 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:25:31 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> >>>>>> wrote:
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to
deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you >>>>>>>> overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here.
How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be
deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others who >>>>>>> cannot be deported?
Just explain how privacy is a factor.
I already did.
Link to the message please because no you did not.
<crickets.wav>
This is a really childish and stupid practice of yours to reply to your own post
to bitch and moan about someone not replying to you, ESPECIALLY because I DID
reply to your petulant bitchy demand.
Looks like you're starting to slip out there Rudely.
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 09:49:28 -0700, c186282 <c186282@nada.net> wrote:
On 6/8/2025 6:13 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 14:17:31 -0700, c186282 <c186282@nada.net> wrote:Follow your own advice first and be an example to her.
On 6/7/2025 6:05 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jun 2025 13:36:38 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> >>>>> wrote:
On 6/6/25 10:27, Scout wrote:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:101v8b7$2ct8n$5@dont-email.me...
On 6/6/25 4:07, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:25:31 -0700, Siri Cruz
<chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to >>>>>>>>>>> deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you >>>>>>>>>>> overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here. >>>>>>>>>>How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be
deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others >>>>>>>>>> who
cannot be deported?
Just explain how privacy is a factor.
'without encroaching on rights of citizens'.
So there is no factor.
You have already demanded citizens have no rights.
Huh?
Put the bottle down.
I tell Siri this daily but he refuses.
I never drink.
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 09:44:56 -0700, c186282 <c186282@naoda.net> wrote:
On 6/8/2025 6:11 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 07 Jun 2025 22:38:03 +0000, AlleyCant <al@aohello.con> wrote:The Trump regime's immigration Gestapo must follow the Constitution and the law
On 07 Jun 2025, c186282 <c186282@naoda.net> posted some
news:G_11Q.746776$%pKb.677737@fx14.iad:
On 6/7/2025 6:02 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jun 2025 10:25:59 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> >>>>>> wrote:
On 6/6/25 4:07, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:25:31 -0700, Siri Cruz
<chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to >>>>>>>>>> deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you >>>>>>>>>> overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here. >>>>>>>>>How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be
deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others who >>>>>>>>> cannot be deported?
Just explain how privacy is a factor.
'without encroaching on rights of citizens'.
That does not answer the question.
It does. The methods you want Trump's immigration Gestapo to use in
apprehending unlawfully present aliens violate the fourth amendment, >>>>> which is a privacy protection. The first through fifth amendments all >>>>> are in part privacy protections, but especially the fourth.
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on in? How about >>>> we give them the same due process that they used to do that?
Here's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go.
in deporting them. You want them not to have to do that. You will lose.
What privacy rights are being violated.
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 09:48:33 -0700, c186282 <c186282@naoda.net> wrote:
On 6/8/2025 6:13 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 12:08:22 -0700, c186282 <c186282@naoda.net> wrote:
On 6/7/2025 6:03 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 13:27:17 -0400, "Scout"
<me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:101v8b7$2ct8n$5@dont-email.me...
On 6/6/25 4:07, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:25:31 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> >>>>>>>> wrote:
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to >>>>>>>>>> deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you >>>>>>>>>> overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here. >>>>>>>>>How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be
deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others who >>>>>>>>> cannot be deported?
Just explain how privacy is a factor.
'without encroaching on rights of citizens'.
So there is no factor.
Yep.
Nope.
We have two morons
Why do you criticize others for name-calling when you're the worst offender?
Laughter. You've created your own label and my name-calling is mild
by comparison with most of who is around here.
You are the most egregious offender when it comes to name-calling.
Repeating your nonsense claim doesn't make it true.
Provided elsewhere, but one more time: if ANY law enforcement just snatch people
insisting privacy is a factor yet can't seem
to explain how other than that they already explained it.
Fourth amendment.
No explaination provided for your claim.
off the street without probable cause, which is what you are advocating, that is
unconstitutional. It's impossible that you could not know that, even as
truculent and obtuse as you are.
First of all, citation required that is happening.
Secondly, you STILL haven't answered the question about how the "right
to privacy" is being violatied.
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 15:15:20 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>news:gnuc4ktmeqtv27om90omnh955saohngivq@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 23:34:56 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>news:jn3c4kdilra6semciddh3q7g7k7vaje14j@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 19:47:15 -0000 (UTC), BaxterHow
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Curt <curtrr2@89701.net> wrote in >>>>>>news:dcbg5h56kx.1749411259@xsjhi.pl:
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some
news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21:
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on >>>>>>>>>>> >in?
that?about we give them the same due process that they used to >>>>>>>>>>> >do
You dickturd keep parroting the same old debunked propagandaHere's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go.
You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution in Los >>>>>>>>> Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he convince
juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless
they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free phones,
free housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free
tranny conversions and more. Why don't you try that in Mexico,
see what happens and report back?
Post the debunking.....
Let's start with one claim:
===========
CLAIM: The U.S. government gives immigrants who cross the countrys >>>>border illegally smartphones with unlimited texting and internet >>>>access.
APS ASSESSMENT: False. Immigration and Customs Enforcement does
give some immigrants phones. However, they can only access an app >>>>called SmartLink, which is used to monitor immigrants after they
cross the border, according to the agency, the company that makes
the phones and an immigration expert. The devices are not connected
to a cellular network and cannot be used to browse the internet,
make unauthorized phone calls, or access apps other than SmartLink.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-immigrant-phone-internet-textin >>>>g- 521577996794
Good trick.... AP apparently found someone who made that claim, and
made a big deal about it.
It wasn't part of the post you claimed to have been debunked, and
now you've said it was true.
What part of "free phones" did you not understand.
Doesn't negate nor contradict the AP assessment.
"ICE said the SmartLINK app sends push notifications and reminders
for upcoming appointments; provides a database for participants to
find food banks, clothing or other community services; and allows
users to upload and send documents to their case specialists."
Which not only doesn't "debunk" the claim that illegals got free
phones, it asserts that it's true. Do you have any more "debunking."
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1024r9i$1npn$1@dont-email.me...
On 8/6/25 12:34, Curt wrote:
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some
news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21:
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
Here's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go.It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on in?
How about we give them the same due process that they used to
do that?
You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution in Los
Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he convince juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless
they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free phones, free
housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free tranny
conversions and more. Why don't you try that in Mexico, see what
happens and report back?
Do you really think people hiding from ICE are risking part of the
protest?
Wouldn't be the first time someone thought being in a crowd would make
them immune to arrest.
Everyone in a riot.. is thinking that. Doesn't always work out.
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 09:49:28 -0700, c186282 <c186282@nada.net> wrote:
On 6/8/2025 6:13 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 14:17:31 -0700, c186282 <c186282@nada.net> wrote:Follow your own advice first and be an example to her.
On 6/7/2025 6:05 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jun 2025 13:36:38 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> >>>>> wrote:
On 6/6/25 10:27, Scout wrote:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:101v8b7$2ct8n$5@dont-email.me...
On 6/6/25 4:07, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:25:31 -0700, Siri Cruz
<chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to >>>>>>>>>>> deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you >>>>>>>>>>> overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here. >>>>>>>>>>How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be
deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others >>>>>>>>>> who
cannot be deported?
Just explain how privacy is a factor.
'without encroaching on rights of citizens'.
So there is no factor.
You have already demanded citizens have no rights.
Huh?
Put the bottle down.
I tell Siri this daily but he refuses.
I never drink.
Next bit of silliness from you?
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in news:kv1e4k58j47f4o3q6gegnr97h1u1pb7kmb@4ax.com:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 15:15:20 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>news:gnuc4ktmeqtv27om90omnh955saohngivq@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 23:34:56 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>news:jn3c4kdilra6semciddh3q7g7k7vaje14j@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 19:47:15 -0000 (UTC), BaxterHow
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Curt <curtrr2@89701.net> wrote in >>>>>>news:dcbg5h56kx.1749411259@xsjhi.pl:
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some
news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21:
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on >>>>>>>>>>> >in?
that?about we give them the same due process that they used to >>>>>>>>>>> >do
You dickturd keep parroting the same old debunked propagandaHere's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go.
You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution in Los >>>>>>>>> Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he convince
juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless
they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free phones, >>>>>>> free housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free
tranny conversions and more. Why don't you try that in Mexico, >>>>>>> see what happens and report back?
Post the debunking.....
Let's start with one claim:
===========
CLAIM: The U.S. government gives immigrants who cross the country?s >>>>border illegally smartphones with unlimited texting and internet >>>>access.
AP?S ASSESSMENT: False. Immigration and Customs Enforcement does
give some immigrants phones. However, they can only access an app >>>>called SmartLink, which is used to monitor immigrants after they >>>>cross the border, according to the agency, the company that makes
the phones and an immigration expert. The devices are not connected >>>>to a cellular network and cannot be used to browse the internet,
make unauthorized phone calls, or access apps other than SmartLink.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-immigrant-phone-internet-textin >>>>g- 521577996794
Good trick.... AP apparently found someone who made that claim, and
made a big deal about it.
It wasn't part of the post you claimed to have been debunked, and
now you've said it was true.
What part of "free phones" did you not understand.
Doesn't negate nor contradict the AP assessment.
"ICE said the SmartLINK app sends push notifications and reminders
for upcoming appointments; provides a database for participants to
find food banks, clothing or other community services; and allows
users to upload and send documents to their case specialists."
Which not only doesn't "debunk" the claim that illegals got free
phones, it asserts that it's true. Do you have any more "debunking."
The claim by conservaturds about "free phones" is fully functional commercially available phones - not the limited bricks that are given applicants that are legally in the immigration system.
illegal immigrants do NOT get "money, free health care, free phones, free housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free tranny
conversions and more." Some refugees, legal immigrants, legal asylum
seekers do get SOME of those benefits under certain conditions - but none
go to illegal immigrants.
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >news:kv1e4k58j47f4o3q6gegnr97h1u1pb7kmb@4ax.com:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 15:15:20 -0000 (UTC), BaxterThe claim by conservaturds about "free phones" is fully functional >commercially available phones - not the limited bricks that are given >applicants that are legally in the immigration system.
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>news:gnuc4ktmeqtv27om90omnh955saohngivq@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 23:34:56 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>news:jn3c4kdilra6semciddh3q7g7k7vaje14j@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 19:47:15 -0000 (UTC), BaxterHow
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Curt <curtrr2@89701.net> wrote in >>>>>>>news:dcbg5h56kx.1749411259@xsjhi.pl:
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some
news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21:
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on >>>>>>>>>>>> >in?
that?about we give them the same due process that they used to >>>>>>>>>>>> >do
You dickturd keep parroting the same old debunked propagandaHere's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go.
You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution in Los >>>>>>>>>> Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he convince
juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless
they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free phones, >>>>>>>> free housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free
tranny conversions and more. Why don't you try that in Mexico, >>>>>>>> see what happens and report back?
Post the debunking.....
Let's start with one claim:
===========
CLAIM: The U.S. government gives immigrants who cross the countrys >>>>>border illegally smartphones with unlimited texting and internet >>>>>access.
APS ASSESSMENT: False. Immigration and Customs Enforcement does
give some immigrants phones. However, they can only access an app >>>>>called SmartLink, which is used to monitor immigrants after they >>>>>cross the border, according to the agency, the company that makes
the phones and an immigration expert. The devices are not connected >>>>>to a cellular network and cannot be used to browse the internet,
make unauthorized phone calls, or access apps other than SmartLink.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-immigrant-phone-internet-textin >>>>>g- 521577996794
Good trick.... AP apparently found someone who made that claim, and
made a big deal about it.
It wasn't part of the post you claimed to have been debunked, and
now you've said it was true.
What part of "free phones" did you not understand.
Doesn't negate nor contradict the AP assessment.
"ICE said the SmartLINK app sends push notifications and reminders
for upcoming appointments; provides a database for participants to
find food banks, clothing or other community services; and allows
users to upload and send documents to their case specialists."
Which not only doesn't "debunk" the claim that illegals got free
phones, it asserts that it's true. Do you have any more "debunking."
illegal immigrants do NOT get "money, free health care, free phones, free >housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free tranny
conversions and more." Some refugees, legal immigrants, legal asylum
seekers do get SOME of those benefits under certain conditions - but none
go to illegal immigrants.
On 09 Jun 2025, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
posted some news:10275gq$lla8$15@dont-email.me:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1024r9i$1npn$1@dont-email.me...
On 8/6/25 12:34, Curt wrote:
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some
news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21:
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
Here's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go.It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on in? >>>>>>>>> How about we give them the same due process that they used to >>>>>>>>> do that?
You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution in Los
Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he convince juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless
they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free phones, free
housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free tranny
conversions and more. Why don't you try that in Mexico, see what
happens and report back?
Do you really think people hiding from ICE are risking part of the
protest?
Wouldn't be the first time someone thought being in a crowd would make
them immune to arrest.
Everyone in a riot.. is thinking that. Doesn't always work out.
It does in California apparently The illegals have more rights there
than natural citizens.
"c186282" <c186282@naoda.net> wrote in message news:G_11Q.746776$%pKb.677737@fx14.iad...
On 6/7/2025 6:02 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jun 2025 10:25:59 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On 6/6/25 4:07, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:25:31 -0700, Siri Cruz
<chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to
deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you
overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here.
How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be
deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others who
cannot be deported?
Just explain how privacy is a factor.
'without encroaching on rights of citizens'.
That does not answer the question.
It does. The methods you want Trump's immigration Gestapo to use in
apprehending unlawfully present aliens violate the fourth amendment,
which is a privacy protection. The first through fifth amendments all
are in part privacy protections, but especially the fourth.
Which just kicks the can down the road, You still have not explained
how privacy is a factor.
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 20:03:52 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>news:kv1e4k58j47f4o3q6gegnr97h1u1pb7kmb@4ax.com:You said that claims of giving phones to illegals had been debunked.
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 15:15:20 -0000 (UTC), BaxterThe claim by conservaturds about "free phones" is fully functional >>commercially available phones - not the limited bricks that are given >>applicants that are legally in the immigration system.
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>news:gnuc4ktmeqtv27om90omnh955saohngivq@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 23:34:56 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>news:jn3c4kdilra6semciddh3q7g7k7vaje14j@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 19:47:15 -0000 (UTC), BaxterHow
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Curt <curtrr2@89701.net> wrote in >>>>>>>>news:dcbg5h56kx.1749411259@xsjhi.pl:
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some >>>>>>>>> news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21:
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on >>>>>>>>>>>>> >in?
that?about we give them the same due process that they used to >>>>>>>>>>>>> >do
You dickturd keep parroting the same old debunked propagandaHere's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go. >>>>>>>>>>>You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution in Los >>>>>>>>>>> Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he convince >>>>>>>>>>> juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless
they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free phones, >>>>>>>>> free housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free >>>>>>>>> tranny conversions and more. Why don't you try that in
Mexico, see what happens and report back?
Post the debunking.....
Let's start with one claim:
===========
CLAIM: The U.S. government gives immigrants who cross the
countrys border illegally smartphones with unlimited texting and >>>>>>internet access.
APS ASSESSMENT: False. Immigration and Customs Enforcement does >>>>>>give some immigrants phones. However, they can only access an app >>>>>>called SmartLink, which is used to monitor immigrants after they >>>>>>cross the border, according to the agency, the company that makes >>>>>>the phones and an immigration expert. The devices are not
connected to a cellular network and cannot be used to browse the >>>>>>internet, make unauthorized phone calls, or access apps other than >>>>>>SmartLink.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-immigrant-phone-internet-text >>>>>>in g- 521577996794
Good trick.... AP apparently found someone who made that claim,
and made a big deal about it.
It wasn't part of the post you claimed to have been debunked, and
now you've said it was true.
What part of "free phones" did you not understand.
Doesn't negate nor contradict the AP assessment.
"ICE said the SmartLINK app sends push notifications and reminders
for upcoming appointments; provides a database for participants to
find food banks, clothing or other community services; and allows
users to upload and send documents to their case specialists."
Which not only doesn't "debunk" the claim that illegals got free
phones, it asserts that it's true. Do you have any more
"debunking."
The claim was not about commercially available phones.
illegal immigrants do NOT get "money, free health care, free phones,
free housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free tranny >>conversions and more." Some refugees, legal immigrants, legal asylum >>seekers do get SOME of those benefits under certain conditions - but
none go to illegal immigrants.
So the "debunking" is just you repeating leftist talking points.
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in news:gnuc4ktmeqtv27om90omnh955saohngivq@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 23:34:56 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>news:jn3c4kdilra6semciddh3q7g7k7vaje14j@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 19:47:15 -0000 (UTC), BaxterHow
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Curt <curtrr2@89701.net> wrote in >>>>>news:dcbg5h56kx.1749411259@xsjhi.pl:
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some
news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21:
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on in?
You dickturd keep parroting the same old debunked propagandaHere's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go.about we give them the same due process that they used to do >>>that?
You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution in Los
Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he convince
juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless
they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free phones,
free housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free
tranny conversions and more. Why don't you try that in Mexico,
see what happens and report back?
Post the debunking.....
Let's start with one claim:
===========
CLAIM: The U.S. government gives immigrants who cross the country’s >>>border illegally smartphones with unlimited texting and internet
access.
AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. Immigration and Customs Enforcement does give >>>some immigrants phones. However, they can only access an app called >>>SmartLink, which is used to monitor immigrants after they cross the >>>border, according to the agency, the company that makes the phones
and an immigration expert. The devices are not connected to a
cellular network and cannot be used to browse the internet, make >>>unauthorized phone calls, or access apps other than SmartLink.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-immigrant-phone-internet-texting
- 521577996794
Good trick.... AP apparently found someone who made that claim, and
made a big deal about it.
It wasn't part of the post you claimed to have been debunked, and now
you've said it was true.
What part of "free phones" did you not understand.
Doesn't negate nor contradict the AP assessment.
"ICE said the SmartLINK app sends push notifications and reminders
for upcoming appointments; provides a database for participants to
find food banks, clothing or other community services; and allows
users to upload and send documents to their case specialists."
And the biggest thing you turdbrains keep deliberately missing is that
yes, some of this stuff is provided LEGAL immigrants, but NOT TO
ILLEGAL immigrants.
As some are starting to point out, conservaturds are claiming ALL
immigrants are "illegal".
==========
Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more
A felon in the White House is making crime legal
Meanwhile, he's creating fake crimes to punish the law abiding.
David R. Lurie
Jun 9
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >news:v8le4kdj2mecbopt88edlueghbj2sktqu8@4ax.com:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 20:03:52 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>news:kv1e4k58j47f4o3q6gegnr97h1u1pb7kmb@4ax.com:You said that claims of giving phones to illegals had been debunked.
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 15:15:20 -0000 (UTC), BaxterThe claim by conservaturds about "free phones" is fully functional >>>commercially available phones - not the limited bricks that are given >>>applicants that are legally in the immigration system.
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>news:gnuc4ktmeqtv27om90omnh955saohngivq@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 23:34:56 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>news:jn3c4kdilra6semciddh3q7g7k7vaje14j@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 19:47:15 -0000 (UTC), BaxterHow
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Curt <curtrr2@89701.net> wrote in >>>>>>>>>news:dcbg5h56kx.1749411259@xsjhi.pl:
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some >>>>>>>>>> news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21:
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >in?
that?about we give them the same due process that they used to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >do
You dickturd keep parroting the same old debunked propagandaHere's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go. >>>>>>>>>>>>You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution in Los >>>>>>>>>>>> Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he convince >>>>>>>>>>>> juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless
they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free phones, >>>>>>>>>> free housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free >>>>>>>>>> tranny conversions and more. Why don't you try that in
Mexico, see what happens and report back?
Post the debunking.....
Let's start with one claim:
===========
CLAIM: The U.S. government gives immigrants who cross the >>>>>>>countrys border illegally smartphones with unlimited texting and >>>>>>>internet access.
APS ASSESSMENT: False. Immigration and Customs Enforcement does >>>>>>>give some immigrants phones. However, they can only access an app >>>>>>>called SmartLink, which is used to monitor immigrants after they >>>>>>>cross the border, according to the agency, the company that makes >>>>>>>the phones and an immigration expert. The devices are not >>>>>>>connected to a cellular network and cannot be used to browse the >>>>>>>internet, make unauthorized phone calls, or access apps other than >>>>>>>SmartLink.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-immigrant-phone-internet-text >>>>>>>in g- 521577996794
Good trick.... AP apparently found someone who made that claim,
and made a big deal about it.
It wasn't part of the post you claimed to have been debunked, and
now you've said it was true.
What part of "free phones" did you not understand.
Doesn't negate nor contradict the AP assessment.
"ICE said the SmartLINK app sends push notifications and reminders >>>>>> for upcoming appointments; provides a database for participants to >>>>>> find food banks, clothing or other community services; and allows
users to upload and send documents to their case specialists."
Which not only doesn't "debunk" the claim that illegals got free
phones, it asserts that it's true. Do you have any more
"debunking."
The claim was not about commercially available phones.
If they had those phones, they were NOT "illegals" - they were in the
System.
You see ALL immigrants as "illegal".
illegal immigrants do NOT get "money, free health care, free phones,
free housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free tranny >>>conversions and more." Some refugees, legal immigrants, legal asylum >>>seekers do get SOME of those benefits under certain conditions - but
none go to illegal immigrants.
So the "debunking" is just you repeating leftist talking points.
Welcome to Occupied America.
On 6/9/2025 4:07 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 09:44:56 -0700, c186282 <c186282@naoda.net> wrote:
On 6/8/2025 6:11 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 07 Jun 2025 22:38:03 +0000, AlleyCant <al@aohello.con> wrote:The Trump regime's immigration Gestapo must follow the Constitution and the law
On 07 Jun 2025, c186282 <c186282@naoda.net> posted some
news:G_11Q.746776$%pKb.677737@fx14.iad:
On 6/7/2025 6:02 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jun 2025 10:25:59 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> >>>>>>> wrote:
On 6/6/25 4:07, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:25:31 -0700, Siri Cruz
<chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to >>>>>>>>>>> deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you >>>>>>>>>>> overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here. >>>>>>>>>>How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be
deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others who >>>>>>>>>> cannot be deported?
Just explain how privacy is a factor.
'without encroaching on rights of citizens'.
That does not answer the question.
It does. The methods you want Trump's immigration Gestapo to use in >>>>>> apprehending unlawfully present aliens violate the fourth amendment, >>>>>> which is a privacy protection. The first through fifth amendments all >>>>>> are in part privacy protections, but especially the fourth.
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on in? How about >>>>> we give them the same due process that they used to do that?
Here's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go.
in deporting them. You want them not to have to do that. You will lose.
What privacy rights are being violated.
Asked and answered.
On 6/9/2025 4:11 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 09:49:28 -0700, c186282 <c186282@nada.net> wrote:
On 6/8/2025 6:13 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 14:17:31 -0700, c186282 <c186282@nada.net> wrote:Follow your own advice first and be an example to her.
On 6/7/2025 6:05 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jun 2025 13:36:38 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> >>>>>> wrote:
On 6/6/25 10:27, Scout wrote:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:101v8b7$2ct8n$5@dont-email.me...
On 6/6/25 4:07, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:25:31 -0700, Siri Cruz
<chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to >>>>>>>>>>>> deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you >>>>>>>>>>>> overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here. >>>>>>>>>>>How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be >>>>>>>>>>> deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others >>>>>>>>>>> who
cannot be deported?
Just explain how privacy is a factor.
'without encroaching on rights of citizens'.
So there is no factor.
You have already demanded citizens have no rights.
Huh?
Put the bottle down.
I tell Siri this daily but he refuses.
I never drink.
Then it's either drugs or severe mental illness. Either way, you need some help.
On 6/9/2025 4:10 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 09:48:33 -0700, c186282 <c186282@naoda.net> wrote:
On 6/8/2025 6:13 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 12:08:22 -0700, c186282 <c186282@naoda.net> wrote:
On 6/7/2025 6:03 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 13:27:17 -0400, "Scout"
<me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:101v8b7$2ct8n$5@dont-email.me...
On 6/6/25 4:07, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:25:31 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to >>>>>>>>>>> deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you >>>>>>>>>>> overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here. >>>>>>>>>>How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be
deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others who >>>>>>>>>> cannot be deported?
Just explain how privacy is a factor.
'without encroaching on rights of citizens'.
So there is no factor.
Yep.
Nope.
We have two morons
Why do you criticize others for name-calling when you're the worst offender?
Laughter. You've created your own label and my name-calling is mild
by comparison with most of who is around here.
You are the most egregious offender when it comes to name-calling.
Repeating your nonsense claim doesn't make it true.
It is true all the same. It's not true "because" I repeat it rather, I repeat
it because it's true.
Provided elsewhere, but one more time: if ANY law enforcement just snatch people
insisting privacy is a factor yet can't seem
to explain how other than that they already explained it.
Fourth amendment.
No explaination provided for your claim.
off the street without probable cause, which is what you are advocating, that is
unconstitutional. It's impossible that you could not know that, even as
truculent and obtuse as you are.
First of all, citation required that is happening.
No citation is required. It is all over the news.
Secondly, you STILL haven't answered the question about how the "right
to privacy" is being violatied.
I have explained it several times. You're just ignoring the explanations, as usual.
On 9/6/25 4:11, NoBody wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 09:49:28 -0700, c186282 <c186282@nada.net> wrote:
On 6/8/2025 6:13 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 14:17:31 -0700, c186282 <c186282@nada.net> wrote:Follow your own advice first and be an example to her.
On 6/7/2025 6:05 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jun 2025 13:36:38 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> >>>>>> wrote:
On 6/6/25 10:27, Scout wrote:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:101v8b7$2ct8n$5@dont-email.me...
On 6/6/25 4:07, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:25:31 -0700, Siri Cruz
<chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to >>>>>>>>>>>> deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you >>>>>>>>>>>> overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here. >>>>>>>>>>>How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be >>>>>>>>>>> deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others >>>>>>>>>>> who
cannot be deported?
Just explain how privacy is a factor.
'without encroaching on rights of citizens'.
So there is no factor.
You have already demanded citizens have no rights.
Huh?
Put the bottle down.
I tell Siri this daily but he refuses.
I never drink.
Next bit of silliness from you?
You act this way sober?
On 6/9/2025 4:14 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 09:57:45 -0700, c186282 <c186282@nada.net> wrote:
On 6/8/2025 6:17 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 07 Jun 2025 09:01:41 -0400, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>>>
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 08:53:25 -0700, c186282 <c186282@nada.net> wrote: >>>>>
On 6/6/2025 4:07 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:25:31 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> >>>>>>> wrote:
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to >>>>>>>>> deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you >>>>>>>>> overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here. >>>>>>>>How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be
deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others who >>>>>>>> cannot be deported?
Just explain how privacy is a factor.
I already did.
Link to the message please because no you did not.
<crickets.wav>
This is a really childish and stupid practice of yours to reply to your own post
to bitch and moan about someone not replying to you, ESPECIALLY because I DID
reply to your petulant bitchy demand.
Looks like you're starting to slip out there Rudely.
Evasion noted.
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 02:32:43 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:to
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>news:v8le4kdj2mecbopt88edlueghbj2sktqu8@4ax.com:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 20:03:52 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>news:kv1e4k58j47f4o3q6gegnr97h1u1pb7kmb@4ax.com:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 15:15:20 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>news:gnuc4ktmeqtv27om90omnh955saohngivq@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 23:34:56 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>>news:jn3c4kdilra6semciddh3q7g7k7vaje14j@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 19:47:15 -0000 (UTC), BaxterHow
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Curt <curtrr2@89701.net> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>news:dcbg5h56kx.1749411259@xsjhi.pl:
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some >>>>>>>>>>> news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21:
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >in?
about we give them the same due process that they used
Losthat?do
Here's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go. >>>>>>>>>>>>>You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution in
phones,Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he convince >>>>>>>>>>>>> juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless
they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free
thanPost the debunking.....free housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free >>>>>>>>>>> tranny conversions and more. Why don't you try that inYou dickturd keep parroting the same old debunked propaganda >>>>>>>>>
Mexico, see what happens and report back?
Let's start with one claim:
===========
CLAIM: The U.S. government gives immigrants who cross the >>>>>>>>countrys border illegally smartphones with unlimited texting and >>>>>>>>internet access.
APS ASSESSMENT: False. Immigration and Customs Enforcement does >>>>>>>>give some immigrants phones. However, they can only access an app >>>>>>>>called SmartLink, which is used to monitor immigrants after they >>>>>>>>cross the border, according to the agency, the company that makes >>>>>>>>the phones and an immigration expert. The devices are not >>>>>>>>connected to a cellular network and cannot be used to browse the >>>>>>>>internet, make unauthorized phone calls, or access apps other
textSmartLink.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-immigrant-phone-internet-
remindersin g- 521577996794
Good trick.... AP apparently found someone who made that claim, >>>>>>> and made a big deal about it.
It wasn't part of the post you claimed to have been debunked, and >>>>>>> now you've said it was true.
What part of "free phones" did you not understand.
"ICE said the SmartLINK app sends push notifications and
tofor upcoming appointments; provides a database for participants
You said that claims of giving phones to illegals had been debunked.The claim by conservaturds about "free phones" is fully functional >>>>commercially available phones - not the limited bricks that are given >>>>applicants that are legally in the immigration system.find food banks, clothing or other community services; and allows >>>>>>> users to upload and send documents to their case specialists."Doesn't negate nor contradict the AP assessment.
Which not only doesn't "debunk" the claim that illegals got free
phones, it asserts that it's true. Do you have any more
"debunking."
The claim was not about commercially available phones.
If they had those phones, they were NOT "illegals" - they were in the >>System.
You see ALL immigrants as "illegal".
illegal immigrants do NOT get "money, free health care, free phones, >>>>free housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free tranny >>>>conversions and more." Some refugees, legal immigrants, legal asylum >>>>seekers do get SOME of those benefits under certain conditions - but >>>>none go to illegal immigrants.
So the "debunking" is just you repeating leftist talking points.
Welcome to Occupied America.
Leftist losers, unable to defend their agenda, will often resort to
making unsubstantiated nonsense claims about their opponents.
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >news:crrf4kljc700km8mef5neja8lbk2e99kil@4ax.com:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 02:32:43 -0000 (UTC), Baxterto
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>news:v8le4kdj2mecbopt88edlueghbj2sktqu8@4ax.com:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 20:03:52 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>news:kv1e4k58j47f4o3q6gegnr97h1u1pb7kmb@4ax.com:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 15:15:20 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>news:gnuc4ktmeqtv27om90omnh955saohngivq@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 23:34:56 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>>>news:jn3c4kdilra6semciddh3q7g7k7vaje14j@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 19:47:15 -0000 (UTC), BaxterHow
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Curt <curtrr2@89701.net> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>news:dcbg5h56kx.1749411259@xsjhi.pl:
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some >>>>>>>>>>>> news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21:
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >in?
about we give them the same due process that they used
Losthat?do
Here's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution in
phones,Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he convince >>>>>>>>>>>>>> juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless
they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free
thanPost the debunking.....free housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free >>>>>>>>>>>> tranny conversions and more. Why don't you try that in >>>>>>>>>>>> Mexico, see what happens and report back?You dickturd keep parroting the same old debunked propaganda >>>>>>>>>>
Let's start with one claim:
===========
CLAIM: The U.S. government gives immigrants who cross the >>>>>>>>>countrys border illegally smartphones with unlimited texting and >>>>>>>>>internet access.
APS ASSESSMENT: False. Immigration and Customs Enforcement does >>>>>>>>>give some immigrants phones. However, they can only access an app >>>>>>>>>called SmartLink, which is used to monitor immigrants after they >>>>>>>>>cross the border, according to the agency, the company that makes >>>>>>>>>the phones and an immigration expert. The devices are not >>>>>>>>>connected to a cellular network and cannot be used to browse the >>>>>>>>>internet, make unauthorized phone calls, or access apps other
textSmartLink.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-immigrant-phone-internet-
remindersin g- 521577996794
Good trick.... AP apparently found someone who made that claim, >>>>>>>> and made a big deal about it.
It wasn't part of the post you claimed to have been debunked, and >>>>>>>> now you've said it was true.
What part of "free phones" did you not understand.
"ICE said the SmartLINK app sends push notifications and
tofor upcoming appointments; provides a database for participants
================You said that claims of giving phones to illegals had been debunked.The claim by conservaturds about "free phones" is fully functional >>>>>commercially available phones - not the limited bricks that are given >>>>>applicants that are legally in the immigration system.find food banks, clothing or other community services; and allows >>>>>>>> users to upload and send documents to their case specialists." >>>>>>>>Doesn't negate nor contradict the AP assessment.
Which not only doesn't "debunk" the claim that illegals got free
phones, it asserts that it's true. Do you have any more
"debunking."
The claim was not about commercially available phones.
If they had those phones, they were NOT "illegals" - they were in the >>>System.
You see ALL immigrants as "illegal".
illegal immigrants do NOT get "money, free health care, free phones, >>>>>free housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free tranny >>>>>conversions and more." Some refugees, legal immigrants, legal asylum >>>>>seekers do get SOME of those benefits under certain conditions - but >>>>>none go to illegal immigrants.
So the "debunking" is just you repeating leftist talking points.
Welcome to Occupied America.
Leftist losers, unable to defend their agenda, will often resort to
making unsubstantiated nonsense claims about their opponents.
All undocumented immigrants are "criminals," Trump administration says
https://www.axios.com/2025/01/28/trump-immigrants-criminals-white-house- >briefing
==============
All Undocumented Immigrants Are 'Criminals,' Says White House on ICE >Deportations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZp8jwENxss
On 09 Jun 2025, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> posted some news:1026tq7$jqav$1@dont-email.me:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:gnuc4ktmeqtv27om90omnh955saohngivq@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 23:34:56 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:jn3c4kdilra6semciddh3q7g7k7vaje14j@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 19:47:15 -0000 (UTC), BaxterHow
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Curt <curtrr2@89701.net> wrote in
news:dcbg5h56kx.1749411259@xsjhi.pl:
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some
news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21:
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on in?
that?about we give them the same due process that they used to do
You dickturd keep parroting the same old debunked propagandaHere's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go.
You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution in Los >>>>>>>>> Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he convince
juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless
they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free phones,
free housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free
tranny conversions and more. Why don't you try that in Mexico,
see what happens and report back?
Post the debunking.....
Let's start with one claim:
===========
CLAIM: The U.S. government gives immigrants who cross the country’s
border illegally smartphones with unlimited texting and internet
access.
AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. Immigration and Customs Enforcement does give >>>> some immigrants phones. However, they can only access an app called
SmartLink, which is used to monitor immigrants after they cross the
border, according to the agency, the company that makes the phones
and an immigration expert. The devices are not connected to a
cellular network and cannot be used to browse the internet, make
unauthorized phone calls, or access apps other than SmartLink.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-immigrant-phone-internet-texting >>>> - 521577996794
Good trick.... AP apparently found someone who made that claim, and
made a big deal about it.
It wasn't part of the post you claimed to have been debunked, and now
you've said it was true.
What part of "free phones" did you not understand.
Doesn't negate nor contradict the AP assessment.
"ICE said the SmartLINK app sends push notifications and reminders
for upcoming appointments; provides a database for participants to
find food banks, clothing or other community services; and allows
users to upload and send documents to their case specialists."
And the biggest thing you turdbrains keep deliberately missing is that
yes, some of this stuff is provided LEGAL immigrants, but NOT TO
ILLEGAL immigrants.
As some are starting to point out, conservaturds are claiming ALL
immigrants are "illegal".
==========
Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more
A felon in the White House is making crime legal
Meanwhile, he's creating fake crimes to punish the law abiding.
David R. Lurie
Jun 9
Lurie is a well documented nut and
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 11:29:39 -0700, c186282 <c186282@naoda.net> wrote:
On 6/9/2025 4:11 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 09:49:28 -0700, c186282 <c186282@nada.net> wrote:
On 6/8/2025 6:13 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 14:17:31 -0700, c186282 <c186282@nada.net> wrote: >>>>>Follow your own advice first and be an example to her.
On 6/7/2025 6:05 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jun 2025 13:36:38 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> >>>>>>> wrote:
On 6/6/25 10:27, Scout wrote:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:101v8b7$2ct8n$5@dont-email.me...
On 6/6/25 4:07, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:25:31 -0700, Siri Cruz
<chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to >>>>>>>>>>>>> deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you >>>>>>>>>>>>> overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here. >>>>>>>>>>>>How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be >>>>>>>>>>>> deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others >>>>>>>>>>>> who
cannot be deported?
Just explain how privacy is a factor.
'without encroaching on rights of citizens'.
So there is no factor.
You have already demanded citizens have no rights.
Huh?
Put the bottle down.
I tell Siri this daily but he refuses.
I never drink.
Then it's either drugs or severe mental illness. Either way, you need some help.
Laughter.
You have delusions that you posted something
but it's myself that needs the help?
We seem to be spending a lot of time with you claiming you posted
something
yet you refuse to either link to that message
nor repost the content.
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 11:28:23 -0700, c186282 <c186282@naoda.net> wrote:
On 6/9/2025 4:14 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 09:57:45 -0700, c186282 <c186282@nada.net> wrote:
On 6/8/2025 6:17 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 07 Jun 2025 09:01:41 -0400, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>>>>
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 08:53:25 -0700, c186282 <c186282@nada.net> wrote: >>>>>>
On 6/6/2025 4:07 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:25:31 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> >>>>>>>> wrote:
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to >>>>>>>>>> deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you >>>>>>>>>> overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here. >>>>>>>>>How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be
deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others who >>>>>>>>> cannot be deported?
Just explain how privacy is a factor.
I already did.
Link to the message please because no you did not.
<crickets.wav>
This is a really childish and stupid practice of yours to reply to your own post
to bitch and moan about someone not replying to you, ESPECIALLY because I DID
reply to your petulant bitchy demand.
Looks like you're starting to slip out there Rudely.
Evasion noted.
Tacit admission noted.
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 15:03:57 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>news:crrf4kljc700km8mef5neja8lbk2e99kil@4ax.com:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 02:32:43 -0000 (UTC), Baxterto
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>news:v8le4kdj2mecbopt88edlueghbj2sktqu8@4ax.com:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 20:03:52 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>news:kv1e4k58j47f4o3q6gegnr97h1u1pb7kmb@4ax.com:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 15:15:20 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>>news:gnuc4ktmeqtv27om90omnh955saohngivq@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 23:34:56 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>news:jn3c4kdilra6semciddh3q7g7k7vaje14j@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 19:47:15 -0000 (UTC), BaxterHow
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Curt <curtrr2@89701.net> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>news:dcbg5h56kx.1749411259@xsjhi.pl:
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted >>>>>>>>>>>>> some news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21:
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >on in?
about we give them the same due process that they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >used
Losthat?do
Here's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution in
phones,Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> convince juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless
they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free
thanPost the debunking.....free housing, free education, free food, free clothing, >>>>>>>>>>>>> free tranny conversions and more. Why don't you try that >>>>>>>>>>>>> in Mexico, see what happens and report back?You dickturd keep parroting the same old debunked propaganda >>>>>>>>>>>
Let's start with one claim:
===========
CLAIM: The U.S. government gives immigrants who cross the >>>>>>>>>>countrys border illegally smartphones with unlimited texting >>>>>>>>>>and internet access.
APS ASSESSMENT: False. Immigration and Customs Enforcement >>>>>>>>>>does give some immigrants phones. However, they can only >>>>>>>>>>access an app called SmartLink, which is used to monitor >>>>>>>>>>immigrants after they cross the border, according to the >>>>>>>>>>agency, the company that makes the phones and an immigration >>>>>>>>>>expert. The devices are not connected to a cellular network >>>>>>>>>>and cannot be used to browse the internet, make unauthorized >>>>>>>>>>phone calls, or access apps other
remindersSmartLink.
in g- 521577996794https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-immigrant-phone-internet- >>text
Good trick.... AP apparently found someone who made that
claim, and made a big deal about it.
It wasn't part of the post you claimed to have been debunked, >>>>>>>>> and now you've said it was true.
What part of "free phones" did you not understand.
"ICE said the SmartLINK app sends push notifications and
tofor upcoming appointments; provides a database for
participants
================You said that claims of giving phones to illegals had beenThe claim by conservaturds about "free phones" is fully functional >>>>>>commercially available phones - not the limited bricks that are >>>>>>given applicants that are legally in the immigration system.find food banks, clothing or other community services; andDoesn't negate nor contradict the AP assessment.
allows users to upload and send documents to their case
specialists."
Which not only doesn't "debunk" the claim that illegals got free >>>>>>> phones, it asserts that it's true. Do you have any more
"debunking."
debunked. The claim was not about commercially available phones.
If they had those phones, they were NOT "illegals" - they were in
the System.
You see ALL immigrants as "illegal".
illegal immigrants do NOT get "money, free health care, free >>>>>>phones, free housing, free education, free food, free clothing, >>>>>>free tranny conversions and more." Some refugees, legal >>>>>>immigrants, legal asylum seekers do get SOME of those benefits >>>>>>under certain conditions - but none go to illegal immigrants.
So the "debunking" is just you repeating leftist talking points.
Welcome to Occupied America.
Leftist losers, unable to defend their agenda, will often resort to
making unsubstantiated nonsense claims about their opponents.
All undocumented immigrants are "criminals," Trump administration says
https://www.axios.com/2025/01/28/trump-immigrants-criminals-white-house
- briefing
Which is true, of course.
==============
All Undocumented Immigrants Are 'Criminals,' Says White House on ICE >>Deportations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZp8jwENxss
Yes, they are, Dummy
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in news:crrf4kljc700km8mef5neja8lbk2e99kil@4ax.com:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 02:32:43 -0000 (UTC), Baxterto
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>news:v8le4kdj2mecbopt88edlueghbj2sktqu8@4ax.com:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 20:03:52 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>news:kv1e4k58j47f4o3q6gegnr97h1u1pb7kmb@4ax.com:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 15:15:20 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>news:gnuc4ktmeqtv27om90omnh955saohngivq@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 23:34:56 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>>>news:jn3c4kdilra6semciddh3q7g7k7vaje14j@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 19:47:15 -0000 (UTC), BaxterHow
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Curt <curtrr2@89701.net> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>news:dcbg5h56kx.1749411259@xsjhi.pl:
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some >>>>>>>>>>>> news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21:
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >in?
about we give them the same due process that they used
Losthat?do
Here's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution in
phones,Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he convince >>>>>>>>>>>>>> juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless
they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free
thanPost the debunking.....free housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free >>>>>>>>>>>> tranny conversions and more. Why don't you try that in >>>>>>>>>>>> Mexico, see what happens and report back?You dickturd keep parroting the same old debunked propaganda >>>>>>>>>>
Let's start with one claim:
===========
CLAIM: The U.S. government gives immigrants who cross the >>>>>>>>>countrys border illegally smartphones with unlimited texting and >>>>>>>>>internet access.
APS ASSESSMENT: False. Immigration and Customs Enforcement does >>>>>>>>>give some immigrants phones. However, they can only access an app >>>>>>>>>called SmartLink, which is used to monitor immigrants after they >>>>>>>>>cross the border, according to the agency, the company that makes >>>>>>>>>the phones and an immigration expert. The devices are not >>>>>>>>>connected to a cellular network and cannot be used to browse the >>>>>>>>>internet, make unauthorized phone calls, or access apps other
textSmartLink.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-immigrant-phone-internet-
remindersin g- 521577996794
Good trick.... AP apparently found someone who made that claim, >>>>>>>> and made a big deal about it.
It wasn't part of the post you claimed to have been debunked, and >>>>>>>> now you've said it was true.
What part of "free phones" did you not understand.
"ICE said the SmartLINK app sends push notifications and
tofor upcoming appointments; provides a database for participants
================You said that claims of giving phones to illegals had been debunked.The claim by conservaturds about "free phones" is fully functional >>>>>commercially available phones - not the limited bricks that are given >>>>>applicants that are legally in the immigration system.find food banks, clothing or other community services; and allows >>>>>>>> users to upload and send documents to their case specialists." >>>>>>>>Doesn't negate nor contradict the AP assessment.
Which not only doesn't "debunk" the claim that illegals got free
phones, it asserts that it's true. Do you have any more
"debunking."
The claim was not about commercially available phones.
If they had those phones, they were NOT "illegals" - they were in the >>>System.
You see ALL immigrants as "illegal".
illegal immigrants do NOT get "money, free health care, free phones, >>>>>free housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free tranny >>>>>conversions and more." Some refugees, legal immigrants, legal asylum >>>>>seekers do get SOME of those benefits under certain conditions - but >>>>>none go to illegal immigrants.
So the "debunking" is just you repeating leftist talking points.
Welcome to Occupied America.
Leftist losers, unable to defend their agenda, will often resort to
making unsubstantiated nonsense claims about their opponents.
All undocumented immigrants are "criminals," Trump administration says
https://www.axios.com/2025/01/28/trump-immigrants-criminals-white-house- briefing
==============
All Undocumented Immigrants Are 'Criminals,' Says White House on ICE Deportations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZp8jwENxss
Baxter wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote inillegal entry there are policies and processes ,
news:05jg4k18d3nh7ssu9psud4k5t087oqmarp@4ax.com:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 15:03:57 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:crrf4kljc700km8mef5neja8lbk2e99kil@4ax.com:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 02:32:43 -0000 (UTC), Baxterto
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:v8le4kdj2mecbopt88edlueghbj2sktqu8@4ax.com:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 20:03:52 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>> news:kv1e4k58j47f4o3q6gegnr97h1u1pb7kmb@4ax.com:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 15:15:20 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote >>>>>>>>>> in news:gnuc4ktmeqtv27om90omnh955saohngivq@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 23:34:56 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>> in news:jn3c4kdilra6semciddh3q7g7k7vaje14j@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 19:47:15 -0000 (UTC), BaxterHow
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Curt <curtrr2@89701.net> wrote in
news:dcbg5h56kx.1749411259@xsjhi.pl:
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21:
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stroll on in?
about we give them the same due process that they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used
Losthat?do
Here's their rights: if they are illegal, out they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> go.
You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
phones,Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> convince juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless
they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free
thanfree housing, free education, free food, free clothing, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> free tranny conversions and more. Why don't you try >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that in Mexico, see what happens and report back? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You dickturd keep parroting the same old debunked
propaganda
Post the debunking.....
Let's start with one claim:
===========
CLAIM: The U.S. government gives immigrants who cross the >>>>>>>>>>>> country’s border illegally smartphones with unlimited >>>>>>>>>>>> texting and internet access.
AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement does give some immigrants phones. However, they >>>>>>>>>>>> can only access an app called SmartLink, which is used to >>>>>>>>>>>> monitor immigrants after they cross the border, according >>>>>>>>>>>> to the agency, the company that makes the phones and an >>>>>>>>>>>> immigration expert. The devices are not connected to a >>>>>>>>>>>> cellular network and cannot be used to browse the internet, >>>>>>>>>>>> make unauthorized phone calls, or access apps other
textSmartLink.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-immigrant-phone-intern >>>>>>>>>>>> et-
remindersin g- 521577996794
Good trick.... AP apparently found someone who made that >>>>>>>>>>> claim, and made a big deal about it.
It wasn't part of the post you claimed to have been
debunked, and now you've said it was true.
What part of "free phones" did you not understand.
"ICE said the SmartLINK app sends push notifications and
tofor upcoming appointments; provides a database for
participants
================You said that claims of giving phones to illegals had beenThe claim by conservaturds about "free phones" is fullyfind food banks, clothing or other community services; and >>>>>>>>>>> allows users to upload and send documents to their caseDoesn't negate nor contradict the AP assessment.
specialists."
Which not only doesn't "debunk" the claim that illegals got
free phones, it asserts that it's true. Do you have any more >>>>>>>>> "debunking."
functional commercially available phones - not the limited
bricks that are given applicants that are legally in the
immigration system.
debunked. The claim was not about commercially available phones.
If they had those phones, they were NOT "illegals" - they were in
the System.
You see ALL immigrants as "illegal".
illegal immigrants do NOT get "money, free health care, free
phones, free housing, free education, free food, free clothing, >>>>>>>> free tranny conversions and more." Some refugees, legal
immigrants, legal asylum seekers do get SOME of those benefits >>>>>>>> under certain conditions - but none go to illegal immigrants.
So the "debunking" is just you repeating leftist talking points. >>>>>>>
Welcome to Occupied America.
Leftist losers, unable to defend their agenda, will often resort
to making unsubstantiated nonsense claims about their opponents.
All undocumented immigrants are "criminals," Trump administration
says
https://www.axios.com/2025/01/28/trump-immigrants-criminals-white-ho
use - briefing
Which is true, of course.
==============
All Undocumented Immigrants Are 'Criminals,' Says White House on
ICE Deportations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZp8jwENxss
Yes, they are, Dummy
What is their crime?
follow the procedures and you'll have no problem
Baxter wrote:
% <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote inthat's what was voted for did you vote
news:cf6dnR22U_6ZHtX1nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com:
Baxter wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote inillegal entry there are policies and processes ,
news:05jg4k18d3nh7ssu9psud4k5t087oqmarp@4ax.com:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 15:03:57 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:crrf4kljc700km8mef5neja8lbk2e99kil@4ax.com:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 02:32:43 -0000 (UTC), Baxterto
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>> news:v8le4kdj2mecbopt88edlueghbj2sktqu8@4ax.com:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 20:03:52 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote >>>>>>>>>> in news:kv1e4k58j47f4o3q6gegnr97h1u1pb7kmb@4ax.com:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 15:15:20 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>> in news:gnuc4ktmeqtv27om90omnh955saohngivq@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 23:34:56 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote in news:jn3c4kdilra6semciddh3q7g7k7vaje14j@4ax.com: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 19:47:15 -0000 (UTC), BaxterHow
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Curt <curtrr2@89701.net> wrote in
news:dcbg5h56kx.1749411259@xsjhi.pl:
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> posted some news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stroll on in?
about we give them the same due process that they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used
Losthat?do
Here's their rights: if they are illegal, out they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> go.
You can get a chance to try ignoring the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Constitution in
phones,Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> convince juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free
thanfree housing, free education, free food, free >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clothing, free tranny conversions and more. Why don't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you try that in Mexico, see what happens and report >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> back?You dickturd keep parroting the same old debunked >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propaganda
Post the debunking.....
Let's start with one claim:
===========
CLAIM: The U.S. government gives immigrants who cross the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> country’s border illegally smartphones with >>>>>>>>>>>>>> unlimited texting and internet access.
AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. Immigration and Customs >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Enforcement does give some immigrants phones. However, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> they can only access an app called SmartLink, which is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> used to monitor immigrants after they cross the border, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> according to the agency, the company that makes the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> phones and an immigration expert. The devices are not >>>>>>>>>>>>>> connected to a cellular network and cannot be used to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> browse the internet, make unauthorized phone calls, or >>>>>>>>>>>>>> access apps other
textSmartLink.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-immigrant-phone-inte >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rn et-
remindersin g- 521577996794
Good trick.... AP apparently found someone who made that >>>>>>>>>>>>> claim, and made a big deal about it.
It wasn't part of the post you claimed to have been
debunked, and now you've said it was true.
What part of "free phones" did you not understand.
"ICE said the SmartLINK app sends push notifications and
tofor upcoming appointments; provides a database for
participants
================You said that claims of giving phones to illegals had beenThe claim by conservaturds about "free phones" is fullyfind food banks, clothing or other community services; and >>>>>>>>>>>>> allows users to upload and send documents to their case >>>>>>>>>>>>> specialists."Doesn't negate nor contradict the AP assessment.
Which not only doesn't "debunk" the claim that illegals got >>>>>>>>>>> free phones, it asserts that it's true. Do you have any >>>>>>>>>>> more "debunking."
functional commercially available phones - not the limited >>>>>>>>>> bricks that are given applicants that are legally in the
immigration system.
debunked. The claim was not about commercially available
phones.
If they had those phones, they were NOT "illegals" - they were >>>>>>>> in the System.
You see ALL immigrants as "illegal".
illegal immigrants do NOT get "money, free health care, free >>>>>>>>>> phones, free housing, free education, free food, free
clothing, free tranny conversions and more." Some refugees, >>>>>>>>>> legal immigrants, legal asylum seekers do get SOME of those >>>>>>>>>> benefits under certain conditions - but none go to illegal >>>>>>>>>> immigrants.
So the "debunking" is just you repeating leftist talking
points.
Welcome to Occupied America.
Leftist losers, unable to defend their agenda, will often resort >>>>>>> to making unsubstantiated nonsense claims about their opponents. >>>>>>>
All undocumented immigrants are "criminals," Trump administration
says
https://www.axios.com/2025/01/28/trump-immigrants-criminals-white- >>>>>> ho use - briefing
Which is true, of course.
==============
All Undocumented Immigrants Are 'Criminals,' Says White House on
ICE Deportations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZp8jwENxss
Yes, they are, Dummy
What is their crime?
follow the procedures and you'll have no problem
Most of the migrants they are deporting entered legally and are
following all the rules about reporting/etc. They are deporting very
few actual criminals.
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >news:05jg4k18d3nh7ssu9psud4k5t087oqmarp@4ax.com:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 15:03:57 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>news:crrf4kljc700km8mef5neja8lbk2e99kil@4ax.com:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 02:32:43 -0000 (UTC), Baxterto
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>news:v8le4kdj2mecbopt88edlueghbj2sktqu8@4ax.com:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 20:03:52 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>news:kv1e4k58j47f4o3q6gegnr97h1u1pb7kmb@4ax.com:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 15:15:20 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>>>news:gnuc4ktmeqtv27om90omnh955saohngivq@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 23:34:56 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>news:jn3c4kdilra6semciddh3q7g7k7vaje14j@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 19:47:15 -0000 (UTC), BaxterHow
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Curt <curtrr2@89701.net> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>news:dcbg5h56kx.1749411259@xsjhi.pl:
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted >>>>>>>>>>>>>> some news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21:
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >on in?
about we give them the same due process that they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >used
thanthat?do
Post the debunking.....You dickturd keep parroting the same old debunked propaganda >>>>>>>>>>>>Here's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution in >>>Los
Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> convince juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless
they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free >>>phones,
free housing, free education, free food, free clothing, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> free tranny conversions and more. Why don't you try that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in Mexico, see what happens and report back?
Let's start with one claim:
===========
CLAIM: The U.S. government gives immigrants who cross the >>>>>>>>>>>countrys border illegally smartphones with unlimited texting >>>>>>>>>>>and internet access.
APS ASSESSMENT: False. Immigration and Customs Enforcement >>>>>>>>>>>does give some immigrants phones. However, they can only >>>>>>>>>>>access an app called SmartLink, which is used to monitor >>>>>>>>>>>immigrants after they cross the border, according to the >>>>>>>>>>>agency, the company that makes the phones and an immigration >>>>>>>>>>>expert. The devices are not connected to a cellular network >>>>>>>>>>>and cannot be used to browse the internet, make unauthorized >>>>>>>>>>>phone calls, or access apps other
toSmartLink.
in g- 521577996794https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-immigrant-phone-internet- >>>text
Good trick.... AP apparently found someone who made that
claim, and made a big deal about it.
It wasn't part of the post you claimed to have been debunked, >>>>>>>>>> and now you've said it was true.
What part of "free phones" did you not understand.
"ICE said the SmartLINK app sends push notifications and >>>reminders
for upcoming appointments; provides a database for
participants
================You said that claims of giving phones to illegals had beenThe claim by conservaturds about "free phones" is fully functional >>>>>>>commercially available phones - not the limited bricks that are >>>>>>>given applicants that are legally in the immigration system.find food banks, clothing or other community services; and >>>>>>>>>> allows users to upload and send documents to their caseDoesn't negate nor contradict the AP assessment.
specialists."
Which not only doesn't "debunk" the claim that illegals got free >>>>>>>> phones, it asserts that it's true. Do you have any more
"debunking."
debunked. The claim was not about commercially available phones.
If they had those phones, they were NOT "illegals" - they were in
the System.
You see ALL immigrants as "illegal".
illegal immigrants do NOT get "money, free health care, free >>>>>>>phones, free housing, free education, free food, free clothing, >>>>>>>free tranny conversions and more." Some refugees, legal >>>>>>>immigrants, legal asylum seekers do get SOME of those benefits >>>>>>>under certain conditions - but none go to illegal immigrants.
So the "debunking" is just you repeating leftist talking points.
Welcome to Occupied America.
Leftist losers, unable to defend their agenda, will often resort to
making unsubstantiated nonsense claims about their opponents.
All undocumented immigrants are "criminals," Trump administration says
https://www.axios.com/2025/01/28/trump-immigrants-criminals-white-house
- briefing
Which is true, of course.
==============
All Undocumented Immigrants Are 'Criminals,' Says White House on ICE >>>Deportations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZp8jwENxss
Yes, they are, Dummy
What is their crime?
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in news:crrf4kljc700km8mef5neja8lbk2e99kil@4ax.com:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 02:32:43 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
toLeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>news:v8le4kdj2mecbopt88edlueghbj2sktqu8@4ax.com:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 20:03:52 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>news:kv1e4k58j47f4o3q6gegnr97h1u1pb7kmb@4ax.com:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 15:15:20 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>news:gnuc4ktmeqtv27om90omnh955saohngivq@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 23:34:56 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>>news:jn3c4kdilra6semciddh3q7g7k7vaje14j@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 19:47:15 -0000 (UTC), BaxterHow
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Curt <curtrr2@89701.net> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>news:dcbg5h56kx.1749411259@xsjhi.pl:
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some >>>>>>>>>>> news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21:
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >in?
about we give them the same due process that they used
Losthat?do
Here's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go. >>>>>>>>>>>>>You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution in
phones,Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he convince >>>>>>>>>>>>> juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless
they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free
thanPost the debunking.....free housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free >>>>>>>>>>> tranny conversions and more. Why don't you try that in >>>>>>>>>>> Mexico, see what happens and report back?You dickturd keep parroting the same old debunked propaganda >>>>>>>>>
Let's start with one claim:
===========
CLAIM: The U.S. government gives immigrants who cross the >>>>>>>>country?s border illegally smartphones with unlimited texting and >>>>>>>>internet access.
AP?S ASSESSMENT: False. Immigration and Customs Enforcement does >>>>>>>>give some immigrants phones. However, they can only access an app >>>>>>>>called SmartLink, which is used to monitor immigrants after they >>>>>>>>cross the border, according to the agency, the company that makes >>>>>>>>the phones and an immigration expert. The devices are not >>>>>>>>connected to a cellular network and cannot be used to browse the >>>>>>>>internet, make unauthorized phone calls, or access apps other
textSmartLink.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-immigrant-phone-internet-
remindersin g- 521577996794
Good trick.... AP apparently found someone who made that claim, >>>>>>> and made a big deal about it.
It wasn't part of the post you claimed to have been debunked, and >>>>>>> now you've said it was true.
What part of "free phones" did you not understand.
"ICE said the SmartLINK app sends push notifications and
tofor upcoming appointments; provides a database for participants
You said that claims of giving phones to illegals had been debunked.The claim by conservaturds about "free phones" is fully functional >>>>commercially available phones - not the limited bricks that are given >>>>applicants that are legally in the immigration system.find food banks, clothing or other community services; and allows >>>>>>> users to upload and send documents to their case specialists." >>>>>>>Doesn't negate nor contradict the AP assessment.
Which not only doesn't "debunk" the claim that illegals got free
phones, it asserts that it's true. Do you have any more
"debunking."
The claim was not about commercially available phones.
If they had those phones, they were NOT "illegals" - they were in the >>System.
You see ALL immigrants as "illegal".
illegal immigrants do NOT get "money, free health care, free phones, >>>>free housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free tranny >>>>conversions and more." Some refugees, legal immigrants, legal asylum >>>>seekers do get SOME of those benefits under certain conditions - but >>>>none go to illegal immigrants.
So the "debunking" is just you repeating leftist talking points.
Welcome to Occupied America.
Leftist losers, unable to defend their agenda, will often resort to
making unsubstantiated nonsense claims about their opponents.
================
All undocumented immigrants are "criminals," Trump administration says
https://www.axios.com/2025/01/28/trump-immigrants-criminals-white-house- briefing
==============
All Undocumented Immigrants Are 'Criminals,' Says White House on ICE Deportations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZp8jwENxss
% <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote in news:cf6dnR22U_6ZHtX1nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com:
Baxter wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote inillegal entry there are policies and processes ,
news:05jg4k18d3nh7ssu9psud4k5t087oqmarp@4ax.com:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 15:03:57 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:crrf4kljc700km8mef5neja8lbk2e99kil@4ax.com:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 02:32:43 -0000 (UTC), Baxterto
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:v8le4kdj2mecbopt88edlueghbj2sktqu8@4ax.com:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 20:03:52 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>> news:kv1e4k58j47f4o3q6gegnr97h1u1pb7kmb@4ax.com:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 15:15:20 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote >>>>>>>>>> in news:gnuc4ktmeqtv27om90omnh955saohngivq@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 23:34:56 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>> in news:jn3c4kdilra6semciddh3q7g7k7vaje14j@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 19:47:15 -0000 (UTC), BaxterHow
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Curt <curtrr2@89701.net> wrote in
news:dcbg5h56kx.1749411259@xsjhi.pl:
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stroll on in?
about we give them the same due process that they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used
Losthat?do
Here's their rights: if they are illegal, out they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> go.
You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
phones,Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> convince juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free
thanfree housing, free education, free food, free clothing, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> free tranny conversions and more. Why don't you try >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that in Mexico, see what happens and report back? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You dickturd keep parroting the same old debunked >>>>>>>>>>>>>> propaganda
Post the debunking.....
Let's start with one claim:
===========
CLAIM: The U.S. government gives immigrants who cross the >>>>>>>>>>>> country?s border illegally smartphones with unlimited >>>>>>>>>>>> texting and internet access.
AP?S ASSESSMENT: False. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement does give some immigrants phones. However, they >>>>>>>>>>>> can only access an app called SmartLink, which is used to >>>>>>>>>>>> monitor immigrants after they cross the border, according >>>>>>>>>>>> to the agency, the company that makes the phones and an >>>>>>>>>>>> immigration expert. The devices are not connected to a >>>>>>>>>>>> cellular network and cannot be used to browse the internet, >>>>>>>>>>>> make unauthorized phone calls, or access apps other
textSmartLink.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-immigrant-phone-intern >>>>>>>>>>>> et-
remindersin g- 521577996794
Good trick.... AP apparently found someone who made that >>>>>>>>>>> claim, and made a big deal about it.
It wasn't part of the post you claimed to have been
debunked, and now you've said it was true.
What part of "free phones" did you not understand.
"ICE said the SmartLINK app sends push notifications and
tofor upcoming appointments; provides a database for
participants
================If they had those phones, they were NOT "illegals" - they were in >>>>>> the System.You said that claims of giving phones to illegals had beenThe claim by conservaturds about "free phones" is fullyfind food banks, clothing or other community services; and >>>>>>>>>>> allows users to upload and send documents to their case >>>>>>>>>>> specialists."Doesn't negate nor contradict the AP assessment.
Which not only doesn't "debunk" the claim that illegals got >>>>>>>>> free phones, it asserts that it's true. Do you have any more >>>>>>>>> "debunking."
functional commercially available phones - not the limited
bricks that are given applicants that are legally in the
immigration system.
debunked. The claim was not about commercially available phones. >>>>>>
You see ALL immigrants as "illegal".
illegal immigrants do NOT get "money, free health care, free >>>>>>>> phones, free housing, free education, free food, free clothing, >>>>>>>> free tranny conversions and more." Some refugees, legal
immigrants, legal asylum seekers do get SOME of those benefits >>>>>>>> under certain conditions - but none go to illegal immigrants. >>>>>>>>
So the "debunking" is just you repeating leftist talking points. >>>>>>>
Welcome to Occupied America.
Leftist losers, unable to defend their agenda, will often resort
to making unsubstantiated nonsense claims about their opponents.
All undocumented immigrants are "criminals," Trump administration
says
https://www.axios.com/2025/01/28/trump-immigrants-criminals-white-ho >>>> use - briefing
Which is true, of course.
==============
All Undocumented Immigrants Are 'Criminals,' Says White House on
ICE Deportations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZp8jwENxss
Yes, they are, Dummy
What is their crime?
follow the procedures and you'll have no problem
Most of the migrants they are deporting entered legally and are following
all the rules about reporting/etc. They are deporting very few actual criminals.
% <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote in news:hgKdnW7fCpxDFtX1nZ2dnZfqnPUAAAAA@giganews.com:
Baxter wrote:
% <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote inthat's what was voted for did you vote
news:cf6dnR22U_6ZHtX1nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com:
Baxter wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote inillegal entry there are policies and processes ,
news:05jg4k18d3nh7ssu9psud4k5t087oqmarp@4ax.com:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 15:03:57 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:crrf4kljc700km8mef5neja8lbk2e99kil@4ax.com:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 02:32:43 -0000 (UTC), Baxterto
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>> news:v8le4kdj2mecbopt88edlueghbj2sktqu8@4ax.com:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 20:03:52 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote >>>>>>>>>> in news:kv1e4k58j47f4o3q6gegnr97h1u1pb7kmb@4ax.com:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 15:15:20 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>> in news:gnuc4ktmeqtv27om90omnh955saohngivq@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 23:34:56 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote in news:jn3c4kdilra6semciddh3q7g7k7vaje14j@4ax.com: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 19:47:15 -0000 (UTC), Baxter >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:How
Curt <curtrr2@89701.net> wrote in
news:dcbg5h56kx.1749411259@xsjhi.pl:
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> posted some news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stroll on in?
about we give them the same due process that they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used
Losthat?do
Here's their rights: if they are illegal, out they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> go.
You can get a chance to try ignoring the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Constitution in
thanYou dickturd keep parroting the same old debunked >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propagandaAngeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> convince juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free >>>>>> phones,
free housing, free education, free food, free >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clothing, free tranny conversions and more. Why don't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you try that in Mexico, see what happens and report >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> back?
Post the debunking.....
Let's start with one claim:
===========
CLAIM: The U.S. government gives immigrants who cross the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> countryâ??s border illegally smartphones with >>>>>>>>>>>>>> unlimited texting and internet access.
APâ??S ASSESSMENT: False. Immigration and Customs >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Enforcement does give some immigrants phones. However, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> they can only access an app called SmartLink, which is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> used to monitor immigrants after they cross the border, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> according to the agency, the company that makes the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> phones and an immigration expert. The devices are not >>>>>>>>>>>>>> connected to a cellular network and cannot be used to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> browse the internet, make unauthorized phone calls, or >>>>>>>>>>>>>> access apps other
textSmartLink.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-immigrant-phone-inte >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rn et-
remindersin g- 521577996794
Good trick.... AP apparently found someone who made that >>>>>>>>>>>>> claim, and made a big deal about it.
It wasn't part of the post you claimed to have been >>>>>>>>>>>>> debunked, and now you've said it was true.
What part of "free phones" did you not understand.
"ICE said the SmartLINK app sends push notifications and
tofor upcoming appointments; provides a database for >>>>>>>>>>>>> participants
================You said that claims of giving phones to illegals had been >>>>>>>>> debunked. The claim was not about commercially availableThe claim by conservaturds about "free phones" is fullyfind food banks, clothing or other community services; and >>>>>>>>>>>>> allows users to upload and send documents to their case >>>>>>>>>>>>> specialists."Doesn't negate nor contradict the AP assessment.
Which not only doesn't "debunk" the claim that illegals got >>>>>>>>>>> free phones, it asserts that it's true. Do you have any >>>>>>>>>>> more "debunking."
functional commercially available phones - not the limited >>>>>>>>>> bricks that are given applicants that are legally in the >>>>>>>>>> immigration system.
phones.
If they had those phones, they were NOT "illegals" - they were >>>>>>>> in the System.
You see ALL immigrants as "illegal".
illegal immigrants do NOT get "money, free health care, free >>>>>>>>>> phones, free housing, free education, free food, free
clothing, free tranny conversions and more." Some refugees, >>>>>>>>>> legal immigrants, legal asylum seekers do get SOME of those >>>>>>>>>> benefits under certain conditions - but none go to illegal >>>>>>>>>> immigrants.
So the "debunking" is just you repeating leftist talking
points.
Welcome to Occupied America.
Leftist losers, unable to defend their agenda, will often resort >>>>>>> to making unsubstantiated nonsense claims about their opponents. >>>>>>>
All undocumented immigrants are "criminals," Trump administration >>>>>> says
https://www.axios.com/2025/01/28/trump-immigrants-criminals-white- >>>>>> ho use - briefing
Which is true, of course.
==============
All Undocumented Immigrants Are 'Criminals,' Says White House on >>>>>> ICE Deportations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZp8jwENxss
Yes, they are, Dummy
What is their crime?
follow the procedures and you'll have no problem
Most of the migrants they are deporting entered legally and are
following all the rules about reporting/etc. They are deporting very
few actual criminals.
That's what conservaturds voted for - not me, I voted for sanity and Law.
Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <1029hgs$1ab8q$1@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:crrf4kljc700km8mef5neja8lbk2e99kil@4ax.com:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 02:32:43 -0000 (UTC), Baxterto
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:v8le4kdj2mecbopt88edlueghbj2sktqu8@4ax.com:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 20:03:52 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:kv1e4k58j47f4o3q6gegnr97h1u1pb7kmb@4ax.com:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 15:15:20 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>> news:gnuc4ktmeqtv27om90omnh955saohngivq@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 23:34:56 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>>>> news:jn3c4kdilra6semciddh3q7g7k7vaje14j@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 19:47:15 -0000 (UTC), BaxterHow
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Curt <curtrr2@89701.net> wrote in
news:dcbg5h56kx.1749411259@xsjhi.pl:
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21:
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in?
about we give them the same due process that they used
Losthat?do
Here's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution in
phones,Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he convince >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless
they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free
thanPost the debunking.....free housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free >>>>>>>>>>>>> tranny conversions and more. Why don't you try that in >>>>>>>>>>>>> Mexico, see what happens and report back?You dickturd keep parroting the same old debunked propaganda >>>>>>>>>>>
Let's start with one claim:
===========
CLAIM: The U.S. government gives immigrants who cross the >>>>>>>>>> country?s border illegally smartphones with unlimited texting and >>>>>>>>>> internet access.
AP?S ASSESSMENT: False. Immigration and Customs Enforcement does >>>>>>>>>> give some immigrants phones. However, they can only access an app >>>>>>>>>> called SmartLink, which is used to monitor immigrants after they >>>>>>>>>> cross the border, according to the agency, the company that makes >>>>>>>>>> the phones and an immigration expert. The devices are not >>>>>>>>>> connected to a cellular network and cannot be used to browse the >>>>>>>>>> internet, make unauthorized phone calls, or access apps other
textSmartLink.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-immigrant-phone-internet-
remindersin g- 521577996794
Good trick.... AP apparently found someone who made that claim, >>>>>>>>> and made a big deal about it.
It wasn't part of the post you claimed to have been debunked, and >>>>>>>>> now you've said it was true.
What part of "free phones" did you not understand.
"ICE said the SmartLINK app sends push notifications and
tofor upcoming appointments; provides a database for participants
================You said that claims of giving phones to illegals had been debunked. >>>>> The claim was not about commercially available phones.The claim by conservaturds about "free phones" is fully functional >>>>>> commercially available phones - not the limited bricks that are given >>>>>> applicants that are legally in the immigration system.find food banks, clothing or other community services; and allows >>>>>>>>> users to upload and send documents to their case specialists." >>>>>>>>>Doesn't negate nor contradict the AP assessment.
Which not only doesn't "debunk" the claim that illegals got free >>>>>>> phones, it asserts that it's true. Do you have any more
"debunking."
If they had those phones, they were NOT "illegals" - they were in the >>>> System.
You see ALL immigrants as "illegal".
illegal immigrants do NOT get "money, free health care, free phones, >>>>>> free housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free tranny >>>>>> conversions and more." Some refugees, legal immigrants, legal asylum >>>>>> seekers do get SOME of those benefits under certain conditions - but >>>>>> none go to illegal immigrants.
So the "debunking" is just you repeating leftist talking points.
Welcome to Occupied America.
Leftist losers, unable to defend their agenda, will often resort to
making unsubstantiated nonsense claims about their opponents.
All undocumented immigrants are "criminals," Trump administration says
https://www.axios.com/2025/01/28/trump-immigrants-criminals-white-house- >> briefing
==============
All Undocumented Immigrants Are 'Criminals,' Says White House on ICE
Deportations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZp8jwENxss
Well maybe they should get documented.
point to yourself and say this is me
Skeeter OG wrote:
In article
<oVydnb5hPcLYCdX1nZ2dnZfqnPcAAAAA@giganews.com>,
pursent100@gmail.com says...
Baxter wrote:
% <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote inwell someone voted for it in fact a majority did ,
news:hgKdnW7fCpxDFtX1nZ2dnZfqnPUAAAAA@giganews.com:
Baxter wrote:
% <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote inthat's what was voted for did you vote
news:cf6dnR22U_6ZHtX1nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com:
Baxter wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>> news:05jg4k18d3nh7ssu9psud4k5t087oqmarp@4ax.com:illegal entry there are policies and processes ,
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 15:03:57 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>>> news:crrf4kljc700km8mef5neja8lbk2e99kil@4ax.com:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 02:32:43 -0000 (UTC), Baxterto
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>> news:v8le4kdj2mecbopt88edlueghbj2sktqu8@4ax.com:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 20:03:52 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>> in news:kv1e4k58j47f4o3q6gegnr97h1u1pb7kmb@4ax.com: >>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 15:15:20 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in news:gnuc4ktmeqtv27om90omnh955saohngivq@4ax.com: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 23:34:56 -0000 (UTC), Baxter >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote in news:jn3c4kdilra6semciddh3q7g7k7vaje14j@4ax.com: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 19:47:15 -0000 (UTC), Baxter >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:How
Curt <curtrr2@89701.net> wrote in
news:dcbg5h56kx.1749411259@xsjhi.pl:
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> posted some news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was okay for them to just ignore US law and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stroll on in?
about we give them the same due process that they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used
Losthat?do
Here's their rights: if they are illegal, out they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> go.
You can get a chance to try ignoring the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Constitution in
thanYou dickturd keep parroting the same old debunked >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propagandaAngeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> convince juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free >>>>>>>>> phones,
free housing, free education, free food, free >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clothing, free tranny conversions and more. Why don't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you try that in Mexico, see what happens and report >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> back?
Post the debunking.....
Let's start with one claim:
===========
CLAIM: The U.S. government gives immigrants who cross the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> countryâ??s border illegally smartphones with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unlimited texting and internet access.
APâ??S ASSESSMENT: False. Immigration and Customs >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Enforcement does give some immigrants phones. However, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they can only access an app called SmartLink, which is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used to monitor immigrants after they cross the border, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> according to the agency, the company that makes the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> phones and an immigration expert. The devices are not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> connected to a cellular network and cannot be used to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> browse the internet, make unauthorized phone calls, or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> access apps other
textSmartLink.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-immigrant-phone-inte >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rn et-
toin g- 521577996794
Good trick.... AP apparently found someone who made that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> claim, and made a big deal about it.
It wasn't part of the post you claimed to have been >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> debunked, and now you've said it was true.
What part of "free phones" did you not understand. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"ICE said the SmartLINK app sends push notifications and >>>>>>>>> reminders
for upcoming appointments; provides a database for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> participants
================You said that claims of giving phones to illegals had been >>>>>>>>>>>> debunked. The claim was not about commercially available >>>>>>>>>>>> phones.The claim by conservaturds about "free phones" is fully >>>>>>>>>>>>> functional commercially available phones - not the limited >>>>>>>>>>>>> bricks that are given applicants that are legally in the >>>>>>>>>>>>> immigration system.Which not only doesn't "debunk" the claim that illegals got >>>>>>>>>>>>>> free phones, it asserts that it's true. Do you have any >>>>>>>>>>>>>> more "debunking."find food banks, clothing or other community services; and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> allows users to upload and send documents to their case >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specialists."Doesn't negate nor contradict the AP assessment. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
If they had those phones, they were NOT "illegals" - they were >>>>>>>>>>> in the System.
You see ALL immigrants as "illegal".
illegal immigrants do NOT get "money, free health care, free >>>>>>>>>>>>> phones, free housing, free education, free food, free >>>>>>>>>>>>> clothing, free tranny conversions and more." Some refugees, >>>>>>>>>>>>> legal immigrants, legal asylum seekers do get SOME of those >>>>>>>>>>>>> benefits under certain conditions - but none go to illegal >>>>>>>>>>>>> immigrants.
So the "debunking" is just you repeating leftist talking >>>>>>>>>>>> points.
Welcome to Occupied America.
Leftist losers, unable to defend their agenda, will often resort >>>>>>>>>> to making unsubstantiated nonsense claims about their opponents. >>>>>>>>>>
All undocumented immigrants are "criminals," Trump administration >>>>>>>>> says
https://www.axios.com/2025/01/28/trump-immigrants-criminals-white- >>>>>>>>> ho use - briefing
Which is true, of course.
==============
All Undocumented Immigrants Are 'Criminals,' Says White House on >>>>>>>>> ICE Deportations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZp8jwENxss
Yes, they are, Dummy
What is their crime?
follow the procedures and you'll have no problem
Most of the migrants they are deporting entered legally and are
following all the rules about reporting/etc. They are deporting very >>>>> few actual criminals.
That's what conservaturds voted for - not me, I voted for sanity and Law. >>>
if you don't like the government in the country you live in , move
Baxter has nothing. He's is trying to be a troll ad
failing.
he can't be very good at it i didn't even notyice and i can spot a troll right off
Skeeter OG wrote:
In article
<WoCcnS5zPfH3N9X1nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
pursent100@gmail.com says...
Skeeter OG wrote:
In articlehe can't be very good at it i didn't even notyice and i can spot a troll >> right off
<oVydnb5hPcLYCdX1nZ2dnZfqnPcAAAAA@giganews.com>,
pursent100@gmail.com says...
Baxter wrote:
% <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote inwell someone voted for it in fact a majority did ,
news:hgKdnW7fCpxDFtX1nZ2dnZfqnPUAAAAA@giganews.com:
Baxter wrote:
% <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote inthat's what was voted for did you vote
news:cf6dnR22U_6ZHtX1nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com:
Baxter wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>>> news:05jg4k18d3nh7ssu9psud4k5t087oqmarp@4ax.com:illegal entry there are policies and processes ,
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 15:03:57 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>> news:crrf4kljc700km8mef5neja8lbk2e99kil@4ax.com:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 02:32:43 -0000 (UTC), Baxterto
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:v8le4kdj2mecbopt88edlueghbj2sktqu8@4ax.com:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 20:03:52 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in news:kv1e4k58j47f4o3q6gegnr97h1u1pb7kmb@4ax.com: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 15:15:20 -0000 (UTC), Baxter >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in news:gnuc4ktmeqtv27om90omnh955saohngivq@4ax.com: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 23:34:56 -0000 (UTC), Baxter >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote in news:jn3c4kdilra6semciddh3q7g7k7vaje14j@4ax.com: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 19:47:15 -0000 (UTC), Baxter >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>How
Curt <curtrr2@89701.net> wrote in
news:dcbg5h56kx.1749411259@xsjhi.pl: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> posted some news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was okay for them to just ignore US law and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stroll on in?
about we give them the same due process that they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used
Losthat?do
Here's their rights: if they are illegal, out they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> go.
You can get a chance to try ignoring the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Constitution in
thanYou dickturd keep parroting the same old debunked >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propagandaAngeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> convince juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free >>>>>>>>>>> phones,
free housing, free education, free food, free >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clothing, free tranny conversions and more. Why don't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you try that in Mexico, see what happens and report >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> back?
Post the debunking.....
Let's start with one claim:
===========
CLAIM: The U.S. government gives immigrants who cross the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> countryâ??s border illegally smartphones with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unlimited texting and internet access. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
APâ??S ASSESSMENT: False. Immigration and Customs >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Enforcement does give some immigrants phones. However, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they can only access an app called SmartLink, which is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used to monitor immigrants after they cross the border, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> according to the agency, the company that makes the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> phones and an immigration expert. The devices are not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> connected to a cellular network and cannot be used to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> browse the internet, make unauthorized phone calls, or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> access apps other
textSmartLink.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-immigrant-phone-inte
rn et-
toWhat part of "free phones" did you not understand. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>in g- 521577996794
Good trick.... AP apparently found someone who made that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> claim, and made a big deal about it.
It wasn't part of the post you claimed to have been >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> debunked, and now you've said it was true. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"ICE said the SmartLINK app sends push notifications and >>>>>>>>>>> reminders
for upcoming appointments; provides a database for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> participants
================You said that claims of giving phones to illegals had been >>>>>>>>>>>>>> debunked. The claim was not about commercially available >>>>>>>>>>>>>> phones.The claim by conservaturds about "free phones" is fully >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> functional commercially available phones - not the limited >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bricks that are given applicants that are legally in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> immigration system.Which not only doesn't "debunk" the claim that illegals got >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> free phones, it asserts that it's true. Do you have any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more "debunking."find food banks, clothing or other community services; and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> allows users to upload and send documents to their case >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specialists."Doesn't negate nor contradict the AP assessment. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
If they had those phones, they were NOT "illegals" - they were >>>>>>>>>>>>> in the System.
You see ALL immigrants as "illegal".
illegal immigrants do NOT get "money, free health care, free >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> phones, free housing, free education, free food, free >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clothing, free tranny conversions and more." Some refugees, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> legal immigrants, legal asylum seekers do get SOME of those >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> benefits under certain conditions - but none go to illegal >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> immigrants.
So the "debunking" is just you repeating leftist talking >>>>>>>>>>>>>> points.
Welcome to Occupied America.
Leftist losers, unable to defend their agenda, will often resort >>>>>>>>>>>> to making unsubstantiated nonsense claims about their opponents. >>>>>>>>>>>>
All undocumented immigrants are "criminals," Trump administration >>>>>>>>>>> says
https://www.axios.com/2025/01/28/trump-immigrants-criminals-white-
ho use - briefing
Which is true, of course.
==============
All Undocumented Immigrants Are 'Criminals,' Says White House on >>>>>>>>>>> ICE Deportations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZp8jwENxss
Yes, they are, Dummy
What is their crime?
follow the procedures and you'll have no problem
Most of the migrants they are deporting entered legally and are >>>>>>> following all the rules about reporting/etc. They are deporting very >>>>>>> few actual criminals.
That's what conservaturds voted for - not me, I voted for sanity and Law.
if you don't like the government in the country you live in , move
Baxter has nothing. He's is trying to be a troll ad
failing.
he sucks at it
he shouldn't try then ,
it's not something you get better at ,
you either got it or you don't
Skeeter OG wrote:
In article
<WoCcnS1zPfG_NNX1nZ2dnZfqn_UAAAAA@giganews.com>,
pursent100@gmail.com says...
Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <1029hgs$1ab8q$1@dont-email.me>, bax02point to yourself and say this is me
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:crrf4kljc700km8mef5neja8lbk2e99kil@4ax.com:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 02:32:43 -0000 (UTC), Baxterphones,
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:v8le4kdj2mecbopt88edlueghbj2sktqu8@4ax.com:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 20:03:52 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>> news:kv1e4k58j47f4o3q6gegnr97h1u1pb7kmb@4ax.com:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 15:15:20 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>>>> news:gnuc4ktmeqtv27om90omnh955saohngivq@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 23:34:56 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>> news:jn3c4kdilra6semciddh3q7g7k7vaje14j@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 19:47:15 -0000 (UTC), BaxterHow
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Curt <curtrr2@89701.net> wrote in
news:dcbg5h56kx.1749411259@xsjhi.pl:
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21:
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in?
that?about we give them the same due process that they used >>>> to
do
Here's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution in >>>> Los
Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he convince >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free
remindersPost the debunking.....free housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tranny conversions and more. Why don't you try that in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mexico, see what happens and report back?You dickturd keep parroting the same old debunked propaganda >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Let's start with one claim:
===========
CLAIM: The U.S. government gives immigrants who cross the >>>>>>>>>>>> country?s border illegally smartphones with unlimited texting and
internet access.
AP?S ASSESSMENT: False. Immigration and Customs Enforcement does >>>>>>>>>>>> give some immigrants phones. However, they can only access an app
called SmartLink, which is used to monitor immigrants after they >>>>>>>>>>>> cross the border, according to the agency, the company that makes
the phones and an immigration expert. The devices are not >>>>>>>>>>>> connected to a cellular network and cannot be used to browse the >>>>>>>>>>>> internet, make unauthorized phone calls, or access apps other >>>> than
SmartLink.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-immigrant-phone-internet- >>>> text
in g- 521577996794
Good trick.... AP apparently found someone who made that claim, >>>>>>>>>>> and made a big deal about it.
It wasn't part of the post you claimed to have been debunked, and >>>>>>>>>>> now you've said it was true.
What part of "free phones" did you not understand.
"ICE said the SmartLINK app sends push notifications and
================You said that claims of giving phones to illegals had been debunked. >>>>>>> The claim was not about commercially available phones.The claim by conservaturds about "free phones" is fully functional >>>>>>>> commercially available phones - not the limited bricks that are givenfor upcoming appointments; provides a database for participants >>>> toDoesn't negate nor contradict the AP assessment.
find food banks, clothing or other community services; and allows >>>>>>>>>>> users to upload and send documents to their case specialists." >>>>>>>>>>>
Which not only doesn't "debunk" the claim that illegals got free >>>>>>>>> phones, it asserts that it's true. Do you have any more
"debunking."
applicants that are legally in the immigration system.
If they had those phones, they were NOT "illegals" - they were in the >>>>>> System.
You see ALL immigrants as "illegal".
illegal immigrants do NOT get "money, free health care, free phones, >>>>>>>> free housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free tranny >>>>>>>> conversions and more." Some refugees, legal immigrants, legal asylum
seekers do get SOME of those benefits under certain conditions - but >>>>>>>> none go to illegal immigrants.
So the "debunking" is just you repeating leftist talking points. >>>>>>>
Welcome to Occupied America.
Leftist losers, unable to defend their agenda, will often resort to >>>>> making unsubstantiated nonsense claims about their opponents.
All undocumented immigrants are "criminals," Trump administration says >>>>
https://www.axios.com/2025/01/28/trump-immigrants-criminals-white-house- >>>> briefing
==============
All Undocumented Immigrants Are 'Criminals,' Says White House on ICE >>>> Deportations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZp8jwENxss
Well maybe they should get documented.
i did but i denied it
thern you can'ty live where you live you're not from there
Skeeter OG wrote:
In article
<WoCcnStzPfEMMNX1nZ2dnZfqn_UAAAAA@giganews.com>,
pursent100@gmail.com says...
Skeeter OG wrote:
In articlehe shouldn't try then ,
<WoCcnS5zPfH3N9X1nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
pursent100@gmail.com says...
Skeeter OG wrote:
In articlehe can't be very good at it i didn't even notyice and i can spot a troll >>>> right off
<oVydnb5hPcLYCdX1nZ2dnZfqnPcAAAAA@giganews.com>,
pursent100@gmail.com says...
Baxter has nothing. He's is trying to be a troll ad
Baxter wrote:
% <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote inwell someone voted for it in fact a majority did ,
news:hgKdnW7fCpxDFtX1nZ2dnZfqnPUAAAAA@giganews.com:
Baxter wrote:
% <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote inthat's what was voted for did you vote
news:cf6dnR22U_6ZHtX1nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com:
Baxter wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>> news:05jg4k18d3nh7ssu9psud4k5t087oqmarp@4ax.com:illegal entry there are policies and processes ,
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 15:03:57 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:crrf4kljc700km8mef5neja8lbk2e99kil@4ax.com:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 02:32:43 -0000 (UTC), Baxter >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:to
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:v8le4kdj2mecbopt88edlueghbj2sktqu8@4ax.com: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 20:03:52 -0000 (UTC), Baxter >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in news:kv1e4k58j47f4o3q6gegnr97h1u1pb7kmb@4ax.com: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 15:15:20 -0000 (UTC), Baxter >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote
in news:gnuc4ktmeqtv27om90omnh955saohngivq@4ax.com: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 23:34:56 -0000 (UTC), Baxter >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote in news:jn3c4kdilra6semciddh3q7g7k7vaje14j@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 19:47:15 -0000 (UTC), Baxter >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>How
Curt <curtrr2@89701.net> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:dcbg5h56kx.1749411259@xsjhi.pl: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> posted some news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21:
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was okay for them to just ignore US law and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stroll on in?
about we give them the same due process that they
used
Losthat?do
Here's their rights: if they are illegal, out they
go.
You can get a chance to try ignoring the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Constitution in
phones,Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> convince juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free
thanfree housing, free education, free food, free >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clothing, free tranny conversions and more. Why don'tYou dickturd keep parroting the same old debunked >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propaganda
you try that in Mexico, see what happens and report >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> back?
Post the debunking.....
Let's start with one claim:
===========
CLAIM: The U.S. government gives immigrants who cross the
countryâ??s border illegally smartphones with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unlimited texting and internet access. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
APâ??S ASSESSMENT: False. Immigration and Customs >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Enforcement does give some immigrants phones. However, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they can only access an app called SmartLink, which is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used to monitor immigrants after they cross the border, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> according to the agency, the company that makes the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> phones and an immigration expert. The devices are not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> connected to a cellular network and cannot be used to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> browse the internet, make unauthorized phone calls, or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> access apps other
textSmartLink.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-immigrant-phone-inte
rn et-
toWhat part of "free phones" did you not understand. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>in g- 521577996794
Good trick.... AP apparently found someone who made that
claim, and made a big deal about it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
It wasn't part of the post you claimed to have been >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> debunked, and now you've said it was true. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"ICE said the SmartLINK app sends push notifications and >>>>>>>>>>>>> reminders
for upcoming appointments; provides a database for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> participants
================You said that claims of giving phones to illegals had been >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> debunked. The claim was not about commercially available >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> phones.The claim by conservaturds about "free phones" is fully >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> functional commercially available phones - not the limited >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bricks that are given applicants that are legally in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> immigration system.Which not only doesn't "debunk" the claim that illegals gotfind food banks, clothing or other community services; andDoesn't negate nor contradict the AP assessment. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
allows users to upload and send documents to their case >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specialists."
free phones, it asserts that it's true. Do you have any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more "debunking."
If they had those phones, they were NOT "illegals" - they were
in the System.
You see ALL immigrants as "illegal".
illegal immigrants do NOT get "money, free health care, free
phones, free housing, free education, free food, free >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clothing, free tranny conversions and more." Some refugees,
legal immigrants, legal asylum seekers do get SOME of those >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> benefits under certain conditions - but none go to illegal >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> immigrants.
So the "debunking" is just you repeating leftist talking >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> points.
Welcome to Occupied America.
Leftist losers, unable to defend their agenda, will often resort
to making unsubstantiated nonsense claims about their opponents.
All undocumented immigrants are "criminals," Trump administration
says
https://www.axios.com/2025/01/28/trump-immigrants-criminals-white-
ho use - briefing
Which is true, of course.
==============
All Undocumented Immigrants Are 'Criminals,' Says White House on
ICE Deportations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZp8jwENxss
Yes, they are, Dummy
What is their crime?
follow the procedures and you'll have no problem
Most of the migrants they are deporting entered legally and are >>>>>>>>> following all the rules about reporting/etc. They are deporting very
few actual criminals.
That's what conservaturds voted for - not me, I voted for sanity and Law.
if you don't like the government in the country you live in , move >>>>>
failing.
he sucks at it
it's not something you get better at ,
you either got it or you don't
we desires to hang out with the big kids
if you can't take the things i say ,
well then a one and a two and a you know what to do
Skeeter OG wrote:
In article
<WoCcnShzPfGyMdX1nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
pursent100@gmail.com says...
Skeeter OG wrote:
In articlethern you can'ty live where you live you're not from there
<WoCcnS1zPfG_NNX1nZ2dnZfqn_UAAAAA@giganews.com>,
pursent100@gmail.com says...
Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <1029hgs$1ab8q$1@dont-email.me>, bax02point to yourself and say this is me
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:crrf4kljc700km8mef5neja8lbk2e99kil@4ax.com:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 02:32:43 -0000 (UTC), Baxtertext
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>> news:v8le4kdj2mecbopt88edlueghbj2sktqu8@4ax.com:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 20:03:52 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>>>> news:kv1e4k58j47f4o3q6gegnr97h1u1pb7kmb@4ax.com:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 15:15:20 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>> news:gnuc4ktmeqtv27om90omnh955saohngivq@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 23:34:56 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:jn3c4kdilra6semciddh3q7g7k7vaje14j@4ax.com: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 19:47:15 -0000 (UTC), Baxter >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:How
Curt <curtrr2@89701.net> wrote in
news:dcbg5h56kx.1749411259@xsjhi.pl:
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some
news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21:
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on
in?
that?about we give them the same due process that they used >>>>>> to
do
Post the debunking.....You dickturd keep parroting the same old debunked propaganda >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Here's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution in >>>>>> Los
Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he convince >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free >>>>>> phones,
free housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free
tranny conversions and more. Why don't you try that in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mexico, see what happens and report back?
Let's start with one claim:
===========
CLAIM: The U.S. government gives immigrants who cross the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> country?s border illegally smartphones with unlimited texting and
internet access.
AP?S ASSESSMENT: False. Immigration and Customs Enforcement does
give some immigrants phones. However, they can only access an app
called SmartLink, which is used to monitor immigrants after they
cross the border, according to the agency, the company that makes
the phones and an immigration expert. The devices are not >>>>>>>>>>>>>> connected to a cellular network and cannot be used to browse the
internet, make unauthorized phone calls, or access apps other >>>>>> than
SmartLink.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-immigrant-phone-internet-
remindersin g- 521577996794
Good trick.... AP apparently found someone who made that claim,
and made a big deal about it.
It wasn't part of the post you claimed to have been debunked, and
now you've said it was true.
What part of "free phones" did you not understand.
"ICE said the SmartLINK app sends push notifications and
================You said that claims of giving phones to illegals had been debunked.The claim by conservaturds about "free phones" is fully functional >>>>>>>>>> commercially available phones - not the limited bricks that are givenfor upcoming appointments; provides a database for participants >>>>>> toDoesn't negate nor contradict the AP assessment.
find food banks, clothing or other community services; and allows
users to upload and send documents to their case specialists." >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Which not only doesn't "debunk" the claim that illegals got free >>>>>>>>>>> phones, it asserts that it's true. Do you have any more >>>>>>>>>>> "debunking."
applicants that are legally in the immigration system.
The claim was not about commercially available phones.
If they had those phones, they were NOT "illegals" - they were in the
System.
You see ALL immigrants as "illegal".
illegal immigrants do NOT get "money, free health care, free phones,
free housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free tranny
conversions and more." Some refugees, legal immigrants, legal asylum
seekers do get SOME of those benefits under certain conditions - but
none go to illegal immigrants.
So the "debunking" is just you repeating leftist talking points. >>>>>>>>>
Welcome to Occupied America.
Leftist losers, unable to defend their agenda, will often resort to >>>>>>> making unsubstantiated nonsense claims about their opponents.
All undocumented immigrants are "criminals," Trump administration says >>>>>>
https://www.axios.com/2025/01/28/trump-immigrants-criminals-white-house-
briefing
==============
All Undocumented Immigrants Are 'Criminals,' Says White House on ICE >>>>>> Deportations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZp8jwENxss
Well maybe they should get documented.
i did but i denied it
i can'ty do much of anything at the moment
you could stand on your head
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 18:57:34 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:05jg4k18d3nh7ssu9psud4k5t087oqmarp@4ax.com:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 15:03:57 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:crrf4kljc700km8mef5neja8lbk2e99kil@4ax.com:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 02:32:43 -0000 (UTC), Baxterto
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:v8le4kdj2mecbopt88edlueghbj2sktqu8@4ax.com:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 20:03:52 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>> news:kv1e4k58j47f4o3q6gegnr97h1u1pb7kmb@4ax.com:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 15:15:20 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>>>> news:gnuc4ktmeqtv27om90omnh955saohngivq@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 23:34:56 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>> news:jn3c4kdilra6semciddh3q7g7k7vaje14j@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 19:47:15 -0000 (UTC), BaxterHow
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Curt <curtrr2@89701.net> wrote in
news:dcbg5h56kx.1749411259@xsjhi.pl:
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21:
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on in?
about we give them the same due process that they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used
Losthat?do
Here's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution in
phones,Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> convince juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless
they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free
thanPost the debunking.....free housing, free education, free food, free clothing, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> free tranny conversions and more. Why don't you try that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in Mexico, see what happens and report back?You dickturd keep parroting the same old debunked propaganda >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Let's start with one claim:
===========
CLAIM: The U.S. government gives immigrants who cross the >>>>>>>>>>>> countrys border illegally smartphones with unlimited texting >>>>>>>>>>>> and internet access.
APS ASSESSMENT: False. Immigration and Customs Enforcement >>>>>>>>>>>> does give some immigrants phones. However, they can only >>>>>>>>>>>> access an app called SmartLink, which is used to monitor >>>>>>>>>>>> immigrants after they cross the border, according to the >>>>>>>>>>>> agency, the company that makes the phones and an immigration >>>>>>>>>>>> expert. The devices are not connected to a cellular network >>>>>>>>>>>> and cannot be used to browse the internet, make unauthorized >>>>>>>>>>>> phone calls, or access apps other
remindersSmartLink.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-immigrant-phone-internet- >>>> text
in g- 521577996794
Good trick.... AP apparently found someone who made that >>>>>>>>>>> claim, and made a big deal about it.
It wasn't part of the post you claimed to have been debunked, >>>>>>>>>>> and now you've said it was true.
What part of "free phones" did you not understand.
"ICE said the SmartLINK app sends push notifications and
tofor upcoming appointments; provides a database for
participants
================You said that claims of giving phones to illegals had beenThe claim by conservaturds about "free phones" is fully functional >>>>>>>> commercially available phones - not the limited bricks that are >>>>>>>> given applicants that are legally in the immigration system.find food banks, clothing or other community services; and >>>>>>>>>>> allows users to upload and send documents to their caseDoesn't negate nor contradict the AP assessment.
specialists."
Which not only doesn't "debunk" the claim that illegals got free >>>>>>>>> phones, it asserts that it's true. Do you have any more
"debunking."
debunked. The claim was not about commercially available phones.
If they had those phones, they were NOT "illegals" - they were in
the System.
You see ALL immigrants as "illegal".
illegal immigrants do NOT get "money, free health care, free
phones, free housing, free education, free food, free clothing, >>>>>>>> free tranny conversions and more." Some refugees, legal
immigrants, legal asylum seekers do get SOME of those benefits >>>>>>>> under certain conditions - but none go to illegal immigrants.
So the "debunking" is just you repeating leftist talking points. >>>>>>>
Welcome to Occupied America.
Leftist losers, unable to defend their agenda, will often resort to
making unsubstantiated nonsense claims about their opponents.
All undocumented immigrants are "criminals," Trump administration says >>>>
https://www.axios.com/2025/01/28/trump-immigrants-criminals-white-house >>>> - briefing
Which is true, of course.
==============
All Undocumented Immigrants Are 'Criminals,' Says White House on ICE
Deportations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZp8jwENxss
Yes, they are, Dummy
What is their crime?
Being an illegal is their crime
Blowjob is too stupid to realize his tell. What a fucking idiot!
On 6/9/2025 7:42 PM, Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly obese convicted child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 09 Jun 2025, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> posted some
news:1026tq7$jqav$1@dont-email.me:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:gnuc4ktmeqtv27om90omnh955saohngivq@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 23:34:56 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:jn3c4kdilra6semciddh3q7g7k7vaje14j@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 19:47:15 -0000 (UTC), BaxterHow
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Curt <curtrr2@89701.net> wrote in
news:dcbg5h56kx.1749411259@xsjhi.pl:
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some
news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21:
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on >>>>>>>>>>>>> in?
that?about we give them the same due process that they used to >>>>>>>>>>>>> do
You dickturd keep parroting the same old debunked propagandaHere's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go.
You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution in Los >>>>>>>>>> Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he convince
juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless
they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free phones, >>>>>>>> free housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free
tranny conversions and more. Why don't you try that in Mexico, >>>>>>>> see what happens and report back?
Post the debunking.....
Let's start with one claim:
===========
CLAIM: The U.S. government gives immigrants who cross the
country’s border illegally smartphones with unlimited texting >>>>> and internet access.
AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. Immigration and Customs Enforcement does >>>>> give some immigrants phones. However, they can only access an app
called SmartLink, which is used to monitor immigrants after they
cross the border, according to the agency, the company that makes
the phones and an immigration expert. The devices are not
connected to a cellular network and cannot be used to browse the
internet, make unauthorized phone calls, or access apps other than
SmartLink.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-immigrant-phone-internet-text
ing - 521577996794
Good trick.... AP apparently found someone who made that claim,
and made a big deal about it.
It wasn't part of the post you claimed to have been debunked, and
now you've said it was true.
What part of "free phones" did you not understand.
Doesn't negate nor contradict the AP assessment.
"ICE said the SmartLINK app sends push notifications and reminders
for upcoming appointments; provides a database for participants to
find food banks, clothing or other community services; and allows
users to upload and send documents to their case specialists."
And the biggest thing you turdbrains keep deliberately missing is
that yes, some of this stuff is provided LEGAL immigrants, but NOT
TO ILLEGAL immigrants.
As some are starting to point out, conservaturds are claiming ALL
immigrants are "illegal".
==========
Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more
A felon in the White House is making crime legal
Meanwhile, he's creating fake crimes to punish the law abiding.
David R. Lurie
Jun 9
Lurie is a well documented nut and
You're a well-documented lying shitbag, Blowjob, you lying shitbag.
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 18:57:34 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:in
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>news:05jg4k18d3nh7ssu9psud4k5t087oqmarp@4ax.com:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 15:03:57 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>news:crrf4kljc700km8mef5neja8lbk2e99kil@4ax.com:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 02:32:43 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>news:v8le4kdj2mecbopt88edlueghbj2sktqu8@4ax.com:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 20:03:52 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>>news:kv1e4k58j47f4o3q6gegnr97h1u1pb7kmb@4ax.com:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 15:15:20 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>news:gnuc4ktmeqtv27om90omnh955saohngivq@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 23:34:56 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote
strollnews:jn3c4kdilra6semciddh3q7g7k7vaje14j@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 19:47:15 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Curt <curtrr2@89701.net> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>news:dcbg5h56kx.1749411259@xsjhi.pl:
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21:
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and
go.toHowon in?
about we give them the same due process that they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >used
that?do
Here's their rights: if they are illegal, out they
in
You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution
propagandaLos
You dickturd keep parroting the same old debunkedAngeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> convince juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless
they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free >>>>phones,
free housing, free education, free food, free clothing, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> free tranny conversions and more. Why don't you try that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in Mexico, see what happens and report back?
internet-than
Post the debunking.....
Let's start with one claim:
===========
CLAIM: The U.S. government gives immigrants who cross the >>>>>>>>>>>>countrys border illegally smartphones with unlimited texting >>>>>>>>>>>>and internet access.
APS ASSESSMENT: False. Immigration and Customs Enforcement >>>>>>>>>>>>does give some immigrants phones. However, they can only >>>>>>>>>>>>access an app called SmartLink, which is used to monitor >>>>>>>>>>>>immigrants after they cross the border, according to the >>>>>>>>>>>>agency, the company that makes the phones and an immigration >>>>>>>>>>>>expert. The devices are not connected to a cellular network >>>>>>>>>>>>and cannot be used to browse the internet, make unauthorized >>>>>>>>>>>>phone calls, or access apps other
SmartLink.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-immigrant-phone-
freetext
toin g- 521577996794
Good trick.... AP apparently found someone who made that >>>>>>>>>>> claim, and made a big deal about it.
It wasn't part of the post you claimed to have been debunked, >>>>>>>>>>> and now you've said it was true.
What part of "free phones" did you not understand.
"ICE said the SmartLINK app sends push notifications and >>>>reminders
for upcoming appointments; provides a database for
participants
find food banks, clothing or other community services; and >>>>>>>>>>> allows users to upload and send documents to their caseDoesn't negate nor contradict the AP assessment.
specialists."
Which not only doesn't "debunk" the claim that illegals got
functionalphones, it asserts that it's true. Do you have any moreThe claim by conservaturds about "free phones" is fully
"debunking."
says================commercially available phones - not the limited bricks that are >>>>>>>>given applicants that are legally in the immigration system.You said that claims of giving phones to illegals had been
debunked. The claim was not about commercially available phones.
If they had those phones, they were NOT "illegals" - they were in >>>>>>the System.
You see ALL immigrants as "illegal".
illegal immigrants do NOT get "money, free health care, free >>>>>>>>phones, free housing, free education, free food, free clothing, >>>>>>>>free tranny conversions and more." Some refugees, legal >>>>>>>>immigrants, legal asylum seekers do get SOME of those benefits >>>>>>>>under certain conditions - but none go to illegal immigrants.
So the "debunking" is just you repeating leftist talking points. >>>>>>>
Welcome to Occupied America.
Leftist losers, unable to defend their agenda, will often resort to
making unsubstantiated nonsense claims about their opponents.
All undocumented immigrants are "criminals," Trump administration
house
https://www.axios.com/2025/01/28/trump-immigrants-criminals-white-
- briefing
Which is true, of course.
==============
All Undocumented Immigrants Are 'Criminals,' Says White House on ICE >>>>Deportations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZp8jwENxss
Yes, they are, Dummy
What is their crime?
Being an illegal is their crime
On 6/10/2025 4:01 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 11:29:39 -0700, c186282 <c186282@naoda.net> wrote:
On 6/9/2025 4:11 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 09:49:28 -0700, c186282 <c186282@nada.net> wrote:
On 6/8/2025 6:13 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 14:17:31 -0700, c186282 <c186282@nada.net> wrote: >>>>>>Follow your own advice first and be an example to her.
On 6/7/2025 6:05 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jun 2025 13:36:38 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> >>>>>>>> wrote:
On 6/6/25 10:27, Scout wrote:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:101v8b7$2ct8n$5@dont-email.me...
On 6/6/25 4:07, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:25:31 -0700, Siri Cruz
<chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you >>>>>>>>>>>>>> overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here. >>>>>>>>>>>>>How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be >>>>>>>>>>>>> deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others >>>>>>>>>>>>> who
cannot be deported?
Just explain how privacy is a factor.
'without encroaching on rights of citizens'.
So there is no factor.
You have already demanded citizens have no rights.
Huh?
Put the bottle down.
I tell Siri this daily but he refuses.
I never drink.
Then it's either drugs or severe mental illness. Either way, you need some help.
Laughter.
You have delusions that you posted something
No delusions. I have posted it several times.
but it's myself that needs the help?
Yes. You're exhibiting some severe cognitive debility. You say you don't drink >or do drugs, so it has to be mental illness.
We seem to be spending a lot of time with you claiming you posted
something
I did, several times.
yet you refuse to either link to that message
Usenet posts don't have "links", dummy.
nor repost the content.
I have, several times.
On 6/10/2025 4:03 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 11:28:23 -0700, c186282 <c186282@naoda.net> wrote:
On 6/9/2025 4:14 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 09:57:45 -0700, c186282 <c186282@nada.net> wrote:
On 6/8/2025 6:17 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 07 Jun 2025 09:01:41 -0400, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>>>>>
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 08:53:25 -0700, c186282 <c186282@nada.net> wrote: >>>>>>>
On 6/6/2025 4:07 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:25:31 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to >>>>>>>>>>> deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you >>>>>>>>>>> overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here. >>>>>>>>>>How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be
deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others who >>>>>>>>>> cannot be deported?
Just explain how privacy is a factor.
I already did.
Link to the message please because no you did not.
<crickets.wav>
This is a really childish and stupid practice of yours to reply to your own post
to bitch and moan about someone not replying to you, ESPECIALLY because I DID
reply to your petulant bitchy demand.
Looks like you're starting to slip out there Rudely.
Evasion noted.
Tacit admission noted.
Wrong.
It really is childish and stupid of you constantly to reply to your own posts, >bitching and moaning about your opponent ignoring you. All your opponents >eventually ignore your trolling.
Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <VN-
dnXxLprR7WdX1nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com>, pursent100
@gmail.com says...
Skeeter OG wrote:
In articleif you can't take the things i say ,
<WoCcnStzPfEMMNX1nZ2dnZfqn_UAAAAA@giganews.com>,
pursent100@gmail.com says...
Skeeter OG wrote:
In articlehe shouldn't try then ,
<WoCcnS5zPfH3N9X1nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
pursent100@gmail.com says...
Skeeter OG wrote:
In articlehe can't be very good at it i didn't even notyice and i can spot a troll
<oVydnb5hPcLYCdX1nZ2dnZfqnPcAAAAA@giganews.com>,
pursent100@gmail.com says...
Baxter has nothing. He's is trying to be a troll ad
Baxter wrote:
% <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote inwell someone voted for it in fact a majority did ,
news:hgKdnW7fCpxDFtX1nZ2dnZfqnPUAAAAA@giganews.com:
Baxter wrote:
% <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote inthat's what was voted for did you vote
news:cf6dnR22U_6ZHtX1nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com:
Baxter wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:05jg4k18d3nh7ssu9psud4k5t087oqmarp@4ax.com:illegal entry there are policies and processes ,
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 15:03:57 -0000 (UTC), Baxter >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:crrf4kljc700km8mef5neja8lbk2e99kil@4ax.com: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 02:32:43 -0000 (UTC), Baxter >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:to
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:v8le4kdj2mecbopt88edlueghbj2sktqu8@4ax.com: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 20:03:52 -0000 (UTC), Baxter >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote
in news:kv1e4k58j47f4o3q6gegnr97h1u1pb7kmb@4ax.com: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 15:15:20 -0000 (UTC), Baxter >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote
in news:gnuc4ktmeqtv27om90omnh955saohngivq@4ax.com: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 23:34:56 -0000 (UTC), Baxter >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote in news:jn3c4kdilra6semciddh3q7g7k7vaje14j@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 19:47:15 -0000 (UTC), Baxter >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>How
Curt <curtrr2@89701.net> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:dcbg5h56kx.1749411259@xsjhi.pl: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> posted some news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21:
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was okay for them to just ignore US law and
stroll on in?
about we give them the same due process that they
used
Losthat?do
Here's their rights: if they are illegal, out they
go.
You can get a chance to try ignoring the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Constitution in
phones,Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> convince juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free
thanfree housing, free education, free food, free >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clothing, free tranny conversions and more. Why don'tYou dickturd keep parroting the same old debunked >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propaganda
you try that in Mexico, see what happens and report
back?
Post the debunking.....
Let's start with one claim:
===========
CLAIM: The U.S. government gives immigrants who cross the
countryâ??s border illegally smartphones with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unlimited texting and internet access. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
APâ??S ASSESSMENT: False. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement does give some immigrants phones. However,
they can only access an app called SmartLink, which is
used to monitor immigrants after they cross the border,
according to the agency, the company that makes the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> phones and an immigration expert. The devices are not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> connected to a cellular network and cannot be used to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> browse the internet, make unauthorized phone calls, or
access apps other
textSmartLink.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-immigrant-phone-inte
rn et-
remindersWhat part of "free phones" did you not understand. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>in g- 521577996794
Good trick.... AP apparently found someone who made that
claim, and made a big deal about it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
It wasn't part of the post you claimed to have been >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> debunked, and now you've said it was true. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"ICE said the SmartLINK app sends push notifications and
tofor upcoming appointments; provides a database for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> participants
================You said that claims of giving phones to illegals had been >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> debunked. The claim was not about commercially available >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> phones.The claim by conservaturds about "free phones" is fully >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> functional commercially available phones - not the limitedWhich not only doesn't "debunk" the claim that illegals gotfind food banks, clothing or other community services; andDoesn't negate nor contradict the AP assessment. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
allows users to upload and send documents to their case
specialists."
free phones, it asserts that it's true. Do you have any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more "debunking."
bricks that are given applicants that are legally in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> immigration system.
If they had those phones, they were NOT "illegals" - they were
in the System.
You see ALL immigrants as "illegal".
illegal immigrants do NOT get "money, free health care, free
phones, free housing, free education, free food, free >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clothing, free tranny conversions and more." Some refugees,
legal immigrants, legal asylum seekers do get SOME of those
benefits under certain conditions - but none go to illegal
immigrants.
So the "debunking" is just you repeating leftist talking >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> points.
Welcome to Occupied America.
Leftist losers, unable to defend their agenda, will often resort
to making unsubstantiated nonsense claims about their opponents.
All undocumented immigrants are "criminals," Trump administration
says
https://www.axios.com/2025/01/28/trump-immigrants-criminals-white-
ho use - briefing
Which is true, of course.
==============
All Undocumented Immigrants Are 'Criminals,' Says White House on
ICE Deportations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZp8jwENxss
Yes, they are, Dummy
What is their crime?
follow the procedures and you'll have no problem
Most of the migrants they are deporting entered legally and are >>>>>>>>>>> following all the rules about reporting/etc. They are deporting very
few actual criminals.
That's what conservaturds voted for - not me, I voted for sanity and Law.
if you don't like the government in the country you live in , move >>>>>>>
failing.
right off
he sucks at it
it's not something you get better at ,
you either got it or you don't
we desires to hang out with the big kids
well then a one and a two and a you know what to do
i said we when i meant he
i said him when i meant tim
Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <VN-
dnX9LprSIWNX1nZ2dnZfqn_cAAAAA@giganews.com>, pursent100
@gmail.com says...
Skeeter OG wrote:
In articleyou could stand on your head
<WoCcnShzPfGyMdX1nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
pursent100@gmail.com says...
Skeeter OG wrote:
In articlethern you can'ty live where you live you're not from there
<WoCcnS1zPfG_NNX1nZ2dnZfqn_UAAAAA@giganews.com>,
pursent100@gmail.com says...
Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <1029hgs$1ab8q$1@dont-email.me>, bax02point to yourself and say this is me
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>> news:crrf4kljc700km8mef5neja8lbk2e99kil@4ax.com:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 02:32:43 -0000 (UTC), Baxterto
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>>>> news:v8le4kdj2mecbopt88edlueghbj2sktqu8@4ax.com:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 20:03:52 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>> news:kv1e4k58j47f4o3q6gegnr97h1u1pb7kmb@4ax.com:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 15:15:20 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:gnuc4ktmeqtv27om90omnh955saohngivq@4ax.com: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 23:34:56 -0000 (UTC), Baxter >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:jn3c4kdilra6semciddh3q7g7k7vaje14j@4ax.com: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 19:47:15 -0000 (UTC), Baxter >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:How
Curt <curtrr2@89701.net> wrote in
news:dcbg5h56kx.1749411259@xsjhi.pl:
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some
news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on
in?
about we give them the same due process that they used
Losthat?do
Here's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go.
You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution in
thanYou dickturd keep parroting the same old debunked propagandaAngeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he convince
juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free >>>>>>>> phones,
free housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free
tranny conversions and more. Why don't you try that in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mexico, see what happens and report back? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Post the debunking.....
Let's start with one claim:
===========
CLAIM: The U.S. government gives immigrants who cross the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> country?s border illegally smartphones with unlimited texting and
internet access.
AP?S ASSESSMENT: False. Immigration and Customs Enforcement does
give some immigrants phones. However, they can only access an app
called SmartLink, which is used to monitor immigrants after they
cross the border, according to the agency, the company that makes
the phones and an immigration expert. The devices are not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> connected to a cellular network and cannot be used to browse the
internet, make unauthorized phone calls, or access apps other
textSmartLink.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-immigrant-phone-internet-
toin g- 521577996794
Good trick.... AP apparently found someone who made that claim,
and made a big deal about it.
It wasn't part of the post you claimed to have been debunked, and
now you've said it was true.
What part of "free phones" did you not understand. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"ICE said the SmartLINK app sends push notifications and >>>>>>>> reminders
for upcoming appointments; provides a database for participants
================You said that claims of giving phones to illegals had been debunked.The claim by conservaturds about "free phones" is fully functionalfind food banks, clothing or other community services; and allowsDoesn't negate nor contradict the AP assessment.
users to upload and send documents to their case specialists."
Which not only doesn't "debunk" the claim that illegals got free
phones, it asserts that it's true. Do you have any more >>>>>>>>>>>>> "debunking."
commercially available phones - not the limited bricks that are given
applicants that are legally in the immigration system. >>>>>>>>>>>>
The claim was not about commercially available phones.
If they had those phones, they were NOT "illegals" - they were in the
System.
You see ALL immigrants as "illegal".
illegal immigrants do NOT get "money, free health care, free phones,
free housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free tranny
conversions and more." Some refugees, legal immigrants, legal asylum
seekers do get SOME of those benefits under certain conditions - but
none go to illegal immigrants.
So the "debunking" is just you repeating leftist talking points. >>>>>>>>>>>
Welcome to Occupied America.
Leftist losers, unable to defend their agenda, will often resort to >>>>>>>>> making unsubstantiated nonsense claims about their opponents. >>>>>>>>>
All undocumented immigrants are "criminals," Trump administration says
https://www.axios.com/2025/01/28/trump-immigrants-criminals-white-house-
briefing
==============
All Undocumented Immigrants Are 'Criminals,' Says White House on ICE >>>>>>>> Deportations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZp8jwENxss
Well maybe they should get documented.
i did but i denied it
i can'ty do much of anything at the moment
i tried buy it smothered my toot toot
be careful with that stuff ,
you don't wanna spill any toot toot
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 11:33:02 -0700, c186282 <c186282@naoda.net> wrote:
On 6/10/2025 4:01 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 11:29:39 -0700, c186282 <c186282@naoda.net> wrote:
On 6/9/2025 4:11 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 09:49:28 -0700, c186282 <c186282@nada.net> wrote: >>>>>
On 6/8/2025 6:13 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 14:17:31 -0700, c186282 <c186282@nada.net> wrote: >>>>>>>Follow your own advice first and be an example to her.
On 6/7/2025 6:05 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jun 2025 13:36:38 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
On 6/6/25 10:27, Scout wrote:
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:101v8b7$2ct8n$5@dont-email.me...
On 6/6/25 4:07, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:25:31 -0700, Siri Cruz
<chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be >>>>>>>>>>>>>> deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others >>>>>>>>>>>>>> who
cannot be deported?
Just explain how privacy is a factor.
'without encroaching on rights of citizens'.
So there is no factor.
You have already demanded citizens have no rights.
Huh?
Put the bottle down.
I tell Siri this daily but he refuses.
I never drink.
Then it's either drugs or severe mental illness. Either way, you need some >>>> help.
Laughter.
You have delusions that you posted something
No delusions. I have posted it several times.
Where and when?
Cite a message ID or repost from any of them.
but it's myself that needs the help?
Yes. You're exhibiting some severe cognitive debility. You say you don't drink
or do drugs, so it has to be mental illness.
Laughter.
We seem to be spending a lot of time with you claiming you posted
something
I did, several times.
See above.
yet you refuse to either link to that message
Usenet posts don't have "links", dummy.
nor repost the content.
I have, several times.
Last time Rudely and I have been very patient with you.
Either post the message ID's or quote from it below:
On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 08:30:33 -0700, c186282 <c186282@naoda.net> wrote:
On 6/11/2025 4:03 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 11:35:18 -0700, c186282 <c186282@naoda.net> wrote:
On 6/10/2025 4:06 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 11:27:01 -0700, c186282 <c186282@naoda.net> wrote: >>>>>
On 6/9/2025 4:15 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 09:57:45 -0700, c186282 <c186282@nada.net> wrote: >>>>>>>
On 6/8/2025 6:17 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 07 Jun 2025 09:01:41 -0400, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 08:53:25 -0700, c186282 <c186282@nada.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>
On 6/6/2025 4:07 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:25:31 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. If you >>>>>>>>>>>>>> overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a factor here. >>>>>>>>>>>>>How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be >>>>>>>>>>>>> deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and others who >>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot be deported?
Just explain how privacy is a factor.
I already did.
Link to the message please because no you did not.
<crickets.wav>
This is a really childish and stupid practice of yours to reply to your
own post
to bitch and moan about someone not replying to you, ESPECIALLY because I DID
reply to your petulant bitchy demand.
Post the link please.
Usenet posts don't have "links".
Actually they do if you're using a proper newsreader.
No, they don't. There's a message ID, but that doesn't do any good.
Actually it does. A properly formatted message ID link will load the
message in your newsreader.
No, it won't.
Laughter.
Your lack of technological awareness is showing.
You didn't lie about having posted it did you?
No. It was on 06/07 at 17.17h EDT
If you are unable to post the link to the message, then post the
content in its entirety below.
I've given you all you need and all you're going to get. Find my post with that
timestamp and read it.
I have reviewed the thread during that time and there is no message
with that time stamp.
There is. Stop lying. I just looked at it again. 06/07 at 17.17h EDT. It's right
there.
If you did, you could have quoted it but you can't.
You are simply lying.
This is not an unreasonable request.
It is entirely unreasonable, because it is nothing more than you trying to waste
my time.
How much time would it take for you to quote it vs all the time you've
spent claiming you already posted it?
How much time would it take for you to find it and read it with the accurate >> timestamp I've provided you?
If it doesn't exist (which it doesn't)
Laughter.
<yawn>
Go find the post and read it. You've spent more time bitching about
"links" than it would have taken you to go find the post on your own. Your time
must have very little value.
Troll on!
Trolling is your game. Trolling, and name-calling, and ad hominem, and bitching
and moaning about being ignored.
Bye troll. I've given more than enough opportunity.
<plonk>
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in news:kv1e4k58j47f4o3q6gegnr97h1u1pb7kmb@4ax.com:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 15:15:20 -0000 (UTC), BaxterThe claim by conservaturds about "free phones" is fully functional commercially available phones - not the limited bricks that are given applicants that are legally in the immigration system.
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>news:gnuc4ktmeqtv27om90omnh955saohngivq@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 23:34:56 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>news:jn3c4kdilra6semciddh3q7g7k7vaje14j@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 19:47:15 -0000 (UTC), BaxterHow
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Curt <curtrr2@89701.net> wrote in >>>>>>>news:dcbg5h56kx.1749411259@xsjhi.pl:
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some
news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21:
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on >>>>>>>>>>>> >in?
that?about we give them the same due process that they used to >>>>>>>>>>>> >do
You dickturd keep parroting the same old debunked propagandaHere's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go.
You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution in Los >>>>>>>>>> Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he convince
juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless
they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free phones, >>>>>>>> free housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free
tranny conversions and more. Why don't you try that in Mexico, >>>>>>>> see what happens and report back?
Post the debunking.....
Let's start with one claim:
===========
CLAIM: The U.S. government gives immigrants who cross the country's >>>>>border illegally smartphones with unlimited texting and internet >>>>>access.
AP'S ASSESSMENT: False. Immigration and Customs Enforcement does
give some immigrants phones. However, they can only access an app >>>>>called SmartLink, which is used to monitor immigrants after they >>>>>cross the border, according to the agency, the company that makes
the phones and an immigration expert. The devices are not connected >>>>>to a cellular network and cannot be used to browse the internet,
make unauthorized phone calls, or access apps other than SmartLink.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-immigrant-phone-internet-texti >>>>>n g- 521577996794
Good trick.... AP apparently found someone who made that claim,
and made a big deal about it.
It wasn't part of the post you claimed to have been debunked, and
now you've said it was true.
What part of "free phones" did you not understand.
Doesn't negate nor contradict the AP assessment.
"ICE said the SmartLINK app sends push notifications and reminders
for upcoming appointments; provides a database for participants to
find food banks, clothing or other community services; and allows
users to upload and send documents to their case specialists."
Which not only doesn't "debunk" the claim that illegals got free
phones, it asserts that it's true. Do you have any more "debunking."
illegal immigrants do NOT get "money, free health care, free phones,
free housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free tranny conversions and more." Some refugees, legal immigrants, legal asylum
seekers do get SOME of those benefits under certain conditions - but
none go to illegal immigrants.
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 11:34:32 -0700, c186282 <c186282@naoda.net> wrote:
On 6/9/2025 4:07 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 09:44:56 -0700, c186282 <c186282@naoda.net>
wrote:
On 6/8/2025 6:11 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 07 Jun 2025 22:38:03 +0000, AlleyCant <al@aohello.con>The Trump regime's immigration Gestapo must follow the Constitution
wrote:
On 07 Jun 2025, c186282 <c186282@naoda.net> posted some
news:G_11Q.746776$%pKb.677737@fx14.iad:
On 6/7/2025 6:02 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jun 2025 10:25:59 -0700, Siri Cruz
<chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
On 6/6/25 4:07, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:25:31 -0700, Siri Cruz
<chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
On 5/6/25 3:51, NoBody wrote:
You have yet to explain how "privacy concerns" is an issue >>>>>>>>>>>> to deporting illegals but rest your entire opinion on it. >>>>>>>>>>>> If you overstay your visa you're out. Privacy is not a >>>>>>>>>>>> factor here.
How do you quickly and cheaply identify people who can be >>>>>>>>>>> deported without encroaching on rights of citizens and
others who cannot be deported?
Just explain how privacy is a factor.
'without encroaching on rights of citizens'.
That does not answer the question.
It does. The methods you want Trump's immigration Gestapo to use >>>>>>> in apprehending unlawfully present aliens violate the fourth
amendment, which is a privacy protection. The first through
fifth amendments all are in part privacy protections, but
especially the fourth.
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on in? How
about we give them the same due process that they used to do
that?
Here's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go.
and the law in deporting them. You want them not to have to do
that. You will lose.
What privacy rights are being violated.
Asked and answered.
So you claim yet you can't point to where you answered it.
Why not?
Blowjob is too stupid to realize his tell. What a fucking idiot!
On 6/9/2025 7:42 PM, Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly obese convicted child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 09 Jun 2025, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> posted some
news:1026tq7$jqav$1@dont-email.me:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:gnuc4ktmeqtv27om90omnh955saohngivq@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 23:34:56 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:jn3c4kdilra6semciddh3q7g7k7vaje14j@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 19:47:15 -0000 (UTC), BaxterHow
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Curt <curtrr2@89701.net> wrote in
news:dcbg5h56kx.1749411259@xsjhi.pl:
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some
news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21:
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on >>>>>>>>>>>>> in?
that?about we give them the same due process that they used to >>>>>>>>>>>>> do
You dickturd keep parroting the same old debunked propagandaHere's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go.
You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution in Los >>>>>>>>>> Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he convince
juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless
they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free phones, >>>>>>>> free housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free
tranny conversions and more. Why don't you try that in Mexico, >>>>>>>> see what happens and report back?
Post the debunking.....
Let's start with one claim:
===========
CLAIM: The U.S. government gives immigrants who cross the
country’s border illegally smartphones with unlimited texting >>>>> and internet access.
AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. Immigration and Customs Enforcement does >>>>> give some immigrants phones. However, they can only access an app
called SmartLink, which is used to monitor immigrants after they
cross the border, according to the agency, the company that makes
the phones and an immigration expert. The devices are not
connected to a cellular network and cannot be used to browse the
internet, make unauthorized phone calls, or access apps other than
SmartLink.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-immigrant-phone-internet-text
ing - 521577996794
Good trick.... AP apparently found someone who made that claim,
and made a big deal about it.
It wasn't part of the post you claimed to have been debunked, and
now you've said it was true.
What part of "free phones" did you not understand.
Doesn't negate nor contradict the AP assessment.
"ICE said the SmartLINK app sends push notifications and reminders
for upcoming appointments; provides a database for participants to
find food banks, clothing or other community services; and allows
users to upload and send documents to their case specialists."
And the biggest thing you turdbrains keep deliberately missing is
that yes, some of this stuff is provided LEGAL immigrants, but NOT
TO ILLEGAL immigrants.
As some are starting to point out, conservaturds are claiming ALL
immigrants are "illegal".
==========
Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more
A felon in the White House is making crime legal
Meanwhile, he's creating fake crimes to punish the law abiding.
David R. Lurie
Jun 9
Lurie is a well documented nut and
I'm a well-documented lying shitbag
% <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote in news:cf6dnR22U_6ZHtX1nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com:
Baxter wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote inillegal entry there are policies and processes ,
news:05jg4k18d3nh7ssu9psud4k5t087oqmarp@4ax.com:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 15:03:57 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:crrf4kljc700km8mef5neja8lbk2e99kil@4ax.com:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 02:32:43 -0000 (UTC), Baxterreminders
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>
What part of "free phones" did you not understand.
"ICE said the SmartLINK app sends push notifications and
tofor upcoming appointments; provides a database for
participants
================You said that claims of giving phones to illegals had beenThe claim by conservaturds about "free phones" is fullyfind food banks, clothing or other community services; and >>>>>>>>>>>> allows users to upload and send documents to their case >>>>>>>>>>>> specialists."Doesn't negate nor contradict the AP assessment.
Which not only doesn't "debunk" the claim that illegals got >>>>>>>>>> free phones, it asserts that it's true. Do you have any more >>>>>>>>>> "debunking."
functional commercially available phones - not the limited
bricks that are given applicants that are legally in the
immigration system.
debunked. The claim was not about commercially available
phones.
If they had those phones, they were NOT "illegals" - they were
in the System.
You see ALL immigrants as "illegal".
illegal immigrants do NOT get "money, free health care, free >>>>>>>>> phones, free housing, free education, free food, free
clothing, free tranny conversions and more." Some refugees, >>>>>>>>> legal immigrants, legal asylum seekers do get SOME of those
benefits under certain conditions - but none go to illegal
immigrants.
So the "debunking" is just you repeating leftist talking
points.
Welcome to Occupied America.
Leftist losers, unable to defend their agenda, will often resort
to making unsubstantiated nonsense claims about their opponents.
All undocumented immigrants are "criminals," Trump administration
says
https://www.axios.com/2025/01/28/trump-immigrants-criminals-white-h
o use - briefing
Which is true, of course.
==============
All Undocumented Immigrants Are 'Criminals,' Says White House on
ICE Deportations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZp8jwENxss
Yes, they are, Dummy
What is their crime?
follow the procedures and you'll have no problem
Most of the migrants they are deporting entered legally and are
following all the rules about reporting/etc. They are deporting very
few actual criminals.
On 09 Jun 2025, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> posted some news:1027en7$nrr8$3@dont-email.me:texti
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:kv1e4k58j47f4o3q6gegnr97h1u1pb7kmb@4ax.com:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 15:15:20 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>news:gnuc4ktmeqtv27om90omnh955saohngivq@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 23:34:56 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>news:jn3c4kdilra6semciddh3q7g7k7vaje14j@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 19:47:15 -0000 (UTC), BaxterHow
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Curt <curtrr2@89701.net> wrote in >>>>>>>>news:dcbg5h56kx.1749411259@xsjhi.pl:
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some >>>>>>>>> news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21:
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on >>>>>>>>>>>>> >in?
that?about we give them the same due process that they used to >>>>>>>>>>>>> >do
You dickturd keep parroting the same old debunked propagandaHere's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go. >>>>>>>>>>>You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution in Los >>>>>>>>>>> Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he convince >>>>>>>>>>> juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless
they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free phones, >>>>>>>>> free housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free >>>>>>>>> tranny conversions and more. Why don't you try that in Mexico, >>>>>>>>> see what happens and report back?
Post the debunking.....
Let's start with one claim:
===========
CLAIM: The U.S. government gives immigrants who cross the country's >>>>>>border illegally smartphones with unlimited texting and internet >>>>>>access.
AP'S ASSESSMENT: False. Immigration and Customs Enforcement does >>>>>>give some immigrants phones. However, they can only access an app >>>>>>called SmartLink, which is used to monitor immigrants after they >>>>>>cross the border, according to the agency, the company that makes >>>>>>the phones and an immigration expert. The devices are not connected >>>>>>to a cellular network and cannot be used to browse the internet, >>>>>>make unauthorized phone calls, or access apps other than SmartLink. >>>>>>
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-immigrant-phone-internet-
The claim by conservaturds about "free phones" is fully functionaln g- 521577996794
Good trick.... AP apparently found someone who made that claim,
and made a big deal about it.
It wasn't part of the post you claimed to have been debunked, and
now you've said it was true.
What part of "free phones" did you not understand.
Doesn't negate nor contradict the AP assessment.
"ICE said the SmartLINK app sends push notifications and reminders
for upcoming appointments; provides a database for participants to
find food banks, clothing or other community services; and allows
users to upload and send documents to their case specialists."
Which not only doesn't "debunk" the claim that illegals got free
phones, it asserts that it's true. Do you have any more "debunking."
commercially available phones - not the limited bricks that are given
applicants that are legally in the immigration system.
illegal immigrants do NOT get "money, free health care, free phones,
free housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free tranny
conversions and more." Some refugees, legal immigrants, legal asylum
seekers do get SOME of those benefits under certain conditions - but
none go to illegal immigrants.
They do in California, Illinois and New York.
George Pimpton <jorge@si.not> wrote in news:cf896f763a.1749882787
@tmxho.ke:
On 09 Jun 2025, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> posted some news:1027en7$nrr8$3@dont-email.me:
textiLeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:kv1e4k58j47f4o3q6gegnr97h1u1pb7kmb@4ax.com:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 15:15:20 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>news:gnuc4ktmeqtv27om90omnh955saohngivq@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 23:34:56 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>news:jn3c4kdilra6semciddh3q7g7k7vaje14j@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 19:47:15 -0000 (UTC), BaxterHow
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Curt <curtrr2@89701.net> wrote in >>>>>>>>news:dcbg5h56kx.1749411259@xsjhi.pl:
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some >>>>>>>>> news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21:
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll on >>>>>>>>>>>>> >in?
that?about we give them the same due process that they used to >>>>>>>>>>>>> >do
You dickturd keep parroting the same old debunked propagandaHere's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go. >>>>>>>>>>>You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution in Los >>>>>>>>>>> Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he convince >>>>>>>>>>> juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless
they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free phones, >>>>>>>>> free housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free >>>>>>>>> tranny conversions and more. Why don't you try that in Mexico, >>>>>>>>> see what happens and report back?
Post the debunking.....
Let's start with one claim:
===========
CLAIM: The U.S. government gives immigrants who cross the country's >>>>>>border illegally smartphones with unlimited texting and internet >>>>>>access.
AP'S ASSESSMENT: False. Immigration and Customs Enforcement does >>>>>>give some immigrants phones. However, they can only access an app >>>>>>called SmartLink, which is used to monitor immigrants after they >>>>>>cross the border, according to the agency, the company that makes >>>>>>the phones and an immigration expert. The devices are not connected >>>>>>to a cellular network and cannot be used to browse the internet, >>>>>>make unauthorized phone calls, or access apps other than SmartLink. >>>>>>
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-immigrant-phone-internet-
The claim by conservaturds about "free phones" is fully functionaln g- 521577996794
Good trick.... AP apparently found someone who made that claim,
and made a big deal about it.
It wasn't part of the post you claimed to have been debunked, and
now you've said it was true.
What part of "free phones" did you not understand.
Doesn't negate nor contradict the AP assessment.
"ICE said the SmartLINK app sends push notifications and reminders >>>>> for upcoming appointments; provides a database for participants to >>>>> find food banks, clothing or other community services; and allows
users to upload and send documents to their case specialists."
Which not only doesn't "debunk" the claim that illegals got free
phones, it asserts that it's true. Do you have any more "debunking."
commercially available phones - not the limited bricks that are given
applicants that are legally in the immigration system.
illegal immigrants do NOT get "money, free health care, free phones,
free housing, free education, free food, free clothing, free tranny
conversions and more." Some refugees, legal immigrants, legal asylum
seekers do get SOME of those benefits under certain conditions - but
none go to illegal immigrants.
They do in California, Illinois and New York.
Do explain just HOW that can happen. Being "illegal" means the government
has NO record, no information on who you are or where you are. So does
the government set up booths where those migrants go and say 'I'm an
illegal alien, give me money'?
What stupidit! If the government knows who they are and where they are,
they are NOT "illegal".
In article <102k35f$8k1m$1@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
George Pimpton <jorge@si.not> wrote in news:cf896f763a.1749882787
@tmxho.ke:
On 09 Jun 2025, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> posted sometexti
news:1027en7$nrr8$3@dont-email.me:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:kv1e4k58j47f4o3q6gegnr97h1u1pb7kmb@4ax.com:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 15:15:20 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:gnuc4ktmeqtv27om90omnh955saohngivq@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 23:34:56 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:jn3c4kdilra6semciddh3q7g7k7vaje14j@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 19:47:15 -0000 (UTC), BaxterHow
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Curt <curtrr2@89701.net> wrote in
news:dcbg5h56kx.1749411259@xsjhi.pl:
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted
some news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21:
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll
on in?
that?about we give them the same due process that they used
to do
You dickturd keep parroting the same old debunked propagandaHere's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go.
You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution in
Los Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he
convince juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless
they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free
phones, free housing, free education, free food, free
clothing, free tranny conversions and more. Why don't you
try that in Mexico, see what happens and report back?
Post the debunking.....
Let's start with one claim:
===========
CLAIM: The U.S. government gives immigrants who cross the
country's border illegally smartphones with unlimited texting
and internet access.
AP'S ASSESSMENT: False. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
does give some immigrants phones. However, they can only access
an app called SmartLink, which is used to monitor immigrants
after they cross the border, according to the agency, the
company that makes the phones and an immigration expert. The
devices are not connected to a cellular network and cannot be
used to browse the internet, make unauthorized phone calls, or
access apps other than SmartLink.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-immigrant-phone-internet-
Do explain just HOW that can happen. Being "illegal" means theThe claim by conservaturds about "free phones" is fully functionaln g- 521577996794
Good trick.... AP apparently found someone who made that
claim, and made a big deal about it.
It wasn't part of the post you claimed to have been debunked,
and now you've said it was true.
What part of "free phones" did you not understand.
Doesn't negate nor contradict the AP assessment.
"ICE said the SmartLINK app sends push notifications and
reminders for upcoming appointments; provides a database for
participants to find food banks, clothing or other community
services; and allows users to upload and send documents to
their case specialists."
Which not only doesn't "debunk" the claim that illegals got free
phones, it asserts that it's true. Do you have any more
"debunking."
commercially available phones - not the limited bricks that are
given applicants that are legally in the immigration system.
illegal immigrants do NOT get "money, free health care, free
phones, free housing, free education, free food, free clothing,
free tranny conversions and more." Some refugees, legal
immigrants, legal asylum seekers do get SOME of those benefits
under certain conditions - but none go to illegal immigrants.
They do in California, Illinois and New York.
government has NO record, no information on who you are or where you
are. So does the government set up booths where those migrants go
and say 'I'm an illegal alien, give me money'?
What stupidit! If the government knows who they are and where they
are, they are NOT "illegal".
They do and they are being rounded up. Biden wouldn't do
that. You're failing again.
Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> wrote in news:MPG.42b74c7bc9a6df1c98a340@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <102k35f$8k1m$1@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
George Pimpton <jorge@si.not> wrote in news:cf896f763a.1749882787
@tmxho.ke:
On 09 Jun 2025, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> posted sometexti
news:1027en7$nrr8$3@dont-email.me:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:kv1e4k58j47f4o3q6gegnr97h1u1pb7kmb@4ax.com:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 15:15:20 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:gnuc4ktmeqtv27om90omnh955saohngivq@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 23:34:56 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:jn3c4kdilra6semciddh3q7g7k7vaje14j@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 19:47:15 -0000 (UTC), BaxterHow
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Curt <curtrr2@89701.net> wrote in
news:dcbg5h56kx.1749411259@xsjhi.pl:
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted
some news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21:
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and stroll
on in?
that?about we give them the same due process that they used
to do
You dickturd keep parroting the same old debunked propagandaHere's their rights: if they are illegal, out they go.
You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution in
Los Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he
convince juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless
they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free
phones, free housing, free education, free food, free
clothing, free tranny conversions and more. Why don't you
try that in Mexico, see what happens and report back?
Post the debunking.....
Let's start with one claim:
===========
CLAIM: The U.S. government gives immigrants who cross the
country's border illegally smartphones with unlimited texting
and internet access.
AP'S ASSESSMENT: False. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
does give some immigrants phones. However, they can only access
an app called SmartLink, which is used to monitor immigrants
after they cross the border, according to the agency, the
company that makes the phones and an immigration expert. The
devices are not connected to a cellular network and cannot be
used to browse the internet, make unauthorized phone calls, or
access apps other than SmartLink.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-immigrant-phone-internet-
Do explain just HOW that can happen. Being "illegal" means theThe claim by conservaturds about "free phones" is fully functionaln g- 521577996794
Good trick.... AP apparently found someone who made that
claim, and made a big deal about it.
It wasn't part of the post you claimed to have been debunked,
and now you've said it was true.
What part of "free phones" did you not understand.
Doesn't negate nor contradict the AP assessment.
"ICE said the SmartLINK app sends push notifications and
reminders for upcoming appointments; provides a database for
participants to find food banks, clothing or other community
services; and allows users to upload and send documents to
their case specialists."
Which not only doesn't "debunk" the claim that illegals got free
phones, it asserts that it's true. Do you have any more
"debunking."
commercially available phones - not the limited bricks that are
given applicants that are legally in the immigration system.
illegal immigrants do NOT get "money, free health care, free
phones, free housing, free education, free food, free clothing,
free tranny conversions and more." Some refugees, legal
immigrants, legal asylum seekers do get SOME of those benefits
under certain conditions - but none go to illegal immigrants.
They do in California, Illinois and New York.
government has NO record, no information on who you are or where you
are. So does the government set up booths where those migrants go
and say 'I'm an illegal alien, give me money'?
What stupidit! If the government knows who they are and where they
are, they are NOT "illegal".
They do and they are being rounded up. Biden wouldn't do
that. You're failing again.
The ones they're rounding up are not illegals.
In article <102lf94$mgds$2@dont-email.me>, bax02in
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.42b74c7bc9a6df1c98a340@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <102k35f$8k1m$1@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
George Pimpton <jorge@si.not> wrote in news:cf896f763a.1749882787
@tmxho.ke:
On 09 Jun 2025, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> posted some
news:1027en7$nrr8$3@dont-email.me:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:kv1e4k58j47f4o3q6gegnr97h1u1pb7kmb@4ax.com:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 15:15:20 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:gnuc4ktmeqtv27om90omnh955saohngivq@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 23:34:56 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote
strollnews:jn3c4kdilra6semciddh3q7g7k7vaje14j@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 19:47:15 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Curt <curtrr2@89701.net> wrote in
news:dcbg5h56kx.1749411259@xsjhi.pl:
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted
some news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21:
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and
usedHowon in?
about we give them the same due process that they
go.that?to do
Here's their rights: if they are illegal, out they
in
You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution
youLos Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he
convince juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless
they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free
phones, free housing, free education, free food, free
clothing, free tranny conversions and more. Why don't
propagandatry that in Mexico, see what happens and report back?You dickturd keep parroting the same old debunked
access
Post the debunking.....
Let's start with one claim:
===========
CLAIM: The U.S. government gives immigrants who cross the
country's border illegally smartphones with unlimited texting
and internet access.
AP'S ASSESSMENT: False. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
does give some immigrants phones. However, they can only
oran app called SmartLink, which is used to monitor immigrants
after they cross the border, according to the agency, the
company that makes the phones and an immigration expert. The
devices are not connected to a cellular network and cannot be
used to browse the internet, make unauthorized phone calls,
internet-access apps other than SmartLink.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-immigrant-phone-
freetexti
n g- 521577996794
Good trick.... AP apparently found someone who made that
claim, and made a big deal about it.
It wasn't part of the post you claimed to have been debunked,
and now you've said it was true.
What part of "free phones" did you not understand.
Doesn't negate nor contradict the AP assessment.
"ICE said the SmartLINK app sends push notifications and
reminders for upcoming appointments; provides a database for
participants to find food banks, clothing or other community
services; and allows users to upload and send documents to
their case specialists."
Which not only doesn't "debunk" the claim that illegals got
functionalphones, it asserts that it's true. Do you have any moreThe claim by conservaturds about "free phones" is fully
"debunking."
youDo explain just HOW that can happen. Being "illegal" means thecommercially available phones - not the limited bricks that are
given applicants that are legally in the immigration system.
illegal immigrants do NOT get "money, free health care, free
phones, free housing, free education, free food, free clothing,
free tranny conversions and more." Some refugees, legal
immigrants, legal asylum seekers do get SOME of those benefits
under certain conditions - but none go to illegal immigrants.
They do in California, Illinois and New York.
government has NO record, no information on who you are or where
The ones they're rounding up are not illegals.are. So does the government set up booths where those migrants go
and say 'I'm an illegal alien, give me money'?
What stupidit! If the government knows who they are and where they
are, they are NOT "illegal".
They do and they are being rounded up. Biden wouldn't do
that. You're failing again.
Prove it.
Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> wrote in news:MPG.42b851fa2cfb9b0e98a358 @usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <102lf94$mgds$2@dont-email.me>, bax02in
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.42b74c7bc9a6df1c98a340@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <102k35f$8k1m$1@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
George Pimpton <jorge@si.not> wrote in news:cf896f763a.1749882787
@tmxho.ke:
On 09 Jun 2025, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> posted some
news:1027en7$nrr8$3@dont-email.me:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:kv1e4k58j47f4o3q6gegnr97h1u1pb7kmb@4ax.com:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 15:15:20 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:gnuc4ktmeqtv27om90omnh955saohngivq@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 23:34:56 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote
strollnews:jn3c4kdilra6semciddh3q7g7k7vaje14j@4ax.com:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 19:47:15 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Curt <curtrr2@89701.net> wrote in
news:dcbg5h56kx.1749411259@xsjhi.pl:
On 08 Jun 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted
some news:XnsB2F8583F219E6629555@69.80.102.21:
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:10242on$3rrv5$1@dont-email.me:
On 8/6/25 6:11, NoBody wrote:
It was okay for them to just ignore US law and
usedHowon in?
about we give them the same due process that they
go.that?to do
Here's their rights: if they are illegal, out they
in
You can get a chance to try ignoring the Constitution
youLos Angeles. Don Jello can huff and puff, but can he
convince juries?
If they are illegals they have to go - unless
they have money.
Democrats will give them money, free health care, free
phones, free housing, free education, free food, free
clothing, free tranny conversions and more. Why don't
propagandatry that in Mexico, see what happens and report back?You dickturd keep parroting the same old debunked
access
Post the debunking.....
Let's start with one claim:
===========
CLAIM: The U.S. government gives immigrants who cross the
country's border illegally smartphones with unlimited texting
and internet access.
AP'S ASSESSMENT: False. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
does give some immigrants phones. However, they can only
oran app called SmartLink, which is used to monitor immigrants
after they cross the border, according to the agency, the
company that makes the phones and an immigration expert. The
devices are not connected to a cellular network and cannot be
used to browse the internet, make unauthorized phone calls,
internet-access apps other than SmartLink.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-immigrant-phone-
freetexti
n g- 521577996794
Good trick.... AP apparently found someone who made that
claim, and made a big deal about it.
It wasn't part of the post you claimed to have been debunked,
and now you've said it was true.
What part of "free phones" did you not understand.
Doesn't negate nor contradict the AP assessment.
"ICE said the SmartLINK app sends push notifications and
reminders for upcoming appointments; provides a database for
participants to find food banks, clothing or other community
services; and allows users to upload and send documents to
their case specialists."
Which not only doesn't "debunk" the claim that illegals got
functionalphones, it asserts that it's true. Do you have any moreThe claim by conservaturds about "free phones" is fully
"debunking."
youDo explain just HOW that can happen. Being "illegal" means thecommercially available phones - not the limited bricks that are
given applicants that are legally in the immigration system.
illegal immigrants do NOT get "money, free health care, free
phones, free housing, free education, free food, free clothing,
free tranny conversions and more." Some refugees, legal
immigrants, legal asylum seekers do get SOME of those benefits
under certain conditions - but none go to illegal immigrants.
They do in California, Illinois and New York.
government has NO record, no information on who you are or where
The ones they're rounding up are not illegals.are. So does the government set up booths where those migrants go
and say 'I'm an illegal alien, give me money'?
What stupidit! If the government knows who they are and where they
are, they are NOT "illegal".
They do and they are being rounded up. Biden wouldn't do
that. You're failing again.
Prove it.
Ewww ... did you shit your pants again?
On 23 Jun 2025, Al Feldhauser wrote:
On 6/23/2025 2:58 AM, Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly
obese convicted child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 22 Jun 2025, Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.@gmail.com> posted some
news:KhZ5Q.1624918$vvyf.1251378@fx18.iad:
On 6/21/2025 2:00 PM, James Muenter wrote:
On 6/5/2025 10:11 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
On 6/4/2025 9:43 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and
gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled
and lied:
"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:k6m04kplm5sjk3sbo8h3jcj29tt1b5r28v@4ax.com...
NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jun 2025 16:07:02 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
artimus <atm@youtoob.uk> wrote:
On 03 Jun 2025, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> posted some
news:milt3khjjinp4b8teo7pfpb6n18m6e3dv3@4ax.com:
NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:Intentionally overstaying a visa is grounds for immediate >>>>>>>>>>> apprehension and removal. Why weren't Biden and Mayorkas >>>>>>>>>>> doing it?
Please post a link the thread you authored about the >>>>>>>>>>>>> illegal who just burned people to death in Colorado. Oh >>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess you didn't actually care about Americans being >>>>>>>>>>>>> burned to death.
He apparently overstayed a visa, not really an "illegal", >>>>>>>>>>>> but "I guess you don't actually care about" women and
children bombed to hell in Gaza, this character in CO was >>>>>>>>>>>> obviously nuts, violence isn't the answer, but you can >>>>>>>>>>>> expect this kind of wild stuff in reaction to the war, the >>>>>>>>>>>> U.S. backed Israel in it, we're culpable to the destruction. >>>>>>>>>>>
Probably because it would conflict with privacy concerns, and >>>>>>>>>> just wasn't warranted.
Laughter. Privacy concerns...
Yeah, you know, in a "free country" we can't have agents just
body- slamming and arresting people willy-nilly. FFS, why do >>>>>>>> you let your mind be misdirected so much?
Seems to me most countries do that with criminal aliens.
No, scooter, most countries do *not* do that.
Italy did.
No, Italy did not did not let immigration police just detain people
about whom they had some vague, inarticulable suspicion or hunch
that they were aliens who were also criminals.
Yes they did.
No, Blowjob, they did not.
Italy’s Meloni gets tough on migrants
Italian PM announces plan to build new detention centers to hold migrants for
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message news:103jo32$3h62c$3@dont-email.me...
burch cassidy <bcassidy@ucla.edu> wrote in
news:20250626.124020.282b298a@msgid.frell.theremailer.net:
On 25 Jun 2025, Elizabeth Boudreaux <another.whore@jeanerette.la> is=============
too stupid to realize his tell. What a fucking idiot!
On 6/23/2025 10:49 PM, Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly
obese convicted child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
Rudy is my intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and
physical superior.
That's right, Blowjob, you stupid *fat* cocksucker.
On 6/23/2025 2:58 AM, Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly
obese convicted child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 22 Jun 2025, Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.entfÃfÆ'Ã,¯Ãfâ?sÃ,¿Ãfâ?sÃ,½rben.@gmail.com>
posted some news:KhZ5Q.1624918$vvyf.1251378@fx18.iad:
On 6/21/2025 2:00 PM, James Muenter wrote:
On 6/5/2025 10:11 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
On 6/4/2025 9:43 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and >>>>>>>>>> gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled >>>>>>>>>> and lied:
"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:k6m04kplm5sjk3sbo8h3jcj29tt1b5r28v@4ax.com...
NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jun 2025 16:07:02 -0400, Joel
<joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
artimus <atm@youtoob.uk> wrote:
On 03 Jun 2025, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> posted some >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:milt3khjjinp4b8teo7pfpb6n18m6e3dv3@4ax.com: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
Please post a link the thread you authored about the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> illegal who just burned people to death inHe apparently overstayed a visa, not really an "illegal", >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but "I guess you don't actually care about" women and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> children bombed to hell in Gaza, this character in CO was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> obviously nuts, violence isn't the answer, but you can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expect this kind of wild stuff in reaction to the war, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the U.S. backed Israel in it, we're culpable to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> destruction.
Colorado.ÃfÆ'ââ,¬Å¡Ãfâ?sÃ, Oh I guess you didn't
actually care about Americans being burned to death. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Intentionally overstaying a visa is grounds for immediate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apprehension and removal.ÃfÆ'ââ,¬Å¡Ãfâ?sÃ, Why weren't
Biden and Mayorkas doing it?
Probably because it would conflict with privacy concerns, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and just wasn't warranted.
Laughter.ÃfÆ'ââ,¬Å¡Ãfâ?sÃ, Privacy concerns... >>>>>>>>>>>>
Yeah, you know, in a "free country" we can't have agents just >>>>>>>>>>>> body- slamming and arresting people
willy-nilly.ÃfÆ'ââ,¬Å¡Ãfâ?sÃ, FFS, why do you let your
mind be misdirected so much?
Seems to me most countries do that with criminal aliens.
No, scooter, most countries do *not* do that.
Italy did.
No, Italy did not did not let immigration police just detain
people about whom they had some vague, inarticulable suspicion or >>>>>>>> hunch that they were aliens who were also criminals.
Yes they did.
No, Blowjob, they did not.
It's a given that you are a fat dumb cocksucker.
Yes, want a Blowjob, I am.
Italy refused to let the filthy black animals into the country. Go
back to Africa, scum.
AI Overview
Translation:
On 6/26/2025 9:25 AM, Scout wrote:
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:103jo32$3h62c$3@dont-email.me...
burch cassidy <bcassidy@ucla.edu> wrote in
news:20250626.124020.282b298a@msgid.frell.theremailer.net:
On 25 Jun 2025, Elizabeth Boudreaux <another.whore@jeanerette.la> is=============
too stupid to realize his tell. What a fucking idiot!
On 6/23/2025 10:49 PM, Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly
obese convicted child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
Rudy is my intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and >>>>>> physical superior.
That's right, Blowjob, you stupid *fat* cocksucker.
On 6/23/2025 2:58 AM, Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly >>>>>>> obese convicted child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 22 Jun 2025, Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.entfÃfÆ'Ã,¯Ãfâ?sÃ,¿Ãfâ?sÃ,½rben.@gmail.com>
posted some news:KhZ5Q.1624918$vvyf.1251378@fx18.iad:
On 6/21/2025 2:00 PM, James Muenter wrote:
On 6/5/2025 10:11 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
On 6/4/2025 9:43 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and >>>>>>>>>>> gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled >>>>>>>>>>> and lied:
No, scooter, most countries do *not* do that.
"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:k6m04kplm5sjk3sbo8h3jcj29tt1b5r28v@4ax.com...
NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jun 2025 16:07:02 -0400, Joel
<joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
artimus <atm@youtoob.uk> wrote:
On 03 Jun 2025, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> posted some >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:milt3khjjinp4b8teo7pfpb6n18m6e3dv3@4ax.com: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
Please post a link the thread you authored about the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> illegal who just burned people to death in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Colorado.ÃfÆ'ââ,¬Å¡Ãfâ?sÃ, Oh I guess you didn'tHe apparently overstayed a visa, not really an "illegal", >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but "I guess you don't actually care about" women and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> children bombed to hell in Gaza, this character in CO was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> obviously nuts, violence isn't the answer, but you can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expect this kind of wild stuff in reaction to the war, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the U.S. backed Israel in it, we're culpable to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> destruction.
actually care about Americans being burned to death. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Intentionally overstaying a visa is grounds for immediate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apprehension and removal.ÃfÆ'ââ,¬Å¡Ãfâ?sÃ, Why weren't
Biden and Mayorkas doing it?
Probably because it would conflict with privacy concerns, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and just wasn't warranted.
Laughter.ÃfÆ'ââ,¬Å¡Ãfâ?sÃ, Privacy concerns... >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Yeah, you know, in a "free country" we can't have agents just >>>>>>>>>>>>> body- slamming and arresting people
willy-nilly.ÃfÆ'ââ,¬Å¡Ãfâ?sÃ, FFS, why do you let your
mind be misdirected so much?
Seems to me most countries do that with criminal aliens. >>>>>>>>>>>
Italy did.
No, Italy did not did not let immigration police just detain >>>>>>>>> people about whom they had some vague, inarticulable suspicion or >>>>>>>>> hunch that they were aliens who were also criminals.
Yes they did.
No, Blowjob, they did not.
It's a given that you are a fat dumb cocksucker.
Yes, want a Blowjob, I am.
Italy refused to let the filthy black animals into the country. Go
back to Africa, scum.
AI Overview
Translation:
That's a scooterism,
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <campbell@neotext.ca> wrote in message news:YXf7Q.47859$W5Jb.36157@fx09.iad...
On 6/26/2025 9:25 AM, Scout wrote:
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:103jo32$3h62c$3@dont-email.me...
burch cassidy <bcassidy@ucla.edu> wrote in
news:20250626.124020.282b298a@msgid.frell.theremailer.net:
On 25 Jun 2025, Elizabeth Boudreaux <another.whore@jeanerette.la> is >>>>> too stupid to realize his tell. What a fucking idiot!=============
On 6/23/2025 10:49 PM, Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly >>>>>> obese convicted child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
Rudy is my intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and >>>>>>> physical superior.
That's right, Blowjob, you stupid *fat* cocksucker.
On 6/23/2025 2:58 AM, Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly >>>>>>>> obese convicted child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 22 Jun 2025, Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.entfÃfÆ'Ã,¯Ãfâ?sÃ,¿Ãfâ?sÃ,½rben.@gmail.com>
posted some news:KhZ5Q.1624918$vvyf.1251378@fx18.iad:
On 6/21/2025 2:00 PM, James Muenter wrote:
On 6/5/2025 10:11 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
On 6/4/2025 9:43 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and >>>>>>>>>>>> gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled >>>>>>>>>>>> and lied:
No, scooter, most countries do *not* do that.
"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:k6m04kplm5sjk3sbo8h3jcj29tt1b5r28v@4ax.com...
NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jun 2025 16:07:02 -0400, Joel
<joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
artimus <atm@youtoob.uk> wrote:
On 03 Jun 2025, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> posted some >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:milt3khjjinp4b8teo7pfpb6n18m6e3dv3@4ax.com: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
Please post a link the thread you authored about the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> illegal who just burned people to death in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Colorado.ÃfÆ'ââ,¬Å¡Ãfâ?sÃ, Oh I guess you didn'tHe apparently overstayed a visa, not really an "illegal", >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but "I guess you don't actually care about" women and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> children bombed to hell in Gaza, this character in CO was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> obviously nuts, violence isn't the answer, but you can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expect this kind of wild stuff in reaction to the war, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the U.S. backed Israel in it, we're culpable to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> destruction.
actually care about Americans being burned to death. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Intentionally overstaying a visa is grounds for immediate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apprehension and removal.ÃfÆ'ââ,¬Å¡Ãfâ?sÃ, Why weren't
Biden and Mayorkas doing it?
Probably because it would conflict with privacy concerns, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and just wasn't warranted.
Laughter.ÃfÆ'ââ,¬Å¡Ãfâ?sÃ, Privacy concerns... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Yeah, you know, in a "free country" we can't have agents just >>>>>>>>>>>>>> body- slamming and arresting people
willy-nilly.ÃfÆ'ââ,¬Å¡Ãfâ?sÃ, FFS, why do you let your
mind be misdirected so much?
Seems to me most countries do that with criminal aliens. >>>>>>>>>>>>
Italy did.
No, Italy did not did not let immigration police just detain >>>>>>>>>> people about whom they had some vague, inarticulable suspicion or >>>>>>>>>> hunch that they were aliens who were also criminals.
Yes they did.
No, Blowjob, they did not.
It's a given that you are a fat dumb cocksucker.
Yes, want a Blowjob, I am.
Italy refused to let the filthy black animals into the country. Go >>>>> back to Africa, scum.
AI Overview
Translation:
That's a scooterism,
That's a Rudyism
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 29:14:28 |
| Calls: | 10,390 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 14,064 |
| Messages: | 6,417,083 |